<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
  xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
  xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
  >

<channel>
  <title>Green Options &#187; court</title>
  <link>http://greenoptions.com/tag/court</link>
  <description>Posts tagged 'court'</description>
  <pubDate>Mon, 09 Nov 2009 14:26:46 +0000</pubDate>
  <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
  <language>en</language>
  <item>
    <title>New Zealand Environment Court Says No to Huge Wind Farm</title>
    <link>http://cleantechnica.com/2009/11/09/new-zealand-environment-court-says-no-to-huge-wind-farm/</link>
    <comments>http://cleantechnica.com/2009/11/09/new-zealand-environment-court-says-no-to-huge-wind-farm/#comments</comments>
    <pubDate>Mon, 09 Nov 2009 14:26:46 +0000</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Zachary Shahan</dc:creator>
    
		<category><![CDATA[Climate Change]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[alternative energy]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[wind energy]]></category>

    <guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/2009/11/09/new-zealand-environment-court-says-no-to-huge-wind-farm/</guid>
    <description><![CDATA[<p><a href='http://cleantechnica.com/files/2009/11/newz.jpg'><img src="http://go635254.s3.amazonaws.com/cleantechnica/files/2009/11/newz.jpg" alt="" width="500" height="333" class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-3915" /></a><br />
<strong>What would have been the Southern Hemisphere&#8217;s largest wind farm, a $2 billion NZD ($1.4 billion USD) and 630 MW wind farm in New Zealand, is not happening because New Zealand&#8217;s Environment Court says that it would ruin the surrounding landscape.</strong></p>
<p>This project would have powered <strong>over a million homes</strong> and made a huge dent in New Zealand&#8217;s greenhouse gas emissions. It is not happening now because of a group of NIMBY activists and the Environment Court&#8217;s ruling.</p>
<p>This is a huge blow, in itself, to <strong>renewable and wind energy proponents</strong>, but it also brings concerns for future wind energy projects.</p>
<p><a href="http://cleantechnica.com/2009/11/09/new-zealand-environment-court-says-no-to-huge-wind-farm/" class="more-link">Read more of this story &#187;</a></p>
]]></description>
    <wfw:commentRss>http://cleantechnica.com/2009/11/09/new-zealand-environment-court-says-no-to-huge-wind-farm/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>Patent Infringement Could Halt Toyota Hybrid Imports</title>
    <link>http://gas2.org/2009/09/08/patent-infringement-could-halt-toyota-hybrid-imports/</link>
    <comments>http://gas2.org/2009/09/08/patent-infringement-could-halt-toyota-hybrid-imports/#comments</comments>
    <pubDate>Tue, 08 Sep 2009 17:19:32 +0000</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Christopher DeMorro</dc:creator>
    
		<category><![CDATA[Hybrid-electric EVs]]></category>

    <guid isPermaLink="false">http://gas2.org/2009/09/08/patent-infringement-could-halt-toyota-hybrid-imports/</guid>
    <description><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://gas2.org/files/2009/09/prius.jpg"><img class="aligncenter size-medium wp-image-3424" src="http://go635254.s3.amazonaws.com/gas2/files/2009/09/prius.jpg" alt="" width="520" height="307" /></a></p>
<p>Where is the mainstream media when you need them? Probably off chasing another Micheal Jackson&#8217;s baby&#8217;s daddy. But they could do a lot more use into investigating the court case of Paice LLC vs. Toyota. In the lawsuit filed by Paice against Toyota, Paice claims that several of Toyota&#8217;s popular hybrid models infringe on patents held by Paice. Having won a similar case back in 2005, Paice is now seeking an exclusion that would keep Toyota hybrid imports from entering the U.S.</p>
<p><a href="http://gas2.org/2009/09/08/patent-infringement-could-halt-toyota-hybrid-imports/" class="more-link">Read more of this story &#187;</a></p>
]]></description>
    <wfw:commentRss>http://gas2.org/2009/09/08/patent-infringement-could-halt-toyota-hybrid-imports/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>Breaths of Fresh Air: Bush-Era Pollution Waivers Rejected By Courts</title>
    <link>http://planetsave.com/blog/2009/07/15/breaths-of-fresh-air-bush-era-pollution-waivers-rejected-by-courts/</link>
    <comments>http://planetsave.com/blog/2009/07/15/breaths-of-fresh-air-bush-era-pollution-waivers-rejected-by-courts/#comments</comments>
    <pubDate>Wed, 15 Jul 2009 00:04:14 +0000</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Ruedigar Matthes</dc:creator>
    
