<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
  xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
  xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
  >

<channel>
  <title>Green Options &#187; Congress</title>
  <link>http://greenoptions.com/tag/congress</link>
  <description>Posts tagged 'Congress'</description>
  <pubDate>Mon, 19 Oct 2009 16:45:58 +0000</pubDate>
  <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
  <language>en</language>
  <item>
    <title>Three-Wheelers Approved for DOE Funds</title>
    <link>http://gas2.org/2009/10/19/3-wheelers-approved-for-doe-funds/</link>
    <comments>http://gas2.org/2009/10/19/3-wheelers-approved-for-doe-funds/#comments</comments>
    <pubDate>Mon, 19 Oct 2009 16:45:58 +0000</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Jo Borras</dc:creator>
    
		<category><![CDATA[Auto industry]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Electric Cars (EVs)]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Policy]]></category>

    <guid isPermaLink="false">http://gas2.org/2009/10/19/3-wheelers-approved-for-doe-funds/</guid>
    <description><![CDATA[<p style="text-align: center"><img class="size-medium wp-image-3835 aligncenter" src="http://go635254.s3.amazonaws.com/gas2/files/2009/10/aptera_1-600x280.jpg" alt="Aptera 2e" width="500" height="230" /></p>

<p>Many manufacturers of high-mpg and electric vehicles have adopted a 3-wheeled layout for cost and weight savings, and—in some cases—<a href="http://gas2.org/2008/09/15/do-cars-really-need-to-look-like-ufos-to-save-gas/" target="_blank">aerodynamic efficiency</a>. In most states, however, these vehicles are classified as motorcycles. That motorcycle moniker has made them ineligible for DOE funds set aside to foster innovation among American automakers&#8230; until now!</p>
<p>More details, after the jump.</p>
<p><a href="http://gas2.org/2009/10/19/3-wheelers-approved-for-doe-funds/" class="more-link">Read more of this story &#187;</a></p>
]]></description>
    <wfw:commentRss>http://gas2.org/2009/10/19/3-wheelers-approved-for-doe-funds/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>Nike Opposes US Chamber of Commerce &#38; Leaves Board, over Climate Change</title>
    <link>http://ecoworldly.com/2009/10/04/nike-opposes-us-chamber-of-commerce-leaves-board-climate-change/</link>
    <comments>http://ecoworldly.com/2009/10/04/nike-opposes-us-chamber-of-commerce-leaves-board-climate-change/#comments</comments>
    <pubDate>Sun, 04 Oct 2009 11:51:05 +0000</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Zachary Shahan</dc:creator>
    
		<category><![CDATA[About Climate]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[About Politics]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[In The Americas]]></category>

    <guid isPermaLink="false">http://ecoworldly.com/2009/10/04/nike-opposes-us-chamber-of-commerce-leaves-board-climate-change/</guid>
    <description><![CDATA[<p><a href='http://ecoworldly.com/files/2009/10/nike.jpg'><img src="http://go635254.s3.amazonaws.com/ecoworldly/files/2009/10/nike.jpg" alt="" width="442" height="336" class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-4190" /></a></p>
<h3><strong>Nike just announced that it is leaving its position on the US Chamber of Commerce board of directors because of the business organization&#8217;s opposition to climate action.</strong></h3>
<p> Nike doesn&#8217;t beat around the bush on why it is leaving the board.</p>
<p><a href="http://ecoworldly.com/2009/10/04/nike-opposes-us-chamber-of-commerce-leaves-board-climate-change/" class="more-link">Read more of this story &#187;</a></p>
]]></description>
    <wfw:commentRss>http://ecoworldly.com/2009/10/04/nike-opposes-us-chamber-of-commerce-leaves-board-climate-change/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>Nation&#8217;s Largest Utility Leaves US Chamber of Commerce &#8212; Because of Climate Change?</title>
    <link>http://cleantechnica.com/2009/09/29/nations-largest-utility-leaves-us-chamber-of-commerce-because-of-climate-change/</link>
    <comments>http://cleantechnica.com/2009/09/29/nations-largest-utility-leaves-us-chamber-of-commerce-because-of-climate-change/#comments</comments>
    <pubDate>Tue, 29 Sep 2009 21:55:46 +0000</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Zachary Shahan</dc:creator>
    
		<category><![CDATA[Climate Change]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[business]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[global warming]]></category>

    <guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/2009/09/29/nations-largest-utility-leaves-us-chamber-of-commerce-because-of-climate-change/</guid>
    <description><![CDATA[<p><a href='http://cleantechnica.com/files/2009/09/nuclear.jpg'><img src="http://go635254.s3.amazonaws.com/cleantechnica/files/2009/09/nuclear.jpg" alt="" width="500" height="375" class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-3547" /></a></p>
<h3>John Rowe, Exelon CEO, said yesterday that climate change legislation is an urgent issue. At the same time, he announced that the nation&#8217;s largest utility would not be renewing its membership with the US Chamber of Commerce because of the Chamber of Commerce&#8217;s opposition to climate legislation.</h3>
<p><a href="http://cleantechnica.com/2009/09/29/nations-largest-utility-leaves-us-chamber-of-commerce-because-of-climate-change/" class="more-link">Read more of this story &#187;</a></p>
]]></description>
    <wfw:commentRss>http://cleantechnica.com/2009/09/29/nations-largest-utility-leaves-us-chamber-of-commerce-because-of-climate-change/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>United States Finally Gets Behind Climate Legislation</title>
    <link>http://redgreenandblue.org/2009/08/13/united-states-finally-gets-behind-climate-legislation/</link>
    <comments>http://redgreenandblue.org/2009/08/13/united-states-finally-gets-behind-climate-legislation/#comments</comments>
    <pubDate>Thu, 13 Aug 2009 18:21:09 +0000</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Daniel Hohler</dc:creator>
    
