<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
  xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
  xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
  >

<channel>
  <title>Green Options &#187; CEQA</title>
  <link>http://greenoptions.com/tag/ceqa</link>
  <description>Posts tagged 'CEQA'</description>
  <pubDate>Tue, 21 Jul 2009 21:27:14 +0000</pubDate>
  <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
  <language>en</language>
  <item>
    <title>Chevron Appeals Ruling Halting Bay Area Refinery Expansion</title>
    <link>http://redgreenandblue.org/2009/07/21/chevron-appeals-ruling-halting-bay-area-refinery-expansion/</link>
    <comments>http://redgreenandblue.org/2009/07/21/chevron-appeals-ruling-halting-bay-area-refinery-expansion/#comments</comments>
    <pubDate>Tue, 21 Jul 2009 21:27:14 +0000</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Tom Schueneman</dc:creator>
    
		<category><![CDATA[Climate Change]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Energy]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Leader]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Policy]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[U.S.]]></category>

    <guid isPermaLink="false">http://redgreenandblue.org/2009/07/21/chevron-appeals-ruling-halting-bay-area-refinery-expansion/</guid>
    <description><![CDATA[<p><img class="alignleft size-full wp-image-3407" style="border: 0;float: left;margin: 7px" src="http://go635254.s3.amazonaws.com/redgreenandblue/files/2009/07/chevron_richmond.jpg" alt="Richmond refinery" width="250" height="166" />Chevron Corporation <a href="http://www.reuters.com/article/marketsNews/idUSN2012285920090720" target="_self">filed an appeal</a> in the California State Court of Appeals yesterday in hopes of overturning a state Superior Court ruling made in Contra Costa County by Judge Barbara Zuniga, who tossed out Chevron&#8217;s environmental impact report for the proposed $1 billion expansion of its 107-year-old Richmond refinery, stating the report did not fully comply with the California Environmental Quality Act (<a href="http://ceres.ca.gov/ceqa/flowchart/index.html" target="_self">CEQA</a>).</p>
<p>Specifically, Zuniga ruled that Chevron&#8217;s environmental analysis failed to account for reductions in greenhouse gas emissions, saying the report lacked a detailed explanation for how the addition of a hydrogen plant and distribution pipeline would change pollution levels from the refinery.</p>
<p><a href="http://redgreenandblue.org/2009/07/21/chevron-appeals-ruling-halting-bay-area-refinery-expansion/" class="more-link">Read more of this story &#187;</a></p>
]]></description>
    <wfw:commentRss>http://redgreenandblue.org/2009/07/21/chevron-appeals-ruling-halting-bay-area-refinery-expansion/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>Clear-Cutting Greenhouse Gas Emissions Must be Avoided or Mitigated Under CEQA</title>
    <link>http://ecoscraps.com/2008/12/26/clear-cutting-greenhouse-gas-emissions-must-be-avoided-or-mitigated-under-ceqa/</link>
    <comments>http://ecoscraps.com/2008/12/26/clear-cutting-greenhouse-gas-emissions-must-be-avoided-or-mitigated-under-ceqa/#comments</comments>
    <pubDate>Fri, 26 Dec 2008 19:21:25 +0000</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Jennifer Lance</dc:creator>
    
		<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Climate Change]]></category>

    <guid isPermaLink="false">http://ecoscraps.com/2008/12/26/clear-cutting-greenhouse-gas-emissions-must-be-avoided-or-mitigated-under-ceqa/</guid>
    <description><![CDATA[<h3><a href="http://go635254.s3.amazonaws.com/ecoscraps/files/2008/12/loggingtruck.jpg"><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-1061" src="http://go635254.s3.amazonaws.com/ecoscraps/files/2008/12/loggingtruck.jpg" alt="logging practices must mitigate for greenhouse emissions" width="500" height="333" /></a>All timber harvest plans (THP) in California must comply with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA); however, logging companies and the state have largely ignored the enormous increase in global warming emissions caused by clear-cut logging practices.</h3>
<p>CEQA requires greenhouse gas emissions resulting from a project to be quantified, as well as, THPs must identify ways to avoid or mitigate the emissions. According to the<a href="http://www.biologicaldiversity.org/news/press_releases/2008/logging-emissions-12-18-2008.html" target="_blank"> Center for Biological Diversity</a>, the conservation group calling for the greenhouse gas requirements of CEQA to be followed:</p>
<blockquote><p>Requests to clear-cut thousands of acres of California’s forests are currently before the state Department of Forestry . For example, the Swamped Timber Harvest Plan would alone clear-cut 424 acres. None of the requests address carbon emissions, however, as required by CEQA. <strong>This is an especially serious problem given that the published science shows that clear-cutting can remove more carbon from the forest than any other disturbance, including fire</strong>.</p></blockquote>
]]></description>
    <wfw:commentRss>http://ecoscraps.com/2008/12/26/clear-cutting-greenhouse-gas-emissions-must-be-avoided-or-mitigated-under-ceqa/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
  </item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- 123 queries in 0.378 seconds. -->