<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
  xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
  xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
  xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
>

<channel>
  <title>Green Options &#187; Consumer Products</title>
  <link>http://greenoptions.com/tag/consumer-products</link>
  <description>Posts tagged 'Consumer Products'</description>
  <pubDate>Tue, 08 Jan 2008 22:25:07 +0000</pubDate>
  <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
  <language>en</language>
  <item>
    <title>Organic Lotions Go Glam &#38; Luxurious</title>
    <link>http://ecopreneurist.com/2008/01/08/organic-lotions-go-glam-luxurious/</link>
    <comments>http://ecopreneurist.com/2008/01/08/organic-lotions-go-glam-luxurious/#comments</comments>
    <pubDate>Tue, 08 Jan 2008 22:25:07 +0000</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Leah Edwards</dc:creator>
    
		<category><![CDATA[business]]></category>

    <guid isPermaLink="false">http://ecopreneurist.com/2008/01/08/organic-lotions-go-glam-luxurious/</guid>
    <description><![CDATA[<p>It goes without saying that green is big these days. Within walking distance of my home there are three “eco-friendly” clothing boutiques, a “green home” shop and a billboard advertising green home cleaners. All have gone up in the last year. Ecopreneurists are birthing all sorts of green businesses, which is great to see.</p>
<p>As happy as I am to see all of these green youngsters on the block, it does my heart a lot of good to see green businesses that were started five or ten years ago, when green was not so hip, get a big boost from all of media attention now turned on all things green.</p>
<p>One example is <a href="http://www.pharmacopia.net">Pharmacopia</a> which was started in 1999. When the hot thing in entrpreneurism was launching a dot-com, Lisa Levin was quietly blending her own lotions and soaps from essential oils and organic ingredients. Lisa first gained a significant market presence for Pharmacopia products in natural products shops, with the Company eventually getting distribution in Whole Foods and other larger natural food stores. <img src="http://ecopreneurist.com/files/2008/01/products.gif" alt="Pharmacopia products" /></p>
<p><!--more-->Fortunately, intuition and personal taste had led Lisa, who designed the company’s identity and packaging herself, to make everything about Pharmacopia as elegant as the high-quality ingredients she uses in Pharmacopia’s line of body care products. Day spas and pampering have become a major retail and hospitality trend, and Pharmacopia is perfectly suited for spas and boutique hotels, such as the Delano boutique hotel in South Beach. As Lisa says, “We can either focus on the fact that we use only pure essential oils and organic ingredients or that we provide a really luxurious product.”</p>
<p>Pharmacopia is now well positioned for the increase in green consciousness.  One of the first ways people become concerned about organics and natural products is when considering what to put in and on their body. True pampering now requires the safest and most natural ingredients possible.</p>
<p>And it doesn’t hurt that green is IN. A list of <a href="http://www.pharmacopia.net/store/pages.php?pageid=23">celebrity Pharmacopia clients</a> and high-profile media placements shows how start-studded and high-profile, going green has gone.</p>
<p>Pharmacopia is not just for Grape Nuts eaters anymore. Company President Andreliz Bautista says, “People are interested in green even if their whole lives aren’t focused on it. Green options are what people need.”</p>
<p>P.S. For a related discussion of green or organic body care choices, please see a <a href="http://ecochildsplay.com/2008/01/06/how-big-is-still-green/#more-522">post</a> on our sister blog, Eco Child&#8217;s Play.</p>
]]></description>
    <content:encoded><![CDATA[It goes without saying that green is big these days. Within walking distance of my home there are three “eco-friendly” clothing boutiques, a “green home” shop and a billboard advertising green home cleaners. All have gone up in the last year. Ecopreneurists are birthing all sorts of green businesses, which is great to see.

As happy as I am to see all of these green youngsters on the block, it does my heart a lot of good to see green businesses that were started five or ten years ago, when green was not so hip, get a big boost from all of media attention now turned on all things green.

One example is Pharmacopia [1] which was started in 1999. When the hot thing in entrpreneurism was launching a dot-com, Lisa Levin was quietly blending her own lotions and soaps from essential oils and organic ingredients. Lisa first gained a significant market presence for Pharmacopia products in natural products shops, with the Company eventually getting distribution in Whole Foods and other larger natural food stores. 

Fortunately, intuition and personal taste had led Lisa, who designed the company’s identity and packaging herself, to make everything about Pharmacopia as elegant as the high-quality ingredients she uses in Pharmacopia’s line of body care products. Day spas and pampering have become a major retail and hospitality trend, and Pharmacopia is perfectly suited for spas and boutique hotels, such as the Delano boutique hotel in South Beach. As Lisa says, “We can either focus on the fact that we use only pure essential oils and organic ingredients or that we provide a really luxurious product.”

Pharmacopia is now well positioned for the increase in green consciousness.  One of the first ways people become concerned about organics and natural products is when considering what to put in and on their body. True pampering now requires the safest and most natural ingredients possible.

And it doesn’t hurt that green is IN. A list of celebrity Pharmacopia clients [2] and high-profile media placements shows how start-studded and high-profile, going green has gone.

Pharmacopia is not just for Grape Nuts eaters anymore. Company President Andreliz Bautista says, “People are interested in green even if their whole lives aren’t focused on it. Green options are what people need.”

P.S. For a related discussion of green or organic body care choices, please see a post [3] on our sister blog, Eco Child's Play.

[1] http://www.pharmacopia.net
[2] http://www.pharmacopia.net/store/pages.php?pageid=23
[3] http://ecochildsplay.com/2008/01/06/how-big-is-still-green/#more-522]]></content:encoded>
    <wfw:commentRss>http://ecopreneurist.com/2008/01/08/organic-lotions-go-glam-luxurious/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>Good News &#8212; Maybe &#8212; for Green-Collar Workers</title>
    <link>http://shirleysilukgregory.greenoptions.com/2007/11/06/good-news-maybe-for-green-collar-workers/</link>
    <comments>http://shirleysilukgregory.greenoptions.com/2007/11/06/good-news-maybe-for-green-collar-workers/#comments</comments>
    <pubDate>Tue, 06 Nov 2007 20:50:06 +0000</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Shirley Siluk Gregory</dc:creator>
    
		<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Energy]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[cleantechnica]]></category>

    <guid isPermaLink="false">http://shirleysilukgregory.greenoptions.com/2007/11/06/good-news-maybe-for-green-collar-workers/</guid>
    <description><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://shirleysilukgregory.greenoptions.com/files/2007/11/solarpanelbp.jpg" title="Solar panel"><img src="http://shirleysilukgregory.greenoptions.com/files/2007/11/solarpanelbp.jpg" alt="Solar panel" /></a>There&#8217;s good news for the future of green-collar employment, but it comes with a caveat: maximizing job growth in green industries will require the right public policy support. That means law-makers need to approve measures such as a renewable portfolio standard, incentives for renewable energy, public education programs and adequate funding for research and development.</p>
<p>If such measures are put in place, the U.S. could see as many as one out of every four workers employed by a renewable-energy or energy-efficiency industry by 2030, according to a <a href="http://www.ases.org/press/2007_jobs_report.htm">new report </a>from the American Solar Energy Society (ASES). That&#8217;s promising for both U.S. employees and for anyone concerned about reducing greenhouse gas emissions and our dependence on fossil fuels. But it will happen only, as the ASES report says, under &#8220;an aggressive deployment forecast scenario.&#8221;</p>
<p>That means we, as citizens and consumers, are going to have to apply strong and steady pressure on legislators &#8212; local, state and national &#8212; to do the right thing. And that, we all know, isn&#8217;t easy.</p>
<p>Still, if &#8212; as the saying goes &#8212; money walks, green-collar types might see Beltway support grow as green industries expand their economic muscle, which means more dollars for lobbying and campaign financing. And, in that regard, the future looks bright.</p>
<p>In the U.S., renewable-energy and energy-efficiency industries are already generating 8.5 million jobs and nearly $970 billion in annual revenues, according to the ASES report. &#8220;To put this in perspective,&#8221; the report states, &#8220;(t)otal sales for Wal-Mart, Exxon-Mobil and General Motors in 2006 were $905 billion.&#8221;</p>
<p>While companies on the energy-efficiency side &#8212; things like better windows, efficient appliances and insulation &#8212; are making more of the money right now, the renewables side is growing more rapidly.</p>
<p>The ASES predicts the hottest, fastest-growing industries will involve solar power, wind energy, ethanol and fuel-cell technologies. With the right level of public support, it says, we could see up to 40 million people employed &#8212; as everything from accountants and biochemists to engineers, mechanics and truck drivers &#8212; in the renewable-energy and energy-efficiency sectors by 2030, with annual green-industry revenues of $4.5 trillion.</p>
<p>Getting there, though, will require much more than a business-as-usual approach, the ASES report warns.</p>
<p>&#8220;This scenario requires appropriate, aggressive, sustained public policies at the federal and state level during next two decades,&#8221; it states. Getting decision-makers to come on board might take oil shortages, fossil-fuel price increases, growing security concerns or a greater awareness of the impact of climate change. The fear of suffering economically at a global level might also be a motivator.</p>
<p>&#8220;If we fail to invest in (renewable energy and energy efficiency), the United States runs the risk of losing ground to international &#8230; programs and industries,&#8221; the report concludes. &#8220;For the United States to be competitive in a carbon-constrained world, the (renewable energy and energy efficiency) industry will be a critical economic driver.&#8221;</p>
]]></description>
    <content:encoded><![CDATA[ [1]There's good news for the future of green-collar employment, but it comes with a caveat: maximizing job growth in green industries will require the right public policy support. That means law-makers need to approve measures such as a renewable portfolio standard, incentives for renewable energy, public education programs and adequate funding for research and development.

If such measures are put in place, the U.S. could see as many as one out of every four workers employed by a renewable-energy or energy-efficiency industry by 2030, according to a new report  [2]from the American Solar Energy Society (ASES). That's promising for both U.S. employees and for anyone concerned about reducing greenhouse gas emissions and our dependence on fossil fuels. But it will happen only, as the ASES report says, under "an aggressive deployment forecast scenario."

That means we, as citizens and consumers, are going to have to apply strong and steady pressure on legislators -- local, state and national -- to do the right thing. And that, we all know, isn't easy.

Still, if -- as the saying goes -- money walks, green-collar types might see Beltway support grow as green industries expand their economic muscle, which means more dollars for lobbying and campaign financing. And, in that regard, the future looks bright.

In the U.S., renewable-energy and energy-efficiency industries are already generating 8.5 million jobs and nearly $970 billion in annual revenues, according to the ASES report. "To put this in perspective," the report states, "(t)otal sales for Wal-Mart, Exxon-Mobil and General Motors in 2006 were $905 billion."

While companies on the energy-efficiency side -- things like better windows, efficient appliances and insulation -- are making more of the money right now, the renewables side is growing more rapidly.

The ASES predicts the hottest, fastest-growing industries will involve solar power, wind energy, ethanol and fuel-cell technologies. With the right level of public support, it says, we could see up to 40 million people employed -- as everything from accountants and biochemists to engineers, mechanics and truck drivers -- in the renewable-energy and energy-efficiency sectors by 2030, with annual green-industry revenues of $4.5 trillion.

Getting there, though, will require much more than a business-as-usual approach, the ASES report warns.

"This scenario requires appropriate, aggressive, sustained public policies at the federal and state level during next two decades," it states. Getting decision-makers to come on board might take oil shortages, fossil-fuel price increases, growing security concerns or a greater awareness of the impact of climate change. The fear of suffering economically at a global level might also be a motivator.

"If we fail to invest in (renewable energy and energy efficiency), the United States runs the risk of losing ground to international ... programs and industries," the report concludes. "For the United States to be competitive in a carbon-constrained world, the (renewable energy and energy efficiency) industry will be a critical economic driver."

