This is a followup post that will attempt to address some additional, wide-spread myths about the commercial sale of seed.  In this case the topic with be “GMO” seed improved through genetic engineering (an industry that is now 13 years old and which has been planted on well over 2 billion acres cumulatively, much of it in the developing world). As someone with substantial direct experience with this industry over the years, I’d like to try to speak to some distorted perspectives on this technology.

The First Biotech Crops

The four earliest commercial biotech crops commercialized in 1995/1996 were squash (virus resistant), corn (insect resistant), potatoes (insect resistant), and soybeans (herbicide tolerant). For the squash, corn and potatoes, commercialization was straight forward because it was already standard practice for farmers to buy new seed (tuber seed pieces in the case of potatoes) each year.

For soybeans there was a major commercialization challenge.  There was no question that the new technology was valuable — it would displace millions of pounds and hundreds of millions of dollars of herbicide sales.  It would also greatly increase the efficiency and convenience of producing soybeans. The challenge was that it was standard practice at the time for farmers to save-back some of their crop to use as seed the next year - more in some geographies than others.  If this practice were to continue with the new herbicide tolerant soybeans, it would have been very difficult for the company to recover its high risk investment in the new technology. Growers would simply buy seeds the first year, and then be set until they wanted to buy a new variety. This is not so different from the challenge that record labels with illegal file sharing via the internet.

The two standard solutions that most expected were either (a) charge enough upfront to make up for pervasive seed savings, or (b) raise the price of the herbicide to recover the genetic investment in that way. The first would have discouraged adoption; the second would have disrupted other crops and uses that also depended on the product. Instead, Monsanto tried something completely new (at least to the seed industry). They decided to charge a “technology fee” (”Tech Fee”) of a few $/bag and ask the farmers to sign a license agreement saying they would not save seed.  This was a pretty radical step at the time.  Monsanto also licensed the technology to many other seed companies and they too had to get growers to sign the licenses.

Read more of this story »

My previous post retraced the precipitous decline in the reputation of biofuels that occurred between 2006 and today.  In this post I’m going to talk about just a few of the activities going on for “second generation” biofuels (beyond corn, soy and palm oil, wheat…).  One of the key features of these initiatives is that they reduce the competition with food crops - something which will only become a more significant issue in the future.  I’ll be talking about several Universities and companies who have hung in there through the ups and downs of oil prices and the “trendiness” and “rejection” of biofuels.  I think that these folks are going to make significant long-term contributions. If you have been soured in the past on the biofuel concept, please consider these alternatives.

Algae

There was a recent Wall Street Journal article about “5 Technologies that could change everything.”  One they included was biofuels from Algae.  People have been working on this for a long time including a very long government effort.  The great thing about algae is that you can grow it in places and with water sources that are completely unsuitable for farming.  Algae can be extremely productive.  The problem is that the low capital investment systems are less productive and the highly productive, “bio-reactor” approach has a huge capital cost.  The good news is that there are enough companies working away on this that sooner or later there might be a break-through.  I won’t pretend to be an expert on how this is going, but I have a hunch it will eventually become significant.

Read more of this story »

]]> http://sustainablog.org/2009/11/05/rehabilitating-bio-fuels-part-2-interesting-second-generation-options/feed/ http://sustainablog.org/2009/10/31/are-large-for-profit-corporations-intrinsically-less-ethical/ http://sustainablog.org/2009/10/31/are-large-for-profit-corporations-intrinsically-less-ethical/#comments Sat, 31 Oct 2009 20:43:35 +0000 Steve Savage http://sustainablog.org/2009/10/31/are-large-for-profit-corporations-intrinsically-less-ethical/
In the comment streams on my blog posts there is a recurrent theme from one segment of the respondents - they have a deep distrust in the large companies that are involved in modern agricultural technology.  They don’t believe these companies will behave ethically because they are for profit entities “only answerable to their shareholders.”   

