<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
  xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
  xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
  >

<channel>
  <title>Green Options &#187; concentrated solar</title>
  <link>http://greenoptions.com/tag/concentrated-solar</link>
  <description>Posts tagged 'concentrated solar'</description>
  <pubDate>Fri, 29 May 2009 02:23:54 +0000</pubDate>
  <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
  <language>en</language>
  <item>
    <title>Concentrated Solar Power Could Generate 25% of the World&#8217;s Electricity by 2050</title>
    <link>http://cleantechnica.com/2009/05/29/concentrated-solar-power-could-generate-25-of-the-worlds-electricity-by-2050/</link>
    <comments>http://cleantechnica.com/2009/05/29/concentrated-solar-power-could-generate-25-of-the-worlds-electricity-by-2050/#comments</comments>
    <pubDate>Fri, 29 May 2009 02:23:54 +0000</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Ariel Schwartz</dc:creator>
    
		<category><![CDATA[alternative energy]]></category>

    <guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/2009/05/29/concentrated-solar-power-could-generate-25-of-the-worlds-electricity-by-2050/</guid>
    <description><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://cleantechnica.com/files/2009/05/csp2.jpg"><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-2603" src="http://go635254.s3.amazonaws.com/cleantechnica/files/2009/05/csp2.jpg" alt="" width="500" height="332" /></a></p>
<p>A <a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/environment/2009/may/26/solarpower-renewableenergy">new study</a> from Greenpeace, the European Solar Thermal Agency, and the International Energy Agency&#8217;s SolarPACES Group has shown that concentrated solar power (CSP) could generate a quarter of the world&#8217;s energy needs by 2050&#8211;and create thousands of new jobs and prevent millions of tons of CO2 from being released.</p>
<p><a href="http://cleantechnica.com/2009/05/29/concentrated-solar-power-could-generate-25-of-the-worlds-electricity-by-2050/" class="more-link">Read more of this story &#187;</a></p>
]]></description>
    <wfw:commentRss>http://cleantechnica.com/2009/05/29/concentrated-solar-power-could-generate-25-of-the-worlds-electricity-by-2050/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>SolFocus Installing World&#8217;s Largest Concentrated Solar Project in Spain</title>
    <link>http://cleantechnica.com/2008/11/03/solfocus-installing-worlds-largest-concentrated-solar-project-in-spain/</link>
    <comments>http://cleantechnica.com/2008/11/03/solfocus-installing-worlds-largest-concentrated-solar-project-in-spain/#comments</comments>
    <pubDate>Tue, 04 Nov 2008 00:55:59 +0000</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Ariel Schwartz</dc:creator>
    
		<category><![CDATA[solar energy]]></category>

    <guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/2008/11/03/solfocus-installing-worlds-largest-concentrated-solar-project-in-spain/</guid>
    <description><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://cleantechnica.com/files/2008/11/puertollano-200kw-low.jpg"><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-1422" src="http://go635254.s3.amazonaws.com/cleantechnica/files/2008/11/puertollano-200kw-low.jpg" alt="cpv" width="500" height="222" /></a></p>
<p>Earlier today, concentrated solar company <a href="http://www.solfocus.com/">SolFocus</a> <a href="http://www.greentechmedia.com/articles/solfocus-to-install-worlds-largest-concentrating-pv-project-5103.html">announced </a>that it has signed a deal to install over 10 MW of its systems in Spain for EMPE Solar. Upon its completion in 2010, the <a href="http://www.solfocus.com/news_file/20081103144613_solfocus-and-empe-solar-sign-deal.pdf">$103 million, multi-site project</a> will be the largest concentrated solar deployment in the world. SolFocus estimates that the project will be able to meet the domestic energy requirements of 40,000 homes.</p>
<p><a href="http://cleantechnica.com/2008/11/03/solfocus-installing-worlds-largest-concentrated-solar-project-in-spain/" class="more-link">Read more of this story &#187;</a></p>
]]></description>
    <wfw:commentRss>http://cleantechnica.com/2008/11/03/solfocus-installing-worlds-largest-concentrated-solar-project-in-spain/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>Morgan Solar: Simple, Cheap, and Efficient Concentrated Solar Tech, Part 2</title>
    <link>http://cleantechnica.com/2008/09/17/morgan-solar-simple-cheap-and-efficient-concentrated-solar-power-part-2/</link>
    <comments>http://cleantechnica.com/2008/09/17/morgan-solar-simple-cheap-and-efficient-concentrated-solar-power-part-2/#comments</comments>
    <pubDate>Thu, 18 Sep 2008 01:06:33 +0000</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Ariel Schwartz</dc:creator>
    
