<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
  xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
  xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
  >

<channel>
  <title>Green Options &#187; conocophillips</title>
  <link>http://greenoptions.com/tag/conocophillips</link>
  <description>Posts tagged 'conocophillips'</description>
  <pubDate>Wed, 07 Oct 2009 20:56:34 +0000</pubDate>
  <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
  <language>en</language>
  <item>
    <title>Is the U.S. Chamber of Commerce the &#8220;Voice of Business&#8221; on Environmental Issues?</title>
    <link>http://sustainablog.org/2009/10/07/is-the-us-chamber-of-commerce-the-voice-of-business-on-environmental-issues/</link>
    <comments>http://sustainablog.org/2009/10/07/is-the-us-chamber-of-commerce-the-voice-of-business-on-environmental-issues/#comments</comments>
    <pubDate>Wed, 07 Oct 2009 20:56:34 +0000</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Cindy Tickle</dc:creator>
    
		<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Climate change]]></category>

    <guid isPermaLink="false">http://sustainablog.org/2009/10/07/is-the-us-chamber-of-commerce-the-voice-of-business-on-environmental-issues/</guid>
    <description><![CDATA[<p><a rel="attachment wp-att-5020" href="http://sustainablog.org/2009/10/07/is-the-us-chamber-of-commerce-the-voice-of-business-on-environmental-issues/369120150_459748f6dd/"><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-5020" src="http://go635254.s3.amazonaws.com/sustainablog/files/2009/10/369120150_459748f6dd.jpg" alt="Jeffrey Immelt (Chairman and C.E.O., General Electric), Jonathan Lash (President, World Resources Institute)" width="500" height="376" /></a></p>
<p> The U.S. Chamber of Commerce promotes itself as the &#8220;voice of business&#8221; by representing business ideas and interests in Washington.  Really?  If this is true, then why are so many businesses leaving the Chamber?  So far, high profile utility companies such as <a title="Nation’s Largest Utility Leaves US Chamber of Commerce — Because of Climate Change?" href="http://cleantechnica.com/2009/09/29/nations-largest-utility-leaves-us-chamber-of-commerce-because-of-climate-change/" target="_self">Exelon, Pacific Gas &#38; Electric and PNM Resources</a> have left the business association.  Apple recently sent a letter to the Chamber&#8217;s CEO, Tom Donahue, resigning their membership effective immediately.  It appears the U.S. Chamber of Commerce is doing an inadequate job of representing current business interests.  So what is all the defections and hoopla about?  Climate Change&#8230;</p>
<p><a href="http://sustainablog.org/2009/10/07/is-the-us-chamber-of-commerce-the-voice-of-business-on-environmental-issues/" class="more-link">Read more of this story &#187;</a></p>
]]></description>
    <wfw:commentRss>http://sustainablog.org/2009/10/07/is-the-us-chamber-of-commerce-the-voice-of-business-on-environmental-issues/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>ConocoPhillips Speaks Out Against Obama&#8217;s Climate Bill</title>
    <link>http://planetsave.com/blog/2009/07/06/conocophillips-speaks-out-against-obamas-climate-bill/</link>
    <comments>http://planetsave.com/blog/2009/07/06/conocophillips-speaks-out-against-obamas-climate-bill/#comments</comments>
    <pubDate>Mon, 06 Jul 2009 22:31:10 +0000</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Ruedigar Matthes</dc:creator>
    
		<category><![CDATA[Energy &amp; Fuel]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Legislation]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>