		<category><![CDATA[Climate Change]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Leader]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Policy]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[U.S.]]></category>

    <guid isPermaLink="false">http://redgreenandblue.org/2009/08/13/united-states-finally-gets-behind-climate-legislation/</guid>
    <description><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://redgreenandblue.org/files/2009/08/us.jpg"><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-3502" src="http://go635254.s3.amazonaws.com/redgreenandblue/files/2009/08/us.jpg" alt="" width="500" height="375" /></a></p>

<p>In a recent Zogby telephone poll conducted to gauge public opinion on the the Waxman-Markey climate bill, the results showed that a majority of Americans are finally behind climate legislation. The Waxman-Markey climate bill sets out to limit greenhouse gases in the US in order to combat climate change. The bill was just narrowly passed in congress last June by a vote of 219-212.</p>
<p>In the recent past, Americans have shown no interest in changing policy to limit greenhouse gasses, yet shockingly the results of this latest poll show that a whopping 71% of Americans support this bill. The poll also showed that Americans of every age, income group, and political affiliation support the bill much more than previously thought. An enormous win for those of us who want to see reduction in greenhouse gasses.</p>
<p><a href="http://redgreenandblue.org/2009/08/13/united-states-finally-gets-behind-climate-legislation/" class="more-link">Read more of this story &#187;</a></p>
]]></description>
    <wfw:commentRss>http://redgreenandblue.org/2009/08/13/united-states-finally-gets-behind-climate-legislation/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>46 Energy Frontier Research Centers Funded by DOE</title>
    <link>http://cleantechnica.com/2009/08/10/46-energy-frontier-research-centers-funded-by-doe/</link>
    <comments>http://cleantechnica.com/2009/08/10/46-energy-frontier-research-centers-funded-by-doe/#comments</comments>
    <pubDate>Mon, 10 Aug 2009 18:40:42 +0000</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Yael Borofsky</dc:creator>
    
		<category><![CDATA[alternative energy]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[technology]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[wind energy]]></category>

    <guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/2009/08/10/46-energy-frontier-research-centers-funded-by-doe/</guid>
    <description><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://cleantechnica.com/files/2009/08/2247976381_6ca4567e741.jpg"><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-3078" src="http://go635254.s3.amazonaws.com/cleantechnica/files/2009/08/2247976381_6ca4567e741.jpg" alt="" width="357" height="500" /></a></p>

<p>After a  <a href="http://www.er.doe.gov/bes/efrc.html" target="_blank">White House announcement</a> last April regarding the provision of $777 million to fund 46 Energy Frontier Research Centers (EFRC&#8217;s) advancing innovation in clean energy technology, the Department of Energy (DOE) recognized the <a href="http://www.energy.gov/news2009/7768.htm" target="_blank">completion of the funding process</a> last Thursday. The investment represents a much-needed show of governmental support for the research and development of the numerous energy breakthroughs necessary to transition the U.S from dirty to clean energy.</p>
<p>Among the <a href="http://www.sc.doe.gov/bes/EFRC_Award_List.pdf" target="_blank">list of 46</a>, 31 centers are affiliated with universities, twelve are DOE national laboratories, two are non-profit organizations, and one is a corporate research laboratory.  In total, the DOE has awarded $377 million in funding this year, with $277 million coming from the economic stimulus package (American Recovery and Reinvestment Act -ARRA) and the additional $100 million provided by the DOE’s FY2009 budget.
<p><a href="http://cleantechnica.com/2009/08/10/46-energy-frontier-research-centers-funded-by-doe/" class="more-link">Read more of this story &#187;</a></p>
]]></description>
    <wfw:commentRss>http://cleantechnica.com/2009/08/10/46-energy-frontier-research-centers-funded-by-doe/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>The Story of Sustainability</title>
    <link>http://sustainablog.org/2009/08/05/the-story-of-sustainability/</link>
    <comments>http://sustainablog.org/2009/08/05/the-story-of-sustainability/#comments</comments>
    <pubDate>Wed, 05 Aug 2009 16:22:54 +0000</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>John Ivanko</dc:creator>
    
		<category><![CDATA[Education]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Sustainability]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