		<category><![CDATA[solar energy]]></category>

    <guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/2008/09/17/morgan-solar-simple-cheap-and-efficient-concentrated-solar-power-part-2/</guid>
    <description><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://cleantechnica.com/files/2008/09/simbalandscapelarge.jpg"><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-1110" src="http://go635254.s3.amazonaws.com/cleantechnica/files/2008/09/simbalandscapelarge.jpg" alt="sun simba" width="500" height="377" /></a></p>
<p>A few weeks ago, I posted a brief introduction to <a href="http://cleantechnica.com/2008/09/04/new-concentrated-solar-tech-simple-cheap-and-efficient/">Morgan Solar</a>, a Toronto-based start-up that has invented a new method for building simple and cheap solar concentrators. Many of you asked for more details, so I asked Nicolas Morgan, the company&#8217;s Director of Business Development, some in-depth questions about Morgan Solar.</p>
<p><a href="http://cleantechnica.com/2008/09/17/morgan-solar-simple-cheap-and-efficient-concentrated-solar-power-part-2/" class="more-link">Read more of this story &#187;</a></p>
]]></description>
    <wfw:commentRss>http://cleantechnica.com/2008/09/17/morgan-solar-simple-cheap-and-efficient-concentrated-solar-power-part-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>McCain&#8217;s Nuclear Energy Plan May Cost $315 Billion</title>
    <link>http://redgreenandblue.org/2008/09/11/mccains-nuclear-energy-plan-may-cost-315-billion/</link>
    <comments>http://redgreenandblue.org/2008/09/11/mccains-nuclear-energy-plan-may-cost-315-billion/#comments</comments>
    <pubDate>Fri, 12 Sep 2008 01:11:33 +0000</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Dana Nuccitelli</dc:creator>
    
		<category><![CDATA[Center]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Choice]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Energy]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[US Election]]></category>

    <guid isPermaLink="false">http://redgreenandblue.org/2008/09/11/mccains-nuclear-energy-plan-may-cost-315-billion/</guid>
    <description><![CDATA[<p><strong>According to a Bloomberg analysis, John McCain&#8217;s plan to revive the U.S. nuclear power industry with 45 new reactors may cost $315 billion, with taxpayers bearing much of the financial risk. </strong></p>
<p style="text-align: center"><img class="aligncenter" style="vertical-align: top" src="http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/4/4e/Nuclear_Power_Plant_Cattenom.jpg" alt="nuclear plants" width="500" height="300" /></p>
<p>The Republican presidential nominee expects a 29% increase in electricity demand by 2030, and wants 45 new nuclear power plants built by then.  Industry estimates put their cost at $7 billion each.</p>
<p>The <a href="http://www.eia.doe.gov/oiaf/aeo/assumption/electricity.html" target="_blank">Energy Information Administration</a> estimated last year that adding nuclear power capacity would cost $2,143 a kilowatt (kW) before financing and inflation. That compared with $1,434 to $2,302 for clean-coal technologies.</p>
<p>Over the past year, the expense has more than doubled to $5,000 a kilowatt, or $7 billion for a typical reactor, utility filings and company statements show. The increase in part reflects rising prices for commodities such as steel and cement.</p>
<p><a href="http://redgreenandblue.org/2008/09/11/mccains-nuclear-energy-plan-may-cost-315-billion/" class="more-link">Read more of this story &#187;</a></p>
]]></description>
    <wfw:commentRss>http://redgreenandblue.org/2008/09/11/mccains-nuclear-energy-plan-may-cost-315-billion/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>New Concentrated Solar Tech: Simple, Cheap and Efficient</title>
    <link>http://cleantechnica.com/2008/09/04/new-concentrated-solar-tech-simple-cheap-and-efficient/</link>
    <comments>http://cleantechnica.com/2008/09/04/new-concentrated-solar-tech-simple-cheap-and-efficient/#comments</comments>
    <pubDate>Thu, 04 Sep 2008 19:41:44 +0000</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Ariel Schwartz</dc:creator>
    
		<category><![CDATA[alternative energy]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[solar energy]]></category>

    <guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/2008/09/04/new-concentrated-solar-tech-simple-cheap-and-efficient/</guid>
    <description><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://cleantechnica.com/files/2008/09/640243767_274eb7e5bd_m.jpg"><img class="alignleft size-medium wp-image-1014" src="http://go635254.s3.amazonaws.com/cleantechnica/files/2008/09/640243767_274eb7e5bd_m.jpg" alt="sun" width="240" height="161" /></a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.morgansolar.com/">Morgan Solar</a>, a Toronto-based company launched last summer, <a href="http://www.greentechmedia.com/articles/out-of-africa-new-concentrating-solar-tech-inspired-by-congo-stint-1346.html">believes</a> it has the answer to creating simple and cheap solar concentrators.</p>
<p>While other companies are working to make solar cheaper by using mirrors or lenses to magnify sunlight that is directed into solar cells, Morgan Solar takes a different approach. Their system uses a thin sheet of acrylic to concentrate sunlight <strong>750 times</strong>. The sunlight is directed to a tiny cell on the edge of the plastic, greatly reducing the amount of material needed.</p>
<p><a href="http://cleantechnica.com/2008/09/04/new-concentrated-solar-tech-simple-cheap-and-efficient/" class="more-link">Read more of this story &#187;</a></p>
]]></description>
    <wfw:commentRss>http://cleantechnica.com/2008/09/04/new-concentrated-solar-tech-simple-cheap-and-efficient/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
  </item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- 222 queries in 0.501 seconds. -->