<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
  xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
  xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
  >

<channel>
  <title>Green Options &#187; Amazon</title>
  <link>http://greenoptions.com/tag/amazon</link>
  <description>Posts tagged 'Amazon'</description>
  <pubDate>Wed, 07 Oct 2009 10:03:06 +0000</pubDate>
  <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
  <language>en</language>
  <item>
    <title>Google Earth Climate &#38; Rainforest Tours</title>
    <link>http://cleantechnica.com/2009/10/07/google-earth-climate-rainforest-tours/</link>
    <comments>http://cleantechnica.com/2009/10/07/google-earth-climate-rainforest-tours/#comments</comments>
    <pubDate>Wed, 07 Oct 2009 10:03:06 +0000</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Zachary Shahan</dc:creator>
    
		<category><![CDATA[Climate Change]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Media]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[global warming]]></category>

    <guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/2009/10/07/google-earth-climate-rainforest-tours/</guid>
    <description><![CDATA[<p><a href='http://cleantechnica.com/files/2009/10/borneo1.jpg'><img src="http://go635254.s3.amazonaws.com/cleantechnica/files/2009/10/borneo1.jpg" alt="" width="448" height="306" class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-3604" /></a></p>
<h3><strong>You can now explore the Amazon, Madagascar, and Sebangau National Forest in Borneo through Google Earth.</strong></h3>
<p>On September 25, I wrote about a <a href="http://cleantechnica.com/2009/09/25/google-earth-shows-climate-change-effects/"><strong>Google Earth</strong></a> tour (narrated by AL Gore) and new Google Earth tools and layers which help people to look at the possible effects of climate change under three different scenarios. Now, three new tours have been launched that allow the exploration of critical rainforests and real-life success stories.</p>
<p>The tours (<strong>embedded below</strong>) have a great wealth of information and inspirational stories bound into succinct <strong><a href="http://earth.google.com/">Google Earth</a></strong> or <strong><a href="http://www.youtube.com/">YouTube</a></strong> videos.</p>
<p><a href="http://cleantechnica.com/2009/10/07/google-earth-climate-rainforest-tours/" class="more-link">Read more of this story &#187;</a></p>
]]></description>
    <wfw:commentRss>http://cleantechnica.com/2009/10/07/google-earth-climate-rainforest-tours/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>Amazon Says Goodbye to World&#8217;s Largest Meat Exporter</title>
    <link>http://ecoworldly.com/2009/10/01/amazon-says-goodbye-to-worlds-largest-meat-exporter/</link>
    <comments>http://ecoworldly.com/2009/10/01/amazon-says-goodbye-to-worlds-largest-meat-exporter/#comments</comments>
    <pubDate>Thu, 01 Oct 2009 12:33:29 +0000</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Zachary Shahan</dc:creator>
    
		<category><![CDATA[About Climate]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[About Environment]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[In Global]]></category>

    <guid isPermaLink="false">http://ecoworldly.com/2009/10/01/amazon-says-goodbye-to-worlds-largest-meat-exporter/</guid>
    <description><![CDATA[<p><a href='http://ecoworldly.com/files/2009/10/amazoncattle.jpg'><img src="http://go635254.s3.amazonaws.com/ecoworldly/files/2009/10/amazoncattle.jpg" alt="" width="448" height="305" class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-4154" /></a></p>
<h3><strong>Last month, I wrote about the <a href="http://ecoworldly.com/2009/08/17/worlds-largest-leather-exporter-backs-out-of-amazon/">world&#8217;s largest leather</a> exporter leaving the Amazon. This week there is even bigger news. The world&#8217;s largest meat exporter is leaving.</strong></h3>
<p><a href="http://ecoworldly.com/2009/10/01/amazon-says-goodbye-to-worlds-largest-meat-exporter/" class="more-link">Read more of this story &#187;</a></p>
]]></description>
    <wfw:commentRss>http://ecoworldly.com/2009/10/01/amazon-says-goodbye-to-worlds-largest-meat-exporter/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>New Report Finds Kindle Greener than Physical Books&#8230; Really?</title>
    <link>http://sustainablog.org/2009/09/07/new-report-finds-kindle-greener-than-physical-books-is-that-really-so/</link>
    <comments>http://sustainablog.org/2009/09/07/new-report-finds-kindle-greener-than-physical-books-is-that-really-so/#comments</comments>
    <pubDate>Mon, 07 Sep 2009 18:06:55 +0000</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Raz Godelnik</dc:creator>
    
		<category><![CDATA[Books, Magazines &amp; Literature]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Products, Reviews &amp; Previews]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>