		<category><![CDATA[Environmental Policies]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Health]]></category>

    <guid isPermaLink="false">http://planetsave.com/blog/2009/07/15/breaths-of-fresh-air-bush-era-pollution-waivers-rejected-by-courts/</guid>
    <description><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://planetsave.com/files/2009/07/power-plant.jpg"><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-4678" src="http://go635254.s3.amazonaws.com/planetsave/files/2009/07/power-plant.jpg" alt="" width="500" height="387" /></a></p>
<p><a href="http://cleantechnica.com/2008/06/26/electricity-generation-efficiency-its-not-about-the-technology/" target="_blank">Power plants play a huge role in emitting pollutants that make up the ozone.</a> This pollution browns and blackens our horizons. We call it smog. Smog has been linked to premature deaths, thousands of emergency room visits, and tens of thousands of asthma attacks each year. Pollution in the ozone is particularly dangerous to small children and the elderly, who are often warned to stay indoors on days with poor air quality due to pollutants.</p>
<p>Not only are the pollutants spewed out by power plants bad for our health, but they contain greenhouse gases that have been linked with climate change; thus they are killing the world as we know it as well.</p>
<p><a href="http://planetsave.com/blog/2009/07/15/breaths-of-fresh-air-bush-era-pollution-waivers-rejected-by-courts/" class="more-link">Read more of this story &#187;</a></p>
]]></description>
    <wfw:commentRss>http://planetsave.com/blog/2009/07/15/breaths-of-fresh-air-bush-era-pollution-waivers-rejected-by-courts/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>Fisherman Faces Year in Jail for Harming Humpback Whale</title>
    <link>http://planetsave.com/blog/2009/03/10/fisherman-faces-year-in-jail-for-harming-humpback-whale/</link>
    <comments>http://planetsave.com/blog/2009/03/10/fisherman-faces-year-in-jail-for-harming-humpback-whale/#comments</comments>
    <pubDate>Tue, 10 Mar 2009 01:29:53 +0000</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Alex Felsinger</dc:creator>
    
		<category><![CDATA[Nature &amp; Conservation]]></category>

    <guid isPermaLink="false">http://planetsave.com/blog/2009/03/10/fisherman-faces-year-in-jail-for-harming-humpback-whale/</guid>
    <description><![CDATA[<h3><a href="http://planetsave.com/files/2009/03/humpbackwhale.jpg"><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-4243" src="http://go635254.s3.amazonaws.com/planetsave/files/2009/03/humpbackwhale.jpg" alt="" width="500" height="333" /></a></h3>
<h3>Fishing nets often inadvertantly become entangled around whales, and while that is a crime under the Endangered Species Act, hardly anyone ever faces charges. But one unlucky fisherman has been caught in the act.</h3>
<p>Robert J. Eldridge Jr. faces up to a year in prison and a $100,000 fine if convicted of three felony charges.</p>

<p>The district attorney says he &#8220;did knowingly and unlawfully take a marine mammal, to wit, a humpback whale in waters under the jurisdiction of the United States by acts of pursuit, torment, and annoyance which had the potential to injure said marine mammal in the wild.&#8221;</p>
<p><a href="http://planetsave.com/blog/2009/03/10/fisherman-faces-year-in-jail-for-harming-humpback-whale/" class="more-link">Read more of this story &#187;</a></p>
]]></description>
    <wfw:commentRss>http://planetsave.com/blog/2009/03/10/fisherman-faces-year-in-jail-for-harming-humpback-whale/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>Not guilty: Greenpeace Activists Who Used Climate Change as a Legal Defence</title>
    <link>http://ecoworldly.com/2009/03/06/not-guilty-greenpeace-activists-who-used-climate-change-as-a-legal-defence/</link>
    <comments>http://ecoworldly.com/2009/03/06/not-guilty-greenpeace-activists-who-used-climate-change-as-a-legal-defence/#comments</comments>
    <pubDate>Fri, 06 Mar 2009 03:13:55 +0000</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>The Guardian Environment Network</dc:creator>
    
		<category><![CDATA[About Society]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[In Europe]]></category>

