<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
  xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
  xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
  xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
>

<channel>
  <title>Green Options &#187; cool</title>
  <link>http://greenoptions.com/tag/cool</link>
  <description>Posts tagged 'cool'</description>
  <pubDate>Thu, 13 Dec 2007 18:48:25 +0000</pubDate>
  <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
  <language>en</language>
  <item>
    <title>Electric Eel Lights Christmas Tree</title>
    <link>http://planetsave.com/blog/2007/12/13/electric-eel-lights-christmas-tree/</link>
    <comments>http://planetsave.com/blog/2007/12/13/electric-eel-lights-christmas-tree/#comments</comments>
    <pubDate>Thu, 13 Dec 2007 18:48:25 +0000</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Max Lindberg</dc:creator>
    
    <guid isPermaLink="false">http://ps.greenoptions.com/blog/2007/12/13/electric-eel-lights-christmas-tree/</guid>
    <description><![CDATA[<p><a href='http://planetsave.com/files/2007/12/electriceel.jpg' title='electriceel.jpg'><img src='http://planetsave.com/files/2007/12/electriceel.jpg' alt='electriceel.jpg' /></a>I couldn&#8217;t pass this one up.  That ugly little fellow in the Reuters photo is an electric eel, and it&#8217;s powering lights for a Christmas tree in a Japanese Aquarium.</p>
<p>In a video from Reuters Television, which is available at the bottom of this story, two aluminum panels inside the eel&#8217;s tank act as electrodes, capturing the power needed to light the tree.  Kazuhiko Minawa, who thought up the idea, spent two months devising a system that would capture the animal&#8217;s electric power.</p>
<p>Eel&#8217;s use electricity to fend off threats to their well-being, or getting a bite to eat.  Actually, the eel isn&#8217;t an eel at all, it&#8217;s a fish, more commonly known as the Knifefish, a relative of the catfish family.  <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Electric_eel ">Wikipedia</a> says the fish is an obligate air-breather, rising to the surface about every 10 minutes for a gulp of air and then returns to the bottom.</p>
<p>When hunting, or defending themselves, eels can produce electrical shocks of up to 500 volts and 1 ampere of current, enough to do serious, or even fatal harm to a human.  That&#8217;s why they wind up in public aquariums and not the home fish tank.  You&#8217;d need a pretty large one at that, they can grow up to eight feet in length and weigh 40 pounds.</p>
<p>Back to our Japanese aquarium.  The eel-Christmas tree inventor told Reuters Television that gathering all electric eels from around the world would light one very large Christmas tree.</p>
<p>Video of Eel-powered Christmas tree from <a href="http://www.reuters.com/news/video?videoId=72584&amp;videoChannel=4">Reuters Video</a>.</p>
]]></description>
    <content:encoded><![CDATA[I couldn't pass this one up.  That ugly little fellow in the Reuters photo is an electric eel, and it's powering lights for a Christmas tree in a Japanese Aquarium.

In a video from Reuters Television, which is available at the bottom of this story, two aluminum panels inside the eel's tank act as electrodes, capturing the power needed to light the tree.  Kazuhiko Minawa, who thought up the idea, spent two months devising a system that would capture the animal's electric power.

Eel's use electricity to fend off threats to their well-being, or getting a bite to eat.  Actually, the eel isn't an eel at all, it's a fish, more commonly known as the Knifefish, a relative of the catfish family.  Wikipedia [1] says the fish is an obligate air-breather, rising to the surface about every 10 minutes for a gulp of air and then returns to the bottom.

When hunting, or defending themselves, eels can produce electrical shocks of up to 500 volts and 1 ampere of current, enough to do serious, or even fatal harm to a human.  That's why they wind up in public aquariums and not the home fish tank.  You'd need a pretty large one at that, they can grow up to eight feet in length and weigh 40 pounds.

Back to our Japanese aquarium.  The eel-Christmas tree inventor told Reuters Television that gathering all electric eels from around the world would light one very large Christmas tree.

Video of Eel-powered Christmas tree from Reuters Video [2].

[1] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Electric_eel 
[2] http://www.reuters.com/news/video?videoId=72584&#38;videoChannel=4]]></content:encoded>
    <wfw:commentRss>http://planetsave.com/blog/2007/12/13/electric-eel-lights-christmas-tree/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>Podcast Interview with an Eco-Stressed Santa Claus</title>
    <link>http://planetsave.com/blog/2007/12/12/podcast-interview-with-an-eco-stressed-santa-claus/</link>
    <comments>http://planetsave.com/blog/2007/12/12/podcast-interview-with-an-eco-stressed-santa-claus/#comments</comments>
    <pubDate>Wed, 12 Dec 2007 18:49:19 +0000</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Max Lindberg</dc:creator>
    
		<category><![CDATA[Podcast]]></category>

    <guid isPermaLink="false">http://ps.greenoptions.com/blog/2007/12/12/podcast-interview-with-an-eco-stressed-santa-claus/</guid>
    <description><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://planetsave.com/files/2007/12/santa-claus.jpg" title="santa-claus.jpg"><img src="http://planetsave.com/files/2007/12/santa-claus.jpg" alt="santa-claus.jpg" /></a>It&#8217;s finally happened, good old St Nick is beginning to buckle under to the stresses of an over-abundance of controls and regulations.  The jolly old elf just isn&#8217;t that jolly anymore, and he explains why in this <a href="http://www.thelindbergreport.org">interview</a>.</p>
]]></description>
    <content:encoded><![CDATA[ [1]It's finally happened, good old St Nick is beginning to buckle under to the stresses of an over-abundance of controls and regulations.  The jolly old elf just isn't that jolly anymore, and he explains why in this interview [2].

[1] http://planetsave.com/files/2007/12/santa-claus.jpg
[2] http://www.thelindbergreport.org]]></content:encoded>
    <wfw:commentRss>http://planetsave.com/blog/2007/12/12/podcast-interview-with-an-eco-stressed-santa-claus/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>What&#8217;s In A Name?  Fjuckby, For Instance?</title>
    <link>http://planetsave.com/blog/2007/12/07/whats-in-a-name-fjuckby-for-instance/</link>
    <comments>http://planetsave.com/blog/2007/12/07/whats-in-a-name-fjuckby-for-instance/#comments</comments>
    <pubDate>Fri, 07 Dec 2007 16:29:56 +0000</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Max Lindberg</dc:creator>
    
    <guid isPermaLink="false">http://ps.greenoptions.com/blog/2007/12/07/whats-in-a-name-fjuckby-for-instance/</guid>
    <description><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://planetsave.com/files/2007/12/fjuckby.jpg" title="fjuckby.jpg"><img src="http://planetsave.com/files/2007/12/fjuckby.jpg" alt="fjuckby.jpg" align="left" /></a>Well, the residents of that Swedish community have been fighting with the National Heritage Board for a new name, or at least a return to the old name.  Globalization has apparently led to rude English-language associations that residents of this small community could live without.</p>
<p>The whole thing apparently started in the 1930&#8217;s when the spelling of the name changed from Fjukeby.  Embarrassed and finally tired of all the jocularity, a committee of residents pleaded with the National Heritage Board for the change.</p>
<p>So what&#8217;s the fuss?  Well, according to the article in <a href="http://www.thelocal.se/5795/20061214/">The Local</a> a Swedish English-language website, the Swedish word &#8220;juck&#8221;, essentially means the same thing as Fjuckby&#8217;s English component.  In addition, villagers complained that the present name makes it difficult to sell property there, or run a successful business.</p>
<p>According to <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fjuckby">Wikipedia</a>,  , the town is located about 15km north of Uppsala.   The name has apparently resulted in a certain amount of tourist trade to the small community.  That hasn&#8217;t helped the situation at all.</p>
<p>Unfortunately, the National Heritage Board said it was following the recommendation of the Institute of Language and Folklore to preserve the name Fjuckby.  Which begs the question, if it was named Fjukeby in the 30&#8217;s, why was it changed, and what&#8217;s wrong with changing it back?</p>
<p>Oh, Fjuckby has a population of about 60, and only 15 residents were involved in the petition for a name change.  In it&#8217;s ruling, The NHB apparently felt they did not represent the majority of residents in the town.</p>
<p>A writer for The Local ended the story with this observation; &#8220;If Fjuckby gets its way it is conceivable that Anusviken, Arslet and Dicken may be next in line for a swift reversal of misfortune&#8221;.</p>
<p>In case you&#8217;re wondering, Fjuckby and Fjukeby both roughly translate as &#8220;Windy Village&#8221;.</p>
]]></description>
    <content:encoded><![CDATA[ [1]Well, the residents of that Swedish community have been fighting with the National Heritage Board for a new name, or at least a return to the old name.  Globalization has apparently led to rude English-language associations that residents of this small community could live without.

The whole thing apparently started in the 1930's when the spelling of the name changed from Fjukeby.  Embarrassed and finally tired of all the jocularity, a committee of residents pleaded with the National Heritage Board for the change.

So what's the fuss?  Well, according to the article in The Local [2] a Swedish English-language website, the Swedish word "juck", essentially means the same thing as Fjuckby's English component.  In addition, villagers complained that the present name makes it difficult to sell property there, or run a successful business.

According to Wikipedia [3],  , the town is located about 15km north of Uppsala.   The name has apparently resulted in a certain amount of tourist trade to the small community.  That hasn't helped the situation at all.

Unfortunately, the National Heritage Board said it was following the recommendation of the Institute of Language and Folklore to preserve the name Fjuckby.  Which begs the question, if it was named Fjukeby in the 30's, why was it changed, and what's wrong with changing it back?

Oh, Fjuckby has a population of about 60, and only 15 residents were involved in the petition for a name change.  In it's ruling, The NHB apparently felt they did not represent the majority of residents in the town.

A writer for The Local ended the story with this observation; "If Fjuckby gets its way it is conceivable that Anusviken, Arslet and Dicken may be next in line for a swift reversal of misfortune".

In case you're wondering, Fjuckby and Fjukeby both roughly translate as "Windy Village".

[1] http://planetsave.com/files/2007/12/fjuckby.jpg
[2] http://www.thelocal.se/5795/20061214/
[3] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fjuckby]]></content:encoded>
    <wfw:commentRss>http://planetsave.com/blog/2007/12/07/whats-in-a-name-fjuckby-for-instance/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>Cooking Oil Powers Jet Plane</title>
    <link>http://planetsave.com/blog/2007/12/01/cooking-oil-powers-jet-plane/</link>
    <comments>http://planetsave.com/blog/2007/12/01/cooking-oil-powers-jet-plane/#comments</comments>
    <pubDate>Sat, 01 Dec 2007 20:28:49 +0000</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Max Lindberg</dc:creator>
    
    <guid isPermaLink="false">http://ps.greenoptions.com/blog/2007/12/01/cooking-oil-powers-jet-plane/</guid>
    <description><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://planetsave.com/files/2007/12/biojet1.jpg" title="biojet1.jpg"><img src="http://planetsave.com/files/2007/12/biojet1.jpg" alt="biojet1.jpg" /></a>They loaded up the fuel tanks with fresh canola oil refined to biodiesel, started the engines, and the 1968 L-29 Czechoslovakian jet, nicknamed <a href="http://www.sciam.com/article.cfm?id=biodiesel-takes-to-the-sky">BioJet 1</a>, soared into the sky from a Reno, NV airport.  It&#8217;s the first recorded time that a jet plane used biodiesel as a fuel.</p>
<p>It was a three minute flight, revving the engines to 98 percent of capacity, but certainly enough to be a nonissue in climb performance and time to attain altitude.</p>
<p>The jet was acquired from the Ukrainian military and is one of the few planes capable of using biodiesel.  It has a built-in fuel warming system that keeps biodiesel fluid at colder temperatures.</p>
<p>Doug Rodante, president of <a href="http://greenflightinternational.com/">Green Flight International</a> said a 20 percent blend of biodiesel and normal jet fuel would work perfectly well in other jet aircraft without modifications.  That would mean fewer emissions of carbon dioxide by as much a 50 percent.</p>
<p>Tests are continuing at Green Flight and the jet has been grounded by the Federal Aviation Administration for until proved safe to fly long distances.  Once done, Rodante plans to fly the jet from Reno, Nev to Orlando, FL in eight stops.  After that, he hopes to fly a similarly fueled plane around the world.</p>
]]></description>
    <content:encoded><![CDATA[ [1]They loaded up the fuel tanks with fresh canola oil refined to biodiesel, started the engines, and the 1968 L-29 Czechoslovakian jet, nicknamed BioJet 1 [2], soared into the sky from a Reno, NV airport.  It's the first recorded time that a jet plane used biodiesel as a fuel.

It was a three minute flight, revving the engines to 98 percent of capacity, but certainly enough to be a nonissue in climb performance and time to attain altitude.

The jet was acquired from the Ukrainian military and is one of the few planes capable of using biodiesel.  It has a built-in fuel warming system that keeps biodiesel fluid at colder temperatures.

Doug Rodante, president of Green Flight International [3] said a 20 percent blend of biodiesel and normal jet fuel would work perfectly well in other jet aircraft without modifications.  That would mean fewer emissions of carbon dioxide by as much a 50 percent.

Tests are continuing at Green Flight and the jet has been grounded by the Federal Aviation Administration for until proved safe to fly long distances.  Once done, Rodante plans to fly the jet from Reno, Nev to Orlando, FL in eight stops.  After that, he hopes to fly a similarly fueled plane around the world.

