<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
  xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
  xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
  >

<channel>
  <title>Green Options &#187; charles darwin</title>
  <link>http://greenoptions.com/tag/charles-darwin</link>
  <description>Posts tagged 'charles darwin'</description>
  <pubDate>Thu, 10 Sep 2009 21:17:46 +0000</pubDate>
  <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
  <language>en</language>
  <item>
    <title>A Creation Neither Perfect Nor Complete - Darwin and Early Theories of Evolution</title>
    <link>http://ecoworldly.com/2009/09/10/a-creation-neither-perfect-nor-complete-early-theories-of-evolution-pt-i/</link>
    <comments>http://ecoworldly.com/2009/09/10/a-creation-neither-perfect-nor-complete-early-theories-of-evolution-pt-i/#comments</comments>
    <pubDate>Thu, 10 Sep 2009 21:17:46 +0000</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Michael Ricciardi</dc:creator>
    
		<category><![CDATA[About Animals]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[About Science]]></category>

    <guid isPermaLink="false">http://ecoworldly.com/2009/09/10/a-creation-neither-perfect-nor-complete-early-theories-of-evolution-pt-i/</guid>
    <description><![CDATA[<h5 style="text-align: center"><a rel="attachment wp-att-3923" href="http://ecoworldly.com/2009/09/10/a-creation-neither-perfect-nor-complete-early-theories-of-evolution-pt-i/darwin2/"><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-3923" src="http://go635254.s3.amazonaws.com/ecoworldly/files/2009/09/darwin2.jpg" alt="Darwin" width="500" height="449" /></a></h5>
<h5 style="text-align: center">Charles Darwin, 1879</h5>

<h3>In this the 150th anniversary year of the publication of Darwin’s <em>On the Origin of Species</em> (and the 200th anniversary  year of his birth), it is worth returning to that era of profound discovery and re-examining some of the controversies and  earlier evolutionary theories begotten in the years just preceding its publication.</h3>
<p>Today (and ever since Origin), the core,  controversial idea of evolution tends to be rather simplistically summed up as: &#8220;We are descended from apes&#8221;. Of course, Darwinism,  as it came to be called, was far more than this simplistic distillation. Even still, Darwin’s description of evolution as “descent with modification”, as well as his positing of vast geologic time scales, the agencies of natural and sexual selection, and a  common ancestry to all living creatures, were not the <em>fundamental</em>, conceptual causes of the controversies.</p>
<p>
<p><a href="http://ecoworldly.com/2009/09/10/a-creation-neither-perfect-nor-complete-early-theories-of-evolution-pt-i/" class="more-link">Read more of this story &#187;</a></p>
]]></description>
    <wfw:commentRss>http://ecoworldly.com/2009/09/10/a-creation-neither-perfect-nor-complete-early-theories-of-evolution-pt-i/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>St. Charles Darwin Unveiled: Catholics, Anglicans Finally Agreed on Evolution</title>
    <link>http://ecoworldly.com/2008/09/19/st-charles-darwin-unveiled-catholics-anglicans-finally-agreed-on-evolution/</link>
    <comments>http://ecoworldly.com/2008/09/19/st-charles-darwin-unveiled-catholics-anglicans-finally-agreed-on-evolution/#comments</comments>
    <pubDate>Fri, 19 Sep 2008 14:16:32 +0000</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Sam Aola Ooko</dc:creator>
    
		<category><![CDATA[In Global]]></category>

    <guid isPermaLink="false">http://ecoworldly.com/2008/09/19/st-charles-darwin-unveiled-catholics-anglicans-finally-agreed-on-evolution/</guid>
    <description><![CDATA[<p><a href='http://ecoworldly.com/files/2008/09/charles-darwin.jpg'><img src="http://go635254.s3.amazonaws.com/ecoworldly/files/2008/09/charles-darwin.jpg" alt="Catholics, Anglicans Finally Agreed on Evolution" width="329" height="450" class="alignnone size-full wp-image-1672" /></a> Isn&#8217;t it uncanny that on the eve of the bicentenary of the birth of Charles Darwin, and the 150th anniversary of the appearance of &#8216;<em>On the Origin of Species&#8217;</em> - the Bible of much vilified evolution theorists - Christendom might just be unveiling the latest saint?</p>
<p>This week, the doubtful naysayers may have been proven wrong: the Vatican has lifted a centuries-old veil of official hostility towards and denial of the Theory of Evolution to admit it was actually compatible with the Bible. </p>
<p>The <a href="http://www.cofe.anglican.org/">Church of England</a>, as the Anglican Church is officially known in the UK, wasn&#8217;t going to be left behind and issued their own <a href="http://www.cofe.anglican.org/news/pr6808.html">confirmation</a> that Darwin&#8217;s theory never conflicted with the literal biblical account of creation.</p>
<p><a href="http://ecoworldly.com/2008/09/19/st-charles-darwin-unveiled-catholics-anglicans-finally-agreed-on-evolution/" class="more-link">Read more of this story &#187;</a></p>
]]></description>
    <wfw:commentRss>http://ecoworldly.com/2008/09/19/st-charles-darwin-unveiled-catholics-anglicans-finally-agreed-on-evolution/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
  </item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- 123 queries in 0.370 seconds. -->