    <guid isPermaLink="false">http://sustainablog.org/2009/09/07/new-report-finds-kindle-greener-than-physical-books-is-that-really-so/</guid>
    <description><![CDATA[<p><em>This post was originally published on <a href="http://ecolibris.blogspot.com/2009/09/new-report-finds-kindle-greener-than.html">Eco-Libris blog</a> on September 5.</em></p>
<p><a href="http://sustainablog.org/files/2009/09/kindle-and-book.jpg"><img class="size-medium wp-image-4952 alignright" style="float: right" src="http://go635254.s3.amazonaws.com/sustainablog/files/2009/09/kindle-and-book.jpg" alt="" width="200" height="99" /></a>On August 19 Cleantech Group published a report that was supposed to put an end to an ongoing debate on the question if the Kindle and other e-readers are actually greener than physical books. The release&#8217;s title was &#8220;<a href="http://cleantech.com/news/4867/cleantech-group-finds-positive-envi">E-readers a win for carbon emissions</a>.&#8221;</p>
<p>It was supposed to be the life cycle analysis many people, including myself were waiting for. I have to admit I was very excited to read about it as we <a href="http://www.ecolibris.net/ebooks.asp">follow this debate for a long time</a>. I decided to read it and see if this is really it. If it&#8217;s really over.</p>
<p>The report, entitled &#8216;The Environmental Impact of Amazon&#8217;s Kindle&#8217; was written by senior reporter Emma Ritch. I read the executive brief (7-page long) and was happy to find a well-written analysis that integrates many pieces of information that together create a more coherent picture. At the same time I wasn&#8217;t that sure about the validity of the findings.</p>
<p>There were two main issues that bothered me mostly: the carbon footprint of a single Kindle and the assumption about the number of e-books the average user is reading. As you&#8217;ll see these are important factors in the analysis and have significant influence on the findings.</p>
<p>Here are my thoughts about them in more details:</p>
<p><strong>1. What&#8217;s the carbon footprint of a single Kindle?</strong></p>
<p>This is an important part of the analysis - you can&#8217;t have a comparison between physical books and the Kindle without this figure. But fortunately the report has it: &#8220;&#8230;the second-generation Kindle represents the same emissions as 15 books bought in person or 30 purchased online. That would yield a range of between 60.2 to 306 kg of CO2, or an average of 167.78 kg of CO2 during its lifespan.&#8221;</p>
<p><a href="http://sustainablog.org/2009/09/07/new-report-finds-kindle-greener-than-physical-books-is-that-really-so/" class="more-link">Read more of this story &#187;</a></p>
]]></description>
    <wfw:commentRss>http://sustainablog.org/2009/09/07/new-report-finds-kindle-greener-than-physical-books-is-that-really-so/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>Fifth Judge for Chevron Amazon hearing withdraws</title>
    <link>http://redgreenandblue.org/2009/09/07/fifth-judge-for-chevron-amazon-hearing-withdraws/</link>
    <comments>http://redgreenandblue.org/2009/09/07/fifth-judge-for-chevron-amazon-hearing-withdraws/#comments</comments>
    <pubDate>Mon, 07 Sep 2009 17:35:10 +0000</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Kay Sexton</dc:creator>
    
		<category><![CDATA[Center]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Energy]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Leader]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Natural Resources]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Political Spectrum]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[World]]></category>

    <guid isPermaLink="false">http://redgreenandblue.org/2009/09/07/fifth-judge-for-chevron-amazon-hearing-withdraws/</guid>
    <description><![CDATA[<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0cm 0cm 0pt">
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0cm 0cm 0pt">
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0cm 0cm 0pt">
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0cm 0cm 0pt">
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0cm 0cm 0pt">
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0cm 0cm 0pt"><img class="alignleft alignnone size-full wp-image-3584" style="float: left" src="http://go635254.s3.amazonaws.com/redgreenandblue/files/2009/09/ecuador.jpg" alt="ecuador" width="250" height="375" />Judge Juan Nunez has recused himself in the case which focuses around claims that <a href="http://planetsave.com/blog/2009/06/02/the-most-destructive-project-on-earth-chevron-escapes-tar-oil-accountability/" target="_blank">Chevron</a> has been environmentally irresponsible in Ecuador’s <a href="http://planetsave.com/blog/2007/12/09/save-the-amazon-save-the-world/" target="_blank">Amazonian</a> rainforest. He is the fifth judge to leave the case. While he refuses to discuss the reasons he has disqualified himself from giving judgment in the case, there has been a flurry of claim and counterclaim around Chevron’s release of video in which he appears to say to members of the ruling Alianza Pais party that he will decide against Chevron, although judgment is not due to be given until October.</p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0cm 0cm 0pt">
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0cm 0cm 0pt">
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0cm 0cm 0pt">Chevron further alleges Nunez was to be given a $15 million ‘commission’ by the party, for deciding against the oil company. Judge Nunez says the video was manipulated – Chevron say it was not and that they will bring a counter-case against him for corruption.
<p><a href="http://redgreenandblue.org/2009/09/07/fifth-judge-for-chevron-amazon-hearing-withdraws/" class="more-link">Read more of this story &#187;</a></p>
]]></description>
    <wfw:commentRss>http://redgreenandblue.org/2009/09/07/fifth-judge-for-chevron-amazon-hearing-withdraws/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>McDonald&#8217;s Going Green?</title>
    <link>http://cleantechnica.com/2009/08/19/mcdonalds-going-green/</link>
    <comments>http://cleantechnica.com/2009/08/19/mcdonalds-going-green/#comments</comments>
    <pubDate>Wed, 19 Aug 2009 23:13:06 +0000</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Zachary Shahan</dc:creator>
    
		<category><![CDATA[agriculture]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[business]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[energy efficiency]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[water]]></category>

    <guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/2009/08/19/mcdonalds-going-green/</guid>
    <description><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://cleantechnica.com/files/2009/08/mcdonalds2.jpg"><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-3158" src="http://go635254.s3.amazonaws.com/cleantechnica/files/2009/08/mcdonalds2.jpg" alt="" width="500" height="375" /></a><br />
<strong></strong></p>
<p><strong>In recent posts on <a href="http://planetsave.com/blog/2009/07/30/greenpeace-praises-brazil/#more-4856" target="_blank">Planetsave</a> and <a href="http://ecoworldly.com/2009/08/17/worlds-largest-leather-exporter-backs-out-of-amazon/#more-3689" target="_blank">EcoWorldy</a> about moratoria on <a href="http://planetsave.com/blog/2009/07/30/greenpeace-praises-brazil/#more-4856" target="_blank">soya</a> and <a href="http://ecoworldly.com/2009/08/17/worlds-largest-leather-exporter-backs-out-of-amazon/#more-3689" target="_blank">cattle</a> products related to Amazon destruction, it was mentioned that McDonald&#8217;s is helping to save the Amazon. With the company also delving into green building, progressive energy saving software, and charging stations for electric vehicles, is McDonald&#8217;s a green company?</strong></p>
<p><a href="http://cleantechnica.com/2009/08/19/mcdonalds-going-green/" class="more-link">Read more of this story &#187;</a></p>
]]></description>
    <wfw:commentRss>http://cleantechnica.com/2009/08/19/mcdonalds-going-green/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>Can Ancient Architecture Help Amazonian Farmers?</title>
    <link>http://redgreenandblue.org/2009/08/19/can-ancient-architecture-help-amazonian-farmers/</link>
    <comments>http://redgreenandblue.org/2009/08/19/can-ancient-architecture-help-amazonian-farmers/#comments</comments>
    <pubDate>Wed, 19 Aug 2009 18:26:45 +0000</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Kay Sexton</dc:creator>
    
