<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
  xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
  xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
  >

<channel>
  <title>Green Options &#187; coatings</title>
  <link>http://greenoptions.com/tag/coatings</link>
  <description>Posts tagged 'coatings'</description>
  <pubDate>Thu, 16 Jul 2009 00:22:17 +0000</pubDate>
  <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
  <language>en</language>
  <item>
    <title>The Latest Medical Innovation: Recycled TVs</title>
    <link>http://inspiredeconomist.com/2009/07/16/recycled-tvs/</link>
    <comments>http://inspiredeconomist.com/2009/07/16/recycled-tvs/#comments</comments>
    <pubDate>Thu, 16 Jul 2009 00:22:17 +0000</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Lisa Wojnovich</dc:creator>
    
		<category><![CDATA[Conservation]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Recycling]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Unique Ideas]]></category>

    <guid isPermaLink="false">http://inspiredeconomist.com/2009/07/16/recycled-tvs/</guid>
    <description><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.york.ac.uk/news-and-events/news/2009/medical-waste-lcd/" target="_blank"><img class="alignright size-full wp-image-1550" src="http://go635254.s3.amazonaws.com/inspiredeconomist/files/2009/07/e-waste.jpg" alt="E-Waste" width="240" height="180" /><br />
<h4>Researchers at the University of York</a> have recently come up with a method of recycling that seems like it fell from the pages of a science fiction novel. They want to turn discarded television screens into components for biomedicine.</h4>
<p><a href="http://inspiredeconomist.com/2009/07/16/recycled-tvs/" class="more-link">Read more of this story &#187;</a></p>
]]></description>
    <wfw:commentRss>http://inspiredeconomist.com/2009/07/16/recycled-tvs/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>Giving Crafts a Fresh Coat of Milk Paint</title>
    <link>http://craftingagreenworld.com/2008/07/02/giving-crafts-a-fresh-coat-of-milk-paint/</link>
    <comments>http://craftingagreenworld.com/2008/07/02/giving-crafts-a-fresh-coat-of-milk-paint/#comments</comments>
    <pubDate>Wed, 02 Jul 2008 21:15:17 +0000</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Autumn Wiggins</dc:creator>
    
		<category><![CDATA[Tools &amp; Supplies]]></category>

    <guid isPermaLink="false">http://craftingagreenworld.com/2008/07/02/giving-crafts-a-fresh-coat-of-milk-paint/</guid>
    <description><![CDATA[<p><img class="alignleft" style="float: left" src="http://go635254.s3.amazonaws.com/craftingagreenworld/files/2008/07/milk.jpg" alt="" width="250" />Mooove over acrylics, <a href="http://www.milkpaint.com/about_history.html" target="_blank">milk paint</a> is back. In recent years, this medium has been popular for historical furniture reproduction, and even as a natural alternative to latex for interior walls, but have you considered using it for your latest DIY creation?</p>
<p>Found in everything from cave paintings to King Tut&#8217;s tomb, this handmade substance was a predominate component in decorative art for at least a few millenia, until the industrial revolution came along. Casein, the protein found in milk, makes an extremely durable binder for pigments to adhere to most porous surfaces. The rustic finish is not usually desirable for fine art, and it fell out of favor all together with the advent of convenient, but far more volatile, canned paint.</p>
<p>High demand in the home improvement market for water-based <a href="http://www.eartheasy.com/live_nontoxic_paints.htm" target="_blank">low or no VOC coatings</a> has brought eco-friendly technology to mainstream retail stores, but I have yet to see it available in the small sizes that artists and crafters lean towards.
<p><a href="http://craftingagreenworld.com/2008/07/02/giving-crafts-a-fresh-coat-of-milk-paint/" class="more-link">Read more of this story &#187;</a></p>
]]></description>
    <wfw:commentRss>http://craftingagreenworld.com/2008/07/02/giving-crafts-a-fresh-coat-of-milk-paint/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>Greenpeace vs. Greenpeace</title>
    <link>http://planetsave.com/blog/2008/04/26/greenpeace-vs-greenpeace/</link>
    <comments>http://planetsave.com/blog/2008/04/26/greenpeace-vs-greenpeace/#comments</comments>
    <pubDate>Sat, 26 Apr 2008 04:37:24 +0000</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Joshua S Hill</dc:creator>
    
		<category><![CDATA[Action &amp; Activism]]></category>

    <guid isPermaLink="false">http://planetsave.com/blog/2008/04/26/greenpeace-vs-greenpeace/</guid>
    <description><![CDATA[<p><a title="Chernobyl_Disaster" href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/25263738@N02/2442522470/"><img alt="Chernobyl_Disaster" src="http://static.flickr.com/2035/2442522470_32969cc467_m.jpg" align="left"/></a>Oh it’s a very happy day when you get to see a conflict like this one arise. And though it isn’t necessarily new, it’s oh so very entertaining. Greenpeace founder Patrick Moore was quoted at a chamber breakfast in Idaho Falls and the Idaho Environmental Forum in Boise this past week, as saying that the world needs to turn to nuclear power.  </p>
<p>Conversely, a day later, Greenpeace published a piece on their website eviscerating nuclear power.  </p>
<p>Oh let the fun begin! </p>
<p><a href="http://planetsave.com/blog/2008/04/26/greenpeace-vs-greenpeace/" class="more-link">Read more of this story &#187;</a></p>
]]></description>
    <wfw:commentRss>http://planetsave.com/blog/2008/04/26/greenpeace-vs-greenpeace/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
  </item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- 161 queries in 0.427 seconds. -->