    <guid isPermaLink="false">http://ecoworldly.com/2009/03/06/not-guilty-greenpeace-activists-who-used-climate-change-as-a-legal-defence/</guid>
    <description><![CDATA[<h3>Six Greenpeace climate change activists have been cleared of causing £30,000 of criminal damage at a coal-fired power station in a verdict that is expected to embarrass the government and lead to more direct action protests against energy companies. <em>Article by John Vidal of the <a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/environment" target="_blank">Guardian</a>.</em><a href="http://ecoworldly.com/files/2009/03/5-of-the-kingsnorth-6-who-in.jpg"><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-2429" src="http://go635254.s3.amazonaws.com/ecoworldly/files/2009/03/5-of-the-kingsnorth-6-who-in.jpg" alt="5 of the \" width="430" height="240" /></a></h3>
<p>The jury of nine men and three women at Maidstone crown court cleared the six by a majority verdict. Five of the protesters had scaled a 200-metre chimney at Kingsnorth power station, Hoo, Kent, in October last year.</p>
<p style="text-align: left">
<p><a href="http://ecoworldly.com/2009/03/06/not-guilty-greenpeace-activists-who-used-climate-change-as-a-legal-defence/" class="more-link">Read more of this story &#187;</a></p>
]]></description>
    <wfw:commentRss>http://ecoworldly.com/2009/03/06/not-guilty-greenpeace-activists-who-used-climate-change-as-a-legal-defence/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>Sentencing Activists to Community Service is Hilarious</title>
    <link>http://planetsave.com/blog/2009/03/05/sentencing-activists-to-community-service-is-hilarious/</link>
    <comments>http://planetsave.com/blog/2009/03/05/sentencing-activists-to-community-service-is-hilarious/#comments</comments>
    <pubDate>Thu, 05 Mar 2009 17:38:34 +0000</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Alex Felsinger</dc:creator>
    
		<category><![CDATA[Action &amp; Activism]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

    <guid isPermaLink="false">http://planetsave.com/blog/2009/03/05/sentencing-activists-to-community-service-is-hilarious/</guid>
    <description><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://planetsave.com/files/2009/03/plantingtrees.jpg"><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-4209" src="http://go635254.s3.amazonaws.com/planetsave/files/2009/03/plantingtrees.jpg" alt="" width="500" height="333" /></a></p>
<p><strong>While I&#8217;ve noticed this phenomenon quite a few times before, yesterday&#8217;s sentencing of three Earth First! activists in Maine reminded me of the amazing backwards-notion that forcing activists into community service somehow amounts to a punishment.</strong></p>

<p>Activists who engage in civil disobedience aren&#8217;t hoodlums running around the streets or menaces to society &#8212; these are people who risk arrest and jail time to make a difference in their communities. A judge need-not assign community service because it&#8217;s almost guaranteed that these people already do more than most.</p>
<p><a href="http://planetsave.com/blog/2009/03/05/sentencing-activists-to-community-service-is-hilarious/" class="more-link">Read more of this story &#187;</a></p>
]]></description>
    <wfw:commentRss>http://planetsave.com/blog/2009/03/05/sentencing-activists-to-community-service-is-hilarious/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>Cancer Victim&#8217;s Widow Awarded $8 Mil. in Philip Morris Lawsuit</title>
    <link>http://planetsave.com/blog/2009/02/19/cancer-victims-widow-awarded-8-mil-in-philip-morris-lawsuit/</link>
    <comments>http://planetsave.com/blog/2009/02/19/cancer-victims-widow-awarded-8-mil-in-philip-morris-lawsuit/#comments</comments>
    <pubDate>Thu, 19 Feb 2009 20:13:48 +0000</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Alex Felsinger</dc:creator>
    
		<category><![CDATA[Health]]></category>

    <guid isPermaLink="false">http://planetsave.com/blog/2009/02/19/cancer-victims-widow-awarded-8-mil-in-philip-morris-lawsuit/</guid>
    <description><![CDATA[<h3><a href="http://planetsave.com/files/2009/02/cigarettes.jpg"><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-4072" src="http://go635254.s3.amazonaws.com/planetsave/files/2009/02/cigarettes.jpg" alt="" width="500" height="333" /></a></h3>
<h3>In a ruling that could impact thousands of similar cases, a Florida jury has ordered <a href="http://www.knowmore.org/wiki/index.php?title=Altria_Group%2C_Inc." target="_blank">Philip Morris</a>, the largest tobacco company in the US, to pay the family of a lung cancer victim $8 million in damages.</h3>

