<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
  xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
  xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
  >

<channel>
  <title>Green Options &#187; April Fool's</title>
  <link>http://greenoptions.com/tag/april-fools</link>
  <description>Posts tagged 'April Fool's'</description>
  <pubDate>Tue, 01 Apr 2008 14:21:27 +0000</pubDate>
  <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
  <language>en</language>
  <item>
    <title>How Much Carbon Does Your Carbon Footprint Calculator Produce?</title>
    <link>http://ecoscraps.com/2008/04/01/how-much-carbon-does-your-carbon-footprint-calculator-produce/</link>
    <comments>http://ecoscraps.com/2008/04/01/how-much-carbon-does-your-carbon-footprint-calculator-produce/#comments</comments>
    <pubDate>Tue, 01 Apr 2008 14:21:27 +0000</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Philip Proefrock</dc:creator>
    
		<category><![CDATA[Fun / Offbeat]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[ecoscraps]]></category>

    <guid isPermaLink="false">http://ecoscraps.com/2008/04/01/how-much-carbon-does-your-carbon-footprint-calculator-produce/</guid>
    <description><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://go635254.s3.amazonaws.com/ecoscraps/files/2008/04/iceberg_near_sanderson_hope.jpg" alt="Iceberg" align="left" />Over at <a href="http://www.treehugger.com/">Treehugger</a> today, architecture writer Lloyd Alter has written an eye-opening piece about the shockingly high<a href="http://www.treehugger.com/files/2008/04/the-carbon-footprint-of-carbon-footprint-caclulators.php"> carbon footprint of online carbon footprint calculators</a>.</p>
<p>Not only do the calculators themselves have  an impact, but they are just the tip of the metaphorical iceberg.</p>
<p>Beyond that, the thousands and thousands of pages that link to them also contribute to the total impact these carbon calculators are responsible for.</p>
<p>Link to  <a href="http://www.treehugger.com/files/2008/04/the-carbon-footprint-of-carbon-footprint-caclulators.php">full article</a>.</p>
<p><em>Image source: <a href="http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Image:Iceberg_near_sanderson_hope_2007-07-24_1.jpg">Kim Hansen/Wikimedia </a></em></p>
]]></description>
    <wfw:commentRss>http://ecoscraps.com/2008/04/01/how-much-carbon-does-your-carbon-footprint-calculator-produce/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>New Levels of LEED</title>
    <link>http://greenbuildingelements.com/2008/04/01/new-levels-of-leed/</link>
    <comments>http://greenbuildingelements.com/2008/04/01/new-levels-of-leed/#comments</comments>
    <pubDate>Tue, 01 Apr 2008 13:58:00 +0000</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Philip Proefrock</dc:creator>
    
		<category><![CDATA[Programs and Standards]]></category>

    <guid isPermaLink="false">http://greenbuildingelements.com/2008/04/01/new-levels-of-leed/</guid>
    <description><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://go635254.s3.amazonaws.com/greenbuildingelements/files/2008/04/bengal-kittens-print-c10084151.jpeg" alt="Modular kitten insulation" align="top" /></p>
<p>A new top-level LEED classification called Unobtanium is being proposed to replace the currently proposed Protactinium level, leading to a possible schism in the growing green building rating system.  Whether Protactinium or Unobtanium becomes the new top-level of the LEED rating system&#8230;?</p>
<p>Earlier this year, officials proposed a new level of LEED (Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design) that is higher than the current top-end Platinum rating.  The new Protactinium level introduces more stringent requirements to ensure the purity of the design team and to verify their worthiness to obtain such a noble rating for their building.
<p><a href="http://greenbuildingelements.com/2008/04/01/new-levels-of-leed/" class="more-link">Read more of this story &#187;</a></p>
]]></description>
    <wfw:commentRss>http://greenbuildingelements.com/2008/04/01/new-levels-of-leed/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>Scientists Clone New Food Industry</title>
    <link>http://eatdrinkbetter.com/2008/04/01/scientists-clone-new-food-industry/</link>
    <comments>http://eatdrinkbetter.com/2008/04/01/scientists-clone-new-food-industry/#comments</comments>
    <pubDate>Tue, 01 Apr 2008 04:35:25 +0000</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Beth Bader</dc:creator>
    
		<category><![CDATA[agriculture]]></category>

    <guid isPermaLink="false">http://eatdrinkbetter.com/2008/04/01/scientists-clone-new-food-industry/</guid>
    <description><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://eatdrinkbetter.com/files/2008/04/pigs.jpg" title="pigs.jpg"><img src="http://go635254.s3.amazonaws.com/eatdrinkbetter/files/2008/04/pigs.jpg" alt="pigs.jpg" /></a>© <a href="http://www.dreamstime.com/Vidok_info">Ivan Vasilev</a> &#124; <a href="http://www.dreamstime.com/">Dreamstime.com</a></p>
<p>In an unusual twist, biotech scientists have decided that focusing on creating hybrids of new animals and plants is just thinking too small. &#8220;We realized that if we were to try and fix all the ills in the current Big Agriculture system, we&#8217;d be cloning for the next millennium&#8221; said Irving Pinkel. &#8220;So, we figured maybe it would be easier to just start from scratch.&#8221;</p>
<p>According to Pinkel and his lead associates, the galvanizing moment came after an experiment with <a href="http://www.ethicurean.com/2008/03/24/digest-news-56/">cloning a round worm gene into pigs</a> that would make the resulting pork &#8220;heart-healthy&#8221; and containing more Omega-3 acids. Three of the piglets had to be euthanized due to heart defects.</p>
<p>&#8220;Well, the irony of the situation set in,&#8221; said Pinkel. &#8220;We were all out and maybe had a few too many beers. One of the guys said, &#8216;You know, I bet if we just fed them [pigs] a natural diet, that would fix the whole meat thing without cloning. Could you do that?&#8217;&#8221;
<p><a href="http://eatdrinkbetter.com/2008/04/01/scientists-clone-new-food-industry/" class="more-link">Read more of this story &#187;</a></p>
]]></description>
    <wfw:commentRss>http://eatdrinkbetter.com/2008/04/01/scientists-clone-new-food-industry/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
  </item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- 162 queries in 0.430 seconds. -->