<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
  xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
  xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
  >

<channel>
  <title>Green Options &#187; California waiver</title>
  <link>http://greenoptions.com/tag/california-waiver</link>
  <description>Posts tagged 'California waiver'</description>
  <pubDate>Fri, 11 Sep 2009 19:40:37 +0000</pubDate>
  <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
  <language>en</language>
  <item>
    <title>The Real Color Problem of President Obama</title>
    <link>http://redgreenandblue.org/2009/09/11/the-real-color-problem-of-president-obama/</link>
    <comments>http://redgreenandblue.org/2009/09/11/the-real-color-problem-of-president-obama/#comments</comments>
    <pubDate>Fri, 11 Sep 2009 19:40:37 +0000</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Susan Kraemer</dc:creator>
    
		<category><![CDATA[Climate Change]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[EC Leader]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Choice]]></category>

    <guid isPermaLink="false">http://redgreenandblue.org/2009/09/11/the-real-color-problem-of-president-obama/</guid>
    <description><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://cleantechnica.com/files/2009/09/racism_communism.jpg"><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-3342" src="http://cleantechnica.com/files/2009/09/racism_communism.jpg" alt="" width="500" height="340" /></a><br />
Oh, they call him a communist. They call him a <strong>Red.</strong> But the actual problem is that President Obama is too Green. Barack Obama is our first truly <strong>Green</strong> President.</p>
<p>This is the real reason the <a href="http://www.desmogblog.com/right-wing-attack-machine-behind-van-jones-affair" target="_blank">fossil industries whose profits are threatened by renewable energy go after him</a> - and <strong>stir up emotional opposition groups</strong> to threaten him with outlandish attacks. Because he has already implemented or funded an extraordinary string of renewable energy initiatives.</p>
<p>He will likely be remembered as an FDR figure; the president who powered the nation with solar and wind.</p>
<p><a href="http://redgreenandblue.org/2009/09/11/the-real-color-problem-of-president-obama/" class="more-link">Read more of this story &#187;</a></p>
]]></description>
    <wfw:commentRss>http://redgreenandblue.org/2009/09/11/the-real-color-problem-of-president-obama/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>Obama&#8217;s EPA Pick Lisa Jackson Supports California Emission Standards</title>
    <link>http://redgreenandblue.org/2009/01/18/obamas-epa-pick-lisa-jackson-supports-california-emission-standards/</link>
    <comments>http://redgreenandblue.org/2009/01/18/obamas-epa-pick-lisa-jackson-supports-california-emission-standards/#comments</comments>
    <pubDate>Sun, 18 Jan 2009 20:18:58 +0000</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Jerry James Stone</dc:creator>
    
		<category><![CDATA[Leader]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Liberal]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Policy]]></category>

    <guid isPermaLink="false">http://redgreenandblue.org/2009/01/18/obamas-epa-pick-lisa-jackson-supports-california-emission-standards/</guid>
    <description><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.hybridcars.com/incentives-laws/obamas-epa-pick-california-rules-25421.html"><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-2240" src="http://go635254.s3.amazonaws.com/redgreenandblue/files/2009/01/usaco2.jpg" alt="" width="480" height="360" />President-elect Barack Obama&#8217;s</a> EPA choice &#8212; Lisa P. Jackson &#8212; will <strong>lead the agency by the virtues of science and law</strong>, rather than political agendas. Uh, finally!</p>

<p>If that alone wasn&#8217;t enough to make me <strong>want to have her babies</strong>, she&#8217;s been quoted for calling Bush&#8217;s EPA the &#8220;Emissions Permissions Agency!&#8221; Uh, marry me now! Seriously.
<p><a href="http://redgreenandblue.org/2009/01/18/obamas-epa-pick-lisa-jackson-supports-california-emission-standards/" class="more-link">Read more of this story &#187;</a></p>
]]></description>
    <wfw:commentRss>http://redgreenandblue.org/2009/01/18/obamas-epa-pick-lisa-jackson-supports-california-emission-standards/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>Bush Gets Schooled by the Senate On Environmental Policy</title>
    <link>http://redgreenandblue.org/2008/09/24/bush-gets-schooled-by-the-senate-on-environmental-policy/</link>
    <comments>http://redgreenandblue.org/2008/09/24/bush-gets-schooled-by-the-senate-on-environmental-policy/#comments</comments>
    <pubDate>Wed, 24 Sep 2008 23:21:29 +0000</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Jerry James Stone</dc:creator>
    
		<category><![CDATA[Climate Change]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Leader]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Liberal]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Other Politics]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Policy]]></category>