[1] http://shirleysilukgregory.greenoptions.com/files/2007/11/solarpanelbp.jpg
[2] http://www.ases.org/press/2007_jobs_report.htm]]></content:encoded>
    <wfw:commentRss>http://shirleysilukgregory.greenoptions.com/2007/11/06/good-news-maybe-for-green-collar-workers/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>Save Money and Energy on Christmas Lights this Year</title>
    <link>http://phil.greenoptions.com/2007/11/04/save-money-and-energy-on-christmas-lights-this-year/</link>
    <comments>http://phil.greenoptions.com/2007/11/04/save-money-and-energy-on-christmas-lights-this-year/#comments</comments>
    <pubDate>Sun, 04 Nov 2007 16:23:49 +0000</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Philip C. Curtis</dc:creator>
    
		<category><![CDATA[Energy]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[cleantechnica]]></category>

    <guid isPermaLink="false">http://phil.greenoptions.com/2007/11/04/save-money-and-energy-on-christmas-lights-this-year/</guid>
    <description><![CDATA[<p>Halloween is over and even though the trees still have green leaves because of the mild fall we are having, Christmas is just around the corner.  Americans consume a lot of extra energy and create and extraordinary amount of waste during the holidays.  In fact, it is estimated that we produce more than 1 million extra tons of garbage each week from the period between Thanksgiving and Halloween.</p>
<p>We also consume a great amount of energy.  This is partly because this is one of the darkest times of year but its also because people are using more electricity to light up their homes with holiday decorations.  Incandescent Christmas lights are inefficient and won&#8217;t last very long.  They also break very easily.  LED technology has found its way into the world of <a href="http://www.holidayleds.com">Christmas lights</a> and is much more efficient.  Specifically, <a href="http://www.holidayleds.com">LED Christmas lights</a> use about 90% less energy than standard incandescent lights and will last for more than 50,000 hours.  The bulbs are also covered with a durable epoxy plastic so they won&#8217;t break.</p>
<p>This year pay attention to you consumption during the holidays and do what you can to reduce your energy consumption.</p>
]]></description>
    <content:encoded><![CDATA[Halloween is over and even though the trees still have green leaves because of the mild fall we are having, Christmas is just around the corner.  Americans consume a lot of extra energy and create and extraordinary amount of waste during the holidays.  In fact, it is estimated that we produce more than 1 million extra tons of garbage each week from the period between Thanksgiving and Halloween.

We also consume a great amount of energy.  This is partly because this is one of the darkest times of year but its also because people are using more electricity to light up their homes with holiday decorations.  Incandescent Christmas lights are inefficient and won't last very long.  They also break very easily.  LED technology has found its way into the world of Christmas lights [1] and is much more efficient.  Specifically, LED Christmas lights [2] use about 90% less energy than standard incandescent lights and will last for more than 50,000 hours.  The bulbs are also covered with a durable epoxy plastic so they won't break.

This year pay attention to you consumption during the holidays and do what you can to reduce your energy consumption.

[1] http://www.holidayleds.com
[2] http://www.holidayleds.com]]></content:encoded>
    <wfw:commentRss>http://phil.greenoptions.com/2007/11/04/save-money-and-energy-on-christmas-lights-this-year/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>Eco-Effective Concepts: Energy Generating T-shirts</title>
    <link>http://elizabethredmond.greenoptions.com/2007/10/31/eco-effective-concepts-energy-generating-t-shirts/</link>
    <comments>http://elizabethredmond.greenoptions.com/2007/10/31/eco-effective-concepts-energy-generating-t-shirts/#comments</comments>
    <pubDate>Wed, 31 Oct 2007 20:46:45 +0000</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Elizabeth Redmond</dc:creator>
    
		<category><![CDATA[Automobiles]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Consumer Products]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Eco-Entrepreneurs]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Fashion and Apparel]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Green Tech]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Health and Health Products]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Physics and Engineering]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Transportation]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[alternative+energy]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[australia]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[cleantechnica]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[energy+generation]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[piezoelectricity]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[wearables]]></category>

    <guid isPermaLink="false">http://elizabethredmond.greenoptions.com/2007/10/31/eco-effective-concepts-energy-generating-t-shirts/</guid>
    <description><![CDATA[<p>
<img src="/files/669/EnergyHarvestingBackpack.png" alt="" width="220" height="262" align="right" />A research team with the <a href="http://www.csiro.au/">CSIRO (Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organization)</a> in Australia is working on a project to integrate energy-generating materials into our clothing.  By simply collecting the energy in our movement, vibrations, and friction, our clothing could create enough juice to power up our mobile phone, mp3 player, etc.  The Australian Defense Department awarded the team of researchers a $4.4 million grant to deem the technology feasible.   
</p>
<p>
Dr Adam Best, project leader and employee of the <a href="http://www.csiro.au/science/energygeneration.html">CSIRO Energy Technology Division</a> &#34;predicts that the first power shirts - or flexible energy devices- could be developed within five years,&#34; states a <a href="http://www.smh.com.au/news/technology/speak-to-the-collar-the-shirts-playing-its-own-tune/2007/10/26/1192941339431.html"><em>Sydney Morning Herald</em> report</a>.  Their concept includes the technology of <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Piezoelectricity">piezoelectrics</a> as the energy generating material.  This popularly researched material produces a charge displacement when it is flexed.  It naturally occurs in soft chrystalline structures like quartz, and Rochelle salts.  
</p>
<p>
The idea is to develop a fabric woven with piezoelectric material so that any movement on, in, or around your body would stimulate the fiber to generate power.   The clothing would be woven with flexible batteries that could act as storage unit series for your devices.  The next step is to figure out how to wirelessly transmit that power collected in your t-shirt  to your mobile phone without damaging your body due to intense exposure to electro-magnetic fields.</p>]]></description>
    <content:encoded><![CDATA[ A research team with the CSIRO (Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organization) [1] in Australia is working on a project to integrate energy-generating materials into our clothing.  By simply collecting the energy in our movement, vibrations, and friction, our clothing could create enough juice to power up our mobile phone, mp3 player, etc.  The Australian Defense Department awarded the team of researchers a $4.4 million grant to deem the technology feasible.

Dr Adam Best, project leader and employee of the CSIRO Energy Technology Division [2] "predicts that the first power shirts - or flexible energy devices- could be developed within five years," states a Sydney Morning Herald report [3].  Their concept includes the technology of piezoelectrics [4] as the energy generating material.  This popularly researched material produces a charge displacement when it is flexed.  It naturally occurs in soft chrystalline structures like quartz, and Rochelle salts.

The idea is to develop a fabric woven with piezoelectric material so that any movement on, in, or around your body would stimulate the fiber to generate power.   The clothing would be woven with flexible batteries that could act as storage unit series for your devices.  The next step is to figure out how to wirelessly transmit that power collected in your t-shirt  to your mobile phone without damaging your body due to intense exposure to electro-magnetic fields.

Dr. Best believes that the development of this concept could revolutionize the form and usage of daily appliances. "With printable flexible circuit boards, the day may not be far off when people could make phone calls simply by talking into their collars."

Interestingly, defense programs and departments are commonly funding projects that develop the potential for remote electrical energy generation.  The Australian Defense Department sees this as an opportunity to power "back-to-base" medical monitoring equipment, radios, and other such powered devices used in the field.  As it could revolutionize battle in the field, it could also serve as a highly effective tool in field research and remote backpacking trips to power gps devices, emergency radios, data recording and transmittance devices…



There are many similar ideas out there along the lines of energy generating wearables.  A collaboration team with members from Michigan Technological University, Arizona State, and NanoSonic, Inc., is developing a backpack [5] with piezoelectric fibers integrated into the straps.  Alberto Villarreal [6], a young San Francisco-based designer, has gained recognition for a concept shoe [7] that harnesses electricity from your step.   With the development of these concepts into real products we could be actively moving towards an energy revolution.

[1] http://www.csiro.au/
[2] http://www.csiro.au/science/energygeneration.html
[3] http://www.smh.com.au/news/technology/speak-to-the-collar-the-shirts-playing-its-own-tune/2007/10/26/1192941339431.html
[4] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Piezoelectricity
[5] http://www.physorg.com/news108897656.html
[6] http://www.zanicdesign.com/html/brightwalk1.htm
[7] http://pruned.blogspot.com/2007/05/piezo-array.html]]></content:encoded>
    <wfw:commentRss>http://elizabethredmond.greenoptions.com/2007/10/31/eco-effective-concepts-energy-generating-t-shirts/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>Reduce Children&#8217;s Exposure to Toxins: New DVD</title>
    <link>http://kellibestoliver.greenoptions.com/2007/10/30/reduce-childrens-exposure-to-toxins-new-dvd/</link>
    <comments>http://kellibestoliver.greenoptions.com/2007/10/30/reduce-childrens-exposure-to-toxins-new-dvd/#comments</comments>
    <pubDate>Tue, 30 Oct 2007 14:03:14 +0000</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Kelli Best-Oliver</dc:creator>
    
		<category><![CDATA[Activism]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Beauty]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Books]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Community]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Consumer Products]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Education]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Environment]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Family]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Film]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Food]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Health and Health Products]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Healthy Child]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Home and Interior]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Media]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Organic food]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Recreation]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Shaklee Foundation]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[dvd]]></category>

    <guid isPermaLink="false">http://kellibestoliver.greenoptions.com/2007/10/30/reduce-childrens-exposure-to-toxins-new-dvd/</guid>
    <description><![CDATA[<p>
<img src="/files/110/healthychild.gif" alt="" width="200" height="124" align="right" />Many green parents (and doctors) have long thought that increased exposure to environmental toxins can lead to childhood diseases such as asthma, cancers, birth defects, and developmental disorders.  CNN.com <a href="http://www.cnn.com/2007/TECH/science/10/22/body.burden/index.html?iref=newssearch">even ran a story last week</a> about industrial chemical buildup in children's bloodstreams.  Now, the <a href="http://www.shaklee.com">Shaklee Foundation</a> and <a href="http://www.healthychild.org">HealthyChild.org</a> have teamed up to produce a new DVD that provides information for parents, teachers, school administrators, and child care professionals on five easy steps to create healthy environments for children.
</p>
<p>
<em>Creating Healthy Environments for Children</em> features <em>Private Practice</em>'s Amy Brenneman as host with Ben Harper providing music.  Pediatricians Dr. Philip Landrigan and Dr. Alan Greene provide their expertise, as well.  Their five major tips include:
</p>
<ul>
	<li>Avoid using pesticides</li>
	<li>Clean safely</li>
	<li>Help children breathe easier</li>
	<li>Provide healthy food</li>
	<li>Use plastic products wisely.</li>
</ul>
<p>
Pop the DVD in your computers, and you'll find three tool kits, one each for home, child care centers, and schools, that provide resources for making each environment safer for children.  The tool kits also give advice for community outreach and activism on safer environments for children.</p>]]></description>
    <content:encoded><![CDATA[
Many green parents (and doctors) have long thought that increased exposure to environmental toxins can lead to childhood diseases such as asthma, cancers, birth defects, and developmental disorders.  CNN.com even ran a story last week [1] about industrial chemical buildup in children's bloodstreams.  Now, the Shaklee Foundation [2] and HealthyChild.org [3] have teamed up to produce a new DVD that provides information for parents, teachers, school administrators, and child care professionals on five easy steps to create healthy environments for children.


Creating Healthy Environments for Children features Private Practice's Amy Brenneman as host with Ben Harper providing music.  Pediatricians Dr. Philip Landrigan and Dr. Alan Greene provide their expertise, as well.  Their five major tips include:


	Avoid using pesticides
	Clean safely
	Help children breathe easier
	Provide healthy food
	Use plastic products wisely.


Pop the DVD in your computers, and you'll find three tool kits, one each for home, child care centers, and schools, that provide resources for making each environment safer for children.  The tool kits also give advice for community outreach and activism on safer environments for children.