		<category><![CDATA[Center]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Climate Change]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Energy]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Leader]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Natural Resources]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Political Spectrum]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[World]]></category>

    <guid isPermaLink="false">http://redgreenandblue.org/2009/08/19/can-ancient-architecture-help-amazonian-farmers/</guid>
    <description><![CDATA[<p><img class="alignnone size-full wp-image-3533" src="http://go635254.s3.amazonaws.com/redgreenandblue/files/2009/08/bolivian-bread.jpg" alt="Bolivian market" width="500" height="375" /></p>
<p>Subsistence farmers in Bolivia have been given help to change their technology – moving away from pipe and sprinkle irrigation systems to an aeons-old technique of hand-built raised clay platforms that are surrounded by canals.</p>
<p>The platforms, called camellones, can be up to eight feet above the level of the fields they support, have two purposes: they protect seeds and crops from being washed away by <a href="http://planetsave.com/blog/2008/06/23/contaminants-in-flood-waters-threaten-food-part-i-who-is-watching/" target="_blank">floods</a> and the water stored in the canals can be used when the river system is low, to irrigate the crops.</p>
<p>The camellone construction system is pre-Columbian dating back to around 1000BC to AD1400, which shows that communities, then, as now, faced the problem of flooding succeeded by <a href="http://ecolocalizer.com/2009/04/01/what-defines-a-drought/" target="_blank">drought</a>. And this may have been one of the causes of collapse for those ancient cultures, because when workers were diverted from building and maintaining agricultural systems to joining armies, there may have been famines. In modern day Bolivia, serious floods in the past three years have caused more than £119 million of damage to agricultural systems. It&#8217;s hoped that with climate change driving more river flooding and more drought, reverting to old technology could help communities cope with water levels rising even as rains reduce.</p>
<p>Around 400 families have been supported by local and international charities to create camellones in five areas to grow corn, cassava and rice.  The first results look good, as the <a href="http://planetsave.com/blog/2007/12/09/save-the-amazon-save-the-world/" target="_blank">Amazonian</a> floods have now receded, and where the nutrients in the soil would normally be washed back into the river, the platforms have remained above the floods and conserved the rich vegetative topsoil that can grow better crops than the sandy subsoil.</p>
<h3>The downside of ancient systems</h3>
<p>If you’re thinking it all sounds too good to be true, you could very well be right. This kind of preliminary report on an agricultural or technological ‘throw-back’ is often followed by a bleak silence. The reasons for this are often more political than environmental and include:</p>
<p>1) The cost of investment in building and maintaining such systems, which is subsided by charities for three or five years and then the charity funding moves on and nobody is motivated to carry on the work<br />
2) The transfer of local power from hierarchical systems (which are often based on government or international aid and support) to individuals who may be low ranking, illiterate and unable to drive forward change outside their own behaviour<br />
3) The failure to recognise that while <a href="http://redgreenandblue.org/2009/04/28/food-security-and-wild-animal-protection-zimbabwe-struggles-to-find-the-balance/" target="_blank">subsistence farmers </a>claim to want to be self-sufficient, such projects tend to recruit the young, healthy and confident: all it takes is illness in the family, a child to win a scholarship or a vehicle or house to need substantial repairs and that family is likely to move away from growing crops to eat back into growing cash crops that generate income to meet their needs.<br />
4) Calls on local labour – if a road or resort is built nearby, all the available labour may be pulled from agriculture to work on the cash-generating project.</p>
<p>What such projects need is a longer term investment, along with social support to ensure that the community recognises that the new systems can deliver everything that cash crops or illegal forestry did.</p>
<p>Bolivan market courtesy of <a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/pfurlong/" target="_blank">PJFurlong06</a> at <a href="http://www.flickr.com/" target="_blank">Flickr</a> under a <a href="http://creativecommons.org/" target="_blank">Creative Commons Licence</a></p>
<p><strong>2. The number of e-books the average user is reading?</strong></p>
<p>This is also an important figure required for the analysis, as it helps to estimate the effectiveness of the Kindle in replacing paper books. The author decided to use the estimation of Forrester, which is that each consumer purchases three e-books a month, or total of 36 e-books a year. She then explains: &#8220;..so by adopting Forrester’s rate of three e-books a month, we forecast that the average consumer would purchase 144 e-books in four years, potentially displacing 1,074 kg of CO2.&#8221;</p>
<p>Based on that number and the assumption that every 1.6 e-books purchased replace 1 paper book, she gets to the figure of 22.5 books a year which is the breakeven point - you read more on your Kindle and you&#8217;re making it officially a greener alternative.</p>
<p>But will users read so many e-books? I doubt. This number is related to the number of books readers read (unless your assumption is that readers will read much more when they switch to e-books which is not the case here) and the number of books read in average tell a different story.</p>
<p>According to the report 1 billion books are sold every year in the U.S. With a population of about 300 million people it means every person in the U.S. is reading about 3.3 books a year (including babies which actually have many books, sometimes more than the average adult..). So as you can see there&#8217;s some difference between 3.3 books per a person, which is based on real figures and the estimation of the report - 36 books per a person.</p>
<p>Now, it might be that Forrester&#8217;s estimation (36 books) is correct, but it relates only to the avid readers which are the early adopters of the Kindle devices. What can happen to this number of books when 14.5 million units of e-readers will be sold in 2012? the report explains &#8220;Forrester estimates that each consumer purchases three e-books a month but that the average will drop when lower e-reader prices entice casual readers. Alternately, average purchases could increase as more books become available in electronic forms.&#8221;</p>
<p>Still, is it OK to use the figure of 36 books per a year as the average number of books read by users? How many people you know who read 3 books every month? I decided to further check it and found a survey of AP in 2007 that <a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/books/2007/aug/22/news">found the following</a>: &#8220;A quarter of US adults say they read no books at all in the past year, according to an Associated Press-Ipsos poll. The typical person claimed to have read four books in the last year and, excluding those who had not read any books at all, the usual number of books read was seven.&#8221;</p>
<p>Another source is the &#8216;<a href="http://www.greenpressinitiative.org/orderform.htm" target="_blank">Environmental Trends and Climate Impacts: Findings from the U.S. Book Industry</a>&#8216;, which mentions that 3.1 billion books were sold in 2006, which is an average of about 10 books per a person.</p>
<p>So even if we take the higher alternative estimation of 10 books per a year, we get that instead of getting fully offset after the first year of use, a Kindle is getting offset only after 2.25 years of use.</p>
<p>The bottom line of the report is very clear:</p>
<blockquote><p>The roughly 168 kg of CO2 produced throughout the Kindle’s lifecycle is a clear winner against the potential savings: 1,074 kg of CO2 if replacing three books a month for four years; and up to 26,098 kg of CO2 when used to the fullest capacity of the Kindle DX. Less-frequent readers attracted by decreasing prices still can break even at 22.5 books over the life of the device.</p></blockquote>
<p>So is the debate over? I&#8217;m afraid not. As much as the report contributes to clarify the debate on how green are e-readers, there are still some issues that need to be finalized as I showed here. I&#8217;m afraid that declaring the Kindle as a clear winner is still too early. The key to the podium is still in hands of Amazon - if they&#8217;ll provide us with their data on the Kindle&#8217;s footprint and maybe even life cycle analysis it would be then the right time to claim a winner.</p>
]]></description>
    <wfw:commentRss>http://redgreenandblue.org/2009/08/19/can-ancient-architecture-help-amazonian-farmers/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>World&#8217;s Largest Leather Exporter Backs Out of Amazon</title>
    <link>http://ecoworldly.com/2009/08/17/worlds-largest-leather-exporter-backs-out-of-amazon/</link>
    <comments>http://ecoworldly.com/2009/08/17/worlds-largest-leather-exporter-backs-out-of-amazon/#comments</comments>
    <pubDate>Mon, 17 Aug 2009 22:57:11 +0000</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Zachary Shahan</dc:creator>
    