[1] http://planetsave.com/files/2007/12/biojet1.jpg
[2] http://www.sciam.com/article.cfm?id=biodiesel-takes-to-the-sky
[3] http://greenflightinternational.com/]]></content:encoded>
    <wfw:commentRss>http://planetsave.com/blog/2007/12/01/cooking-oil-powers-jet-plane/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>Christmas Tree or No?  Plastic or Real?  Another Christmas, More Choices.</title>
    <link>http://planetsave.com/blog/2007/11/29/christmas-tree-or-no-plastic-or-real-another-christmas-more-choices/</link>
    <comments>http://planetsave.com/blog/2007/11/29/christmas-tree-or-no-plastic-or-real-another-christmas-more-choices/#comments</comments>
    <pubDate>Thu, 29 Nov 2007 09:59:24 +0000</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Max Lindberg</dc:creator>
    
    <guid isPermaLink="false">http://ps.greenoptions.com/blog/2007/11/29/christmas-tree-or-no-plastic-or-real-another-christmas-more-choices/</guid>
    <description><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://planetsave.com/files/2007/11/christmastree.jpg" title="christmastree.jpg"><img src="http://planetsave.com/files/2007/11/christmastree.jpg" alt="christmastree.jpg" /></a>We hadn&#8217;t finished eating leftover turkey from Thanksgiving when Sally began decorating our new apartment for Christmas.   She enjoys the season, and every year right after Thanksgiving, the decorations come out again.</p>
<p>Over coffee this morning, we were discussing whether to have a Christmas tree this year.  We haven&#8217;t had one since our marriage, deciding instead on Sally&#8217;s ability to decorate with style and grace.  During our talk, we did discuss the difference between natural and plastic, and really didn&#8217;t decide on which we&#8217;d choose if we were going to have a tree in the first place.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s a wonderful time of the year, and this will be my 76th Christmas.  I&#8217;ve seen a lot of changes over the years, and have had some beautiful Christmas trees, some really pathetic ones, and quite a few years with none.  What I remember most about Christmas trees, besides the wonderful aroma of a fresh-cut tree, is the first time I saw an artificial one.</p>
<p>Some tree.  It was a stick with holes in it, and a bunch of &#8220;limbs&#8221; covered with plastic needles that you put together and then placed in a stand to look like a real tree.  Well, almost.  It took a lot of tinsel, angel hair, ornamental balls and an extra string of lights to even begin looking like the real thing.</p>
<p>Most everyone I knew was appalled &#8212; who could possibly call it &#8220;Christmas&#8221; without a real tree? Talk about snobbery!  Plastic became more popular though, and as the years rolled on they began looking better and better, but, still plastic.  Oh, and I forgot the silver aluminum trees that were introduced in the 60&#8217;s.  Then came the realization that some families just can&#8217;t afford a real tree every year, and suddenly artificial made a lot of sense.  Besides, there&#8217;s the convenience of not having to vacuum all the needles and dispose of the tree.  Just disassemble and store in the closet until next year.</p>
<p>Out of curiosity, I decided to stop at one of those Christmas tree stands operated by a non-profit organization, and price a tree, just for the heck of it.  My God, they&#8217;re $50 and up.  Plastic suddenly looked a little better, although artifical can be very expensive too.</p>
<p>Then we discussed the merits of having a natural or plastic tree when it came to considerations of health. The natural tree won hands down, as long as you don&#8217;t let it dry out and catch fire.  Artifical trees catch, and retain dust, and if you keep them for years, that&#8217;s a lot of dust released everytime they&#8217;re used.  When we&#8217;re finished with them, where do they go?  Probably to the local landfill to while away the long years before finally breaking down.</p>
<p>If we chose a natural tree, is it environmentally cool to cut down trees for the sake of a few weeks or days of decoration?  We all know that trees help clean the air and provide habitat for wildlife, but are we losing large forest areas?  Absolutely not, say growers.  Most trees come from Christmas-tree farms, and once harvested, new trees are planted and the cycle begins all over again.</p>
<p>So what are you having this year, plastic or natural?  We&#8217;ll be treeless, but warm, snug and very happy in our home above beautiful downtown Tucson.</p>
<p>Whatever the case, Sally and Max Lindberg wish you a Merry Christmas, and a Happy New Year!</p>
]]></description>
    <content:encoded><![CDATA[ [1]We hadn't finished eating leftover turkey from Thanksgiving when Sally began decorating our new apartment for Christmas.   She enjoys the season, and every year right after Thanksgiving, the decorations come out again.

Over coffee this morning, we were discussing whether to have a Christmas tree this year.  We haven't had one since our marriage, deciding instead on Sally's ability to decorate with style and grace.  During our talk, we did discuss the difference between natural and plastic, and really didn't decide on which we'd choose if we were going to have a tree in the first place.

It's a wonderful time of the year, and this will be my 76th Christmas.  I've seen a lot of changes over the years, and have had some beautiful Christmas trees, some really pathetic ones, and quite a few years with none.  What I remember most about Christmas trees, besides the wonderful aroma of a fresh-cut tree, is the first time I saw an artificial one.

Some tree.  It was a stick with holes in it, and a bunch of "limbs" covered with plastic needles that you put together and then placed in a stand to look like a real tree.  Well, almost.  It took a lot of tinsel, angel hair, ornamental balls and an extra string of lights to even begin looking like the real thing.

Most everyone I knew was appalled -- who could possibly call it "Christmas" without a real tree? Talk about snobbery!  Plastic became more popular though, and as the years rolled on they began looking better and better, but, still plastic.  Oh, and I forgot the silver aluminum trees that were introduced in the 60's.  Then came the realization that some families just can't afford a real tree every year, and suddenly artificial made a lot of sense.  Besides, there's the convenience of not having to vacuum all the needles and dispose of the tree.  Just disassemble and store in the closet until next year.

Out of curiosity, I decided to stop at one of those Christmas tree stands operated by a non-profit organization, and price a tree, just for the heck of it.  My God, they're $50 and up.  Plastic suddenly looked a little better, although artifical can be very expensive too.

Then we discussed the merits of having a natural or plastic tree when it came to considerations of health. The natural tree won hands down, as long as you don't let it dry out and catch fire.  Artifical trees catch, and retain dust, and if you keep them for years, that's a lot of dust released everytime they're used.  When we're finished with them, where do they go?  Probably to the local landfill to while away the long years before finally breaking down.

If we chose a natural tree, is it environmentally cool to cut down trees for the sake of a few weeks or days of decoration?  We all know that trees help clean the air and provide habitat for wildlife, but are we losing large forest areas?  Absolutely not, say growers.  Most trees come from Christmas-tree farms, and once harvested, new trees are planted and the cycle begins all over again.

So what are you having this year, plastic or natural?  We'll be treeless, but warm, snug and very happy in our home above beautiful downtown Tucson.

Whatever the case, Sally and Max Lindberg wish you a Merry Christmas, and a Happy New Year!

[1] http://planetsave.com/files/2007/11/christmastree.jpg]]></content:encoded>
    <wfw:commentRss>http://planetsave.com/blog/2007/11/29/christmas-tree-or-no-plastic-or-real-another-christmas-more-choices/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>Will Honesty Win The Presidency?</title>
    <link>http://planetsave.com/blog/2007/11/21/will-honesty-win-the-presidency/</link>
    <comments>http://planetsave.com/blog/2007/11/21/will-honesty-win-the-presidency/#comments</comments>
    <pubDate>Wed, 21 Nov 2007 05:54:51 +0000</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Max Lindberg</dc:creator>
    
		<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

    <guid isPermaLink="false">http://ps.greenoptions.com/blog/2007/11/21/will-honesty-win-the-presidency/</guid>
    <description><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://planetsave.com/files/2007/11/obamadrink1.jpg" title="obamadrink1.jpg"><img src="http://planetsave.com/files/2007/11/obamadrink1.jpg" alt="obamadrink1.jpg" align="left" height="183" width="257" /></a>I love an honest man, and Presidential hopeful Sen. Barack Obama (D-IL) is on the top of my list, after his appearance at a Manchester, NH high school.  When asked about his high school days he openly admitted to being a &#8220;pot head,&#8221; who experimented with drugs and alcohol.</p>
<p>Obama attended high school in Hawaii, and he admitted to not applying himself and choosing to have a good time. He was trying to find some identity, and used drugs, to &#8220;push questions of who I was out of my mind, something that could flatten out the landscape of my heart, blur the edges of my memory.&#8221;as he said in his book, &#8220;<a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dreams_from_My_Father">Dreams From My Father</a>,&#8221;  It was after he began his college education that Obama recognized he&#8217;d wasted a lot of time.</p>
<p>&#8220;Junkie.  Pothead.  That&#8217;s where I&#8217;d been headed:  the final fatal role of the young would be black man,&#8221; another quote from his book.  He also admitted snorting cocaine when he could afford it, but mostly drank alcohol and smoked weed.</p>
<p>I dare any presidential candidate to be that candid and honest in this very contentious race for the Presidency.  Will it hurt Obama?  Probably not. It&#8217;s already a well-known fact, regardless; I&#8217;m sure it&#8217;ll be used against him.  Politicians can be a vicious sort, but we already knew that.</p>
<p>My concern is about the students he addressed, and how they will relate to Obama.  It has been my personal experience that hearing someone talk about how they cleaned up their act while I was still doing mine, sounded great. It gave me the false confidence that someday, I too, could clean up mine.  The fact is there may not be another chance.  All it would take is one more time &#8220;out there&#8221; and death will come before freedom.  I was among the lucky ones, and with the Grace of God can talk about it today.</p>
<p>The insidious nature of drugs is simply this, some folks never clean up, young people die everyday thinking that someday, soon, they will turn their lives around.  I&#8217;ve personally seen it happen on several occasions.  I sincerely hope Obama&#8217;s message to the young people was positive, that those who are involved with drugs and alcohol understand it is a one-way street, and decide now to walk away and get serious about their lives.</p>
<p><a href="www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D8T1IPAG0">Source</a></p>
]]></description>
    <content:encoded><![CDATA[ [1]I love an honest man, and Presidential hopeful Sen. Barack Obama (D-IL) is on the top of my list, after his appearance at a Manchester, NH high school.  When asked about his high school days he openly admitted to being a "pot head," who experimented with drugs and alcohol.

Obama attended high school in Hawaii, and he admitted to not applying himself and choosing to have a good time. He was trying to find some identity, and used drugs, to "push questions of who I was out of my mind, something that could flatten out the landscape of my heart, blur the edges of my memory."as he said in his book, "Dreams From My Father [2],"  It was after he began his college education that Obama recognized he'd wasted a lot of time.

"Junkie.  Pothead.  That's where I'd been headed:  the final fatal role of the young would be black man," another quote from his book.  He also admitted snorting cocaine when he could afford it, but mostly drank alcohol and smoked weed.

I dare any presidential candidate to be that candid and honest in this very contentious race for the Presidency.  Will it hurt Obama?  Probably not. It's already a well-known fact, regardless; I'm sure it'll be used against him.  Politicians can be a vicious sort, but we already knew that.

My concern is about the students he addressed, and how they will relate to Obama.  It has been my personal experience that hearing someone talk about how they cleaned up their act while I was still doing mine, sounded great. It gave me the false confidence that someday, I too, could clean up mine.  The fact is there may not be another chance.  All it would take is one more time "out there" and death will come before freedom.  I was among the lucky ones, and with the Grace of God can talk about it today.

The insidious nature of drugs is simply this, some folks never clean up, young people die everyday thinking that someday, soon, they will turn their lives around.  I've personally seen it happen on several occasions.  I sincerely hope Obama's message to the young people was positive, that those who are involved with drugs and alcohol understand it is a one-way street, and decide now to walk away and get serious about their lives.

Source [3]

[1] http://planetsave.com/files/2007/11/obamadrink1.jpg
[2] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dreams_from_My_Father
[3] http://planetsave.comwww.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D8T1IPAG0]]></content:encoded>
    <wfw:commentRss>http://planetsave.com/blog/2007/11/21/will-honesty-win-the-presidency/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>SAFE, Inexpensive Hydrogen Fuel For Your Car?</title>
    <link>http://planetsave.com/blog/2007/11/10/safe-inexpensive-hydrogen-fuel-for-your-car/</link>
    <comments>http://planetsave.com/blog/2007/11/10/safe-inexpensive-hydrogen-fuel-for-your-car/#comments</comments>
    <pubDate>Sat, 10 Nov 2007 20:02:34 +0000</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Max Lindberg</dc:creator>
    