I’d like to speak directly to this as a long-time Ag industry insider whose experience does not support these suspicions. I know that some will dismiss this perspective assuming I am biased, but one has to balance potential for bias with actually having first-hand experience from which to speak.  Over the last 32 years I’ve work for or with most of the companies, large and small, that provide agricultural technologies.  Fourteen of those years have been as an independent consultant so I get to know what is going on inside of many companies in a given year.  I have still only had direct knowledge of a subset of what happens, but in all of that exposure I’ve never witnessed an unethical decision or action - not even the consideration of one.  I’ve seen certain decisions that were short-sighted.  I’ve sometimes seen decision-making processes that are more driven by fear than by opportunity.  I’ve seen missed opportunities because vision was lacking.  I’ve occasionally seen failures to take advantage of synergies that could have been realized between divisions of large organizations. I’ve seen problems, but I believe that some level of dysfunction is inevitable in any organization involving people.  Still, unethical behavior isn’t something I’ve seen so I disagree that it is automatically likely just because of the characteristics of the company.  

On balance I’ve also seen these organizations, large and small, frequently make important contributions to society in terms of the productivity and safety of our food supply.  I’ve seen these companies continue to do that in an environment of constant activist attack and very limited public understanding because so few people farm.

Read more of this story »

]]> http://sustainablog.org/2009/10/31/are-large-for-profit-corporations-intrinsically-less-ethical/feed/ http://sustainablog.org/2009/10/23/cbs-television-exploiting-fear-for-profit-and-entertainment/ http://sustainablog.org/2009/10/23/cbs-television-exploiting-fear-for-profit-and-entertainment/#comments Fri, 23 Oct 2009 17:09:38 +0000 Steve Savage http://sustainablog.org/2009/10/23/cbs-television-exploiting-fear-for-profit-and-entertainment/

Last Monday the popular show “CSI: Miami” ran a segment in which a young woman dies and it turns out to be because of a GMO corn developed by a rogue company called “Bixton Organic Foods.”  In the plot, the company willingly puts people at risk.  This fictional scenario bears no plausible tie to reality, but it fits well with the simplistic, good guys/bad guys image in the Myth that many people believe about farming.  To see how it feels to be the brunt of a distortion like this, I recommend you read a post from a real corn farmer.  

So why is it possible for CBS writers to generate fictional “drama” about the “danger of GMO” when in fact GMO technology has been used with complete safety for more than a decade on a gigantic scale?  (Having witnessed first-hand the thought and care that went into developing this technology over the past 30 years, I’m not surprised by that safety record).  There is an abundance of good information available about this technology including many confirmations of its safety by panel after panel of highly qualified, science and medical experts around the world.  I think the reason that the fear of GMO persists in certain extreme circles is the same reason that there are still “birthers” and people who are sure that health reform will lead to “death panels.”  Its not that there is much overlap between these demographics but rather that the same mechanism of “selective knowing” is involved.

Read more of this story »

]]> http://sustainablog.org/2009/10/23/cbs-television-exploiting-fear-for-profit-and-entertainment/feed/ http://cleantechnica.com/2009/10/02/clean-tech-1-in-worldwide-venture-capital-investments/ http://cleantechnica.com/2009/10/02/clean-tech-1-in-worldwide-venture-capital-investments/#comments Fri, 02 Oct 2009 10:29:37 +0000 Zachary Shahan http://cleantechnica.com/2009/10/02/clean-tech-1-in-worldwide-venture-capital-investments/

Clean tech has passed biotech and IT as the top venture capital (VC) investment category in the world. This is after investments in leading clean tech markets increased by 10% in the third quarter of this year.

Cleantech Group released findings on Wednesday showing that the cleantech sector “accumulated $1.59 billion across 134 companies” and this was 10% more than the $1.2 billion it had accumulated in the second quarter.

Read more of this story »

]]> http://cleantechnica.com/2009/10/02/clean-tech-1-in-worldwide-venture-capital-investments/feed/ http://sustainablog.org/2009/09/27/food-supply-worries-of-an-agricultural-scientist-part-3-climate-change/ http://sustainablog.org/2009/09/27/food-supply-worries-of-an-agricultural-scientist-part-3-climate-change/#comments Mon, 28 Sep 2009 05:11:27 +0000 Steve Savage http://sustainablog.org/2009/09/27/food-supply-worries-of-an-agricultural-scientist-part-3-climate-change/

I’ll come back to the Mycotoxin issue soon.  Instead, I’ll talk today about my serious worries about Climate Change.  