		<category><![CDATA[About Animals]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[About Climate]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[About Economy]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[About Environment]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[About Politics]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[In Global]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[In The Americas]]></category>

    <guid isPermaLink="false">http://ecoworldly.com/2009/08/17/worlds-largest-leather-exporter-backs-out-of-amazon/</guid>
    <description><![CDATA[<p><a href='http://ecoworldly.com/files/2009/08/cattlebrazil44.jpg'><img src="http://go635254.s3.amazonaws.com/ecoworldly/files/2009/08/cattlebrazil44.jpg" alt="" width="448" height="298" class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-3695" /></a><br />
<strong>Just a couple of weeks ago, <a href="http://planetsave.com/blog/2009/07/30/greenpeace-praises-brazil/">soya traders agreed to extend a moratorium on buying soya linked to Amazon destruction</a>. However, as discussed in January, <a href="http://planetsave.com/blog/2009/01/29/80-percent-of-amazon-deforestation-stems-from-cattle-ranching-2/">80% of Amazon deforestation is from cattle farming</a>. With continued involvement of major international organizations and companies &#8212; Greenpeace, McDonald&#8217;s, Nike, Wal-Mart, and Carrefour &#8212; a giant leap in protection of the Amazon was made a few days ago.</strong></p>
<p><a href="http://ecoworldly.com/2009/08/17/worlds-largest-leather-exporter-backs-out-of-amazon/" class="more-link">Read more of this story &#187;</a></p>
]]></description>
    <wfw:commentRss>http://ecoworldly.com/2009/08/17/worlds-largest-leather-exporter-backs-out-of-amazon/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>Greenpeace Praises Brazil</title>
    <link>http://planetsave.com/blog/2009/07/30/greenpeace-praises-brazil/</link>
    <comments>http://planetsave.com/blog/2009/07/30/greenpeace-praises-brazil/#comments</comments>
    <pubDate>Thu, 30 Jul 2009 15:29:06 +0000</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Zachary Shahan</dc:creator>
    
		<category><![CDATA[Action &amp; Activism]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Climate change]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Environmental Policies]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[International]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Nature &amp; Conservation]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Planetsave]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>

    <guid isPermaLink="false">http://planetsave.com/blog/2009/07/30/greenpeace-praises-brazil/</guid>
    <description><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://planetsave.com/files/2009/07/amazon1.jpg"><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-4857" src="http://go635254.s3.amazonaws.com/planetsave/files/2009/07/amazon1.jpg" alt="" width="448" height="336" /></a></p>
<div><strong>Brazil soya traders agreed to extend a moratorium on buying soya linked to Amazon destruction this week and <a href="http://www.greenpeace.org/international/press/releases/soya-traders-extend-moratorium">Greenpeace was quick to give them a big thank you</a> from the world.</strong></div>
<p><strong> </strong></p>
<p><strong>International companies such as McDonald&#8217;s are happy, and companies like Nike, Wal-Mart and Carrefour are asking for more.<br />
</strong>
<p><a href="http://planetsave.com/blog/2009/07/30/greenpeace-praises-brazil/" class="more-link">Read more of this story &#187;</a></p>
]]></description>
    <wfw:commentRss>http://planetsave.com/blog/2009/07/30/greenpeace-praises-brazil/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>Timberland Leather Won&#8217;t Come from Amazonian Cattle</title>
    <link>http://planetsave.com/blog/2009/07/29/timberland-leather-wont-come-from-amazonian-cattle/</link>
    <comments>http://planetsave.com/blog/2009/07/29/timberland-leather-wont-come-from-amazonian-cattle/#comments</comments>
    <pubDate>Wed, 29 Jul 2009 22:05:24 +0000</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Bryan Nelson</dc:creator>
    
		<category><![CDATA[Action &amp; Activism]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Climate change]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Environmental Policies]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[International]]></category>

