<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
  xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
  xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
  >

<channel>
  <title>Green Options &#187; endangered species act</title>
  <link>http://greenoptions.com/tag/endangered-species-act</link>
  <description>Posts tagged 'endangered species act'</description>
  <pubDate>Thu, 04 Sep 2008 16:59:50 +0000</pubDate>
  <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
  <language>en</language>
  <item>
    <title>ZapRoot: Bush Neuters Endangered Species Act</title>
    <link>http://redgreenandblue.org/2008/09/04/zaproot-bush-neuters-endangered-species-act/</link>
    <comments>http://redgreenandblue.org/2008/09/04/zaproot-bush-neuters-endangered-species-act/#comments</comments>
    <pubDate>Thu, 04 Sep 2008 16:59:50 +0000</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Jeff McIntire-Strasburg</dc:creator>
    
		<category><![CDATA[Liberal]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Other Politics]]></category>

    <guid isPermaLink="false">http://redgreenandblue.org/2008/09/04/zaproot-bush-neuters-endangered-species-act/</guid>
    <description><![CDATA[<p>This story contains additional media. <a href="http://redgreenandblue.org/2008/09/04/zaproot-bush-neuters-endangered-species-act/">Click here to view the media</a>.</p>
<p>From our friends at <a href="http://zaproot.com/">ZapRoot</a>: The Endangered Species Act is in grave danger (as we&#8217;ve noted here at Red, Green and Blue). Turn your online searching green and charitable with GoodSearch. And, we bring to you all new Green Gadgets.</p>
<p><a href="http://redgreenandblue.org/2008/09/04/zaproot-bush-neuters-endangered-species-act/" class="more-link">Read more of this story &#187;</a></p>
]]></description>
    <wfw:commentRss>http://redgreenandblue.org/2008/09/04/zaproot-bush-neuters-endangered-species-act/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>Bush versus Everyone on Endangered Species Act</title>
    <link>http://redgreenandblue.org/2008/08/27/bush-versus-everyone-on-endangered-species-act/</link>
    <comments>http://redgreenandblue.org/2008/08/27/bush-versus-everyone-on-endangered-species-act/#comments</comments>
    <pubDate>Wed, 27 Aug 2008 17:20:16 +0000</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Joshua S Hill</dc:creator>
    
		<category><![CDATA[Liberal]]></category>

    <guid isPermaLink="false">http://redgreenandblue.org/2008/08/27/bush-versus-everyone-on-endangered-species-act/</guid>
    <description><![CDATA[</p>
<p><a href="http://redgreenandblue.org/files/2008/08/375162515-db03a6a894.jpg"><img style="margin: 0px 5px 5px 0px" height="160" alt="375162515_db03a6a894" src="http://redgreenandblue.org/files/2008/08/375162515-db03a6a894-thumb.jpg" width="240" align="left" border="0" /></a> In the wake of the <a href="http://redgreenandblue.org/2008/08/18/the-proposed-neutering-of-our-endangered-species-act/comment-page-1/" target="_blank">decision by the Bush administration</a> to try and neuter the Endangered Species Act, environmental groups across America have come out in opposition to the plans. The latest, the Ecological Society of America, has come out hitting hard. </p>
<p>&#34;The concept of independent scientific review has been in practice since the 18th century and is crucial to ensuring that ideas and proposed work are scientifically sound,&#34; said Alison Power, president of the Society and professor in the Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology at Cornell University. &#34;This overhaul of the Endangered Species Act would place the fate of rare species in the hands of government stakeholders who are not qualified to assess the environmental impacts of their activities.&#34;</p>
<p><a href="http://redgreenandblue.org/2008/08/27/bush-versus-everyone-on-endangered-species-act/" class="more-link">Read more of this story &#187;</a></p>
]]></description>
    <wfw:commentRss>http://redgreenandblue.org/2008/08/27/bush-versus-everyone-on-endangered-species-act/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>The Proposed Neutering of Our Endangered Species Act</title>
    <link>http://redgreenandblue.org/2008/08/18/the-proposed-neutering-of-our-endangered-species-act/</link>
    <comments>http://redgreenandblue.org/2008/08/18/the-proposed-neutering-of-our-endangered-species-act/#comments</comments>
    <pubDate>Mon, 18 Aug 2008 16:33:03 +0000</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Jerry James Stone</dc:creator>
    
		<category><![CDATA[Leader]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Legislation]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Liberal]]></category>

