<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
  xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
  xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
  >

<channel>
  <title>Green Options &#187; Consumer Reports</title>
  <link>http://greenoptions.com/tag/consumer-reports</link>
  <description>Posts tagged 'Consumer Reports'</description>
  <pubDate>Mon, 06 Jul 2009 10:00:23 +0000</pubDate>
  <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
  <language>en</language>
  <item>
    <title>Consumer Reports: Insight is &#8216;Most Disappointing&#8217; Honda In a Long Time</title>
    <link>http://gas2.org/2009/07/06/consumer-reports-insight-is-most-disappointing-honda-in-a-long-time/</link>
    <comments>http://gas2.org/2009/07/06/consumer-reports-insight-is-most-disappointing-honda-in-a-long-time/#comments</comments>
    <pubDate>Mon, 06 Jul 2009 10:00:23 +0000</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Nick Chambers</dc:creator>
    
		<category><![CDATA[Hybrid-electric EVs]]></category>

    <guid isPermaLink="false">http://gas2.org/2009/07/06/consumer-reports-insight-is-most-disappointing-honda-in-a-long-time/</guid>
    <description><![CDATA[<p><strong>It seems that in the quest to sell the cheapest hybrid they possibly could — a &#8220;hybrid for everyone&#8221; as Honda&#8217;s tagline goes — Honda has majorly skimped on some truly essential bits. Have they made a critical strategic error?</strong></p>
<p style="text-align: center"><img class="alignnone size-full wp-image-2818 aligncenter" src="http://go635254.s3.amazonaws.com/gas2/files/2009/07/honda_insight_fail_1.jpg" alt="" width="500" height="318" /></p>

<p>As detailed in the just released August issue of <a href="http://www.consumerreports.org" target="_blank">Consumer Reports</a> magazine, out of a crop of 22 small hatchbacks and wagons, the <a href="http://automobiles.honda.com/insight-hybrid/" target="_blank">Insight</a> — Honda&#8217;s much-touted all new Hybrid — came in 21st on the road test with one of the worst performances CR has seen from Honda in longer than many of the editors at the venerable publication can remember. The only car in that group to fare worse on the road test was the Dodge Caliber.</p>
<p><a href="http://gas2.org/2009/07/06/consumer-reports-insight-is-most-disappointing-honda-in-a-long-time/" class="more-link">Read more of this story &#187;</a></p>
]]></description>
    <wfw:commentRss>http://gas2.org/2009/07/06/consumer-reports-insight-is-most-disappointing-honda-in-a-long-time/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>Don’t Buy These Attachment Parenting Products Alleges Consumer Reports</title>
    <link>http://ecochildsplay.com/2009/04/28/dont-buy-these-attachment-parenting-products-alleges-consumer-reports/</link>
    <comments>http://ecochildsplay.com/2009/04/28/dont-buy-these-attachment-parenting-products-alleges-consumer-reports/#comments</comments>
    <pubDate>Tue, 28 Apr 2009 13:06:45 +0000</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>mcmilker</dc:creator>
    
		<category><![CDATA[Baby]]></category>

    <guid isPermaLink="false">http://ecochildsplay.com/2009/04/28/dont-buy-these-attachment-parenting-products-alleges-consumer-reports/</guid>
    <description><![CDATA[<h3><a href="http://ecochildsplay.com/files/2009/04/sling.jpg"><img class="alignnone size-medium wp-image-3659" src="http://go635254.s3.amazonaws.com/ecochildsplay/files/2009/04/sling-300x225.jpg" alt="" width="300" height="225" /></a>I was really upset when I read this article from Consumer Reports – <a href="http://blogs.consumerreports.org/safety/2009/04/unsafe-baby-products-bath-seats-slings-sleep-positioners-bumpers-cosleepers.html">Five products not to buy for your baby</a>!</h3>
<h3>Along with Baby bath seats, Crib bumper pads and Sleep positioners were listed two products near and dear to advocates of attachment parenting: Co-sleepers and Slings!</h3>
<p>Consumer Reports first blasts co-sleepers saying:</p>
<blockquote><p>Although sleeping with a baby in an adult bed is a common practice among some cultures, it can be dangerous. The new bassinet-like devices designed to go in between parents or alongside an adult bed don’t necessarily make co-sleeping with a baby safer… Currently, safety standards don’t exist for either co-sleepers or bedside sleepers. Until they do, we think the <a href="http://blogs.consumerreports.org/baby/2008/07/safer-sleeping.html">safest place for your baby to sleep</a> is in a crib.</p></blockquote>
<p>Then they go on to denigrate slings:</p>
<blockquote><p>Over the past five years, at least four babies died and there have been many reports of serious injury associated with the use of <a href="http://blogs.consumerreports.org/safety/2008/04/sling-carriers.html">sling-type carriers</a>. The incidents include skull fractures, head injuries, contusions and abrasions. Most occurred when the child fell out of the sling. As slings grow in popularity, so do the number of serious injuries. No safety standards exist for slings. We think you should skip the sling and opt for other types of infant carriers, which have safer track records.</p></blockquote>
<p><a href="http://ecochildsplay.com/2009/04/28/dont-buy-these-attachment-parenting-products-alleges-consumer-reports/" class="more-link">Read more of this story &#187;</a></p>
]]></description>
    <wfw:commentRss>http://ecochildsplay.com/2009/04/28/dont-buy-these-attachment-parenting-products-alleges-consumer-reports/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>Energy Star Ratings: Greenwashing or Double Standards?</title>
    <link>http://ecochildsplay.com/2008/09/10/energy-star-ratings-greenwashing-or-double-standards/</link>
    <comments>http://ecochildsplay.com/2008/09/10/energy-star-ratings-greenwashing-or-double-standards/#comments</comments>
    <pubDate>Thu, 11 Sep 2008 02:11:32 +0000</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Derek Markham</dc:creator>
    
