<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
  xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
  xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
  >

<channel>
  <title>Green Options &#187; ANWR</title>
  <link>http://greenoptions.com/tag/anwr</link>
  <description>Posts tagged 'ANWR'</description>
  <pubDate>Wed, 04 Feb 2009 22:56:08 +0000</pubDate>
  <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
  <language>en</language>
  <item>
    <title>Palin&#8217;s Clean Energy &#8220;Plan&#8221; for Alaska Takes Backseat to ANWR</title>
    <link>http://redgreenandblue.org/2009/02/04/palins-clean-energy-plan-for-alaska-takes-backseat-to-anwr/</link>
    <comments>http://redgreenandblue.org/2009/02/04/palins-clean-energy-plan-for-alaska-takes-backseat-to-anwr/#comments</comments>
    <pubDate>Wed, 04 Feb 2009 22:56:08 +0000</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Timothy B. Hurst</dc:creator>
    
		<category><![CDATA[Energy]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Leader]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Liberal]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Natural Resources]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Policy]]></category>

    <guid isPermaLink="false">http://redgreenandblue.org/2009/02/04/palins-clean-energy-plan-for-alaska-takes-backseat-to-anwr/</guid>
    <description><![CDATA[<p style="text-align: center"><a href="http://redgreenandblue.org/files/2009/01/bear_pipeline.jpg"><img class="alignnone size-full wp-image-2244 aligncenter" src="http://go635254.s3.amazonaws.com/redgreenandblue/files/2009/01/bear_pipeline.jpg" alt="bear on alaska pipeline" width="500" height="399" /></a></p>
<h4><strong>Alaska Governor Sarah Palin released an energy plan for Alaska that some might consider more of an abdication of state responsibilities than an actual &#8216;plan&#8217;.<br />
</strong></h4>
<p>In an effort to re-brand herself as a serious proponent of renewable energy, Sarah Palin has outlined a plan to get half of the state&#8217;s power from renewable sources. But be forewarned, I use the terms &#8220;outline&#8221; and &#8220;plan&#8221; loosely.</p>
<p>&#8220;Renewable sources will play a large role in helping Alaska meet its future energy needs, <a href="http://www.alaskajournal.com/stories/012309/leg_img_8001.shtml">said Palin last week</a>.</p>
<p>While the plan has been praised by <a href="http://www.juneauempire.com/stories/011809/loc_378660723.shtml">praised by some as &#8220;very forward-thinking,&#8221;</a> it doesn&#8217;t really provide a clear road map for getting to the goal of achieving fifty percent renewables. Rather, it identifies numerous areas in which the state could develop alternative energy.
<p><a href="http://redgreenandblue.org/2009/02/04/palins-clean-energy-plan-for-alaska-takes-backseat-to-anwr/" class="more-link">Read more of this story &#187;</a></p>
]]></description>
    <wfw:commentRss>http://redgreenandblue.org/2009/02/04/palins-clean-energy-plan-for-alaska-takes-backseat-to-anwr/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>Jackie Mason Lectures Young Green on Energy Policy and Oil Prices [video]</title>
    <link>http://redgreenandblue.org/2009/01/29/jackie-mason-lectures-young-green-on-energy-policy-and-oil-prices-video/</link>
    <comments>http://redgreenandblue.org/2009/01/29/jackie-mason-lectures-young-green-on-energy-policy-and-oil-prices-video/#comments</comments>
    <pubDate>Fri, 30 Jan 2009 05:14:00 +0000</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Timothy B. Hurst</dc:creator>
    
		<category><![CDATA[Conservative]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Energy]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Leader]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Natural Resources]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Video]]></category>

    <guid isPermaLink="false">http://redgreenandblue.org/2009/01/29/jackie-mason-lectures-young-green-on-energy-policy-and-oil-prices-video/</guid>
    <description><![CDATA[<p style="text-align: left">Jackie Mason talks with a young man about the presidency of Barack Obama, the past eight years of Bush-era energy policy, and the environmental impacts of drilling for oil in Alaska. Mason&#8217;s take on the land use changes from oil development sounded a lot like the line of argument we heard from <a href="http://redgreenandblue.org/2008/09/02/palin-disparages-environmentalist-fear-mongering-yet-warns-of-a-world-of-hurt-if-we-dont-drill/">Sarah Palin</a>, <a href="http://dotearth.blogs.nytimes.com/2008/07/17/whos-backing-gingrichs-drill-here-drill-now-push/">Newt Gingrich</a> and the rest of the &#8216;drill here, drill now,&#8217; <a href="http://redgreenandblue.org/2008/09/04/drill-baby-drill-republicans-try-out-stupid-new-catchphrase/">drill-baby-drill</a> crowd throughout 2008.</p>
<p style="text-align: center">This post contains additional media. <a href="http://redgreenandblue.org/2009/01/29/jackie-mason-lectures-young-green-on-energy-policy-and-oil-prices-video/">Click here to view the full post</a>.</p>
]]></description>
    <wfw:commentRss>http://redgreenandblue.org/2009/01/29/jackie-mason-lectures-young-green-on-energy-policy-and-oil-prices-video/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>The Sarah Palin Chronicles: From A to Z</title>
    <link>http://redgreenandblue.org/2008/10/27/the-sarah-palin-chronicles-from-a-to-z/</link>
    <comments>http://redgreenandblue.org/2008/10/27/the-sarah-palin-chronicles-from-a-to-z/#comments</comments>
    <pubDate>Tue, 28 Oct 2008 05:43:44 +0000</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Jerry James Stone</dc:creator>
    
		<category><![CDATA[Liberal]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[US Election]]></category>