<p>Elaine Hess presented evidence to the jury showing that her husband Stuart had smoked three packs of cigarettes every day before dying of lung cancer at only 55. Philip Morris&#8217; attorney argued that Hess had the free will to quit at any time, but the jury didn&#8217;t buy it.</p>
<p><a href="http://planetsave.com/blog/2009/02/19/cancer-victims-widow-awarded-8-mil-in-philip-morris-lawsuit/" class="more-link">Read more of this story &#187;</a></p>
]]></description>
    <wfw:commentRss>http://planetsave.com/blog/2009/02/19/cancer-victims-widow-awarded-8-mil-in-philip-morris-lawsuit/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>Settlement Acknowledges Global Repercussions of Fossil Fuels</title>
    <link>http://sustainablog.org/2009/02/09/settlement-acknowledges-global-repercussions-of-fossil-fuels/</link>
    <comments>http://sustainablog.org/2009/02/09/settlement-acknowledges-global-repercussions-of-fossil-fuels/#comments</comments>
    <pubDate>Tue, 10 Feb 2009 01:30:13 +0000</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Leslie Berliant</dc:creator>
    
		<category><![CDATA[Climate change]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Energy &amp; Fuel]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Environmental Policies]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[International]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Money &amp; Finance]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>

    <guid isPermaLink="false">http://sustainablog.org/2009/02/09/settlement-acknowledges-global-repercussions-of-fossil-fuels/</guid>
    <description><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://sustainablog.org/files/2009/02/money.jpg"><img class="alignleft size-medium wp-image-4159" src="http://go635254.s3.amazonaws.com/sustainablog/files/2009/02/money-300x300.jpg" alt="money" width="300" height="300" /></a></p>
<h3>During the eight environmentally dismal years of the Bush administration, environmental advocates learned how to effectively use the U.S. court system to aid their cause.  We saw this with a number of lawsuits including the Supreme Court’s ruling in <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Massachusetts_v._Environmental_Protection_Agency">Massachusetts v. EPA</a> that carbon dioxide and other greenhouse gases are pollutants that can be regulated under the Clean Air Act.</h3>
<p>Now <a href="http://www.greenpeace.org/">Greenpeace</a>, <a href="http://www.foe.org/">Friends of the Earth</a> and 4 cities, including my very own hometown of Santa Monica, California, have settled a suit of almost 7 years (Friends of the Earth, Inc., et al. v. Spinelli, et al.) that will force two U.S. government run financing agencies, Export-Import Bank of the United States and the Overseas Private Investment Corporation, to take into account the effects of their overseas projects on climate change.</p>
<p><a href="http://sustainablog.org/2009/02/09/settlement-acknowledges-global-repercussions-of-fossil-fuels/" class="more-link">Read more of this story &#187;</a></p>
]]></description>
    <wfw:commentRss>http://sustainablog.org/2009/02/09/settlement-acknowledges-global-repercussions-of-fossil-fuels/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>Man Who Killed Emu &#8216;For Christmas Lunch&#8217; Fined Paltry $2,500</title>
    <link>http://planetsave.com/blog/2009/02/03/man-who-killed-emu-for-christmas-lunch-fined-paltry-2500/</link>
    <comments>http://planetsave.com/blog/2009/02/03/man-who-killed-emu-for-christmas-lunch-fined-paltry-2500/#comments</comments>
    <pubDate>Tue, 03 Feb 2009 14:03:12 +0000</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Andrew Williams</dc:creator>
    
		<category><![CDATA[Anti-Environmentalism]]></category>

    <guid isPermaLink="false">http://planetsave.com/blog/2009/02/03/man-who-killed-emu-for-christmas-lunch-fined-paltry-2500/</guid>
    <description><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://planetsave.com/files/2009/02/emu-australia.jpg"><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-3919" src="http://go635254.s3.amazonaws.com/planetsave/files/2009/02/emu-australia.jpg" alt="" width="500" height="331" /></a></p>

