Author Archive

Author photo

Erica Rowell

A published author with more than 15 years of combined experience writing for news outlets and web sites, Erica Rowell has focused on environmental science since 2003. She spearheaded Environmental Defense Fund's guide to energy-saving lights, creating what Smithsonian Magazine called "the best CFL guide on the Net." She is now the Online Managing Editor of The Nicholas School of the Environment, where, among other duties, she edits The Green Grok, the upcoming blog from the green giant, Dr. Bill Chameides.

About Dr. Bill Chameides, Dean of the Nicholas School of the Environment and Earth Studies at Duke University.

Bill Chameides is the lead author of the The Green Grok, the forthcoming blog about environmental science that examines pathways to a sustainable future.

Bill combines more than 30 years in academia as a professor, researcher, teacher, and mentor with a 3-year stint in the NGO world as the chief scientist of the Environmental Defense Fund. He is a:
member of the National Academy of Sciences,
• fellow of the American Geophysical Union, and
• recipient of the American Geophysical Union’s MacElwane Award.

Bill has served on numerous national and international committees and task forces and in recognition was named a National Associate of the National Academies for "extraordinary service."

The forthcoming The Green Grok blog aims to spark lively discussions about environmental science. A distinguished scientist with a flair for making science accessible and fun, Bill has explained the benefits of carbon trading to NPR listeners, doled out green tips to ABCNEWS viewers, and turned Katie Couric on to global warming solutions on The Today Show.

Read his full bio at nicholas.duke.edu.

Part 2: There Are Good and Bad Biofuels

Today’s post is by Dr. Bill Chameides, dean of the Nicholas School of the Environment and lead author of the forthcoming blog The Green Grok. This is the second post in a 2-part series on biofuels.

Last week’s topic was why corn ethanol is an environmental loser.

But are all biofuels losers? No. Some can be winners. One of those is called cellulosic ethanol.
What Is Cellulosic Ethanol?
All ethanol — whether it is corn or cellulosic — is the same chemical compound: C2H5OH. You might recall from elementary chemistry courses that the “OH” group at the end of the formula indicates that the compound is an “alcohol.” Alcohols can have varying numbers of carbon atoms. Alcohol with two carbon atoms is called “ethanol.” The other alcohols are generally too toxic to be ingested, and thus ethanol has been the libation of choice down through the ages. (Ethanol used as fuel is rendered nonpotable.)

So corn ethanol and cellulosic ethanol don’t signify different types of ethanol, but rather the different material (or feedstocks) used to produce them.

Biofuels Part I: Corn Ethanol Isn’t the Solution

Written by Dr. Bill Chameides, dean of the Nicholas School of the Environment and lead author of the forthcoming blog The Green Grok.
This post is Part 1 of a 2-part series on biofuels. Today’s post looks at corn; Part 2 will examine the most promising biofuels.

Who doesn’t want to be green? But beware of automobile ads claiming environmental benefits from home-grown ethanol. Almost all U.S. ethanol comes from corn and, as a fuel, corn just isn’t as “amaizing” as they say.

“What if we could live green by going yellow?” one TV spot asks. “What if we could lower greenhouse gas emissions,” it continues, promisingly, “with a fuel that grew back every year?” Sounds great doesn’t it? Sorry folks, it’s just not so.

Tapping the Wind and Sun to Save Water

This post is by Dr. Bill Chameides, Dean of the Nicholas School of the Environment and lead author of the forthcoming blog The Green Grok.

Everyone knows we need green energy to fight global warming. But there’s another big reason to tap renewable power sources –- not enough water.

Large swaths of the Southwest and Southeast are in the throes of debilitating droughts. North Texas and Oklahoma’s recent dry spell dragged on from 2003 to the spring of 2007 (more on U.S. droughts). Droughts have even wiped out entire civilizations like the Anasazi (see Jared Diamond’s Collapse and Eugene Linden‘s Winds of Change).

But today’s water problems are far more profound than those of the Anasazi. The huge quantities we use — unprecedented in human history — make us more vulnerable to drought. Our water woes stem from an ever-increasing demand for water to slake the thirsts of a growing population on the one hand and to irrigate crops to feed that same population on the other.

Few people appreciate that yet another sector is clamoring for more water — the power industry. Fortunately we have the technology to wean this one from our dwindling supplies.

Advertisement