    <guid isPermaLink="false">http://redgreenandblue.org/2008/10/27/the-sarah-palin-chronicles-from-a-to-z/</guid>
    <description><![CDATA[<h3>Sarah Palin quotes from across the spectrum: from man not causing global warming, to the war in Iraq being a task from God, and how offshore drilling will save us - she says it all.</h3>
<p style="text-align: center"><img class="aligncenter" src="http://go635254.s3.amazonaws.com/redgreenandblue/files/2008/09/sarah-palin.jpg" alt="" width="500" height="375" /></p>
<p><strong>1.  <a href="http://redgreenandblue.org/2008/09/20/the-sarah-palin-chronicles-in-her-own-words/">Introduction</a></strong><br />
It’s obvious why Sarah Palin got the VP nod. And Saturday Night Live makes this point most brilliantly: Hillary Clinton.</p>
<p><strong>2.</strong><strong><span style="color: #888888"> <a href="http://redgreenandblue.org/2008/09/21/the-sarah-palin-chronicles-the-environment-part-two/">Sarah Palin On The Environment</a></span></strong><br />
Just one day before being picked as the <a href="http://planetsave.com/blog/2008/09/12/palin-tells-schwarzenegger-to-veto-bill-aimed-at-port-pollution/">GOP </a>vice president, she wrote a letter to <a href="http://www.grist.org/news/2008/09/12/palin_port/index.html?source=twitter">California Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger</a> urging him to shoot down policy aimed at pollution.</p>
<p><strong>3.  <a href="http://redgreenandblue.org/2008/09/22/the-sarah-palin-chronicles-show-us-your-ethics-part-three/">Sarah Palin On Ethics</a></strong><br />
Palin’s record is already dirty enough to warrant a trip to the free clinic, and that’s just as Governor! What is she capable of if elected as VP?</p>
<p><strong>4.  <a href="http://redgreenandblue.org/2008/10/07/the-sarah-palin-chronicles-on-energy-and-big-oil-part-four/">Sarah Palin On Energy and Big Oil</a></strong><br />
Sarah Palin dismisses alternative energy in favor of a pipeline built by God.</p>
<p><strong>5.  <a href="http://redgreenandblue.org/2008/10/19/the-sarah-palin-chronicles-foreign-policy-part-five/">Sarah Palin On Foreign Policy</a></strong><br />
<a href="http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/27265369/">Colin Powell</a> is jumping party lines because of Palin - can we afford her on the job training?</p>
<p>Image Credit: bobster1985 via flickr</p>
]]></description>
    <wfw:commentRss>http://redgreenandblue.org/2008/10/27/the-sarah-palin-chronicles-from-a-to-z/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>Palin Ignored Chance to Promote US Energy Independence</title>
    <link>http://redgreenandblue.org/2008/10/12/palin-ignored-chance-to-promote-us-energy-independence/</link>
    <comments>http://redgreenandblue.org/2008/10/12/palin-ignored-chance-to-promote-us-energy-independence/#comments</comments>
    <pubDate>Mon, 13 Oct 2008 01:38:04 +0000</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Alex Felsinger</dc:creator>
    
		<category><![CDATA[Energy]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Leader]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Liberal]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[US Election]]></category>

    <guid isPermaLink="false">http://redgreenandblue.org/2008/10/12/palin-ignored-chance-to-promote-us-energy-independence/</guid>
    <description><![CDATA[<h3>As Governor, Sarah Palin has successfully maintained Alaska&#8217;s energy <a href="http://www.salon.com/news/feature/2008/10/10/palin_chryson/" target="_blank">independence</a>, but at the same time, she has essentially ignored the mainland&#8217;s energy concerns.</h3>
<p><a href="http://redgreenandblue.org/files/2008/10/palin.jpg"><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-1305" src="http://go635254.s3.amazonaws.com/redgreenandblue/files/2008/10/palin.jpg" alt="" width="470" height="313" /></a></p>
<p><strong><a href="http://www.time.com/time/politics/article/0,8599,1849383,00.html?imw=Y" target="_blank">Time Magazine reports</a> that as Governor, Palin supported the direct export of enough clean natural gas to supply 1.4 million Americans for two years.</strong></p>
<p>In early 2007, an Alaskan liquefied natural gas plant owned by Marathon Oil and ConocoPhillips requested Department of Energy permission to export some of the fuel. Palin entered the discussion in April, but only to ensure that Alaska&#8217;s natural gas needs would be included in the deal.</p>
<p><a href="http://redgreenandblue.org/search/?q=energy+independence"><strong>&#62;&#62;More on energy independence at RG&#38;B</strong></a></p>
<p><a href="http://redgreenandblue.org/2008/10/12/palin-ignored-chance-to-promote-us-energy-independence/" class="more-link">Read more of this story &#187;</a></p>
]]></description>
    <wfw:commentRss>http://redgreenandblue.org/2008/10/12/palin-ignored-chance-to-promote-us-energy-independence/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>Is Sarah Palin Really &#8220;&#8230;one of the foremost experts in this nation on energy issues?&#8221; [w/video]</title>
    <link>http://redgreenandblue.org/2008/10/10/is-sarah-palin-really-one-of-the-foremost-experts-in-this-nation-on-energy-issues-wvideo/</link>
    <comments>http://redgreenandblue.org/2008/10/10/is-sarah-palin-really-one-of-the-foremost-experts-in-this-nation-on-energy-issues-wvideo/#comments</comments>
    <pubDate>Fri, 10 Oct 2008 13:00:56 +0000</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Timothy B. Hurst</dc:creator>
    
		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Choice]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Energy]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Liberal]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[US Election]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Video]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[World]]></category>

