<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
  xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
  xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
  >

<channel>
  <title>Green Options &#187; environmental impact statement</title>
  <link>http://greenoptions.com/tag/environmental-impact-statement</link>
  <description>Posts tagged 'environmental impact statement'</description>
  <pubDate>Fri, 20 Mar 2009 03:33:20 +0000</pubDate>
  <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
  <language>en</language>
  <item>
    <title>Hawaii&#8217;s Superferry Deemed Unconstitutional, Put Out of Business</title>
    <link>http://redgreenandblue.org/2009/03/19/hawaiis-superferry-deemed-unconstitutional-put-out-of-business/</link>
    <comments>http://redgreenandblue.org/2009/03/19/hawaiis-superferry-deemed-unconstitutional-put-out-of-business/#comments</comments>
    <pubDate>Fri, 20 Mar 2009 03:33:20 +0000</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Amanda Peterka</dc:creator>
    
		<category><![CDATA[Leader]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Policy]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[U.S.]]></category>

    <guid isPermaLink="false">http://redgreenandblue.org/2009/03/19/hawaiis-superferry-deemed-unconstitutional-put-out-of-business/</guid>
    <description><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://redgreenandblue.org/files/2009/03/superferry.jpg"><img class="alignright size-medium wp-image-2793" src="http://go635254.s3.amazonaws.com/redgreenandblue/files/2009/03/superferry-300x225.jpg" alt="" width="300" height="225" /></a>The behemoth of transportation in Hawaii, the Superferry, is shutting its doors as of this week after the Supreme Court ruled that an act giving it permission to run without the proper environmental regulations was unconstitutional.</p>
<p>The ferry, a monster that could hold 866 people and 282 cars and that uses more fuel than a large plane, was kept running for a year even though it never had the Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) that&#8217;s required by the state of Hawaii.
<p><a href="http://redgreenandblue.org/2009/03/19/hawaiis-superferry-deemed-unconstitutional-put-out-of-business/" class="more-link">Read more of this story &#187;</a></p>
]]></description>
    <wfw:commentRss>http://redgreenandblue.org/2009/03/19/hawaiis-superferry-deemed-unconstitutional-put-out-of-business/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>Survey Says: Support for Cape Wind Surging</title>
    <link>http://redgreenandblue.org/2008/03/09/and-the-survey-says-support-for-cape-wind-surging/</link>
    <comments>http://redgreenandblue.org/2008/03/09/and-the-survey-says-support-for-cape-wind-surging/#comments</comments>
    <pubDate>Sun, 09 Mar 2008 09:47:59 +0000</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Timothy B. Hurst</dc:creator>
    
		<category><![CDATA[Energy]]></category>

    <guid isPermaLink="false">http://redgreenandblue.org/2008/03/09/and-the-survey-says-support-for-cape-wind-surging/</guid>
    <description><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://redgreenandblue.org/files/2008/03/offshore_wind_phault.jpg" title="offshore_wind_phault.jpg"><img src="http://go635254.s3.amazonaws.com/redgreenandblue/files/2008/03/offshore_wind_phault.jpg" alt="offshore-wind, wine-energy, cape-wind, civil-society-institute, mms, public comment, eis" /></a>A recent <a href="http://www.civilsocietyinstitute.org/media/pdfs/030608%20CSI%20MA%20Cape%20Wind%20survey%20report.pdf">survey</a> (pdf) found that <strong>87 percent of Massachusetts residents say they</strong><strong> are now “more likely to support Cape Wind”</strong> in the wake of the recently issued draft environmental impact statement (EIS) that found no major environmental harms resulting from the project. It seems that the <strong>growing public consciousness of climate change is actually producing measurable shifts in the public mood</strong>.  Time is clearly running out for Cape Wind opponents. And despite the recent <a href="http://www.mms.gov/ooc/press/2008/press0305a.htm">30-day extension</a> of the <a href="http://planetsave.com/blog/2008/02/13/democracy-tell-the-feds-what-you-think-about-cape-wind/">public comment period</a> granted by the U.S. Minerals Management Service (at the behest of the <a href="http://www.saveoursound.org/site/PageServer?pagename=About_Us_Stakeholders">Alliance to Protect Nantucket Sound</a>), it is my firm belief that this project will soon get the federal stamp of approval it has been seeking (to go along with the <a href="http://www.capewind.org/article72.htm#DEIS">federal approval it <em>already</em> got back in 2004</a>). In what should make for a pretty entertaining roadshow, the <strong>MMS is beginning a four-night run of public hearings starting on Monday March 10th</strong> in West Yarmouth, MA. The hearings will then rumble through Nantucket and Martha&#8217;s Vineyard before concluding in Boston on March 13. If you are not lucky enough to attend, what will certainly be &#8220;spirited&#8221; events,  you may submit an <a href="http://www.mms.gov/offshore/RenewableEnergy/CapeWind.htm">e-comment</a> no later than April 21.</p>
<p><a href="http://redgreenandblue.org/2008/03/09/and-the-survey-says-support-for-cape-wind-surging/" class="more-link">Read more of this story &#187;</a></p>
]]></description>
    <wfw:commentRss>http://redgreenandblue.org/2008/03/09/and-the-survey-says-support-for-cape-wind-surging/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
  </item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- 123 queries in 0.391 seconds. -->