<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
  xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
  xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
  >

<channel>
  <title>Green Options &#187; emissions reduction</title>
  <link>http://greenoptions.com/tag/emissions-reduction</link>
  <description>Posts tagged 'emissions reduction'</description>
  <pubDate>Wed, 25 Mar 2009 22:01:44 +0000</pubDate>
  <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
  <language>en</language>
  <item>
    <title>China&#8217;s Emissions Trading Plan Puts Weight on Countries&#8217; Cumulative GHG</title>
    <link>http://sustainablog.org/2009/03/25/chinas-emissions-trading-plan-puts-weight-on-countries-cumulative-ghg/</link>
    <comments>http://sustainablog.org/2009/03/25/chinas-emissions-trading-plan-puts-weight-on-countries-cumulative-ghg/#comments</comments>
    <pubDate>Wed, 25 Mar 2009 22:01:44 +0000</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Elizabeth Balkan</dc:creator>
    
		<category><![CDATA[Climate change]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Environmental &amp; Climate Science]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Environmental Policies]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[International]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>

    <guid isPermaLink="false">http://sustainablog.org/2009/03/25/chinas-emissions-trading-plan-puts-weight-on-countries-cumulative-ghg/</guid>
    <description><![CDATA[<h3><a href="http://sustainablog.org/files/2009/03/chinaearth.jpg"><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-4331" src="http://go635254.s3.amazonaws.com/sustainablog/files/2009/03/chinaearth.jpg" alt="" /></a><a href="http://sustainablog.org/files/2009/03/chinaearth4.jpg"><img class="alignleft size-medium wp-image-4335" src="http://go635254.s3.amazonaws.com/sustainablog/files/2009/03/chinaearth4.jpg" alt="" width="202" height="148" /></a>China appears to be backing out of global efforts to address climate change, intensifying pre-<a href="http://unfccc.int/2860.php">Copenhagen</a> debate.</h3>
<p>A top China central government think tank yesterday released a <a href="http://www.reuters.com/article/environmentNews/idUSTRE52O1IZ20090325?sp=true">framework for quantifying countries&#8217; historical emissions</a>. Under this proposed framework, the <a href="http://www.drc.gov.cn/english/">State Council Development Research Center</a> (DRC) would create a &#8220;historic account&#8221; of past emissions, used to benchmark developing countries with lower accumulated emissions - like China - against countries with higher accumulated emissions and assign emissions &#8220;deficits&#8221; to countries who have emitted less. Using this quantitative assessment, countries with emissions &#8220;deficits&#8221; would get the green light to emit, or trade emissions credits with countries that have already exceeded their allowance.</p>
<p>The release of this plan supports external analysis that China believes it should have the right to develop free from carbon reductions until their accumulated emissions are on par with industrialized countries. A recent <a href="www.brookings.edu/reports/2009/01_climate_change_lieberthal_sandalow.aspx">Brookings Institute report: &#8220;Overcoming Obstacles to US-China Cooperation on Climate Change&#8221;</a> articulated Beijing&#8217;s stance, which included the conviction that:</p>
<blockquote><p>Countries should be held responsible not only for their current emissions but also for their cumulative historical emissions, given that greenhouse gases accumulate in the atmosphere over many decades.</p></blockquote>
<p>This plan is Beijing&#8217;s most comprehensive effort to date to both highlight and quantify development inequalities as a justification for releasing China and other developing countries from emissions reduction expectations.</p>
<p><a href="http://sustainablog.org/2009/03/25/chinas-emissions-trading-plan-puts-weight-on-countries-cumulative-ghg/" class="more-link">Read more of this story &#187;</a></p>
]]></description>
    <wfw:commentRss>http://sustainablog.org/2009/03/25/chinas-emissions-trading-plan-puts-weight-on-countries-cumulative-ghg/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>Bush Climate Speech - World Reactions</title>
    <link>http://ecoworldly.com/2008/04/21/bush-climate-speech-world-reactions/</link>
    <comments>http://ecoworldly.com/2008/04/21/bush-climate-speech-world-reactions/#comments</comments>
    <pubDate>Mon, 21 Apr 2008 05:00:33 +0000</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Mark Seall</dc:creator>
    
		<category><![CDATA[In Global]]></category>

    <guid isPermaLink="false">http://ecoworldly.com/2008/04/21/bush-climate-speech-world-reactions/</guid>
    <description><![CDATA[<p><img height="217" alt="" src="http://farm1.static.flickr.com/154/435955203_5d2bed9a2d.jpg?v=0" width="263" align="left">With much fanfare, President George Bush gave a <a href="http://www.whitehouse.gov/news/releases/2008/04/20080416-6.html">recent speech</a> announcing new commitments by the United States towards the prevention of climate change. </p>
<p>The speech was <a href="http://greenoptions.com/tag/bush">widely covered here</a> on Green Options and in the general media, with many feeling that this was a case of <a href="http://www.telegraph.co.uk/earth/main.jhtml?xml=/earth/2008/04/16/eabush116.xml">too little, too late</a>. </p>
<p>Of course, this was not particularly surprising, and few people were gearing themselves up for the potential announcement of a dramatic change in policy. But what has been interesting is the unprecedented criticism from world leaders disappointed with the lack of US commitment:</p>
<p><a href="http://ecoworldly.com/2008/04/21/bush-climate-speech-world-reactions/" class="more-link">Read more of this story &#187;</a></p>
]]></description>
    <wfw:commentRss>http://ecoworldly.com/2008/04/21/bush-climate-speech-world-reactions/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
  </item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- 130 queries in 0.644 seconds. -->