<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
  xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
  xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
  >

<channel>
  <title>Green Options &#187; contraceptives</title>
  <link>http://greenoptions.com/tag/contraceptives</link>
  <description>Posts tagged 'contraceptives'</description>
  <pubDate>Mon, 30 Mar 2009 02:28:38 +0000</pubDate>
  <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
  <language>en</language>
  <item>
    <title>China Tries to Control &#8216;Plague&#8217; of Pikas with Contraceptives</title>
    <link>http://ecoworldly.com/2009/03/30/china-tries-to-control-plague-of-pikas-with-contraceptives/</link>
    <comments>http://ecoworldly.com/2009/03/30/china-tries-to-control-plague-of-pikas-with-contraceptives/#comments</comments>
    <pubDate>Mon, 30 Mar 2009 02:28:38 +0000</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>The Guardian Environment Network</dc:creator>
    
		<category><![CDATA[About Animals]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[In Asia]]></category>

    <guid isPermaLink="false">http://ecoworldly.com/2009/03/30/china-tries-to-control-plague-of-pikas-with-contraceptives/</guid>
    <description><![CDATA[<h3><a href="http://ecoworldly.com/files/2009/03/pika.jpg"><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-2624" src="http://go635254.s3.amazonaws.com/ecoworldly/files/2009/03/pika.jpg" alt="Pika" width="500" height="375" /></a>The pika, a relation of the rabbit, is blamed for desertification. <a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/china">China</a>&#8217;s authorities have scattered 200kg of rodent contraceptive pellets across the Tibetan plateau to control what they describe as a &#8220;plague of desert rats&#8221;.</h3>
<p><a href="http://ecoworldly.com/2009/03/30/china-tries-to-control-plague-of-pikas-with-contraceptives/" class="more-link">Read more of this story &#187;</a></p>
]]></description>
    <wfw:commentRss>http://ecoworldly.com/2009/03/30/china-tries-to-control-plague-of-pikas-with-contraceptives/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>Utah Legislature Votes to Limit Birth Control&#8230; for Animals</title>
    <link>http://planetsave.com/blog/2009/02/05/utah-legislature-votes-to-limit-birth-control-for-animals/</link>
    <comments>http://planetsave.com/blog/2009/02/05/utah-legislature-votes-to-limit-birth-control-for-animals/#comments</comments>
    <pubDate>Thu, 05 Feb 2009 05:48:12 +0000</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Alex Felsinger</dc:creator>
    
		<category><![CDATA[Anti-Environmentalism]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Legislation]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

    <guid isPermaLink="false">http://planetsave.com/blog/2009/02/05/utah-legislature-votes-to-limit-birth-control-for-animals/</guid>
    <description><![CDATA[<h3><a href="http://planetsave.com/files/2009/02/femaledeer.jpg"><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-3935" src="http://go635254.s3.amazonaws.com/planetsave/files/2009/02/femaledeer.jpg" alt="" width="500" height="333" /></a></h3>
<h3>If I didn&#8217;t know any better, I&#8217;d congratulate Utah republicans for at least being consistent in their <a href="http://blog.seattletimes.nwsource.com/edcetera/2008/11/06/most_liberal_most_conservative.html" target="_blank">ultra-conservative</a>, <a href="http://newsnet.byu.edu/story.cfm/69644" target="_blank">anti-choice</a> beliefs by spreading it to all species. But alas, that was not the intention of this new law.</h3>

<p>They&#8217;ve preemptively passed a law to stop animal rights activists from distributing birth control to deer populations in order to bring their population down below the legal level for hunting to be allowed. While this has never happened before, it&#8217;s a common fear that activists will someday destroy hunters&#8217; &#8220;way of life.&#8221;</p>
<p><a href="http://planetsave.com/blog/2009/02/05/utah-legislature-votes-to-limit-birth-control-for-animals/" class="more-link">Read more of this story &#187;</a></p>
]]></description>
    <wfw:commentRss>http://planetsave.com/blog/2009/02/05/utah-legislature-votes-to-limit-birth-control-for-animals/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>Earth Policy Institute: Moving to a Stable World Population</title>
    <link>http://sustainablog.org/2009/01/22/earth-policy-institute-moving-to-a-stable-world-population/</link>
    <comments>http://sustainablog.org/2009/01/22/earth-policy-institute-moving-to-a-stable-world-population/#comments</comments>
    <pubDate>Thu, 22 Jan 2009 20:17:08 +0000</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Earth Policy Institute</dc:creator>
    
