<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
  xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
  xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
  >

<channel>
  <title>Green Options &#187; developing countries</title>
  <link>http://greenoptions.com/tag/developing-countries</link>
  <description>Posts tagged 'developing countries'</description>
  <pubDate>Sat, 31 Oct 2009 11:56:03 +0000</pubDate>
  <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
  <language>en</language>
  <item>
    <title>Developing Countries Gain Leverage Over Developed Nations Ahead of Copenhagen Talks</title>
    <link>http://redgreenandblue.org/2009/10/31/developing-countries-gain-leverage-over-developed-nations-ahead-of-copenhagen-talks/</link>
    <comments>http://redgreenandblue.org/2009/10/31/developing-countries-gain-leverage-over-developed-nations-ahead-of-copenhagen-talks/#comments</comments>
    <pubDate>Sat, 31 Oct 2009 11:56:03 +0000</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Mridul Chadha</dc:creator>
    
		<category><![CDATA[Climate Change]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Policy]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[World]]></category>

    <guid isPermaLink="false">http://redgreenandblue.org/2009/10/31/developing-countries-gain-leverage-over-developed-nations-ahead-of-copenhagen-talks/</guid>
    <description><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://redgreenandblue.org/files/2009/08/cop15_logo.png"><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-3512" src="http://go635254.s3.amazonaws.com/redgreenandblue/files/2009/08/cop15_logo.png" alt="" width="375" height="374" /></a></p>
<p><strong>In the see saw of that the international climate negotiations is the balance has now shifted towards the developing countries. The developed and developing countries argued vigorously over the one last year and both the parties have moved back and forth several times on their negotiation positions.</strong></p>

<p>The United States under the leadership of President Barack Obama pursued a highly aggressive diplomatic effort which resulted in China agreeing to various mitigation measures including improvement in energy intensity. Taking cue from China various other developing countries too announced ambitious mitigation and clean energy initiatives.</p>
<p>The United States successfully planted seeds of <a href="http://redgreenandblue.org/2009/08/14/developing-countries-a-divided-house-at-climate-talks/" target="_self">division in the developing countries&#8217; camp</a> by singling out China for concentrated talks but what happened transpired throughout the developing world after that was completely unexpected. India, in addition to other developing countries announced several short and long term initiatives as an answer to the increasing international pressure to act on the rising carbon emissions.
<p><a href="http://redgreenandblue.org/2009/10/31/developing-countries-gain-leverage-over-developed-nations-ahead-of-copenhagen-talks/" class="more-link">Read more of this story &#187;</a></p>
]]></description>
    <wfw:commentRss>http://redgreenandblue.org/2009/10/31/developing-countries-gain-leverage-over-developed-nations-ahead-of-copenhagen-talks/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>US Playing Spoilsport at International Climate Negotiations?</title>
    <link>http://redgreenandblue.org/2009/09/30/us-playing-spoilsport-at-international-climate-negotiations/</link>
    <comments>http://redgreenandblue.org/2009/09/30/us-playing-spoilsport-at-international-climate-negotiations/#comments</comments>
    <pubDate>Wed, 30 Sep 2009 09:08:45 +0000</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Mridul Chadha</dc:creator>
    
		<category><![CDATA[Climate Change]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Choice]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[U.S.]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[World]]></category>

    <guid isPermaLink="false">http://redgreenandblue.org/2009/09/30/us-playing-spoilsport-at-international-climate-negotiations/</guid>
    <description><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://redgreenandblue.org/files/2009/05/us-flag.jpg"><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-3192" src="http://go635254.s3.amazonaws.com/redgreenandblue/files/2009/05/us-flag.jpg" alt="" width="500" height="281" /></a></p>
<p><strong>Just as it seemed that differences over contentious issues regarding the next climate treaty were ironing out and all parties moving ahead with a common agenda, the developed countries, US in particular, threatened to stall negotiations until developing countries <a href="http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/news/environment/global-warming/India-led-effort-makes-US-bite-dust-on-climate/articleshow/5070284.cms" target="_blank">pledge equal emission reduction measures</a>. </strong></p>