    <guid isPermaLink="false">http://ps.greenoptions.com/blog/2007/11/10/safe-inexpensive-hydrogen-fuel-for-your-car/</guid>
    <description><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://planetsave.com/files/2007/11/jameshuntfiretruck1.jpg" title="Galesburg Register-Mail"><img src="http://planetsave.com/files/2007/11/jameshuntfiretruck1.jpg" alt="Galesburg Register-Mail" align="right" /></a>Back in May I wrote an article for Green Options called &#8220;<a href="http://maxlindberg.greenoptions.com/2007/05/21/the-perfect-hydrogen-vacation/">The Perfect Hydrogen Vacation</a>,&#8221; and it was centered around a young Galesburg, IL college student by the name of James Hunt.  His claim to fame is development of a hydrogen fuel generation system that would power internal combustion engines with hydrogen.  To say the least, I got a few negative comments about Jim&#8217;s invention, mainly that it was nothing more than an attempt at a perpetual motion machine.</p>
<p>The Galesburg Register-Mail newspaper, which broke the story first last April, has two more updates, &#8220;<a href="http://www.registermail.com/stories/111007/MAI_BESD12VP.GID.shtml">From Concept to Company</a>&#8221; and &#8220;<a href="http://www.registermail.com/stories/111007/MAI_BESDHSM3.GID.shtml">Energy Source Answers some Old Problems</a>,&#8221; written by John Pulliam.  I&#8217;m particularly fascinated with this story because Galesburg is my home town.</p>
<p>Well, Jim, shown in the Register-Mail photo at the left with a fire engine he hopes to convert into a hydrogen fueled mobile power unit, has moved out of the lab at Carl Sandburg College in Galesburg to his own plant in nearby Monmouth, IL with 15 employees.  All that, he says, in a period of 9 months from concept to reality.</p>
<p>The company&#8217;s name, by the way is Akvo Energy America, and the shop is full of engines undergoing conversion to his hydrogen fuel system.  Part of his plan is to fuel power plants and desalinization facilities with hydrogen.  He plans to use the fire engine as an emergency portable desalinization unit, something sorely needed in New Orleans after hurricane Katrina ravaged that city.</p>
<p>His process extracts hydrogen from water via what he calls plasmatic induction, a form of electrolysis, using electricty to zap water in a small reservoir tank which releases hydrogen bubbles.  The bubbles, of course, become the fuel, a never-ending source as long as drinking water is in the small reserve tank.  It&#8217;s a bit more complicated than that, he uses reserve batteries and solar cells along with non-radioactive carbon rods in the system.  Hunt claims one fill-up of rods will power a vehicle for a year-and-a-half; the emissions, of course, are water vapor.</p>
<p>Hunt claims to have a lobbyist in Washington, D.C. and what he called &#8220;a couple of pending contracts.&#8221;  Two major universities are testing the process and he said GM was ready to license his system right now.</p>
<p>Besides the fire truck, a 1995 Civic, a 1976 Corvette Stingray, a Hummer and a pickup truck are waiting for conversion to the system.  But before they can go on the highway for testing, they must be verified by the Environmental Protection Agency.  This process is underway.</p>
<p>Jim hopes to eventually move his plant back to Galesburg and occupy the now empty Maytag manufacturing plant.  Looking ahead, he hopes to have more than 1,000 employees for production and distribution.  When would this happen? Maybe in 18 months, maybe more.</p>
<p>I interviewed Jim on my own website in April, the <a href="http://thelindbergreport.org/2007/04/19/safe-inexpensive-hydrogen-fuel-for-your-car.aspx">Lindberg Report.org</a>, while he was still a student at Carl Sandburg College.  Since Planetsave and Green Options are going through changes that right now don&#8217;t support audio, you might want to listen to Jim talk about his invention.  As soon as we get audio on this site, I&#8217;ll have an updtated interview with Jim.</p>
<p>We&#8217;ll keep track of this young man and his invention that may just turn the hydrogen fuel world upside down, especially when billions of dollars are being spent trying to bring hydrogen powered vehicles out of showrooms, when Jim&#8217;s research cost $22,000.</p>
<p><!--more--></p>
]]></description>
    <content:encoded><![CDATA[ [1]Back in May I wrote an article for Green Options called "The Perfect Hydrogen Vacation [2]," and it was centered around a young Galesburg, IL college student by the name of James Hunt.  His claim to fame is development of a hydrogen fuel generation system that would power internal combustion engines with hydrogen.  To say the least, I got a few negative comments about Jim's invention, mainly that it was nothing more than an attempt at a perpetual motion machine.

The Galesburg Register-Mail newspaper, which broke the story first last April, has two more updates, "From Concept to Company [3]" and "Energy Source Answers some Old Problems [4]," written by John Pulliam.  I'm particularly fascinated with this story because Galesburg is my home town.

Well, Jim, shown in the Register-Mail photo at the left with a fire engine he hopes to convert into a hydrogen fueled mobile power unit, has moved out of the lab at Carl Sandburg College in Galesburg to his own plant in nearby Monmouth, IL with 15 employees.  All that, he says, in a period of 9 months from concept to reality.

The company's name, by the way is Akvo Energy America, and the shop is full of engines undergoing conversion to his hydrogen fuel system.  Part of his plan is to fuel power plants and desalinization facilities with hydrogen.  He plans to use the fire engine as an emergency portable desalinization unit, something sorely needed in New Orleans after hurricane Katrina ravaged that city.

His process extracts hydrogen from water via what he calls plasmatic induction, a form of electrolysis, using electricty to zap water in a small reservoir tank which releases hydrogen bubbles.  The bubbles, of course, become the fuel, a never-ending source as long as drinking water is in the small reserve tank.  It's a bit more complicated than that, he uses reserve batteries and solar cells along with non-radioactive carbon rods in the system.  Hunt claims one fill-up of rods will power a vehicle for a year-and-a-half; the emissions, of course, are water vapor.

Hunt claims to have a lobbyist in Washington, D.C. and what he called "a couple of pending contracts."  Two major universities are testing the process and he said GM was ready to license his system right now.

Besides the fire truck, a 1995 Civic, a 1976 Corvette Stingray, a Hummer and a pickup truck are waiting for conversion to the system.  But before they can go on the highway for testing, they must be verified by the Environmental Protection Agency.  This process is underway.

Jim hopes to eventually move his plant back to Galesburg and occupy the now empty Maytag manufacturing plant.  Looking ahead, he hopes to have more than 1,000 employees for production and distribution.  When would this happen? Maybe in 18 months, maybe more.

I interviewed Jim on my own website in April, the Lindberg Report.org [5], while he was still a student at Carl Sandburg College.  Since Planetsave and Green Options are going through changes that right now don't support audio, you might want to listen to Jim talk about his invention.  As soon as we get audio on this site, I'll have an updtated interview with Jim.

We'll keep track of this young man and his invention that may just turn the hydrogen fuel world upside down, especially when billions of dollars are being spent trying to bring hydrogen powered vehicles out of showrooms, when Jim's research cost $22,000.



[1] http://planetsave.com/files/2007/11/jameshuntfiretruck1.jpg
[2] http://maxlindberg.greenoptions.com/2007/05/21/the-perfect-hydrogen-vacation/
[3] http://www.registermail.com/stories/111007/MAI_BESD12VP.GID.shtml
[4] http://www.registermail.com/stories/111007/MAI_BESDHSM3.GID.shtml
[5] http://thelindbergreport.org/2007/04/19/safe-inexpensive-hydrogen-fuel-for-your-car.aspx]]></content:encoded>
    <wfw:commentRss>http://planetsave.com/blog/2007/11/10/safe-inexpensive-hydrogen-fuel-for-your-car/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>Is Yellowstone Ready to Blow?</title>
    <link>http://planetsave.com/blog/2007/11/09/is-yellowstone-ready-to-blow/</link>
    <comments>http://planetsave.com/blog/2007/11/09/is-yellowstone-ready-to-blow/#comments</comments>
    <pubDate>Fri, 09 Nov 2007 19:48:31 +0000</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Max Lindberg</dc:creator>
    
    <guid isPermaLink="false">http://ps.greenoptions.com/blog/2007/11/09/is-yellowstone-ready-to-blow/</guid>
    <description><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://planetsave.com/files/2007/11/old-faithful.jpg" title="Old Faithful"><img src="http://planetsave.com/files/2007/11/old-faithful.jpg" alt="Old Faithful" align="right" /></a>If you&#8217;ve ever been to Yellowstone National Park, you&#8217;ve undoubtedly waited for one of the most photographed and viewed natural phenomena to take place, Old Faithful erupting on it&#8217;s not-too-regular schedule.  But if scientists are to be believed, Old Faithfuls act would be a spit in the ocean compared to the eruption of Yellowstone&#8217;s caldera.</p>
<p>Will the Yellowstone volcano erupt anytime soon?  Probably not, but a report in <a href="www.livescience.com/environment/071108-yellowstone-volcano.html">Live Science </a> boggled my mind with the immensity of hot magma boiling beneath the seemingly pastoral serenity of Yellowstone.</p>
<p>According to the article, Yellowstone&#8217;s volcanic floor has risen 9 inches in the past three years, which doesn&#8217;t seem like much until you understand what&#8217;s pushing it upward.  There&#8217;s an enormous plume of molten rock that begins some 400 miles beneath the surface of Yellowstone, and rises to within 30 miles of the floor.  The magma chamber widens out at that point, encompassing some 300 miles across.  The article likens Yellowstone&#8217;s hidden blob of molten rock as being the size of Los Angeles, and has now risen to a point about 6 miles beneath the surface.</p>
<p>Does this mean an eruption is imminent, not necessarily so, according to scientists who constantly study the 40 x 25 mile bowl-like depression.</p>
<p>A seismologist at the University of Utah, Robert Smith, has been studying Yellowstone for years, and concludes in the article; &#8220;There is no evidence of an imminent volcanic eruption or hydrothermal explosion.  That&#8217;s the bottom line.&#8221;  He went on to say there were a lot of calderas worldwide that rise and fall over decades without erupting.</p>
<p>All that taken into consideration, the recent uplift has occurred &#8220;faster than a previous record of .8 inches per year from 1976 to 1985&#8243;.</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t know if you&#8217;ve seen the recent spate of television specials predicting what would happen if Yellowstone erupted full-force, a scary scenario, especially the predicted effect on the world&#8217;s climate!  But, what the heck, enjoy Yellowstone, it&#8217;s a beautiful, magical place, and if it blows while you&#8217;re there, you&#8217;ll become a part of history.  Think about it.</p>
<p><!--more--></p>
]]></description>
    <content:encoded><![CDATA[ [1]If you've ever been to Yellowstone National Park, you've undoubtedly waited for one of the most photographed and viewed natural phenomena to take place, Old Faithful erupting on it's not-too-regular schedule.  But if scientists are to be believed, Old Faithfuls act would be a spit in the ocean compared to the eruption of Yellowstone's caldera.

Will the Yellowstone volcano erupt anytime soon?  Probably not, but a report in Live Science  [2] boggled my mind with the immensity of hot magma boiling beneath the seemingly pastoral serenity of Yellowstone.

According to the article, Yellowstone's volcanic floor has risen 9 inches in the past three years, which doesn't seem like much until you understand what's pushing it upward.  There's an enormous plume of molten rock that begins some 400 miles beneath the surface of Yellowstone, and rises to within 30 miles of the floor.  The magma chamber widens out at that point, encompassing some 300 miles across.  The article likens Yellowstone's hidden blob of molten rock as being the size of Los Angeles, and has now risen to a point about 6 miles beneath the surface.

Does this mean an eruption is imminent, not necessarily so, according to scientists who constantly study the 40 x 25 mile bowl-like depression.

A seismologist at the University of Utah, Robert Smith, has been studying Yellowstone for years, and concludes in the article; "There is no evidence of an imminent volcanic eruption or hydrothermal explosion.  That's the bottom line."  He went on to say there were a lot of calderas worldwide that rise and fall over decades without erupting.

All that taken into consideration, the recent uplift has occurred "faster than a previous record of .8 inches per year from 1976 to 1985".

I don't know if you've seen the recent spate of television specials predicting what would happen if Yellowstone erupted full-force, a scary scenario, especially the predicted effect on the world's climate!  But, what the heck, enjoy Yellowstone, it's a beautiful, magical place, and if it blows while you're there, you'll become a part of history.  Think about it.



[1] http://planetsave.com/files/2007/11/old-faithful.jpg
[2] http://planetsave.comwww.livescience.com/environment/071108-yellowstone-volcano.html]]></content:encoded>
    <wfw:commentRss>http://planetsave.com/blog/2007/11/09/is-yellowstone-ready-to-blow/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>Art Goes Solar on Canadian Wind Tower</title>
    <link>http://planetsave.com/blog/2007/11/08/art-goes-solar-on-canadian-wind-tower/</link>
    <comments>http://planetsave.com/blog/2007/11/08/art-goes-solar-on-canadian-wind-tower/#comments</comments>
    <pubDate>Thu, 08 Nov 2007 12:47:45 +0000</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Max Lindberg</dc:creator>
    
    <guid isPermaLink="false">http://ps.greenoptions.com/blog/2007/11/08/art-goes-solar-on-canadian-wind-tower/</guid>
    <description><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://planetsave.com/files/2007/11/windtower2.jpg" alt="Regent College Wind Tower" height="195" width="233" />Imagine a wind tower with stained glass illuminated by solar energy.  It&#8217;s happening at <a href="http://www.anglicanjournal.com/100/article/art-installation-provides-a-window-on-energy-conservation-1/">Regent College</a>, a graduate school of Christian studies affiliated with the University of British Columbia in Vancouver.</p>
<p>The stained glass was designed by Sarah Hall, and is titled &#8220;Lux Nova&#8221;.  The column contains an array of solar cells that collect energy during the day, and creates what the article calls, &#8220;a luminous column of light flowing like a waterfall in silvery blue, violet and white.&#8221;  The ever changing rainbow of color is created by 12 dichroic glass crosses, and woven through the waterfall of light, is the Lord&#8217;s Prayer in Aramaic.</p>
<p>The artist was inducted into the Royal Canadian Academy of Art in 2002, and attended the architectural glass program at Swansea College of Art in Wales.  If you&#8217;d like to see more of Ms. Hall&#8217;s design, this is the link to her <a href="http://www.sarahhallstudio.com/">website</a>.</p>
<p>The 12-meter wind tower is used as a natural ventilation system for the new, $10 million underground theology library building.  The tower was designed by architect Clive Grout in collaboration with Walter Frankl Architects.</p>
]]></description>
    <content:encoded><![CDATA[Imagine a wind tower with stained glass illuminated by solar energy.  It's happening at Regent College [1], a graduate school of Christian studies affiliated with the University of British Columbia in Vancouver.

The stained glass was designed by Sarah Hall, and is titled "Lux Nova".  The column contains an array of solar cells that collect energy during the day, and creates what the article calls, "a luminous column of light flowing like a waterfall in silvery blue, violet and white."  The ever changing rainbow of color is created by 12 dichroic glass crosses, and woven through the waterfall of light, is the Lord's Prayer in Aramaic.

The artist was inducted into the Royal Canadian Academy of Art in 2002, and attended the architectural glass program at Swansea College of Art in Wales.  If you'd like to see more of Ms. Hall's design, this is the link to her website [2].