		<category><![CDATA[Education]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Health]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[International]]></category>

    <guid isPermaLink="false">http://sustainablog.org/2009/01/22/earth-policy-institute-moving-to-a-stable-world-population/</guid>
    <description><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://sustainablog.org/files/2009/01/crowd.jpg"><img class="alignleft size-full wp-image-4081" src="http://go635254.s3.amazonaws.com/sustainablog/files/2009/01/crowd.jpg" alt="crowd of people" width="307" height="308" /></a>By Lester R. Brown</p>
<h3>Some 43 countries around the world now have populations that are either essentially stable or declining slowly. In countries with the lowest fertility rates, including Japan, Russia, Germany, and Italy, populations will likely decline somewhat over the next half-century. A larger group of countries has reduced fertility to the replacement level or just below.</h3>
<p>They are headed for population stability after large numbers of young people move through their reproductive years. Included in this group are China and the United States. A third group of countries is projected to more than double their populations by 2050, including Ethiopia, the Democratic Republic of the Congo, and Uganda.</p>
<p>United Nations projections show world population growth under three different assumptions about fertility levels. The medium projection, the one most commonly used, has world population reaching 9.2 billion by 2050. The high one reaches 10.8 billion. The low projection, which assumes that the world will quickly move below replacement-level fertility to 1.6 children per couple, has population peaking at just under 8 billion in 2041 and then declining. If the goal is to eradicate poverty, hunger, and illiteracy, and lessen pressures on already strained natural resources, we have little choice but to strive for the lower projection.</p>
<p>Slowing world population growth means that all women who want to plan their families should have access to the family planning services they need. Unfortunately, at present 201 million couples cannot obtain the services they need. Former U.S. Agency for International Development official J. Joseph Speidel notes that “if you ask anthropologists who live and work with poor people at the village level&#8230;they often say that women live in fear of their next pregnancy. They just do not want to get pregnant.” Filling the family planning gap may be the most urgent item on the global agenda. The benefits are enormous and the costs are minimal.</p>
<p><a href="http://sustainablog.org/2009/01/22/earth-policy-institute-moving-to-a-stable-world-population/" class="more-link">Read more of this story &#187;</a></p>
]]></description>
    <wfw:commentRss>http://sustainablog.org/2009/01/22/earth-policy-institute-moving-to-a-stable-world-population/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>Odd-ball, Weird or Funny, but Spermicide Coke Wins Alternative Nobel Prize</title>
    <link>http://ecoworldly.com/2008/10/06/odd-ball-weird-or-funny-but-spermicide-coke-wins-alternative-nobel-prize/</link>
    <comments>http://ecoworldly.com/2008/10/06/odd-ball-weird-or-funny-but-spermicide-coke-wins-alternative-nobel-prize/#comments</comments>
    <pubDate>Mon, 06 Oct 2008 10:57:51 +0000</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Sam Aola Ooko</dc:creator>
    
		<category><![CDATA[In Global]]></category>

    <guid isPermaLink="false">http://ecoworldly.com/2008/10/06/odd-ball-weird-or-funny-but-spermicide-coke-wins-alternative-nobel-prize/</guid>
    <description><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://ecoworldly.com/files/2008/10/coke.jpg"><img class="alignnone size-full wp-image-1785" src="http://go635254.s3.amazonaws.com/ecoworldly/files/2008/10/coke.jpg" alt="Odd-ball, Weird or Funny, but Spermicide Coke Wins Alternative Nobel Prize" width="500" height="188" /></a> Odd-ball green news it may be but Coke has been discovered to be an effective spermicide, which may be good for the environment; and for that very elaborate effort of discovery, a woman&#8217;s sexuality expert has just been awarded an alternative Nobel Prize for Chemistry.</p>
<p>Weird or wacky, you might say, but rumor actually has it that Snopes.com might soon bring down <a href="http://www.snopes.com/cokelore/sperm.asp">this link</a> that debunked the long suspected (was it an urban legend until the <a href="http://improbable.com/ig/">Ig Nobel Prize</a>?) but <a href="http://tafkac.org/products/coca-cola/coke_douche_la_times.html">now confirmed</a> sperm killing effects of the famous Coca Cola soft drink.</p>
<p><a href="http://ecoworldly.com/2008/10/06/odd-ball-weird-or-funny-but-spermicide-coke-wins-alternative-nobel-prize/" class="more-link">Read more of this story &#187;</a></p>
]]></description>
    <wfw:commentRss>http://ecoworldly.com/2008/10/06/odd-ball-weird-or-funny-but-spermicide-coke-wins-alternative-nobel-prize/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>Korean Women Say Birth Control is &#8216;Men&#8217;s Responsibility&#8217;</title>
    <link>http://ecoworldly.com/2008/09/27/korean-women-say-birth-control-not-my-job/</link>
    <comments>http://ecoworldly.com/2008/09/27/korean-women-say-birth-control-not-my-job/#comments</comments>
    <pubDate>Sat, 27 Sep 2008 16:00:47 +0000</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Gavin Hudson</dc:creator>
    