The DVD will be released in November and retails for $12.95. More information can be found on HealthyChild.org's website [4].  HealthyChild.org is also releasing a similar book Healthy Child, Healthy World, in March of 2008



[1] http://www.cnn.com/2007/TECH/science/10/22/body.burden/index.html?iref=newssearch
[2] http://www.shaklee.com
[3] http://www.healthychild.org
[4] http://www.healthychild.org]]></content:encoded>
    <wfw:commentRss>http://kellibestoliver.greenoptions.com/2007/10/30/reduce-childrens-exposure-to-toxins-new-dvd/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>Green Building Elements: Building Controls</title>
    <link>http://greenbuildingelements.com/2007/10/24/green-building-elements-building-controls/</link>
    <comments>http://greenbuildingelements.com/2007/10/24/green-building-elements-building-controls/#comments</comments>
    <pubDate>Wed, 24 Oct 2007 20:06:20 +0000</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Philip Proefrock</dc:creator>
    
		<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

    <guid isPermaLink="false">http://philipproefrock.greenoptions.com/2007/10/24/green-building-elements-building-controls/</guid>
    <description><![CDATA[<p>
<img src="/files/111/613px-Honeywell_thermostat.jpg" alt="wikimedia" width="249" height="244" align="right" />For all our technological advances, our buildings remain incredibly dumb constructions.  Automobiles have multiple onboard computers that help maximize their performance and improve efficiency and coordinate the various systems.  But the average house has very little, if any, control to aid in its operation despite the wide range of conditions (from below freezing winter nights to scorching summer days) they are forced to deal with.  Even large, complex buildings operate with fairly minimal control systems.  Yet we expect them to provide a standard comfortable environment for us year round.
</p>
<p>
We need some smarter building controls.
</p>
<p>
Some building controls are already available.  The oldest and best known is the simple thermostat.  A thermometer control that turns on heating or cooling, depending on the temperature.  It doesn't do much, but it does help to regulate furnaces and air conditioners to keep the temperature within a range of few degrees.  But, temperature is not the only factor in comfort.  Reducing the humidity can sometimes be all that is needed in warm weather.  If the temperature is not too hot, the cooling effect of a breeze may be better than running an air conditioner.  But a thermostat can't do that for you.</p>]]></description>
    <content:encoded><![CDATA[ For all our technological advances, our buildings remain incredibly dumb constructions.  Automobiles have multiple onboard computers that help maximize their performance and improve efficiency and coordinate the various systems.  But the average house has very little, if any, control to aid in its operation despite the wide range of conditions (from below freezing winter nights to scorching summer days) they are forced to deal with.  Even large, complex buildings operate with fairly minimal control systems.  Yet we expect them to provide a standard comfortable environment for us year round.

We need some smarter building controls.

 Some building controls are already available.  The oldest and best known is the simple thermostat.  A thermometer control that turns on heating or cooling, depending on the temperature.  It doesn't do much, but it does help to regulate furnaces and air conditioners to keep the temperature within a range of few degrees.  But, temperature is not the only factor in comfort.  Reducing the humidity can sometimes be all that is needed in warm weather.  If the temperature is not too hot, the cooling effect of a breeze may be better than running an air conditioner.  But a thermostat can't do that for you.

Light sensors are another control that can be beneficial.  When daylight is sufficient for lighting a space, the control turns off lights in the space.  (More sophisticated systems gradually lower the light level rather than abruptly switching the lights off and on, and can sometimes be completely unnoticed by the occupants of a space.)  Sometimes, though, even daylight can be glaring.

Room occupancy sensors are becoming more commonplace.  For infrequently occupied rooms, they can be quite useful.  My office has a sensor wall switch in our library which only cost $20 or so.  It's convenient for us, too, because the light switch is in an awkward location.  Now, you just walk in and the lights come on.  The sensor also has a manual override, so it is possible to turn the lights off (as we do when we use our wall projector for presentations).

All of these systems are reactive, however.

As autumn advances, we've had very hot days around here recently, but it has been getting very cool at night.  The air conditioning was on in my office the other afternoon.  But an hour later, we were all headed home for the evening, and the next morning, it was cold in the office when I came in.  Letting the temperature float a bit in the afternoon would have been a better approach, and just let the building cool down on its own overnight.

There is a lot of room for developments in making homes more sophisticated without requiring everyone to become a building engineer.  As we push for increasingly efficient operation of our homes and buildings, this kind of advance is going to need to become commonplace.  But there's no perceived market for it yet, so it remains a lagging field without much development taking place.

Some systems for home automation are available.  The X10 standard for controlling devices allows a wide range of controls to be operated from a computer.  But these are still very much seen as high-end luxury options, rather than basic components that should be incorporated into every home.

Inexpensive, user-friendly building control systems that increase the level of sophistication for our buildings is a field that holds great potential.]]></content:encoded>
    <wfw:commentRss>http://greenbuildingelements.com/2007/10/24/green-building-elements-building-controls/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>Green Family Values:  A Fair Trade, Alternative Halloween</title>
    <link>http://jenniferlance.greenoptions.com/2007/10/24/green-family-values-a-fair-trade-alternative-halloween/</link>
    <comments>http://jenniferlance.greenoptions.com/2007/10/24/green-family-values-a-fair-trade-alternative-halloween/#comments</comments>
    <pubDate>Wed, 24 Oct 2007 14:18:13 +0000</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Jennifer Lance</dc:creator>
    
		<category><![CDATA[Health]]></category>

    <guid isPermaLink="false">http://jenniferlance.greenoptions.com/2007/10/24/green-family-values-a-fair-trade-alternative-halloween/</guid>
    <description><![CDATA[<p>
<img src="/files/373/100_0572.jpg" alt="" width="216" height="179" align="right" />
Halloween is one week away, and the blogosphere has erupted in green Halloween posts.  From <a href="http://www.thegreenguide.com/doc/122/candy">The Green Guide</a> to <a href="http://ecochildsplay.blogspot.com/2007/10/have-happy-green-halloween.html">Eco Child's Play</a>, everyone is writing about having an eco-friendly, ghoulish good time.  Green Halloween has also been a hot topic lately on Green Options:
</p>
<ul>
	<li><a href="/2007/10/15/daily_tip_halloween_with_less_waste">Daily Tip:  Halloween with Less Waste</a>, </li>
	<li><a href="/2007/10/15/daily_tip_halloween_with_less_waste">Green Style How-To:  Supermarket and No-Sew Halloween Costumes</a>, </li>
	<li><a href="/2007/10/09/five_super_simple_steps_to_green_trick_or_treating">Five Super-Simple Steps to Green Trick-or-Treating</a>, </li>
	<li><a href="/2007/10/10/daily_tip_wholesome_sweets">Daily Tip: Wholesome Sweets</a> </li>
</ul>
<p>
By now you may be groaning, &#34;Oh no, not another green Halloween post about making your own costume and giving out pencils,&#34; yet this green idea flips the holiday over on the concept of Fair Trade.
</p>
<p>
Think about Fair Trade in the simplest terms, as a young child may define it.  If I give you something, in exchange you will give me something of equal value, whether monetary or not.  For example, children trading marbles will exclaim, &#34;That is not fair,&#34; if they do not view the marble exchange as equitable.   In a child's mind, Halloween is not an equitable trade... they make out like bandits while trick-or-treating!  All they have to do is sport a costume and knock on their neighbors' doors to receive lots and lots of candy!  It is definitely not a Fair Trade! Global Exchange proposes a change to this custom by promoting <a href="http://www.globalexchange.org/campaigns/fairtrade/cocoa/reversetrickortreating/">&#34;reverse&#34; trick-or-treating</a>.</p>]]></description>
    <content:encoded><![CDATA[

Halloween is one week away, and the blogosphere has erupted in green Halloween posts.  From The Green Guide [1] to Eco Child's Play [2], everyone is writing about having an eco-friendly, ghoulish good time.  Green Halloween has also been a hot topic lately on Green Options:


	Daily Tip:  Halloween with Less Waste [3], 
	Green Style How-To:  Supermarket and No-Sew Halloween Costumes [4], 
	Five Super-Simple Steps to Green Trick-or-Treating [5], 
	Daily Tip: Wholesome Sweets [6] 


By now you may be groaning, &#34;Oh no, not another green Halloween post about making your own costume and giving out pencils,&#34; yet this green idea flips the holiday over on the concept of Fair Trade.


Think about Fair Trade in the simplest terms, as a young child may define it.  If I give you something, in exchange you will give me something of equal value, whether monetary or not.  For example, children trading marbles will exclaim, &#34;That is not fair,&#34; if they do not view the marble exchange as equitable.   In a child's mind, Halloween is not an equitable trade... they make out like bandits while trick-or-treating!  All they have to do is sport a costume and knock on their neighbors' doors to receive lots and lots of candy!  It is definitely not a Fair Trade! Global Exchange proposes a change to this custom by promoting &#34;reverse&#34; trick-or-treating [7].


Reverse trick-or-treating is an educational campaign aimed at informing households about the &#34;social justice issues in the cocoa industry, and how Fair Trade certified chocolate works to end poverty.&#34;  Families participate by knocking on their neighbors' doors and giving them Fair Trade chocolate.  Instead of only receiving sweet treats, children get to give them out, too.  It's a fair trade.  The Fair Trade chocolate is accompanied by flyers explaining how Fair Trade benefits children in cocoa farming communities. One flyer [8] includes a letter of protest to the CEO of World's Finest Chocolate and a letter for parents to give to their children's teachers about Fair Trade curriculum. Another flyer [9] states,


	Despite six years of promises from major chocolate manufacturers, little has been done to tackle the documented problem of forced child labor on many farms that supply their cocoa. Moreover, low cocoa prices have left cocoa farmers in poverty year after year. There is a SOLUTION, and all you have to do is eat chocolate!


Even though the deadline to officially sign up for Equal Exchange's reverse trick-or-treating has passed, you can still participate in your own campaign and report your results.  Imagine the look on your neighbors' faces when your costumed children give them Fair Trade chocolate!  I propose that children can still receive goodies while reverse trick-or-treating, thus I think the term &#34;exchange&#34; trick-or-treating offers a better description of the activity.  Goodies for adults may be different than treats for children, but the idea of fairly trading goods on this holiday instead of the one-way giving of tradition is an interesting idea.  Unless we put the &#34;trick&#34; back into trick-or-treating, exchange trick-or-treating offers a great solution for turning Halloween into a socially responsible holiday.



[1] http://www.thegreenguide.com/doc/122/candy
[2] http://ecochildsplay.blogspot.com/2007/10/have-happy-green-halloween.html
[3] http://jenniferlance.greenoptions.com/2007/10/15/daily_tip_halloween_with_less_waste
[4] http://jenniferlance.greenoptions.com/2007/10/15/daily_tip_halloween_with_less_waste
[5] http://jenniferlance.greenoptions.com/2007/10/09/five_super_simple_steps_to_green_trick_or_treating
[6] http://jenniferlance.greenoptions.com/2007/10/10/daily_tip_wholesome_sweets
[7] http://www.globalexchange.org/campaigns/fairtrade/cocoa/reversetrickortreating/
[8] http://www.globalexchange.org/campaigns/fairtrade/cocoa/GXHalloweenFlyer.pdf
[9] http://www.globalexchange.org/campaigns/fairtrade/cocoa/reversetrickortreating/RTTFlyer.pdf]]></content:encoded>
    <wfw:commentRss>http://jenniferlance.greenoptions.com/2007/10/24/green-family-values-a-fair-trade-alternative-halloween/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>Prohibited Green Technologies</title>
    <link>http://greenbuildingelements.com/2007/10/22/prohibited-green-technologies/</link>
    <comments>http://greenbuildingelements.com/2007/10/22/prohibited-green-technologies/#comments</comments>
    <pubDate>Mon, 22 Oct 2007 14:48:54 +0000</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Philip Proefrock</dc:creator>
    
		<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>

    <guid isPermaLink="false">http://philipproefrock.greenoptions.com/2007/10/22/prohibited-green-technologies/</guid>
    <description><![CDATA[<p>
<img src="/files/111/waterless_main.jpg" alt="" width="259" height="194" align="right" />
Green technologies make good sense to most of us, but incomplete or uncoordinated implementation can lead to circumstances where green technologies are not able to provide the full benefits that they can.  In some instances, regulatory requirements can even lead to making green technologies counterproductive.
</p>
<p>
Waterless urinals present one striking example of how regulations and green technology are not yet working together.  In some municipalities, waterless urinals have not been allowed by building inspectors because they do not meet code requirements.  Or, in some cases, building inspectors have allowed waterless urinals to be installed, but have required the builder to provide plumbing supply lines to bring water to the waterless urinal locations (though capped off and hidden behind the finished wall).  The rationale for this is that if the waterless urinals are later removed and replaced with conventional urinals, extensive renovation will not be necessary to bring water to the location.
</p>
<p>
This upsets many of the green benefits of using waterless urinals in the first place.  While waterless urinals provide water savings, that is not the only green benefit to incorporating them into a green building.  Waterless urinals, when installed without a water supply line, provide savings in materials by avoiding the installation of likely dozens of feet of water supply pipe.  Given the material cost, the high embodied energy content, and the extensive mineral use in mining, refining, and creating even ten feet of copper pipe, much of the savings from installing a waterless urinal is wiped out.  Because of this, it will take much longer to realize the savings that using a waterless urinal should provide.
</p>
]]></description>
    <content:encoded><![CDATA[ 
Green technologies make good sense to most of us, but incomplete or uncoordinated implementation can lead to circumstances where green technologies are not able to provide the full benefits that they can.  In some instances, regulatory requirements can even lead to making green technologies counterproductive.