People involved in world agriculture have no patience with the supposed “debate” about climate change.  We are already seeing the effects, and the projections for the future are not encouraging.  The most troubling feature of this phenomenon (and one that occurs even if you don’t believe that it is human-driven) is that we are facing increasing variation in climatic events.  The yearly changes in average temperature or even annual rainfall may not be dramatic, but what we are anticipating is that there will be more extreme weather events.  Climate averages are not what matters for crop production - Variation is.  A few days of intense rain or heat at the wrong time can devastate a crop.  A few weeks of drought can do the same.  A single hail or frost event can make all the difference in what a farmer can harvest.  We have always had those risks for farming and only long term data will demonstrate whether there has been an increasing trend as is predicted.  For instance, It isn’t possible yet to say that the current, extended drought in Australia is caused by elevated greenhouse gasses, but some day we will know whether it was by looking back historically.  Of course that will be too late.  Our actions have to come now.  The other huge threat from climate change is that water supplies will be more limiting in many areas that are irrigated today.  Though that area is much smaller than rain-fed areas, it is very important to the food supply.

Some have predicted that “Global warming” and elevated CO2 will boost crop production in certain areas.  There might be some occasions where higher temperatures will enhance some yields in normally cold areas, but if the warmth comes with other extreme weather events, the benefits will be diminished.  It also turns out that plants can’t really take full advantage of high CO2 levels.  Basically,  there is no real “up-side” of climate change for farming.

Read more of this story »

]]> http://sustainablog.org/2009/09/27/food-supply-worries-of-an-agricultural-scientist-part-3-climate-change/feed/ http://sustainablog.org/2009/09/20/an-agricultural-scientists-food-supply-worries-part-2-vomitoxin/ http://sustainablog.org/2009/09/20/an-agricultural-scientists-food-supply-worries-part-2-vomitoxin/#comments Mon, 21 Sep 2009 04:51:36 +0000 Steve Savage http://sustainablog.org/2009/09/20/an-agricultural-scientists-food-supply-worries-part-2-vomitoxin/

I need to be very careful in what I say about this topic because it would be easy to scare people beyond what is rational.  I could also also easily make enemies in the Wheat industry which is about the last thing I’d like to do.  I’m going to try to hit the right balance, but it is risky.

Mycotoxins

Most people don’t know that Mycotoxins are a very real issue in our food supply.  These are nasty, natural chemicals that are produced by certain fungi that infect crops. This is not something new.  In Medieval times there was a wide-spread neurological disorder called “Ergotism.” It was caused by mycotoxins in the rye crop produced by a disease called “ergot.” The poor people who lived off of rye, rather than wheat, were disproportionately effected.

Mycotoxins are still an issue today.  2009 has been a particularly bad year for a toxin called “vomitoxin” in wheat, barley and pasta wheat.  Its not a secret, but unless you read the farm press or trade news, you would never know.  Sometime do a Google News search for “vomitoxin.”  If there is rain when these grains are flowering, they can become infected with a fungus called Fusarium graminierum. The disease starts by reducing the farmer’s yields, but it can also produce a toxin in the remaining grain called deoxynivalenol (more commonly called DON toxin).  The trade term, “vomitoxin,” comes from the physical response that animals have if they are fed too much of this contaminated grain (which is obviously not pretty).

Read more of this story »

]]> http://sustainablog.org/2009/09/20/an-agricultural-scientists-food-supply-worries-part-2-vomitoxin/feed/ http://cleantechnica.com/2009/09/19/biotechnology-can-cut-co2-emissions-help-build-green-economy/ http://cleantechnica.com/2009/09/19/biotechnology-can-cut-co2-emissions-help-build-green-economy/#comments Sat, 19 Sep 2009 20:14:15 +0000 Zachary Shahan http://cleantechnica.com/2009/09/19/biotechnology-can-cut-co2-emissions-help-build-green-economy/

A new report released by the World Wildlife Fund (WWF) says that biotechnology is one possible solution to our climate change and our economic problems.

