<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
  xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
  xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
  >

<channel>
  <title>Green Options &#187; democratic values</title>
  <link>http://greenoptions.com/tag/democratic-values</link>
  <description>Posts tagged 'democratic values'</description>
  <pubDate>Thu, 30 Oct 2008 08:09:02 +0000</pubDate>
  <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
  <language>en</language>
  <item>
    <title>What Does Economic Populism Mean For The Green Economy?</title>
    <link>http://inspiredeconomist.com/2008/10/30/what-does-economic-populism-mean-for-the-green-economy/</link>
    <comments>http://inspiredeconomist.com/2008/10/30/what-does-economic-populism-mean-for-the-green-economy/#comments</comments>
    <pubDate>Thu, 30 Oct 2008 08:09:02 +0000</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Reenita Malhotra</dc:creator>
    
		<category><![CDATA[Opinion]]></category>

    <guid isPermaLink="false">http://inspiredeconomist.com/2008/10/30/what-does-economic-populism-mean-for-the-green-economy/</guid>
    <description><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://inspiredeconomist.com/files/2008/10/warren.jpg"></a></p>
<h3><img class="reflect" src="http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3030/2841297240_0cc4e2209d.jpg?v=0" alt="warren_buffet_when_the_tides_run_out by One Trick Pony in FlickR." width="212" height="382" />Economic Populism appears to be back in vogue. Given the<a href="http://inspiredeconomist.com/2008/10/15/economy-in-recession-the-cost-of-allowing-lehman-brothers-to-fail/" target="_blank"> fall of Lehman Brothers</a> and the Wall Street machine, the economic banter clearly seems to be &#8220;the people&#8221; versus &#8220;the <a title="Elite" href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Elite">elites</a>.</h3>
<h3></h3>
<p>Economic populism involves an economic philosophy urging social and political system changes. In the current political and economic climate, the public concern over the inequity of wealth appears to be at a peak. There is a growing call by Senator <a title="Socialism vs. Capitalism" href="http://inspiredeconomist.com/2008/10/22/election-coundown-socialism-vs-capitalism/" target="_blank">Barack Obama</a> and democrats to raise taxes on the wealthy to shrink the wealth gap. But is it true that the rich are getting richer? Or are the rich actually in danger of losing a significant portion of the nation&#8217;s wealth? Are the democrats worried about a problem that’s already being fixed by the markets?</p>
<p><strong>Emmanuel Saez</strong>, the income-share expert and economics professor at the <strong>University of California, Berkeley</strong> told <strong>Robert Frank of the Wall Street Journa</strong>l that during the Great Depression, the income and wealth of the top 1% of society fell drastically. (<a href="http://blogs.wsj.com/wealth/2008/10/22/why-the-rich-are-losing-their-share-of-wealth/?mod=loomia&#38;loomia_si=t0:a16:g4:r1:c0:b0" target="_blank">Read here for the full story)</a>. If history is to be believed then this will happen again especially if Obama becomes president.
<p><a href="http://inspiredeconomist.com/2008/10/30/what-does-economic-populism-mean-for-the-green-economy/" class="more-link">Read more of this story &#187;</a></p>
]]></description>
    <wfw:commentRss>http://inspiredeconomist.com/2008/10/30/what-does-economic-populism-mean-for-the-green-economy/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>Election Countdown: Socialism Vs. Capitalism</title>
    <link>http://inspiredeconomist.com/2008/10/22/election-coundown-socialism-vs-capitalism/</link>
    <comments>http://inspiredeconomist.com/2008/10/22/election-coundown-socialism-vs-capitalism/#comments</comments>
    <pubDate>Wed, 22 Oct 2008 22:45:22 +0000</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Reenita Malhotra</dc:creator>
    
		<category><![CDATA[Leadership]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>

    <guid isPermaLink="false">http://inspiredeconomist.com/2008/10/22/election-coundown-socialism-vs-capitalism/</guid>
    <description><![CDATA[<h3>Grim Outlook On the Economy Right Before the Elections</h3>
<p><a href="http://inspiredeconomist.com/files/2008/10/ss-080701-nominees-teasethumb.jpg"><img class="alignleft size-full wp-image-790" src="http://go635254.s3.amazonaws.com/inspiredeconomist/files/2008/10/ss-080701-nominees-teasethumb.jpg" alt="" width="98" height="74" /></a><strong>As retail sales decline, manufacturing slows and unemployment benefit claims rise, the economic situation looks more grim by the day. Rises in the stock market that show a glimmer of hope are invariably followed by dips.  The housing markets declines steadily and the recession shows signs of lingering well into next year. George Bush has called for a mid November summit to discuss the international economic situation.</strong> <strong><em>(Reuters)</em></strong></p>
<p>With the U.S. Presidential elections less than two weeks away, both candidates are heavily focused upon the economy as their chief task. The <a href="http://inspiredeconomist.com/2008/10/15/economy-in-recession-the-cost-of-allowing-lehman-brothers-to-fail/" target="_blank">declining economic situation</a> propelled by the fall of <a href="http://inspiredeconomist.com/2008/09/15/lehman-brothers-collapse-new-economic-architecture-required/" target="_blank">Lehman Brothers</a> has certainly worked in Obama&#8217;s favor. People are associating the bad economy with Republican values.  Both candidates have outlined an aggressive economic recovery plan.
<p><a href="http://inspiredeconomist.com/2008/10/22/election-coundown-socialism-vs-capitalism/" class="more-link">Read more of this story &#187;</a></p>
]]></description>
    <wfw:commentRss>http://inspiredeconomist.com/2008/10/22/election-coundown-socialism-vs-capitalism/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
  </item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- 119 queries in 0.370 seconds. -->