    <guid isPermaLink="false">http://planetsave.com/blog/2009/07/29/timberland-leather-wont-come-from-amazonian-cattle/</guid>
    <description><![CDATA[<p><a rel="attachment wp-att-4849" href="http://planetsave.com/blog/2009/07/29/timberland-leather-wont-come-from-amazonian-cattle/deforestation-2/"><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-4849" src="http://go635254.s3.amazonaws.com/planetsave/files/2009/07/deforestation.jpg" alt="Amazon deforestation" width="500" height="375" /></a></p>
<h3>Timberland has announced a new policy agreement with Greenpeace to ensure that leather used in new boots and shoes won&#8217;t contribute to deforestation in the Amazon.</h3>
<p>The policy will issue a moratorium on purchasing any cattle raised in newly deforested areas within the Amazon Rainforest, and it will force all of its suppliers to do the same.</p>
<p><a href="http://planetsave.com/blog/2009/07/29/timberland-leather-wont-come-from-amazonian-cattle/" class="more-link">Read more of this story &#187;</a></p>
]]></description>
    <wfw:commentRss>http://planetsave.com/blog/2009/07/29/timberland-leather-wont-come-from-amazonian-cattle/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>Save Amazon With Nuke Waste, Says Environmentalist</title>
    <link>http://ecoworldly.com/2009/07/27/save-amazon-with-nuke-waste-says-environmentalist/</link>
    <comments>http://ecoworldly.com/2009/07/27/save-amazon-with-nuke-waste-says-environmentalist/#comments</comments>
    <pubDate>Mon, 27 Jul 2009 00:45:40 +0000</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Susan Kraemer</dc:creator>
    
		<category><![CDATA[About Climate]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[About Environment]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[In The Americas]]></category>

    <guid isPermaLink="false">http://ecoworldly.com/2009/07/27/save-amazon-with-nuke-waste-says-environmentalist/</guid>
    <description><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://ecoworldly.com/files/2009/07/amazon_burning.jpg"><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-3318" src="http://go635254.s3.amazonaws.com/ecoworldly/files/2009/07/amazon_burning.jpg" alt="" width="500" height="343" /></a><br />
In desperate times, people look at desperate measures.</p>
<p>James Lovelock - - who is one of the leading environmentalists on the planet has made a startling proposal: <strong>that the best way to save the Amazon from being destroyed is to turn it into a repository for nuclear waste.</strong></p>
<p>He argues in &#8220;The Revenge of Gaia&#8221; that animals and plants don’t perceive radioactivity as a danger. What is far more threatening to ecosystems are people &#8212; who create extensive farming or mining and construction sites.  So to keep humans out of valuable ecosystems, we could dump our nuclear waste there.</p>
<h3>That will keep people out.</h3>
<p>Oddly, both plants and animals have increased around the areas of Belarus that were heavily radiated after the accident at Chernobyl, although radiation reduces their lifespan.</p>
<p><strong>The lack of human intervention may make nuclear wildlife refuges more beneficial overall:</strong></p>
<p><a href="http://ecoworldly.com/2009/07/27/save-amazon-with-nuke-waste-says-environmentalist/" class="more-link">Read more of this story &#187;</a></p>
]]></description>
    <wfw:commentRss>http://ecoworldly.com/2009/07/27/save-amazon-with-nuke-waste-says-environmentalist/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>Nike Stops Use of Amazon Leather After Damning Greenpeace Report</title>
    <link>http://planetsave.com/blog/2009/07/23/nike-stops-use-of-amazon-leather-after-damning-greenpeace-report/</link>
    <comments>http://planetsave.com/blog/2009/07/23/nike-stops-use-of-amazon-leather-after-damning-greenpeace-report/#comments</comments>
    <pubDate>Thu, 23 Jul 2009 09:53:53 +0000</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Andrew Williams</dc:creator>
    
		<category><![CDATA[Action &amp; Activism]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Nature &amp; Conservation]]></category>

    <guid isPermaLink="false">http://planetsave.com/blog/2009/07/23/nike-stops-use-of-amazon-leather-after-damning-greenpeace-report/</guid>
    <description><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://planetsave.com/files/2009/07/nike-amazon-leather-greenpeace.jpg"><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-4757" src="http://go635254.s3.amazonaws.com/planetsave/files/2009/07/nike-amazon-leather-greenpeace.jpg" alt="" width="500" height="375" /></a></p>

<p><strong><a title="nike" href="http://www.greenpeace.org.uk/media/press-releases/nike-agree-stop-buying-amazon-leather-following-greenpeace-report-20090722" target="_blank">Nike has stopped all imports of leather from the Amazon region of Brazil</a>, after a Greenpeace report claimed that its shoes and trainers could be speeding up the destruction of the world&#8217;s largest rainforest and contributing to global warming.</strong></p>
<p>The report, published last month, revealed how cattle hides from deforested areas were entering the supply chains of global brands including Nike, Clarks, Adidas and Reebok.</p>
<p>According to the NGO, deforestation for cattle ranching in Brazil alone is now the biggest driver of deforestation anywhere in the world.</p>
<p><a href="http://planetsave.com/blog/2009/07/23/nike-stops-use-of-amazon-leather-after-damning-greenpeace-report/" class="more-link">Read more of this story &#187;</a></p>
]]></description>
    <wfw:commentRss>http://planetsave.com/blog/2009/07/23/nike-stops-use-of-amazon-leather-after-damning-greenpeace-report/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>Green Jobs and Clean Energy: #1 Way to Lead the World</title>
    <link>http://planetsave.com/blog/2009/07/23/green-jobs-and-clean-energy-1-way-to-lead-world/</link>
    <comments>http://planetsave.com/blog/2009/07/23/green-jobs-and-clean-energy-1-way-to-lead-world/#comments</comments>
    <pubDate>Thu, 23 Jul 2009 09:50:06 +0000</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Zachary Shahan</dc:creator>
    
		<category><![CDATA[Climate change]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Energy &amp; Fuel]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Energy Conservation]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Environmental Policies]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[International]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Planetsave]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Renewable Energy]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Sustainability]]></category>