The 12-meter wind tower is used as a natural ventilation system for the new, $10 million underground theology library building.  The tower was designed by architect Clive Grout in collaboration with Walter Frankl Architects.

[1] http://www.anglicanjournal.com/100/article/art-installation-provides-a-window-on-energy-conservation-1/
[2] http://www.sarahhallstudio.com/]]></content:encoded>
    <wfw:commentRss>http://planetsave.com/blog/2007/11/08/art-goes-solar-on-canadian-wind-tower/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>Grass is Greener on Both Sides</title>
    <link>http://planetsave.com/blog/2007/11/02/grass-is-greener-on-both-sides/</link>
    <comments>http://planetsave.com/blog/2007/11/02/grass-is-greener-on-both-sides/#comments</comments>
    <pubDate>Fri, 02 Nov 2007 14:53:18 +0000</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Noelle dEstries</dc:creator>
    
		<category><![CDATA[Planetsave]]></category>

    <guid isPermaLink="false">http://ps.greenoptions.com/blog/2007/11/02/grass-is-greener-on-both-sides/</guid>
    <description><![CDATA[<p align="left">&nbsp;</p>
<p align="left">&nbsp;</p>
<p align="center">&nbsp;</p>
<p align="left">&nbsp;</p>
<p><a href="http://planetsave.com/files/2007/11/matilda2.jpg" title="matilda2.jpg"><img src="http://planetsave.com/files/2007/11/matilda2.jpg" alt="matilda2.jpg" align="right" height="165" width="215" /></a>Dr William Gray, a pioneer in meteorology bitched slapped Al Gore and all of us for that matter in a packed auditorium at the University of North Carolina. What would cause him to become so irate? The fact that humans are not responsible for global warming of course. It&#8217;s the salt levels in the ocean stupid! An Inconvenient Truth is ridiculous! We&#8217;re brainwashing our children! His ranting reminded me of Roald Dahl&#8217;s <strong>Matilda</strong>: &#8220;I&#8217;m Right, You&#8217;re Wrong. I&#8217;m Smart, You&#8217;re Dumb. I&#8217;m Big, You&#8217;re Little. And there&#8217;s nothing you can do about it!&#8221;</p>
<p>But then again, Dr.Gray had some interesting points, if not some very chilling facts about global warming and our impact. I actually feel bad for him. His remarks are the polar opposite of the scientific trend, making him an outcast or worse sounding like a madman. However, he may only sound crazy because it makes us mad to listen to someone put our cause to &#8220;save&#8221; the earth as being nothing but ridiculous. In the end, I think Dr.Gray would agree, that even if global warming has very little to do with our nasty ways, it&#8217;s obvious we need to make a change in the way we treat our Earth. From the <a href="http://www.smh.com.au/news/environment/gore-gets-a-cold-shoulder/2007/10/13/1191696238792.html">article</a>:</p>
<p>&#8220;Dr Gray, whose annual forecasts of the number of tropical storms and hurricanes are widely publicised, said a natural cycle of ocean water temperatures - related to the amount of salt in ocean water - was responsible for the global warming that he acknowledges has taken place.However, he said, that same cycle meant a period of cooling would begin soon and last for several years.</p>
<p>&#8220;We&#8217;ll look back on all of this in 10 or 15 years and realise how foolish it was,&#8221; Dr Gray said.<br />
<!--more--><br />
During his speech to a crowd of about 300 that included meteorology students and a host of professional meteorologists, Dr Gray also said those who had linked global warming to the increased number of hurricanes in recent years were in error.</p>
<p>He cited statistics showing there were 101 hurricanes from 1900 to 1949, in a period of cooler global temperatures, compared to 83 from 1957 to 2006 when the earth warmed.</p>
<p>&#8220;The human impact on the atmosphere is simply too small to have a major effect on global temperatures,&#8221; Dr Gray said.&#8221;<br />
<a href="http://www.smh.com.au/news/environment/gore-gets-a-cold-shoulder/2007/10/13/1191696238792.html">Read the rest of the article.</a></p>
]]></description>
    <content:encoded><![CDATA[&#160;
&#160;
&#160;
&#160;
 [1]Dr William Gray, a pioneer in meteorology bitched slapped Al Gore and all of us for that matter in a packed auditorium at the University of North Carolina. What would cause him to become so irate? The fact that humans are not responsible for global warming of course. It's the salt levels in the ocean stupid! An Inconvenient Truth is ridiculous! We're brainwashing our children! His ranting reminded me of Roald Dahl's Matilda: "I'm Right, You're Wrong. I'm Smart, You're Dumb. I'm Big, You're Little. And there's nothing you can do about it!"

But then again, Dr.Gray had some interesting points, if not some very chilling facts about global warming and our impact. I actually feel bad for him. His remarks are the polar opposite of the scientific trend, making him an outcast or worse sounding like a madman. However, he may only sound crazy because it makes us mad to listen to someone put our cause to "save" the earth as being nothing but ridiculous. In the end, I think Dr.Gray would agree, that even if global warming has very little to do with our nasty ways, it's obvious we need to make a change in the way we treat our Earth. From the article [2]:

"Dr Gray, whose annual forecasts of the number of tropical storms and hurricanes are widely publicised, said a natural cycle of ocean water temperatures - related to the amount of salt in ocean water - was responsible for the global warming that he acknowledges has taken place.However, he said, that same cycle meant a period of cooling would begin soon and last for several years.

"We'll look back on all of this in 10 or 15 years and realise how foolish it was," Dr Gray said.

During his speech to a crowd of about 300 that included meteorology students and a host of professional meteorologists, Dr Gray also said those who had linked global warming to the increased number of hurricanes in recent years were in error.

He cited statistics showing there were 101 hurricanes from 1900 to 1949, in a period of cooler global temperatures, compared to 83 from 1957 to 2006 when the earth warmed.

"The human impact on the atmosphere is simply too small to have a major effect on global temperatures," Dr Gray said."
Read the rest of the article. [3]

[1] http://planetsave.com/files/2007/11/matilda2.jpg
[2] http://www.smh.com.au/news/environment/gore-gets-a-cold-shoulder/2007/10/13/1191696238792.html
[3] http://www.smh.com.au/news/environment/gore-gets-a-cold-shoulder/2007/10/13/1191696238792.html]]></content:encoded>
    <wfw:commentRss>http://planetsave.com/blog/2007/11/02/grass-is-greener-on-both-sides/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>Dominant Species</title>
    <link>http://planetsave.com/blog/2007/10/30/dominant-species/</link>
    <comments>http://planetsave.com/blog/2007/10/30/dominant-species/#comments</comments>
    <pubDate>Tue, 30 Oct 2007 14:01:07 +0000</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Noelle dEstries</dc:creator>
    
		<category><![CDATA[Planetsave]]></category>

    <guid isPermaLink="false">http://ps.greenoptions.com/blog/2007/10/30/dominant-species/</guid>
    <description><![CDATA[<p><strong><font face="Arial" size="2">By: Anthony J. Gerst:</font></strong></p>
<p><a href="http://planetsave.com/files/2007/10/dinosaurs17.jpg" title="dinosaurs17.jpg"><img src="http://planetsave.com/files/2007/10/dinosaurs17.jpg" alt="dinosaurs17.jpg" align="left" height="325" width="223" /></a><font face="Arial" size="2">What do we know today, if anything? As my father is fond of saying, ‘I know  nothing, I can prove it, ask me anything.’ Recently it has been reported that at  CO2 atmospheric concentration levels of 500 ppm, the oceans will stop  calcification. It has been well documented that the planet’s southern ocean is  no longer acting as a carbon sink. And of course, one million acres of ice  disappeared from the Arctic and we discovered that Greenland melted at a rate of  25 percent over estimations during this past season. </font></p>
<p><font face="Arial" size="2">For the Cro-Magnon in our mist, be they from the trailer parks or the  intelligent design pews of humanistic debauchery, to the ten-thousand dollar  suited board and CEO members who still can grunt out the response: &#8220;huh, I don’t care.&#8221; People fail to comprehend  the baseline conceptions of what this foretells. People lament my forecast of an  impending ecological disaster. They scream, I kid you not, ‘you can’t tell the  future.’ I don’t have to tell the future, all I have to do is deduce the  information presented yearly. ‘But, but the scientists say we have at least 100  years.’ </font></p>
<p><font face="Arial" size="2">In the first place, taking that attitude without committing to changing  anything is dooming future generations. The deduction here is simply enough, you  are not humane, you are narcissist, more animal than man, striving only to serve  self. Do you know what humanity calls a completely self-indulged individual? One  who justifies every action they do, a <strong>psychopath</strong>. Have you as an  individual questioned your humane meter lately? If you still possess the ability  to glance within the looking glass, you may be very surprised at what you  find.<!-- D(["mb","\u003c/p\&amp;gt;\n\u003cp\&amp;gt;Enough of the free psychoanalysis, what does the above information tell a \nmind that is capable of independent thought? By now most people in the civilized \nworld should know that the Arctic ice cap reflects the sunlight from the earth, \nhelping to stabilize our optimum temperature. Several of these individuals know \nthat the ice melting from Greenland affects the oceans circulatory system. This \nin effect, when slowed or stopped adds to the problem of the oceans acting as a \ncarbon sink, under the currently defined harmonic balance for our species. \u003c/p\&amp;gt;\n\u003cp\&amp;gt;Ever year scientists make predications, at first things dropped by ten fold, \nthan by fifty, than by 25 percent. One thing that is obvious is that the time to \nsevere ramifications is knocking at the planets door. A brief example without \ncyclically reducing the time to impact of great climatic upheavals, you know \nthat little thing called Rapid Climate Change, that so many fail to acknowledge. \nLet us say that the annual growth rate of CO2 is 2 parts per million instead of \nthe current 1.93. We are now at 381 ppm in the atmosphere. This means we have \n119 parts per million to go before the now forecasted point of doom. Let’s see \nthat would mean at current growth rates we are looking at 60 years tops, to get \neverything under control.\u003c/p\&amp;gt;\n\u003cp\&amp;gt;Now it shouldn’t take a free thinking mind long to figure this out. CO2 \nlevels continue to rise, repercussions like the melt in the Arctic, Greenland, \nCarbon Sinks going offline, deforestation, wild fires, droughts, water \nshortages, etc. are compiling and complicating the issue at hand. Here is \nsomething else that I keep an eye on that many may not. The tectonic plates and \nthe ring of fire have seen increasing activity. Many believe this is adding to \nthe increased temperatures of the oceans that are melting the icecap. \u003c/p\&amp;gt;\n\u003cp\&amp;gt;Ten years to bring things under control, I would say this is a rather \noptimistic hope. Depressing, yes it is. There is however that little element I \nalways leave left unsaid. There are millions if not billions of us that \nunderstand what is going on. We are the humane in humanity. Sadly, we are in the \nearly stages of a new world. With any luck we as species will not destroy this \nplanet. It would be very interesting, would it not, to be around in 100-150 \nyears to see the state of mankind? One thing that every one capable of \nindependent thought should agree upon, there will be a lot less of our species \naround. The big question is will we advance or fall back technologically? I \nsuppose when all is said and done. This will depend upon how many make it \nthrough, and how soon we attempt to mitigate, globally, what is happening. Of \ncourse in our conceit we may attempt to control the planet itself, therefore \nexpediting our own destruction. Remember students of history that great \ncivilizations fall, and barbarity returns to our species. We are overdue for a \ntumble, the question still remains will the planet erase us, and instill another \ndominate species?",1] );  //--></font></p>
<p><font face="Arial" size="2">Enough of the free psychoanalysis, what does the above information tell a  mind that is capable of independent thought? By now most people in the civilized  world should know that the Arctic ice cap reflects the sunlight from the earth,  helping to stabilize our optimum temperature. Further we know  that the ice melting from Greenland affects the oceans circulatory system. This  in effect, when slowed or stopped adds to the problem of the oceans acting as a  carbon sink, under the currently defined harmonic balance for our species. </font></p>
<p><font face="Arial" size="2">Ever year scientists make predications, at first things dropped by ten fold,  than by fifty, than by 25 percent. One thing that is obvious is that the time to  severe ramifications is knocking at the planet&#8217;s door. You know  that little thing called Rapid Climate Change, that so many fail to acknowledge.  Let us say that the annual growth rate of CO2 is 2 parts per million instead of  the current 1.93. We are now at 381 ppm in the atmosphere. This means we have  119 parts per million to go before the now forecasted point of doom. At current growth rates we are looking at 60 years tops, to get  everything under control.</font></p>
<p><!--more--> <font face="Arial" size="2">Now it shouldn’t take a free thinking mind long to figure this out. CO2  levels continue to rise, repercussions like the melt in the Arctic, Greenland,  Carbon Sinks going offline, deforestation, wild fires, droughts, water  shortages, etc. are compiling and complicating the issue at hand. Here is  something else that I keep an eye on that many may not. The tectonic plates and  the ring of fire have seen increasing activity. Many believe this is adding to  the increased temperatures of the oceans that are melting the icecap. </font></p>
<p><font face="Arial" size="2">Ten years to bring things under control is a rather  optimistic hope. Depressing, yes it is. There is however that little element I  always leave left unsaid. There are millions if not billions of us that  understand what is going on. We are the humane in humanity. Sadly, we are in the  early stages of a new world. With any luck, we as a species, will not destroy this  planet. It would be very interesting, would it not, to be around in 100-150  years to see the state of mankind? There will be a lot less of our species  around. The big question is will we advance or fall back technologically? This will depend upon how many make it  through, and how soon we attempt to mitigate, globally, what is happening. </font></p>
<p><font face="Arial" size="2">Of  course in our conceit we may attempt to control the planet itself, therefore  expediting our own destruction. Remember students of history that great  civilizations fall, and barbarity returns to our species. We are overdue for a  tumble, the question still remains will the planet erase us, and instill another  dominate species?<!-- D(["mb","\u003c/p\&amp;gt;\n\u003cp\&amp;gt;Yes, great things are happening in the global warming battle. So many of you \nare forever optimistic that is a good thing, really. I applaud the actions taken \nby every single soul upon this globe that try and fight the good fight. After \nall, it will in my opinion be the enclaves of the humane that survive the best. \n\u003c/p\&amp;gt;\n\u003cp\&amp;gt;Personally I do not share your optimism, I believe that rapid climate change \nwill happen. I believe humanity is in for a severe reawakening to a more \nprimeval state. This does not mean that I have given up on our species. Remember \nit is the humane element within us that gave rise to our species advancement. As \nlong as the human race survives it is this element that will set us apart. In \nthe year 2157 will mankind be in groups of hunter-gather’s or cities living \nunder bubbles near the Arctic Circle. Perhaps we will be both, with masquerading \nbands of narcissist’s roaming the bad lands. Who can tell, not I, I cannot see \nthe future. On the other hand I can think, and to think humanity can continue \nalong our current path without grave repercussions is an illusion of an inferior \nmind. \u003c/p\&amp;gt;\n\u003cp\&amp;gt;A new study released by the National Academy of Sciences October 22-26 was \nthe basis for the (ppm) figures used in this writing. For a more scientific \napproach and to see the current figures and statistical information on this past \nseasons climate changes, look them up. With many organizations from around the \nglobe working on this study the nations represented are, Australia, East Anglia, \nAustria, France, UK and the USA. Of course it is just amazing what has happened \nbetween 2000-2006. \u003c/p\&amp;gt;\n\u003cp\&amp;gt;If only the humane would survived, what a planet it would \nbe.\u003c/p\&amp;gt;\u003c/font\&amp;gt;\u003c/div\&amp;gt;\u003c/div\&amp;gt;\n",0] );  //--></font></p>
<p><font face="Arial" size="2">Yes, great things are happening in the global warming battle. So many of you  are forever optimistic that is a good thing, really. I applaud the actions taken  by every single soul upon this globe that try and fight the good fight. After  all, it will in my opinion be the enclaves of the humane that survive the best.  </font></p>
<p><font face="Arial" size="2">Personally I do not share your optimism, I believe that rapid climate change  will happen. I believe humanity is in for a severe reawakening to a more  primeval state. This does not mean that I have given up on our species. Remember  it is the humane element within us that gave rise to our species advancement. As  long as the human race survives it is this element that will set us apart. In  the year 2157 will mankind be in groups of hunter-gatherers</font> <font face="Arial" size="2"> or cities living  under bubbles near the Arctic Circle. Perhaps we will be both, with masquerading  bands of narcissist’s roaming the bad lands. </font></p>
<p><font face="Arial" size="2">Who can tell, not I, I cannot see  the future. On the other hand I can think, and to think humanity can continue  along our current path without grave repercussions is an illusion of an inferior  mind. </font></p>
<p><font face="Arial" size="2">A new study released by the National Academy of Sciences October 22-26 was  the basis for the (ppm) figures used in this writing. For a more scientific  approach and to see the current figures and statistical information on this past  seasons climate changes, look them up. With many organizations from around the  globe working on this study the nations represented are, Australia, East Anglia,  Austria, France, UK and the USA. Of course it is just amazing what has happened  between 2000-2006. </font></p>
<p><font face="Arial" size="2">If only the humane would survived, what a planet it would  be.</font></p>
]]></description>
    <content:encoded><![CDATA[By: Anthony J. Gerst:

 [1]What do we know today, if anything? As my father is fond of saying, ‘I know  nothing, I can prove it, ask me anything.’ Recently it has been reported that at  CO2 atmospheric concentration levels of 500 ppm, the oceans will stop  calcification. It has been well documented that the planet’s southern ocean is  no longer acting as a carbon sink. And of course, one million acres of ice  disappeared from the Arctic and we discovered that Greenland melted at a rate of  25 percent over estimations during this past season. 

For the Cro-Magnon in our mist, be they from the trailer parks or the  intelligent design pews of humanistic debauchery, to the ten-thousand dollar  suited board and CEO members who still can grunt out the response: "huh, I don’t care." People fail to comprehend  the baseline conceptions of what this foretells. People lament my forecast of an  impending ecological disaster. They scream, I kid you not, ‘you can’t tell the  future.’ I don’t have to tell the future, all I have to do is deduce the  information presented yearly. ‘But, but the scientists say we have at least 100  years.’ 

In the first place, taking that attitude without committing to changing  anything is dooming future generations. The deduction here is simply enough, you  are not humane, you are narcissist, more animal than man, striving only to serve  self. Do you know what humanity calls a completely self-indulged individual? One  who justifies every action they do, a psychopath. Have you as an  individual questioned your humane meter lately? If you still possess the ability  to glance within the looking glass, you may be very surprised at what you  find.

Enough of the free psychoanalysis, what does the above information tell a  mind that is capable of independent thought? By now most people in the civilized  world should know that the Arctic ice cap reflects the sunlight from the earth,  helping to stabilize our optimum temperature. Further we know  that the ice melting from Greenland affects the oceans circulatory system. This  in effect, when slowed or stopped adds to the problem of the oceans acting as a  carbon sink, under the currently defined harmonic balance for our species. 

Ever year scientists make predications, at first things dropped by ten fold,  than by fifty, than by 25 percent. One thing that is obvious is that the time to  severe ramifications is knocking at the planet's door. You know  that little thing called Rapid Climate Change, that so many fail to acknowledge.  Let us say that the annual growth rate of CO2 is 2 parts per million instead of  the current 1.93. We are now at 381 ppm in the atmosphere. This means we have  119 parts per million to go before the now forecasted point of doom. At current growth rates we are looking at 60 years tops, to get  everything under control.

 Now it shouldn’t take a free thinking mind long to figure this out. CO2  levels continue to rise, repercussions like the melt in the Arctic, Greenland,  Carbon Sinks going offline, deforestation, wild fires, droughts, water  shortages, etc. are compiling and complicating the issue at hand. Here is  something else that I keep an eye on that many may not. The tectonic plates and  the ring of fire have seen increasing activity. Many believe this is adding to  the increased temperatures of the oceans that are melting the icecap. 

Ten years to bring things under control is a rather  optimistic hope. Depressing, yes it is. There is however that little element I  always leave left unsaid. There are millions if not billions of us that  understand what is going on. We are the humane in humanity. Sadly, we are in the  early stages of a new world. With any luck, we as a species, will not destroy this  planet. It would be very interesting, would it not, to be around in 100-150  years to see the state of mankind? There will be a lot less of our species  around. The big question is will we advance or fall back technologically? This will depend upon how many make it  through, and how soon we attempt to mitigate, globally, what is happening. 

Of  course in our conceit we may attempt to control the planet itself, therefore  expediting our own destruction. Remember students of history that great  civilizations fall, and barbarity returns to our species. We are overdue for a  tumble, the question still remains will the planet erase us, and instill another  dominate species?

Yes, great things are happening in the global warming battle. So many of you  are forever optimistic that is a good thing, really. I applaud the actions taken  by every single soul upon this globe that try and fight the good fight. After  all, it will in my opinion be the enclaves of the humane that survive the best.  

Personally I do not share your optimism, I believe that rapid climate change  will happen. I believe humanity is in for a severe reawakening to a more  primeval state. This does not mean that I have given up on our species. Remember  it is the humane element within us that gave rise to our species advancement. As  long as the human race survives it is this element that will set us apart. In  the year 2157 will mankind be in groups of hunter-gatherers  or cities living  under bubbles near the Arctic Circle. Perhaps we will be both, with masquerading  bands of narcissist’s roaming the bad lands. 

Who can tell, not I, I cannot see  the future. On the other hand I can think, and to think humanity can continue  along our current path without grave repercussions is an illusion of an inferior  mind. 

A new study released by the National Academy of Sciences October 22-26 was  the basis for the (ppm) figures used in this writing. For a more scientific  approach and to see the current figures and statistical information on this past  seasons climate changes, look them up. With many organizations from around the  globe working on this study the nations represented are, Australia, East Anglia,  Austria, France, UK and the USA. Of course it is just amazing what has happened  between 2000-2006. 

If only the humane would survived, what a planet it would  be.

[1] http://planetsave.com/files/2007/10/dinosaurs17.jpg]]></content:encoded>
    <wfw:commentRss>http://planetsave.com/blog/2007/10/30/dominant-species/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>Arnold Tells British Mag Marijuana is Not a Drug</title>
    <link>http://planetsave.com/blog/2007/10/29/arnold-tells-british-mag-marijuana-is-not-a-drug/</link>
    <comments>http://planetsave.com/blog/2007/10/29/arnold-tells-british-mag-marijuana-is-not-a-drug/#comments</comments>
    <pubDate>Mon, 29 Oct 2007 16:21:11 +0000</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Noelle dEstries</dc:creator>
    
    <guid isPermaLink="false">http://ps.greenoptions.com/blog/2007/10/29/arnold-tells-british-mag-marijuana-is-not-a-drug/</guid>
    <description><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://planetsave.com/files/2007/10/arnold.jpg" title="arnold.jpg"><img src="http://planetsave.com/files/2007/10/arnold.jpg" alt="arnold.jpg" align="right" height="175" width="258" /></a>BY: Max Lindberg</p>
<p>The California governor is at it again, this time telling a <a href="http://www.hollywood.com/news/Schwarzenegger_Marijuana_Isnt_a_Drug/4966679">British</a> magazine that he had never used drugs, this in the face of evidence he acknowledged using marijuana in the 1970’s, and we all remember the documentary of 1977, &#8220;Pumping Iron&#8221;, where he was shown smoking a joint.According to the article, Schwarzenegger told CQ marijuana, &#8220;That is not a drug, it’s a leaf.&#8221; He went on to say his drug was pumping iron. The governor’s press agent, Aaron McLear said the comments were made in a lighthearted context during an interview with Piers Morgan, one of the judges on &#8220;America’s Got Talent.&#8221;</p>
<p>And how interesting this so-called &#8220;lighthearted&#8221; comment in view of the fact the governor vetoed his state legislatures latest bill on <a href="http://greenoptions.com/2007/10/16/california_governor_nixes_industrial_hemp_while_north_dakota_moves_on">industrial hemp</a>.  Read the <a href="http://www.hollywood.com/news/Schwarzenegger_Marijuana_Isnt_a_Drug/4966679">Yahoo! News article</a>, it’s worth a laugh or two.</p>
]]></description>
    <content:encoded><![CDATA[ [1]BY: Max Lindberg

The California governor is at it again, this time telling a British [2] magazine that he had never used drugs, this in the face of evidence he acknowledged using marijuana in the 1970’s, and we all remember the documentary of 1977, "Pumping Iron", where he was shown smoking a joint.According to the article, Schwarzenegger told CQ marijuana, "That is not a drug, it’s a leaf." He went on to say his drug was pumping iron. The governor’s press agent, Aaron McLear said the comments were made in a lighthearted context during an interview with Piers Morgan, one of the judges on "America’s Got Talent."

And how interesting this so-called "lighthearted" comment in view of the fact the governor vetoed his state legislatures latest bill on industrial hemp [3].  Read the Yahoo! News article [4], it’s worth a laugh or two.

[1] http://planetsave.com/files/2007/10/arnold.jpg
[2] http://www.hollywood.com/news/Schwarzenegger_Marijuana_Isnt_a_Drug/4966679
[3] http://greenoptions.com/2007/10/16/california_governor_nixes_industrial_hemp_while_north_dakota_moves_on
[4] http://www.hollywood.com/news/Schwarzenegger_Marijuana_Isnt_a_Drug/4966679]]></content:encoded>
    <wfw:commentRss>http://planetsave.com/blog/2007/10/29/arnold-tells-british-mag-marijuana-is-not-a-drug/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>From Iowa to Gulf Restoration Network</title>
    <link>http://planetsave.com/blog/2007/10/19/from-iowa-to-gulf-restoration-network/</link>
    <comments>http://planetsave.com/blog/2007/10/19/from-iowa-to-gulf-restoration-network/#comments</comments>
    <pubDate>Fri, 19 Oct 2007 14:10:01 +0000</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Noelle dEstries</dc:creator>
    