 Waterless urinals present one striking example of how regulations and green technology are not yet working together.  In some municipalities, waterless urinals have not been allowed by building inspectors because they do not meet code requirements.  Or, in some cases, building inspectors have allowed waterless urinals to be installed, but have required the builder to provide plumbing supply lines to bring water to the waterless urinal locations (though capped off and hidden behind the finished wall).  The rationale for this is that if the waterless urinals are later removed and replaced with conventional urinals, extensive renovation will not be necessary to bring water to the location.

This upsets many of the green benefits of using waterless urinals in the first place.  While waterless urinals provide water savings, that is not the only green benefit to incorporating them into a green building.  Waterless urinals, when installed without a water supply line, provide savings in materials by avoiding the installation of likely dozens of feet of water supply pipe.  Given the material cost, the high embodied energy content, and the extensive mineral use in mining, refining, and creating even ten feet of copper pipe, much of the savings from installing a waterless urinal is wiped out.  Because of this, it will take much longer to realize the savings that using a waterless urinal should provide.



Another instance of conflict between regulatory requirements and green objectives is in trucking.  Canadian truck drivers recently met with federal officials to showcase "Envirotrucks."  These are trucks with features that can reduce smog and greenhouse gas emissions.
 	Technologies such as aerodynamic flaps make trucks more frugal with fuel. But the flaps stick out so the truck is longer than some provinces allow. One solution is to shorten the cargo section of the truck, but the trucking industry isn't willing to do that.
Shortening the cargo section means that trucks must carry a smaller load.  Savings from increased efficiency may be more than offset by a need for more truck trips to carry the same amount of cargo, and, though the individual trucks may be more efficient, making more trips does nothing to reduce the overall level of emissions.  More truck trips also add to road congestion, and magnify the adverse effects by slowing down the entire transport system.

Green technologies need to be incorporated into regulatory systems in a way that does not outweigh the potential benefits.  Otherwise, green improvements can be perceived as just expensive indulgences, rather than offering real gains.  Real progress comes not just from incremental, individual improvements, but when the larger systems are revised to allow the most appropriate and efficient systems to be properly used.

Link: CBC News [1]

Image source: Construction Resources [2] 

[1] http://www.cbc.ca/technology/story/2007/10/15/ot-green-trucks-071015.html?ref=rss
[2] http://www.constructionresources.com/products/Building%20services/waterless.htm]]></content:encoded>
    <wfw:commentRss>http://greenbuildingelements.com/2007/10/22/prohibited-green-technologies/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>Eco-Effective Design: Social Sustainability- Criteria for Good Design</title>
    <link>http://elizabethredmond.greenoptions.com/2007/10/19/eco-effective-design-social-sustainability-criteria-for-good-design/</link>
    <comments>http://elizabethredmond.greenoptions.com/2007/10/19/eco-effective-design-social-sustainability-criteria-for-good-design/#comments</comments>
    <pubDate>Fri, 19 Oct 2007 18:31:24 +0000</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Elizabeth Redmond</dc:creator>
    
		<category><![CDATA[Activism]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Architecture]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Climate Change]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Consumer Products]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Design]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Developing Nations]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Eco-Entrepreneurs]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Environment]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Green Building]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Green Tech]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Health and Health Products]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Media]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Social Entrepreneurship]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[TOMS+shoes]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[design+awards]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[design+can+change]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[good+magazine]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[social+sustainability]]></category>

    <guid isPermaLink="false">http://elizabethredmond.greenoptions.com/2007/10/19/eco-effective-design-social-sustainability-criteria-for-good-design/</guid>
    <description><![CDATA[<p>
<img src="/files/669/TOMS.jpg" alt="" width="350" height="197" align="right" />Last night, Thursday, October 18th, at the National Design Awards Gala in New York City was the announcement of the <a href="http://peoplesdesignaward.cooperhewitt.org/2007/">Peoples Design Awards</a>.   As part of National Design Week, <a href="http://www.cooperhewitt.org/">Copper-Hewitt</a> supports an annual competition where people nominate great design.
</p>
<p>
 Voting has been open to the public online since mid September.  As it is too late to cast your vote, it isn’t too late to congratulate the winner and find out what people consider excellence in design.  The most exciting part of this year’s ballot is that many of the nominees were for projects geared towards sustainable progress. Social sustainability is one of the most important attributes for the public to consider, our responsibility towards sustainability and global issues shows promise. 
</p>
<p></p>]]></description>
    <content:encoded><![CDATA[
Last night, Thursday, October 18th, at the National Design Awards Gala in New York City was the announcement of the Peoples Design Awards [1].   As part of National Design Week, Copper-Hewitt [2] supports an annual competition where people nominate great design.


 Voting has been open to the public online since mid September.  As it is too late to cast your vote, it isn’t too late to congratulate the winner and find out what people consider excellence in design.  The most exciting part of this year’s ballot is that many of the nominees were for projects geared towards sustainable progress. Social sustainability is one of the most important attributes for the public to consider, our responsibility towards sustainability and global issues shows promise. 


Last year the public chose the Katrina Cottage [3] by designer Marianne Cusato.  Designed with similar dimensions and attributes to the FEMA  [4]homes, this project is the alternative.  The 308 square foot cottage is constructed with fiber reinforced cement siding and a metal roof to withstand hurricane force winds. Since the launch of the project it has grown to attract habitants for multiple purposes.  The cottage itself isn’t necessarily a sustainable edifice, but as it will live through intense natural forces and sustain its structure over time.


  Also, similar to this year’s nomination for the LifeStraw [5] (a $2 straw that purifies water while drinking for those who don’t have access to safe drinking water), the Katrina Cottage highlights the need for alternatives regarding current issues.  When these alternatives are designed with sustainability, necessity, and in this case affordability in mind, we get closer to practical solutions and functional design for a sustainable, safe and healthy future. 


This year’s winner is TOMS shoes [6].  TOMS shoes is a simple project- with every pair of shoes bought, a pair is donated to a child who doesn’t have any.  TOMS mission [7] is to simply make life more comfortable.  Currently TOMS is running a pledge to get 50,000 pair of shoes to take over to South Africa on November 1.  These shoes will be divvied out to children in need. The shoes are not necessarily constructed with sustainable (recycled, reusable) materials, but the project does indeed socially sustain communities by enabling a more comfortable, and healthy lifestyle.  


Other nominees on the ballot this year geared towards social sustainability and massive change were Good Magazine [8], Design Can Change [9], and Global Green [10] Efforts in New Orleans.  Good Magazine [8] is a new San Francisco based publication highlighting projects geared towards social activism and sustainability.  Design Can Change [9] is a global campaign put together by SmashLAB [13] geared towards bringing designers together to fight climate change. 


Finally, Global Green [10] was nominated for their work in New Orleans geared towards using the opportunity to rebuild in a way that is more beneficial to the environment and the community.  Based on these nominations we can say with confidence that there are a lot of design efforts taking place to improve the condition of our health, safety, relationships and environment.  Now it is your turn to participate. 



[1] http://peoplesdesignaward.cooperhewitt.org/2007/
[2] http://www.cooperhewitt.org/
[3] http://peoplesdesignaward.cooperhewitt.org/2006/detail_view.php?nomination_id=186
[4] http://www.fema.gov/
[5] http://www.lifestraw.com/en/low/low.asp
[6] https://www.tomsshoes.com/Default.aspx
[7] https://www.tomsshoes.com/ourcause.aspx
[8] http://www.goodmagazine.com/
[9] http://www.designcanchange.org/
[10] http://www.globalgreen.org/
[11] http://www.goodmagazine.com/
[12] http://www.designcanchange.org/
[13] http://www.smashlab.com/
[14] http://www.globalgreen.org/]]></content:encoded>
    <wfw:commentRss>http://elizabethredmond.greenoptions.com/2007/10/19/eco-effective-design-social-sustainability-criteria-for-good-design/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>Weekend Web Review: The Project on Emerging Nanotechnologies &#8212; A Big Look at Small Things</title>
    <link>http://shirleysilukgregory.greenoptions.com/2007/10/13/weekend-web-review-the-project-on-emerging-nanotechnologies-a-big-look-at-small-things/</link>
    <comments>http://shirleysilukgregory.greenoptions.com/2007/10/13/weekend-web-review-the-project-on-emerging-nanotechnologies-a-big-look-at-small-things/#comments</comments>
    <pubDate>Sat, 13 Oct 2007 16:24:35 +0000</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Shirley Siluk Gregory</dc:creator>
    
		<category><![CDATA[cleantechnica]]></category>

    <guid isPermaLink="false">http://shirleysilukgregory.greenoptions.com/2007/10/13/weekend-web-review-the-project-on-emerging-nanotechnologies-a-big-look-at-small-things/</guid>
    <description><![CDATA[<p>
<img src="/files/402/Buckyball.png" border="0" alt="Buckyball, a type of nanoparticle (Wikimedia Commons)" width="250" height="244" align="right" />How much do Americans know about nanotechnology in the products they buy? According to the <a href="http://www.nanotechproject.org">Project on Emerging Nanotechnologies</a>, about as much as you could measure on a nanoscale  	… which is to say, a very, very little amount.

</p>
<p>
That's part of the reason the Project on Emerging Technologies got started in the first place. Established in 2005 by the Woodrow Wilson International Center for Scholars and The Pew Charitable Trusts, the Project on Emerging Technologies says its goal is &#34;helping business, government and the public anticipate and manage possible health and environmental implications of nanotechnology.&#34;
</p>
<p>
So what <em>is</em> nanotechnology? As the project's website puts it in its &#34;30-second primer,&#34; &#34;Nanotechnology is the art and science of manipulating matter at the nanoscale (down to 1/100,000 the width of a human hair) to create new and unique materials and products.&#34;
</p>
<p>
Matter does some pretty weird stuff when you get down to that scale. For instance, at the nanoscale, <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nanotechnology#Larger_to_smaller:_a_materials_perspective">copper</a> becomes transparent and gold becomes liquid. The unique properties of nanomaterials promise all sorts of innovations, from stronger materials for construction to cheaper ways to generate and store energy to better cures for diseases.</p>]]></description>
    <content:encoded><![CDATA[ How much do Americans know about nanotechnology in the products they buy? According to the Project on Emerging Nanotechnologies [1], about as much as you could measure on a nanoscale  	… which is to say, a very, very little amount.

That's part of the reason the Project on Emerging Technologies got started in the first place. Established in 2005 by the Woodrow Wilson International Center for Scholars and The Pew Charitable Trusts, the Project on Emerging Technologies says its goal is "helping business, government and the public anticipate and manage possible health and environmental implications of nanotechnology."