    <guid isPermaLink="false">http://redgreenandblue.org/2008/09/24/bush-gets-schooled-by-the-senate-on-environmental-policy/</guid>
    <description><![CDATA[<h3>The Senate met today to review Bush&#8217;s environmental record. It was sparked by the EPA&#8217;s denial of a California waiver to regulate automotive greenhouse gases.</h3>
<p><img class="alignleft" style="float: left" src="http://farm1.static.flickr.com/216/496707580_b1c18eb865_o.jpg" alt="" width="518" height="388" /></p>
<p>The committee entitled, “Bush Administration Environmental Record at Department of Interior and Environmental Protection Agency,” met today. Senator Barbara Boxer called the hearing to explore how the administration has held up with respect to environmental integrity. A driving force behind the committee was the denial of California&#8217;s petition to curb greenhouse emissions by allowing the state to regulate vehicular fuel efficiency. The hearing was also looking into a proposal to loosen rules protecting endangered species. You can watch a full video of the hearing <a href="http://epw.senate.gov/public/index.cfm?FuseAction=Hearings.Hearing&#38;Hearing_ID=724c7b97-802a-23ad-464e-0e960de2af74">here</a>.</p>
<p>Boxer, who is chairwoman of the <a title="U.S. Senate Committee on Environment and Public Works" href="http://www.examiner.com/Subject-U.S._Senate_Committee_on_Environment_and_Public_Works.html">Senate Environment and Public Works Committee</a>, wasn&#8217;t too happy when two high-level officials at the <a title="U.S. Environmental Protection Agency" href="http://www.examiner.com/Subject-U.S._Environmental_Protection_Agency.html">Environmental Protection Agency</a> and Department of Interior failed to show up for the hearing.</p>
<blockquote><p>&#8220;They&#8217;re cowardly and they have been a danger to the people of this country,&#8221; Boxer said.</p></blockquote>
<p>Below is just a taste of what Bush and Co have been up to since taking office.</p>
<h3>A History of Bush&#8217;s <a href="http://www.americanprogress.org/issues/2008/09/environment_timeline.html">Environmental Record</a></h3>
<ul>
<li>Proposed drilling of the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge - October 2000, this was a campaign trail proposition!</li>
<li>Blocks safeguards on arsenic in drinking water, sulfur in diesel, and releases of raw sewage - January 2001, Inauguration Day</li>
<li>Bush repudiates the Kyoto Protocol - March, 2001</li>
<li>178 Countries agree to Kyoto, Bush does not - June 2001</li>
<li>Bush kills more of Clinton&#8217;s safeguards on drinking water - July 2001</li>
<li>Bush cuts funds for renewables - February 2002</li>
<li> Introduces &#8220;Clear Skies&#8221; initiative which allows for more air pollution - February 2002</li>
<li>Bush denies EPA findings on Global Warming - June 2002</li>
<li>Proposes removing wetland protections - January 2003</li>
<li>EPA silences effects of global warming in environmental report - June 2003</li>
<li>Creates &#8220;Healthy Forrest&#8221; initiative which allows more logging - December 2003</li>
<li>Bush delays mercury reduction for 18 years - January 2004</li>
<li>NASA scientists censored by Administration on global warming effects - October 2004</li>
<li>Promises more funding for renewables in State of the Union, breaks the promise five days later - February 2005</li>
<li>Bush supports House bill allowing more smog - October 2005</li>
<li> Wants to lower the price of gas at the expense of air quality - April 2006</li>
<li>Cuts funds for wind and geothermal energy - February 2007</li>
<li>Bush blocks G8 plans to reduce global warming pollution - June 2007</li>
<li>Bush opposes incentives for renewables - February 2008</li>
<li>Bush censors reports on climate change, again - April 2008</li>
</ul>
<p>Oh, and that image was specifically chosen for the &#8220;Dance of the Dwarfs&#8221; title. Made me think of our little &#8220;Decider.&#8221;</p>
<p>Image source: <strong><a href="http://flickr.com/photos/umjanedoan/496707580/">umjanedoan</a></strong> on <strong><a href="http://flickr.com/photos/umjanedoan/496707580/">Flickr</a></strong></p>
]]></description>
    <wfw:commentRss>http://redgreenandblue.org/2008/09/24/bush-gets-schooled-by-the-senate-on-environmental-policy/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>The EPA Decides It Can Mess With Texas</title>
    <link>http://redgreenandblue.org/2008/08/09/the-epa-decides-it-can-mess-with-texas/</link>
    <comments>http://redgreenandblue.org/2008/08/09/the-epa-decides-it-can-mess-with-texas/#comments</comments>
    <pubDate>Sat, 09 Aug 2008 10:26:33 +0000</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Jerry James Stone</dc:creator>
    
		<category><![CDATA[Center]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Choice]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Energy]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Other Politics]]></category>