    <guid isPermaLink="false">http://ps.greenoptions.com/blog/2007/10/19/from-iowa-to-gulf-restoration-network/</guid>
    <description><![CDATA[<p><font face="Arial" size="2"><strong>From Iowa to Gulf Restoration Network:</strong></font></p>
<p><font face="Arial" size="2"><strong>By: Anthony J. Gerst:</strong></font></p>
<p><a href="http://planetsave.com/files/2007/10/hemp.jpg" title="hemp.jpg"><img src="http://planetsave.com/files/2007/10/hemp.jpg" alt="hemp.jpg" align="right" /></a><font face="Arial" size="2">It is difficult for many urbanites to realize the significance of the Farm  Bill. Grant it the United States is now a net importer of foodstuffs, how and  why has this happened? The Farm Bill is crucial to this  nation. It affects the aspects of all Americans daily. From environmental issues  like fertilizing Iowa’s cornfields to the dead zone in the Gulf of Mexico, the  Farm Bill affects you.</font></p>
<p><font face="Arial" size="2">Hailing from Iowa, Senator Tom Harkin is the Chairman of the Agriculture,  Nutrition, and Forestry Committee in Washington D.C. The good senator fights a  noble battle for the people of this nation. I offer this quote from a recent  communication with his office. &#8220;The senate Agriculture Committee heard testimony  from Rhonda Stewart. . . her food stamp benefits run out toward the end of the  month. . . It is simply unacceptable for American families to go hungry. So my  farm bill will include overdue updates to the food stamp program.&#8221;</font></p>
<p><font face="Arial" size="2">In a recent release from the Gulf Restoration Network, they express concerns  over the upcoming Farm Bill legislation. They point out that the increased  production of corn is having dire effects upon the Gulf Coast. Rest assured that  these concerns are not unheeded by the Chairman of this distinguished committee.  Tom Harkin however most work within the framework of governmental compromise to  achieve anything. I quote, &#8220;But for this to happen, we need to make major  investments in research. We need to ramp up production of <strong><em>new energy  crop such as biomass&#8230; To do these things, we need new investments in the farm bill&#8217;s energy title.&#8221;</em></strong></font></p>
<p><!--more--></p>
<p><font face="Arial" size="2">I have expressed my concerns that Industrial Hemp is the number one crop for  this nation and the world to invest in on several occasions. How about lending a  poor old scribe a hand in getting <a href="http://harkin.senate.gov/about-tom.cfm.">this message</a> across?</font></p>
<p><font face="Arial" size="2">Before we move on to an issue of mutual concern within these communications,  let us look at one more initiative that the Farm Bill and Senator Harkin is  working upon that affects all of us as a nation. &#8220;My bill will make investments  for the future - investments in renewable energy production, environmental  incentives, our food assistance programs, fresh fruits and vegetables in  schools. . .&#8221; For pities sake people, our schools have virtually eliminated  physical education and hardly feed your children nutritional food. Listen to  this man at least he’s trying to offer proper nutrition to starving minds.</font></p>
<p><font face="Arial" size="2">According to the Gulf Restoration Network they are concerned with the lack of  funds available for the Conservation Reserve Program. Newsflash, millions of  acres in this program have been opened up to production without penalty. The  issue is not additional funds; the issue is the preservation of wetlands and  habitat that has restored flora and fauna to the nation. I hate this move, since  it has already been done, in retrospect to the fact here is another quote from  Harkin’s letter. &#8220;With millions of acres of fragile, erodible land being taken  out of the Conservation Reserve Program (CRP) and put into production, we have  an acute need to boost investments in conservation, especially conservation on  working lands. As Fred Wilson, a farmer in. . . told me. ‘Given the soil types  and structure in this area, if you don’t no-till, you’re in trouble down the  road.&#8221;’</font></p>
<p><font face="Arial" size="2">Two programs that may still be salvaged are the Environmental Quality  Incentives Program (EQIP) and the Wetland Reserve Program (WRP). I quote from  the Gulf Network update, &#8220;Strengthening the conservation compliance provisions.  Specifically, conservation compliance should apply to all cropland receiving  farm program benefits, not just erodible land.&#8221; I believe that is what Senator  Harkin and Fred Wilson are driving at, something that voices like Fred Wilson  are encouraging. I have watched as fields harvested this season have been  rapidly replanted in winter wheat, fields that have expanded in acreage I might  add.</font></p>
<p><font face="Arial" size="2">Another issues brought up by the Gulf Network is: &#8220;Funding for the Discovery  Watersheds Program in the Upper Mississippi River Basin, aimed at promoting  cost-effective approaches to reducing nitrogen and phosphorus runoff that  ultimately contributes to the Gulf of Mexico Dead Zone.&#8221;</font></p>
<p><font face="Arial" size="2">It sure nuff get lonely being an activist eco persona here in the Heartland.  As you are well aware the majority of eco-friendly warriors reside in the more  heavily populated centers of the east and western parts of our nation. Senator  Harkin, Fred Wilson, and myself are not alone in the Heartland in this battle.  However, we sure could use a couple of thousand e-mails from the coast to help  design the current Farm Bill. After all people, it does affect every single  person in this nation, and has global, one could say, climatic  ramifications.</font></p>
<p><font face="Arial" size="2"><a href="http://salsa.democracyinaction.org/dia/track.jsp?v=2&amp;c=voDmOv76Ood2jswOT9UhGP8rBNUMlT1g">Visit this website</a></font></p>
]]></description>
    <content:encoded><![CDATA[From Iowa to Gulf Restoration Network:
By: Anthony J. Gerst:

 [1]It is difficult for many urbanites to realize the significance of the Farm  Bill. Grant it the United States is now a net importer of foodstuffs, how and  why has this happened? The Farm Bill is crucial to this  nation. It affects the aspects of all Americans daily. From environmental issues  like fertilizing Iowa’s cornfields to the dead zone in the Gulf of Mexico, the  Farm Bill affects you.

Hailing from Iowa, Senator Tom Harkin is the Chairman of the Agriculture,  Nutrition, and Forestry Committee in Washington D.C. The good senator fights a  noble battle for the people of this nation. I offer this quote from a recent  communication with his office. "The senate Agriculture Committee heard testimony  from Rhonda Stewart. . . her food stamp benefits run out toward the end of the  month. . . It is simply unacceptable for American families to go hungry. So my  farm bill will include overdue updates to the food stamp program."

In a recent release from the Gulf Restoration Network, they express concerns  over the upcoming Farm Bill legislation. They point out that the increased  production of corn is having dire effects upon the Gulf Coast. Rest assured that  these concerns are not unheeded by the Chairman of this distinguished committee.  Tom Harkin however most work within the framework of governmental compromise to  achieve anything. I quote, "But for this to happen, we need to make major  investments in research. We need to ramp up production of new energy  crop such as biomass... To do these things, we need new investments in the farm bill's energy title."



I have expressed my concerns that Industrial Hemp is the number one crop for  this nation and the world to invest in on several occasions. How about lending a  poor old scribe a hand in getting this message [2] across?

Before we move on to an issue of mutual concern within these communications,  let us look at one more initiative that the Farm Bill and Senator Harkin is  working upon that affects all of us as a nation. "My bill will make investments  for the future - investments in renewable energy production, environmental  incentives, our food assistance programs, fresh fruits and vegetables in  schools. . ." For pities sake people, our schools have virtually eliminated  physical education and hardly feed your children nutritional food. Listen to  this man at least he’s trying to offer proper nutrition to starving minds.

According to the Gulf Restoration Network they are concerned with the lack of  funds available for the Conservation Reserve Program. Newsflash, millions of  acres in this program have been opened up to production without penalty. The  issue is not additional funds; the issue is the preservation of wetlands and  habitat that has restored flora and fauna to the nation. I hate this move, since  it has already been done, in retrospect to the fact here is another quote from  Harkin’s letter. "With millions of acres of fragile, erodible land being taken  out of the Conservation Reserve Program (CRP) and put into production, we have  an acute need to boost investments in conservation, especially conservation on  working lands. As Fred Wilson, a farmer in. . . told me. ‘Given the soil types  and structure in this area, if you don’t no-till, you’re in trouble down the  road."’

Two programs that may still be salvaged are the Environmental Quality  Incentives Program (EQIP) and the Wetland Reserve Program (WRP). I quote from  the Gulf Network update, "Strengthening the conservation compliance provisions.  Specifically, conservation compliance should apply to all cropland receiving  farm program benefits, not just erodible land." I believe that is what Senator  Harkin and Fred Wilson are driving at, something that voices like Fred Wilson  are encouraging. I have watched as fields harvested this season have been  rapidly replanted in winter wheat, fields that have expanded in acreage I might  add.

Another issues brought up by the Gulf Network is: "Funding for the Discovery  Watersheds Program in the Upper Mississippi River Basin, aimed at promoting  cost-effective approaches to reducing nitrogen and phosphorus runoff that  ultimately contributes to the Gulf of Mexico Dead Zone."

It sure nuff get lonely being an activist eco persona here in the Heartland.  As you are well aware the majority of eco-friendly warriors reside in the more  heavily populated centers of the east and western parts of our nation. Senator  Harkin, Fred Wilson, and myself are not alone in the Heartland in this battle.  However, we sure could use a couple of thousand e-mails from the coast to help  design the current Farm Bill. After all people, it does affect every single  person in this nation, and has global, one could say, climatic  ramifications.

Visit this website [3]

[1] http://planetsave.com/files/2007/10/hemp.jpg
[2] http://harkin.senate.gov/about-tom.cfm.
[3] http://salsa.democracyinaction.org/dia/track.jsp?v=2&#38;c=voDmOv76Ood2jswOT9UhGP8rBNUMlT1g]]></content:encoded>
    <wfw:commentRss>http://planetsave.com/blog/2007/10/19/from-iowa-to-gulf-restoration-network/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>DIY: French Fry Biodiesel</title>
    <link>http://planetsave.com/blog/2007/10/18/diy-french-fry-biodiesel/</link>
    <comments>http://planetsave.com/blog/2007/10/18/diy-french-fry-biodiesel/#comments</comments>
    <pubDate>Thu, 18 Oct 2007 14:04:43 +0000</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Noelle dEstries</dc:creator>
    
		<category><![CDATA[Planetsave]]></category>

    <guid isPermaLink="false">http://ps.greenoptions.com/blog/2007/10/18/diy-french-fry-biodiesel/</guid>
    <description><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://planetsave.com/files/2007/10/french.jpg" title="french.jpg"><img src="http://planetsave.com/files/2007/10/french.jpg" alt="french.jpg" align="right" height="243" width="239" /></a>Today at Planetsave, we&#8217;ll let the BBC teach you how to run your vehicle on chip (that&#8217;s french fry to us) oil. Restaurants, bars and fast food joints normally send their oil to the landfill, now you can convert it to fuel your wheels. <a href="http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/science/nature/7047128.stm">From the article:</a></p>
<blockquote><p><font size="2">Dan Purkis, a consultant engineer, puts home-brewed fuel into the tanks of his 4&#215;4, even though he is based in Aberdeen - the oil capital of the UK.</font></p></blockquote>
<blockquote><p> <font size="2">He admits that messing about with old chip fat is not for everyone but adds: &#8220;It&#8217;s interesting and fun and it reduces my impact on the environment? </font></p>
<p><font size="2">&#8220;When I looked at my lifestyle I realised that fuel was the greatest energy user in my life.&#8221; </font></p>
<p><font size="2">You can buy conversion kits from £700 but Mr Purkis has made his own.  </font></p>
<p><font size="2">He told the BBC&#8217;s You and Yours programme: &#8220;No special tools were required and nothing was beyond the ability of a typical DIY enthusiast. Most of the parts were bought second hand or salvaged from scrap yards. </font></p>
<p><font size="2">&#8220;I recycle used vegetable oil from a local hotel. They throw away between 50 and 100 litres a week which would otherwise go to landfill.&#8221; </font></p>
<p><font size="2">Once he gets it home, he puts the oil through a series of refinements: </font></p>
<ul><font size="2"></p>
<li>Allows sediment in the oil to settle to the bottom of the bottle</li>
<li>Pumps and filters the top 70% of the oil; it is pure enough to put straight into his car</li>
<li>Treats the remaining sludge and converts it into biodiesel by adding methanol and caustic soda</li>
<li>Heats the oil, causing it to react with the caustic soda</li>
<p></font></ul>
<p><font size="2">The waste product from this process is glycerin, which has to be washed out of the biodiesel with soap and half-water to half-fuel. He then composts the glycerin. </font> <font size="2">Mr Purkis says his car runs better on biodiesel: &#8220;It&#8217;s smoother - better lubricated.&#8221; </font></p>
<p><font size="2">Even though he is a qualified engineer, he insists that it is not a difficult process.</font></p></blockquote>
<p><!--more--></p>
]]></description>
    <content:encoded><![CDATA[ [1]Today at Planetsave, we'll let the BBC teach you how to run your vehicle on chip (that's french fry to us) oil. Restaurants, bars and fast food joints normally send their oil to the landfill, now you can convert it to fuel your wheels. From the article: [2]
Dan Purkis, a consultant engineer, puts home-brewed fuel into the tanks of his 4x4, even though he is based in Aberdeen - the oil capital of the UK.
 He admits that messing about with old chip fat is not for everyone but adds: "It's interesting and fun and it reduces my impact on the environment? 

"When I looked at my lifestyle I realised that fuel was the greatest energy user in my life." 

You can buy conversion kits from £700 but Mr Purkis has made his own.  

He told the BBC's You and Yours programme: "No special tools were required and nothing was beyond the ability of a typical DIY enthusiast. Most of the parts were bought second hand or salvaged from scrap yards. 

"I recycle used vegetable oil from a local hotel. They throw away between 50 and 100 litres a week which would otherwise go to landfill." 

Once he gets it home, he puts the oil through a series of refinements: 

	Allows sediment in the oil to settle to the bottom of the bottle
	Pumps and filters the top 70% of the oil; it is pure enough to put straight into his car
	Treats the remaining sludge and converts it into biodiesel by adding methanol and caustic soda
	Heats the oil, causing it to react with the caustic soda

The waste product from this process is glycerin, which has to be washed out of the biodiesel with soap and half-water to half-fuel. He then composts the glycerin.  Mr Purkis says his car runs better on biodiesel: "It's smoother - better lubricated." 

Even though he is a qualified engineer, he insists that it is not a difficult process.