<p>According to new reports, American negotiators demanded that there should be similar mitigation obligations for developed as well developing countries. The demand was strictly against the unanimous decision to draw distinction between capacities of developed and developing nations to reduce carbon emissions taken at the Bali Climate Conference in 2007.</p>
<p>Developing countries, led by India, opposed the demand in one voice and forced the <a href="http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/news/environment/global-warming/India-led-effort-makes-US-bite-dust-on-climate/articleshow/5070284.cms" target="_blank">American negotiators to back down</a>.</p>
<p>United States&#8217; stance came as a surprise given that officials from the Obama administration have been in constant talks with various developing countries and that these talks have resulted in many developing countries agreeing to voluntary emission reduction plans. It was that since the carbon output of most developing countries is much less than that of developed countries and that they are not technically and financially equipped to take up bold mitigation measures a clear differentiation between mitigation measures taken up by the two parties.
<p><a href="http://redgreenandblue.org/2009/09/30/us-playing-spoilsport-at-international-climate-negotiations/" class="more-link">Read more of this story &#187;</a></p>
]]></description>
    <wfw:commentRss>http://redgreenandblue.org/2009/09/30/us-playing-spoilsport-at-international-climate-negotiations/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>EU says advanced developing countries have ample financial resources, refuses to provide climate change funds</title>
    <link>http://redgreenandblue.org/2009/09/12/eu-says-advanced-developing-countries-have-ample-financial-resources-refuses-to-provide-climate-change-funds/</link>
    <comments>http://redgreenandblue.org/2009/09/12/eu-says-advanced-developing-countries-have-ample-financial-resources-refuses-to-provide-climate-change-funds/#comments</comments>
    <pubDate>Sat, 12 Sep 2009 12:52:13 +0000</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Mridul Chadha</dc:creator>
    
		<category><![CDATA[Climate Change]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[EC Leader]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Choice]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[World]]></category>

    <guid isPermaLink="false">http://redgreenandblue.org/2009/09/12/eu-says-advanced-developing-countries-have-ample-financial-resources-refuses-to-provide-climate-change-funds/</guid>
    <description><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://redgreenandblue.org/files/2009/06/eu-flag.jpg"><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-3277" src="http://go635254.s3.amazonaws.com/redgreenandblue/files/2009/06/eu-flag.jpg" alt="" width="500" height="375" /></a></p>
<p><strong>The European Union has proposed a </strong><a href="http://www.livemint.com/2009/09/11215220/European-proposal-on-climate-f.html?h=B" target="_blank"><strong>climate change funding</strong></a><strong> of €2-15 billion every year for developing countries to help them make transition from fossil fuel based energy systems to clean energy based systems. However, EU does not see the advanced developing counties like India and China eligible for this financial help.</strong></p>

<p>EU in its <em>Globa</em><em>l Finance Blueprint for Ambitious Action by Developing Nations</em> paper stated that advanced developing countries should contribute to the climate adaptation fund instead of expecting funds for themselves. According to the paper, advanced developing countries posses ample financial resources to initiate and sustain emission reduction programs.</p>
<blockquote><p><em>The Commission said that from 2013, it would depend on the carbon market to fund 40% of the money required for climate change mitigation and adaptation in developing nations. The emerging economies should be able to generate 20-40% of the proposed global fund, it said. The remaining—around $22-50 billion a year—will be paid for by the European Union and the rest of the developed nations.</em></p></blockquote>
<p>Developing countries have been at loggerheads with the developed countries on the issue of <a href="http://www.celsias.com/article/differences-over-technology-transfer-and-carbon-ta/" target="_blank">funding for adaptation to clean fuel technologies</a>. Decision to set up an adaptation fund for helping poor and developing countries was taken at the Bali climate conference in 2007. However, the developed countries are yet to act on their promises of aid as they find themselves constrained by the global economic crisis and objections by their own people.
<p><a href="http://redgreenandblue.org/2009/09/12/eu-says-advanced-developing-countries-have-ample-financial-resources-refuses-to-provide-climate-change-funds/" class="more-link">Read more of this story &#187;</a></p>
]]></description>
    <wfw:commentRss>http://redgreenandblue.org/2009/09/12/eu-says-advanced-developing-countries-have-ample-financial-resources-refuses-to-provide-climate-change-funds/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>India Impressed By Obama&#8217;s Stand on Climate Change But Demands More From Developed Nations</title>
    <link>http://redgreenandblue.org/2009/02/28/india-impressed-by-obamas-stand-on-climate-change-but-demands-more-from-developed-nations/</link>
    <comments>http://redgreenandblue.org/2009/02/28/india-impressed-by-obamas-stand-on-climate-change-but-demands-more-from-developed-nations/#comments</comments>
    <pubDate>Sat, 28 Feb 2009 08:10:42 +0000</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Mridul Chadha</dc:creator>
    