So what is nanotechnology? As the project's website puts it in its "30-second primer," "Nanotechnology is the art and science of manipulating matter at the nanoscale (down to 1/100,000 the width of a human hair) to create new and unique materials and products."

Matter does some pretty weird stuff when you get down to that scale. For instance, at the nanoscale, copper [2] becomes transparent and gold becomes liquid. The unique properties of nanomaterials promise all sorts of innovations, from stronger materials for construction to cheaper ways to generate and store energy to better cures for diseases.

For now, though, most of the nanomaterial-based products on the market are cosmetics, sporting goods, food storage containers and the like. Still, there's a lot more of them than you might think: nearly 600, according to the last update to the project's Inventory of Nanotechnology Consumer Products [3]. And the Project on Emerging Nanotechnologies is concerned that a) much of the buying public doesn't know what they're buying and b) if they find out about what they're buying thanks to even a minor product scare or false alarm, consumer confidence could collapse and public support for the real potential benefits of nanotechnology could shrivel.

In a poll [4] conducted by the project this summer, only 6 percent of Americans said they had heard "a lot" about nanotechology. And many of those who hadn't, once given a quick briefing on potential risks and benefits, expressed concern about the technology's safety.

"As in previous polls, the results of this survey indicate that public wants more information about nanotechnology," said David Rejeski, director of the Project on Emerging Nanotechnologies. "Most Americans will be reluctant to use nano food and food-related products until they know enough to evaluate the merits of these products."

And that's where the project's website comes in so handy: not only does it offer a regularly-updated database of nanomaterial-based consumer projects, which makes for eye-opening browsing, but it also provides lots more information about nanotechnology in the marketplace that's hard to find anywhere else. There are articles, blogs, research updates, podcasts, links, resources and even online events. In fact, the next event  	— "Consumers Talk Nano" [5]  	— set for Oct. 23, offers the public a chance to chat online with experts from the project, Consumers Union and other institutions.

It's one way in which the Project on Emerging Nanotechnologies is hoping to take something small and turn it into something much bigger, and more meaningful, for the buying public.

[1] http://www.nanotechproject.org
[2] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nanotechnology#Larger_to_smaller:_a_materials_perspective
[3] http://www.nanotechproject.org/index.php?id=44&#38;action=intro
[4] http://www.nanotechproject.org/138/9252007-poll-reveals-public-awareness-of-nanotech-stuck-at-low-level
[5] http://www.nanotechproject.org/139/10232007-consumers-talk-nano]]></content:encoded>
    <wfw:commentRss>http://shirleysilukgregory.greenoptions.com/2007/10/13/weekend-web-review-the-project-on-emerging-nanotechnologies-a-big-look-at-small-things/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>My own personal Green Tech and Halloween Project</title>
    <link>http://earth2joy.greenoptions.com/2007/10/13/my-own-personal-green-tech-and-halloween-project/</link>
    <comments>http://earth2joy.greenoptions.com/2007/10/13/my-own-personal-green-tech-and-halloween-project/#comments</comments>
    <pubDate>Sat, 13 Oct 2007 06:08:44 +0000</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Joy</dc:creator>
    
    <guid isPermaLink="false">http://earth2joy.greenoptions.com/2007/10/13/my-own-personal-green-tech-and-halloween-project/</guid>
    <description><![CDATA[<p>
For Columbus Day, my cousin and I took the &#34;Not Martha&#34; challenge and created our own little sun jars.  The project was quick with a total of 30 minutes to complete not including the wait time to store the sun rays and shopping of  the supplies used.   Also, it was fairly inexpensive at about $20 to make and fun to boot.  Definitely a great way of showing how you can have a little green tech in your home, plus a different approach to home improvement and gift giving.  
</p>]]></description>
    <content:encoded><![CDATA[
For Columbus Day, my cousin and I took the &#34;Not Martha&#34; challenge and created our own little sun jars.  The project was quick with a total of 30 minutes to complete not including the wait time to store the sun rays and shopping of  the supplies used.   Also, it was fairly inexpensive at about $20 to make and fun to boot.  Definitely a great way of showing how you can have a little green tech in your home, plus a different approach to home improvement and gift giving.  


I'm going to try and recreate them for Halloween and holiday gifts in place of pumpkins and candles.  Maybe add a stencil designs to them like the word &#34;Boo&#34; or a picture of a star or ornament.  The only concern I have is the toxicity of the glass frosting spray that I used.  The spray definitely made me feel a bit faint at the end of the day and I couldn't help but hum the tune from Macgyver.


Sun jar instructions:


http://www.notmartha.org/tomake/homemadesunjar [1]





Supplies needed:  Handy assistant, frosting spray, jar, solar lamp, iced mocha to keep up with the excitement.


Don't blink! 





Oh you blinked and missed the set up because it was that quick!  


See more here:


http://www.flickr.com/photos/earth2joy/sets/72157602337039519 


*The title of my flickr set &#34;How to make a BOMB ass sun jar&#34; was in reference to me trying to get through security for my flight home.  They did search my bag and instead of saying &#34;science project,&#34; I told them it was my solar lamp gift per my smart cousins' husband's suggestion. 



[1] http://www.notmartha.org/tomake/homemadesunjar]]></content:encoded>
    <wfw:commentRss>http://earth2joy.greenoptions.com/2007/10/13/my-own-personal-green-tech-and-halloween-project/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>Cool Planet Jewelry Introduces StopGlobalWarming.org Jewelry Collection</title>
    <link>http://jerrycope.greenoptions.com/2007/10/12/cool-planet-jewelry-introduces-stopglobalwarmingorg-jewelry-collection/</link>
    <comments>http://jerrycope.greenoptions.com/2007/10/12/cool-planet-jewelry-introduces-stopglobalwarmingorg-jewelry-collection/#comments</comments>
    <pubDate>Fri, 12 Oct 2007 22:26:21 +0000</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Jerry Cope</dc:creator>
    
    <guid isPermaLink="false">http://jerrycope.greenoptions.com/2007/10/12/cool-planet-jewelry-introduces-stopglobalwarmingorg-jewelry-collection/</guid>
    <description><![CDATA[<blockquote>
	</blockquote><blockquote>
		I hope this is of interest. Please contact me for more info...Jerry
	</blockquote>
	<blockquote></blockquote>]]></description>
    <content:encoded><![CDATA[
	
		I hope this is of interest. Please contact me for more info...Jerry
	
	
		Cool Planet Jewelry announced today that it has teamed up with the Stop Global Warming Virtual March to develop a special StopGlobalWarming.org collection of  fine handcrafted jewelry, using recycled precious metals.   All Cool Planet Jewelry products have been developed to ensure that every aspect of the company’s operations are socially, economically, and environmentally responsible.   The collection uses recycled precious metals thus eliminating new mining, which is a significant source of environment degradation.
		 
		The StopGlobalWarming.org collection features a men’s and women’s line jewelry ranging from necklaces to bracelets and pins, all featuring the StopGlobalWarming.org logo.
		 
		“We are thrilled to partner with Cool Planet Jewelry and encourage concerned citizens to support this beautiful and environmentally responsible jewelry collection,” said Laurie David, global warming activist and founder of StopGlobalWarming.org.   
		 
		Founded by Laurie David, John McCain and Robert F. Kennedy Jr. StopGlobalWarming.org has galvanized over 900,000 individual marchers including leading scientists, entertainers, athletes, political and religious leaders, and corporations who are concerned about the overheating of the planet and have united to urge government to find solutions to the growing and imminent danger of global warming.
		 
		With every purchase a generous donation will be made to both StopGlobalWarming.org and the Natural Resources Defense Council.  Visit www.coolplanetjewelry.com [1] &#60;http://www.coolplanetjewelry.com/ [2]&#62; . The web site is 100% solar powered.
		 
	



[1] http://www.coolplanetjewelry.com/
[2] http://www.coolplanetjewelry.com/]]></content:encoded>
    <wfw:commentRss>http://jerrycope.greenoptions.com/2007/10/12/cool-planet-jewelry-introduces-stopglobalwarmingorg-jewelry-collection/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>Greening Your Groove, Part One</title>
    <link>http://gavinhudson.greenoptions.com/2007/10/09/greening-your-groove-part-one/</link>
    <comments>http://gavinhudson.greenoptions.com/2007/10/09/greening-your-groove-part-one/#comments</comments>
    <pubDate>Tue, 09 Oct 2007 15:00:12 +0000</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Gavin Hudson</dc:creator>
    
		<category><![CDATA[Energy]]></category>

    <guid isPermaLink="false">http://gavinhudson.greenoptions.com/2007/10/09/greening-your-groove-part-one/</guid>
    <description><![CDATA[<p>
<img src="/files/961/chimpanzee_with_headphones.jpg" alt="" width="252" height="189" align="right" />Are you a green music pirate? (ARRR!) Free music downloading has generated a lot of debate, with some artists for and others against it. Well, here's a positive note for all you lyrical plunderers: downloading music is more environmentally friendly than buying it on CD. But you don't have to be scurvy about it either: these days, it's arguably much easier (and cheaper) to buy your music fair and square on iTunes than it is to buy CDs at the music shop. Besides, you're more likely to find new musicians you like in the gigantic online music archives than in the cramped aisles of a music store.
</p>
<p>
Here's the green beat: CDs contain aluminum, polycarbonate, lacquer, dyes, nickel, and chemical feedstock from oil, none of which are particularly groovy for the environment. And the jewel case and shrink-wrapping don't make CDs any healthier for the planet. Plus, with iPods and similar technologies abounding, how often do we buy the CD, upload the songs to our computers, listen to the tunes on our laptops and handheld devices, and never again touch the CD itself? These days, as <a href="http://torants.blogspot.com/2007/01/apple-itunes-store-environmental-impact.html">this</a> green blog puts it, CDs are nothing more than extra packaging for the music we buy. Spare the waste and the toxic materials by downloading your music directly. 
</p>
<p>
By now, <em><a href="http://www.amazon.com/gp/redirect.html?ie=UTF8&#38;location=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.amazon.com%2FHigh-Fidelity-Lisa-Bonet%2Fdp%2FB00003CXGA%3Fie%3DUTF8%26s%3Ddvd%26qid%3D1191941974%26sr%3D8-1&#38;tag=greeopti-20&#38;linkCode=ur2&#38;camp=1789&#38;creative=9325">High Fidelity</a><img src="http://www.assoc-amazon.com/e/ir?t=greeopti-20&#38;l=ur2&#38;o=1" border="0" alt="" width="1" height="1" /></em> fans everywhere are groaning. Forgo the experience of music shops? But consider this a fresh spin: with a music library on your computer and not all over your house, it's much easier to arrange your music — not alphabetically — but chronologically in the order that you discovered the musician, or however you like.</p>]]></description>
    <content:encoded><![CDATA[
Are you a green music pirate? (ARRR!) Free music downloading has generated a lot of debate, with some artists for and others against it. Well, here's a positive note for all you lyrical plunderers: downloading music is more environmentally friendly than buying it on CD. But you don't have to be scurvy about it either: these days, it's arguably much easier (and cheaper) to buy your music fair and square on iTunes than it is to buy CDs at the music shop. Besides, you're more likely to find new musicians you like in the gigantic online music archives than in the cramped aisles of a music store.


Here's the green beat: CDs contain aluminum, polycarbonate, lacquer, dyes, nickel, and chemical feedstock from oil, none of which are particularly groovy for the environment. And the jewel case and shrink-wrapping don't make CDs any healthier for the planet. Plus, with iPods and similar technologies abounding, how often do we buy the CD, upload the songs to our computers, listen to the tunes on our laptops and handheld devices, and never again touch the CD itself? These days, as this [1] green blog puts it, CDs are nothing more than extra packaging for the music we buy. Spare the waste and the toxic materials by downloading your music directly. 


By now, High Fidelity [2] fans everywhere are groaning. Forgo the experience of music shops? But consider this a fresh spin: with a music library on your computer and not all over your house, it's much easier to arrange your music — not alphabetically — but chronologically in the order that you discovered the musician, or however you like.