    <guid isPermaLink="false">http://sustainablog.org/2009/08/05/the-story-of-sustainability/</guid>
    <description><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://sustainablog.org/files/2009/08/storytelling-paige_3714.jpg"><img class="alignright size-full wp-image-4782" src="http://go635254.s3.amazonaws.com/sustainablog/files/2009/08/storytelling-paige_3714.jpg" alt="" width="238" height="158" /></a>We’ve all heard of <a href="http://www.storyofstuff.com/">The Story of Stuff</a>.<span> </span>But The Story of Sustainability?</p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><!--[if !supportEmptyParas]--><!--[endif]--></p>
<p class="MsoNormal">This past weekend, we had the pleasure of hosting Dennis Paige, founder of <a href="http://storytelling.org/Swiftdeer/">Swiftdeer-Paige</a>, at <a href="http://www.innserendipity.com">Inn Serendipity</a> to share a program on storytelling with our community of friends and family. Awarded the 2008 Grassroots Conservation Leadership Award from the Audubon-Chicago Region and the Chicago Wilderness Habitat Project, Paige has been entertaining and teaching thousands of people about the most pressing ecological issues of our times while inspiring a more balanced relationship with the web of life through the craft of storytelling.<span> </span>He’s been at it since 1989.<span> </span> <!--[endif]--></p>
<p class="MsoNormal">Paige’s hour-long program was a reminder of how far we still need to go on our journey of creating a &#8220;Story of Sustainability&#8221; that most American’s can embrace, not just a few.<span> </span>Obviously, the present American story of <a href="http://sustainablog.org/2008/07/16/economics-a-return-to-place-permanance-and-nature-not-more-bigger-faster/">never-ending growth</a>, executive bonuses, <a href="http://sustainablog.org/2008/06/04/why-are-people-called-consumers/">consumer-based economy</a>, and more jobs is not compatible with the long term sustainability of a finite planet – especially if you recognize that despite our technological know-how, two thirds of the planet’s human inhabitants still cannot drink a glass of safe water, for example.</p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><!--[if !supportEmptyParas]--> <!--[endif]--></p>
<p class="MsoNormal">Elements of a Great Story</p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><!--[if !supportEmptyParas]--> <!--[endif]--></p>
<p class="MsoNormal">According to Paige, the elements of a great story are imagination, believability and content.<span> </span>Our group of local friends, bed &#38; breakfast guests and family members circled around Paige as he orchestrated various activities to help our group, who ranged in ages from 4 to 80, become better storytellers and understand this ancient art and craft of storytelling. In terms of the content, it’s all about the problem, resolution and moral of the story.</p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><!--[if !supportEmptyParas]-->
<p><a href="http://sustainablog.org/2009/08/05/the-story-of-sustainability/" class="more-link">Read more of this story &#187;</a></p>
]]></description>
    <wfw:commentRss>http://sustainablog.org/2009/08/05/the-story-of-sustainability/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>Congress Slashes Obama&#8217;s Energy Education Program in Energy and Water Bill</title>
    <link>http://cleantechnica.com/2009/08/03/congress-slashes-obamas-energy-education-program-in-energy-and-water-bill/</link>
    <comments>http://cleantechnica.com/2009/08/03/congress-slashes-obamas-energy-education-program-in-energy-and-water-bill/#comments</comments>
    <pubDate>Mon, 03 Aug 2009 19:17:14 +0000</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Yael Borofsky</dc:creator>
    
		<category><![CDATA[technology]]></category>

    <guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/2009/08/03/congress-slashes-obamas-energy-education-program-in-energy-and-water-bill/</guid>
    <description><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://cleantechnica.com/files/2009/08/3456420866_5ee377b279.jpg"><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-3030" src="http://go635254.s3.amazonaws.com/cleantechnica/files/2009/08/3456420866_5ee377b279.jpg" alt="Little girl learning about wind turbines." width="500" height="332" /></a></p>

<p>Last Wednesday, the Senate passed the Energy and Water Appropriations Bill (H.R. 3183), appropriating $34.3 billion in energy spending for FY2010. Although the bill made good on Obama&#8217;s campaign promise to shut down Nevada&#8217;s Yucca Mountain nuclear waste facility and funds numerous Army Corps of Engineers&#8217; water initiatives, the bill is shockingly silent with regard to Obama&#8217;s energy education program <a href="http://cleantechnica.com/2009/07/22/over-100-groups-urge-senate-to-re-energyse-kids-like-obama-had-promised/" target="_blank">RE-ENERGYSE</a>.</p>
<p>A <a href="http://www.time.com/time/health/article/0,8599,1913781,00.html" target="_blank">recent article by TIME&#8217;s Bryan Walsh</a> also calls attention to Congress&#8217;s stinginess with Obama&#8217;s Energy Secretary, Steven Chu&#8217;s proposed &#8220;energy innovation hubs,&#8221; to which the House appropriated $35 million of $280 million he suggested. This allotment is enough to pay for one hub, not the eight R&#38;D centers called for in Chu&#8217;s proposal.
<p><a href="http://cleantechnica.com/2009/08/03/congress-slashes-obamas-energy-education-program-in-energy-and-water-bill/" class="more-link">Read more of this story &#187;</a></p>
]]></description>
    <wfw:commentRss>http://cleantechnica.com/2009/08/03/congress-slashes-obamas-energy-education-program-in-energy-and-water-bill/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>Renewable Energy on the Rise, Fossil Fuels Declining</title>
    <link>http://cleantechnica.com/2009/07/30/renewable-energy-on-the-rise-fossil-fuels-declining/</link>
    <comments>http://cleantechnica.com/2009/07/30/renewable-energy-on-the-rise-fossil-fuels-declining/#comments</comments>
    <pubDate>Thu, 30 Jul 2009 20:45:43 +0000</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Zachary Shahan</dc:creator>
    
		<category><![CDATA[alternative energy]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[fossil fuels]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[politics]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[solar energy]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[technology]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[wave energy]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[wind energy]]></category>

    <guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/2009/07/30/renewable-energy-on-the-rise-fossil-fuels-declining/</guid>
    <description><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://cleantechnica.com/files/2009/07/windmill.jpg"><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-3001" src="http://go635254.s3.amazonaws.com/cleantechnica/files/2009/07/windmill.jpg" alt="" width="399" height="500" /></a></p>

