<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
  xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
  xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
  >

<channel>
  <title>Green Options &#187; coal industry</title>
  <link>http://greenoptions.com/tag/coal-industry</link>
  <description>Posts tagged 'coal industry'</description>
  <pubDate>Sun, 25 Oct 2009 18:59:31 +0000</pubDate>
  <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
  <language>en</language>
  <item>
    <title>10 Practical Suggestions for How a Polluting Company Can Easily Reduce its Greenhouse Gases</title>
    <link>http://cleantechnica.com/2009/10/25/10-practical-suggestions-for-how-a-polluting-company-can-easily-reduce-its-greenhouse-gases/</link>
    <comments>http://cleantechnica.com/2009/10/25/10-practical-suggestions-for-how-a-polluting-company-can-easily-reduce-its-greenhouse-gases/#comments</comments>
    <pubDate>Sun, 25 Oct 2009 18:59:31 +0000</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Susan Kraemer</dc:creator>
    
		<category><![CDATA[alternative energy]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[carbon emissions]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[energy efficiency]]></category>

    <guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/2009/10/25/10-practical-suggestions-for-how-a-polluting-company-can-easily-reduce-its-greenhouse-gases/</guid>
    <description><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://cleantechnica.com/files/2009/10/coal1.jpg"><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-3806" src="http://go635254.s3.amazonaws.com/cleantechnica/files/2009/10/coal1.jpg" alt="" width="486" height="390" /></a>Chances are, if you run a major polluting company, you&#8217;re not reading cleantechnica. But you never know. So here&#8217;s my advice, based on my experience writing about energy; gathered into one easy quick read for the non-eco reader, on how a polluting company can benefit from the new energy bill requirements to cut carbon emissions.</p>
<p><a href="http://cleantechnica.com/2009/10/25/10-practical-suggestions-for-how-a-polluting-company-can-easily-reduce-its-greenhouse-gases/" class="more-link">Read more of this story &#187;</a></p>
]]></description>
    <wfw:commentRss>http://cleantechnica.com/2009/10/25/10-practical-suggestions-for-how-a-polluting-company-can-easily-reduce-its-greenhouse-gases/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>Environmental Defense Fund: Global Warming by the Numbers - 13 Scary Facts</title>
    <link>http://sustainablog.org/2009/02/13/environmental-defense-fund-global-warming-by-the-numbers-13-scary-facts/</link>
    <comments>http://sustainablog.org/2009/02/13/environmental-defense-fund-global-warming-by-the-numbers-13-scary-facts/#comments</comments>
    <pubDate>Fri, 13 Feb 2009 18:38:10 +0000</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>edfblog</dc:creator>
    
		<category><![CDATA[Climate change]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Environmental &amp; Climate Science]]></category>

    <guid isPermaLink="false">http://sustainablog.org/2009/02/13/environmental-defense-fund-global-warming-by-the-numbers-13-scary-facts/</guid>
    <description><![CDATA[<h3><a href="http://sustainablog.org/files/2009/02/polar_bear_mom_cub_lindblad.jpg"><img class="alignleft size-full wp-image-4180" src="http://sustainablog.org/files/2009/02/polar_bear_mom_cub_lindblad.jpg" alt="credit Lindblad Expeditions/ Ralph Lee Hopkins" width="225" height="149" /></a>Friday the 13th just got a little scarier. Here are 13 facts about the realities of global warming.</h3>
<p>The numbers speak for themselves — we must make 2009 the showdown year for global warming action. There is no time to lose.</p>
<h3 class="byTheNumbers">35%</h3>
<p>Increase in the global carbon dioxide emissions from the burning of fossil fuels since the Kyoto Protocol was signed in 1992.</p>
<h3 class="byTheNumbers">388.57 ppm</h3>
<p>Average concentration of carbon dioxide in the atmosphere in May 2008, a record high.</p>
<h3 class="byTheNumbers">541 – 970 ppm</h3>
<p>The projected concentration of carbon dioxide in the atmosphere by 2100 under a business as usual scenario where we don&#8217;t dramatically reduce global warming emissions.</p>
<h3 class="byTheNumbers">260 – 280 ppm</h3>
<p>Average concentration of carbon dioxide in the atmosphere before industrial emissions.</p>
<p><a href="http://sustainablog.org/2009/02/13/environmental-defense-fund-global-warming-by-the-numbers-13-scary-facts/" class="more-link">Read more of this story &#187;</a></p>
]]></description>
    <wfw:commentRss>http://sustainablog.org/2009/02/13/environmental-defense-fund-global-warming-by-the-numbers-13-scary-facts/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>Coal Lobby Co-Opts Obama Message in New Ad</title>
    <link>http://redgreenandblue.org/2009/01/26/coal-lobby-co-opts-obama-message-in-new-ad/</link>
    <comments>http://redgreenandblue.org/2009/01/26/coal-lobby-co-opts-obama-message-in-new-ad/#comments</comments>
    <pubDate>Tue, 27 Jan 2009 03:16:58 +0000</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Timothy B. Hurst</dc:creator>
    
