<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
  xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
  xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
  >

<channel>
  <title>Green Options &#187; clear cut</title>
  <link>http://greenoptions.com/tag/clear-cut</link>
  <description>Posts tagged 'clear cut'</description>
  <pubDate>Mon, 05 Jan 2009 21:22:06 +0000</pubDate>
  <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
  <language>en</language>
  <item>
    <title>Conservationists to Buy Old Growth Forests in Washington</title>
    <link>http://planetsave.com/blog/2009/01/05/conservationists-to-buy-old-growth-forests-in-washington/</link>
    <comments>http://planetsave.com/blog/2009/01/05/conservationists-to-buy-old-growth-forests-in-washington/#comments</comments>
    <pubDate>Mon, 05 Jan 2009 21:22:06 +0000</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Michael A. Weber</dc:creator>
    
		<category><![CDATA[Action &amp; Activism]]></category>

    <guid isPermaLink="false">http://planetsave.com/blog/2009/01/05/conservationists-to-buy-old-growth-forests-in-washington/</guid>
    <description><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://planetsave.com/files/2009/01/forest.jpg"><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-3677" src="http://go635254.s3.amazonaws.com/planetsave/files/2009/01/forest.jpg" alt="" width="500" height="375" /></a></p>
<p><strong>If all goes as planned, conservation groups such as the <a href="http://seattletimes.nwsource.com/html/localnews/2008590169_clearcut05m.html">Sierra Club will be buying 3,000 acres of land</a> that was previously set for a clearcut. The parcels, located in Washington&#8217;s Skykomish Valley, include ecologically sensitive old growth forests and provide the scenic view that the neighboring areas are known for having.</strong></p>
<p>Charlies Raines of the Sierra Club, who is spearheading the project, insists that the trees in these parcels are &#8220;not even high-value&#8221; for logging companies. On top of being valuable for the environment, they might bring in more money as trees than they would as lumber and paper.</p>
<p><a href="http://planetsave.com/blog/2009/01/05/conservationists-to-buy-old-growth-forests-in-washington/" class="more-link">Read more of this story &#187;</a></p>
]]></description>
    <wfw:commentRss>http://planetsave.com/blog/2009/01/05/conservationists-to-buy-old-growth-forests-in-washington/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>Clear-Cutting Greenhouse Gas Emissions Must be Avoided or Mitigated Under CEQA</title>
    <link>http://ecoscraps.com/2008/12/26/clear-cutting-greenhouse-gas-emissions-must-be-avoided-or-mitigated-under-ceqa/</link>
    <comments>http://ecoscraps.com/2008/12/26/clear-cutting-greenhouse-gas-emissions-must-be-avoided-or-mitigated-under-ceqa/#comments</comments>
    <pubDate>Fri, 26 Dec 2008 19:21:25 +0000</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Jennifer Lance</dc:creator>
    
		<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Climate Change]]></category>

    <guid isPermaLink="false">http://ecoscraps.com/2008/12/26/clear-cutting-greenhouse-gas-emissions-must-be-avoided-or-mitigated-under-ceqa/</guid>
    <description><![CDATA[<h3><a href="http://go635254.s3.amazonaws.com/ecoscraps/files/2008/12/loggingtruck.jpg"><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-1061" src="http://go635254.s3.amazonaws.com/ecoscraps/files/2008/12/loggingtruck.jpg" alt="logging practices must mitigate for greenhouse emissions" width="500" height="333" /></a>All timber harvest plans (THP) in California must comply with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA); however, logging companies and the state have largely ignored the enormous increase in global warming emissions caused by clear-cut logging practices.</h3>
<p>CEQA requires greenhouse gas emissions resulting from a project to be quantified, as well as, THPs must identify ways to avoid or mitigate the emissions. According to the<a href="http://www.biologicaldiversity.org/news/press_releases/2008/logging-emissions-12-18-2008.html" target="_blank"> Center for Biological Diversity</a>, the conservation group calling for the greenhouse gas requirements of CEQA to be followed:</p>
<blockquote><p>Requests to clear-cut thousands of acres of California’s forests are currently before the state Department of Forestry . For example, the Swamped Timber Harvest Plan would alone clear-cut 424 acres. None of the requests address carbon emissions, however, as required by CEQA. <strong>This is an especially serious problem given that the published science shows that clear-cutting can remove more carbon from the forest than any other disturbance, including fire</strong>.</p></blockquote>
]]></description>
    <wfw:commentRss>http://ecoscraps.com/2008/12/26/clear-cutting-greenhouse-gas-emissions-must-be-avoided-or-mitigated-under-ceqa/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
  </item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- 127 queries in 0.364 seconds. -->