<p><strong>The U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) reported good news for renewable energy enthusiasts this week. Energy from renewable resources has increased significantly over the last year. It is now higher than energy produced from nuclear power.</strong></p>
<p><a href="http://cleantechnica.com/2009/07/30/renewable-energy-on-the-rise-fossil-fuels-declining/" class="more-link">Read more of this story &#187;</a></p>
]]></description>
    <wfw:commentRss>http://cleantechnica.com/2009/07/30/renewable-energy-on-the-rise-fossil-fuels-declining/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>US Congress To Pass Ban on &#8220;Finning&#8221; to Protect Sharks</title>
    <link>http://ecoworldly.com/2009/07/29/us-congress-to-pass-ban-on-finning-to-protect-sharks/</link>
    <comments>http://ecoworldly.com/2009/07/29/us-congress-to-pass-ban-on-finning-to-protect-sharks/#comments</comments>
    <pubDate>Wed, 29 Jul 2009 20:44:37 +0000</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Michael Ricciardi</dc:creator>
    
		<category><![CDATA[About Animals]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[About Politics]]></category>

    <guid isPermaLink="false">http://ecoworldly.com/2009/07/29/us-congress-to-pass-ban-on-finning-to-protect-sharks/</guid>
    <description><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://ecoworldly.com/files/2009/07/surfacing_great_white_shark.jpg"><img class="aligncenter size-medium wp-image-3400" src="http://go635254.s3.amazonaws.com/ecoworldly/files/2009/07/surfacing_great_white_shark-500x495.jpg" alt="surfacing great white shark" width="500" height="495" /></a></p>

<p><strong>According to the most recent data estimates, roughly 70 million sharks are caught (and killed) each year, most of this is for food, some for sport, and sadly, some just out of fear. </strong></p>
<p>But most of the commercially fished sharks are in fact killed for their fins only&#8211;their mutilated carcasses are simply tossed overboard. This is known as &#8220;finning&#8221;. The fins make their way into a dish known as shark fin soup&#8211;a prized delicacy in Japan but also in some Scandinavian countries and in Germany. And as its popularity increases, so do catches&#8211;and almost any shark will do (100 out of 400 species are presently exploited for food, according to the <a href="http://www.shark.ch/Database/EndangeredSharks/index.html?lim=2&#38;slang=2" target="_blank">Shark Foundation</a>). According to the <a href="www.iucnredlist.org/" target="_blank">IUCN</a> (which tracks endangered species with its annual &#8220;<a href="www.iucnredlist.org/" target="_blank">red list</a>&#8220;) and governmental and NGO conservation groups, one third or more of all shark species are endangered.</p>
<p><a href="http://ecoworldly.com/2009/07/29/us-congress-to-pass-ban-on-finning-to-protect-sharks/" class="more-link">Read more of this story &#187;</a></p>
]]></description>
    <wfw:commentRss>http://ecoworldly.com/2009/07/29/us-congress-to-pass-ban-on-finning-to-protect-sharks/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>Transformational Transportation Bill is &#8216;in Traffic&#8217;</title>
    <link>http://planetsave.com/blog/2009/07/25/transformational-transportation-bill-is-in-traffic/</link>
    <comments>http://planetsave.com/blog/2009/07/25/transformational-transportation-bill-is-in-traffic/#comments</comments>
    <pubDate>Sat, 25 Jul 2009 16:51:20 +0000</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Zachary Shahan</dc:creator>
    
		<category><![CDATA[Action &amp; Activism]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Energy &amp; Fuel]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Environmental Policies]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Legislation]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Planetsave]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Transport]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Travel]]></category>

    <guid isPermaLink="false">http://planetsave.com/blog/2009/07/25/transformational-transportation-bill-is-in-traffic/</guid>
    <description><![CDATA[<p><a href='http://planetsave.com/files/2009/07/mono.jpg'><img src="http://go635254.s3.amazonaws.com/planetsave/files/2009/07/mono.jpg" alt="" width="500" height="333" class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-4789" /></a><strong>Advocates for better, green transportation achieved great success this year with a <a href="http://capwiz.com/napta/issues/alert/?alertid=13580121&#38;type=CO">transportation bill</a> in the House of Representatives that could change the United States forever. Not only advocates have brought this to where it is, though. The general public, the US Chamber of Commerce, AAA, the AFL-CIO, Associated General Contractors of America, and others have brought it to where it is today. This progressive bill would reverse auto-centric federal transportation policies that have led the US into various environmental, social and economic crises for the past several decades. </strong></p>
<p>Unfortunately, delay due to lawmakers&#8217; inability to come to a consensus and the Obama administration&#8217;s reluctancy to increase gas prices at this time (<a href="http://www.cato.org/pub_display.php?pub_id=6440">which are <strong>much</strong> lower, in real terms, than they were 54 years ago</a>) may postpone the bill for another 18 months. <strong>However, there is opportunity to take action!</strong></p>
<p><a href="http://planetsave.com/blog/2009/07/25/transformational-transportation-bill-is-in-traffic/" class="more-link">Read more of this story &#187;</a></p>
]]></description>
    <wfw:commentRss>http://planetsave.com/blog/2009/07/25/transformational-transportation-bill-is-in-traffic/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>How Much Does Your Senator Really Care About Climate Change?</title>
    <link>http://redgreenandblue.org/2009/07/23/how-much-does-your-senator-really-care-about-climate-change/</link>
    <comments>http://redgreenandblue.org/2009/07/23/how-much-does-your-senator-really-care-about-climate-change/#comments</comments>
    <pubDate>Fri, 24 Jul 2009 00:15:05 +0000</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Timothy B. Hurst</dc:creator>
    
		<category><![CDATA[Climate Change]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Energy]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Leader]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[U.S.]]></category>