    <guid isPermaLink="false">http://redgreenandblue.org/2008/10/10/is-sarah-palin-really-one-of-the-foremost-experts-in-this-nation-on-energy-issues-wvideo/</guid>
    <description><![CDATA[<p>A day after the second presidential debate, both components of the Republican ticket for the executive sat down with <em>Fox News</em>&#8216; Sean Hannity to discuss, among other things, energy policy. In the interview, John Mccain said Sarah Palin was &#8220;&#8230;probably one of the most foremost experts in this nation on energy issues.&#8221;</p>
<p>Mccain elaborates:
<p><a href="http://redgreenandblue.org/2008/10/10/is-sarah-palin-really-one-of-the-foremost-experts-in-this-nation-on-energy-issues-wvideo/" class="more-link">Read more of this story &#187;</a></p>
]]></description>
    <wfw:commentRss>http://redgreenandblue.org/2008/10/10/is-sarah-palin-really-one-of-the-foremost-experts-in-this-nation-on-energy-issues-wvideo/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>The Sarah Palin Chronicles: On Energy and Big Oil, Part Four</title>
    <link>http://redgreenandblue.org/2008/10/07/the-sarah-palin-chronicles-on-energy-and-big-oil-part-four/</link>
    <comments>http://redgreenandblue.org/2008/10/07/the-sarah-palin-chronicles-on-energy-and-big-oil-part-four/#comments</comments>
    <pubDate>Wed, 08 Oct 2008 01:37:25 +0000</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Jerry James Stone</dc:creator>
    
		<category><![CDATA[Energy]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Liberal]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[US Election]]></category>

    <guid isPermaLink="false">http://redgreenandblue.org/2008/10/07/the-sarah-palin-chronicles-on-energy-and-big-oil-part-four/</guid>
    <description><![CDATA[<h3>Sarah Palin dismisses alternative energy in favor of a pipeline built by God.</h3>
<p><a href="http://redgreenandblue.org/files/2008/10/2370456791_54ea1eafc9_o.jpg"><img class="alignleft size-full wp-image-1253" style="float: left" src="http://go635254.s3.amazonaws.com/redgreenandblue/files/2008/10/2370456791_54ea1eafc9_o.jpg" alt="" width="530" height="367" /></a><strong></strong></p>
<h3><a href="http://redgreenandblue.org/search/?q=palin+president"><br />
More on Palin</a> &#62;&#62;</h3>
<p><strong>From <a href="http://thinkprogress.org/palin-digest/#energy">Think Progress</a></strong></p>
<p><strong>Palin’s First Statewide Campaign Was Fueled By Veco.</strong> “While mayor of Wasilla, Palin ran for lieutenant governor in 2002. She gathered $5,000 — or about 10 percent of her campaign fund — from Veco officials or their wives along the way.” [Anchorage Daily News, <a href="http://dwb.adn.com/front/story/8162137p-8054973c.html">9/6/06</a>]</p>
<p><strong>Palin’s Inauguration Was Sponsored By BP.</strong> Beyond Petroleum Exploration Inc. is listed by the Alaska Inaugural Committee as a sponsor of Palin’s 2007 Governor’s Balls. [<a href="http://www.alaskainauguralcommittee.org/sponsors.htm">Alaska Inaugural Committee</a>]</p>
<p><strong>Palin Is A Top Arctic Wildlife Refuge Drilling Advocate.</strong> Palin said she thinks McCain is “going to evolve into, eventually, supporting ANWR opening also” and “I’d like the opportunity to get to change his mind about ANWR.” [Kudlow &#38; Co., <a href="http://kudlowsmoneypolitics.blogspot.com/2008/06/drill-drill-drill-my-interview-with_26.html">6/25/08</a>]</p>
<p><strong>Palin Opposes Lieberman’s Bill To Prevent Arctic Refuge Drilling.</strong> In a letter to Congress opposing the Arctic Wilderness Act (S. 2316), Palin wrote that “as a citizen of the United States” she believes “development [of the Refuge] should be authorized.” [Letter to Sen. Akaka, <a href="http://www.anwr.org/archives/ANWR_Ltr_to_US_Senate.pdf">11/9/07</a>]</p>
<p><strong>Palin Dismisses Alternative Energy.</strong> Palin said that “Congress needs to lift the ban on drilling” because “alternative-energy solutions are far from imminent and would require more than 10 years to develop.” [Charleston Post and Courier, <a href="http://www.charleston.net/news/2008/aug/16/alaska_gov_wants_tap_oil_resources51051/">8/16/08</a>]</p>
<p><strong>Palin Believes It Is ‘God’s Will’ To Build A Natural Gas Pipeline.</strong> Speaking to the Wasilla Assembly of God church in June, Palin said, “I think God’s will has to be done in unifying people and companies to get that gas line built, so pray for that,” referring to a $30 billion national gas pipeline project. [Huffington Post, <a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2008/09/02/palins-church-may-have-sh_n_123205.html">9/2/08</a>]</p>
<p>Related posts:</p>
<p><a href="../2008/09/11/sex-lies-and-oilgate-a-crude-analysis-part-one/">Sex, Lies and Oilgate: A Crude Analysis (Part One)</a><br />
<a href="../2008/09/22/mccains-13-car-footprint/">McCain’s 13-Car Footprint</a><br />
<a href="../2008/09/03/setting-the-record-straight-sarah-palin-and-the-bridge-to-nowhere/">Setting the Record Straight:  Sarah Palin and the Bridge to Nowhere</a></p>
<p>Image source: <a href="http://flickr.com/photos/chovy/2370456791/"><strong>Chovee </strong></a>on <strong><a href="http://flickr.com/">Flickr</a></strong></p>
<p>&#60;&#60; Previous Post: <a href="http://redgreenandblue.org/2008/09/22/the-sarah-palin-chronicles-show-us-your-ethics-part-three/">On Ethics, Part Three</a> &#124; Foreign Policy, Part Five: Next Post &#62;&#62;<a href="../2008/09/20/the-sarah-palin-chronicles-in-her-own-words/"><br />
</a></p>
]]></description>
    <wfw:commentRss>http://redgreenandblue.org/2008/10/07/the-sarah-palin-chronicles-on-energy-and-big-oil-part-four/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>Mean Joe Green #29: Promote Renewables Baby, Promote Renewables!</title>
    <link>http://redgreenandblue.org/2008/10/04/mean-joe-green-29-promote-renewables-baby-promote-renewables/</link>
    <comments>http://redgreenandblue.org/2008/10/04/mean-joe-green-29-promote-renewables-baby-promote-renewables/#comments</comments>
    <pubDate>Sat, 04 Oct 2008 10:13:33 +0000</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Joe Mohr</dc:creator>
    