		<category><![CDATA[Center]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Climate Change]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Leader]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Policy]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[World]]></category>

    <guid isPermaLink="false">http://redgreenandblue.org/2009/02/28/india-impressed-by-obamas-stand-on-climate-change-but-demands-more-from-developed-nations/</guid>
    <description><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://redgreenandblue.org/files/2008/12/barack-obama.jpg"><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-1986" src="http://go635254.s3.amazonaws.com/redgreenandblue/files/2008/12/barack-obama.jpg" alt="Developing countries want developed countries to do more before being asked to cut their emissions" width="500" height="334" /></a></p>
<p><strong>While <a href="http://www.reuters.com/article/environmentNews/idUSTRE51Q35J20090227?feedType=RSS&#38;feedName=environmentNews" target="_blank">lauding President Obama</a> for making climate change a central issue in his administration&#8217;s policy the Indian government demanded that more needs to be done on the part of developed nations, especially in regard to setting robust emission reduction goals and funding clean energy projects in developing countries.</strong></p>

<p>Setting the agenda straight for the Copenhagen talks, India&#8217;s envoy on Climate Change said that no workable solution could be reached if the developed countries did not agree to stricter emission reduction goals. He reiterated his country&#8217;s stand that it was not ready to commit to any emission reduction goals. He said that technology transfer and funding of clean energy projects are the biggest issues which could decide the future of the next climate treaty.</p>
<p>The views presented by India&#8217;s envoy are very unfortunate and seem highly unfair. As far as funding is concerned, India and China are the <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:CDM_CER.png" target="_blank">biggest beneficiaries of the Clean Development Mechanism</a> through which developed countries finance clean energy projects in developing countries to offset their own carbon emissions. In terms of greenhouse gas emissions, China is the largest polluter while India is the third largest. This bestows a great share of &#8216;collective but differential&#8217; responsibility on the Asian giants to cut carbon emissions.  
<p><a href="http://redgreenandblue.org/2009/02/28/india-impressed-by-obamas-stand-on-climate-change-but-demands-more-from-developed-nations/" class="more-link">Read more of this story &#187;</a></p>
]]></description>
    <wfw:commentRss>http://redgreenandblue.org/2009/02/28/india-impressed-by-obamas-stand-on-climate-change-but-demands-more-from-developed-nations/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>Obama Plans to Set Example for China, India in the Fight Against Climate Change</title>
    <link>http://redgreenandblue.org/2008/12/24/obama-plans-to-set-example-for-china-india-in-the-fight-against-climate-change/</link>
    <comments>http://redgreenandblue.org/2008/12/24/obama-plans-to-set-example-for-china-india-in-the-fight-against-climate-change/#comments</comments>
    <pubDate>Wed, 24 Dec 2008 09:48:05 +0000</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Mridul Chadha</dc:creator>
    
		<category><![CDATA[Center]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Climate Change]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Choice]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[World]]></category>

    <guid isPermaLink="false">http://redgreenandblue.org/2008/12/24/obama-plans-to-set-example-for-china-india-in-the-fight-against-climate-change/</guid>
    <description><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://go635254.s3.amazonaws.com/redgreenandblue/files/2008/12/barack-obama.jpg"><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-1986" src="http://go635254.s3.amazonaws.com/redgreenandblue/files/2008/12/barack-obama.jpg" alt="" width="500" height="334" /></a></p>
<p>President-elect Barack Obama recently assembled his &#8216;dream green team&#8217; which comprises of some of the best scientific minds of America. This green team symbolizes United States&#8217; first real departure from the ideas that the Bush administration had regarding climate change. Obama seeks to use their expertise to not only create a low-carbon economy while creating <a href="http://redgreenandblue.org/2008/10/14/the-obama-promise-five-million-new-green-jobs/" target="_blank">new jobs</a> but also, in doing so, set <a href="http://www.enn.com/climate/article/38917" target="_blank">example</a> for developing nations so that they could be persuaded to do the same.</p>