    <guid isPermaLink="false">http://redgreenandblue.org/2009/07/23/how-much-does-your-senator-really-care-about-climate-change/</guid>
    <description><![CDATA[<p style="text-align: center"><img class="alignnone size-full wp-image-3424 aligncenter" src="http://go635254.s3.amazonaws.com/redgreenandblue/files/2009/07/capitol_lightning.jpg" alt="" width="400" height="265" /></p>
<p style="text-align: left"></p>
<p style="text-align: left">Armed with the knowledge we gleaned last year—that roughly <a href="http://ecopolitology.org/2008/06/09/74-of-gop-senators-doubt-human-causes-of-global-warming/">three-quarters of Republican Senators doubted the human causes of global warming</a>—it was less shocking to learn today that the websites of GOP Senators were, by and large, not so hot when it came to presenting their positions on energy, environment and climate change issues. Then again, neither were the Democrats&#8217;.</p>
<p style="text-align: left">How do I know all this? The good folks at <em>Grist</em> put together a <a href="http://www.grist.org/article/2009-07-23-grading-senate-websites-climate-energy">comprehensive analysis</a> of the 50 Senators&#8217; treatment of energy and climate on their interwebs pages. And the results weren&#8217;t exactly flattering.
<p><a href="http://redgreenandblue.org/2009/07/23/how-much-does-your-senator-really-care-about-climate-change/" class="more-link">Read more of this story &#187;</a></p>
]]></description>
    <wfw:commentRss>http://redgreenandblue.org/2009/07/23/how-much-does-your-senator-really-care-about-climate-change/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>US Secretary of Transportation Says &#8220;Cut Down on Driving!&#8221; &#8212; 2 Key Steps</title>
    <link>http://planetsave.com/blog/2009/07/22/us-secretary-of-transportation-says-cut-down-on-driving-2-key-steps/</link>
    <comments>http://planetsave.com/blog/2009/07/22/us-secretary-of-transportation-says-cut-down-on-driving-2-key-steps/#comments</comments>
    <pubDate>Wed, 22 Jul 2009 22:31:09 +0000</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Zachary Shahan</dc:creator>
    
		<category><![CDATA[Climate change]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Energy &amp; Fuel]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Legislation]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Lifestyle]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Planetsave]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Transport]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Travel]]></category>

    <guid isPermaLink="false">http://planetsave.com/blog/2009/07/22/us-secretary-of-transportation-says-cut-down-on-driving-2-key-steps/</guid>
    <description><![CDATA[<p><a href='http://planetsave.com/files/2009/07/carsiicompressed.jpg'><img src="http://go635254.s3.amazonaws.com/planetsave/files/2009/07/carsiicompressed.jpg" alt="" width="448" height="297" class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-4758" /></a><br />
On the <a href="http://fastlane.dot.gov/2009/07/smart-community-planning-more-transportation-options-lead-to-a-reduced-carbon-emissions.html">official blog of the US Secretary of Transportation</a> last week, Ray LaHood stated that driving less is the key to reducing carbon emissions, plain and simple. He gave an outline, on his blog, of what he said to the Senate Committee on Environment and Public Works earlier that day and this was the bottom line. However, how we get there &#8212; how to encourage people to drive less &#8212; was another key aspect of his presentation and blog post.</p>
<p><a href="http://planetsave.com/blog/2009/07/22/us-secretary-of-transportation-says-cut-down-on-driving-2-key-steps/" class="more-link">Read more of this story &#187;</a></p>
]]></description>
    <wfw:commentRss>http://planetsave.com/blog/2009/07/22/us-secretary-of-transportation-says-cut-down-on-driving-2-key-steps/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>6 Reasons a Carbon Tax is Better than Cap and Trade</title>
    <link>http://redgreenandblue.org/2009/07/17/6-reasons-a-carbon-tax-is-better-than-cap-and-trade/</link>
    <comments>http://redgreenandblue.org/2009/07/17/6-reasons-a-carbon-tax-is-better-than-cap-and-trade/#comments</comments>
    <pubDate>Fri, 17 Jul 2009 18:55:15 +0000</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Timothy B. Hurst</dc:creator>
    
		<category><![CDATA[Climate Change]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[EC Leader]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Choice]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Policy]]></category>

    <guid isPermaLink="false">http://redgreenandblue.org/2009/07/17/6-reasons-a-carbon-tax-is-better-than-cap-and-trade/</guid>
    <description><![CDATA[<p style="text-align: center"><a href="http://redgreenandblue.org/files/2009/07/co2_resize.jpg"><img class="alignnone size-full wp-image-3390 aligncenter" src="http://go635254.s3.amazonaws.com/redgreenandblue/files/2009/07/co2_resize.jpg" alt="cap-and-trade; carbon tax" width="500" height="333" /></a></p>

<p>Just when you thought <a href="http://www.grist.org/article/2009-05-08-carbon-tax-vs-cap-and-trade/">no more ink</a> could be <a href="http://e360.yale.edu/content/feature.msp?id=2148">spilled</a> about the merits or political viability of a <strong><a href="http://greenoptions.com/search/?q=carbon+tax"><strong>carbon tax</strong></a></strong> versus a <a href="http://greenoptions.com/search/?q=cap+and+trade"><strong>cap-and-trade</strong></a>, it has. With the House passage of the American Clean Energy and Security Act (ACES), also known as Waxman-Markey, a version of the bill is now being considered by the Senate. And while there are certainly <a href="http://www.grist.org/article/revised-and-updated-things-i-love-and-hate-about-waxman-markey/">things to both love and hate about Waxman-Markey</a>, it may be the only hope we currently have for meaningful climate change legislation. But are there other options?</p>
<p>Now, I&#8217;m not saying in all cases a carbon tax is superior to a cap-and-trade, in fact, I may just write a &#8220;7 Reasons a Cap-and-Trade is Better than a Carbon Tax&#8221; post after this one. But in some instances, the straight tax does have its advantages.
<p><a href="http://redgreenandblue.org/2009/07/17/6-reasons-a-carbon-tax-is-better-than-cap-and-trade/" class="more-link">Read more of this story &#187;</a></p>
]]></description>
    <wfw:commentRss>http://redgreenandblue.org/2009/07/17/6-reasons-a-carbon-tax-is-better-than-cap-and-trade/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>Utah Land Swap: A Win-Win Situation for All</title>
    <link>http://planetsave.com/blog/2009/07/16/utah-land-swap-a-win-win-situation-for-all/</link>
    <comments>http://planetsave.com/blog/2009/07/16/utah-land-swap-a-win-win-situation-for-all/#comments</comments>
    <pubDate>Thu, 16 Jul 2009 00:07:02 +0000</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Ruedigar Matthes</dc:creator>
    
