<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
  xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
  xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
  >

<channel>
  <title>Green Options &#187; economic poulism</title>
  <link>http://greenoptions.com/tag/economic-poulism</link>
  <description>Posts tagged 'economic poulism'</description>
  <pubDate>Thu, 30 Oct 2008 08:09:02 +0000</pubDate>
  <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
  <language>en</language>
  <item>
    <title>What Does Economic Populism Mean For The Green Economy?</title>
    <link>http://inspiredeconomist.com/2008/10/30/what-does-economic-populism-mean-for-the-green-economy/</link>
    <comments>http://inspiredeconomist.com/2008/10/30/what-does-economic-populism-mean-for-the-green-economy/#comments</comments>
    <pubDate>Thu, 30 Oct 2008 08:09:02 +0000</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Reenita Malhotra</dc:creator>
    
		<category><![CDATA[Opinion]]></category>

    <guid isPermaLink="false">http://inspiredeconomist.com/2008/10/30/what-does-economic-populism-mean-for-the-green-economy/</guid>
    <description><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://inspiredeconomist.com/files/2008/10/warren.jpg"></a></p>
<h3><img class="reflect" src="http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3030/2841297240_0cc4e2209d.jpg?v=0" alt="warren_buffet_when_the_tides_run_out by One Trick Pony in FlickR." width="212" height="382" />Economic Populism appears to be back in vogue. Given the<a href="http://inspiredeconomist.com/2008/10/15/economy-in-recession-the-cost-of-allowing-lehman-brothers-to-fail/" target="_blank"> fall of Lehman Brothers</a> and the Wall Street machine, the economic banter clearly seems to be &#8220;the people&#8221; versus &#8220;the <a title="Elite" href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Elite">elites</a>.</h3>
<h3></h3>
<p>Economic populism involves an economic philosophy urging social and political system changes. In the current political and economic climate, the public concern over the inequity of wealth appears to be at a peak. There is a growing call by Senator <a title="Socialism vs. Capitalism" href="http://inspiredeconomist.com/2008/10/22/election-coundown-socialism-vs-capitalism/" target="_blank">Barack Obama</a> and democrats to raise taxes on the wealthy to shrink the wealth gap. But is it true that the rich are getting richer? Or are the rich actually in danger of losing a significant portion of the nation&#8217;s wealth? Are the democrats worried about a problem that’s already being fixed by the markets?</p>
<p><strong>Emmanuel Saez</strong>, the income-share expert and economics professor at the <strong>University of California, Berkeley</strong> told <strong>Robert Frank of the Wall Street Journa</strong>l that during the Great Depression, the income and wealth of the top 1% of society fell drastically. (<a href="http://blogs.wsj.com/wealth/2008/10/22/why-the-rich-are-losing-their-share-of-wealth/?mod=loomia&#38;loomia_si=t0:a16:g4:r1:c0:b0" target="_blank">Read here for the full story)</a>. If history is to be believed then this will happen again especially if Obama becomes president.
<p><a href="http://inspiredeconomist.com/2008/10/30/what-does-economic-populism-mean-for-the-green-economy/" class="more-link">Read more of this story &#187;</a></p>
]]></description>
    <wfw:commentRss>http://inspiredeconomist.com/2008/10/30/what-does-economic-populism-mean-for-the-green-economy/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
  </item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- 91 queries in 0.327 seconds. -->