<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
  xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
  xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
  >

<channel>
  <title>Green Options &#187; emissions reductions</title>
  <link>http://greenoptions.com/tag/emissions-reductions</link>
  <description>Posts tagged 'emissions reductions'</description>
  <pubDate>Thu, 02 Jul 2009 21:46:28 +0000</pubDate>
  <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
  <language>en</language>
  <item>
    <title>EPA Proposes New Stringent Standards For Large Ships</title>
    <link>http://planetsave.com/blog/2009/07/02/epa-proposes-new-stringent-standards-for-large-ships/</link>
    <comments>http://planetsave.com/blog/2009/07/02/epa-proposes-new-stringent-standards-for-large-ships/#comments</comments>
    <pubDate>Thu, 02 Jul 2009 21:46:28 +0000</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Ruedigar Matthes</dc:creator>
    
		<category><![CDATA[Energy &amp; Fuel]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Health]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Transport]]></category>

    <guid isPermaLink="false">http://planetsave.com/blog/2009/07/02/epa-proposes-new-stringent-standards-for-large-ships/</guid>
    <description><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://planetsave.com/files/2009/07/ship.jpg"><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-4590" src="http://go635254.s3.amazonaws.com/planetsave/files/2009/07/ship.jpg" alt="" width="500" height="375" /></a></p>
<p><strong>In order to cut harmful emissions from maritime vessels, the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) announced the next steps of its coordinated effort on Wednesday. The steps include </strong><a href="http://www.epa.gov/otaq/oceanvessels.htm#regs-nprm" target="_blank"><strong>creating a rule under the Clean Air Act</strong></a><strong> that would establish tough engine and fuel standards for U.S. flagged ships. The proposed rule would harmonize with international standards and lead to improved air quality throughout the country.</strong></p>
<p>The new proposal follows a proposal made between the United States and Canada in March that would set aside thousands of miles of coast between the two countries as an Emission Control Area (ECA). The International Maritime Organization (IMO), a United Nations agency, will begin review of the ECA plan this month. The passage of the ECA plan would result in the enforcement of stringent standards placed on large ships that operate within 200 nautical miles of U.S. or Canadian coasts.</p>
<p><a href="http://planetsave.com/blog/2009/07/02/epa-proposes-new-stringent-standards-for-large-ships/" class="more-link">Read more of this story &#187;</a></p>
]]></description>
    <wfw:commentRss>http://planetsave.com/blog/2009/07/02/epa-proposes-new-stringent-standards-for-large-ships/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>EU Agrees a Deadline For Climate Action</title>
    <link>http://ecoworldly.com/2008/03/17/eu-agrees-a-deadline-for-climate-action/</link>
    <comments>http://ecoworldly.com/2008/03/17/eu-agrees-a-deadline-for-climate-action/#comments</comments>
    <pubDate>Mon, 17 Mar 2008 08:00:38 +0000</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Mark Seall</dc:creator>
    
		<category><![CDATA[In Europe]]></category>

    <guid isPermaLink="false">http://ecoworldly.com/2008/03/17/eu-agrees-a-deadline-for-climate-action/</guid>
    <description><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://go635254.s3.amazonaws.com/ecoworldly/files/2008/03/istock-000003864115xsmall-cropped-thumb.jpg" alt="deadline for climate action" align="left" border="0" height="273" width="278" />The fight against climate change has moved on considerably in the past year. Today, the debate is less about <em><strong>if</strong></em>, and more about <em><strong>what</strong></em>.</p>
<p>But concrete action has been slow, and whilst the world continues to talk, emissions continue to rise. However, another small but significant step has been made during the past week with an agreement between EU leaders to commit to legislation setting firm targets for a 20% reduction in Co2 emissions before 2020.</p>
<p>Janez Jansa , Prime Minister of Solvenia who currently holds the rotating EU presidency told reporters that EU leaders have taken a &#8220;huge step forward&#8221; with this agreement.</p>
<p><a href="http://ecoworldly.com/2008/03/17/eu-agrees-a-deadline-for-climate-action/" class="more-link">Read more of this story &#187;</a></p>
]]></description>
    <wfw:commentRss>http://ecoworldly.com/2008/03/17/eu-agrees-a-deadline-for-climate-action/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>Princeton Eyes Carbon Cuts, Greener Future</title>
    <link>http://ecolocalizer.com/2008/02/25/princeton-eyes-carbon-cuts-greener-future/</link>
    <comments>http://ecolocalizer.com/2008/02/25/princeton-eyes-carbon-cuts-greener-future/#comments</comments>
    <pubDate>Mon, 25 Feb 2008 17:45:23 +0000</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Shirley Siluk Gregory</dc:creator>
    