		<category><![CDATA[Legislation]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Nature &amp; Conservation]]></category>

    <guid isPermaLink="false">http://planetsave.com/blog/2009/07/16/utah-land-swap-a-win-win-situation-for-all/</guid>
    <description><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://planetsave.com/files/2009/07/moab.jpg"><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-4692" src="http://go635254.s3.amazonaws.com/planetsave/files/2009/07/moab.jpg" alt="" width="500" height="375" /></a></p>
<p>With some of the world&#8217;s most spectacular landscapes, Utah is a haven for the seeker of peace and a respite from the industrialization of the modern world. But those <a href="http://planetsave.com/blog/2009/05/28/paving-wilderness-peril-in-utahs-book-cliffs/" target="_blank">lands have long been in the cross hairs of development&#8217;s long sight.</a> With the possibility of an oil well beneath the Fisher Towers, a mine in Moab’s Goldbar Canyon or an off-road vehicle trail paralleling the Colorado River in Westwater Canyon, lovers of the land have fought for decades to preserve the solitude of the desert.</p>
<p><a href="http://planetsave.com/blog/2009/07/16/utah-land-swap-a-win-win-situation-for-all/" class="more-link">Read more of this story &#187;</a></p>
]]></description>
    <wfw:commentRss>http://planetsave.com/blog/2009/07/16/utah-land-swap-a-win-win-situation-for-all/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>Offshore Wind: The Best Energy Investment America Could Make?</title>
    <link>http://sustainablog.org/2009/06/26/offshore-wind-the-best-energy-investment-america-could-make/</link>
    <comments>http://sustainablog.org/2009/06/26/offshore-wind-the-best-energy-investment-america-could-make/#comments</comments>
    <pubDate>Fri, 26 Jun 2009 20:29:30 +0000</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>SolveClimate</dc:creator>
    
		<category><![CDATA[Environmental Policies]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Renewable energy]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>

    <guid isPermaLink="false">http://sustainablog.org/2009/06/26/offshore-wind-the-best-energy-investment-america-could-make/</guid>
    <description><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://sustainablog.org/files/2009/06/offshorewind.jpg"><img class="alignright size-medium wp-image-4638" src="http://go635254.s3.amazonaws.com/sustainablog/files/2009/06/offshorewind-200x300.jpg" alt="offshore wind farm copenhagen denmark" width="200" height="300" /></a><strong>By Stacy Feldman</strong>, originally published June 24, 2009, at <a href="http://solveclimate.com/blog/20090625/offshore-wind-best-energy-investment-america-could-make">SolveClimate.com</a></p>
<p>Washington is starting to wake up to something that&#8217;s been obvious to marine scientists for years. The winds blowing off U.S. waters could be a key to a national clean energy and green jobs revolution.</p>
<p>On Tuesday, the federal government awarded five leases to three companies that want to develop wind turbines off the New Jersey and Delaware coasts for the production of renewable energy.</p>
<p>They&#8217;re the first such leases the Department of Interior has ever issued for the Outer Continental Shelf. If this <a href="http://www.doi.gov/news/09_News_Releases/062309.html" target="_blank">official statement</a> is any indication, they won&#8217;t be the last:</p>
<blockquote><p>&#8220;We made the development of offshore wind energy a top priority for Interior. The technology is proven, effective and available and can create new jobs for Americans while reducing our expensive and dangerous dependence on foreign oil.&#8221;</p></blockquote>
<p>The declaration comes as the U.S. Congress is <a href="/blog/20090617/house-testimony-undermines-wisdom-massive-electric-grid-expansion" target="_blank">in the midst of a debate</a> over a proposal that would create a costly long-distance &#8220;transmission highway&#8221; to carry land-based wind energy (among other clean and dirty sources) from the Great Plains to the power-hungry cities of the American East.</p>

<p><a href="http://sustainablog.org/2009/06/26/offshore-wind-the-best-energy-investment-america-could-make/" class="more-link">Read more of this story &#187;</a></p>
]]></description>
    <wfw:commentRss>http://sustainablog.org/2009/06/26/offshore-wind-the-best-energy-investment-america-could-make/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>More Money for the Auto Industry</title>
    <link>http://inspiredeconomist.com/2009/06/24/more-money-for-the-auto-industry/</link>
    <comments>http://inspiredeconomist.com/2009/06/24/more-money-for-the-auto-industry/#comments</comments>
    <pubDate>Wed, 24 Jun 2009 23:43:09 +0000</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Lisa Wojnovich</dc:creator>
    
		<category><![CDATA[Manufacturing]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Policies]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Transportation]]></category>