    <guid isPermaLink="false">http://planetsave.com/blog/2009/07/23/green-jobs-and-clean-energy-1-way-to-lead-world/</guid>
    <description><![CDATA[<p><a href='http://planetsave.com/files/2009/07/energycompressed.jpg'><img src="http://go635254.s3.amazonaws.com/planetsave/files/2009/07/energycompressed.jpg" alt="" width="448" height="336" class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-4755" /></a><br />
<strong>How long did the idea that green issues and the economy were in competition proliferate the US? For decades. Now, top-of-the-world entrepeneurs, the President of the United States, leading representatives in Congress, and research institutes are saying that green jobs and a green economy are the way to a healthy economy.</strong> Recent statements by Barbara Boxer (Senator from California), John Doerr (venture capitalist who helped to launch Google and Amazon.com), Obama, and a report by the Pew Charitable Trusts state that the only way to lead the world in the 21st century is to lead in green energy and green jobs.</p>
<p>In reference to Thomas Friedman&#8217;s book, <em>Hot, Flat and Crowded</em>, Boxer said yesterday: <a href="http://epw.senate.gov/public/index.cfm?FuseAction=Majority.PressReleases&#38;ContentRecord_id=a4aaaec9-802a-23ad-4d02-87fff493e98b&#38;Region_id=&#38;Issue_id="><strong>&#8220;The nation that aggressively addresses the issue of climate change will be the nation that will thrive, the nation that will lead, and the nation that will prosper.&#8221;</strong></a></p>
<p><a href="http://planetsave.com/blog/2009/07/23/green-jobs-and-clean-energy-1-way-to-lead-world/" class="more-link">Read more of this story &#187;</a></p>
]]></description>
    <wfw:commentRss>http://planetsave.com/blog/2009/07/23/green-jobs-and-clean-energy-1-way-to-lead-world/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>Vampire Bats Biting More People Due to Amazon Development</title>
    <link>http://ecoworldly.com/2009/07/20/vampire-bats-biting-more-people-due-to-amazon-development/</link>
    <comments>http://ecoworldly.com/2009/07/20/vampire-bats-biting-more-people-due-to-amazon-development/#comments</comments>
    <pubDate>Mon, 20 Jul 2009 22:21:17 +0000</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Bryan Nelson</dc:creator>
    
		<category><![CDATA[About Animals]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[In The Americas]]></category>

    <guid isPermaLink="false">http://ecoworldly.com/2009/07/20/vampire-bats-biting-more-people-due-to-amazon-development/</guid>
    <description><![CDATA[<p><a rel="attachment wp-att-3212" href="http://ecoworldly.com/2009/07/20/vampire-bats-biting-more-people-due-to-amazon-development/vampirebats/"><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-3212" src="http://go635254.s3.amazonaws.com/ecoworldly/files/2009/07/vampirebats.jpg" alt="Vampire Bats" width="500" height="333" /></a></p>
<h3>The decimation of the Amazon due to increased logging, mining and road construction is causing vampire bats in Peru to feast more regularly on the blood of humans.</h3>
<h4><em>National Geographic</em> has <a href="http://news.nationalgeographic.com/news/2009/07/090716-vampire-bats-missions-video-wc.html">reported</a> that as human population grows and local wildlife numbers decrease because of development throughout the region, vampire bats have no where else to turn but human blood. As a result, outbreaks of rabies are increasing, and it&#8217;s killing people in places where its occurrence has previously been rare.</h4>
<p><a href="http://ecoworldly.com/2009/07/20/vampire-bats-biting-more-people-due-to-amazon-development/" class="more-link">Read more of this story &#187;</a></p>
]]></description>
    <wfw:commentRss>http://ecoworldly.com/2009/07/20/vampire-bats-biting-more-people-due-to-amazon-development/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>Amazon River Dated at 11 Million Years Old</title>
    <link>http://ecoworldly.com/2009/07/09/amazon-river-dated-at-11-million-years-old/</link>
    <comments>http://ecoworldly.com/2009/07/09/amazon-river-dated-at-11-million-years-old/#comments</comments>
    <pubDate>Thu, 09 Jul 2009 06:57:28 +0000</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Bryan Nelson</dc:creator>
    
		<category><![CDATA[About Environment]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[In The Americas]]></category>

    <guid isPermaLink="false">http://ecoworldly.com/2009/07/09/amazon-river-dated-at-11-million-years-old/</guid>
    <description><![CDATA[<p><a rel="attachment wp-att-3133" href="http://ecoworldly.com/2009/07/09/amazon-river-dated-at-11-million-years-old/amazon/"><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-3133" src="http://go635254.s3.amazonaws.com/ecoworldly/files/2009/07/amazon.jpg" alt="Amazon" width="500" height="375" /></a></p>
<h3>A new drilling <a href="http://www.livescience.com/environment/090708-amazon-river.html">study</a> has definitively dated the Amazon River at over 11 million years old, and it has held its current form for at least the last 2.4 million years.</h3>
<h4>The Amazon is one of the two longest rivers in the world, and its flood basin is home to one third of all the species on Earth. Discovering the river&#8217;s age is a stark reminder of just how ancient and intertwined the Amazonian ecosystem is, including the immensely rich biodiversity which calls it home.</h4>
<p><a href="http://ecoworldly.com/2009/07/09/amazon-river-dated-at-11-million-years-old/" class="more-link">Read more of this story &#187;</a></p>
]]></description>
    <wfw:commentRss>http://ecoworldly.com/2009/07/09/amazon-river-dated-at-11-million-years-old/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>Crude Documentary at 52nd San Francisco International Film Festival</title>
    <link>http://sustainablog.org/2009/05/01/crude-documentary-at-52nd-san-francisco-international-film-festival/</link>
    <comments>http://sustainablog.org/2009/05/01/crude-documentary-at-52nd-san-francisco-international-film-festival/#comments</comments>
    <pubDate>Fri, 01 May 2009 16:22:22 +0000</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Keith Rockmael</dc:creator>
    
		<category><![CDATA[Action &amp; Activism]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Energy &amp; Fuel]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Environmental Policies]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[International]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Nature &amp; Conservation]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Video &amp; Media]]></category>