Many readers will also ask, justifiably, whether it's actually more environmentally friendly to use a computer or handheld MP3 player to listen to music than it is to buy CDs. Let's look into this a bit because it's a good question. As per the computer, we'll assume that no one actually buys a computer just to listen to music. Rather than buying a CD player and hundreds of CDs, we can get all of our music using a single instrument that we would have purchased in any case. Therefore, even if it takes more juice to run a computer than a CD player, we can safely say that listening to music on your computer is better than buying CDs and playing them on your computer or CD player. Just remember to turn the computer on to use it and turn it off when we're done. If you mostly like to listen to music on the computer, problem solved. 


But what about handheld MP3 players — are they better for the environment than CDs? Greenpeace has an interesting article [3] full of both criticism and praise for Apple's iPod. The bad news for iPod users? These devices too are made with toxic chemicals, and when they break, they are cheaper to replace than to fix. On the other hand, CDs also have a definite lifespan and will sooner or later become landfill. But here's the good news: iPods are recyclable [4]. The final factor that gives MP3 players the edge over CDs is simply that they hold so many songs. The iPod classic holds up to 40,000 songs. At about 15 songs per disk, that would add up to over 2,600 CDs. Lastly, some environmentalists will also appreciate iPod features like the downloadable Animal Ingredients List A-Z [5], a &#34;portable, quick reference for vegans on-the-go.&#34; Features like these can make being green a little easier.


Lastly, there's the question of the energy used by the servers that hold music for people to buy online. They're left running 24/7 to allow people to buy music at any time of the day or night. Rather than arguing that this energy use is less environmentally taxing than the energy used in manufacturing CDs, let's do one better and take action on the issue. According to the Climate Counts consumer scorecard [6], Apple isn't doing much to address climate change. This could swiftly be rectified if, say, ten percent of Apple iTunes users contacted the company asking it to run its iTunes servers on clean energy. Change has to start somewhere, and this is a good opportunity.


For those of us who are less digitally wired, there's still the good old radio. A long product lifespan, low energy usage, and dozens of music radio stations give the radio impressive eco credentials. If considering the ins and outs of CDs vs. downloads makes your head spin, relax. We’re here to enjoy being green. Just turn the radio on and let the music flow. Also, it's worth checking out online radio. One site I highly recommend for discovering new artists is Musicovery [7].  


If you're using electrical devices for music, don't forget to turn them off and unplug them when they're not in use to save energy. For an extra eco touch, you can get a solar charger [8] for your iPod [9] or computer [10]. You can also choose to power your music (and your home) with renewable energy from your local utilities company [11] or an energy offset provider [12].


So turn up the volume and get your groove on. Dance like nobody's watching and let the green times roll.


References and Resources:


Apple iTunes Store Environmental Impact [13] &#124; Torants


iPoison + iWaste [14] &#124; Greenpeace


Apple and the Environment [15] &#124; Apple 


Compact Disc [16] &#124; Wikipedia 


Compact Disc Manufacturing  [17]&#124; Wikipedia 


Can I Buy Green Power In My State? [18] &#124; US Department of Energy 


&#160;


Photo Source:


Streetart in Lisbon,Portugal [19] &#124; Flickr 



[1] http://torants.blogspot.com/2007/01/apple-itunes-store-environmental-impact.html
[2] http://www.amazon.com/gp/redirect.html?ie=UTF8&#38;location=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.amazon.com%2FHigh-Fidelity-Lisa-Bonet%2Fdp%2FB00003CXGA%3Fie%3DUTF8%26s%3Ddvd%26qid%3D1191941974%26sr%3D8-1&#38;tag=greeopti-20&#38;linkCode=ur2&#38;camp=1789&#38;creative=9325
[3] http://www.greenpeace.org/apple/itox.html
[4] http://www.apple.com/environment/recycling/
[5] http://thirty5.org/ipod/
[6] http://www.climatecounts.org/scorecard.php
[7] http://www.musicovery.com/
[8] http://gavinhudson.greenoptions.com/2007/09/11/weekly_diy_solar_phone_charger
[9] http://store.sundancesolar.com/soposochfori.html
[10] http://www.gaiam.com/retail/3/SL_EcoGagets_Accessories
[11] http://www.eere.energy.gov/greenpower/buying/buying_power.shtml
[12] http://www.eere.energy.gov/greenpower/markets/certificates.shtml?page=1
[13] http://torants.blogspot.com/2007/01/apple-itunes-store-environmental-impact.html
[14] http://www.greenpeace.org/apple/itox.html
[15] http://www.apple.com/environment/recycling/
[16] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Compact_disc
[17] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/CD_manufacturing
[18] http://www.eere.energy.gov/greenpower/buying/buying_power.shtml
[19] http://www.flickr.com/photos/59328597@N00/35566978/]]></content:encoded>
    <wfw:commentRss>http://gavinhudson.greenoptions.com/2007/10/09/greening-your-groove-part-one/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>We are doing it, and so can you with our &#8220;Contract Farming Program&#8221;!</title>
    <link>http://pbtjoe.greenoptions.com/2007/10/08/we-are-doing-it-and-so-can-you-with-our-contract-farming-program/</link>
    <comments>http://pbtjoe.greenoptions.com/2007/10/08/we-are-doing-it-and-so-can-you-with-our-contract-farming-program/#comments</comments>
    <pubDate>Mon, 08 Oct 2007 20:14:35 +0000</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>PBTJOE</dc:creator>
    
		<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Energy]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Health]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Money]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>

    <guid isPermaLink="false">http://pbtjoe.greenoptions.com/2007/10/08/we-are-doing-it-and-so-can-you-with-our-contract-farming-program/</guid>
    <description><![CDATA[<p>
&#160;
</p>]]></description>
    <content:encoded><![CDATA[
&#160;

  

	
		
			Get Involved 
		
	


	
		
			
			
			Buying, Selling &#38; Investing in Jatropha Trees 
			
			1) Purchase Trees for Investment 
			
			2) Sell trees for Commissions as an Affiliate
		
	


&#160;


Whether you desire to buy trees to help the environment for personal reasons, for investment purposes or you simply refer others to buy trees through our Affiliate Program,  PanAm BioFuels has made the process so simple that everyone can find a way to participate in it. 

1) Purchase Trees for Investment

Jatropha trees can be bought directly from Pan-Am Biofuels for only $4 each in lots ranging from 250 trees for $1000 to 25,000 trees for $100,000.  Though delivery is possible for larger volumes, we will believe most people will take advantage of our Contract Farming Program where we will actually plant your trees on our plantations.  


With our Contract Farming Program we do all the work from planting to harvest to sale of the oil.  The only fee for all of this is a 10% fee from profits.  Then 90% of the profits are passed on to you, the tree owner.  All you have to do is purchase your trees in lots for only $4/each. [1] 


If you have priced trees at your local nursery you will see most prices range from $10 to $25. So now you may be thinking... 


&#34;How can you produce, plant and sell these trees at only $4 each?&#34; 


There are several reasons, including, but not limited to, 


	Because the cost of living as well as labor is much cheaper in Central America where our nurseries are located. 
	The efficiencies and economies of scale we enjoy by the huge volume of trees our nursery outputs allow us to save a tremendous amount of money passing the savings on to you. 
	Our nursery is in close proximity to our Jatropha Tree plantation in Costa Rica where our Contract Farming Program is being implemented so there are minimal transportation expenses. 


&#34;So how much money do I stand to earn by buying your Jatropha Trees? What is the return on my investment?&#34;  


Your trees can potentially bring  as much as 45% PER YEAR calculated  from your original investment once the trees start producing within 3-4 years.   Jatropha trees start bearing seeds the second year and reach maximum production at about 4 years.  You can review the full details and Financial Projections [2] once you register and login. 


Pan-Am Biofuels has truly created a unique situation and opportunity for the average person to take advantage of. 


Now you can participate in an industry that has produced the wealthiest individuals and corporations in the world. The only difference is, instead of drilling for oil and destroying the environment, you will be growing oil and restoring the environment by owning oil producing Jatrpha Trees [3] 

2) Sell trees for Commissions as an Affiliate 

We will pay you to refer customers! Pan-Am Biofuels has created a lucrative opportunity for webmasters,  business owners and individuals alike. By becoming an Affiliate you can help promote our Jatropha tree project, earn commissions and at the same time you'll be doing your part to better our environment.  Learn more about how our Affiliate Program works.  [4]



&#160;


&#160;



[1] http://pbtjoe.greenoptions.com/index.php?option=com_content&#38;task=view&#38;id=45&#38;Itemid=75
[2] http://pbtjoe.greenoptions.com/index.php?option=com_content&#38;task=view&#38;id=49&#38;Itemid=84
[3] http://pbtjoe.greenoptions.com/index.php?option=com_content&#38;task=view&#38;id=45&#38;Itemid=75
[4] http://pbtjoe.greenoptions.com/index.php?option=com_content&#38;task=view&#38;id=52&#38;Itemid=94]]></content:encoded>
    <wfw:commentRss>http://pbtjoe.greenoptions.com/2007/10/08/we-are-doing-it-and-so-can-you-with-our-contract-farming-program/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>Eco-Effective Decisions: Composting Confusion</title>
    <link>http://elizabethredmond.greenoptions.com/2007/10/03/eco-effective-decisions-composting-confusion/</link>
    <comments>http://elizabethredmond.greenoptions.com/2007/10/03/eco-effective-decisions-composting-confusion/#comments</comments>
    <pubDate>Wed, 03 Oct 2007 18:12:31 +0000</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Elizabeth Redmond</dc:creator>
    
		<category><![CDATA[Activism]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Consumer Products]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Cradle to Cradle]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Education]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Gardening]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Green Building]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[certifications]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[compostable+logo]]></category>

    <guid isPermaLink="false">http://elizabethredmond.greenoptions.com/2007/10/03/eco-effective-decisions-composting-confusion/</guid>
    <description><![CDATA[<p>
<img src="/files/669/compost.gif" alt="" width="252" height="93" align="right" />Just as certain building products can earn <a href="/2007/09/07/eco_effective_mail_usps_turns_to_mbdc_to_create_cradle_to_cradle_packages">Cradle-to-Cradle Certification</a>, now disposable materials and products can earn a compostable seal. With the adoption of the <a href="http://www.astm.org/cgi-bin/SoftCart.exe/index.shtml?E+mystore">American Society for Testing and Materials Specifications</a> (ASTM), the <a href="http://www.bpiworld.org/BPI-Public">Biodegradable Products Institute</a> of New York and the <a href="http://www.compostingcouncil.org/index.cfm">US Composting</a> Council are helping provide consumers with consistent information on materials and compostability. By using standard that are already in place, this allows for other companies to use the same criteria to evaluate materials, and ultimately allow for consistency across the board.
</p>
<p>
ASTM is an open forum for the development of high quality, market-relevant international standards used around the globe. According to the Biodegradable Products Institute,
</p>
<blockquote>
	…these specifications are the result of 8 years of intensive work by researchers, product manufacturers, composters, and resin producers to identify plastic and paper products which disintegrate and biodegrade completely and safely when composted in a municipal or commercial facility, like kraft paper, yard trimmings and food scraps.  
</blockquote>
<p>
With this rising attention to life cycle analysis of consumables, it is helpful to know if a cup we throw in the trash it is going to sit in the dump for thousands of years or not.  Right?  As consumers, we need to know what seals and labels are valid in order to trust and respect these claims.  We are in a time when these issues such as life-cycle assessment, compostablility, recyclability 	… are bombarding us daily.  If we can't trust the validity of these claims, or if we see most things as merely greenwashed (to appear as a part of the &#34;trend&#34;), then consumers will lose interest.  Then, the &#34;trend&#34; will dissipate or expire and we will be left with the same issues, and more confusion and rebellion.</p>]]></description>
    <content:encoded><![CDATA[
Just as certain building products can earn Cradle-to-Cradle Certification [1], now disposable materials and products can earn a compostable seal. With the adoption of the American Society for Testing and Materials Specifications [2] (ASTM), the Biodegradable Products Institute [3] of New York and the US Composting [4] Council are helping provide consumers with consistent information on materials and compostability. By using standard that are already in place, this allows for other companies to use the same criteria to evaluate materials, and ultimately allow for consistency across the board.


