<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
  xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
  xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
  >

<channel>
  <title>Green Options &#187; carbon cap</title>
  <link>http://greenoptions.com/tag/carbon-cap</link>
  <description>Posts tagged 'carbon cap'</description>
  <pubDate>Sat, 04 Oct 2008 01:15:29 +0000</pubDate>
  <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
  <language>en</language>
  <item>
    <title>Sarah Palin on Climate Change: The Causes Don&#8217;t Matter</title>
    <link>http://redgreenandblue.org/2008/10/03/sarah-palin-on-climate-change-the-causes-dont-matter/</link>
    <comments>http://redgreenandblue.org/2008/10/03/sarah-palin-on-climate-change-the-causes-dont-matter/#comments</comments>
    <pubDate>Sat, 04 Oct 2008 01:15:29 +0000</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Timothy B. Hurst</dc:creator>
    
		<category><![CDATA[Climate Change]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Leader]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Liberal]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[US Election]]></category>

    <guid isPermaLink="false">http://redgreenandblue.org/2008/10/03/sarah-palin-on-climate-change-the-causes-dont-matter/</guid>
    <description><![CDATA[<h3>When asked about climate change at the vice-presidential debate, Gov. Sarah Palin said, &#8220;I don&#8217;t want to argue about the causes. What I want to argue about is, how are we going to get there to positively affect the impacts?&#8221;</h3>
<p><a href="http://redgreenandblue.org/files/2008/10/sarahpalincollege.jpg"><img class="alignleft alignnone size-full wp-image-1224" style="float: left;margin-left: 2px;margin-right: 2px" src="http://redgreenandblue.org/files/2008/10/sarahpalincollege.jpg" alt="sarah palin and her many colleges" width="300" height="307" /></a> Generally speaking, if we don&#8217;t know what the cause of a given problem is, but we know there is indeed a problem, how do we devise a strategy capable of adequately addressing it? Or, in the words of Gov. Palin, &#8220;&#8230;how are we going to get there to positively affect the impact&#8221; (whatever that means).</p>
<p>In Thursday night&#8217;s much-ballyhooed vice-presidential debate, the issue of climate change received a bit of attention, but neither candidate was really pushed to develop their statements much beyond their original answers (Biden on his recent comment in a rope-line that the Obama-Biden ticket <a href="http://redgreenandblue.org/2008/09/23/biden-no-new-coal-plants-in-us-video/">didn&#8217;t support clean coal</a> and Palin on her <a href="http://redgreenandblue.org/2008/09/16/palin-changes-position-on-global-warming-then-denies-it/">waffling position on the causes of climate change</a>). But the format didn&#8217;t really allow for deeper exploration either.</p>
<p><a href="http://redgreenandblue.org/search/?q=vice-presidential+debate"><strong>&#62;&#62;More on the vice-presidential debate at RG&#38;B</strong></a>
<p><a href="http://redgreenandblue.org/2008/10/03/sarah-palin-on-climate-change-the-causes-dont-matter/" class="more-link">Read more of this story &#187;</a></p>
]]></description>
    <wfw:commentRss>http://redgreenandblue.org/2008/10/03/sarah-palin-on-climate-change-the-causes-dont-matter/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>Video: Obama on Climate and Energy</title>
    <link>http://redgreenandblue.org/2008/04/11/video-obama-on-climate-and-energy/</link>
    <comments>http://redgreenandblue.org/2008/04/11/video-obama-on-climate-and-energy/#comments</comments>
    <pubDate>Fri, 11 Apr 2008 17:50:19 +0000</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Timothy B. Hurst</dc:creator>
    
		<category><![CDATA[Climate Change]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Energy]]></category>

    <guid isPermaLink="false">http://redgreenandblue.org/2008/04/11/video-obama-on-climate-and-energy/</guid>
    <description><![CDATA[<p>If you ask me, one of the best things about this election season thus far, is that voters who never thought their state&#8217;s caucus or primary would actually matter in deciding a presidential nominee, are finding out that they do matter - quite considerably.  Our friends over at EnviroWonk did an excellent job of covering the <a href="http://envirowonk.com/content/view/141/9/">recent presidential candidates&#8217; whirlwind visits to Missoula, Montana.</a> As a digital media addendum, I&#8217;ve posted a <strong>3-minute clip of Barack Obama speaking on climate and energy</strong> policy from Missoula. A couple of nuggets from the Obama stump:</p>
<ul>
<li>&#8220;<strong>Exxon Mobil made $11 billion last quarter; last quarter!</strong> <strong>And we&#8217;re melting the polar ice caps in the bargain. It&#8217;s a bad deal all around - <a href="http://redgreenandblue.org/2008/04/02/the-big-oil-company-scam/">unless you&#8217;re ExxonMobi</a>l&#8221;</strong></li>
<li>&#8220;<strong>There doesn&#8217;t have to be a contradiction between good environmental policy and good economic policy</strong>.&#8221;</li>
</ul>
<p><code>This story contains additional media. <a href="http://redgreenandblue.org/2008/04/11/video-obama-on-climate-and-energy/">Click here to view the media</a>.</code></p>
]]></description>
    <wfw:commentRss>http://redgreenandblue.org/2008/04/11/video-obama-on-climate-and-energy/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
  </item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- 68 queries in 0.315 seconds. -->