    <guid isPermaLink="false">http://sustainablog.org/2009/05/01/crude-documentary-at-52nd-san-francisco-international-film-festival/</guid>
    <description><![CDATA[<p style="text-align: center"><a href="http://sustainablog.org/files/2009/04/crude_filmstill_2.jpg"><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-4461" src="http://go635254.s3.amazonaws.com/sustainablog/files/2009/04/crude_filmstill_2.jpg" alt="" width="377" height="251" /></a><em>Photo by David Gilbert, <a href="http://www.uncontacted.com/">http://www.uncontacted.com/</a></em></p>
<p>A documentary or any feature film, like a good dessert, needs good texture. Some docs offer light delicate flavors, while others serve up crisp tawdry offerings but <a href="http://www.crudethemovie.com/">Crude</a>, the latest feature documentary from director <a href="http://www.imdb.com/name/nm0075666/">Joe Berlinger </a>(Brother’s Keeper, Metallica: Some Kind of Monster) brings a feel so viscous its some wonder that the film and the emotions within it don&#8217;t just ooze into the theater.</p>
<p>And why wouldn’t the film be viscous with center of the film swirling around a legal case about the <a href="http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=black+gold">black gold</a> being pumped out of the jungles of Ecuador. Some have called the case the “<a href="http://ecoworldly.com/2008/10/24/new-photo-book-proves-that-chevron-caused-ecuadors-amazon-chernobyl/">Amazon Chernobyl</a>” but whatever the name, Berlinger delves head first into this the David versus Goliath story that circles around one of the longest and most controversial legal (not to mention environmental and human rights) cases ever.
<p><a href="http://sustainablog.org/2009/05/01/crude-documentary-at-52nd-san-francisco-international-film-festival/" class="more-link">Read more of this story &#187;</a></p>
]]></description>
    <wfw:commentRss>http://sustainablog.org/2009/05/01/crude-documentary-at-52nd-san-francisco-international-film-festival/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>How Technology is Helping Reduce Fossil Fuel Consumption</title>
    <link>http://inspiredeconomist.com/2009/04/30/how-technology-is-helping-reduce-fossil-fuel-consumption/</link>
    <comments>http://inspiredeconomist.com/2009/04/30/how-technology-is-helping-reduce-fossil-fuel-consumption/#comments</comments>
    <pubDate>Thu, 30 Apr 2009 23:44:53 +0000</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Brenda Keener</dc:creator>
    
		<category><![CDATA[Innovation and Design]]></category>

    <guid isPermaLink="false">http://inspiredeconomist.com/2009/04/30/how-technology-is-helping-reduce-fossil-fuel-consumption/</guid>
    <description><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://inspiredeconomist.com/files/2009/04/600px-globe_svg.png"><img class="alignleft size-medium wp-image-1429" src="http://go635254.s3.amazonaws.com/inspiredeconomist/files/2009/04/600px-globe_svg-300x300.png" alt="" width="300" height="300" /></a>For years, green activists were &#8220;anti-technology&#8221;, claiming that technological advances were largely responsible for the polluted state of Mother Earth. This was a fair claim, as yesterday&#8217;s technologies only looked at the bottom line, and not the resulting mess. In today&#8217;s reality, the words &#8220;green&#8221; and &#8220;technology&#8221; no longer constitute an oxymoron, as technologists have turned their attention to cleaning up the mess previous generations have made.  </p>
<p>In some cases, technology&#8217;s contribution to greening the earth has been largely accidental.  Most of us use our automobiles for only a few things; grocery shopping, going to work, going to visit friends, comparison shopping, and visiting places of amusement.
<p><a href="http://inspiredeconomist.com/2009/04/30/how-technology-is-helping-reduce-fossil-fuel-consumption/" class="more-link">Read more of this story &#187;</a></p>
]]></description>
    <wfw:commentRss>http://inspiredeconomist.com/2009/04/30/how-technology-is-helping-reduce-fossil-fuel-consumption/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>Brazil Set to Flood Rainforest, Displace Thousands</title>
    <link>http://ecoworldly.com/2009/04/20/brazil-set-to-flood-rainforest-displace-thousands/</link>
    <comments>http://ecoworldly.com/2009/04/20/brazil-set-to-flood-rainforest-displace-thousands/#comments</comments>
    <pubDate>Mon, 20 Apr 2009 15:33:17 +0000</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Jerry James Stone</dc:creator>
    
		<category><![CDATA[About Environment]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[In The Americas]]></category>

    <guid isPermaLink="false">http://ecoworldly.com/2009/04/20/brazil-set-to-flood-rainforest-displace-thousands/</guid>
    <description><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://ecoworldly.com/files/2009/04/2505189970_dc7d9dc8bf_o.jpg"><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-2812" src="http://go635254.s3.amazonaws.com/ecoworldly/files/2009/04/2505189970_dc7d9dc8bf_o.jpg" alt="" width="500" height="356" /></a></p>
<p>The Xingu River &#8212; home to some 600 species of fish &#8212; is one of the largest tributaries running through the Amazon. But not if the Brazilian state power company has their way.</p>
<p>What would be the world&#8217;s third largest <span class="__mozilla-findbar-search" style="padding: 0pt;font-size: inherit;color: black">dam</span>, called the Belo Monte, would flood over 200 square miles of tropical rainforest; about the size of Tucson, AZ. It would also <strong>flood the homes of 19,000 people</strong>.
<p><a href="http://ecoworldly.com/2009/04/20/brazil-set-to-flood-rainforest-displace-thousands/" class="more-link">Read more of this story &#187;</a></p>
]]></description>
    <wfw:commentRss>http://ecoworldly.com/2009/04/20/brazil-set-to-flood-rainforest-displace-thousands/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>Earth Policy Institute: Protecting and Restoring Forests</title>
    <link>http://sustainablog.org/2009/04/14/earth-policy-institute-protecting-and-restoring-forests/</link>
    <comments>http://sustainablog.org/2009/04/14/earth-policy-institute-protecting-and-restoring-forests/#comments</comments>
    <pubDate>Tue, 14 Apr 2009 21:44:08 +0000</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Earth Policy Institute</dc:creator>
    
		<category><![CDATA[Environmental Policies]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Nature &amp; Conservation]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Recycling]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Sustainability]]></category>