<p><a href="http://redgreenandblue.org/2008/12/24/obama-plans-to-set-example-for-china-india-in-the-fight-against-climate-change/" class="more-link">Read more of this story &#187;</a></p>
]]></description>
    <wfw:commentRss>http://redgreenandblue.org/2008/12/24/obama-plans-to-set-example-for-china-india-in-the-fight-against-climate-change/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>Developed, Developing Nations Argue Over Sharing Costs of Cutting Carbon Emissions</title>
    <link>http://redgreenandblue.org/2008/12/20/developed-developing-nations-argue-over-sharing-costs-of-cutting-carbon-emissions/</link>
    <comments>http://redgreenandblue.org/2008/12/20/developed-developing-nations-argue-over-sharing-costs-of-cutting-carbon-emissions/#comments</comments>
    <pubDate>Sun, 21 Dec 2008 01:54:34 +0000</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Mridul Chadha</dc:creator>
    
		<category><![CDATA[Center]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Climate Change]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[World]]></category>

    <guid isPermaLink="false">http://redgreenandblue.org/2008/12/20/developed-developing-nations-argue-over-sharing-costs-of-cutting-carbon-emissions/</guid>
    <description><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://go635254.s3.amazonaws.com/redgreenandblue/files/2008/12/air-poll.jpg"><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-1953" src="http://go635254.s3.amazonaws.com/redgreenandblue/files/2008/12/air-poll.jpg" alt="" width="485" height="360" /></a></p>
<p><strong>There is an urgent need to bring down the rising <a href="http://jasonleggett.greenoptions.com/2007/07/11/green-myth-busting-co2-emissions/" target="_blank">carbon emissions</a> and switch over from the dirty fossil fuels to clean alternative energy sources. Leaders of the developed and developing nations completely agree over this plan of action but, sadly, the agreement between the two ends there. Both parties agree that they have got to act quickly but none is willing to take the initiative on the economic front of the fight against climate change.</strong></p>
<p>Under the <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kyoto_Protocol" target="_blank">Kyoto Protocol</a> the onus of controlling and bringing down the carbon emissions was on the developed nations with the help of tools like the national carbon registry and the emission permits whereas the developing nations were not obligated to any emission cuts. Now that the talks for a new climate treaty have started to gain momentum the developed nations want the developing countries to reduce their carbon emissions under that treaty. And although the developing countries recognize their responsibility in the fight against climate change they are unwilling to bear the full economic burden of the same.</p>
<p><a href="http://redgreenandblue.org/2008/12/20/developed-developing-nations-argue-over-sharing-costs-of-cutting-carbon-emissions/" class="more-link">Read more of this story &#187;</a></p>
]]></description>
    <wfw:commentRss>http://redgreenandblue.org/2008/12/20/developed-developing-nations-argue-over-sharing-costs-of-cutting-carbon-emissions/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>Brazilian Professor Invents Solar Powered WiFi Access Point</title>
    <link>http://ecoworldly.com/2008/10/03/brazilian-professor-invents-solar-powered-wifi-access-point/</link>
    <comments>http://ecoworldly.com/2008/10/03/brazilian-professor-invents-solar-powered-wifi-access-point/#comments</comments>
    <pubDate>Fri, 03 Oct 2008 21:02:14 +0000</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Levi Novey</dc:creator>
    
		<category><![CDATA[In The Americas]]></category>

    <guid isPermaLink="false">http://ecoworldly.com/2008/10/03/brazilian-professor-invents-solar-powered-wifi-access-point/</guid>
    <description><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://ecoworldly.com/files/2008/10/solar-powered-wifi.jpg"><img class="alignleft size-full wp-image-1774" src="http://go635254.s3.amazonaws.com/ecoworldly/files/2008/10/solar-powered-wifi.jpg" alt="Solar Powered WIFI" width="180" height="240" /></a><strong>A professor in Brazil is helping to bring solar powered wireless internet to communities in need. The low-cost &#8220;access point in a box&#8221; he has created needs no internet connection, electricity, or assembly to function. It is being tested on lamp posts in a number of locations. Innovations such as these are becoming more common around the world, and are leveling the economic playing field and creating countless benefits for people who could otherwise not pay for the internet.</strong></p>
<p>
<p><a href="http://ecoworldly.com/2008/10/03/brazilian-professor-invents-solar-powered-wifi-access-point/" class="more-link">Read more of this story &#187;</a></p>
]]></description>
    <wfw:commentRss>http://ecoworldly.com/2008/10/03/brazilian-professor-invents-solar-powered-wifi-access-point/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>Should Poor Developing Countries Give A Hoot About Going Green?</title>
    <link>http://ecoworldly.com/2008/06/17/should-poor-developing-countries-give-a-hoot-about-going-green/</link>
    <comments>http://ecoworldly.com/2008/06/17/should-poor-developing-countries-give-a-hoot-about-going-green/#comments</comments>
    <pubDate>Tue, 17 Jun 2008 05:50:44 +0000</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Masimba Biriwasha</dc:creator>
    