    <guid isPermaLink="false">http://redgreenandblue.org/2008/08/09/the-epa-decides-it-can-mess-with-texas/</guid>
    <description><![CDATA[<p><img class="alignleft" style="float: left;margin-left: 0px;margin-right: 15px" src="http://www.importers.com/tradeblog/images/corn-to-ethanol.jpg" alt="" width="290" height="340" />The EPA dealt Texas a hard blow on Thursday. It <a href="http://redgreenandblue.org/2008/08/07/epa-denies-texas-request-for-ethanol-waiver/">turned down the state&#8217;s request for a reduction</a> to our Renewable Fuels Standard (RFS). A decision that some environmentalists are sticking in the plus column for biofuels. I can&#8217;t say I agree.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s not that I&#8217;m not on the biofuel bandwagon. I am. Just don&#8217;t run the bandwagon on ethanol. Or any other <a href="http://gas2.org/2008/05/26/genetic-engineering-for-cheaper-cellulosic-ethanol/">bio solution</a> currently available. Yes they all sound very promising. But we need a strong smart solution, not a promise.</p>
<p>I do think it&#8217;s great that biofuels are finally getting real public attention. Especially from the EPA. The agency has so many <a href="http://ap.google.com/article/ALeqM5hwwsvNZPeVERE_DtCJ5Y4x5xfiYQD927Q2IO0">blemishes on it&#8217;s policy record</a> it warrants the <a href="http://www.proactiv.com/">Proactive Solution</a>. But a hasty push towards a biofuel solution is as bad as doing nothing at all. And that&#8217;s what the RFS is, hasty.</p>
<p>Yes, much has been said about the <a href="http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2001/08/010808135444.htm">sustainability of a corn-based solution</a>. And there is that whole <a href="http://www.drivingethanol.org/ethanol_facts/food-and-fuel.aspx">food for fuel</a> argument, and the <a href="http://www.hybridcarnews.org/entry/corn-fueled-ethanol-boom-is-not-sustainable-warns-scientist/">questionable sustainability of the ubiquitous crop</a>. All of which are good arguments. But for me, it&#8217;s a matter of how were just shifting the burden from petroleum to corn: that&#8217;s not a solution in my book.</p>
<p>And it&#8217;s precisely that burden which is being felt in the Lone Star state: their livestock industry is taking <a href="http://www.chron.com/disp/story.mpl/business/5931493.html">a major hit</a>. Why? Because our Renewable Fuel Standard is about quantity, not quality. The current 2008 standard demands 7.76 percent, which is about 9 billion gallons, of renewable fuel. With a definition of a renewable fuel only being &#8220;<a href="http://epa.gov/oms/renewablefuels/420f07019.htm">the opposite of fossil fuel,</a>&#8221; moving forward to the 2022 standard of 36 billion gallons could be catastrophic.</p>
<p>This is why we cannot afford an EPA Chief who is so myopic. Under Stephen Johnson&#8217;s leadership the agency denied <a href="http://planetsave.com/blog/2008/02/27/epa-chief-on-hot-seat-over-california-emissions-denial/">California the power necessary</a> to meet these somewhat ambigous goals. A decision that has the EPA scrambling to try to save face while the Democrats are <a href="http://redgreenandblue.org/2008/07/30/senators-call-for-epa-chief-johnson-to-step-down/">standing at the castle doors</a> with their pitchforks and torches in tow. It&#8217;s like a scene out of Frankenstein. But unlike Frankenstien, the EPA is far from green.</p>
<h3>Related Posts:</h3>
<p><a title="Group Sues EPA for Inaction on Coal Permit" rel="bookmark" href="../2008/03/19/navajo-group-sues-epa-for-stalling-on-air-permit/">Group Sues EPA for Inaction on Coal Permit</a><br />
<a title="EPA Chief on Hot Seat Over California Emissions Denial" rel="bookmark" href="http://planetsave.com/blog/2008/02/27/epa-chief-on-hot-seat-over-california-emissions-denial/">EPA Chief on Hot Seat Over California Emissions Denial</a><br />
<a title="IPCC’s Report Sparks Protest" rel="bookmark" href="http://claytonbodiecornell.greenoptions.com/2007/05/07/biofuels-will-not-solve-global-warming-ipccs-report-sparks-protest/">Biofuels Will Not Solve Global Warming:  IPCC’s Report Sparks Protest</a></p>
<p>Image source: <a href="http://www.theagcompany.com/blog/">Nik Agarwal</a> at <a href="http://www.theagcompany.com/blog/2007/03/04/brazil-japan-ethanol-agreement/">The Air</a></p>
]]></description>
    <wfw:commentRss>http://redgreenandblue.org/2008/08/09/the-epa-decides-it-can-mess-with-texas/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
  </item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- 169 queries in 0.412 seconds. -->