		<category><![CDATA[In Asia]]></category>

    <guid isPermaLink="false">http://ecoworldly.com/2008/09/27/korean-women-say-birth-control-not-my-job/</guid>
    <description><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://ecoworldly.com/files/2008/09/pregnancy.jpg"><img class="alignleft size-full wp-image-1708" src="http://go635254.s3.amazonaws.com/ecoworldly/files/2008/09/pregnancy.jpg" alt="pregnancy" width="250" height="333" /></a></p>
<h3>Birth control has become an important issue for woman&#8217;s rights as well as the environment. However, a survey of South Korean women age 19-34 found 45% believe contraception should be a man&#8217;s responsibility.</h3>
<p>The survey, by the <a href="http://www.piim.or.kr/" target="_blank">Study Group for Contraception</a>, shows that most women are doing little or nothing to avoid unwanted pregnancies. Of the 1000 women who participated in the survey, one in five said she relied on coitus interruptus or timing pregnancy cycles as a form of birth control. Both methods have high failure rates of around 25%.</p>
<p>What&#8217;s more, abortion is illegal in South Korea, except under extenuating circumstances. The result is an almost entirely first-world country where each year hundreds of thousands of women practice illegal abortions at &#8220;don&#8217;t ask don&#8217;t tell&#8221; clinics.</p>
<p><a href="http://ecoworldly.com/2008/09/27/korean-women-say-birth-control-not-my-job/" class="more-link">Read more of this story &#187;</a></p>
]]></description>
    <wfw:commentRss>http://ecoworldly.com/2008/09/27/korean-women-say-birth-control-not-my-job/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>Early Use Of Contraceptives Poses Higher Cancer Risks</title>
    <link>http://ecoworldly.com/2008/07/10/early-use-of-contraceptives-poses-higher-cancer-risks/</link>
    <comments>http://ecoworldly.com/2008/07/10/early-use-of-contraceptives-poses-higher-cancer-risks/#comments</comments>
    <pubDate>Thu, 10 Jul 2008 19:53:12 +0000</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Reenita Malhotra</dc:creator>
    
		<category><![CDATA[In Asia]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[In Global]]></category>

    <guid isPermaLink="false">http://ecoworldly.com/2008/07/10/early-use-of-contraceptives-poses-higher-cancer-risks/</guid>
    <description><![CDATA[<p>Pett Corby, the author of e-book, ‘How to Avoid Unplanned Pregnancy Every Time You Have Sex - WITHOUT Using Contraceptive Drugs’ has recently launched a web based awareness campaign on the subject.</p>
<h3>Contraceptives Are Likely to Endanger the Health of Early Users</h3>
<p>Reproductive health is recognized as a human right. According to the United Nations, it is part of an individual’s right to health.  However, according to Pett Corby, hardly anyone knows to avoid unplanned pregnancy by using natural methods. Young women who fall pregnant routinely undergo abortions and resort to the use of contraceptive drugs with dangerous side-effects. According to a study of early contraceptive use conducted Sweden in 1991, the risk of developing breast cancer was 820% higher in women who started using the pill before the age of 20, than for healthy non-users of the same age. Early use of the contraceptive pill is also associated with a increased risk for cervical cancer.</p>
<p><a href="http://ecoworldly.com/2008/07/10/early-use-of-contraceptives-poses-higher-cancer-risks/" class="more-link">Read more of this story &#187;</a></p>
]]></description>
    <wfw:commentRss>http://ecoworldly.com/2008/07/10/early-use-of-contraceptives-poses-higher-cancer-risks/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
  </item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- 257 queries in 0.966 seconds. -->