		<category><![CDATA[Cartoons]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Climate Change]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Energy]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Leader]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Liberal]]></category>

    <guid isPermaLink="false">http://redgreenandblue.org/2008/10/04/mean-joe-green-29-promote-renewables-baby-promote-renewables/</guid>
    <description><![CDATA[<h3>5 reasons not to drill for oil off our nation&#8217;s shores:</h3>
<p>1) <strong>Renewables and Alternative Fuels</strong>&#8211;It is a distraction from the dire need to promote renewables and move to a clean, energy independent future.<br />
2) <strong>Short Term Solution</strong>&#8211;We live in a country that has <a href="http://www.census.gov/main/www/popclock.html">4.5% of the world&#8217;s population</a> and uses 25% of the world&#8217;s oil. Any oil found would simply be a short term solution. The time and money spent searching and drilling would be better spent promoting renewable energy and alternative fuels.<br />
3) <strong>Price at the Pump</strong>&#8211;We wouldn&#8217;t save at the pump for about a decade, and even then the <a href="http://www.time.com/time/business/article/0,8599,1815884,00.html">savings would be only a few cents</a>.<br />
4) <strong>Marine Life</strong>&#8211;Drilling offshore would negatively impact delicate marine ecosystems. Plus, the<a href="http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/americas/7460767.stm"> US government recently calculated</a> there was a 33-51% chance of a major spill in the lifetime of an offshore oil and gas lease in the Chukchi Sea off Alaska. Thems not good odds!<br />
5) <strong>Climate Change</strong>&#8211;As Jerry James Stone said in a comment <a href="http://redgreenandblue.org/2008/08/21/dont-be-fuelish-offshore-drilling-will-only-leave-us-screwed/">in his recent Red Green and Blue article </a>&#8220;the offshore solution does not address our climate crisis. We would still be burning the same amount of fossil fuel, and that is BAD!&#8221;</p>
<p><a href="http://redgreenandblue.org/2008/10/04/mean-joe-green-29-promote-renewables-baby-promote-renewables/" class="more-link">Read more of this story &#187;</a></p>
]]></description>
    <wfw:commentRss>http://redgreenandblue.org/2008/10/04/mean-joe-green-29-promote-renewables-baby-promote-renewables/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>Energy Might Be the Explosive Topic of the Biden-Palin Debate</title>
    <link>http://redgreenandblue.org/2008/10/01/energy-might-be-the-explosive-topic-of-the-biden-palin-debate/</link>
    <comments>http://redgreenandblue.org/2008/10/01/energy-might-be-the-explosive-topic-of-the-biden-palin-debate/#comments</comments>
    <pubDate>Thu, 02 Oct 2008 04:18:41 +0000</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Levi Novey</dc:creator>
    
		<category><![CDATA[Center]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Choice]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[US Election]]></category>

    <guid isPermaLink="false">http://redgreenandblue.org/2008/10/01/energy-might-be-the-explosive-topic-of-the-biden-palin-debate/</guid>
    <description><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://redgreenandblue.org/files/2008/10/biden-and-palin-debating.jpg"><img class="alignleft size-full wp-image-1182" src="http://go635254.s3.amazonaws.com/redgreenandblue/files/2008/10/biden-and-palin-debating.jpg" alt="Biden and Palin Speaking" width="302" height="243" /></a><strong>With the economy tanking, several wars being fought abroad, climate change producing devastating hurricanes, and <a href="http://redgreenandblue.org/2008/10/01/imagine-a-700-billion-bailout-for-the-environment/" target="_self">strengthened calls</a> for a <a href="http://redgreenandblue.org/2008/10/01/why-van-jones-should-be-obamas-secretary-of-prosperity/" target="_self">sustainable economy</a>, energy has become one of the strong links that binds all of these issues. In anticipation of tomorrow night&#8217;s vice-presidential debate, it&#8217;s probably a safe bet to put your money on energy as one of the topics that&#8217;s likely to fire up the discussion.</strong></p>
<p><strong> Here&#8217;s why:</strong>
<p><a href="http://redgreenandblue.org/2008/10/01/energy-might-be-the-explosive-topic-of-the-biden-palin-debate/" class="more-link">Read more of this story &#187;</a></p>
]]></description>
    <wfw:commentRss>http://redgreenandblue.org/2008/10/01/energy-might-be-the-explosive-topic-of-the-biden-palin-debate/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>Big Oil&#8217;s Land Leases: Why Do We Need Offshore Drilling and ANWR?</title>
    <link>http://ecoscraps.com/2008/09/04/big-oils-land-leases-why-do-we-need-offshore-drilling-and-anwr/</link>
    <comments>http://ecoscraps.com/2008/09/04/big-oils-land-leases-why-do-we-need-offshore-drilling-and-anwr/#comments</comments>
    <pubDate>Fri, 05 Sep 2008 02:47:44 +0000</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Jennifer Lance</dc:creator>
    
		<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Other Green Topics]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>

