<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
  xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
  xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
  >

<channel>
  <title>Green Options &#187; businessweek</title>
  <link>http://greenoptions.com/tag/businessweek</link>
  <description>Posts tagged 'businessweek'</description>
  <pubDate>Thu, 12 Mar 2009 13:59:31 +0000</pubDate>
  <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
  <language>en</language>
  <item>
    <title>10 Green Ways To Cut Business Costs</title>
    <link>http://ecopreneurist.com/2009/03/12/10-green-ways-to-cut-business-costs/</link>
    <comments>http://ecopreneurist.com/2009/03/12/10-green-ways-to-cut-business-costs/#comments</comments>
    <pubDate>Thu, 12 Mar 2009 13:59:31 +0000</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Jennifer Kaplan</dc:creator>
    
		<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[How To]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Operations]]></category>

    <guid isPermaLink="false">http://ecopreneurist.com/2009/03/12/10-green-ways-to-cut-business-costs/</guid>
    <description><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://ecopreneurist.com/files/2009/03/1135765_low_energy_lamp.jpg"><img class="alignright size-medium wp-image-1418" src="http://go635254.s3.amazonaws.com/ecopreneurist/files/2009/03/1135765_low_energy_lamp.jpg" alt="" width="214" height="300" /></a></p>
<h3>Last week BusinessWeek published an article: <a href="http://images.businessweek.com/ss/08/10/1024_cost_cutting/index.htm">10 Ways To Cut Business Costs</a> and I was pleased to see that four of the 10 were also green.</h3>
<p>It gave me the idea to write about green ways to cut costs in these difficult times. Starting with the four cited in BW, here are some ideas:</p>
<p><a href="http://images.businessweek.com/ss/08/10/1024_cost_cutting/2.htm"><strong>Reduce energy use.</strong></a> Energy is the number one expense for almost one-third of small businesses, and whatever your industry, increasing energy efficiency and reducing energy costs is good for business. <a href="http://www.energystar.gov/index.cfm?c=small_business.sb_index">ENERGY STAR for Small Business</a> has free information, resources and technical advice on hundreds of energy and cost-savings practices.</p>
<p><a href="http://images.businessweek.com/ss/08/10/1024_cost_cutting/3.htm"><strong>Telecommute</strong></a>. Telecommuting is often cited as one of the most valuable benefits to both employers and employees. Telecommuting has been credited with improving work/family balance, supervisor-staff relationships, job satisfaction, worker retention, productivity and career prospects, as well as reducing stress, absenteeism, recruiting, office space and parking costs. It may also be one of the most effective greening practices you can embrace: <a href="http://www.theamericanconsumer.org/2008/04/11/information-technologies-and-telecommuting-good-for-the-economy-good-for-the-environment/">The American Consumer Institute</a> projects that telecommuting alone will cut CO2 emissions by more than a half million tons over the next decade.  <a href="http://www.bestworkplaces.org/employ/index.htm">Best Work Places</a> has great tools for implementing telecommuting and other commuter benefits program.</p>
<p><a href="http://images.businessweek.com/ss/08/10/1024_cost_cutting/5.htm"><strong>Curb travel expenses</strong></a>. Airplane travel, lodging and rental cars can consume almost one-quarter of a business’ carbon footprint and as much as 3% of its revenue. So, reducing the number of business trips you take is an excellent strategy for greening and reducing expenses. (A friend who is an senior exec at a global liquor company told me it cost them $12,000 every time they sent her overseas.) Taking fewer, longer trips is one solution. <a href="http://ecopreneurist.com/2009/02/09/webconferencing-a-green-recession-tactic/">Web conferencing</a> is another. Its a win for productivity, expense reduction and the environment because not traveling means not having to postpone regular office work, saving the expenses of travel and eliminating the carbon output from that travel.</p>
<p><a href="http://ecopreneurist.com/2009/03/12/10-green-ways-to-cut-business-costs/" class="more-link">Read more of this story &#187;</a></p>
]]></description>
    <wfw:commentRss>http://ecopreneurist.com/2009/03/12/10-green-ways-to-cut-business-costs/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>Lessons From The Greenwash Police</title>
    <link>http://ecopreneurist.com/2008/12/15/lessons-from-the-greenwash-police/</link>
    <comments>http://ecopreneurist.com/2008/12/15/lessons-from-the-greenwash-police/#comments</comments>
    <pubDate>Mon, 15 Dec 2008 16:47:40 +0000</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Jennifer Kaplan</dc:creator>
    