[1] http://planetsave.com/files/2007/10/french.jpg
[2] http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/science/nature/7047128.stm]]></content:encoded>
    <wfw:commentRss>http://planetsave.com/blog/2007/10/18/diy-french-fry-biodiesel/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>Prohibition Never Left</title>
    <link>http://planetsave.com/blog/2007/10/17/prohibition-never-left/</link>
    <comments>http://planetsave.com/blog/2007/10/17/prohibition-never-left/#comments</comments>
    <pubDate>Wed, 17 Oct 2007 14:51:08 +0000</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Noelle dEstries</dc:creator>
    
    <guid isPermaLink="false">http://ps.greenoptions.com/blog/2007/10/17/prohibition-never-left/</guid>
    <description><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://planetsave.com/files/2007/10/baggage.jpg" title="baggage.jpg"><img src="http://planetsave.com/files/2007/10/baggage.jpg" alt="baggage.jpg" align="right" /></a>The Earth has many issues, mainly because her occupants have a lot of baggage. We spend lifetimes on how to save the Earth from global warming, famine and disease. How do we save ourselves? We are a moralistic society, not a rational one; we preach dogma, not ethics. So what? Well, maybe it’s just not working.</p>
<p>Richard Brunstrom, the Chief Constable of North Wales, advocates an end to UK drug policy based on &#8220;prohibition&#8221;. Yes, he means making heroin, crack, cocaine and marijuana all legal and regulated. Is it crazy, preposterous or just plain logical?</p>
<p><a href="http://news.independent.co.uk/uk/politics/article3061121.ece">From the article</a>:</p>
<blockquote><p>   In his radical analysis, which he will present to the North Wales Police    Authority today, Mr Brunstrom points out that illegal drugs are now cheaper    and more plentiful than ever before.</p>
<p>The number of users has soared while drug-related crime is rising with    narcotics now supporting a worldwide business empire second only in value to    oil. &#8220;If policy on drugs is in future to be pragmatic not moralistic,    driven by ethics not dogma, then the current prohibitionist stance will have    to be swept away as both unworkable and immoral, to be replaced with an    evidence-based unified system (specifically including tobacco and alcohol)    aimed at minimisation of harms to society,&#8221; he will say.</p>
<p>Mr Brunstrom indicates that there is a growing mood for change. He cites the    House of Commons Select Committee on Science and Technology, which    criticised the Government for failing to switch to an evidence-based policy    approach. The report also includes quotes from former home secretary John    Reid, admitting &#8220;prohibition&#8221; doesn&#8217;t work, and the Olympics    minister, Tessa Jowell, conceding &#8220;it drives the activity underground&#8221; . There is also supportive evidence from former Chief Inspector of Prisons    Lord Ramsbotham, a retired High Court judge, and Scotland&#8217;s Drug Tsar, Tom    Wood.</p>
<p>As well as hitting the country hard in economic terms – class A drug use in    England and Wales costs the country up to £17bn a year, 90 per cent of which    is due to crime – there are also a series of socially damaging knock-on    effects, he says.</p></blockquote>
<p><!--more--></p>
]]></description>
    <content:encoded><![CDATA[ [1]The Earth has many issues, mainly because her occupants have a lot of baggage. We spend lifetimes on how to save the Earth from global warming, famine and disease. How do we save ourselves? We are a moralistic society, not a rational one; we preach dogma, not ethics. So what? Well, maybe it’s just not working.
Richard Brunstrom, the Chief Constable of North Wales, advocates an end to UK drug policy based on "prohibition". Yes, he means making heroin, crack, cocaine and marijuana all legal and regulated. Is it crazy, preposterous or just plain logical?
From the article [2]:

   In his radical analysis, which he will present to the North Wales Police    Authority today, Mr Brunstrom points out that illegal drugs are now cheaper    and more plentiful than ever before.

The number of users has soared while drug-related crime is rising with    narcotics now supporting a worldwide business empire second only in value to    oil. "If policy on drugs is in future to be pragmatic not moralistic,    driven by ethics not dogma, then the current prohibitionist stance will have    to be swept away as both unworkable and immoral, to be replaced with an    evidence-based unified system (specifically including tobacco and alcohol)    aimed at minimisation of harms to society," he will say.

Mr Brunstrom indicates that there is a growing mood for change. He cites the    House of Commons Select Committee on Science and Technology, which    criticised the Government for failing to switch to an evidence-based policy    approach. The report also includes quotes from former home secretary John    Reid, admitting "prohibition" doesn't work, and the Olympics    minister, Tessa Jowell, conceding "it drives the activity underground" . There is also supportive evidence from former Chief Inspector of Prisons    Lord Ramsbotham, a retired High Court judge, and Scotland's Drug Tsar, Tom    Wood.

As well as hitting the country hard in economic terms – class A drug use in    England and Wales costs the country up to £17bn a year, 90 per cent of which    is due to crime – there are also a series of socially damaging knock-on    effects, he says.


[1] http://planetsave.com/files/2007/10/baggage.jpg
[2] http://news.independent.co.uk/uk/politics/article3061121.ece]]></content:encoded>
    <wfw:commentRss>http://planetsave.com/blog/2007/10/17/prohibition-never-left/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>Windbelt to the Rescue</title>
    <link>http://planetsave.com/blog/2007/10/16/windbelt-to-the-rescue/</link>
    <comments>http://planetsave.com/blog/2007/10/16/windbelt-to-the-rescue/#comments</comments>
    <pubDate>Tue, 16 Oct 2007 14:01:06 +0000</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Noelle dEstries</dc:creator>
    
    <guid isPermaLink="false">http://ps.greenoptions.com/blog/2007/10/16/windbelt-to-the-rescue/</guid>
    <description><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://planetsave.com/files/2007/10/windbelt-470-1107.jpg" title="windbelt-470-1107.jpg"><img src="http://planetsave.com/files/2007/10/windbelt-470-1107.jpg" alt="windbelt-470-1107.jpg" align="right" height="367" width="370" /></a>There&#8217;s a lot of innovation being done for the middle class, the rich, but what about the people who only make a few dollars a day? Shawn Frayne, a young inventor out of California, invented a cheap generator alternative that he hopes will power the third world. From the <a href="http://www.popularmechanics.com/technology/industry/4224763.html?series=37">Popular Mechanics article</a>:</p>
<blockquote><p>Working in Haiti, Shawn Frayne, a 28-year-old inventor based in Mountain View, Calif., saw the need for small-scale wind power to juice LED lamps and radios in the homes of the poor. Conventional wind turbines don’t scale down well—there’s too much friction in the gearbox and other components. “With rotary power, there’s nothing out there that generates under 50 watts,” Frayne says. So he took a new tack, studying the way vibrations caused by the wind led to the collapse in 1940 of Washington’s Tacoma Narrows Bridge (aka Galloping Gertie).</p>
<p>Frayne’s device, which he calls a Windbelt, is a taut membrane fitted with a pair of magnets that oscillate between metal coils. Prototypes have generated 40 milliwatts in 10-mph slivers of wind, making his device 10 to 30 times as efficient as the best microturbines. Frayne envisions the Windbelt costing a few dollars and replacing kerosene lamps in Haitian homes. “Kerosene is smoky and it’s a fire hazard,” says Peter Haas, founder of the Appropriate Infrastructure Development Group, which helps people in developing countries to get environmentally sound access to clean water, sanitation and <a href="http://www.popularmechanics.com/technology/industry/4224763.html?series=37#">energy</a>. “If Shawn’s innovation breaks, locals can fix it. If a solar panel breaks, the family is out a panel.”</p></blockquote>
<p><a href="http://link.brightcove.com/services/player/bcpidAAZ1ewL%2BlVuF6S6NTq31hfigNq%2BI5PQjf">Watch the video demo</a></p>
<p><!--more--></p>
]]></description>
    <content:encoded><![CDATA[ [1]There's a lot of innovation being done for the middle class, the rich, but what about the people who only make a few dollars a day? Shawn Frayne, a young inventor out of California, invented a cheap generator alternative that he hopes will power the third world. From the Popular Mechanics article [2]:
Working in Haiti, Shawn Frayne, a 28-year-old inventor based in Mountain View, Calif., saw the need for small-scale wind power to juice LED lamps and radios in the homes of the poor. Conventional wind turbines don’t scale down well—there’s too much friction in the gearbox and other components. “With rotary power, there’s nothing out there that generates under 50 watts,” Frayne says. So he took a new tack, studying the way vibrations caused by the wind led to the collapse in 1940 of Washington’s Tacoma Narrows Bridge (aka Galloping Gertie).

Frayne’s device, which he calls a Windbelt, is a taut membrane fitted with a pair of magnets that oscillate between metal coils. Prototypes have generated 40 milliwatts in 10-mph slivers of wind, making his device 10 to 30 times as efficient as the best microturbines. Frayne envisions the Windbelt costing a few dollars and replacing kerosene lamps in Haitian homes. “Kerosene is smoky and it’s a fire hazard,” says Peter Haas, founder of the Appropriate Infrastructure Development Group, which helps people in developing countries to get environmentally sound access to clean water, sanitation and energy [3]. “If Shawn’s innovation breaks, locals can fix it. If a solar panel breaks, the family is out a panel.”
Watch the video demo [4]



[1] http://planetsave.com/files/2007/10/windbelt-470-1107.jpg
[2] http://www.popularmechanics.com/technology/industry/4224763.html?series=37
[3] http://www.popularmechanics.com/technology/industry/4224763.html?series=37#
[4] http://link.brightcove.com/services/player/bcpidAAZ1ewL%2BlVuF6S6NTq31hfigNq%2BI5PQjf]]></content:encoded>
    <wfw:commentRss>http://planetsave.com/blog/2007/10/16/windbelt-to-the-rescue/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>Renegade White House:</title>
    <link>http://planetsave.com/blog/2007/10/15/renegade-white-house/</link>
    <comments>http://planetsave.com/blog/2007/10/15/renegade-white-house/#comments</comments>
    <pubDate>Mon, 15 Oct 2007 14:47:11 +0000</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Noelle dEstries</dc:creator>
    
		<category><![CDATA[Planetsave]]></category>

    <guid isPermaLink="false">http://ps.greenoptions.com/blog/2007/10/15/renegade-white-house/</guid>
    <description><![CDATA[<p><strong><font face="Arial" size="2">Renegade White House:</font></strong></p>
<p><strong><font face="Arial" size="2">By: Anthony J. Gerst.</font></strong></p>
<p><a href="http://planetsave.com/files/2007/10/cheney_puppetmaster.jpg" title="cheney_puppetmaster.jpg"><img src="http://planetsave.com/files/2007/10/cheney_puppetmaster.jpg" alt="cheney_puppetmaster.jpg" align="right" /></a><font face="Arial" size="2">The clock is running out on Bush-Cheney’s global reign of terror. One of  their primary objectives still eludes them, an attack on Iran. With all the  saber rattling and posturing, not to mention all the ink being run about what  may very well become this administration’s biggest bungle, nothing can be found  related to the Chinese impact. China and Iran have negotiated extensive trade  agreements and a pipeline deal for oil shipments. For that matter, the Chinese,  Russia, and Iran have been working on energy related deals that tie in directly  to the pipelines and oil reserves of Iran and Russia. </font></p>
<p><font face="Arial" size="2">Unless this administration  has discussed the proposed carpet bombing of Iran with China, such an attack  could result in grave repercussions to the US economy.As China can bring  incredible pressures upon the US, not to mention with the weakened dollar, this  is the best time for the international community to act together, to establish a  new corner stone for international finance.</font></p>
<p><font face="Arial" size="2">Bush-Cheney fail to think beyond the pocket books of the oil cartel, with  Israeli and Gordon Brown backing a US led strategic carpet-bombing. The White  House has been actively pursuing this goal for at least six months. Despite  pleas from the Republican leadership, it appears if Cheney can find a way, Iran  will be attacked. Cheney’s office this past summer pushed the Joint Chief’s of  Staff to redraw plans for an attack on Iran. The focus now is on a strategical  strike against the Revolutionary Guards. The administration believes they can  defend this, as a response to the invasive activities of Iran inside Iraq. They  can site President Clinton’s strategic attacks in the Sudan and Afghanistan to  quell the Democrats uproar.</font></p>
<p><font face="Arial" size="2"> From a former senior intelligence official,  according to Seymour M. Hersh’s article ‘Shifting Targets: The Administration’s  Plan for Iran:’ &#8220;There is a desperate effort by Cheney et al. to bring military  action to Iran as soon as possible. . . But Cheney doesn’t give a rat’s ass  about the Republican worries, and neither does the President.&#8221;</font></p>
<p><!--more--></p>
<p><font face="Arial" size="2">It is now known that at CIA headquarters the majority of the Iraq Desk, has  been reassigned to the Iran task force, in order to bring about this mission of  the renegade White House. Hans Blix former head of the International Atomic  Energy Agency (I.A.E.A.) had this to say in the aforementioned article. &#8220;My  impression is that the United States has been trying to push up the accusations  against Iran as a basis for a possible attack-as an excuse for jumping on them.&#8221;  Even our supporting allies are worried over this move. This past July British  troops in Afghanistan uncovered an SA-7 missile coming into Afghanistan from  Iran. They were reluctant to pass this information to the United States. A  retired CIA agent who worked closely with the British had this to say, &#8220;The  Brits don’t trust the Iranians, but they also don’t trust Bush and Cheney.&#8221;</font></p>
<p><font face="Arial" size="2">There is too much at stake to allow a foolish attack upon Iran. It was our  collective arrogance that created this fiasco in Iraq. Therefore, we are to  blame for the rise of Iran as a regional player. Until another administration  takes over Washington, we as Americans must realize that no action to unite Iraq  will be forthcoming, as this administration is only interested in the monopoly  interest of the oil cartel. An attack on Iran would launch a wave of terrorist  retaliations across the globe. Hezbollah, under the wings of Iranian influence  are ready to react with international terror strikes. The unknown response from  a untied front of China and Russia are issues that cannot be ignored. </font></p>
<p><font face="Arial" size="2">Cheney is  banking on a complacent world. In case you haven’t noticed the world is no  longer complacent to U.S. interests. With regret we are but one Executive Order  away from a disaster that will make the invasion of Iraq look like a success.  Sadly, as Commander and Chief, the Leader of the Free World, this lies in the  hands of one man. In the end it comes down to this, will George stand up and be  a man, or will the Puppet Master again pull the strings?</font></p>
]]></description>
    <content:encoded><![CDATA[Renegade White House:

By: Anthony J. Gerst.