It could have a dramatic effect on CO2 emissions, and it could also be part of the new green economy. How much can it help? The report says it can reduce global emissions by as much as some leading countries emit in a year.

What is biotechnology? How can it cool our climate and give a boost to our economy? Is it an appropriate and safe solution to these problems?

Read more of this story »

]]> http://cleantechnica.com/2009/09/19/biotechnology-can-cut-co2-emissions-help-build-green-economy/feed/ http://sustainablog.org/2009/09/17/what-does-an-agricultural-scientist-worry-about-in-the-food-supply-part-1/ http://sustainablog.org/2009/09/17/what-does-an-agricultural-scientist-worry-about-in-the-food-supply-part-1/#comments Fri, 18 Sep 2009 05:04:59 +0000 Steve Savage http://sustainablog.org/2009/09/17/what-does-an-agricultural-scientist-worry-about-in-the-food-supply-part-1/

Lots of people in America are worried about their food - usually not about having enough food, but mostly about things that might be in their food that could potentially hurt them or their children.  People also worry about the environmental impacts of food production.  At one level I’m glad that people are engaged in this way and I do believe that there are legitimate concerns.   I happen to think that some of the fear about food is misplaced.

I believe that much of this fear stems from a limited understanding of toxicology, molecular genetics, and also what farming is actually about today.  Very few Americans have any real contact with farming.  Frankly, some of this fear is also driven by the activities of businesses and organizations with a vested economic interest in alarming people.

I’ve been working as an agricultural scientist for 32 years.  I’ve had the opportunity to learn about lots of crops grown all over the world.  I’ve been involved with all sorts of different technologies.  I’ve seen huge changes in agriculture over time. So from all of this experience, do I worry about anything to do with food?  Yes, absolutely I do worry! But my list of worries is a little different from the norm

Read more of this story »

]]> http://sustainablog.org/2009/09/17/what-does-an-agricultural-scientist-worry-about-in-the-food-supply-part-1/feed/ http://sustainablog.org/2009/09/13/celebrating-the-life-of-a-scientist-that-fed-the-world/ http://sustainablog.org/2009/09/13/celebrating-the-life-of-a-scientist-that-fed-the-world/#comments Mon, 14 Sep 2009 04:25:15 +0000 Steve Savage http://sustainablog.org/2009/09/13/celebrating-the-life-of-a-scientist-that-fed-the-world/

Dr. Norman Borlaug passed away this weekend at 95.  He left behind an amazing legacy of contribution to humanity.  It is likely that he saved more human lives than any other person in history.  He did it by developing far more productive wheat than had ever been grown.  His “short stature” wheat had shorter, thicker stems so that it could hold bigger heads of grain that would otherwise “lodge” (collapse over on to the ground where it can’t be harvested).  It was also resistant to the devastating wheat disease called “Stem Rust.”  This wheat ended up feeding millions of people around the world, particularly in Pakistan and India in the 1960s.  Borlaug’s breakthrough was a key part of the “Green Revolution” and it did much to address the hunger and poverty issues of the time.  For this, and his life-time of additional work Bourlag recieved the Nobel Peace Prize, the Presidential Medal of Freedom and the Congressional Gold Metal .  Only Martin Luther King, Elie Wiesel, Nelson Mandela and Mother Teresa have received all of these commendations.  He was also awarded the National Medal of Science and a host of other awards from around the world.  There is an excellent article about the life and career of this remarkable man in the Des Moines Register.

Read more of this story »

]]> http://sustainablog.org/2009/09/13/celebrating-the-life-of-a-scientist-that-fed-the-world/feed/ http://sustainablog.org/2009/09/10/macdonald%e2%80%99s-%e2%80%9cpesticide-conundrum%e2%80%9d-and-the-solution-it-will-probably-not-pursue-part-2/ http://sustainablog.org/2009/09/10/macdonald%e2%80%99s-%e2%80%9cpesticide-conundrum%e2%80%9d-and-the-solution-it-will-probably-not-pursue-part-2/#comments Thu, 10 Sep 2009 17:33:54 +0000 Steve Savage http://sustainablog.org/2009/09/10/macdonald%e2%80%99s-%e2%80%9cpesticide-conundrum%e2%80%9d-and-the-solution-it-will-probably-not-pursue-part-2/

This is a follow-up to a previous blog about a pesticide reduction commitment that McDonalds has made and why that will be challenging in terms of their potato supplies and quality.

