<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
  xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
  xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
  >

<channel>
  <title>Green Options &#187; energy cost</title>
  <link>http://greenoptions.com/tag/energy-cost</link>
  <description>Posts tagged 'energy cost'</description>
  <pubDate>Thu, 19 Mar 2009 19:00:01 +0000</pubDate>
  <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
  <language>en</language>
  <item>
    <title>Worst Heating Bill in US Cut in Half</title>
    <link>http://greenbuildingelements.com/2009/03/19/worst-heating-bill-in-us-cut-in-half/</link>
    <comments>http://greenbuildingelements.com/2009/03/19/worst-heating-bill-in-us-cut-in-half/#comments</comments>
    <pubDate>Thu, 19 Mar 2009 19:00:01 +0000</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Dawn Killough</dc:creator>
    
		<category><![CDATA[Doors &amp; Windows]]></category>

    <guid isPermaLink="false">http://greenbuildingelements.com/2009/03/19/worst-heating-bill-in-us-cut-in-half/</guid>
    <description><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://greenbuildingelements.com/files/2009/03/quimby-house.jpg"><img class="alignleft size-medium wp-image-1017" src="http://go635254.s3.amazonaws.com/greenbuildingelements/files/2009/03/quimby-house.jpg" alt="" width="268" height="242" /></a></p>
<p>JELD-WEN, the window manufacturer, set out to find the house with the worst heating bill in the United States last year.  They found it in Maine.  A 119-year old farmhouse that incurred a December bill of $1,100, and had spent over $5,000 during the year in home heating oil.</p>
<p>What could be done to help the poor homeowners stuck with this atrocious energy sucker?  JELD-WEN provided 35 new Energy Star rated windows, two AuraLast wood doors, and some basement insulation - free of charge.  Did it make a difference?  You bet.</p>
<p><a href="http://greenbuildingelements.com/2009/03/19/worst-heating-bill-in-us-cut-in-half/" class="more-link">Read more of this story &#187;</a></p>
]]></description>
    <wfw:commentRss>http://greenbuildingelements.com/2009/03/19/worst-heating-bill-in-us-cut-in-half/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>McCain&#8217;s Nuclear Energy Plan May Cost $315 Billion</title>
    <link>http://redgreenandblue.org/2008/09/11/mccains-nuclear-energy-plan-may-cost-315-billion/</link>
    <comments>http://redgreenandblue.org/2008/09/11/mccains-nuclear-energy-plan-may-cost-315-billion/#comments</comments>
    <pubDate>Fri, 12 Sep 2008 01:11:33 +0000</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Dana Nuccitelli</dc:creator>
    
		<category><![CDATA[Center]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Choice]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Energy]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[US Election]]></category>

    <guid isPermaLink="false">http://redgreenandblue.org/2008/09/11/mccains-nuclear-energy-plan-may-cost-315-billion/</guid>
    <description><![CDATA[<p><strong>According to a Bloomberg analysis, John McCain&#8217;s plan to revive the U.S. nuclear power industry with 45 new reactors may cost $315 billion, with taxpayers bearing much of the financial risk. </strong></p>
<p style="text-align: center"><img class="aligncenter" style="vertical-align: top" src="http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/4/4e/Nuclear_Power_Plant_Cattenom.jpg" alt="nuclear plants" width="500" height="300" /></p>
<p>The Republican presidential nominee expects a 29% increase in electricity demand by 2030, and wants 45 new nuclear power plants built by then.  Industry estimates put their cost at $7 billion each.</p>
<p>The <a href="http://www.eia.doe.gov/oiaf/aeo/assumption/electricity.html" target="_blank">Energy Information Administration</a> estimated last year that adding nuclear power capacity would cost $2,143 a kilowatt (kW) before financing and inflation. That compared with $1,434 to $2,302 for clean-coal technologies.</p>
<p>Over the past year, the expense has more than doubled to $5,000 a kilowatt, or $7 billion for a typical reactor, utility filings and company statements show. The increase in part reflects rising prices for commodities such as steel and cement.</p>
<p><a href="http://redgreenandblue.org/2008/09/11/mccains-nuclear-energy-plan-may-cost-315-billion/" class="more-link">Read more of this story &#187;</a></p>
]]></description>
    <wfw:commentRss>http://redgreenandblue.org/2008/09/11/mccains-nuclear-energy-plan-may-cost-315-billion/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
  </item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- 122 queries in 0.358 seconds. -->