		<category><![CDATA[In Global]]></category>

    <guid isPermaLink="false">http://ecoworldly.com/2008/06/17/should-poor-developing-countries-give-a-hoot-about-going-green/</guid>
    <description><![CDATA[<p><span style="font-size: 10pt;font-family: Tahoma"><span style="font-size: 10pt;font-family: Tahoma"><span style="font-size: 10pt;font-family: Tahoma"><a href="None"></a></span></span><a href="None"><img class="alignleft alignnone size-full wp-image-1148" style="float: left" src="http://go635254.s3.amazonaws.com/ecoworldly/files/2008/06/ugandaed1.jpg" alt="" width="275" height="189" /></a>Understandably, developing countries face unique challenges in addressing concerns related to the environment. Apart from the environment, poor developing countries have more pressing and immediate problems that oftentimes present themselves so forcefully that politicians are forced to make too many compromises, particulalrly on environmental issues.</span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0cm 0cm 0pt"><span style="font-size: 10pt;font-family: Tahoma">But simply ignoring &#8220;going green&#8221; will indeed destroy the base of natural resources that developing countries need for sustainable economic, social, and political prosperity.</span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0cm 0cm 0pt"><span style="font-size: 10pt;font-family: Tahoma"> </span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0cm 0cm 0pt"><span style="font-size: 10pt;font-family: Tahoma">&#8220;For most, emission reduction is not a viable option in the near term. With income levels far below those of developed countries and per capita emissions on average just one-sixth those of the industrialized world developing countries will continue to increase their emissions as they strive for economic growth and a better quality of life,&#8221; says Eileen Claussen, President of <a title="Pew Climate" href="www.pewclimate.org">Pew Center on Global Climate Change</a>. </span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0cm 0cm 0pt"><span style="font-size: 10pt;font-family: Tahoma">
<p><a href="http://ecoworldly.com/2008/06/17/should-poor-developing-countries-give-a-hoot-about-going-green/" class="more-link">Read more of this story &#187;</a></p>
]]></description>
    <wfw:commentRss>http://ecoworldly.com/2008/06/17/should-poor-developing-countries-give-a-hoot-about-going-green/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>Will New Indiana Jones Movie Be Good for Peru? Probably Not</title>
    <link>http://ecoworldly.com/2008/05/18/will-new-indiana-jones-movie-be-good-for-peru-probably-not/</link>
    <comments>http://ecoworldly.com/2008/05/18/will-new-indiana-jones-movie-be-good-for-peru-probably-not/#comments</comments>
    <pubDate>Sun, 18 May 2008 04:00:48 +0000</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Levi Novey</dc:creator>
    
    <guid isPermaLink="false">http://ecoworldly.com/2008/05/18/will-new-indiana-jones-movie-be-good-for-peru-probably-not/</guid>
    <description><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://go635254.s3.amazonaws.com/ecoworldly/files/2008/05/indiana-jones3.jpg" alt="A Still from Indiana Jones and the Kingdom of the Crystal Skull" align="top" /></p>
<p>Set for its world premiere today at the Cannes Film Festival, and then its wide release on Thursday, <a href="http://www.indianajones.com"><em>Indiana Jones and the Kingdom of the Crystal Skull</em></a> will feature Peru prominently in its story. One <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bVNDheb_6X0">preview</a> for the movie shows a plane flying over<a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nazca_Lines"> the Nazca Lines</a> and according to <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UsGaB52hfjc">another</a> the characters will also take their quest to find the Crystal Skull into Peru&#8217;s jungles. Looking back at the past Indiana Jones movies, Peruvians should hold their breath before cheering the arrival of Indiana Jones in theaters.
<p><a href="http://ecoworldly.com/2008/05/18/will-new-indiana-jones-movie-be-good-for-peru-probably-not/" class="more-link">Read more of this story &#187;</a></p>
]]></description>
    <wfw:commentRss>http://ecoworldly.com/2008/05/18/will-new-indiana-jones-movie-be-good-for-peru-probably-not/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>Red, Green &#38; Blue: Eco-Tourism or &#8220;Green&#8221; Colonialism?</title>
    <link>http://shirleysilukgregory.greenoptions.com/2007/07/17/red-green-blue-eco-tourism-or-green-colonialism/</link>
    <comments>http://shirleysilukgregory.greenoptions.com/2007/07/17/red-green-blue-eco-tourism-or-green-colonialism/#comments</comments>
    <pubDate>Tue, 17 Jul 2007 12:53:21 +0000</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Shirley Siluk Gregory</dc:creator>
    