ASTM is an open forum for the development of high quality, market-relevant international standards used around the globe. According to the Biodegradable Products Institute,


	…these specifications are the result of 8 years of intensive work by researchers, product manufacturers, composters, and resin producers to identify plastic and paper products which disintegrate and biodegrade completely and safely when composted in a municipal or commercial facility, like kraft paper, yard trimmings and food scraps.  


With this rising attention to life cycle analysis of consumables, it is helpful to know if a cup we throw in the trash it is going to sit in the dump for thousands of years or not.  Right?  As consumers, we need to know what seals and labels are valid in order to trust and respect these claims.  We are in a time when these issues such as life-cycle assessment, compostablility, recyclability 	… are bombarding us daily.  If we can't trust the validity of these claims, or if we see most things as merely greenwashed (to appear as a part of the &#34;trend&#34;), then consumers will lose interest.  Then, the &#34;trend&#34; will dissipate or expire and we will be left with the same issues, and more confusion and rebellion. 


This sounds terrifying right? Yes.  So, it's important to look for seals that are used on products that come from multiple product companies.  If you check out the BPI website [5], you will see that many companies have come to them to obtain their evaluation and thus their seal to accredit their hard work.  This is a good sign.


The interesting aspect to the BPI program is that they have their own private label in which they (at a first glance, anyway) disguise that they use more widely-accepted criteria to award their seal.  The problem here is that this doesn't allow consumers to leverage decisions very easily when everything is (seemingly) evaluated against a different set of criteria, and thus obtaining different seals.  I can, although, leave you with the confidence that the Biodegradable Products Institute &#34;compostable&#34; logo is a valid one. 



[1] http://elizabethredmond.greenoptions.com/2007/09/07/eco_effective_mail_usps_turns_to_mbdc_to_create_cradle_to_cradle_packages
[2] http://www.astm.org/cgi-bin/SoftCart.exe/index.shtml?E+mystore
[3] http://www.bpiworld.org/BPI-Public
[4] http://www.compostingcouncil.org/index.cfm
[5] http://www.bpiworld.org/BPI-Public/Members/Directory.html]]></content:encoded>
    <wfw:commentRss>http://elizabethredmond.greenoptions.com/2007/10/03/eco-effective-decisions-composting-confusion/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>LED tea lights!</title>
    <link>http://serenityii.greenoptions.com/2007/10/02/led-tea-lights/</link>
    <comments>http://serenityii.greenoptions.com/2007/10/02/led-tea-lights/#comments</comments>
    <pubDate>Tue, 02 Oct 2007 19:48:34 +0000</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>serenity_ii</dc:creator>
    
    <guid isPermaLink="false">http://serenityii.greenoptions.com/2007/10/02/led-tea-lights/</guid>
    <description><![CDATA[Found these LED tea lights, and they're awesome, and it's a good deal!
<div>
http://www.cudge.net/candles_detail10.htm
</div>
<div>
No more using up lots of wax tea lights, no more blown-out flames, no more burning risks, hopefully no more toxins!
</div>
]]></description>
    <content:encoded><![CDATA[Found these LED tea lights, and they're awesome, and it's a good deal!

http://www.cudge.net/candles_detail10.htm


No more using up lots of wax tea lights, no more blown-out flames, no more burning risks, hopefully no more toxins!

]]></content:encoded>
    <wfw:commentRss>http://serenityii.greenoptions.com/2007/10/02/led-tea-lights/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>Eco-Effective Furniture: DIY Packaging Projects</title>
    <link>http://elizabethredmond.greenoptions.com/2007/09/28/eco-effective-furniture-diy-packaging-projects/</link>
    <comments>http://elizabethredmond.greenoptions.com/2007/09/28/eco-effective-furniture-diy-packaging-projects/#comments</comments>
    <pubDate>Fri, 28 Sep 2007 14:24:59 +0000</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Elizabeth Redmond</dc:creator>
    
		<category><![CDATA[Consumer Products]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Do+it+yourself]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Fine Arts]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Green Building]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Home and Interior]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Media]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[furniture]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[packaging]]></category>

    <guid isPermaLink="false">http://elizabethredmond.greenoptions.com/2007/09/28/eco-effective-furniture-diy-packaging-projects/</guid>
    <description><![CDATA[<p>
<img src="/files/669/tomballhatchetsecotvstand2.jpg" alt="" width="273" height="300" align="right" />When we order a new piece of furniture or new piece of technology for our home, it comes delivered in a box large enough for kids to build a fort in (what I did in an old refrigerator box once). There's so much packaging that you have to call your trash service and request a special “large load” pick-up.   I am ashamed to bring home a plastic bag from the grocery store when I forget my cloth, but how ashamed are we when we request this mountain of waste.
</p>
<p>
Well a recent graduate of Central St Martins’ Masters Industrial Design Program, <a href="http://www.tomballhatchet.com/">Tom Ballhatchet,</a> decided to use the guild in a constructive way.  Instead of throwing away all this stamped foam packaging from his new flat-screen TV, Tom decided to construct an entertainment stand.  It makes us think of the form of these extruded or stamped packaging part, oftentimes they are the same shape and size or have nice crevices that can serve as storage. My only wish in this project is that he found a way to incorporate the gigantic box and plastic wrap.
</p>
<p></p>]]></description>
    <content:encoded><![CDATA[
When we order a new piece of furniture or new piece of technology for our home, it comes delivered in a box large enough for kids to build a fort in (what I did in an old refrigerator box once). There's so much packaging that you have to call your trash service and request a special “large load” pick-up.   I am ashamed to bring home a plastic bag from the grocery store when I forget my cloth, but how ashamed are we when we request this mountain of waste.


Well a recent graduate of Central St Martins’ Masters Industrial Design Program, Tom Ballhatchet, [1] decided to use the guild in a constructive way.  Instead of throwing away all this stamped foam packaging from his new flat-screen TV, Tom decided to construct an entertainment stand.  It makes us think of the form of these extruded or stamped packaging part, oftentimes they are the same shape and size or have nice crevices that can serve as storage. My only wish in this project is that he found a way to incorporate the gigantic box and plastic wrap.


&#160;


With this trend of Zero waste design and seeing packaging as superfluous, we are beginning to see even more products out there that use their packaging in the fully constructed form.  Lite2Go’s packaging doubles as the actual lampshade leaving very little waste (the label and instructions for assembly).   Designed by Knoed  [2](i.e. know no-end), Lite2go is a good example of their mission statement- “taking into consideration the full life cycle of materials going into the products they design”.   The packaging/shade is made of recyclable polypropylene plastic; and the electric cord and bulb can be recycled at the appropriate centers. 


The interesting thing about this design is that it is just plain practical.  One doesn’t have to be an eco-conscious consumer to see this.  Why create extra packaging when it is unnecessary?  Although the light is marketed as a green product, it could be marketed just as a light with a fun DIY surprise.


With this trend of cutting down on emissions and waste, we need to think beyond recycling.  As recycling requires energy to break materials down into a new usable source, reusing materials for a new purpose is much more energy efficient.  I challenge you to get creative with your waste and repurpose some of it at least once before you get rid of it. 



[1] http://www.tomballhatchet.com/
[2] http://www.knoend.com/]]></content:encoded>
    <wfw:commentRss>http://elizabethredmond.greenoptions.com/2007/09/28/eco-effective-furniture-diy-packaging-projects/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>Green Family Values:  Silk, the Best Natural Fabric for Your Child&#8217;s Imagination</title>
    <link>http://jenniferlance.greenoptions.com/2007/09/26/green-family-values-silk-the-best-natural-fabric-for-your-childs-imagination/</link>
    <comments>http://jenniferlance.greenoptions.com/2007/09/26/green-family-values-silk-the-best-natural-fabric-for-your-childs-imagination/#comments</comments>
    <pubDate>Wed, 26 Sep 2007 11:43:22 +0000</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Jennifer Lance</dc:creator>
    
		<category><![CDATA[Health]]></category>

    <guid isPermaLink="false">http://jenniferlance.greenoptions.com/2007/09/26/green-family-values-silk-the-best-natural-fabric-for-your-childs-imagination/</guid>
    <description><![CDATA[<p>
<img src="/files/373/862063.jpg" alt="" width="200" height="223" align="right" />With the <a href="/2007/08/15/green_family_values_recall_recall_recall">explosion of toy recalls</a> lately and information regarding the <a href="http://notquitecrunchyparent.blogspot.com/2007/09/dangerous-plastic-for-kids-why-natural.html">dangers of plastic toys</a>, families are searching out safe, green toy alternatives. Previously, I wrote about <a href="/2007/06/26/green_family_values_natural_wooden_toys_by_plan_toys">Plan Toys</a> rubber wood toys, which provide children with sustainably harvested toys; however, children need soft, cuddly play items, too.  <a href="http://ecochildsplay.blogspot.com/2007/05/play-silks-provide-boundless.html">Silk scarves</a> and dress-up clothes provide children with safe, natural toys that expand their imagination.  
</p>
<p>
Preschool teachers and parents often complain that dress-up clothes are disorganized and difficult for children wear; however, all these dress-up clothes are not necessary.   At a performing arts conference for teachers I attended, <a href="http://click.linksynergy.com/fs-bin/click?id=7XC30hIi1Rs&#38;offerid=47166.578453879&#38;type=10&#38;subid=">Play Silks</a> were recommended as the only costume prop needed in the classroom or home. Children can make any costume using their imagination with Play Silks.  Like blocks, they are truly open-ended, versatile, and limitless for play.    In addition, silk is durable, soft, and aesthetically pleasing.  
</p>
<p>
Play Silks are expensive, but you and your child get a lot for the money. At about $11 piece (you do get a discount for buying a set), their cost kept me from buying them for many years. I wanted to make my own set, but time slipped away, and I realized I never would get around to actually doing it (I still haven't finished knitting the sweater I started for my daughter five years ago!).   You can select plain silk scarves from <a href="http://www.dharmatrading.com/html/eng/3273-AA.shtml">Dharma Trading Company</a> for anywhere between $1.00 and $4.00 and naturally dye them yourself to save money.  Since purchasing a set of Play Silks, I am very pleased with how they have contributed to my daughter's dramatic play.  Our Play Silks are over a year old, and they show no signs of wear and tear.</p>]]></description>
    <content:encoded><![CDATA[
With the explosion of toy recalls [1] lately and information regarding the dangers of plastic toys [2], families are searching out safe, green toy alternatives. Previously, I wrote about Plan Toys [3] rubber wood toys, which provide children with sustainably harvested toys; however, children need soft, cuddly play items, too.  Silk scarves [4] and dress-up clothes provide children with safe, natural toys that expand their imagination.  


Preschool teachers and parents often complain that dress-up clothes are disorganized and difficult for children wear; however, all these dress-up clothes are not necessary.   At a performing arts conference for teachers I attended, Play Silks [5] were recommended as the only costume prop needed in the classroom or home. Children can make any costume using their imagination with Play Silks.  Like blocks, they are truly open-ended, versatile, and limitless for play.    In addition, silk is durable, soft, and aesthetically pleasing.  


Play Silks are expensive, but you and your child get a lot for the money. At about $11 piece (you do get a discount for buying a set), their cost kept me from buying them for many years. I wanted to make my own set, but time slipped away, and I realized I never would get around to actually doing it (I still haven't finished knitting the sweater I started for my daughter five years ago!).   You can select plain silk scarves from Dharma Trading Company [6] for anywhere between $1.00 and $4.00 and naturally dye them yourself to save money.  Since purchasing a set of Play Silks, I am very pleased with how they have contributed to my daughter's dramatic play.  Our Play Silks are over a year old, and they show no signs of wear and tear.  


