<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
  xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
  xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
  >

<channel>
  <title>Green Options &#187; chemical</title>
  <link>http://greenoptions.com/tag/chemical</link>
  <description>Posts tagged 'chemical'</description>
  <pubDate>Mon, 31 Aug 2009 21:13:29 +0000</pubDate>
  <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
  <language>en</language>
  <item>
    <title>Grading “Green” or Just How Eco-Friendly Is My Laundry Detergent?</title>
    <link>http://inspiredeconomist.com/2009/08/31/grading-green/</link>
    <comments>http://inspiredeconomist.com/2009/08/31/grading-green/#comments</comments>
    <pubDate>Mon, 31 Aug 2009 21:13:29 +0000</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Lisa Wojnovich</dc:creator>
    
		<category><![CDATA[Inspiring Ideas]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Organizations]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Unique Ideas]]></category>

    <guid isPermaLink="false">http://inspiredeconomist.com/2009/08/31/grading-green/</guid>
    <description><![CDATA[<p><img class="alignleft size-full wp-image-1630" src="http://go635254.s3.amazonaws.com/inspiredeconomist/files/2009/08/eco-dishwasher-detergent.jpg" alt="Eco-Friendly Dishwasher Detergents" width="240" height="192" />The last time you went to the grocery store or the local <a href="http://inspiredeconomist.com/2006/11/09/wal-mart-announces-plan-to-work-with-suppliers-to-substitute-20-chemicals-of-concern-over-two-years/" target="_self">Walmart</a>, did you count the number of cleaners, soaps, and detergents that labeled themselves “green.” At Target last week while attempting to find the laundry detergent that was supposed to be on sale, I was boggled by all the new green chemicals that I’d never heard of before my shopping trip. I wasn’t certain what most of them did — much less exactly how “green” they really were.</p>
<p><a href="http://inspiredeconomist.com/2009/08/31/grading-green/" class="more-link">Read more of this story &#187;</a></p>
]]></description>
    <wfw:commentRss>http://inspiredeconomist.com/2009/08/31/grading-green/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>Bananas!* Exposes Dole&#8217;s Poisonous Practices</title>
    <link>http://ecoworldly.com/2009/08/15/bananas-exposes-doles-poisonous-practices/</link>
    <comments>http://ecoworldly.com/2009/08/15/bananas-exposes-doles-poisonous-practices/#comments</comments>
    <pubDate>Sat, 15 Aug 2009 03:30:21 +0000</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Rhonda Winter</dc:creator>
    
		<category><![CDATA[About Environment]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[About Politics]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[In The Americas]]></category>

    <guid isPermaLink="false">http://ecoworldly.com/2009/08/15/bananas-exposes-doles-poisonous-practices/</guid>
    <description><![CDATA[<h4>An explosive new documentary, <a title="Bananas!*" href="http://www.bananasthemovie.com/" target="_self">Bananas!*</a>, examines global food politics by following the crusade of lawyer Juan J. Dominguez, as he fights for the rights of thousands of <a title="banana" href="http://rhondawinter.com/politicalbanana.html" target="_self">banana</a> plantation workers in Nicaragua who have been made sterile from exposure to the <a title="DBCP Dibromo Chloropropane" href="http://www.associatedcontent.com/article/443300/banned_pesticide_dbcp_costs_dole_25.html" target="_self">banned pesticide DBCP</a> (Dibromo Chloropropane). This toxic chemical has been shown to cause cancer in animals, sterility in humans, and has been banned in most of the Americas since 1977. <strong>The film follows Dominguez as he fights the behemoth <a title="Dole Food Company" href="http://www.knowmore.org/wiki/index.php?title=Dole_Food_Company%2C_Inc." target="_self">Dole Company</a> for restitution for the abused Nicaraguan workers in the US courts.</strong></h4>
<p style="text-align: center">This post contains additional media. <a href="http://ecoworldly.com/2009/08/15/bananas-exposes-doles-poisonous-practices/">Click here to view the full post</a>.</p>
<h4>The <a title="Dole Food Company" href="http://intercontinentalcry.org/demand-a-full-investigation-of-dole-food-company/" target="_self">Dole Food Company</a> is now attempting to sue the filmmakers and producers, and has <strong>unsuccessfully attempted to block screenings of the movie at the Los Angeles Film Festival earlier this year</strong>. <a title="WG Film" href="http://www.wgfilm.com/english/home/" target="_self">WG Film</a>, <a title="Frederik Gertten" href="http://www.imdb.com/name/nm0314995/" target="_self">Fredrik Gertten </a>and <a title="Margarete Jangard" href="http://www.zoominfo.com/people/Jang%C3%83%C2%A5rd_Margarete_1235613736.aspx" target="_self">Margarete Jangård</a>, the creators of <a title="Bananas!*" href="http://atnzone.com/nz/2009/07/28/movie-review-bananas/" target="_self">Bananas!*</a>, have retained a First Amendment rights lawyer to <a title="fight back against Dole" href="http://www.bananasthemovie.com/first-amendment-attorney-to-take-on-dole-lawsuit/#article" target="_self">fight back against the multinational giant Dole</a>. The corporation&#8217;s lawsuit claims that the film is defamatory and false toward Dole Food. <strong><a title="Bananas!*" href="http://www.bananasthemovie.com/show/the-film/" target="_self">Bananas!*</a> is definitely a movie that the<a title="Dole does not want you to see Bananas!*" href="http://uprisingradio.org/home/?p=8451" target="_self"> Dole Corporation does not want you to see</a>. It is presently scheduled for wide release this October.</strong></h4>
]]></description>
    <wfw:commentRss>http://ecoworldly.com/2009/08/15/bananas-exposes-doles-poisonous-practices/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>Growing Plastic: A New Use for Biomass</title>
    <link>http://inspiredeconomist.com/2009/06/19/growing-plastic-2/</link>
    <comments>http://inspiredeconomist.com/2009/06/19/growing-plastic-2/#comments</comments>
    <pubDate>Fri, 19 Jun 2009 12:00:10 +0000</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Lisa Wojnovich</dc:creator>
    
