<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
  xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
  xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
  >

<channel>
  <title>Green Options &#187; coal to liquid</title>
  <link>http://greenoptions.com/tag/coal-to-liquid</link>
  <description>Posts tagged 'coal to liquid'</description>
  <pubDate>Tue, 16 Sep 2008 00:14:23 +0000</pubDate>
  <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
  <language>en</language>
  <item>
    <title>Oil Industry Complains about Gang-of-20 Compromise</title>
    <link>http://redgreenandblue.org/2008/09/15/oil-industry-complains-about-gang-of-20-compromise/</link>
    <comments>http://redgreenandblue.org/2008/09/15/oil-industry-complains-about-gang-of-20-compromise/#comments</comments>
    <pubDate>Tue, 16 Sep 2008 00:14:23 +0000</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Dana Nuccitelli</dc:creator>
    
		<category><![CDATA[Center]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Climate Change]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Energy]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Leader]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Policy]]></category>

    <guid isPermaLink="false">http://redgreenandblue.org/2008/09/15/oil-industry-complains-about-gang-of-20-compromise/</guid>
    <description><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://redgreenandblue.org/files/2008/09/offshore-wind.jpg"><img class="alignleft size-medium wp-image-990" style="float: left" src="http://go635254.s3.amazonaws.com/redgreenandblue/files/2008/09/offshore-wind.jpg" alt="offshore wind" width="227" height="146" /></a><strong>The former Gang-of-10 compromise, which has since expanded to 16 and then 20 US Senators, proposes to swap limited offshore drilling for an increase in renewable energy support.</strong></p>
<p style="text-align: center">
<p>The Gang-of-20 bill severely limits offshore drilling to a handful of Southeastern states that must opt in to allow increased drilling, and moves the drilling boundary to 100 miles offshore (from its current 200 miles) “with states given the option to set it at 50 miles.”</p>
<p>Some oil industry representatives question the effect of the proposals, citing federal studies that show that more than 80% of known oil reserves are inside the 50-mile limit and therefore unavailable. Very little is known about oil reserves beyond 100 miles. Waters off almost the entire Pacific coast — where all three governors oppose drilling at the 50-mile barrier — is considered too deep for drilling 100 miles offshore.</p>
<p><a href="http://redgreenandblue.org/2008/09/15/oil-industry-complains-about-gang-of-20-compromise/" class="more-link">Read more of this story &#187;</a></p>
]]></description>
    <wfw:commentRss>http://redgreenandblue.org/2008/09/15/oil-industry-complains-about-gang-of-20-compromise/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>Think Clean Coal is Dirty? DARPA Says You&#8217;re Wrong!</title>
    <link>http://planetsave.com/blog/2008/09/15/think-clean-coal-is-dirty-darpa-says-youre-wrong/</link>
    <comments>http://planetsave.com/blog/2008/09/15/think-clean-coal-is-dirty-darpa-says-youre-wrong/#comments</comments>
    <pubDate>Mon, 15 Sep 2008 23:34:10 +0000</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Jerry James Stone</dc:creator>
    
		<category><![CDATA[Action &amp; Activism]]></category>

    <guid isPermaLink="false">http://planetsave.com/blog/2008/09/15/think-clean-coal-is-dirty-darpa-says-youre-wrong/</guid>
    <description><![CDATA[<p><img class="alignleft" style="margin: 5px;float: left" src="http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2120/2202893112_3890b7bd69.jpg" alt="" width="411" height="274" />The US Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency - aka DARPA - has set its Big Brother eye on &#8220;clean coal&#8221; for airplane fuel. It&#8217;s unveiling a program to demonstrate both the economical, and environmentally friendly, conversion of coal-to-liquid (CTL) fuels.</p>
<p>According to <a href="http://www.aviationweek.com/aw/generic/story_channel.jsp?channel=defense&#38;id=news/COAL09128.xml">Aviation Week</a>, DARPA has issued a broad agency announcement (BAA) soliciting research proposals and plans to award 12-month contracts totaling $4.56 million to demonstrate the feasibility of alternative CTL technologies. Already <a href="http://gas2.org/2008/03/29/first-algae-biodiesel-plant-goes-online-april-1-2008/comment-page-5/">investigating bio-fuels</a>, the agency says its CTL program is intended to demonstrate processes that could meet Defense Department demand for JP-8 jet fuel from U.S. coal reserves at a cost-competitive price compared with petroleum-based fuels.</p>
<blockquote><p>DARPA says existing direct and indirect coal liquefaction processes are &#8220;extremely expensive to implement, consume large amounts of water and produce unacceptable amounts of atmospheric carbon dioxide (CO2) and other pollutants.&#8221;</p></blockquote>
<p>DARPA is aiming for a $1.5 billion plant that will make 100,000 barrels of fuel per day where each kilogram of coal converted uses only 0.5 kg. of water. Currently, each kilogram of coal converted uses about a kilogram of water and produces 1.3 kg of CO2 and 0.27 kg of oil, says DARPA. In fact, fuels from coal produce 80 percent more CO2 than petroleum-based fuel, but DARPA believes CTL concepts may exist that avoid the production of CO2. The need for water as a source of hydrogen is also an issue with existing methods.</p>
<p>It seems like flying less might also be a good option - 100,000 barrels a day!</p>
<p>Image source: <a title="Link to James Gordon's photostream" href="http://flickr.com/photos/jamesdale10/2202893112/"><strong>James Gordon</strong></a> on <strong><a href="http://flickr.com/">Flickr</a></strong></p>
]]></description>
    <wfw:commentRss>http://planetsave.com/blog/2008/09/15/think-clean-coal-is-dirty-darpa-says-youre-wrong/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>Puroleum - liquid coal made in America by Bonne Posma</title>
    <link>http://redgreenandblue.org/2008/06/02/puroleum-liquid-coal-made-in-america-by-bonne-posma/</link>
    <comments>http://redgreenandblue.org/2008/06/02/puroleum-liquid-coal-made-in-america-by-bonne-posma/#comments</comments>
    <pubDate>Mon, 02 Jun 2008 09:08:36 +0000</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Rod Adams</dc:creator>
    