    <guid isPermaLink="false">http://inspiredeconomist.com/2009/06/24/more-money-for-the-auto-industry/</guid>
    <description><![CDATA[<p><img class="alignright size-full wp-image-1517" src="http://go635254.s3.amazonaws.com/inspiredeconomist/files/2009/06/tesla-model-s.jpg" alt="The new Tesla Model S" width="240" height="160" />Three more car companies received sizeable loans from the federal government yesterday, but don’t worry; it’s not another bailout. In fact, the$8 billion is just the start of a larger $25 billion project called the Advanced Technology Vehicles Manufacturing Loan Program (ATVM for short) that was thought up back in 2007 and funded by Congress in late 2008 during the Bush administration. The project, overseen by the Department of Energy, is a federal grant and loan initiative bent on providing low interest capital to <a href="http://inspiredeconomist.com/2009/01/21/the-chevy-volt-coming-soon-to-a-dealership-near-you/" target="_self">automobile manufacturers</a> — as well as the makers of their component parts — to promote the development of new automobile technologies that guzzle less gas — and in some cases, <a href="http://inspiredeconomist.com/2009/03/14/unwrap-a-smile/" target="_self">no gas at all</a>.</p>
<p><a href="http://inspiredeconomist.com/2009/06/24/more-money-for-the-auto-industry/" class="more-link">Read more of this story &#187;</a></p>
]]></description>
    <wfw:commentRss>http://inspiredeconomist.com/2009/06/24/more-money-for-the-auto-industry/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>Senate Committee Passes Drilling and Energy Legislation</title>
    <link>http://redgreenandblue.org/2009/06/18/senate-panel-passes-drilling-and-energy-bill/</link>
    <comments>http://redgreenandblue.org/2009/06/18/senate-panel-passes-drilling-and-energy-bill/#comments</comments>
    <pubDate>Thu, 18 Jun 2009 17:05:09 +0000</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Dave Levitan</dc:creator>
    
		<category><![CDATA[Leader]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Policy]]></category>

    <guid isPermaLink="false">http://redgreenandblue.org/2009/06/18/senate-panel-passes-drilling-and-energy-bill/</guid>
    <description><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://redgreenandblue.org/files/2009/06/platformholly.jpg"><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-3269" src="http://go635254.s3.amazonaws.com/redgreenandblue/files/2009/06/platformholly.jpg" alt="Offshore drilling would increase if the Senate bill passes." width="480" height="360" /></a></p>
<p>The Senate Energy and Natural Resources Committee approved by a vote of 15 to 8 a <a href="http://energy.senate.gov/public/index.cfm?FuseAction=PressReleases.Detail&#38;PressRelease_id=a3fe85e3-8145-4b45-bb0b-1df967416a1f&#38;Month=6&#38;Year=2009&#38;Party=0" target="_blank">piece of legislation</a> that would open up huge areas of the Gulf of Mexico and elsewhere for <a href="http://planetsave.com/blog/2008/08/29/expand-offshore-drilling-three-words-for-you-katrina-rita-gustav/" target="_self">drilling of oil and natural gas</a>. It also contains requirements for increases in renewable energy generation, and a number of other energy-related measures, but it seems a sad and regressive alternative to <a href="http://redgreenandblue.org/2009/05/16/climate-change-bill-has-a-coming-out-party/" target="_self">Waxman-Markey</a>, which may reach a floor vote in the House by next week.
<p><a href="http://redgreenandblue.org/2009/06/18/senate-panel-passes-drilling-and-energy-bill/" class="more-link">Read more of this story &#187;</a></p>
]]></description>
    <wfw:commentRss>http://redgreenandblue.org/2009/06/18/senate-panel-passes-drilling-and-energy-bill/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>National Renewable Energy Lab Looks at Proposed U.S. Electricity Standards</title>
    <link>http://cleantechnica.com/2009/06/02/national-renewable-energy-lab-looks-at-proposed-us-standards/</link>
    <comments>http://cleantechnica.com/2009/06/02/national-renewable-energy-lab-looks-at-proposed-us-standards/#comments</comments>
    <pubDate>Tue, 02 Jun 2009 20:14:20 +0000</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Jeff Kart</dc:creator>
    
		<category><![CDATA[Climate Change]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[alternative energy]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[business]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[energy efficiency]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[solar energy]]></category>