		<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Marketing]]></category>

    <guid isPermaLink="false">http://ecopreneurist.com/2008/12/15/lessons-from-the-greenwash-police/</guid>
    <description><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://ecopreneurist.com/files/2008/12/eco_bottle_callouts_ps.jpg"><img class="alignright size-medium wp-image-1065" src="http://go635254.s3.amazonaws.com/ecopreneurist/files/2008/12/eco_bottle_callouts_ps-277x300.jpg" alt="" width="277" height="300" /></a></p>
<h3>A few weeks ago I wrote about how the greenwash continues at Nestle Waters as their CEO Kim Jeffery<a title="CEO Whines, But Still Doesn’t Walk The Walk" rel="bookmark" href="http://planetsave.com/blog/2008/11/14/nestle-waters-ceo-whines-but-still-doesnt-walk-the-walk/"> Whines But Still Doesn’t Walk The Walk</a> in a recent <a href="http://www.businessweek.com/managing/content/nov2008/ca2008117_228891.htm">Businessweek</a> article. Their Director of Corporate Communications &#8220;respectfully disagrees&#8221; with the charges.</h3>
<p>I would have written about it sooner, but I just noticed this response from Jane Lazgin, Director, Corporate Communications, Nestlé Waters North America:</p>
<blockquote><p>We’re pleased you agree we should be talking about our Eco-Shape bottles. Like you, we think reducing the plastic content in our bottles is an important step toward a lighter environmental footprint. The Eco-Shape half-liter bottle uses 30% less plastic than the average juice, soda, or other brand of bottled water containers. And, when more than 70 percent of what we drink comes in a bottle or can, why not choose the lightest beverage package?
<p><a href="http://ecopreneurist.com/2008/12/15/lessons-from-the-greenwash-police/" class="more-link">Read more of this story &#187;</a></p>
]]></description>
    <wfw:commentRss>http://ecopreneurist.com/2008/12/15/lessons-from-the-greenwash-police/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>Wal-Mart Responds to BusinessWeek Organics Article</title>
    <link>http://jeffmcintirestrasburg.greenoptions.com/2007/04/14/wal-mart-responds-to-businessweek-organics-article/</link>
    <comments>http://jeffmcintirestrasburg.greenoptions.com/2007/04/14/wal-mart-responds-to-businessweek-organics-article/#comments</comments>
    <pubDate>Sat, 14 Apr 2007 01:10:52 +0000</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Jeff McIntire-Strasburg</dc:creator>
    
		<category><![CDATA[Big Business]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Business News]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Food Production]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Organic food]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[businessweek]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[organics]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[wal-mart]]></category>