    <guid isPermaLink="false">http://redgreenandblue.org/2008/08/18/the-proposed-neutering-of-our-endangered-species-act/</guid>
    <description><![CDATA[<p><img class="alignleft" style="float: left;margin-left: 10px;margin-right: 10px" src="http://static.flickr.com/64/207836370_501760ba77.jpg" alt="" width="305" height="305" />On Monday, the Bush administration proposed a policy that threatens to weaken the Endangered Species Act (ESA) to the point of extinction. <a href="http://redgreenandblue.org/2008/04/01/bush-administration-seeks-endangered-species-protection-for-elusive-climate-skeptics/">This comes as no surprise</a>. Like the war in Iraq, removing the fetters of environmental protection has been <a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2008/03/22/AR2008032202204.html">an administrational goal since 2001</a>. Unlike the war in Iraq, this time Bush and his cronies could very well succeed.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.ewire.com/display.cfm/Wire_ID/4943">Targeting the ESA&#8217;s consultation process</a>, the policy changes boil down to this: <strong>only when a federal agency feels their intended actions could bring about harm must they consult an outside agency like the Fish and Wildlife Service</strong>. Currently,  all of these decisions are subject to an independent scientific review.</p>
<p>If the ambiguity of that policy makes you uncomfortable then please raise your hand because it scares the crap out of me.</p>
<p>First off, our current administration has been, if anything, consistent in its attempt to <a href="http://www.wiredprnews.com/2008/08/17/white-house-disregards-law_20080817595.html">sidestep environmental policy over the past seven years</a>. Consider this, Bush&#8217;s administration has only added about 60 species to the endangered species list. That is about 10-percent of what was listed under the Clinton administration, and only about 3-percent of what the Reagan administration listed. Even George Bush&#8217;s dad added around 200 species to the list!</p>
<p>Wait, it gets better. This whole process is incredibly <a href="http://www.nwf.org/news/story.cfm?pageId=B2D18EDB-F1F6-7B10-31D1A0AE6C49B57B">sneaky</a>. These suggested changes are not even subject to Congressional approval. Outside of that, the Interior Department is only allowing comments on the proposal for 30 days, and in an attempt to reduce public outcry <a href="http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/blogs/green/detail?&#38;entry_id=29177">they are not accepting any comments via email</a> - snail mail only!</p>
<p>If this sounds sketch, it should. With the proposed changes, for example, agencies won&#8217;t even be required to assess how their projects will contribute to global warming, or the effect of those emissions on species and habitat. And that&#8217;s just the tip of the iceberg. Of course, we won&#8217;t have many of those around if these changes are allowed.</p>
<p>Fact is, this proposal is obscene and another wicked example of the Bush administration circumventing the law. And don&#8217;t let them fool you&#8230;the consequences are grand, such that <a href="http://climateprogress.org/2008/08/11/global-warming-unleashes-worlds-largest-land-predators-on-humans/">we ourselves might might make the endangered list</a>.</p>
<h3>Take Action:</h3>
<p><span style="color: #ff0000"><strong><a href="http://www.nrdconline.org/campaign/protect_endangered_wildlife">Comment Online via the NRDC</a></strong></span></p>
<h3>Related Posts:</h3>
<p><strong><a title="Why Animals Matter" rel="bookmark" href="http://planetsave.com/blog/2008/05/30/where-issues-intertwine-why-animals-matter/">Where Issues Intertwine: Why Animals Matter</a><br />
<a title="Should All Arctic Species be Listed as Endangered?" rel="bookmark" href="http://planetsave.com/blog/2008/06/01/should-all-arctic-species-be-listed-as-endangered/">Should All Arctic Species be Listed as Endangered?</a><br />
<a title="Alaska Sues to End the Polar Bear" rel="bookmark" href="../2008/08/05/alaska-sues-to-end-the-polar-bears-life/">Alaska Sues to End the Polar Bear</a></strong></p>
<p><strong>Image source: <a href="http://www.flickr.com/groups/voices/">Voices</a> at <a href="http://www.flickr.com/" target="_top">Flickr</a></strong></p>
]]></description>
    <wfw:commentRss>http://redgreenandblue.org/2008/08/18/the-proposed-neutering-of-our-endangered-species-act/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>Bush Administration Seeks Endangered Species Status for the Elusive &#8216;Climate Skeptic&#8217;</title>
    <link>http://redgreenandblue.org/2008/04/01/bush-administration-seeks-endangered-species-protection-for-elusive-climate-skeptics/</link>
    <comments>http://redgreenandblue.org/2008/04/01/bush-administration-seeks-endangered-species-protection-for-elusive-climate-skeptics/#comments</comments>
    <pubDate>Tue, 01 Apr 2008 18:58:12 +0000</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Timothy B. Hurst</dc:creator>
    
		<category><![CDATA[Climate Change]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Other Politics]]></category>

    <guid isPermaLink="false">http://redgreenandblue.org/2008/04/01/bush-administration-seeks-endangered-species-protection-for-elusive-climate-skeptics/</guid>
    <description><![CDATA[<p><a title="bush-1.jpg" href="http://redgreenandblue.org/files/2008/04/bush-1.jpg"><img src="http://redgreenandblue.org/files/2008/04/bush-1.jpg" alt="george w. bush, endangered species, climate change, skeptics" width="535" height="419" /></a></p>
<p>In a stunning reversal of direction, the Bush administration has officially requested a new addition to the Endangered Species list. What threatened species could elicit this drastic change of course for the Bush Administration? It is, of course, the elusive Climate Change Skeptic (<em>dubium mundus fervesco</em>), whose habitat is being threatened by rational thinking, increased rates of deforestation, low gas-mileage standards, and the abundance of  &#8220;cheap&#8221; coal. The stunning news comes just after a story in <a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2008/03/22/AR2008032202204.html?hpid=topnews&#38;sid=ST2008032300179">the Washington Post</a> reported that <strong>the current administration has never requested that an animal be protected by the Endangered Species Act</strong>.  Of the current administration’s 59 listed species, none of them were requested by the administration themselves.</p>
<p>But the Bush administration is not alone in wanting to protect such skeptics as Fred Singer and Patrick Michaels, in fear that the breed may die out completely in the coming years. Fortunately, the skeptics have received <a href="http://www.exxonsecrets.org/">significant funding</a> from coal and oil companies, including ExxonMobil.
<p><a href="http://redgreenandblue.org/2008/04/01/bush-administration-seeks-endangered-species-protection-for-elusive-climate-skeptics/" class="more-link">Read more of this story &#187;</a></p>
]]></description>
    <wfw:commentRss>http://redgreenandblue.org/2008/04/01/bush-administration-seeks-endangered-species-protection-for-elusive-climate-skeptics/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
  </item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- 119 queries in 0.342 seconds. -->