    <guid isPermaLink="false">http://ecoscraps.com/2008/09/04/big-oils-land-leases-why-do-we-need-offshore-drilling-and-anwr/</guid>
    <description><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://ecoscraps.com/files/2008/09/threemaps2008-08-19.jpg"><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-791" src="http://go635254.s3.amazonaws.com/ecoscraps/files/2008/09/threemaps2008-08-19.jpg" alt="Big Oil land leases" width="498" height="444" /></a><a href="http://redgreenandblue.org/2008/08/20/campaign-contributions-versus-lobbying-big-oil-spends-big-money-in-washington/" target="_blank">Big Oil</a> and <a href="http://redgreenandblue.org/2008/09/04/drill-baby-drill-republicans-try-out-stupid-new-catchphrase/" target="_blank">some politicians</a> are constantly clamoring to open up more regions for oil exploration, but why?  Look at all the land they are already leasing or have been offered for leasing!</p>
<p>Image and Via: <a href="http://www.sierraclub.org/bigoil/map.asp" target="_blank">Sierra Club</a></p>
]]></description>
    <wfw:commentRss>http://ecoscraps.com/2008/09/04/big-oils-land-leases-why-do-we-need-offshore-drilling-and-anwr/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>Palin Disparages Environmentalist &#8216;Fear Mongering&#8217; Yet Warns of a &#8216;World of Hurt&#8217; if We Don&#8217;t Drill</title>
    <link>http://redgreenandblue.org/2008/09/02/palin-disparages-environmentalist-fear-mongering-yet-warns-of-a-world-of-hurt-if-we-dont-drill/</link>
    <comments>http://redgreenandblue.org/2008/09/02/palin-disparages-environmentalist-fear-mongering-yet-warns-of-a-world-of-hurt-if-we-dont-drill/#comments</comments>
    <pubDate>Tue, 02 Sep 2008 17:29:34 +0000</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Timothy B. Hurst</dc:creator>
    
		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Choice]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Energy]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Liberal]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[US Election]]></category>

    <guid isPermaLink="false">http://redgreenandblue.org/2008/09/02/palin-disparages-environmentalist-fear-mongering-yet-warns-of-a-world-of-hurt-if-we-dont-drill/</guid>
    <description><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://redgreenandblue.org/files/2008/08/picture-112.png"><img class="alignleft size-full wp-image-862" style="margin-left: 4px;margin-right: 4px;float: left" src="http://go635254.s3.amazonaws.com/redgreenandblue/files/2008/08/picture-112.png" alt="" width="295" height="204" /></a>On Friday, presumptive GOP vice-presidential nominee Sarah Palin did an <a href="http://www.cnbc.com/id/26462569/site/14081545/">interview on CNBC</a> that focused largely on American <span style="text-decoration: line-through">energy</span> oil policy. Most of the discussion was about drilling in ANWR and when Bartiromo asked about the specific steps Palin would take to mitigate environmental impacts, she answered by talking about how the naysayers and fear mongers didn&#8217;t get it, and that drilling was critical to Alaska&#8217;s economy, essentially dodging the crux of the question, and alienating herself from the other 49 states.</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t want you to get the idea that Bartiromo was tough, because she wasn&#8217;t. In fact, <a href="http://www.dailykos.com/story/2008/8/31/123344/981/532/581194">Bartiromo repeated Palin&#8217;s assertion</a> that ANWR&#8217;s footprint would only be 2,000 acres on this past Sunday&#8217;s <em>Meet the Press</em> four times - a claim that has been <a href="http://www.nrdc.org/land/wilderness/artech/farc2000.asp">called out as a myth</a> - as if she was a surrogate for the governor. But what struck me most was not Palin&#8217;s support for increased oil development in Alaska, but that she <strong>simultaneously criticized fear mongering tactics and employed them herself</strong>.
<p><a href="http://redgreenandblue.org/2008/09/02/palin-disparages-environmentalist-fear-mongering-yet-warns-of-a-world-of-hurt-if-we-dont-drill/" class="more-link">Read more of this story &#187;</a></p>
]]></description>
    <wfw:commentRss>http://redgreenandblue.org/2008/09/02/palin-disparages-environmentalist-fear-mongering-yet-warns-of-a-world-of-hurt-if-we-dont-drill/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>Reconfiguring Labor Day: The Convergence of the Labor and Environmental Movements</title>
    <link>http://redgreenandblue.org/2008/09/01/reconfiguring-labor-day-the-convergence-of-the-labor-and-environmental-movements/</link>
    <comments>http://redgreenandblue.org/2008/09/01/reconfiguring-labor-day-the-convergence-of-the-labor-and-environmental-movements/#comments</comments>
    <pubDate>Mon, 01 Sep 2008 21:31:03 +0000</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Timothy B. Hurst</dc:creator>
    
		<category><![CDATA[Climate Change]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Choice]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Energy]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Liberal]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Other Politics]]></category>

