<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
  xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
  xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
  >

<channel>
  <title>Green Options &#187; Bill</title>
  <link>http://greenoptions.com/tag/bill</link>
  <description>Posts tagged 'Bill'</description>
  <pubDate>Mon, 19 Oct 2009 16:45:58 +0000</pubDate>
  <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
  <language>en</language>
  <item>
    <title>Three-Wheelers Approved for DOE Funds</title>
    <link>http://gas2.org/2009/10/19/3-wheelers-approved-for-doe-funds/</link>
    <comments>http://gas2.org/2009/10/19/3-wheelers-approved-for-doe-funds/#comments</comments>
    <pubDate>Mon, 19 Oct 2009 16:45:58 +0000</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Jo Borras</dc:creator>
    
		<category><![CDATA[Auto industry]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Electric Cars (EVs)]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Policy]]></category>

    <guid isPermaLink="false">http://gas2.org/2009/10/19/3-wheelers-approved-for-doe-funds/</guid>
    <description><![CDATA[<p style="text-align: center"><img class="size-medium wp-image-3835 aligncenter" src="http://go635254.s3.amazonaws.com/gas2/files/2009/10/aptera_1-600x280.jpg" alt="Aptera 2e" width="500" height="230" /></p>

<p>Many manufacturers of high-mpg and electric vehicles have adopted a 3-wheeled layout for cost and weight savings, and—in some cases—<a href="http://gas2.org/2008/09/15/do-cars-really-need-to-look-like-ufos-to-save-gas/" target="_blank">aerodynamic efficiency</a>. In most states, however, these vehicles are classified as motorcycles. That motorcycle moniker has made them ineligible for DOE funds set aside to foster innovation among American automakers&#8230; until now!</p>
<p>More details, after the jump.</p>
<p><a href="http://gas2.org/2009/10/19/3-wheelers-approved-for-doe-funds/" class="more-link">Read more of this story &#187;</a></p>
]]></description>
    <wfw:commentRss>http://gas2.org/2009/10/19/3-wheelers-approved-for-doe-funds/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>United States Finally Gets Behind Climate Legislation</title>
    <link>http://redgreenandblue.org/2009/08/13/united-states-finally-gets-behind-climate-legislation/</link>
    <comments>http://redgreenandblue.org/2009/08/13/united-states-finally-gets-behind-climate-legislation/#comments</comments>
    <pubDate>Thu, 13 Aug 2009 18:21:09 +0000</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Daniel Hohler</dc:creator>
    
		<category><![CDATA[Climate Change]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Leader]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Policy]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[U.S.]]></category>

    <guid isPermaLink="false">http://redgreenandblue.org/2009/08/13/united-states-finally-gets-behind-climate-legislation/</guid>
    <description><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://redgreenandblue.org/files/2009/08/us.jpg"><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-3502" src="http://go635254.s3.amazonaws.com/redgreenandblue/files/2009/08/us.jpg" alt="" width="500" height="375" /></a></p>

<p>In a recent Zogby telephone poll conducted to gauge public opinion on the the Waxman-Markey climate bill, the results showed that a majority of Americans are finally behind climate legislation. The Waxman-Markey climate bill sets out to limit greenhouse gases in the US in order to combat climate change. The bill was just narrowly passed in congress last June by a vote of 219-212.</p>
<p>In the recent past, Americans have shown no interest in changing policy to limit greenhouse gasses, yet shockingly the results of this latest poll show that a whopping 71% of Americans support this bill. The poll also showed that Americans of every age, income group, and political affiliation support the bill much more than previously thought. An enormous win for those of us who want to see reduction in greenhouse gasses.</p>
<p><a href="http://redgreenandblue.org/2009/08/13/united-states-finally-gets-behind-climate-legislation/" class="more-link">Read more of this story &#187;</a></p>
]]></description>
    <wfw:commentRss>http://redgreenandblue.org/2009/08/13/united-states-finally-gets-behind-climate-legislation/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>So SUE Me! &#8212; Waxman-Markey might make it legal to sue over Global Warming</title>
    <link>http://redgreenandblue.org/2009/04/10/so-sue-me-waxman-markey-might-make-it-legal-to-sue-over-global-warming/</link>
    <comments>http://redgreenandblue.org/2009/04/10/so-sue-me-waxman-markey-might-make-it-legal-to-sue-over-global-warming/#comments</comments>
    <pubDate>Fri, 10 Apr 2009 19:11:21 +0000</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Alan Smith</dc:creator>
    
		<category><![CDATA[Climate Change]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Conservative]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[EC Leader]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Choice]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Energy]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Policy]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[U.S.]]></category>