Roundup Ready® soybeans were commercialized in 1996 and quickly came to dominate plantings in the US, Argentina and Brazil. NewLeaf® insect resistant potatoes were also introduced that year. These potatoes were genetically engineered to produce the same Bt protein insecticide that was used as a spray-on product on potatoes and which was also approved for Organic use. The second generation of GMO potatoes was on its way around 1999, which also protected against the key potato leaf roll virus, which required spraying to control the aphids that spread the virus.  Potato growers I interviewed at that time were excited about these technologies. Without having to spray for these two primary pests, biological control was largely taking care of the rest of their insect pest issues. They were also glad because they didn’t have to spend the money on most of their normal insecticide sprays.

This seemingly happy scenario came to an abrupt halt in 2000. Anti-GMO activism was starting to build and the leadership of McDonald’s got an arrogantly insufficient response from the leadership of Monsanto when they asked what was going to be done about the situation. McDonald’s defaulted to the “brand protection” mode and with three phone calls to the major frozen French fry suppliers, killed GMO potatoes in the US and Canada (Frito Lay and other brands joined in the defacto ban). That was only possible because increasing GMO potatoes was so much slower than increasing seeded crops and so only 5% of the crop was biotech. McDonald’s and all other fast food restaurants could never afford to ban the GMO ingredients that were in their frying oil or high fructose corn sweeteners because biotech adoption was so rapid for soy and corn. So McDonald’s still sells many products from GMO crops, just not potatoes because that would be much higher profile. There is absolutely no health risk issue here, but there is at least some irony.

Read more of this story »

]]> http://sustainablog.org/2009/09/10/macdonald%e2%80%99s-%e2%80%9cpesticide-conundrum%e2%80%9d-and-the-solution-it-will-probably-not-pursue-part-2/feed/ http://sustainablog.org/2009/09/02/raising-an-ethical-issue-in-the-farming-technology-debate/ http://sustainablog.org/2009/09/02/raising-an-ethical-issue-in-the-farming-technology-debate/#comments Wed, 02 Sep 2009 17:42:49 +0000 Steve Savage http://sustainablog.org/2009/09/02/raising-an-ethical-issue-in-the-farming-technology-debate/

 

The Image above is corn growing in Zimbabwe.

There was a scholarly article published late last year by Dr. Robert Paarlberg entitled “The Ethics of Modern Agriculture.”  I would encourage anyone concerned about both the environment and about feeding people to read it.  It raises some important questions about the ethics of even well intentioned anti-technology activism.

Paarlberg is a professor at Wellesley and also an associate at the Weatherhead Center for International Affairs at Harvard.  He has no ties to agricultural interests or technology companies, but he has spent a lot of time thinking about the ethics of opposition to technologies that could help feed the poor people of the world.  His book “Starved for Science” is a detailed review of how the precautionary principle thinking of the rich countries (particularly in Europe) has largely kept agricultural technologies out of Africa including ones that would help feed poor people there.

Read more of this story »

]]> http://sustainablog.org/2009/09/02/raising-an-ethical-issue-in-the-farming-technology-debate/feed/ http://cleantechnica.com/2009/08/27/watermelon-juice-next-source-of-renewable-energy/ http://cleantechnica.com/2009/08/27/watermelon-juice-next-source-of-renewable-energy/#comments Thu, 27 Aug 2009 12:49:28 +0000 Zachary Shahan http://cleantechnica.com/2009/08/27/watermelon-juice-next-source-of-renewable-energy/
Hundreds of thousands of tons of watermelons are tossed every year because they aren’t good enough for market. A new study finds that the juice from these watermelons could easily be used to create the biofuel ethanol and other helpful products.