    <guid isPermaLink="false">http://redgreenandblue.org/2008/09/01/reconfiguring-labor-day-the-convergence-of-the-labor-and-environmental-movements/</guid>
    <description><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://redgreenandblue.org/files/2008/09/rgb-construction-workers.jpg"><img class="alignleft size-medium wp-image-872" style="float: left;margin-left: 3px;margin-right: 3px" src="http://go635254.s3.amazonaws.com/redgreenandblue/files/2008/09/rgb-construction-workers-300x225.jpg" alt="" width="300" height="225" /></a>The character of the Labor Day celebration has undergone a palpable shift in recent years, especially in large industrial centers where mass displays and huge parades have given way to scaled-down parades, and neighborhood cookouts. But long before Labor Day symbolized the end of summer, and the closing of the municipal pool, it was a celebration of this country&#8217;s backbone - its laborers.</p>
<p>The first governmental recognition of Labor Day came through municipal ordinances passed during 1885 and 1886. In 1894 President Grover Cleveland declared Labor Day a national holiday. Throughout the 20th century, the interests of labor groups were firmly entrenched in the populist vision and the platform of the Democratic Party. But starting in the 1960s and 1970s, a chasm began to grow within the Democratic Party between the established interests of the labor movement and the emerging interests of the environmental movement.
<p><a href="http://redgreenandblue.org/2008/09/01/reconfiguring-labor-day-the-convergence-of-the-labor-and-environmental-movements/" class="more-link">Read more of this story &#187;</a></p>
]]></description>
    <wfw:commentRss>http://redgreenandblue.org/2008/09/01/reconfiguring-labor-day-the-convergence-of-the-labor-and-environmental-movements/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>Drilling in the Amazon</title>
    <link>http://redgreenandblue.org/2008/08/19/drilling-in-the-amazon/</link>
    <comments>http://redgreenandblue.org/2008/08/19/drilling-in-the-amazon/#comments</comments>
    <pubDate>Tue, 19 Aug 2008 15:34:57 +0000</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Amiel Blajchman</dc:creator>
    
		<category><![CDATA[Energy]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Liberal]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[World]]></category>

    <guid isPermaLink="false">http://redgreenandblue.org/2008/08/19/drilling-in-the-amazon/</guid>
    <description><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://redgreenandblue.org/files/2008/08/amazon.jpg"><img class="alignleft size-medium wp-image-727" src="http://go635254.s3.amazonaws.com/redgreenandblue/files/2008/08/amazon-300x225.jpg" alt="Amazon Car" width="300" height="225" /></a>According to a recent report from <a href="http://www.saveamericasforests.org/WesternAmazon/index.html" target="_blank">Save America&#8217;s Forests</a>, some of the most ecologically sensitive parts of the Amazon are also home to large blocks of oil and gas reserves. Similar to the situation in the Arctic National Wildlife Reserve (ANWR), global (and American) demand for oil and gas is resulting in natural resource exploration in areas that until recently, have been untouched. And, while the debate over offshore drilling and oil extraction in the ANWR seems to dominate the headlines and the political sphere, a similar discussion is not happening in this case.</p>
<p><a href="http://redgreenandblue.org/2008/08/19/drilling-in-the-amazon/" class="more-link">Read more of this story &#187;</a></p>
]]></description>
    <wfw:commentRss>http://redgreenandblue.org/2008/08/19/drilling-in-the-amazon/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>The Environmental Impotence of the Religious Right</title>
    <link>http://redgreenandblue.org/2008/08/13/the-environmental-impotence-of-the-religious-right/</link>
    <comments>http://redgreenandblue.org/2008/08/13/the-environmental-impotence-of-the-religious-right/#comments</comments>
    <pubDate>Wed, 13 Aug 2008 23:19:55 +0000</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Jerry James Stone</dc:creator>
    
		<category><![CDATA[Climate Change]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Leader]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Liberal]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Other Politics]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Policy]]></category>

    <guid isPermaLink="false">http://redgreenandblue.org/2008/08/13/the-environmental-impotence-of-the-religious-right/</guid>
    <description><![CDATA[<p><img class="alignleft" style="float: left;margin-left: 20px;margin-right: 20px" src="http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2175/2274153092_0c5dfbea55.jpg" alt="" width="290" height="380" />And once again I find myself both amused and completely horror-struck by the evangelical cult that resides within the GOP. They&#8217;re consistently bested by their faith, and to the point of absurdity. This is especially true with regards to the climate crisis. And quite frankly, I blame Jesus.</p>
<p>Congresswoman Michele Bachmann&#8217;s comments about House Speaker Pelosi brought the issue to the front of the line. In her current bout of political tourettes, she had this to say:</p>
<p>&#8220;[Pelosi] is committed to her global warming fanaticism to the point where she has said that she&#8217;s just trying to save the planet,&#8221; Bachmann <a href="http://www.onenewsnow.com/Politics/Default.aspx?id=210502">told news site OneNewsNow</a>. &#8220;We all know that someone did that over 2,000 years ago, they saved the planet &#8212; we didn&#8217;t need Nancy Pelosi to do that.&#8221;</p>
<p>Yes, folks&#8230;stop recycling, throwout your reusable bags and just let your cars run all day long. For Jesus, yes the one and only Jesus, has already fixed that whole global warming thingamabob.</p>
<p>Mind you, this lady is notorious for her <a href="http://ecoscraps.com/2008/03/27/compact-fluorescent-backlash-strikes/">hair-brained explanations</a>. For example, did you know that the <a href="http://redgreenandblue.org/2008/05/09/anwr-drilling-promotedcan-you-make-a-difference/">Arctic National Wildlife Refuge</a> is now <a href="http://tpmelectioncentral.talkingpointsmemo.com/2008/07/another_gop_oil_myth_no_wildli.php">100% wildlife free</a>? Yep, same great taste but less filling. And this is why the <a href="http://www.onenewsnow.com/Politics/Default.aspx?id=205272">Democrats favor high gas prices</a>:</p>
<p>&#8220;They want Americans to take transit and move to the inner cities. They want Americans to move to the urban core, live in tenements, [and] take light rail to their government jobs. That&#8217;s their vision for America.&#8221;</p>
<p>Yes, Al Gore, dressed a la <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dr._Evil">Dr. Evil</a>, is trying to <a href="http://redgreenandblue.org/2008/08/08/why-high-gas-prices-can-be-good-for-the-environment/">scare us all in to using light rail</a>. Oh the horror of it all! It&#8217;s just too convenient. I mean all of it, if the planet is all saved thanks to Super Jesus then why do I keep getting copies of <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Watchtower">the Watchtower</a>? Just let the guy do his job, already - no one likes to be micromanaged.</p>
<p>But that&#8217;s the rub. We&#8217;re not saved. He did not save us. None of it is okay. We must stop denying it like that <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=07WX3F7UQWA">mom in the jaw-dropping Jesus Camp</a> movie?  We cannot lend ourselves to distractions like <a href="http://www.startribune.com/politics/national/house/17002506.html">the plight of the incandescent bulb</a>. There is no time. Accountability is our only salvation, not Jesus.</p>
<p>So I pray. I pray for Congresswoman Bachmann. I also pray for that crazy mom in the movie. I pray that for whatever bulb they choose, they themselves won&#8217;t remain perpetually dim.</p>
<h3>Related Posts:</h3>
<p><strong><a href="http://sustainablog.org/2008/02/21/saving-more-than-souls-religious-groups-seek-renewal-for-the-environment/">Saving More Than Souls: Religious Groups Seek “Renewal” for the Environment </a><br />
<a href="http://redgreenandblue.org/2008/04/24/youre-either-with-us-or-youre-with-the-cfls/">You’re Either with Us, or You’re with the CFLs : Red, Green, and Blue</a><br />
<a href="http://sustainablog.org/2008/03/28/jesus-unplugged-religious-groups-participate-in-earth-hour-2008/">Jesus Unplugged: Religious Groups Participate in Earth Hour 2008</a></strong></p>
<p>Image source: <a href="http://rds.yahoo.com/_ylt=A0S020oxTaNI2vYA9bejzbkF/SIG=11og06lce/EXP=1218748081/**http%3A//www.flickr.com/photos/asemta/" target="_top">Asemta</a> at <a href="http://www.flickr.com/" target="_top">Flickr</a></p>
]]></description>
    <wfw:commentRss>http://redgreenandblue.org/2008/08/13/the-environmental-impotence-of-the-religious-right/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>Paris Hilton and US Energy Policy</title>
    <link>http://redgreenandblue.org/2008/08/07/paris-hilton-and-us-energy-policy/</link>
    <comments>http://redgreenandblue.org/2008/08/07/paris-hilton-and-us-energy-policy/#comments</comments>
    <pubDate>Thu, 07 Aug 2008 17:06:30 +0000</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Amiel Blajchman</dc:creator>
    
