<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
  xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
  xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
  >

<channel>
  <title>Green Options &#187; donald trump</title>
  <link>http://greenoptions.com/tag/donald-trump</link>
  <description>Posts tagged 'donald trump'</description>
  <pubDate>Fri, 15 May 2009 16:36:02 +0000</pubDate>
  <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
  <language>en</language>
  <item>
    <title>Environmental Protest Round Up: 15 May 2009</title>
    <link>http://redgreenandblue.org/2009/05/15/environmental-protest-round-up-15-may-2009/</link>
    <comments>http://redgreenandblue.org/2009/05/15/environmental-protest-round-up-15-may-2009/#comments</comments>
    <pubDate>Fri, 15 May 2009 16:36:02 +0000</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Kay Sexton</dc:creator>
    
		<category><![CDATA[Center]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Natural Resources]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Other Politics]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Policy]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[World]]></category>

    <guid isPermaLink="false">http://redgreenandblue.org/2009/05/15/environmental-protest-round-up-15-may-2009/</guid>
    <description><![CDATA[<p><a href="None"><img class="alignnone size-full wp-image-3143" src="http://go635254.s3.amazonaws.com/redgreenandblue/files/2009/05/montreal.jpg" alt="montreal panorama" width="500" height="241" /></a></p>
<p>What makes a protest worthwhile? Does it have to change policy, or achieve the reversal of a specific decision? Recent protests in the environmental arena seem to have educative as well as practical purposes. 
<p><a href="http://redgreenandblue.org/2009/05/15/environmental-protest-round-up-15-may-2009/" class="more-link">Read more of this story &#187;</a></p>
]]></description>
    <wfw:commentRss>http://redgreenandblue.org/2009/05/15/environmental-protest-round-up-15-may-2009/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>Scotland Permits Donald Trump to Build Resort on Protected Land</title>
    <link>http://planetsave.com/blog/2008/11/04/scotland-permits-donald-trump-to-build-resort-on-protected-land/</link>
    <comments>http://planetsave.com/blog/2008/11/04/scotland-permits-donald-trump-to-build-resort-on-protected-land/#comments</comments>
    <pubDate>Tue, 04 Nov 2008 02:06:20 +0000</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Alex Felsinger</dc:creator>
    
		<category><![CDATA[Anti-Environmentalism]]></category>

    <guid isPermaLink="false">http://planetsave.com/blog/2008/11/04/scotland-permits-donald-trump-to-build-resort-on-protected-land/</guid>
    <description><![CDATA[<p><strong>Despite pleas from environmentalists and wildlife groups,<a href="http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/uk/scotland/article5074841.ece" target="_blank"> the Scottish government has approved Donald Trump’s plans for a $1.5 billion golf resort along the Aberdeenshire coastline</a>, an area previously designated as a ‘Site of Special Scientific Interest.’</strong></p>
<p><a href="http://planetsave.com/files/2008/11/aberdeenshire.jpg"><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-3235" src="http://go635254.s3.amazonaws.com/planetsave/files/2008/11/aberdeenshire.jpg" alt="" width="500" height="333" /></a></p>
<p>The government defends the decision by pointing to the hundreds of jobs the 2,000-acre facility will create amid a damaged economy. The facility is expected to generate $100 million annually for the Aberdeenshire community.</p>
<p>The government has essentially given Trump free reign to do what he’d like with the land with little-to-no environmental supervision. Wildlife groups had hoped to form a compromise, but instead, Trump’s development will not be required take the wildlife habitat into account whatsoever.</p>
<p><a href="http://planetsave.com/blog/2008/11/04/scotland-permits-donald-trump-to-build-resort-on-protected-land/" class="more-link">Read more of this story &#187;</a></p>
]]></description>
    <wfw:commentRss>http://planetsave.com/blog/2008/11/04/scotland-permits-donald-trump-to-build-resort-on-protected-land/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
  </item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- 126 queries in 0.348 seconds. -->