<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
  xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
  xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
  >

<channel>
  <title>Green Options &#187; carbon trust</title>
  <link>http://greenoptions.com/tag/carbon-trust</link>
  <description>Posts tagged 'carbon trust'</description>
  <pubDate>Wed, 23 Sep 2009 21:19:34 +0000</pubDate>
  <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
  <language>en</language>
  <item>
    <title>New &#8220;Wave Energy&#8221; Fund in UK</title>
    <link>http://cleantechnica.com/2009/09/23/new-wave-energy-fund-in-uk/</link>
    <comments>http://cleantechnica.com/2009/09/23/new-wave-energy-fund-in-uk/#comments</comments>
    <pubDate>Wed, 23 Sep 2009 21:19:34 +0000</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Zachary Shahan</dc:creator>
    
		<category><![CDATA[alternative energy]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[technology]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[wave energy]]></category>

    <guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/2009/09/23/new-wave-energy-fund-in-uk/</guid>
    <description><![CDATA[<p><a href='http://cleantechnica.com/files/2009/09/wave.jpg'><img src="http://go635254.s3.amazonaws.com/cleantechnica/files/2009/09/wave.jpg" alt="" width="500" height="333" class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-3473" /></a></p>
<h3>A new energy fund in the UK is looking to improve wave and tidal energy technologies and help put them into use. The new Marine Renewables Proving Fund contains about $36 million worth of new grants.</h3>
<p><a href="http://cleantechnica.com/2009/09/23/new-wave-energy-fund-in-uk/" class="more-link">Read more of this story &#187;</a></p>
]]></description>
    <wfw:commentRss>http://cleantechnica.com/2009/09/23/new-wave-energy-fund-in-uk/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>Ford wants to Replace Sparkplugs with Lasers</title>
    <link>http://gas2.org/2009/07/27/ford-wants-to-replace-sparkplugs-with-lasers/</link>
    <comments>http://gas2.org/2009/07/27/ford-wants-to-replace-sparkplugs-with-lasers/#comments</comments>
    <pubDate>Mon, 27 Jul 2009 20:23:57 +0000</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Amiel Blajchman</dc:creator>
    
		<category><![CDATA[Auto industry]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Engines]]></category>

    <guid isPermaLink="false">http://gas2.org/2009/07/27/ford-wants-to-replace-sparkplugs-with-lasers/</guid>
    <description><![CDATA[<h3><a href="http://gas2.org/files/2008/12/ford-logo.jpg"><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-1335" src="http://go635254.s3.amazonaws.com/gas2/files/2008/12/ford-logo.jpg" alt="" width="500" height="333" /></a></h3>

<h3>Since its humble beginnings in the 19th century, the sparkplug has been a mainstay of the combustion engine.</h3>
<p>Some engineers at Ford, in collaboration with Liverpool University researchers have decided to modernize spark plug technology. Since we&#8217;re in the 21st century, that replacement is going to be lasers.</p>
<p>Yes, I said lasers.
<p><a href="http://gas2.org/2009/07/27/ford-wants-to-replace-sparkplugs-with-lasers/" class="more-link">Read more of this story &#187;</a></p>
]]></description>
    <wfw:commentRss>http://gas2.org/2009/07/27/ford-wants-to-replace-sparkplugs-with-lasers/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>UK Starts World&#8217;s Largest Algae Biofuel Initiative</title>
    <link>http://gas2.org/2008/10/23/uk-starts-worlds-largest-algae-biofuel-initiative/</link>
    <comments>http://gas2.org/2008/10/23/uk-starts-worlds-largest-algae-biofuel-initiative/#comments</comments>
    <pubDate>Thu, 23 Oct 2008 14:37:42 +0000</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Jerry James Stone</dc:creator>
    
		<category><![CDATA[Algae]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Biofuels business]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Carbon Emissions]]></category>

    <guid isPermaLink="false">http://gas2.org/2008/10/23/uk-starts-worlds-largest-algae-biofuel-initiative/</guid>
    <description><![CDATA[<h4>Great Britain hopes that algae-based biofuels can reduce automotive and aviation emissions by 2030, and cut overall emissions by 80% by 2050.</h4>
<p><a href="http://gas2.org/files/2008/10/carfire.jpg"><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-1167" src="http://go635254.s3.amazonaws.com/gas2/files/2008/10/carfire.jpg" alt="" width="528" height="392" /></a></p>