		<category><![CDATA[Center]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Energy]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Other Politics]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Policy]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[US Election]]></category>

    <guid isPermaLink="false">http://redgreenandblue.org/2008/08/07/paris-hilton-and-us-energy-policy/</guid>
    <description><![CDATA[<p>Now I&#8217;m scared. Paris Hilton has jumped into the Presidential race fray thanks to John McCain&#8217;s perhaps ill-advised decision to compare Barrack Obama to Britney Spears and Paris Hilton. (See fellow blogger Clayton&#8217;s <a href="http://redgreenandblue.org/2008/08/06/paris-hilton-responds-to-john-mccain-ad-its-hot/" target="_blank">summary</a>.) In return, Ms. Hilton came out with a professional-looking, tongue-in-cheek <a href="http://www.funnyordie.com/videos/64ad536a6d" target="_blank">riposte </a>that can only be described as&#8230; both an illuminating <a href="http://redgreenandblue.org/files/2008/08/239168376_278eafccd1.jpg"><img class="size-medium wp-image-653" src="http://redgreenandblue.org/files/2008/08/239168376_278eafccd1-300x225.jpg" alt="//www.flickr.com/people/casasroger/&#62; via *flickr* under a Creative Commons License" width="300" height="225" /></a>look into American celebrity culture and traditional politics, as well as what we should all understand as a snapshot into how speechwriting can make or break you.</p>
<p><a href="http://redgreenandblue.org/2008/08/07/paris-hilton-and-us-energy-policy/" class="more-link">Read more of this story &#187;</a></p>
]]></description>
    <wfw:commentRss>http://redgreenandblue.org/2008/08/07/paris-hilton-and-us-energy-policy/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>Offshore Drilling Ban Opens Discussion for Other Domestic Oil Options</title>
    <link>http://redgreenandblue.org/2008/06/20/offshore-drilling-ban-opens-discussion-for-other-domestic-oil-options/</link>
    <comments>http://redgreenandblue.org/2008/06/20/offshore-drilling-ban-opens-discussion-for-other-domestic-oil-options/#comments</comments>
    <pubDate>Fri, 20 Jun 2008 21:54:51 +0000</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Heidi Suydam</dc:creator>
    
		<category><![CDATA[Center]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Energy]]></category>