    <guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/2009/06/02/national-renewable-energy-lab-looks-at-proposed-us-standards/</guid>
    <description><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://farm1.static.flickr.com/50/130685037_94fb63cd33.jpg?v=0"><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-2606" src="http://go635254.s3.amazonaws.com/cleantechnica/files/2009/05/solar-farm.jpg" alt="Soalr Farm in California" width="500" height="375" /></a>The United States have already started down the path of Renewable Portfolio Standards.</p>
<p>There are now <a href="http://apps1.eere.energy.gov/states/maps/renewable_portfolio_states.cfm" target="_blank">almost 30 states with their own RPSes</a>, which require utilities to generate more of their power from renewable sources, like wind and solar and even landfill gas. Different states have set different standards, often with percentages based on years: 15 percent by 2015, for instance. It&#8217;s more catchy that way.</p>
<p>Now Congress is discussing a national RPS, which would set minimum standards for all states. RPSes, also known as Renewable Electricity Standards, can drive investment in renewable technologies. They can pave the way for new investment in turbines and panels, and associated jobs that come with the pay out. Sure, renewables may cost more for now, but you probably remember that <a href="http://www.economist.com/business/management/displaystory.cfm?story_id=12446567" target="_blank">economies of scale</a> thing from high school.</p>
<ul class="category-links">
<li>» <a href="http://solardenver.1bog.org/" target="blank">Consumer solar power aggregation project launched in Denver, CO</a></li>
<li>» <a href="/feed/">Get CleanTechnica by RSS</a> or <a href="http://feedburner.google.com/fb/a/mailverify?uri=cleantechnica/com">sign up by email</a>.</li>
</ul>
<p><a href="http://www.nrel.gov/" target="_blank">The National Renewable Energy Laboratory</a> looks at three proposed standards <a href="http://www.nrel.gov/docs/fy09osti/45877.pdf ." target="_blank">in a new 30-page report (.pdf)</a>. They&#8217;re the master plans &#8212; from Senator Jeff Bingaman and Representative Edward Markey, and jointly by representatives Henry Waxman and Markey &#8212; that have risen to the top for now, being discussed in U.S. House and Senate committees.</p>
<p>The bottom line: The report doesn&#8217;t really choose a &#8220;best plan.&#8221; But Markey seems to get the best marks for a 25% by 2025 RES target with no energy efficiency substitutions allowed.</p>
<p>&#8220;The Markey RES legislation requires significantly greater renewable power deployment and the construction of new transmission infrastructure in a timely manner,&#8221; it says on pdf page 22.</p>
<p>Browse the report, and tell me what you think. Which of these plans is best for America? Or is there a fourth plan that was left out?</p>
<p>Image Credit: <a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/divwerf/130685037/" target="_blank">Divwerf</a> via flickr under Creative Commons License</p>
]]></description>
    <wfw:commentRss>http://cleantechnica.com/2009/06/02/national-renewable-energy-lab-looks-at-proposed-us-standards/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>Waxman-Markey: What the Big Green Guns Are Saying</title>
    <link>http://redgreenandblue.org/2009/05/18/waxman-markey-what-the-big-green-guns-are-saying/</link>
    <comments>http://redgreenandblue.org/2009/05/18/waxman-markey-what-the-big-green-guns-are-saying/#comments</comments>
    <pubDate>Mon, 18 May 2009 15:53:44 +0000</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Dave Levitan</dc:creator>
    
		<category><![CDATA[EC Leader]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Choice]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Policy]]></category>

    <guid isPermaLink="false">http://redgreenandblue.org/2009/05/18/waxman-markey-what-the-big-green-guns-are-saying/</guid>
    <description><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://redgreenandblue.org/files/2009/05/capitol_building.jpg"><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-3167" src="http://go635254.s3.amazonaws.com/redgreenandblue/files/2009/05/capitol_building.jpg" alt="Markup of the ACES bill begin Monday" width="500" height="375" /></a>As discussions open in Congress today surrounding the <a href="http://energycommerce.house.gov/index.php?option=com_content&#38;view=article&#38;id=1622:chairmen-waxman-and-markey-introduce-the-american-clean-energy-and-security-act&#38;catid=122:media-advisories&#38;Itemid=80" target="_blank">American Clean Energy and Security Act </a>(the <a href="http://sustainablog.org/2009/03/31/house-energy-and-climate-legislation-released-contains-more-aggressive-measures-than-obama-plan/" target="_self">Waxman-Markey Bill</a>), I started to wonder what environmental advocacy groups&#8217; attitudes are about the climate change/green jobs/clean energy/energy independence legislation. Here is a quick rundown of statements from some of the biggest and most influential environmental groups in the country.
<p><a href="http://redgreenandblue.org/2009/05/18/waxman-markey-what-the-big-green-guns-are-saying/" class="more-link">Read more of this story &#187;</a></p>
]]></description>
    <wfw:commentRss>http://redgreenandblue.org/2009/05/18/waxman-markey-what-the-big-green-guns-are-saying/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>Climate Change Bill Has a Coming Out Party</title>
    <link>http://redgreenandblue.org/2009/05/16/climate-change-bill-has-a-coming-out-party/</link>
    <comments>http://redgreenandblue.org/2009/05/16/climate-change-bill-has-a-coming-out-party/#comments</comments>
    <pubDate>Sat, 16 May 2009 13:00:14 +0000</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Dave Levitan</dc:creator>
    
		<category><![CDATA[Climate Change]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[EC Leader]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Choice]]></category>

    <guid isPermaLink="false">http://redgreenandblue.org/2009/05/16/climate-change-bill-has-a-coming-out-party/</guid>
    <description><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://redgreenandblue.org/files/2009/05/waxman-markey.jpg"><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-3160" src="http://go635254.s3.amazonaws.com/redgreenandblue/files/2009/05/waxman-markey.jpg" alt="A long overdue sight in Congress..." width="500" height="329" /></a></p>
<h3>Well, I&#8217;m guessing they didn&#8217;t call it a coming out party. But Democrats in the House of Representatives did unveil the already heavily discussed Waxman-Markey bill on Friday, formally known as the <a href="http://energycommerce.house.gov/index.php?option=com_content&#38;view=article&#38;id=1622:chairmen-waxman-and-markey-introduce-the-american-clean-energy-and-security-act&#38;catid=122:media-advisories&#38;Itemid=80" target="_blank">American Clean Energy and Security Act</a>. It is 932 pages long. And no, I haven&#8217;t read all of it. So don&#8217;t feel too bad.</h3>
<p><a href="http://redgreenandblue.org/2009/05/16/climate-change-bill-has-a-coming-out-party/" class="more-link">Read more of this story &#187;</a></p>
]]></description>
    <wfw:commentRss>http://redgreenandblue.org/2009/05/16/climate-change-bill-has-a-coming-out-party/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
  </item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- 690 queries in 1.788 seconds. -->