Read more of this story »

]]> http://cleantechnica.com/2009/08/27/watermelon-juice-next-source-of-renewable-energy/feed/ http://sustainablog.org/2009/08/25/why-wheat-is-an-orphan-crop-conclusion/ http://sustainablog.org/2009/08/25/why-wheat-is-an-orphan-crop-conclusion/#comments Tue, 25 Aug 2009 18:14:50 +0000 Steve Savage http://sustainablog.org/2009/08/25/why-wheat-is-an-orphan-crop-conclusion/

The chart above shows the historical average yields for wheat and corn in the US.  Note that until the 1930s the relative yields of the crops were similar and were not changing.  After that time yields of both crops began to rise steadily, but corn yields have grown at a much faster pace.  What explains this difference?

There are several interacting factors behind this, and they work together to create the “orphan” status of wheat as a crop.  Corn is a hybrid crop which enhances its yield and the ease of increasing its yield through breeding.  Wheat is harder to hybridize so it isn’t practical except for extremely high yielding wheat areas like Northern Europe.  Instead, US wheat is largely a “saved seed crop” meaning that the grower can simply save back some of the grain and replant it rather than needing to buy new hybrid seed each year.  That system is workable, particularly if the grower periodically buys some “certified seed” to have a purer stand and to take advantage of breeding improvements.  The down-side of a “saved seed crop” is that there is not a very big private seed industry to invest in the crop.  Most of the breeding is done by University and USDA breeder supported by tax dollars and there is a small private industry as well.  As I said in the previous post, these breeders have done a remarkable job with the resources they have, but in an increasingly ag-unaware society, that support is never generous.

Read more of this story »

]]> http://sustainablog.org/2009/08/25/why-wheat-is-an-orphan-crop-conclusion/feed/ http://sustainablog.org/2009/08/17/wheat-breeders-a-quiet-pillar-of-sustainable-agriculture/ http://sustainablog.org/2009/08/17/wheat-breeders-a-quiet-pillar-of-sustainable-agriculture/#comments Mon, 17 Aug 2009 19:43:29 +0000 Steve Savage http://sustainablog.org/2009/08/17/wheat-breeders-a-quiet-pillar-of-sustainable-agriculture/

I’m doing a series of posts about why wheat has been an orphan crop.  Today I want to talk about UG99 Stem Rust.

In 1999 a new strain of Stem Rust, a severe wheat disease, emerged in Uganda.  It was named UG99, and since then it has spread to other wheat growing areas in Africa and Asia but is expected to spread further.  It is a serious threat to the global human food supply because it causes severe yield losses.

There have been many great articles, blog postings and websites about this important plant disease, so today I will talk about how I think this situation will play out.

I’ll wager that the worst potential from this disease will NOT actually occur. This is not a casual wager - the health or even survival of millions of poor people around the world is at stake.  Some of my wheat breeder friends might not like me to say this (because they legitimately need more funding), but my bet is is still that the breeders will prevail against all odds (and get little credit for it).

I base that qualified optimism on having seen what a remarkable group of scientists called “plant breeders” have been able to achieve in the past.  I’m even more encouraged knowing that they have access to some new tools based on biotechnology.

Read more of this story »

]]> http://sustainablog.org/2009/08/17/wheat-breeders-a-quiet-pillar-of-sustainable-agriculture/feed/ http://sustainablog.org/2009/08/12/why-wheat-has-been-an-orphan-crop-and-why-it-matters/ http://sustainablog.org/2009/08/12/why-wheat-has-been-an-orphan-crop-and-why-it-matters/#comments Wed, 12 Aug 2009 18:50:37 +0000 Steve Savage http://sustainablog.org/2009/08/12/why-wheat-has-been-an-orphan-crop-and-why-it-matters/

I read an article today about a major shortfall in the Kenyan wheat harvest that will drive the need for major imports to meet food needs.  There were three major factors behind this disappointing harvest.  Tight credit and high energy prices kept some growers from even planting.  The rains were not well timed to achieve good yields.  Also a new strain of a very serious wheat disease, UG99 Stem Rust, further reduced yields.

This news has nudged me to write a series of posts about wheat because as a crop, it has a lot more problems than one bad harvest in Kenya.  The Kenya example just stands as an example of the vulnerability of this extremely important world food crop-a crop that is really an “orphan” in today’s agricultural scene.