    <guid isPermaLink="false">http://planetsave.com/blog/2009/07/06/conocophillips-speaks-out-against-obamas-climate-bill/</guid>
    <description><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://ecopreneurist.com/files/2009/07/conoco.jpg"><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-1759" src="http://ecopreneurist.com/files/2009/07/conoco.jpg" alt="" width="500" height="343" /></a></p>
<p><strong>The recent passage of <a href="http://www.opencongress.org/bill/111-h2454/show" target="_blank">the American Clean Energy and Security Act (ACESA)</a> through the House of Representatives has sparked a number of debates. Opponents and proponents of the Waxman-Markley Bill have thrown words around, trying to gain support for their side.</strong></p>
<p><a href="http://redgreenandblue.org/2009/06/27/gops-boehner-calls-climate-bill-ridicilous-pile-of-sht/" target="_blank">House GOP leader John Boehner of Ohio stated</a> that, “By imposing a tax on every American who drives a car or flips on a light switch, <a href="http://redgreenandblue.org/2009/06/23/cbo-waxman-markey-climate-bill-to-cost-just-175household/" target="_blank">this plan will drive up the prices</a> for food, gasoline and electricity.” Meanwhile <a href="http://redgreenandblue.org/2009/06/27/obama-urges-senate-to-pass-climate-bill-video/" target="_blank">President Obama urged the passage of the bill in the Senate</a>, saying that we can&#8217;t &#8220;believe the misinformation out there that suggests there is somehow a contradiction between investing in clean energy and economic growth.”</p>
<p><a href="http://planetsave.com/blog/2009/07/06/conocophillips-speaks-out-against-obamas-climate-bill/" class="more-link">Read more of this story &#187;</a></p>
]]></description>
    <wfw:commentRss>http://planetsave.com/blog/2009/07/06/conocophillips-speaks-out-against-obamas-climate-bill/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>US Scientists Say Burning Ice Could Provide Green Power</title>
    <link>http://cleantechnica.com/2009/03/30/us-scientists-say-burning-ice-could-provide-green-power/</link>
    <comments>http://cleantechnica.com/2009/03/30/us-scientists-say-burning-ice-could-provide-green-power/#comments</comments>
    <pubDate>Mon, 30 Mar 2009 10:58:43 +0000</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Andrew Williams</dc:creator>
    
		<category><![CDATA[carbon emissions]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[fossil fuels]]></category>

    <guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/2009/03/30/us-scientists-say-burning-ice-could-provide-green-power/</guid>
    <description><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://cleantechnica.com/files/2009/03/ice-fossil-fuel-clathrate-hydrate.jpg"><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-2422" src="http://go635254.s3.amazonaws.com/cleantechnica/files/2009/03/ice-fossil-fuel-clathrate-hydrate.jpg" alt="" width="500" height="333" /></a></p>

<p><strong>US Scientists have revealed how <a title="ice energy power hydrate" href="http://www.newscientist.com/article/dn16848-ice-that-burns-could-be-a-green-fossil-fuel.html" target="_blank">natural gas locked up in frozen water crystals could provide massive amounts of energy</a>, and claim that it could even be totally emissions-free.</strong></p>
<p>The astonishing claim was made by Tim Collett of the <strong><a title="USGS" href="http://www.usgs.gov/" target="_blank">United States Geological Survey</a></strong> at last weeks national meeting of the American Chemical Society. Collett told the gathering that, to the naked eye, <strong><a title="clathrate hydrate" href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Clathrate_hydrate" target="_blank">clathrate hydrate</a></strong> (CH) looks like everyday ice but, as well as being partly made of water, the molecules are also organised into &#8220;cages&#8221;, which trap individual molecules of methane.</p>
<p>Remarkably, a new method of extracting the methane and &#8217;swapping&#8217; it with carbon dioxide could turn the substance into a revolutionary carbon-neutral fossil fuel.</p>
<p><a href="http://cleantechnica.com/2009/03/30/us-scientists-say-burning-ice-could-provide-green-power/" class="more-link">Read more of this story &#187;</a></p>
]]></description>
    <wfw:commentRss>http://cleantechnica.com/2009/03/30/us-scientists-say-burning-ice-could-provide-green-power/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>U.S. Government Axes &#8220;Renewable Diesel&#8221; Tax Credit</title>
    <link>http://gas2.org/2008/09/24/us-government-axes-biodiesel-from-waste-tax-credit/</link>
    <comments>http://gas2.org/2008/09/24/us-government-axes-biodiesel-from-waste-tax-credit/#comments</comments>
    <pubDate>Wed, 24 Sep 2008 19:06:42 +0000</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Nick Chambers</dc:creator>
    
		<category><![CDATA[Biodiesel]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Policy]]></category>

    <guid isPermaLink="false">http://gas2.org/2008/09/24/us-government-axes-biodiesel-from-waste-tax-credit/</guid>
    <description><![CDATA[<p style="text-align: center"><img class="alignnone size-full wp-image-989 aligncenter" src="http://go635254.s3.amazonaws.com/gas2/files/2008/09/cow_oil_well.jpg" alt="" width="500" height="341" /></p>