		<category><![CDATA[Energy]]></category>

    <guid isPermaLink="false">http://redgreenandblue.org/2008/06/02/puroleum-liquid-coal-made-in-america-by-bonne-posma/</guid>
    <description><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://redgreenandblue.org/files/2008/06/puroleum.jpg" title="Puroleum - a product of Liquid Coal"><img src="http://go635254.s3.amazonaws.com/redgreenandblue/files/2008/06/puroleum.jpg" alt="Puroleum - a product of Liquid Coal" height="539" width="407" /></a></p>
<p>Last night I had the opportunity to talk with Bonne Posma, a serial entrepreneur whose most recent company is called <a href="http://liquidcoal.com">Liquid Coal, Inc.</a> He sees a great opportunity for making the world a safer and cleaner place by developing a process that will use heat from high temperature nuclear reactors as part of a process of converting coal into a liquid hydrocarbon.</p>
<p>Bonne is standing on the shoulders of many other engineers and scientists in his efforts. The chemistry required to convert coal, which is mostly carbon and hydrogen, into a liquid hydrocarbon was developed in the 1920s by a German team of Franz Fischer and Hans Tropsch. The Fisher-Tropsch process has a rather uncomfortable history - it&#8217;s most prominent use has been by Germany during WWII and by South Africa during the apartheid era.</p>
<p><a href="http://redgreenandblue.org/2008/06/02/puroleum-liquid-coal-made-in-america-by-bonne-posma/" class="more-link">Read more of this story &#187;</a></p>
]]></description>
    <wfw:commentRss>http://redgreenandblue.org/2008/06/02/puroleum-liquid-coal-made-in-america-by-bonne-posma/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>Human and Industrial Waste Converted to Energy</title>
    <link>http://planetsave.com/blog/2008/01/09/human-and-industrial-waste-converted-to-energy/</link>
    <comments>http://planetsave.com/blog/2008/01/09/human-and-industrial-waste-converted-to-energy/#comments</comments>
    <pubDate>Wed, 09 Jan 2008 08:33:39 +0000</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Max Lindberg</dc:creator>
    
		<category><![CDATA[Other Green Topics]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

    <guid isPermaLink="false">http://planetsave.com/blog/2008/01/09/human-and-industrial-waste-converted-to-energy/</guid>
    <description><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://planetsave.com/files/2008/01/enertech-article.jpg" title="enertech-article.jpg"><img src="http://go635254.s3.amazonaws.com/planetsave/files/2008/01/enertech-article.jpg" alt="enertech-article.jpg" /></a></p>
<p>An Atlanta-based company is betting on a sustainable, unending supply of raw material as feed stock, to create a  renewable energy source.  Human and industrial wastes will soon be processed into a solid, called &#8220;E-Fuel&#8221;, a replacement for coal or other fossil fuels.</p>
<p>The company, <a href="http://www.enertech.com/">EnerTech Environmental</a>, says it has received $42 million in funding to continue engineering and completion of a commercial-size plant in Rialto, CA, shown in the picture.  Four more plants are in the planning stage as funding for the projects is received.  The company says it now has $57 million in venture capital.
<p><a href="http://planetsave.com/blog/2008/01/09/human-and-industrial-waste-converted-to-energy/" class="more-link">Read more of this story &#187;</a></p>
]]></description>
    <wfw:commentRss>http://planetsave.com/blog/2008/01/09/human-and-industrial-waste-converted-to-energy/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>Coal-to-Liquid, A Company&#8217;s Pitch</title>
    <link>http://planetsave.com/blog/2008/01/09/coal-to-liquid-a-companys-pitch/</link>
    <comments>http://planetsave.com/blog/2008/01/09/coal-to-liquid-a-companys-pitch/#comments</comments>
    <pubDate>Wed, 09 Jan 2008 07:18:19 +0000</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Max Lindberg</dc:creator>
    
		<category><![CDATA[Other Green Topics]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

    <guid isPermaLink="false">http://planetsave.com/blog/2008/01/09/coal-to-liquid-a-companys-pitch/</guid>
    <description><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://planetsave.com/files/2008/01/coal-barge1.jpg" title="coal-barge1.jpg"><img src="http://go635254.s3.amazonaws.com/planetsave/files/2008/01/coal-barge1.jpg" alt="coal-barge1.jpg" /></a>A Canadian company has used the current presidential race to plug it&#8217;s coal-to-liquid process.  Citing positive statements by presidential hopefuls, Barack Obama, Hillary Clinton and Mike Huckabee, <a href="http://www.silveradogreenfuel.com/">Silverado Green Fuel</a> has posted a video on it&#8217;s front page, explaining the process of turning low-grade coal into a clean-burning, non-polluting product.</p>
<p>The Vancouver, BC firm claims their initial production costs will come in at $15 per barrel, on an oil equivalent energy basis.  Not bad, they say, considering oil is hanging in there at $90 plus a barrel.
<p><a href="http://planetsave.com/blog/2008/01/09/coal-to-liquid-a-companys-pitch/" class="more-link">Read more of this story &#187;</a></p>
]]></description>
    <wfw:commentRss>http://planetsave.com/blog/2008/01/09/coal-to-liquid-a-companys-pitch/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
  </item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- 219 queries in 0.582 seconds. -->