		<category><![CDATA[Conservation]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Interesting Ideas]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Sustainable Manufacturing]]></category>

    <guid isPermaLink="false">http://inspiredeconomist.com/2009/06/19/growing-plastic-2/</guid>
    <description><![CDATA[<h4><img class="alignleft size-full wp-image-1505" src="http://go635254.s3.amazonaws.com/inspiredeconomist/files/2009/06/miscanthus.jpg" alt="A field of miscanthus, one of several crops grown to produce biomass" width="240" height="180" />In the constant push for ever newer and greener technology and energy, we sometimes forget that it is often both simpler and cheaper to revisit old techniques in new ways. And that’s exactly what <a href="http://newscenter.lbl.gov/feature-stories/2009/06/11/replacing-petros-with-biomass/" target="_blank">a group of researchers in California</a> has done.</h4>
<p><a href="http://inspiredeconomist.com/2009/06/19/growing-plastic-2/" class="more-link">Read more of this story &#187;</a></p>
]]></description>
    <wfw:commentRss>http://inspiredeconomist.com/2009/06/19/growing-plastic-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>Canada Says Chemicals Used In Cosmetics Could Cause Cancer</title>
    <link>http://planetsave.com/blog/2009/02/02/canada-says-chemicals-used-in-cosmetics-could-cause-cancer/</link>
    <comments>http://planetsave.com/blog/2009/02/02/canada-says-chemicals-used-in-cosmetics-could-cause-cancer/#comments</comments>
    <pubDate>Mon, 02 Feb 2009 13:20:53 +0000</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Andrew Williams</dc:creator>
    
		<category><![CDATA[Health]]></category>

    <guid isPermaLink="false">http://planetsave.com/blog/2009/02/02/canada-says-chemicals-used-in-cosmetics-could-cause-cancer/</guid>
    <description><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://go635254.s3.amazonaws.com/planetsave/files/2009/02/cosmetics-canada-toxic.jpg"><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-3893" src="http://go635254.s3.amazonaws.com/planetsave/files/2009/02/cosmetics-canada-toxic.jpg" alt="" width="500" height="377" /></a></p>

<p><strong>In shocking news, the <a title="canada cosmetics" href="http://www.ens-newswire.com/ens/jan2009/2009-01-30-01.asp" target="_blank">Canadian government has announced that two chemicals used in cosmetics are carcinogens that are severely harmful to human health</a>. A further two chemicals found in lipstick and other personal care products have also been found to be highly toxic to the environment.</strong></p>
<p>The two cancer-causing chemicals, isoprene and epichlorohydrin, have been added to the <a title="cosmetic ingredient hotlist" href="http://www.hc-sc.gc.ca/cps-spc/person/cosmet/info-ind-prof/_hot-list-critique/prohibited-eng.php" target="_blank">Cosmetic Ingredient Hotlist</a> to prevent their future use in cosmetics. Health Canada is also proposing that manufacturers use best-available technology to control releases of isoprene.</p>
<p>The cosmetics chemicals posing a danger to the environment are the siloxanes D4 and D5, which are used as emollients to soften the skin and are found in most personal care products on the market in Canada and the United States.</p>
<p><a href="http://planetsave.com/blog/2009/02/02/canada-says-chemicals-used-in-cosmetics-could-cause-cancer/" class="more-link">Read more of this story &#187;</a></p>
]]></description>
    <wfw:commentRss>http://planetsave.com/blog/2009/02/02/canada-says-chemicals-used-in-cosmetics-could-cause-cancer/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>CO2 vs. Fluorocarbons: The Battle for the Automotive Air Conditioning Market Rages On</title>
    <link>http://inspiredeconomist.com/2008/12/23/co2-vs-fluorocarbons-the-battle-for-the-automotive-air-conditioning-market-rages-on/</link>
    <comments>http://inspiredeconomist.com/2008/12/23/co2-vs-fluorocarbons-the-battle-for-the-automotive-air-conditioning-market-rages-on/#comments</comments>
    <pubDate>Tue, 23 Dec 2008 23:35:25 +0000</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Lisa Wojnovich</dc:creator>
    
