<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
  xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
  xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
  >

<channel>
  <title>Green Options &#187; caterpillar tractor company</title>
  <link>http://greenoptions.com/tag/caterpillar-tractor-company</link>
  <description>Posts tagged 'caterpillar tractor company'</description>
  <pubDate>Mon, 15 Sep 2008 17:14:48 +0000</pubDate>
  <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
  <language>en</language>
  <item>
    <title>1977 Magazine Advertisement: &#8216;Solar energy; a practical reality, an expensive dream, which?&#8217;</title>
    <link>http://sustainablog.org/2008/09/15/1977-magazine-advertisement-solar-energy-a-practical-reality-an-expensive-dream-which/</link>
    <comments>http://sustainablog.org/2008/09/15/1977-magazine-advertisement-solar-energy-a-practical-reality-an-expensive-dream-which/#comments</comments>
    <pubDate>Mon, 15 Sep 2008 17:14:48 +0000</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Adam Williams</dc:creator>
    
		<category><![CDATA[Energy &amp; Fuel]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Renewable energy]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Transport]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Video &amp; Media]]></category>

    <guid isPermaLink="false">http://sustainablog.org/2008/09/15/1977-magazine-advertisement-solar-energy-a-practical-reality-an-expensive-dream-which/</guid>
    <description><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://sustainablog.org/files/2008/09/oilflame.jpg"><img class="alignright size-medium wp-image-3521" src="http://go635254.s3.amazonaws.com/sustainablog/files/2008/09/oilflame-300x200.jpg" alt="" width="300" height="200" /></a>Billboard, television and magazine <a href="http://ecopreneurist.com/2008/08/28/ecozone-advertising-that-greens-more-than-the-message/" target="_blank">advertising </a>has been touting green this and green that for a while. I find the ones by companies such as BP and Chevron to be the most questionable, if not outright ridiculous.</p>
<p>In the October 2008 <em>Atlantic </em>magazine, as no doubt in many others, BP runs a full-page ad that says, &#8220;Investing in America&#8217;s most diverse energy portfolio.&#8221; It includes little clip art silhouettes for an oil drop, a gas flame, a wind turbine, the sun and a green plant, triggering our cutesy <em>awwww</em> factor. Then it says:</p>
<blockquote><p>&#8220;Oil in the Gulf. Natural gas in the Rockies. Solar in Maryland. Wind in Texas. Biofuels research in California and Illinois. Diversity starts right here. BP is the largest investor in new U.S. energy development. In fact, over the last five years we&#8217;ve invested more than $28 billion in U.S. energy supplies.&#8221;</p>
</blockquote>
<p>They are providing some concrete details for sure. Now is it true? (And, cynicism aside for a moment, if it is, will it do any good?)
<p><a href="http://sustainablog.org/2008/09/15/1977-magazine-advertisement-solar-energy-a-practical-reality-an-expensive-dream-which/" class="more-link">Read more of this story &#187;</a></p>
]]></description>
    <wfw:commentRss>http://sustainablog.org/2008/09/15/1977-magazine-advertisement-solar-energy-a-practical-reality-an-expensive-dream-which/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
  </item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- 95 queries in 0.587 seconds. -->