Read more of this story »

]]> http://sustainablog.org/2009/08/12/why-wheat-has-been-an-orphan-crop-and-why-it-matters/feed/ http://cleantechnica.com/2009/08/11/scientists-force-fungus-to-have-sex-to-create-biofuel/ http://cleantechnica.com/2009/08/11/scientists-force-fungus-to-have-sex-to-create-biofuel/#comments Tue, 11 Aug 2009 01:58:20 +0000 Bryan Nelson http://cleantechnica.com/2009/08/11/scientists-force-fungus-to-have-sex-to-create-biofuel/

Austrian scientists are putting the ‘fun’ in ‘fungus’ by forcing organisms which are usually asexual to have sex instead.

The hope is that the fungus would then be easier to breed, which would allow researchers to create organisms that are more efficient at degrading cellulose for the purpose of making biofuel.

Read more of this story »

]]> http://cleantechnica.com/2009/08/11/scientists-force-fungus-to-have-sex-to-create-biofuel/feed/ http://sustainablog.org/2009/08/07/should-charismatic-megafauna-be-the-face-of-climate-change/ http://sustainablog.org/2009/08/07/should-charismatic-megafauna-be-the-face-of-climate-change/#comments Fri, 07 Aug 2009 22:36:33 +0000 Steve Savage http://sustainablog.org/2009/08/07/should-charismatic-megafauna-be-the-face-of-climate-change/

A polar bear is the perfect example of “Charismatic Megafauna” - the kind of animal whose image can easily be used to generate sympathy.  I care about polar bears as much as anyone, but I’m a little concerned about how images of animals like this are being used to promote Climate Change awareness and to fund-raise for environmental organizations. If we are going to make the personal life-style changes, the new business strategies, and the public policy decisions to counter this threat, we need to do it with a clear-eyed understanding of what is at stake.  The “faces” we should be thinking about are those of starving people in poor nations.

Read more of this story »

]]> http://sustainablog.org/2009/08/07/should-charismatic-megafauna-be-the-face-of-climate-change/feed/ http://cleantechnica.com/2009/07/30/need-a-clean-green-industrial-lubricant-try-sunflower-oil/ http://cleantechnica.com/2009/07/30/need-a-clean-green-industrial-lubricant-try-sunflower-oil/#comments Thu, 30 Jul 2009 07:31:04 +0000 Bryan Nelson http://cleantechnica.com/2009/07/30/need-a-clean-green-industrial-lubricant-try-sunflower-oil/

Researchers at the University of Huelva have proven that high-oleic sunflower oil has the efficiency it takes to be an environmentally-friendly base for industrial lubricant.

The study found that the biolubricant shared similar characteristics to traditional lubricants, only sunflower oil has a lower volatility and is entirely biodegradable. Using the sunflower oil as an alternative should also help reduce the cost of keeping industry clean.

Read more of this story »

]]> http://cleantechnica.com/2009/07/30/need-a-clean-green-industrial-lubricant-try-sunflower-oil/feed/ http://gas2.org/2009/05/05/liveblogging-from-the-advanced-biofuels-symposium-in-san-francisco/ http://gas2.org/2009/05/05/liveblogging-from-the-advanced-biofuels-symposium-in-san-francisco/#comments Tue, 05 May 2009 21:50:03 +0000 Clayton B. Cornell http://gas2.org/2009/05/05/liveblogging-from-the-advanced-biofuels-symposium-in-san-francisco/

The 31st Symposium on Biotechnology for Fuels and Chemicals

One of the world’s most prestigious and established biofuels meetings, the 31st Symposium on Biotechnology for Fuels and Chemicals, is currently underway May 3-6 in San Francisco, with more than 800 scientists expected to attend sessions on topics ranging from commercialization of biofuels and their long-term sustainability to emerging technologies and turning algae into fuel.

We’re liveblogging (on Twitter) from today’s press meeting for the event.

You can also follow the author here, or just search for hashtag #biofuelsymposium.

]]> http://gas2.org/2009/05/05/liveblogging-from-the-advanced-biofuels-symposium-in-san-francisco/feed/