		<category><![CDATA[New Jersey]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Princeton]]></category>

    <guid isPermaLink="false">http://ecolocalizer.com/2008/02/25/princeton-eyes-carbon-cuts-greener-future/</guid>
    <description><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://go635254.s3.amazonaws.com/ecolocalizer/files/2008/02/princeton-blair-arch.jpg" alt="The Blair Arch at Princeton University. (Photo courtesy of Wikimedia Commons user Geir Thorarinsson.)" />Princeton University&#8217;s new <a href="http://www.dailyprincetonian.com/2008/02/25/20236/">Sustainability Plan</a> calls for the campus to reduce its carbon emissions to 1990 levels by 2020.</p>
<p>Under the plan, all new construction at Princeton will have to use half as much energy as is required under current building codes. The plan also aims to reduce campus car traffic by 10 percent by 2020.</p>
<p>&#8220;We feel that we have an obligation as an institution to create an environment where students, faculty and staff can see the institution trying out new technologies &#8230; or trying to change behavior,” said Mark Burstein, Princeton&#8217;s executive vice president.</p>
<p><a href="http://ecolocalizer.com/2008/02/25/princeton-eyes-carbon-cuts-greener-future/" class="more-link">Read more of this story &#187;</a></p>
]]></description>
    <wfw:commentRss>http://ecolocalizer.com/2008/02/25/princeton-eyes-carbon-cuts-greener-future/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>50, 75 &#8230; Do I Hear 100 Percent Emissions Cuts?</title>
    <link>http://planetsave.com/blog/2008/02/15/50-75-do-i-hear-100-percent-emissions-cuts/</link>
    <comments>http://planetsave.com/blog/2008/02/15/50-75-do-i-hear-100-percent-emissions-cuts/#comments</comments>
    <pubDate>Fri, 15 Feb 2008 15:41:18 +0000</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Shirley Siluk Gregory</dc:creator>
    
