<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
  xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
  xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
  >

<channel>
  <title>Green Options &#187; E10</title>
  <link>http://greenoptions.com/tag/e10</link>
  <description>Posts tagged 'E10'</description>
  <pubDate>Wed, 23 Jul 2008 14:39:19 +0000</pubDate>
  <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
  <language>en</language>
  <item>
    <title>Samsung to Invest $1.63 Billion in Indonesian Biodiesel Project</title>
    <link>http://gas2.org/2008/07/23/samsung-to-invest-163-billion-in-indonesian-biodiesel-project/</link>
    <comments>http://gas2.org/2008/07/23/samsung-to-invest-163-billion-in-indonesian-biodiesel-project/#comments</comments>
    <pubDate>Wed, 23 Jul 2008 14:39:19 +0000</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Nick Chambers</dc:creator>
    
		<category><![CDATA[Biodiesel]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Carbon Emissions]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Ethanol]]></category>

    <guid isPermaLink="false">http://gas2.org/2008/07/23/samsung-to-invest-163-billion-in-indonesian-biodiesel-project/</guid>
    <description><![CDATA[<p><img class="alignnone size-full wp-image-718" style="vertical-align: top" src="http://go635254.s3.amazonaws.com/gas2/files/2008/07/palm_oil.jpg" alt="Oil Palm Plantation" width="500" height="262" /></p>
<p>According to an <a title="Jakarta Post article on Samsung palm oil investment " href="http://old.thejakartapost.com/detailbusiness.asp?fileid=20080722.L02&#38;irec=1" target="_blank">article in the Jakarta Post</a>, an official from the <a title="Wikipedia entry for Politics of Indonesia" href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Politics_of_Indonesia" target="_blank">Indonesian government</a> has spilled the beans on Samsung&#8217;s plans to invest up to $1.63 billion dollars in what&#8217;s sure to be a controversial acquisition of land for growing oil palms and construction of a <a title="Biodiesel Mythbuster" href="http://gas2.org/2008/04/10/biodiesel-mythbuster-20-twenty-two-biodiesel-myths-dispelled/" target="_blank">biodiesel</a> plant in Indonesia.</p>
<p><a href="http://gas2.org/2008/07/23/samsung-to-invest-163-billion-in-indonesian-biodiesel-project/" class="more-link">Read more of this story &#187;</a></p>
]]></description>
    <wfw:commentRss>http://gas2.org/2008/07/23/samsung-to-invest-163-billion-in-indonesian-biodiesel-project/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>Opinion: Biofuels, Food Prices and Global Warming Roundup</title>
    <link>http://gas2.org/2008/07/17/opinion-biofuels-food-prices-and-global-warming-roundup/</link>
    <comments>http://gas2.org/2008/07/17/opinion-biofuels-food-prices-and-global-warming-roundup/#comments</comments>
    <pubDate>Thu, 17 Jul 2008 15:58:50 +0000</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Nick Chambers</dc:creator>
    
		<category><![CDATA[Carbon Emissions]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Food vs. fuel]]></category>

    <guid isPermaLink="false">http://gas2.org/2008/07/17/opinion-biofuels-food-prices-and-global-warming-roundup/</guid>
    <description><![CDATA[<h3>The current rate at which biofuels are falling out of favor is largely founded on biased ideologies, which have been shaped by widespread political and corporate agenda-pushing from all sides of the fence.<img class="alignnone size-full wp-image-700" style="vertical-align: text-top" src="http://go635254.s3.amazonaws.com/gas2/files/2008/07/biofuel_food_mashup.jpg" alt="Biofuels food and climate change" width="500" height="183" /></h3>
<p>But first, a digression.</p>
<p><strong>Part 1: When an egg was just an egg<br />
</strong></p>
<p>I remember a time when an egg was just an egg. Nobody argued about that. It was a blissful time. Yet, for all its strengths, it was a fragile time held together by unsupported conclusions and limited knowledge.</p>
<p><a href="http://gas2.org/2008/07/17/opinion-biofuels-food-prices-and-global-warming-roundup/" class="more-link">Read more of this story &#187;</a></p>
]]></description>
    <wfw:commentRss>http://gas2.org/2008/07/17/opinion-biofuels-food-prices-and-global-warming-roundup/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>Study: Your Car Can Run On 20% Ethanol</title>
    <link>http://gas2.org/2008/03/06/study-your-car-can-run-on-20-ethanol/</link>
    <comments>http://gas2.org/2008/03/06/study-your-car-can-run-on-20-ethanol/#comments</comments>
    <pubDate>Thu, 06 Mar 2008 21:21:16 +0000</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Clayton B. Cornell</dc:creator>
    
		<category><![CDATA[Ethanol]]></category>

    <guid isPermaLink="false">http://gas2.org/2008/03/06/study-your-car-can-run-on-20-ethanol/</guid>
    <description><![CDATA[<h3><img src="http://go635254.s3.amazonaws.com/gas2/files/2008/03/biofuelpump.jpg" alt="biofuel pump" align="left" />A University of Minnesota study found that using higher blends of ethanol (20%) blended into gasoline did not cause damage or cause performance problems when used in standard gasoline engines.</h3>
<p>Over half the gasoline sold in the US is already blended with 10% ethanol (E10), but higher blends were thought to run the risk of causing engine damage. Higher blends of ethanol, up to 85% (E85), will only work properly in engines converted to accept the fuel.</p>
<blockquote><p>Using 40 pairs of vehicles commonly found on American roads, a year-long research effort found that increasing ethanol blends from 10 percent (E10) to 20 percent (E20) in a gallon of gasoline provided an effective fuel across a range of tests focusing on driveability and materials compatibility.</p>
<p><a href="http://gas2.org/2008/03/06/study-your-car-can-run-on-20-ethanol/" class="more-link">Read more of this story &#187;</a></p>
]]></description>
    <wfw:commentRss>http://gas2.org/2008/03/06/study-your-car-can-run-on-20-ethanol/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
  </item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- 159 queries in 0.443 seconds. -->