<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
  xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
  xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
  >

<channel>
  <title>Green Options &#187; emissions standards</title>
  <link>http://greenoptions.com/tag/emissions-standards</link>
  <description>Posts tagged 'emissions standards'</description>
  <pubDate>Thu, 02 Jul 2009 21:46:28 +0000</pubDate>
  <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
  <language>en</language>
  <item>
    <title>EPA Proposes New Stringent Standards For Large Ships</title>
    <link>http://planetsave.com/blog/2009/07/02/epa-proposes-new-stringent-standards-for-large-ships/</link>
    <comments>http://planetsave.com/blog/2009/07/02/epa-proposes-new-stringent-standards-for-large-ships/#comments</comments>
    <pubDate>Thu, 02 Jul 2009 21:46:28 +0000</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Ruedigar Matthes</dc:creator>
    
		<category><![CDATA[Energy &amp; Fuel]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Health]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Transport]]></category>

    <guid isPermaLink="false">http://planetsave.com/blog/2009/07/02/epa-proposes-new-stringent-standards-for-large-ships/</guid>
    <description><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://planetsave.com/files/2009/07/ship.jpg"><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-4590" src="http://go635254.s3.amazonaws.com/planetsave/files/2009/07/ship.jpg" alt="" width="500" height="375" /></a></p>
<p><strong>In order to cut harmful emissions from maritime vessels, the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) announced the next steps of its coordinated effort on Wednesday. The steps include </strong><a href="http://www.epa.gov/otaq/oceanvessels.htm#regs-nprm" target="_blank"><strong>creating a rule under the Clean Air Act</strong></a><strong> that would establish tough engine and fuel standards for U.S. flagged ships. The proposed rule would harmonize with international standards and lead to improved air quality throughout the country.</strong></p>
<p>The new proposal follows a proposal made between the United States and Canada in March that would set aside thousands of miles of coast between the two countries as an Emission Control Area (ECA). The International Maritime Organization (IMO), a United Nations agency, will begin review of the ECA plan this month. The passage of the ECA plan would result in the enforcement of stringent standards placed on large ships that operate within 200 nautical miles of U.S. or Canadian coasts.</p>
<p><a href="http://planetsave.com/blog/2009/07/02/epa-proposes-new-stringent-standards-for-large-ships/" class="more-link">Read more of this story &#187;</a></p>
]]></description>
    <wfw:commentRss>http://planetsave.com/blog/2009/07/02/epa-proposes-new-stringent-standards-for-large-ships/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>UK Activists Pay Drivers to Petition for Emissions Standards</title>
    <link>http://planetsave.com/blog/2008/11/07/uk-activists-pay-drivers-to-petition-for-emissions-standards/</link>
    <comments>http://planetsave.com/blog/2008/11/07/uk-activists-pay-drivers-to-petition-for-emissions-standards/#comments</comments>
    <pubDate>Fri, 07 Nov 2008 01:45:37 +0000</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Alex Felsinger</dc:creator>
    
		<category><![CDATA[Action &amp; Activism]]></category>

    <guid isPermaLink="false">http://planetsave.com/blog/2008/11/07/uk-activists-pay-drivers-to-petition-for-emissions-standards/</guid>
    <description><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://planetsave.com/files/2008/11/fivers.jpg"><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-3250" src="http://go635254.s3.amazonaws.com/planetsave/files/2008/11/fivers.jpg" alt="" width="500" height="261" /></a></p>
<p><strong>British environmental group <a href="http://www.wearefutureproof.org.uk/" target="_blank">Futureproof has been giving out £5 bills to drivers who agree to sign a petition</a> to the British Secretary of Transport, Geoff Hoon, to encourage him to seek tougher emission standards for cars sold in the European Union.</strong></p>
<p>“Today we&#8217;re giving drivers £5 each and in return asking them to make sure the Government plays its part in keeping the car manufacturers on track towards real progress and not opting for weaker targets,” <a href="http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/newstopics/politics/3388143/Five-pound-notes-to-be-given-to-drivers-by-campaigners.html" target="_blank">said Blake Ludwig</a>, the Managing Director for Futureproof.</p>
<p><a href="http://planetsave.com/blog/2008/11/07/uk-activists-pay-drivers-to-petition-for-emissions-standards/" class="more-link">Read more of this story &#187;</a></p>
]]></description>
    <wfw:commentRss>http://planetsave.com/blog/2008/11/07/uk-activists-pay-drivers-to-petition-for-emissions-standards/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>Automakers Lose Vermont Greenhouse Gas Standards Case</title>
    <link>http://planetsave.com/blog/2008/02/18/automakers-lose-vermont-greenhouse-gas-standards-case/</link>
    <comments>http://planetsave.com/blog/2008/02/18/automakers-lose-vermont-greenhouse-gas-standards-case/#comments</comments>
    <pubDate>Mon, 18 Feb 2008 15:11:05 +0000</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Max Lindberg</dc:creator>
    
		<category><![CDATA[Action &amp; Activism]]></category>

    <guid isPermaLink="false">http://planetsave.com/blog/2008/02/18/automakers-lose-vermont-greenhouse-gas-standards-case/</guid>
    <description><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://planetsave.com/files/2008/02/la-smog.jpg" title="la-smog.jpg"><img src="http://go635254.s3.amazonaws.com/planetsave/files/2008/02/la-smog.jpg" alt="la-smog.jpg" align="left" /></a>They tried, but Chief Judge of the US District court in Vermont, William K Sessions III ruled against the auto industry&#8217;s attempt to block states, including Vermont,  from adopting more rigorous  greenhouse gas emission standards for new light-duty vehicles.</p>
<p>In his ruling, Judge Sessions said the industry failed to prove that the state standards were unattainable, that they usurp the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration&#8217;s (NHTSA) prerogative to set fuel economy standards, and were preempted by federal authority.</p>
<p>The ruling came on the heels of an effort by the federal government to block California, and other states, from requiring that new, more stringent emission standards go into effect in 2009 models.  The EPA blocked the California law in a contentious move that followed signing of the new energy bill in December of 2007.</p>
<p>I wrote about the action and urged all states involved that had followed California&#8217;s lead to file suit against the EPA to force their hand.  <a href="http://planetsave.com/blog/2007/12/20/open-challenge-to-california-and-all-state-governments/">You can read it here</a></p>
<p>California was the first to file suit, as outlined <a href="http://planetsave.com/blog/2008/01/03/california-suing-epa-for-blocking-car-emissions-rules/">here</a>.</p>
<p>California is awaiting resolution of their lawsuit in US District Federal Court in California.</p>
<p>This one is worth watching.</p>
<p>To read the case, it&#8217;s in PDF and you can access it at the <a href="http://www.vtd.uscourts.gov/Cases/05cv302.html">Vermont Federal Court</a> site.</p>
<p>(Case 2:05-CV-302 Green Mountain Chrysler-Plymouth-Dodge et al v. Crombie et al)</p>
]]></description>
    <wfw:commentRss>http://planetsave.com/blog/2008/02/18/automakers-lose-vermont-greenhouse-gas-standards-case/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
  </item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- 156 queries in 0.394 seconds. -->