    <guid isPermaLink="false">http://sustainablog.org/2009/04/14/earth-policy-institute-protecting-and-restoring-forests/</guid>
    <description><![CDATA[<p class="aBodyBlack2"><a href="http://sustainablog.org/files/2009/04/forestfog.jpg"><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-4412" src="http://go635254.s3.amazonaws.com/sustainablog/files/2009/04/forestfog.jpg" alt="fog in a forest" width="500" height="379" /></a><strong>By Lester R. Brown</strong></p>
<p><span class="aBodyBlack3">Protecting the earth’s nearly 4 billion hectares of remaining forests and replanting those already lost are both essential for restoring the earth’s health, an important foundation for the new economy. Reducing rainfall runoff and the associated flooding and soil erosion, recycling rainfall inland, and restoring aquifer recharge depend on simultaneously reducing pressure on forests and on reforestation.</span></p>
<p><strong>There is a vast unrealized potential in all countries to lessen the demands that are shrinking the earth’s forest cover. In industrial nations the greatest opportunity lies in reducing the quantity of wood used to make paper, and in developing countries it depends on reducing fuelwood use.</strong></p>
<p>The rates of paper recycling in the top 10 paper-producing countries range widely, from China and Finland on the low end, recycling 33 and 38 percent of the paper they use, to South Korea and Germany on the high end, at 77 and 66 percent. The United States, the world’s largest paper consumer, is far behind South Korea, but it has raised the share of paper recycled from roughly one fourth in the early 1980s to 50 percent in 2005. If every country recycled as much of its paper as South Korea does, the amount of wood pulp used to produce paper worldwide would drop by one third.</p>
<p>The use of paper, perhaps more than any other single product, reflects the throwaway mentality that evolved during the last century. There is an enormous possibility for reducing paper use simply by replacing facial tissues, paper napkins, disposable diapers, and paper shopping bags with reusable cloth alternatives.</p>
<p><a href="http://sustainablog.org/2009/04/14/earth-policy-institute-protecting-and-restoring-forests/" class="more-link">Read more of this story &#187;</a></p>
]]></description>
    <wfw:commentRss>http://sustainablog.org/2009/04/14/earth-policy-institute-protecting-and-restoring-forests/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>Brazil to Build 7-Mile Wall Around Poor Neighborhood to Halt Deforestation</title>
    <link>http://ecoworldly.com/2009/04/05/brazil-to-build-7-mile-wall-around-poor-neighborhood-to-halt-deforestation/</link>
    <comments>http://ecoworldly.com/2009/04/05/brazil-to-build-7-mile-wall-around-poor-neighborhood-to-halt-deforestation/#comments</comments>
    <pubDate>Sun, 05 Apr 2009 11:41:44 +0000</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>The Guardian Environment Network</dc:creator>
    
		<category><![CDATA[About Society]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[In The Americas]]></category>

    <guid isPermaLink="false">http://ecoworldly.com/2009/04/05/brazil-to-build-7-mile-wall-around-poor-neighborhood-to-halt-deforestation/</guid>
    <description><![CDATA[<h3><a href="http://ecoworldly.com/files/2009/04/dona-marta-favela-rio.jpg"><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-2764" src="http://go635254.s3.amazonaws.com/ecoworldly/files/2009/04/dona-marta-favela-rio.jpg" alt="Dona Marta  Favela, Rio" width="500" height="375" /></a>The Rio state government will build concrete walls around some of the city&#8217;s biggest slums (pictured on the hillside above) in an attempt to halt <a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/environment/deforestation">deforestation</a> of the surrounding jungle, officials said.</h3>
<p>Seven miles of walls, reaching a height of three metres (10ft) will be built around sections of at least 11 slums this year, Icaro Moreno, the president of the state&#8217;s public works department, said.</p>
<p><a href="http://ecoworldly.com/2009/04/05/brazil-to-build-7-mile-wall-around-poor-neighborhood-to-halt-deforestation/" class="more-link">Read more of this story &#187;</a></p>
]]></description>
    <wfw:commentRss>http://ecoworldly.com/2009/04/05/brazil-to-build-7-mile-wall-around-poor-neighborhood-to-halt-deforestation/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>They Killed Sister Dorothy</title>
    <link>http://sustainablog.org/2009/03/19/they-killed-sister-dorothy/</link>
    <comments>http://sustainablog.org/2009/03/19/they-killed-sister-dorothy/#comments</comments>
    <pubDate>Thu, 19 Mar 2009 14:52:07 +0000</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Leslie Berliant</dc:creator>
    
		<category><![CDATA[International]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Nature &amp; Conservation]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Video &amp; Media]]></category>

    <guid isPermaLink="false">http://sustainablog.org/2009/03/19/they-killed-sister-dorothy/</guid>
    <description><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://sustainablog.org/files/2009/03/widedorothyingarden-jpg-1.jpg"><img class="alignleft size-medium wp-image-4313" src="http://go635254.s3.amazonaws.com/sustainablog/files/2009/03/widedorothyingarden-jpg-1-300x200.jpg" alt="Sister Dorothy" width="300" height="200" /></a></p>
<h3>Next Wednesday night, March 25th, tune into HBO2’s premiere of the documentary <a href="http://www.theykilledsisterdorothy.com/">They Killed Sister Dorothy</a> at 8 pm if you want to begin to understand the violence and injustice that surrounds the destruction of the Amazon rainforest. If you aren&#8217;t going to be home, then set your Tivo.</h3>
<p>I was fortunate enough to see Daniel Junge’s film last month at the City of the Angels Film Festival in Los Angeles. The documentary follows the aftermath of the murder of 73 year-old Sister Dorothy Stang, known as the Angel of the Amazon, a Catholic nun and rainforest activist shot in the back while trying to empower local communities to set up sustainable farms while fighting illegal logging and land grabs.</p>
<p><a href="http://sustainablog.org/2009/03/19/they-killed-sister-dorothy/" class="more-link">Read more of this story &#187;</a></p>
]]></description>
    <wfw:commentRss>http://sustainablog.org/2009/03/19/they-killed-sister-dorothy/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
  </item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- 711 queries in 2.339 seconds. -->