		<category><![CDATA[Energy]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Leader]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Liberal]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[U.S.]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Video]]></category>

    <guid isPermaLink="false">http://redgreenandblue.org/2009/01/26/coal-lobby-co-opts-obama-message-in-new-ad/</guid>
    <description><![CDATA[<p>You don&#8217;t see commercials for biotech companies that do stem-cell research do it. You&#8217;re not seeing wind turbine manufacturers buying ad-time and doing it. So why is it that the &#8220;clean coal&#8221; industry group running primetime television commercials taking soundbites and snippets from what Pres. Obama has said about coal. Yes, during his campaign, Mr. Obama did say he would look for ways to burn coal cleanly, but the key here is  that the coal lobby wants you to think that such technology already exists - and it most certainly does not.</p>
<p style="text-align: center">This post contains additional media. <a href="http://redgreenandblue.org/2009/01/26/coal-lobby-co-opts-obama-message-in-new-ad/">Click here to view the full post</a>.</p>
]]></description>
    <wfw:commentRss>http://redgreenandblue.org/2009/01/26/coal-lobby-co-opts-obama-message-in-new-ad/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>Coal Is Not the Answer: Sierra Club Launches Coal-Debunking Campaign</title>
    <link>http://redgreenandblue.org/2008/10/23/coal-is-not-the-answer-sierra-club-launches-coal-debunking-campaign/</link>
    <comments>http://redgreenandblue.org/2008/10/23/coal-is-not-the-answer-sierra-club-launches-coal-debunking-campaign/#comments</comments>
    <pubDate>Thu, 23 Oct 2008 17:16:47 +0000</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Timothy B. Hurst</dc:creator>
    
		<category><![CDATA[Climate Change]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Energy]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Leader]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Liberal]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Policy]]></category>

    <guid isPermaLink="false">http://redgreenandblue.org/2008/10/23/coal-is-not-the-answer-sierra-club-launches-coal-debunking-campaign/</guid>
    <description><![CDATA[<h3><a href="http://redgreenandblue.org/files/2008/10/coalhand.jpg"><img class="alignleft alignnone size-medium wp-image-1403" style="float: left;margin-left: 2px;margin-right: 2px" src="http://go635254.s3.amazonaws.com/redgreenandblue/files/2008/10/coalhand.jpg" alt="lump of coal in two hands" width="149" height="199" /></a>Pushes back against coal industry PR blitz</h3>
<p>You would have to live under a rock to have missed the massive media campaign coal industry groups have been waging over the last year or two. The language and symbols of clean coal now fill the airways on radio and TV; they appear on <a href="http://ecoscraps.com/2008/09/28/what-does-pennsylvania-know-about-clean-coal-that-no-one-else-does/">billboards</a>, in talking points and even on websites like this one. The <a href="http://www.heatisonline.org/contentserver/objecthandlers/index.cfm?ID=7068&#38;Method=Full">coal lobby has spent</a> hundreds of millions of dollars this year alone trying to convince politicians and the people who elect them that coal is now or will soon be &#8220;clean.&#8221;</p>
<p>Big coal&#8217;s presence throughout this long election season as a major sponsor of the presidential debates from <a href="http://thinkprogress.org/2007/11/15/clean-coal-sponsors-debate/">November 2007</a> to <a href="http://www.alternet.org/blogs/mediaculture/69154/coal_industry_sponsored_last_night%E2%80%99s_cnn_youtube_gop_presidential_debate/">October 2008</a> stands in striking opposition to the absence of any substantive political discussions about climate change in the debates themselves.</p>
<p>But not everyone is buying it. As Kevin Grandia at DeSmogBlog <a href="http://www.desmogblog.com/coal-is-not-the-answer">points out</a>, the Sierra Club just launched a PR push of their own, arguing that <a href="http://www.coalisnottheanswer.org/">coal is not the answer</a>. Here&#8217;s a little slice of the 116 year-old organization&#8217;s new debunking strategy.
<p><a href="http://redgreenandblue.org/2008/10/23/coal-is-not-the-answer-sierra-club-launches-coal-debunking-campaign/" class="more-link">Read more of this story &#187;</a></p>
]]></description>
    <wfw:commentRss>http://redgreenandblue.org/2008/10/23/coal-is-not-the-answer-sierra-club-launches-coal-debunking-campaign/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
  </item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- 188 queries in 0.784 seconds. -->