    <guid isPermaLink="false">http://redgreenandblue.org/2009/04/10/so-sue-me-waxman-markey-might-make-it-legal-to-sue-over-global-warming/</guid>
    <description><![CDATA[<p><a href="../files/2009/04/lawsuit.jpg"><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-2927" src="../files/2009/04/lawsuit.jpg" alt="" width="500" height="334" /></a></p>
<p>The Waxman-Markey bill that recently was introduced into the House has already caused quit a stir, and that was before someone found a provision tucked in it&#8217;s 600 plus pages that would make it <strong>legal to sue the Government if you <em>suffer</em> from Global Warming.</strong></p>
<p>The bill is big, robust, and in many cases even more aggressive in it&#8217;s battle against C02 then the Obama plan (maybe for a reason: to make the Obama plan seem palatable in comparison?).  This one little subsection, however, has the <a href="http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2009/apr/10/climate-bill-could-trigger-lawsuit-landslide/">Washingtin Times all up in arms</a>.  They are worried about the huge number of new lawsuits that this could cause tying up the legal system.  Wait a second&#8230; does that mean that they are admitting that these hypothetical lawsuits would be justified?  That the realize there would be a reason to be upset at the Feds for their inaction on Global Warming?   Nah&#8230;</p>
<h3>Legal Options for Those &#8220;Harmed&#8221; by Global Warming.</h3>
<p>According to the Times, the bill opens up a direct legal action option for individuals who feel they have been harmed in some way by Global Warming.  I located the passage they are talking about <a href="http://markey.house.gov/index.php?option=content&#38;task=view&#38;id=3583&#38;Itemid=125">in the bill</a>, and the Times seems to have it about right: here&#8217;s a line or two from the SEC. 336. ENFORCEMENT bit of the bill.</p>
<blockquote><p>The persons authorized by subsection (a) to commence an action under this section shall include any person who has suffered, or reasonably expects to suffer, a harm attributable, in whole or in part, to a violation or failure to act referred to in subsection (a).</p></blockquote>
<p>What is harm, you ask?  Well as near as I can tease out, it&#8217;s a wide open definition: &#8220;any effect of air pollution (including climate change), currently occurring or at risk of occurring.&#8221;  Well, I&#8217;m an asthmatic, and it&#8217;s been getting worse my whole life.  Does this mean I now have someone to blame!?
<p><a href="http://redgreenandblue.org/2009/04/10/so-sue-me-waxman-markey-might-make-it-legal-to-sue-over-global-warming/" class="more-link">Read more of this story &#187;</a></p>
]]></description>
    <wfw:commentRss>http://redgreenandblue.org/2009/04/10/so-sue-me-waxman-markey-might-make-it-legal-to-sue-over-global-warming/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>Boston Teen Files Bill to Ban &#8216;Debarking&#8217; of Cats and Dogs</title>
    <link>http://planetsave.com/blog/2009/02/04/boston-teen-files-bill-to-ban-debarking-of-cats-and-dogs/</link>
    <comments>http://planetsave.com/blog/2009/02/04/boston-teen-files-bill-to-ban-debarking-of-cats-and-dogs/#comments</comments>
    <pubDate>Wed, 04 Feb 2009 11:15:36 +0000</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Andrew Williams</dc:creator>
    
		<category><![CDATA[Action &amp; Activism]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Nature &amp; Conservation]]></category>

    <guid isPermaLink="false">http://planetsave.com/blog/2009/02/04/boston-teen-files-bill-to-ban-debarking-of-cats-and-dogs/</guid>
    <description><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://planetsave.com/files/2009/02/devocalization-teen-boston.jpg"><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-3933" src="http://go635254.s3.amazonaws.com/planetsave/files/2009/02/devocalization-teen-boston.jpg" alt="" width="500" height="371" /></a></p>

<p><strong>Fifteen-year-old Bostonian Jordan Star has emerged as the <a title="devocalization" href="http://www.bostonherald.com/news/regional/view.bg?articleid=1149346" target="_blank">surprise driving force behind a bill to ban the cruel practice of &#8217;surgically silencing&#8217; cats and dogs by removing their vocal cords</a>.</strong></p>
<p>Star, a freshman at Needham High, decided to take action after coming across a dog that had been debarked and abandoned. “It was just horrible,” he said of the dog’s struggle to get his attention. “It was just like a hoarse, wheezy cough. In a shelter, all they are is a mutilated animal, which makes them harder to adopt.”</p>
<p><a href="http://planetsave.com/blog/2009/02/04/boston-teen-files-bill-to-ban-debarking-of-cats-and-dogs/" class="more-link">Read more of this story &#187;</a></p>
]]></description>
    <wfw:commentRss>http://planetsave.com/blog/2009/02/04/boston-teen-files-bill-to-ban-debarking-of-cats-and-dogs/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
  </item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- 189 queries in 0.468 seconds. -->