<p>Yesterday the U.S. Senate voted to renew a <a href="http://redgreenandblue.org/2008/09/23/breaking-senate-passes-extensions-of-renewable-energy-tax-credits/" target="_blank">one year extension for renewable energy tax credits</a> <a href="http://biofuelsdigest.com/blog2/2008/09/24/us-senate-votes-to-extend-renewable-energy-tax-credit-eliminates-tyson-conocophillips-cleaner-diesel-credit/" target="_blank">worth $18 billion dollars</a>. Absent from the package was a tax credit aimed at helping food giant Tyson and oil giant ConocoPhillips turn a profit by converting fats leftover from Tyson&#8217;s processing of beef to the so-called &#8220;renewable diesel&#8221; that ConocoPhillips blends with regular diesel (for a look at what renewable diesel is, check out Jason Burroughs comment below).</p>
<p>The legislation enacts a $1 per gallon credit for <a href="http://gas2.org/2008/04/10/biodiesel-mythbuster-20-twenty-two-biodiesel-myths-dispelled/">biodiesel</a> production, but the &#8220;renewable diesel&#8221; made from waste fat, or tallow, would only be eligible for a 50 cent per gallon credit. <a href="http://money.cnn.com/news/newsfeeds/articles/djf500/200809221646DOWJONESDJONLINE000612_FORTUNE5.htm" target="_blank">According to Tyson and ConocoPhillips, without the $1 per gallon credit for making &#8220;renewable diesel&#8221; from tallow, their proposed project is a no go</a>.</p>
<p><a href="http://gas2.org/2008/09/24/us-government-axes-biodiesel-from-waste-tax-credit/" class="more-link">Read more of this story &#187;</a></p>
]]></description>
    <wfw:commentRss>http://gas2.org/2008/09/24/us-government-axes-biodiesel-from-waste-tax-credit/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>Refined Refinery? ConocoPhillips in Billings, MT</title>
    <link>http://cleantechnica.com/2008/07/02/conocophillips-refinery/</link>
    <comments>http://cleantechnica.com/2008/07/02/conocophillips-refinery/#comments</comments>
    <pubDate>Wed, 02 Jul 2008 17:59:21 +0000</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Courtney Carlisle</dc:creator>
    
		<category><![CDATA[energy efficiency]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[fossil fuels]]></category>

    <guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/2008/07/02/conocophillips-refinery/</guid>
    <description><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://cleantechnica.com/files/2008/07/refinery.jpg"><img class="alignleft size-full wp-image-619" src="http://go635254.s3.amazonaws.com/cleantechnica/files/2008/07/refinery.jpg" alt="ConocoPhillips in Billing, MT" width="144" height="192" /></a>Billings, MT plays host to three petroleum refineries, which fuel the local economy.  I was fortunate to receive an invitation from the American Petroleum Institute to come out as their guest and tour the ConocoPhillips refinery and meet a few of the local citizens to hear their thoughts on big oil.</p>
<p>Out of the three refineries located in Billings, one has a very unique story and position in the world of refining. The ConocoPhillips refinery is the first Energy Star certified refinery in the world (two years in a row). Not bad for an industry that is not highly regarded in public opinion given the current prices we are paying at the pump, but sustainability and environmental factors actually rank very high on the list of priorities for this tightly run operation.</p>
<p>Not only is ConocoPhillips the most energy efficient and least polluting out of the three, it was also the first to form a Citizen&#8217;s Advisory Council comprised of community members unafraid to speak up about their concerns with having a refinery located in town - the most prevalent, of course, being air quality control.</p>
<p>Stepping off of the plane (from LA granted), the air in Montana is crisp and clear, which is amazing given the fact that there are <em>three </em>refineries that are emitting sulfur and CO2 among other elements into the air. However, even walking around the Conoco plant, it was hard to smell any evidence of &#8220;refining&#8221; going on. The community members that I got to speak with (including Stella of local <a href="http://maps.google.com/maps?ie=UTF-8&#38;oe=utf-8&#38;rls=org.mozilla:en-US:official&#38;client=firefox-a&#38;um=1&#38;q=stella,&#38;near=Billings,+MT&#38;fb=1&#38;view=text&#38;latlng=261585401164547223">Stella&#8217;s Kitchen and Bakery fame</a>) excessively praised the efforts of the Conoco team for this reason and for the EPA air quality reports (which I&#8217;ll post on later) showing ConocoPhillips leading the pack in terms of lowest amounts of Sulfur Dioxide and other irritants.
<p><a href="http://cleantechnica.com/2008/07/02/conocophillips-refinery/" class="more-link">Read more of this story &#187;</a></p>
]]></description>
    <wfw:commentRss>http://cleantechnica.com/2008/07/02/conocophillips-refinery/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
  </item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- 230 queries in 0.885 seconds. -->