		<category><![CDATA[Conservation]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Transportation]]></category>

    <guid isPermaLink="false">http://inspiredeconomist.com/2008/12/23/co2-vs-fluorocarbons-the-battle-for-the-automotive-air-conditioning-market-rages-on/</guid>
    <description><![CDATA[<p><img class="alignleft size-full wp-image-1020" src="http://go635254.s3.amazonaws.com/inspiredeconomist/files/2008/12/fluorocarbon-refrigerants-11.jpg" alt="Cars driving on a Houston highway" width="240" height="160" /></p>
<h4>Ever heard of <a href="http://www.1234facts.com/index.html" target="_blank">HFO-1234yf?</a> No? Well, give it time. You will. That random alphanumeric string is the trade name of a new chemical refrigerant (whose technical name is an even bigger mouthful, 2,3,3,3-tetrafluoroprop-1-ene) jointly developed by <a href="http://acsource.net/acforum/viewtopic.php?f=1&#38;t=7115" target="_blank">Honeywell</a> and <a href="http://www2.dupont.com/Media_Center/en_US/daily_news/december/article20081222.html" target="_blank">Dupont</a>. And after December 8, when the Society of Automotive Engineers’ International Research Program <a href="http://www.reuters.com/article/pressRelease/idUS99387+08-Dec-2008+PRN20081208?symbol=HON.N" target="_blank">endorsed</a> it as the best answer to Europe’s new, stringent, and impending regulations governing mobile air conditioning (MAC) systems, HFO-1234yf looks to be poised to become the latest industry standard.</h4>
<p><a href="http://inspiredeconomist.com/2008/12/23/co2-vs-fluorocarbons-the-battle-for-the-automotive-air-conditioning-market-rages-on/" class="more-link">Read more of this story &#187;</a></p>
]]></description>
    <wfw:commentRss>http://inspiredeconomist.com/2008/12/23/co2-vs-fluorocarbons-the-battle-for-the-automotive-air-conditioning-market-rages-on/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>Bamboo Fiber: Greenwash or Treasure?</title>
    <link>http://feelgoodstyle.com/2008/06/26/bamboo-fiber-greenwash-or-treasure/</link>
    <comments>http://feelgoodstyle.com/2008/06/26/bamboo-fiber-greenwash-or-treasure/#comments</comments>
    <pubDate>Thu, 26 Jun 2008 23:31:46 +0000</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Delia Montgomery</dc:creator>
    
		<category><![CDATA[Fashion]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Feelgood Style]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Materials]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Reviews]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[decor]]></category>

    <guid isPermaLink="false">http://feelgoodstyle.com/2008/06/26/bamboo-fiber-greenwash-or-treasure/</guid>
    <description><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://feelgoodstyle.com/files/2008/06/mosobamboostalks.jpg"><img class="alignleft size-full wp-image-426" src="http://go635254.s3.amazonaws.com/feelgoodstyle/files/2008/06/mosobamboostalks.jpg" alt="" width="250" height="188" /></a>The bamboo species for textile production is <em>Phyllostachys heterocycla pubescens</em>, commonly known as <em>Moso bamboo</em>. It is primarily grown in China where there are the most textile mills. <em>Moso bamboo</em> is the largest of the temperate zone bamboo species, is grown on family-owned farms, provides edible shoots, but is not what beloved panda bears eat. All sounds good until the manufacturing process is investigated.</p>
<p>Common production from plant to fabric is not as green as eco-minded people would like. Michael Lackman of LotusOrganics.com contributes to an impressive blog his family originated. He shares some interesting facts from extensive research.</p>
<p>Scrutiny is gaining attention because heavy and toxic chemicals are typically utilized to process bamboo into fabric. The alternative to chemical is mechanical processing. The mechanical method means crushing the woody parts of the bamboo plant followed by natural enzymes to break the walls into a mushy mass so that the natural fibers can be combed out and spun into yarn. This is essentially the same eco-friendly manufacturing method used to develop flax or hemp linen.</p>
<p><a href="http://feelgoodstyle.com/2008/06/26/bamboo-fiber-greenwash-or-treasure/" class="more-link">Read more of this story &#187;</a></p>
]]></description>
    <wfw:commentRss>http://feelgoodstyle.com/2008/06/26/bamboo-fiber-greenwash-or-treasure/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>Eco-Effective Decisions: What Hormones Belong to Who?</title>
    <link>http://elizabethredmond.greenoptions.com/2007/06/15/eco-effective-decisions-what-hormones-belong-to-who/</link>
    <comments>http://elizabethredmond.greenoptions.com/2007/06/15/eco-effective-decisions-what-hormones-belong-to-who/#comments</comments>
    <pubDate>Fri, 15 Jun 2007 14:31:53 +0000</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Elizabeth Redmond</dc:creator>
    