Halloween is around the corner, and there are many great costumes made from natural silk.   Magic Cabin [7] offers many silk costumes for children, and these costumes are breathable and comfortable, unlike the vinyl costumes of my youth.  Natural fabrics inspire children to explore life through their play, and a silk costume will long out live the Halloween holiday and be incorporated in your child's ongoing dramatic play.  


Toys made from natural fibers, such as silk, encourage meaningful play.  Not only are these toys safe, but also they inspire children's social, emotional, cognitive, and physical development.   Silk toys may be more expensive than their plastic, vinyl, or polyester counterparts, but parents can feel good about providing their children with natural toys that leave less of an impact on our environment and are safer for our children.   



[1] http://jenniferlance.greenoptions.com/2007/08/15/green_family_values_recall_recall_recall
[2] http://notquitecrunchyparent.blogspot.com/2007/09/dangerous-plastic-for-kids-why-natural.html
[3] http://jenniferlance.greenoptions.com/2007/06/26/green_family_values_natural_wooden_toys_by_plan_toys
[4] http://ecochildsplay.blogspot.com/2007/05/play-silks-provide-boundless.html
[5] http://click.linksynergy.com/fs-bin/click?id=7XC30hIi1Rs&#38;offerid=47166.578453879&#38;type=10&#38;subid=
[6] http://www.dharmatrading.com/html/eng/3273-AA.shtml
[7] http://jenniferlance.greenoptions.com/%3Ca%20mce_thref=%22http://click.linksynergy.com/fs-bin/click?id=7XC30hIi1Rs&#38;offerid=47166.100739900&#38;type=10&#38;subid=%22%3Ehttp://www.magiccabin.com/searchform.asp]]></content:encoded>
    <wfw:commentRss>http://jenniferlance.greenoptions.com/2007/09/26/green-family-values-silk-the-best-natural-fabric-for-your-childs-imagination/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>Five Affordable Eco-Clothing Options</title>
    <link>http://kellibestoliver.greenoptions.com/2007/09/25/five-affordable-eco-clothing-options/</link>
    <comments>http://kellibestoliver.greenoptions.com/2007/09/25/five-affordable-eco-clothing-options/#comments</comments>
    <pubDate>Tue, 25 Sep 2007 13:25:01 +0000</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Kelli Best-Oliver</dc:creator>
    
		<category><![CDATA[Agriculture]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Consumer Products]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Design]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Eco-Entrepreneurs]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Fair Trade]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Fashion and Apparel]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Frugal Living]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Levi's]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Money]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[REI]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[american apparel]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[eco-friendly clothing]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[rawganique]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[sustainable clothing]]></category>

    <guid isPermaLink="false">http://kellibestoliver.greenoptions.com/2007/09/25/five-affordable-eco-clothing-options/</guid>
    <description><![CDATA[<p>
<img src="/files/110/jeans.jpg" alt="" width="250" height="167" align="right" />A friend came to me and asked about making greener choices when shopping for clothing.  A new eco-clothing boutique just opened down the street from our workplace, and it was filled with cute, stylish clothing that I would wear to work or outside of work.  Unfortunately, most of the clothes weren't fitting into my teacher-salary budget.  When it comes to buying greener clothing, most people have two options: buy used or buy eco-sensitive.  I love thrifting, and I get a lot of my clothes that way.  Sometimes, though, particularly when buying professional clothes, I can't find what I need, and it's time-consuming (although fun!)  When I need something new, I don't have a problem finding clothes I love that are made more sustainably.  My problem is finding affordable wardrobe solutions.
</p>
<p>
Yeah, yeah, I know that cheap clothing is cheap for a reason (or several): exploitative labor practices and environmentally-destructive materials, to name a few.  And I support paying a premium for items that are ethically made, just like when I grocery shop.  It's still hard for me to plunk down my hard-earned cash for upscale sustainable goods; I just don't have that disposable income, and, frankly, clothes aren't so important to me that even if I did have the cash to spare, I'd probably use it for something else.  But a girl needs to feel good in her clothes, and I do have to exercise a modicum of professional dress when I'm teaching kids about renewable energy.  So I set off on a quest to find five places where I could make better clothing choices without breaking the bank.
</p>
<p>
Disclaimer: &#34;affordable&#34; is a weighted word.  What some people see as a bargain, others would and/or could never pay.  My idea of affordable can best be described as middle-class: I'm a teacher, my husband is a teacher, we don't come from money, and we have bills to pay.  I'm not really looking for high-fashion here, but mostly basic pieces I can use in a variety of ways with my existing wardrobe.</p>]]></description>
    <content:encoded><![CDATA[
A friend came to me and asked about making greener choices when shopping for clothing.  A new eco-clothing boutique just opened down the street from our workplace, and it was filled with cute, stylish clothing that I would wear to work or outside of work.  Unfortunately, most of the clothes weren't fitting into my teacher-salary budget.  When it comes to buying greener clothing, most people have two options: buy used or buy eco-sensitive.  I love thrifting, and I get a lot of my clothes that way.  Sometimes, though, particularly when buying professional clothes, I can't find what I need, and it's time-consuming (although fun!)  When I need something new, I don't have a problem finding clothes I love that are made more sustainably.  My problem is finding affordable wardrobe solutions.


Yeah, yeah, I know that cheap clothing is cheap for a reason (or several): exploitative labor practices and environmentally-destructive materials, to name a few.  And I support paying a premium for items that are ethically made, just like when I grocery shop.  It's still hard for me to plunk down my hard-earned cash for upscale sustainable goods; I just don't have that disposable income, and, frankly, clothes aren't so important to me that even if I did have the cash to spare, I'd probably use it for something else.  But a girl needs to feel good in her clothes, and I do have to exercise a modicum of professional dress when I'm teaching kids about renewable energy.  So I set off on a quest to find five places where I could make better clothing choices without breaking the bank.


Disclaimer: &#34;affordable&#34; is a weighted word.  What some people see as a bargain, others would and/or could never pay.  My idea of affordable can best be described as middle-class: I'm a teacher, my husband is a teacher, we don't come from money, and we have bills to pay.  I'm not really looking for high-fashion here, but mostly basic pieces I can use in a variety of ways with my existing wardrobe.  


I've loved American Apparel [1] for a long time.  I'm a t-shirt and jeans kind of woman, so AA clothing fits my style, and their t-shirts fit like a dream.  Almost all of their entire line is cotton, and about 20% of the cotton they use is organic.  The company has plans to expand that to 80% in the next four years.  Most of the organic cotton they use now is in their Sustainable Edition line [2].  They also recycle over a million pounds of fabric scrap per year and have solar panels on the roof of their LA headquarters.  I like their clothes because they are comfortable and versatile; I've worn their skirts and shirts all over.  Warning: there are claims against AA, mostly stemming from union-busting and sexual harassment accusations against owner Dov Charney, but their environmental record is promising.


Levi Strauss [3] has been a leader in greening up denim, and their organic cotton jeans, t-shirts, and polo shirts for men and women also incorporate recycled rivets, zippers, and buttons; they also use natural indigo to dye their denim.  Although their RedTab line is way out of my price range, their non-RedTab Eco's are quite reasonable for new jeans: less than $70, and they've got very contemporary styles (although I don't really have the courage, or the body, to wear skinny jeans.)  If I can't find jeans at the local thrift store, or wanted something more current, I'd try to find these.  They also had some bargain men's polo shirts at their online store that I'd probably get for my husband to wear to work.


Victoria E wrote about Jonano [4] back in May, but I waited to check them out until recently, and I wish I hadn't.  What a jackpot!  Jonano [5] produces certified organic cotton, bamboo, and hemp clothing, along with their popular ecoKashmere blend, and their clothing is made using Fair Labor practices.  Jonano's fabrics are dyed using low-impact dyes, and their packaging and mailings are printed on recycled paper.  Their lines are women-heavy, with hardly anything for men, but I fell in love with many of their pieces, including some beautiful dresses [6], shorts [7], and pants [8].  I can't wait to order from Jonano the next time I'm in the market for clothing.


Rawganique [9] offers sweatshop-free organic hemp, cotton, and linen clothing from Ecolution [10], Blue Canoe [11], and their own line of clothing.  Although many of their items seemed a bit pricey, I found some dresses, skirts, and sports jackets that were reasonably-priced, and they offer hemp and linen alongside the widely-found organic cotton.  I'd use this place in a pinch if I couldn't find what I wanted elsewhere, but they're definitely walking the walk as far as sustainability.  Check out their About Us [12] for proof!


Finally, REI [13] gets my vote for affordable outdoor gear that can double as everyday wardrobe.  I wrote at length about their sustainability efforts last week [14].  The versatility of their clothing — I can wear it to work or around the campsite — makes many of their pieces sustainable choices, and I didn't gasp when I checked the price tag: $50 seems reasonable for a durable pair of pants for my husband or a warm recycled-PET fleece jacket.  If you are looking for well-made basics that will take a beating, don't be afraid to try this performance gear — it's not just for the backcountry.

These are five places that fit into both my aesthetic and price range.  I also recommend you check out discount websites that offer more expensive clothing at cut-rate prices.  For example, I found Loomstate [15] jeans at over half off on Bluefly.com [16].



[1] http://www.americanapparel.net
[2] http://americanapparelorganics.com/buy.html
[3] http://www.levistrauss.com/
[4] http://kellibestoliver.greenoptions.com/2007/05/30/green_style_spotlight_jon_no
[5] http://www.jonano.com
[6] http://www.jonano.com/w8339r-bla-ecokashmere%AE-assymetrical-hem-bandeau-dress-black-p1669.html
[7] http://www.jonano.com/w1303r-green-ecokashmere%AE-page-boy-short-avocado-green-p1660.html
[8] http://www.jonano.com/_s900h-mia-pant-black-p1756.html
[9] http://www.rawganique.com
[10] http://ecolution.com/
[11] http://www.bluecanoe.com/
[12] http://www.rawganique.com/aboutus.htm
[13] http://www.rei.com
[14] http://kellibestoliver.greenoptions.com/2007/09/20/rei_creates_eco_sensitive_clothing
[15] http://www.loomstate.org/
[16] http://www.bluefly.com]]></content:encoded>
    <wfw:commentRss>http://kellibestoliver.greenoptions.com/2007/09/25/five-affordable-eco-clothing-options/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>Powering LED Xmas Lights with Solar Power</title>
    <link>http://phil.greenoptions.com/2007/09/24/powering-led-xmas-lights-with-solar-power/</link>
    <comments>http://phil.greenoptions.com/2007/09/24/powering-led-xmas-lights-with-solar-power/#comments</comments>
    <pubDate>Mon, 24 Sep 2007 00:49:38 +0000</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Philip C. Curtis</dc:creator>
    
    <guid isPermaLink="false">http://phil.greenoptions.com/2007/09/24/powering-led-xmas-lights-with-solar-power/</guid>
    <description><![CDATA[<p>
<a href="http://www.holidayleds.com">LED Xmas lights</a> consume only .072 watts of electricty per bulb.  This means that a standard set of 70 LED Christmas tree lights will only draw about 5 watts of power.  With the LED string lights drawing so little power one can easily operate a substantial outdoor display with a very basic solar power generation unit.  A solar powered LED holiday light display would be ideal for homeowners in the southern U.S.
</p>]]></description>
    <content:encoded><![CDATA[
LED Xmas lights [1] consume only .072 watts of electricty per bulb.  This means that a standard set of 70 LED Christmas tree lights will only draw about 5 watts of power.  With the LED string lights drawing so little power one can easily operate a substantial outdoor display with a very basic solar power generation unit.  A solar powered LED holiday light display would be ideal for homeowners in the southern U.S.


I would be very interested in hearing any comments anyone has on solar power units.  We are hoping to set this up as a demonstration. 



[1] http://www.holidayleds.com]]></content:encoded>
    <wfw:commentRss>http://phil.greenoptions.com/2007/09/24/powering-led-xmas-lights-with-solar-power/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
  </item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- 330 queries in 0.977 seconds. -->