    <guid isPermaLink="false">http://jeffmcintirestrasburg.greenoptions.com/2007/04/14/wal-mart-responds-to-businessweek-organics-article/</guid>
    <description><![CDATA[<p><img src="/files/images/walmartorganics.JPG" border="0" width="430" height="286" /></p>
<p>On Thursday, we <a href="/news/wal_mart_appears_to_be_backing_off_ambitious_growth_plans_for_organic_foods">pointed</a> to a <a href="http://www.businessweek.com/bwdaily/dnflash/content/apr2007/db20070412_005673.htm"><em>BusinessWeek</em> article</a> (via <a href="http://gristmill.grist.org/story/2007/4/12/101956/517">Gristmill</a>) that claimed &#34;A number of organic farmers across the country say that Wal-Mart has backed off of aggressive plans to offer more organic foods.&#34;  Writer Pallavai Gogoi quoted two organic farmers who said that orders from the giant retailer have dried up; the executive director of the Florida Certified Organic Growers &#38; Consumers group further suggested the Wal-Mart&#39;s move into organic foods appeared to misinterpret demand for these items at its stores.  </p>
<p>In response to these claims, Karen Burk, a member of Wal-Mart&#39;s corporate communications team, assured Gogoi that the company remained committed to selling a wide variety of organic foods, and that its original goals had been miscommunicated; furthermore, the company had met or exceeded the goals for organic foods.</p>
<p>Today, Burk submitted a letter to <em>BusinessWeek</em>&#39;s editor claiming that the article created &#34;an erroneous and inaccurate representation of Wal-Mart’s commitment to providing our customers with affordable access to organic products.&#34; A representative of the company passed the letter along to Green Options, and we&#39;ve published it in full below.  Wal-Mart&#39;s efforts to &#34;green&#34; its products and operations will have an enormous effect on the supply of and demand for more sustainable options in the marketplace, so we believe this conversation about the company&#39;s commitments needs to happen through a broad range of media channels.<!--break--></p>
<p>&#160;</p>
<h3>Karen Burk&#39;s letter </h3>
<p>  April 13, 2007     </p>
<p>Dear Editor,     </p>
<p><a href="http://www.businessweek.com/print/bwdaily/dnflash/content/apr2007/db20070412_005673.htm">Pallavi Gogoi’s article</a>, posted April 12, 2007, on Businessweek.com, is an erroneous and inaccurate representation of Wal-Mart’s commitment to providing our customers with affordable access to organic products.     </p>
<p>We have been selling organic products in our Supercenters and Neighborhood Markets for many years and, due to customer demand, announced plans to double the organic food offerings in those locations in March of 2006. We quickly met that goal and even exceeded it in communities where there is an exceptionally high demand for organic offerings. We continue to see steady customer interest in buying quality organics at great prices.     </p>
<p>We realize that the customer base in each of our communities is unique, so we tailor the assortment in each of our stores to meet our customers’ needs.  This is part of our long-standing “store of the community” philosophy of matching the mix of merchandise with the customer base and demand in each specific community.  At a Bear Stearns investors conference on March 8, 2006, Wal-Mart executive Stephen Quinn announced, “We’re soon going to have over 400 SKUs (stock keeping units) of both fresh and brand name superior organic foods available at the Wal-Mart price.” Today we’re proud to offer significantly more than that company-wide, which is completely in line with our plans.  This enables specific locations to customize their assortment of organics to fit the consumers in their community.  This simply makes good business sense. We’ve used this same philosophy of tailoring our merchandise mix for each store for various categories for more than 10 years.     </p>
<p>As a company that’s always working to provide our customers with the best products at the best value, we determine what we’ll buy based on ongoing assessments of quality, price, customer feedback and other factors. Organic apples are one of the top selling organic produce items at Wal-Mart, along with carrots, citrus, lettuce and packaged salads. Far from “backing off,” sales for Wal-Mart’s organic produce for 2006 were at a growth rate well above the industry average of 13.7 percent, based on data from the Organic Trade Association.     </p>
<p>Bottom line, Wal-Mart’s growth in the organics category will continue to be reflective of the demand and we will continue providing our customers with the organic products they desire at low prices.     </p>
<p>Sincerely,     </p>
<p>Karen Burk<br />Wal-Mart Corporate Communications</p>
<p>&#160;</p>
<p>We&#39;re interested to hear what you think about the claims made both in the <em>BusinessWeek</em> article, and in Ms. Burk&#39;s response.  </p>
]]></description>
    <wfw:commentRss>http://jeffmcintirestrasburg.greenoptions.com/2007/04/14/wal-mart-responds-to-businessweek-organics-article/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
  </item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- 153 queries in 0.453 seconds. -->