<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
  xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
  xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
  >

<channel>
  <title>Green Options &#187; christopher booker</title>
  <link>http://greenoptions.com/tag/christopher-booker</link>
  <description>Posts tagged 'christopher booker'</description>
  <pubDate>Mon, 17 Nov 2008 15:31:15 +0000</pubDate>
  <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
  <language>en</language>
  <item>
    <title>The Bias and Logical Fallacies of Christopher Booker&#8217;s &#8216;Freezing Heat&#8217;</title>
    <link>http://ecoworldly.com/2008/11/17/the-bias-and-logical-fallacies-of-christopher-bookers-freezing-heat/</link>
    <comments>http://ecoworldly.com/2008/11/17/the-bias-and-logical-fallacies-of-christopher-bookers-freezing-heat/#comments</comments>
    <pubDate>Mon, 17 Nov 2008 15:31:15 +0000</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Gavin Hudson</dc:creator>
    
		<category><![CDATA[In Europe]]></category>

    <guid isPermaLink="false">http://ecoworldly.com/2008/11/17/the-bias-and-logical-fallacies-of-christopher-bookers-freezing-heat/</guid>
    <description><![CDATA[<h3>The power of the pen, when used irresponsibly, serves not to illuminate and progress human discourse, but to confuse and stifle it. Christopher Booker&#8217;s article does a disservice to climate skeptics and climate activists alike.</h3>
<p><a href="http://ecoworldly.com/files/2008/11/writing-pen.jpg"></a><a href="http://ecoworldly.com/files/2008/11/writing-pen.jpg"><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-2008" src="http://go635254.s3.amazonaws.com/ecoworldly/files/2008/11/writing-pen.jpg" alt="The power of the pen, when used irresponsibly, serves not to illuminate, but to confuse." width="500" height="375" /></a>Christopher Booker&#8217;s article, &#8220;<a href="http://www.telegraph.co.uk/opinion/main.jhtml?xml=/opinion/2008/11/16/do1610.xml" target="_blank">The world has never seen such freezing heat</a>,&#8221; published yesterday in the UK&#8217;s Telegraph, attempts to come across as a shocking exposé of a blunder big enough potentially to bring climate change science to its knees. It falls considerably short. Instead, the writing is simply the latest in a series of posts designed to push the author&#8217;s own personal opinion <a href="http://www.telegraph.co.uk/opinion/main.jhtml?view=DETAILS&#38;grid=A1YourView&#38;xml=/opinion/2008/10/26/do2611.xml" target="_blank">against renewable energy</a> and climate change action. This may be of little surprise as Mr. Booker has previously summed up climate change as &#8220;<a href="http://www.telegraph.co.uk/opinion/main.jhtml?view=DETAILS&#38;grid=A1YourView&#38;xml=/opinion/2008/09/14/do1402.xml" target="_blank">chicanery</a>.&#8221;</p>
<p>Unfortunately, the credibility of Mr. Booker&#8217;s article as a rational piece of scientific journalism falls apart as early as the first paragraph under the weight of his personal bias. Moreover, the writing is so riddled with logical fallacies that the article actually does an injustice to the &#8220;climate skeptics&#8221; whose arguments it seeks to support.</p>
<p><a href="http://ecoworldly.com/2008/11/17/the-bias-and-logical-fallacies-of-christopher-bookers-freezing-heat/" class="more-link">Read more of this story &#187;</a></p>
]]></description>
    <wfw:commentRss>http://ecoworldly.com/2008/11/17/the-bias-and-logical-fallacies-of-christopher-bookers-freezing-heat/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
  </item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- 95 queries in 0.304 seconds. -->