<p><strong>A man who <a title="emu killed australia" href="http://www.abc.net.au/news/stories/2009/02/03/2481222.htm" target="_blank">stabbed an Emu to death &#8216;because he wanted to eat it for Christmas lunch&#8217;</a> has been fined almost A$4,000 (US$2,500) for animal cruelty.</strong></p>
<p>An Australian court heard that, two days before Christmas, Patrick James Andrews, 23, crept into the Emu enclosure at Alexandra zoo in south-east Queensland, where he repeatedly stabbed a 30-year-old Emu named Mary, before cutting its legs off. Zoo staff later found the animal dead in its enclosure.</p>
<p><a href="http://planetsave.com/blog/2009/02/03/man-who-killed-emu-for-christmas-lunch-fined-paltry-2500/" class="more-link">Read more of this story &#187;</a></p>
]]></description>
    <wfw:commentRss>http://planetsave.com/blog/2009/02/03/man-who-killed-emu-for-christmas-lunch-fined-paltry-2500/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>Toxic Ship Firm Fined $500k For Illegal Sale of Deadly PCBs</title>
    <link>http://redgreenandblue.org/2009/01/30/toxic-ship-firm-fined-500k-for-illegal-sale-of-deadly-pcbs/</link>
    <comments>http://redgreenandblue.org/2009/01/30/toxic-ship-firm-fined-500k-for-illegal-sale-of-deadly-pcbs/#comments</comments>
    <pubDate>Fri, 30 Jan 2009 13:31:36 +0000</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Andrew Williams</dc:creator>
    
		<category><![CDATA[Leader]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Liberal]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[World]]></category>

    <guid isPermaLink="false">http://redgreenandblue.org/2009/01/30/toxic-ship-firm-fined-500k-for-illegal-sale-of-deadly-pcbs/</guid>
    <description><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://go635254.s3.amazonaws.com/redgreenandblue/files/2009/01/toxic-ship.jpg"><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-2368" src="http://go635254.s3.amazonaws.com/redgreenandblue/files/2009/01/toxic-ship.jpg" alt="" width="500" height="375" /></a></p>

<p><strong>The US Environmental Protection Agency has <a title="toxic ship" href="http://www.ens-newswire.com/ens/jan2009/2009-01-29-094.asp" target="_blank">imposed a record fine on a toxic ship dealer</a> for attempting to export a ship containing deadly polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs) to the infamous shipbreaking beaches of South Asia.</strong></p>
<p>Toxic Trade pressure group Basel Action Network claimed victory after Global Shipping LLC and Global Marketing Systems, Inc. were ordered to pay $518,500 for the alleged illegal distribution and export of a ship containing PCBs in violation of the Toxic Substances Control Act.</p>
<p>Commenting on the judgement, Jim Puckett, Executive Director of Basel Action Network said, &#8220;&#8221;While half a million dollars is not much of a financial deterrent for such actors when a single ship can be worth well over $5 million in scrap steel, they are now on notice - another such export would be a &#8220;knowing and willful&#8221; criminal violation, and they could find themselves behind bars.&#8221;</p>
<p>The action was brought after Basel Action Network and the Save the Classic Liners Campaign informed the EPA when they discovered that Global Marketing Systems, Inc. had bought the SS Oceanic, a cruise ship formerly known as the SS Independence.</p>
<p>The company towed the toxic ship out of San Francisco Bay intending to scrap the vessel on the beaches of India and Bangladesh in South Asia.</p>
<p>&#8220;While the Oceanic wasn&#8217;t recalled to the U.S., we&#8217;re very happy that EPA took their job seriously and that one of the world&#8217;s leading exporters and exploiters of the infamous shipbreaking beaches of South Asia has finally been held to account,&#8221; said Puckett.</p>
<p>Around 700 toxic ships are exported to the once pristine beaches of Asia for scrapping. The coastline is now strewn with a cocktail of polluting material including, machinery parts, oil rags and leaking barrels. The local air is poisoned by open fires, the land and surrounding water are contaminated by asbestos, heavy metals, dioxins and other persistent organic pollutants and the workers are unprotected from toxic substances, explosions and falling steel.</p>
<p>Image Credit - <a title="toxic ship" href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/misserion/2275742553/" target="_blank">misserion</a> via flickr on a Creative Commons license</p>
]]></description>
    <wfw:commentRss>http://redgreenandblue.org/2009/01/30/toxic-ship-firm-fined-500k-for-illegal-sale-of-deadly-pcbs/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>Chevron Acquitted in Nigerian Human Rights Case, Appeal Expected</title>
    <link>http://planetsave.com/blog/2008/12/02/chevron-acquitted-in-nigerian-human-rights-case-appeal-expected/</link>
    <comments>http://planetsave.com/blog/2008/12/02/chevron-acquitted-in-nigerian-human-rights-case-appeal-expected/#comments</comments>
    <pubDate>Tue, 02 Dec 2008 06:32:41 +0000</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Alex Felsinger</dc:creator>
    