    <guid isPermaLink="false">http://shirleysilukgregory.greenoptions.com/2007/07/17/red-green-blue-eco-tourism-or-green-colonialism/</guid>
    <description><![CDATA[<div>
<div>
<img src="/files/images/Scarlet+Macaw_0.jpg" width="150" height="210" alt="Scarlet Macaw in Belize" />You know, just 10 years ago, few vacations sounded as thrilling to me as an &#34;eco-vacation.&#34; Maybe two weeks in a rustic part of Costa Rica on the lookout for wild scarlet, green-wing and blue-and-gold macaws squawking in the trees, flocking to claylicks or just soaring through the warm, moist tropical air from one spot to another. Or, though I&#8217;m not the cold-weather-type, cruising along the Alaskan coast to drink in the astounding, other-worldly beauty of natural blue ice 10 stories high, majestic snow-capped peaks and, possibly, even the rare thrill of spotting a polar bear doing its thing in the wild.
</div>
<div>
 
</div>
<div>
</div>
<div>
</div>
<div>
</div>
<div>
</div>
<div>
But now, a decade later, I&#8217;m far more conflicted. Yes, eco-tourism has helped lift many marginal or struggling indigenous communities out of poverty or <a href="http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=11919910">hopelessness.</a> Even in parts of the developed world, such as the Florida coast where I live, tourism brings a bounty of dollars and, as a result, a more-vibrant, liveable community for the locals as well. But a travel-based economy is a double-edged sword.
</div>
<div>
 
</div>
<div>
</div>
<div>
</div>
<div>
</div>
<div>
</div>
<div>
Even beyond the negative echoes of colonialism and <a href="http://news.independent.co.uk/world/americas/article2766040.ece">cultural arrogance</a> some types of travel might conjure up, there&#8217;s a far darker aspect to eco-tourism today: the possibility that sincere, well-meaning travelers who seek only to benefit a fragile environment or a developing community are actually causing, in the long term, more harm than good. Primate groups managed so as to be viewed more conveniently &#34;in the wild&#34; are <a href="http://www.buffalo.edu/news/8752">stressed</a> to the point of infanticide, while the very notion of <a href="http://www.commondreams.org/archive/2007/05/03/939/">&#34;global-warming-based tours&#34;</a> seems nothing less than perverse. Plus, the whole notion of offsetting the carbon emissions damage of your vacation has, I think, been fairly effectively discredited: there&#8217;s no free lunch and there&#8217;s no carbon-free globe-trotting either.
</div>
<div>
 
</div>
<div>
</div>
<div>
</div>
<div>
</div>
<div>
</div>
<div>
So what&#8217;s the answer? I&#8217;m not sure. Few experiences are more illuminating than a <a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/07/13/AR2007071300537.html?sub=AR">first-person glimpse</a> into an exotic, even threatened, locale, and such encounters can go a long way toward encouraging those with means to help make meaningful changes for those without. But the thought of cruise ship after cruise ship anchoring off the coast of Greenland to let travelers watch ice sheets melt is, to me, abhorrent. Rather than taking a strong stance here, I&#8217;m more interested in hearing how others view this environmental Hydra facing the world&#8217;s most privileged.
</div>
<div>
 
</div>
<div>
</div>
<div>
What&#8217;s your take?
</div>
<div>
<!--break--> 
</div>
</div>
]]></description>
    <wfw:commentRss>http://shirleysilukgregory.greenoptions.com/2007/07/17/red-green-blue-eco-tourism-or-green-colonialism/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
  </item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- 352 queries in 0.840 seconds. -->