<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
  xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
  xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
  >

<channel>
  <title>Green Options &#187; Agricultural waste</title>
  <link>http://greenoptions.com/tag/agricultural-waste</link>
  <description>Posts tagged 'Agricultural waste'</description>
  <pubDate>Mon, 21 Apr 2008 14:29:23 +0000</pubDate>
  <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
  <language>en</language>
  <item>
    <title>Do Ethanol, Biodiesel or Biomass Projects Produce Waste?  AURI Says NO, on The Lindberg Report.</title>
    <link>http://planetsave.com/blog/2008/04/21/do-ethanol-biodiesel-or-biomass-projects-produce-waste-auri-says-no-on-the-lindberg-report/</link>
    <comments>http://planetsave.com/blog/2008/04/21/do-ethanol-biodiesel-or-biomass-projects-produce-waste-auri-says-no-on-the-lindberg-report/#comments</comments>
    <pubDate>Mon, 21 Apr 2008 14:29:23 +0000</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Max Lindberg</dc:creator>
    
		<category><![CDATA[Renewable Energy]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[The Lindberg Report]]></category>

    <guid isPermaLink="false">http://planetsave.com/blog/2008/04/21/do-ethanol-biodiesel-or-biomass-projects-produce-waste-auri-says-no-on-the-lindberg-report/</guid>
    <description><![CDATA[<h3><img src="http://planetsave.com/files/2008/04/doering.jpg" alt="doering.jpg" /></h3>
<h3><strong>Alan Doering of AURI says agricultural residues and co-products aren&#8217;t waste, they&#8217;re potential new revenue streams to power the future.</strong></h3>
<p>AURI, or <a href="http://auri.org">Agricultural Utilization Research Institute</a> of Waseca, Minnesota, is a nonprofit organization that develops new uses for agricultural products and ag-processing co-products.</p>
<p>Alan Doering, an Associate Scientist with AURI, filled me in on steps being taken to utilize every bit of what used to be considered products of the waste stream.</p>
<p>Turkey droppings are fueling a power plant that serves 40,000 homes. Syrup derived from the making of ethanol is being used to power the plant that makes the ethanol. And there&#8217;s more on this amazing work in my interview with Alan.</p>
<p>This story contains additional media. <a href="http://planetsave.com/blog/2008/04/21/do-ethanol-biodiesel-or-biomass-projects-produce-waste-auri-says-no-on-the-lindberg-report/">Click here to view the media</a>.</p>
]]></description>
    <wfw:commentRss>http://planetsave.com/blog/2008/04/21/do-ethanol-biodiesel-or-biomass-projects-produce-waste-auri-says-no-on-the-lindberg-report/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
<enclosure url="http://planetsave.com/files/2008/04/doering-final.mp3" length="10422230" type="audio/mpeg" />
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>Economic Conditions Shifting in Favor of Ethanol</title>
    <link>http://cleantechnica.com/2008/02/07/economic-conditions-shifting-in-favor-of-ethanol/</link>
    <comments>http://cleantechnica.com/2008/02/07/economic-conditions-shifting-in-favor-of-ethanol/#comments</comments>
    <pubDate>Thu, 07 Feb 2008 18:14:45 +0000</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Sarah Lozanova</dc:creator>
    
		<category><![CDATA[alternative fuels]]></category>

    <guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/2008/02/07/economic-conditions-shifting-in-favor-of-ethanol/</guid>
    <description><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://cleantechnica.com/files/2008/02/agp3h6621_small.jpg" alt="agp3h6621_small.jpg" align="left" />One of the most viable solutions to our large-scale environmental challenges is to use &#8220;waste&#8221; instead of virgin materials.  This is especially true for the transportation fuels industry.    Unfortunately, with the current infrastructure in place, virgin resources can actually be more cost effective than &#8220;waste.&#8221;  I became aware of this when I toured the <a href="http://www.coskata.com">Coskata</a> ethanol laboratory  in suburban Chicago.  I discovered that there is a cheaper and more consistent supply of harvested trees to produce ethanol than trash.</p>
<p>Trees, agricultural waste, storm debris and trash are all viable fuel sources for ethanol, using <a href="http://gas2.org/2008/01/13/gm-announces-biofuel-partnership-cheap-green-ethanol/">the Coskata process</a>.  This highly flexible technology allows future manufacturing plants to cater to locally available materials, making ethanol viable in parts of the globe that would not use corn or sugar cane for fuel.    Argonne National Laboratory tests show that greenhouse gas emissions are up to 84% lower for Coskta ethanol than conventional gasoline.   It has a net energy balance of up to 7.7, compared to 1.3 for corn-based ethanol.  These results were achieved with a production cost of $1 a gallon when timber was used as an ethanol fuel source.</p>
<p>On face of it, you would think that garbage would be the cheapest way to produce fuel, given the flexibility of the Coskata process.  In fact, one of the most available and economically viable fuel sources is trees, with the low price tag of $50 a ton.  There is a very efficient infrastructure for harvesting and transporting trees.  They are available throughout the year, unlike some agricultural products.  It is actually cheaper to use trees than sorted garbage and agricultural waste.
<p><a href="http://cleantechnica.com/2008/02/07/economic-conditions-shifting-in-favor-of-ethanol/" class="more-link">Read more of this story &#187;</a></p>
]]></description>
    <wfw:commentRss>http://cleantechnica.com/2008/02/07/economic-conditions-shifting-in-favor-of-ethanol/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
  </item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- 79 queries in 0.460 seconds. -->