		<category><![CDATA[War &amp; Conflict]]></category>

    <guid isPermaLink="false">http://planetsave.com/blog/2008/12/02/chevron-acquitted-in-nigerian-human-rights-case-appeal-expected/</guid>
    <description><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://planetsave.com/files/2008/12/chevrongasstation.jpg"><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-3385" src="http://go635254.s3.amazonaws.com/planetsave/files/2008/12/chevrongasstation.jpg" alt="" width="500" height="317" /></a></p>
<p><strong>A federal jury <a href="http://abclocal.go.com/kgo/story?section=news/business&#38;id=6533094" target="_blank">ruled yesterday that Chevron had done nothing wrong  a decade ago when it called the Nigerian military to control protesters who had taken control of an oil platform</a>, demanding better treatment and jobs.</strong></p>

<p>In the end, the military killed two protesters. Accounts of the incident vary drastically: Chevron says the protesters were violent, armed, and had taken workers hostage, while the protesters and their lawyers claim they had been entirely peaceful and engaged in civil disobedience.</p>
<p><a href="http://planetsave.com/blog/2008/12/02/chevron-acquitted-in-nigerian-human-rights-case-appeal-expected/" class="more-link">Read more of this story &#187;</a></p>
]]></description>
    <wfw:commentRss>http://planetsave.com/blog/2008/12/02/chevron-acquitted-in-nigerian-human-rights-case-appeal-expected/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>US Supreme Court Sides With Navy In Whales Sonar Case</title>
    <link>http://redgreenandblue.org/2008/11/13/us-supreme-court-sides-with-navy-in-whales-sonar-case/</link>
    <comments>http://redgreenandblue.org/2008/11/13/us-supreme-court-sides-with-navy-in-whales-sonar-case/#comments</comments>
    <pubDate>Thu, 13 Nov 2008 14:15:16 +0000</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Andrew Williams</dc:creator>
    
		<category><![CDATA[Conservative]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Leader]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Other Politics]]></category>

    <guid isPermaLink="false">http://redgreenandblue.org/2008/11/13/us-supreme-court-sides-with-navy-in-whales-sonar-case/</guid>
    <description><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://redgreenandblue.org/files/2008/11/whale-tail.jpg"><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-1587" src="http://go635254.s3.amazonaws.com/redgreenandblue/files/2008/11/whale-tail.jpg" alt="" width="500" height="361" /></a></p>

<p><strong>In a landmark case, the US Supreme Court ruled yesterday that the <a href="http://uk.reuters.com/article/scienceNews/idUKTRE4AB51L20081112?pageNumber=1&#38;virtualBrandChannel=0">US Navy can carry out sonar </a>training exercises off the southern California coast, without safeguards designed to protect whales, dolphins and other marine mammals.</strong></p>
<p>The decision is a major setback for environmentalists, who had hoped the Court would uphold <strong>an <a href="http://redgreenandblue.org/2008/10/08/the-us-navy-doesnt-save-the-whales/">earlier injunction</a> by a federal judge requiring the navy to take precautions while undertaking submarine-hunting exercises</strong>. Environmental groups originally launched the lawsuit claiming that the <strong>use of sonar can injure or even kill a wide range of marine species</strong>, including sea-lions and <strong><a title="whales" href="http://sustainablog.org/2008/10/03/exxon-oil-and-gas-project-to-face-russian-legal-challenge-over-endangered-whales/" target="_self">endangered</a></strong> blue whales.</p>
<p><a href="http://redgreenandblue.org/2008/11/13/us-supreme-court-sides-with-navy-in-whales-sonar-case/" class="more-link">Read more of this story &#187;</a></p>
]]></description>
    <wfw:commentRss>http://redgreenandblue.org/2008/11/13/us-supreme-court-sides-with-navy-in-whales-sonar-case/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>Another North Dakota &#8220;David&#8221; Challenges the DEA</title>
    <link>http://maxlindberg.greenoptions.com/2007/10/30/another-north-dakota-david-challenges-the-dea/</link>
    <comments>http://maxlindberg.greenoptions.com/2007/10/30/another-north-dakota-david-challenges-the-dea/#comments</comments>
    <pubDate>Tue, 30 Oct 2007 19:15:37 +0000</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Max Lindberg</dc:creator>
    