 [1]The clock is running out on Bush-Cheney’s global reign of terror. One of  their primary objectives still eludes them, an attack on Iran. With all the  saber rattling and posturing, not to mention all the ink being run about what  may very well become this administration’s biggest bungle, nothing can be found  related to the Chinese impact. China and Iran have negotiated extensive trade  agreements and a pipeline deal for oil shipments. For that matter, the Chinese,  Russia, and Iran have been working on energy related deals that tie in directly  to the pipelines and oil reserves of Iran and Russia. 

Unless this administration  has discussed the proposed carpet bombing of Iran with China, such an attack  could result in grave repercussions to the US economy.As China can bring  incredible pressures upon the US, not to mention with the weakened dollar, this  is the best time for the international community to act together, to establish a  new corner stone for international finance.

Bush-Cheney fail to think beyond the pocket books of the oil cartel, with  Israeli and Gordon Brown backing a US led strategic carpet-bombing. The White  House has been actively pursuing this goal for at least six months. Despite  pleas from the Republican leadership, it appears if Cheney can find a way, Iran  will be attacked. Cheney’s office this past summer pushed the Joint Chief’s of  Staff to redraw plans for an attack on Iran. The focus now is on a strategical  strike against the Revolutionary Guards. The administration believes they can  defend this, as a response to the invasive activities of Iran inside Iraq. They  can site President Clinton’s strategic attacks in the Sudan and Afghanistan to  quell the Democrats uproar.

 From a former senior intelligence official,  according to Seymour M. Hersh’s article ‘Shifting Targets: The Administration’s  Plan for Iran:’ "There is a desperate effort by Cheney et al. to bring military  action to Iran as soon as possible. . . But Cheney doesn’t give a rat’s ass  about the Republican worries, and neither does the President."



It is now known that at CIA headquarters the majority of the Iraq Desk, has  been reassigned to the Iran task force, in order to bring about this mission of  the renegade White House. Hans Blix former head of the International Atomic  Energy Agency (I.A.E.A.) had this to say in the aforementioned article. "My  impression is that the United States has been trying to push up the accusations  against Iran as a basis for a possible attack-as an excuse for jumping on them."  Even our supporting allies are worried over this move. This past July British  troops in Afghanistan uncovered an SA-7 missile coming into Afghanistan from  Iran. They were reluctant to pass this information to the United States. A  retired CIA agent who worked closely with the British had this to say, "The  Brits don’t trust the Iranians, but they also don’t trust Bush and Cheney."

There is too much at stake to allow a foolish attack upon Iran. It was our  collective arrogance that created this fiasco in Iraq. Therefore, we are to  blame for the rise of Iran as a regional player. Until another administration  takes over Washington, we as Americans must realize that no action to unite Iraq  will be forthcoming, as this administration is only interested in the monopoly  interest of the oil cartel. An attack on Iran would launch a wave of terrorist  retaliations across the globe. Hezbollah, under the wings of Iranian influence  are ready to react with international terror strikes. The unknown response from  a untied front of China and Russia are issues that cannot be ignored. 

Cheney is  banking on a complacent world. In case you haven’t noticed the world is no  longer complacent to U.S. interests. With regret we are but one Executive Order  away from a disaster that will make the invasion of Iraq look like a success.  Sadly, as Commander and Chief, the Leader of the Free World, this lies in the  hands of one man. In the end it comes down to this, will George stand up and be  a man, or will the Puppet Master again pull the strings?

[1] http://planetsave.com/files/2007/10/cheney_puppetmaster.jpg]]></content:encoded>
    <wfw:commentRss>http://planetsave.com/blog/2007/10/15/renegade-white-house/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>Phone Home</title>
    <link>http://planetsave.com/blog/2007/10/11/phone-home/</link>
    <comments>http://planetsave.com/blog/2007/10/11/phone-home/#comments</comments>
    <pubDate>Thu, 11 Oct 2007 16:38:51 +0000</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Noelle dEstries</dc:creator>
    
    <guid isPermaLink="false">http://ps.greenoptions.com/blog/2007/10/11/phone-home/</guid>
    <description><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://planetsave.com/files/2007/10/et_l.jpg" title="et_l.jpg"><img src="http://planetsave.com/files/2007/10/et_l.jpg" alt="et_l.jpg" align="right" /></a>If you checked out the nasty <a href="http://www.planetsave.com/blog/2007/10/10/ignorance-is-bliss-for-sure/">world clock</a> yesterday, you may be feeling down. After all, the population is rising exponentially, the earth is sizzling, our ‘leaders’ far from intelligent and our waistlines adding inches. We need help! (cue Beatles <em>Help</em>)</p>
<p>Apparently, NASA thinks so too. Today, they unveiled their first step using radio telescopes to widen their search for intelligent life in the universe (because we can&#8217;t find it at home). Thank you, NASA.</p>
<p>From the <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2007/10/11/science/11seti.html?_r=1&amp;ref=science&amp;oref=slogin"><em>New York Times</em></a> article:</p>
<blockquote><p>Call it a small step for E.T., a leap for radio astronomy.</p>
<p>Astronomers in Hat Creek, Calif., are planning today to switch on the first elements of a giant new array of radio telescopes that they say will greatly extend the investigation of natural and unnatural phenomena in the universe.</p>
<p>When the Allen Telescope Array, as it is known, is complete, it will consist of 350 antennas, each 20 feet in diameter. Using the separate antennas as if they were one giant dish, radio astronomers will be able to map vast swaths of the sky cheaply and efficiently.</p>
<p>There are some 200 billion stars in the galaxy, and a significant fraction of them have planets. Estimates of the number of intelligent civilizations in the galaxy have ranged from one (or none, if you are particularly discouraged about human affairs) into the millions.</p></blockquote>
<p><!--more--></p>
]]></description>
    <content:encoded><![CDATA[ [1]If you checked out the nasty world clock [2] yesterday, you may be feeling down. After all, the population is rising exponentially, the earth is sizzling, our ‘leaders’ far from intelligent and our waistlines adding inches. We need help! (cue Beatles Help)

Apparently, NASA thinks so too. Today, they unveiled their first step using radio telescopes to widen their search for intelligent life in the universe (because we can't find it at home). Thank you, NASA.

From the New York Times [3] article:
Call it a small step for E.T., a leap for radio astronomy.

Astronomers in Hat Creek, Calif., are planning today to switch on the first elements of a giant new array of radio telescopes that they say will greatly extend the investigation of natural and unnatural phenomena in the universe.

When the Allen Telescope Array, as it is known, is complete, it will consist of 350 antennas, each 20 feet in diameter. Using the separate antennas as if they were one giant dish, radio astronomers will be able to map vast swaths of the sky cheaply and efficiently.

There are some 200 billion stars in the galaxy, and a significant fraction of them have planets. Estimates of the number of intelligent civilizations in the galaxy have ranged from one (or none, if you are particularly discouraged about human affairs) into the millions.


[1] http://planetsave.com/files/2007/10/et_l.jpg
[2] http://www.planetsave.com/blog/2007/10/10/ignorance-is-bliss-for-sure/
[3] http://www.nytimes.com/2007/10/11/science/11seti.html?_r=1&#38;ref=science&#38;oref=slogin]]></content:encoded>
    <wfw:commentRss>http://planetsave.com/blog/2007/10/11/phone-home/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>Ignorance is Bliss&#8230; For Sure</title>
    <link>http://planetsave.com/blog/2007/10/10/ignorance-is-bliss-for-sure/</link>
    <comments>http://planetsave.com/blog/2007/10/10/ignorance-is-bliss-for-sure/#comments</comments>
    <pubDate>Wed, 10 Oct 2007 13:45:30 +0000</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Noelle dEstries</dc:creator>
    
		<category><![CDATA[Planetsave]]></category>

    <guid isPermaLink="false">http://ps.greenoptions.com/blog/2007/10/10/ignorance-is-bliss-for-sure/</guid>
    <description><![CDATA[<p align="left"><a href="http://www.planetsave.com/files/2007/10/classic_time_bomb.jpg" title="classic_time_bomb.jpg"></a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.planetsave.com/files/2007/10/classic_time_bomb.jpg" title="classic_time_bomb.jpg"><img src="http://www.planetsave.com/files/2007/10/classic_time_bomb.jpg" alt="classic_time_bomb.jpg" height="599" width="599" /></a></p>
<p align="left">&nbsp;</p>
<p><strong>What&#8217;s time is it? If you&#8217;re not looking for simply the time, then maybe <a href="http://www.poodwaddle.com/worldclock.swf">this world clock</a> is your cup of tea.</strong></p>
]]></description>
    <content:encoded><![CDATA[
 [1]
&#160;
What's time is it? If you're not looking for simply the time, then maybe this world clock [2] is your cup of tea.

[1] http://www.planetsave.com/files/2007/10/classic_time_bomb.jpg
[2] http://www.poodwaddle.com/worldclock.swf]]></content:encoded>
    <wfw:commentRss>http://planetsave.com/blog/2007/10/10/ignorance-is-bliss-for-sure/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>Technological Imperative: Compliance!</title>
    <link>http://planetsave.com/blog/2007/10/09/technological-imperative-compliance/</link>
    <comments>http://planetsave.com/blog/2007/10/09/technological-imperative-compliance/#comments</comments>
    <pubDate>Tue, 09 Oct 2007 14:13:12 +0000</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Noelle dEstries</dc:creator>
    
		<category><![CDATA[Planetsave]]></category>

    <guid isPermaLink="false">http://ps.greenoptions.com/blog/2007/10/09/technological-imperative-compliance/</guid>
    <description><![CDATA[<p>
<a href="http://www.planetsave.com/files/2007/10/flightofnaviagtor.jpg" title="flightofnaviagtor.jpg"><img src="http://www.planetsave.com/files/2007/10/flightofnaviagtor.jpg" alt="flightofnaviagtor.jpg" align="right" height="201" width="351" /></a>How far would you go to stop Global Warming? Or does that question not make sense &#8212; for one would go to the ends of the earth to save…the earth. It’s for the future generations, right? <em>Our children’s children</em> we proclaim and thus we compost and recycle and wear organic hoodies. However, there is a point where technology may go too far, as it is bound to do. The future we seek to protect could be a horrible one at best. Enter artificial life to protect the environment, move to designer babies and <em>Gattaca</em> becomes a reality. The technological imperative: <em>if we can do it, we will.</em></p>
<p><a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/science/2007/oct/06/genetics.climatechange">From the article:</a></p>
<blockquote><p>Craig Venter, the controversial DNA researcher involved in the race to decipher the human genetic code, has built a synthetic chromosome out of laboratory chemicals and is poised to announce the creation of the first new artificial life form on Earth.</p>
<p>The announcement, which is expected within weeks and could come as early as Monday at the annual meeting of his scientific institute in San Diego, California, will herald a giant leap forward in the development of designer genomes. It is certain to provoke heated debate about the ethics of creating new species and <strong>could unlock the door to new energy sources and techniques to combat global warming.</strong></p>
<p>Mr Venter told the Guardian he thought this landmark would be &#8220;a very important philosophical step in the history of our species. We are going from reading our genetic code to the ability to write it. That gives us the hypothetical ability to do things never contemplated before&#8221;.</p></blockquote>
<p><!--more--></p>
<blockquote><p>The Guardian can reveal that a team of 20 top scientists assembled by Mr Venter, led by the Nobel laureate Hamilton Smith, has already constructed a synthetic chromosome, a feat of virtuoso bio-engineering never previously achieved. Using lab-made chemicals, they have painstakingly stitched together a chromosome that is 381 genes long and contains 580,000 base pairs of genetic code.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/science/2007/oct/06/genetics.climatechange">Source: The Guardian </a></p></blockquote>
]]></description>
    <content:encoded><![CDATA[
 [1]How far would you go to stop Global Warming? Or does that question not make sense -- for one would go to the ends of the earth to save…the earth. It’s for the future generations, right? Our children’s children we proclaim and thus we compost and recycle and wear organic hoodies. However, there is a point where technology may go too far, as it is bound to do. The future we seek to protect could be a horrible one at best. Enter artificial life to protect the environment, move to designer babies and Gattaca becomes a reality. The technological imperative: if we can do it, we will.

From the article: [2]
Craig Venter, the controversial DNA researcher involved in the race to decipher the human genetic code, has built a synthetic chromosome out of laboratory chemicals and is poised to announce the creation of the first new artificial life form on Earth.

The announcement, which is expected within weeks and could come as early as Monday at the annual meeting of his scientific institute in San Diego, California, will herald a giant leap forward in the development of designer genomes. It is certain to provoke heated debate about the ethics of creating new species and could unlock the door to new energy sources and techniques to combat global warming.

Mr Venter told the Guardian he thought this landmark would be "a very important philosophical step in the history of our species. We are going from reading our genetic code to the ability to write it. That gives us the hypothetical ability to do things never contemplated before".

The Guardian can reveal that a team of 20 top scientists assembled by Mr Venter, led by the Nobel laureate Hamilton Smith, has already constructed a synthetic chromosome, a feat of virtuoso bio-engineering never previously achieved. Using lab-made chemicals, they have painstakingly stitched together a chromosome that is 381 genes long and contains 580,000 base pairs of genetic code.

Source: The Guardian  [3]

[1] http://www.planetsave.com/files/2007/10/flightofnaviagtor.jpg
[2] http://www.guardian.co.uk/science/2007/oct/06/genetics.climatechange
[3] http://www.guardian.co.uk/science/2007/oct/06/genetics.climatechange]]></content:encoded>
    <wfw:commentRss>http://planetsave.com/blog/2007/10/09/technological-imperative-compliance/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
  </item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- 354 queries in 1.280 seconds. -->