		<category><![CDATA[Green Home and Green Cleaning]]></category>

    <guid isPermaLink="false">http://ecochildsplay.com/2008/09/10/energy-star-ratings-greenwashing-or-double-standards/</guid>
    <description><![CDATA[<h3><img class="alignright" style="float: right" src="http://go635254.s3.amazonaws.com/ecochildsplay/files/2008/09/energyguide300.jpg" alt="Energy Guide Label" width="300" height="414" /></h3>
<h3>You did your homework and bought an energy-efficient refrigerator.</h3>
<p><strong>It has the Energy Star rating, so you&#8217;re thinking that you might save some money on the electric bill and help to green your house by purchasing it.</strong></p>
<h3><strong>You might be wrong.</strong></h3>
<h3></h3>
<p>In the October issue of Consumer Reports, &#8220;<em>Save Energy, Save Money</em>&#8220;, an article entitled &#8220;<span><span><em>Energy Star has lost some luster</em>&#8221; has stirred up some controversy. Consumer Reports rated one refrigerator as using <strong>60% more electricity than the Energy Star label stated</strong>, and one, the </span></span><span><span>LG LMX25981ST French-door fridge, as using <strong>more than double the energy</strong> on the label. </span></span></p>
<p>It turns out that according to the Department of Energy (DOE) procedures for testing, <strong>the refrigerator&#8217;s ice machine should be turned off during the test</strong>. Turning off the ice maker on some models, like the one tested, also turns off the cooling to the ice-making compartment.</p>
<p><strong>Who buys a refrigerator with an ice-maker and then shuts it off?</strong>
<p><a href="http://ecochildsplay.com/2008/09/10/energy-star-ratings-greenwashing-or-double-standards/" class="more-link">Read more of this story &#187;</a></p>
]]></description>
    <wfw:commentRss>http://ecochildsplay.com/2008/09/10/energy-star-ratings-greenwashing-or-double-standards/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>Consumer Reports on Global Warming</title>
    <link>http://amystodghill.greenoptions.com/2007/04/24/consumer-reports-on-global-warming/</link>
    <comments>http://amystodghill.greenoptions.com/2007/04/24/consumer-reports-on-global-warming/#comments</comments>
    <pubDate>Tue, 24 Apr 2007 13:45:45 +0000</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Amy Stodghill</dc:creator>
    
    <guid isPermaLink="false">http://amystodghill.greenoptions.com/2007/04/24/consumer-reports-on-global-warming/</guid>
    <description><![CDATA[<p><img src="/files/images/examineearth_0.JPG" border="0" width="200" height="267" />Save money and fight global warming?  That&#39;s what <em>Consumer Reports</em> wants to help you do with GreenerChoices.org.  </p>
<p>Launched in conjunction with Earth Day, <a href="http://www.greenerchoices.org/home.cfm">GreenerChoices.org</a> features some of your typical <em>Consumer Reports</em> fare (with a green twist)  including green buying guides for appliances, cars, electronics, food and home goods.  For example, the <a href="http://www.greenerchoices.org/electronicsrecycling/el_computers.cfm">computers page</a> gives background information on toxics in electronics and e-waste stats, in addition to tips on buying new and whether you should &#34;fix it or nix it&#34;.  </p>
<p>Another draw is the Global Warming Solutions Center that lays out simple solutions everyone can take <a href="http://www.greenerchoices.org/globalwarmingathome.cfm">at home</a> and <a href="http://www.greenerchoices.org/globalwarmingonroad.cfm">on the road</a> to reduce the individual carbon footprint. </p>
<p><!--break-->Most of the static information on GreenerChoices.org is contained within a blog, so unless you&#39;re clicking on featured tips from the home page, there are a couple of extra clicks involved to get to the heart of some of the information. Other links navigate away from the consumer reports site altogether.  But overall, GreenerChoices.org does serve as a green guide 101 with many helpful tips, information and things to think about for consumers who want to make some greener choices.</p>
<p>Via <a href="http://www.greenbiz.com/news/news_third.cfm?NewsID=34943">GreenBiz</a>; <em><a href="http://www.greenerchoices.org/home.cfm">Consumer Reports</a></em></p>
]]></description>
    <wfw:commentRss>http://amystodghill.greenoptions.com/2007/04/24/consumer-reports-on-global-warming/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
  </item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- 184 queries in 0.531 seconds. -->