		<category><![CDATA[Action &amp; Activism]]></category>

    <guid isPermaLink="false">http://planetsave.com/blog/2008/02/15/50-75-do-i-hear-100-percent-emissions-cuts/</guid>
    <description><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://go635254.s3.amazonaws.com/planetsave/files/2008/02/warming-temps-1900-2004.jpg" alt='A graph showing average temperatures from 1900 to 2004 (image courtesy of Wikimedia Commons user Hanno).' />Got some bad news for all those countries trying to hammer out a successor to the Kyoto Protocol: aiming for carbon dioxide emissions reductions of 25, 50, even 75 percent in the coming decades ain&#8217;t gonna cut it.</p>
<p>The <i>only</i> way to stabilize Earth&#8217;s climate, according to <a href="http://www.eurekalert.org/pub_releases/2008-02/ci-scr021408.php">new research,</a> is to cut carbon emissions to zero &#8230; and to do it quick.</p>
<p>Climate scientists Ken Caldeira and Damon Matthews reached that conclusion after taking a new approach to future climate modeling. Rather than analyze what it would take to stabilize carbon dioxide levels, they crunched data to determine how much carbon we could continue pumping into the air without warming the Earth any further.</p>
<p>The answer they got was: none.</p>
<p>&#8220;Most scientific and policy discussions about avoiding climate change have centered on what emissions would be needed to stabilize greenhouse gases in the atmosphere,&#8221; Caldeira said. &#8220;But stabilizing greenhouse gases does not equate to a stable climate.&#8221;</p>
<p>In Caldeira&#8217;s and Mathews&#8217; model, atmospheric carbon dioxide concentrations slowly begin dropping only if emissions go to zero. And, even in that case, the Earth remains warm for another 500 years.</p>
<p>On the flip side, <i>any</i> emissions more than zero result in further warming of the planet.</p>
<p>&#8220;What if we were to discover tomorrow that a climate catastrophe was imminent if our planet warmed any further?&#8221; Caldeira asked.</p>
<p>That might be a question we&#8217;ll have to answer soon. Amazingly, though, Caldeira remains hopeful.</p>
<p>&#8220;It is just not that hard to solve the technological challenges,&#8221; he said. &#8220;We can develop and deploy wind turbines, <a href="http://gas2.org/2008/04/23/affordable-electric-cars-coming-to-us-in-2009/">electric cars</a>, and so on, and live well without damaging the environment. The future can be better than the present, but we have to take steps to start kicking the CO2 habit now, so we won&#8217;t need to go cold turkey later.&#8221;</p>
]]></description>
    <wfw:commentRss>http://planetsave.com/blog/2008/02/15/50-75-do-i-hear-100-percent-emissions-cuts/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>Is The German Auto Industry Really Getting Greener?</title>
    <link>http://ecoworldly.com/2008/02/10/is-the-german-auto-industry-really-getting-greener/</link>
    <comments>http://ecoworldly.com/2008/02/10/is-the-german-auto-industry-really-getting-greener/#comments</comments>
    <pubDate>Sun, 10 Feb 2008 18:08:29 +0000</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Mark Seall</dc:creator>
    
		<category><![CDATA[In Europe]]></category>

    <guid isPermaLink="false">http://ecoworldly.com/2008/02/10/is-the-german-auto-industry-really-getting-greener/</guid>
    <description><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://ecoworldly.com/files/2008/02/istock-000002715949xsmall.jpg"><img src="http://go635254.s3.amazonaws.com/ecoworldly/files/2008/02/istock-000002715949xsmall-thumb.jpg" alt="iStock_000002715949XSmall" width="285" height="380" align="left" /></a> Germany prides itself on its auto industry, and with good reason. German cars have a world reputation for performance, style, reliability and solid engineering. Its also one of the few countries where high performance cars can be fully put to the test, with many sections of its autobahns being free of speed restrictions - its not unusual when driving at very high speeds in Germany to be overtaken by other cars travelling at very very very high speeds.</p>
<p>So it was of little surprise that the German auto industry, represented by brands such as Mercedes, BMW, Porsche and Volkswagen Audi vigorously lobbied its government for concessions on new European fuel economy standards (see box text below). Manufacturers were chiefly concerned with loosing their dominance of the luxury car segment through being forced to manufacture smaller, more efficient cars.</p>
<p><strong>&#8220;We don&#8217;t want Germany to became a nation of small car owners&#8221;</strong></p>
<p>President of the German automotive industry association, Matthias Wissmann, told a news conference recently &#8220;We don&#8217;t want Germany to became a nation of small car owners&#8221;. The German government has backed its automakers, claiming that the EU proposals place an unfair burden on German industry in comparison to the French and Italians.</p>
<p><a href="http://ecoworldly.com/2008/02/10/is-the-german-auto-industry-really-getting-greener/" class="more-link">Read more of this story &#187;</a></p>
]]></description>
    <wfw:commentRss>http://ecoworldly.com/2008/02/10/is-the-german-auto-industry-really-getting-greener/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
  </item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- 222 queries in 0.479 seconds. -->