    <guid isPermaLink="false">http://redgreenandblue.org/2008/06/20/offshore-drilling-ban-opens-discussion-for-other-domestic-oil-options/</guid>
    <description><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://redgreenandblue.org/files/2008/06/oil-rig-and-ship.jpg"><img class="alignnone size-full wp-image-361" src="http://go635254.s3.amazonaws.com/redgreenandblue/files/2008/06/oil-rig-and-ship.jpg" alt="" width="500" height="289" /></a></p>
<p>This was a big week for our <a href="http://www.votesmart.org/election_president.php">Presidential candidates</a> and <a href="http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2008/06/17/politics/politico/thecrypt/main4188652.shtml">energy policy</a>, specifically domestic oil drilling. With the recent decision by a <a href="http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,365627,00.html">House Sub-committee</a> to continue the ban on more offshore drilling, spirited discussion regarding domestic oil has sprung up everywhere. This week <a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2008/06/16/AR2008061602731_pf.html">John McCain</a> extended his support for offshore drilling, stating that he thinks the ban should be lifted however he also made the statement that he opposes any drilling of ANWR. <a href="http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20080618/ap_on_go_pr_wh/offshore_oil">Barack Obama</a> opposes lifting the ban on offshore drilling and ANWR drilling.</p>
<p>As Americans, we have a lot to think about. The fact is we do have domestic oil that we are not extracting. Geologists report we have billions of barrels in both the <a href="http://www.usgs.gov/newsroom/article.asp?ID=1911&#38;from=rss_home">Bakkan Shale</a> and <a href="http://pubs.usgs.gov/fs/fs-0028-01/fs-0028-01.htm">ANWR</a>. Why is John McCain in favor of lifting the offshore drilling ban while at the same time opposed to ANWR drilling? Is it politically convenient? Is it a possible attempt to satisfy both sides of a debate? Why is Barack Obama opposed to all new domestic drilling? Despite the fact that <a href="http://www.scienceclarified.com/Mu-Oi/Oil-Drilling.html">offshore drilling</a> is technologically at its best, we have other options in other areas.
<p><a href="http://redgreenandblue.org/2008/06/20/offshore-drilling-ban-opens-discussion-for-other-domestic-oil-options/" class="more-link">Read more of this story &#187;</a></p>
]]></description>
    <wfw:commentRss>http://redgreenandblue.org/2008/06/20/offshore-drilling-ban-opens-discussion-for-other-domestic-oil-options/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>Bush Blames Congress for High Electricity, Food, And Gas Prices</title>
    <link>http://gas2.org/2008/04/29/bush-blames-congress-for-high-electricity-food-and-gas-prices/</link>
    <comments>http://gas2.org/2008/04/29/bush-blames-congress-for-high-electricity-food-and-gas-prices/#comments</comments>
    <pubDate>Tue, 29 Apr 2008 18:29:52 +0000</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Clayton B. Cornell</dc:creator>
    
		<category><![CDATA[Oil]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>

    <guid isPermaLink="false">http://gas2.org/2008/04/29/bush-blames-congress-for-high-electricity-food-and-gas-prices/</guid>
    <description><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://go635254.s3.amazonaws.com/gas2/files/2008/04/anwr-eia.jpg" alt="ANWR, EIA, Graph, oil production" align="top" /></p>
<p><strong>This morning on NPR, President Bush tried to blame congress for the nation&#8217;s <a href="http://gas2.org/2008/03/10/us-will-export-440-billion-for-oil-in-2008/" title="US will export $440 Billion">high gas</a>, <a href="http://gas2.org/2008/04/14/perfect-storm-inflating-food-prices-worldwide/" title="Why food prices are so high...">food</a>, and electricity prices. Apparently, Congress has been thwarting the President&#8217;s attempts to fix the economy:</strong></p>
<p>&#8220;I&#8217;ve repeatedly submitted proposals to help address these problems,&#8221; the president said. &#8220;Yet time after time, Congress chose to block them.&#8221;
<p><a href="http://gas2.org/2008/04/29/bush-blames-congress-for-high-electricity-food-and-gas-prices/" class="more-link">Read more of this story &#187;</a></p>
]]></description>
    <wfw:commentRss>http://gas2.org/2008/04/29/bush-blames-congress-for-high-electricity-food-and-gas-prices/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>Alaska Under Attack Again</title>
    <link>http://planetsave.com/blog/2008/04/02/alaska-under-attack-again/</link>
    <comments>http://planetsave.com/blog/2008/04/02/alaska-under-attack-again/#comments</comments>
    <pubDate>Wed, 02 Apr 2008 17:26:42 +0000</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Joshua S Hill</dc:creator>
    
		<category><![CDATA[Action &amp; Activism]]></category>

    <guid isPermaLink="false">http://planetsave.com/blog/2008/04/02/alaska-under-attack-again/</guid>
    <description><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/46701216@N00/2383367288/" title="800px-A_mother_and_a_cub_bears"><img src="http://static.flickr.com/2362/2383367288_2648ae890d_m.jpg" alt="800px-A_mother_and_a_cub_bears" align="left" /></a>I haven’t always been the liberal nutjob that I am now. There was a time when I was right behind Bush for trundling in to Iraq, and found the idea of protecting animals very much the picture of “hippie” idiocy.</p>
<p>But, with age came wisdom, and with wisdom came a shift in my view of the world.</p>
<p>I say that, because in an MSNBC article entitled <a href="http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/23811748">‘Yukon Flats wildlife refuge eyed for its oil,’</a> this sentence appears; “A controversial land swap proposal could open portions of an Alaska wildlife refuge to oil drilling, dividing Alaska natives and stoking opposition from environmentalists seeking to protect the bears, moose and birds that live there.”</p>
<p>The moment I read “moose,” I knew that my perspective on the world had changed. A part of my mind, long since dormant, by instinct reared up and said “It’s a moose! Who cares?!” But it was immediately overridden by the new me which realized the overall importance of sustaining various ecosystems and species.</p>
<p>The plan is a land trade, which would give 110,000 acres of hydrocarbon-prone uplands within the Yukon Flats National Wildlife Refuge, plus mineral rights to another 97,000 acres, to Fairbanks-based Doyon Ltd. The Refuge lies just south of the ‘always-in-the-news’ Arctic National Wildlife Refuge.</p>
<p>In exchange, and definitely a plus to the deal, the Refuge would acquire 150,000 acres of bird-friendly wetlands, currently owned by Doyon, as well as 56,500 acres on which Doyon currently has pending land claims.</p>
<p><a href="http://planetsave.com/blog/2008/04/02/alaska-under-attack-again/" class="more-link">Read more of this story &#187;</a></p>
]]></description>
    <wfw:commentRss>http://planetsave.com/blog/2008/04/02/alaska-under-attack-again/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
  </item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- 563 queries in 1.113 seconds. -->