		<category><![CDATA[Renewable Power]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[activism]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[amicus brief]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[court]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[farmers]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[federal court]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[federal court suit]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[food]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[gorvernor arnold schwarzenegger]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[hemp]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[industrial hemp]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[lawsuit]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[marihuana]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[marijuana]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[ndsu]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[north dakota]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[north dakota state university]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[schwarzenegger]]></category>

    <guid isPermaLink="false">http://maxlindberg.greenoptions.com/2007/10/30/another-north-dakota-david-challenges-the-dea/</guid>
    <description><![CDATA[<p>
<img src="/files/430/hemp.jpg" border="0" alt="" width="240" height="166" align="right" />I love David and Goliath stories, and the recent news from North Dakota is just that: two farmers and a publicly funded land grant university sticking it to the U.S. Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA).  As you know from an earlier article on <a href="/2007/10/16/california_governor_nixes_industrial_hemp_while_north_dakota_moves_on">Green Options</a> , and my subsequent podcast <a href="/2007/10/18/greening_the_golden_years_podcast_hemp_the_north_dakota_story">Greening the Golden Years Podcast: Hemp, The North Dakota Story</a>,  two North Dakota farmers, State Rep. Dave Monson and Wayne Hauge filed a lawsuit to end the DEA&#8217;s ban on state-regulated commercial hemp farming in the U.S.
</p>
<p>
Now comes North Dakota State University, with a current student body of around 12,000, filing an amicus brief in support of the two farmers.  And NDSU has its own bone to pick with the DEA: an almost unbelievable snub of the small school.
</p>
<p>
In 1999, according to a news release from <a href="http://www.votehemp.com/PR/10-29-07_ndsu_files_amicus.htm">Vote Hemp</a>, the university applied for permission to grow non-drug industrial hemp to create varieties best suited for the North Dakota climate and soil conditions.  The DEA, according to the release, has chosen to ignore completely the 8 year old request.  How&#8217;s that for big brother arrogance?
</p>
<p>
The DEA still holds that industrial hemp, almost completely bereft of the hallucinogenic compound that produces a &#34;high,&#34; can be used as a drug.  I read somewhere that smoking industrial hemp would produce nothing more than a bad headache.<!--break-->
</p>
<p>
According to the news release,
</p>
<blockquote><p>
	Gold can hypothetically and has in some instances been extracted from seawater, but the minimal concentration makes it technically and economically inefficient and commercially non-viable to do so. There are trace opiates in poppy seeds consumed on bagels, that could also be hypothetically be concentrated; but just as with industrial hemp is not a practical source of drugs for the illicit market
</p></blockquote>
<p>
So what&#8217;s the big deal, DEA?
</p>
<p>
The farmers&#8217; case will be heard in federal court on Wednesday, November 14, 2007, in Bismark, North Dakota.  A press conference will follow, and I&#8217;ll have an article and hopefully an interview that same day.
</p>
<p>
In any case, let&#8217;s hear it loud and clear for the &#34;Davids&#34; of this world who aren&#8217;t afraid to stand up and cry &#34;foul.&#34;  It&#8217;s time someone put the DEA&#8217;s feet to the fire.  Governor Arnold Schwarzenegger of California could have set up the same scenario by signing a bill that passed through the state legislature, asking for approval to grow industrial hemp in four California counties.  Arnold obviously didn&#8217;t have the stomach for a possible showdown with the DEA, and vetoed the publicly supported legislation.  Strange, too, because Schwarzenegger has been a big proponent of environmentalism, but, on the other hand had the temerity <a href="http://www.planetsave.com/blog/2007/10/29/arnold-tells-british-mag-marijuana-is-not-a-drug/">to tell a columnist</a> that &#34;marijuana is not a drug, it&#8217;s a leaf.&#34;</p>
]]></description>
    <wfw:commentRss>http://maxlindberg.greenoptions.com/2007/10/30/another-north-dakota-david-challenges-the-dea/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
  </item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- 473 queries in 1.391 seconds. -->