<p>While food-based <a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/environment/2008/oct/23/biofuels-energy/print">biofuels</a> are taking the heat for rising food prices, other solutions - like <a href="http://gas2.org/2008/03/29/first-algae-biodiesel-plant-goes-online-april-1-2008/">algae</a> - are gaining a more serious following. For example, the UK&#8217;s Carbon Trust has announced plans for a project to make algae <a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/environment/biofuels">bio-fuels</a> a commercial reality by the year 2020</p>
<p>But the situation is much more than some &#8220;<a href="http://www.treehugger.com/files/2008/06/biofuels-push-30-million-into-poverty.php">food vs fuel</a>&#8221; finger pointing. The fact that transport accounts for one-quarter of the UK&#8217;s <a href="http://www.treehugger.com/files/2007/06/big-bad-biofuels.php">carbon emissions</a> is major driving factor - pun intended: it&#8217;s also the fastest growing cause of carbon emissions in the UK. If the government&#8217;s target to reduce overall emissions by <strong>80% by 2050</strong> is to be met, then initiatives like this are crucial.</p>
<p><a href="http://gas2.org/2008/10/23/uk-starts-worlds-largest-algae-biofuel-initiative/" class="more-link">Read more of this story &#187;</a></p>
]]></description>
    <wfw:commentRss>http://gas2.org/2008/10/23/uk-starts-worlds-largest-algae-biofuel-initiative/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>New Study Says City-Based Rooftop Wind Power Doesn&#8217;t Pay Off</title>
    <link>http://cleantechnica.com/2008/08/07/new-study-says-rooftop-wind-power-doesnt-pay-off/</link>
    <comments>http://cleantechnica.com/2008/08/07/new-study-says-rooftop-wind-power-doesnt-pay-off/#comments</comments>
    <pubDate>Thu, 07 Aug 2008 20:41:16 +0000</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Ariel Schwartz</dc:creator>
    
		<category><![CDATA[alternative energy]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[wind energy]]></category>

    <guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/2008/08/07/new-study-says-rooftop-wind-power-doesnt-pay-off/</guid>
    <description><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://cleantechnica.com/files/2008/08/2157876067_c1af63f84b_m.jpg"><img class="alignleft size-medium wp-image-815" src="http://go635254.s3.amazonaws.com/cleantechnica/files/2008/08/2157876067_c1af63f84b_m.jpg" alt="urban windmill" width="180" height="240" /></a><br />
A new <a href="http://www.carbontrust.co.uk/NR/rdonlyres/90EC40DE-7EA9-4D11-BE6F-62540CD9BA2A/0/CarbonTrustSmallscaleWindEnergy.pdf"> study</a> put out by the UK&#8217;s <a href="http://www.carbontrust.co.uk/">Carbon Trust</a> reports that domestic windmills in urban locations are actually net carbon <em>emitters</em>, as more energy goes into their production, shipping, and maintenance than is saved by their use.</p>
<p>Additionally, the study <a href="http://news.scotsman.com/uk/Homebased-wind-power-39a-waste.4365493.jp">notes</a> that home wind power could only provide .4% of UK electricity consumption and will only save .6 million tons of carbon dioxide. For reference, the Carbon Trust says that 1.5 TWh could be produced annually using urban windmills—and the UK used 2,700 TWh of energy in 2006.</p>
<p>The reason why urban windmills aren&#8217;t useful is fairly simple. The Carbon Trust <a href="http://www.theregister.co.uk/2008/08/07/rooftop_wind_turbines_eco_own_goal/">explains</a> that small wind turbines require open, exposed locations that have high wind speeds. These locations are usually found in rural areas, which can produce nine times more wind energy than urban areas. Since the output from urban windmills is low, the cost of the resulting energy ends up being high.</p>
<p><a href="http://cleantechnica.com/2008/08/07/new-study-says-rooftop-wind-power-doesnt-pay-off/" class="more-link">Read more of this story &#187;</a></p>
]]></description>
    <wfw:commentRss>http://cleantechnica.com/2008/08/07/new-study-says-rooftop-wind-power-doesnt-pay-off/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
  </item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- 194 queries in 0.469 seconds. -->