<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
  xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
  xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
  >

<channel>
  <title>Green Options &#187; ads</title>
  <link>http://greenoptions.com/tag/ads</link>
  <description>Posts tagged 'ads'</description>
  <pubDate>Thu, 18 Dec 2008 04:39:07 +0000</pubDate>
  <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
  <language>en</language>
  <item>
    <title>10 Companies to Boycott for Sending You Junk Mail</title>
    <link>http://planetsave.com/blog/2008/12/18/10-companies-to-boycott-for-sending-you-junk-mail/</link>
    <comments>http://planetsave.com/blog/2008/12/18/10-companies-to-boycott-for-sending-you-junk-mail/#comments</comments>
    <pubDate>Thu, 18 Dec 2008 04:39:07 +0000</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Alex Felsinger</dc:creator>
    
		<category><![CDATA[Nature &amp; Conservation]]></category>

    <guid isPermaLink="false">http://planetsave.com/blog/2008/12/18/10-companies-to-boycott-for-sending-you-junk-mail/</guid>
    <description><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://planetsave.com/files/2008/12/junkmail.jpg"><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-3574" src="http://go635254.s3.amazonaws.com/planetsave/files/2008/12/junkmail.jpg" alt="" width="500" height="311" /></a></p>
<p><strong>Conservation group <a href="http://www.forestethics.org/" target="_blank">ForestEthics</a> has released their annual &#8220;Naughty or Nice&#8221; list of corporations regarding their treatment of our forests. These ten companies continue to fill your mailbox with junk at the expense of the trees.</strong></p>

<p>The list, determined by four separate criteria, includes a &#8220;Checking Twice&#8221; category for companies in a gray area. JC Penny has decreased their direct mail use but still supports logging companies, so while they stay out the top 10 snail-mail-spammers, but still aren&#8217;t free of all charges.</p>
<p>Check out the rest of the list, along with 10 other companies who are being nice to the trees, below:</p>
<p><a href="http://planetsave.com/blog/2008/12/18/10-companies-to-boycott-for-sending-you-junk-mail/" class="more-link">Read more of this story &#187;</a></p>
]]></description>
    <wfw:commentRss>http://planetsave.com/blog/2008/12/18/10-companies-to-boycott-for-sending-you-junk-mail/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>Do Ads Hurt Families? (And If So, What to Do?): Healthy Children, Healthy Planet 3</title>
    <link>http://ecochildsplay.com/2008/03/10/do-ads-hurt-families-and-if-so-what-to-do-healthy-children-healthy-planet-3/</link>
    <comments>http://ecochildsplay.com/2008/03/10/do-ads-hurt-families-and-if-so-what-to-do-healthy-children-healthy-planet-3/#comments</comments>
    <pubDate>Tue, 11 Mar 2008 04:41:32 +0000</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Ali Benjamin</dc:creator>
    
		<category><![CDATA[Education]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Other Environmental Topics]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Video &amp; Media]]></category>

    <guid isPermaLink="false">http://ecochildsplay.com/2008/03/10/do-ads-hurt-families-and-if-so-what-to-do-healthy-children-healthy-planet-3/</guid>
    <description><![CDATA[<p><em>This post reflects on the third week of my seven-part “Healthy Children, Healthy Planet” curriculum, a fantastic discussion group by the Northwest Earth Institute.</em></p>
<p>40,000 television commercials a year. That&#8217;s what the average American child sees. That&#8217;s around <a href="http://mediafamily.com/facts/facts_childadv.shtml">100 ads for every 4 hours of television. </a></p>
<p><a href='http://ecochildsplay.com/files/2008/03/tony-the-frog.jpg' title='tony-the-frog.jpg'><img src="http://go635254.s3.amazonaws.com/ecochildsplay/files/2008/03/tony-the-frog.jpg" alt='tony-the-frog.jpg' /></a>What&#8217;s that, you say? No TV in your house? Oh, but your kids will still see plenty of ads. There&#8217;s online <a href="http://www.childrennow.org/newsroom/press_coverage/junk_food_games.html">adver-gaming</a>. There are <a href="http://www.usatoday.com/news/nation/2005-12-26-school-advertising_x.htm">ads on school buses</a>. Ads in the <a href="http://www.mediachannel.org/atissue/consumingkids/">classroom</a>. <a href="http://www.brandchannel.com/features_effect.asp?pf_id=251">There&#8217;s product placement</a> in movies. Not to mention billboards, posters, textbook covers, &#8230;it&#8217;s all fair game.</p>
<p>Week 3 of the <a href="http://www.nwei.org/discussion_courses/course-offerings/heathty-children-healthy-planet">Healthy Children, Healthy Planet </a>series, the 7-part parenting discussion course from the <a href="http://www.nwei.org/">Northwest Earth Institute</a>, was all about ads. Namely, the pervasiveness of ads in our children&#8217;s lives, and whether it is even possible to create ad-free spaces in their lives.</p>
<p>What&#8217;s clear is that advertising is different in both quantity and quality than it&#8217;s ever been before. The amount of money spent on marketing to children — $2 billion annually — is close to <a href="http://www.mediachannel.org/originals/kidsell.shtml">10 times greater than it was even in 1990.</a> And the nature of it has changed, too — mostly, because there&#8217;s no place safe from it. Not schools. Not movies. <a href="http://www.boston.com/yourlife/family/articles/2004/09/30/protecting_kids_from_marketers_clutches/">Not even your daughter&#8217;s sleepover party</a>.</p>
<p><a href="http://ecochildsplay.com/2008/03/10/do-ads-hurt-families-and-if-so-what-to-do-healthy-children-healthy-planet-3/" class="more-link">Read more of this story &#187;</a></p>
]]></description>
    <wfw:commentRss>http://ecochildsplay.com/2008/03/10/do-ads-hurt-families-and-if-so-what-to-do-healthy-children-healthy-planet-3/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
  </item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- 130 queries in 0.444 seconds. -->