		<category><![CDATA[Biology and Biodiversity]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Environment]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Food Production]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Health and Health Products]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Healthy Intimacy]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Outdoors]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Personal Care]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[chemical]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[detergents]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[erosion]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[fish]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[hormone+disruptors]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[runoff]]></category>

    <guid isPermaLink="false">http://elizabethredmond.greenoptions.com/2007/06/15/eco-effective-decisions-what-hormones-belong-to-who/</guid>
    <description><![CDATA[<p><img src="/files/images/fish_spawning_0.jpg" border="0" width="240" height="181" />Recent headlines have been telling us about a class of chemical detergents or surfactants (nonylphenol ethoxylates, NPE’s) found in many industrial and household cleaners that have been reported to cause male fish to develop female characteristics. This hormone instability is commonly due to foreign “hormone disruptors”. The hormone instability occurs when a foreign chemical is introduced to the body and imitates our natural hormones. The toxins bind to the same sites in our body where natural hormones bind, therein blocking the site from our natural hormones.</p>
<p>This chemical disruption is not going to facilitate spawning! Do we dare to question what these chemicals are doing to us? A World Wildlife Foundation Briefing on the chemical states that &#34;NPEs has been shown to mimic the action of the female hormone oestrogen, and it is a potential factor in the increasing incidence of reproductive organ disorders and decreasing sperm counts in men.&#34;</p>
<p>The Sierra Club has asked the Environmental Protection Agency to ban this compound in areas where wastewater treatment plants are not equipped to extract it. The greater question is, how is it getting into our waterways and estuaries and effecting wildlife? In this I respond with: water is the most abundant molecule on earth, it is also referred to as the universal solvent. Combine these two facts and we get a lot of water that is not clean.<!--break--></p>
<p>The World Wildlife Foundation report on how NPEs are reaching our water environment:</p>
<ul>
<li>37% NPEs via the sewer system</li>
<li>46% via sludge spreading on agricultural land</li>
</ul>
<p>Chemical pollutants that cause hazardous runoff come from lawn fertilizers, industrial pesticides, household cleaners, leaky tailpipes, industrial waste, store byproduct (such as a drycleaners), this runoff is not good. If you take this information inside with the newspaper, you realize that the pollution in your home is due to off gassing from materials you bring in that were treated with chemicals (everything from carpet to magazines) and cleaning products.</p>
<p>So here is the simple solution: just read your labels. We can’t eradicate chemical pollution immediately, but we can start acting consciously by purchasing safe and simple cleaning products, fertilizers, and food. A rule to shop by, if you can’t read it, don’t eat it (remember that 46% of this stuff is spread on our industrial farms-buy organic), and if you can’t pronounce it, don’t spray it on your counter (when you wash your hands this water goes down the drain to the treatment plant…).</p>
<p>One of the scariest commercials on TV right now is for a cleaning company whose products contain compounds we should not come in oral contact with. It shows the mom cleaning the countertop with this product then her child eating cookies from a box that just tipped over onto the same countertop. The mom is relieved because she just cleaned the counter from harmful bacteria, but simultaneously she could have put harmful chemicals on it that are equally as disrupting to her child’s health.</p>
<p>One sixth of the world’s population does not have access to safe drinking water. Most water born problems are due to bacteria that cause them to contract harmful diseases. We don’t need to add chemical hormone disruption to this list. In purchasing safe cleaning products, food, and supporting safe practices we are creating a safer living environment, reducing pollution in our waterways, enabling biodiversity, promoting natural reproduction, and helping to provide safer drinking water for the entire world.</p>
<p>WWF: <a href="http://www.ngo.grida.no/wwfneap/Publication/briefings/Nonylphenol.pdf">Nonylphenol Ethoxylates (NPE)</a></p>
<p>The Green Report: <a href="/news/ban_sought_on_detergent_ingredient">Ban Sought on Detergent Ingredient</a></p>
<p>Image Credit: <a href="http://scrippsnews.ucsd.edu/Releases/?releaseID=624">Scripps Institution of Oceanography </a></p>
]]></description>
    <wfw:commentRss>http://elizabethredmond.greenoptions.com/2007/06/15/eco-effective-decisions-what-hormones-belong-to-who/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
  </item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- 279 queries in 0.618 seconds. -->