<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
  xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
  xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
  >

<channel>
  <title>Green Options &#187; ESA</title>
  <link>http://greenoptions.com/tag/esa</link>
  <description>Posts tagged 'ESA'</description>
  <pubDate>Wed, 07 Oct 2009 01:39:59 +0000</pubDate>
  <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
  <language>en</language>
  <item>
    <title>Cook Inlet Beluga Whale Population Decreases to 321: New NOAA Survey</title>
    <link>http://ecoworldly.com/2009/10/07/cook-inlet-beluga-whale-population-decreases-to-321-new-noaa-survey/</link>
    <comments>http://ecoworldly.com/2009/10/07/cook-inlet-beluga-whale-population-decreases-to-321-new-noaa-survey/#comments</comments>
    <pubDate>Wed, 07 Oct 2009 01:39:59 +0000</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Rhishja Larson</dc:creator>
    
		<category><![CDATA[About Animals]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[In The Americas]]></category>

    <guid isPermaLink="false">http://ecoworldly.com/2009/10/07/cook-inlet-beluga-whale-population-decreases-to-321-new-noaa-survey/</guid>
    <description><![CDATA[<p><a rel="attachment wp-att-4207" href="http://ecoworldly.com/2009/10/07/cook-inlet-beluga-whale-population-decreases-to-321-new-noaa-survey/beluga-population-decreasing/"><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-4207" src="http://go635254.s3.amazonaws.com/ecoworldly/files/2009/10/beluga-population-decreasing.jpg" alt="Beluga image for article about Cook Inlet beluga whale population decrease" width="500" height="332" /></a></p>
<h3>The most recent NOAA Fisheries Service&#8217;s population survey reveals a decline in Cook Inlet beluga whale numbers.</h3>
<p>Alaska&#8217;s small population of critically endangered Cook Inlet beluga whales is continuing to decline even further, according to the new survey by <a href="http://www.fakr.noaa.gov/newsreleases/2009/cibeluga100609.htm" target="_blank">NOAA scientists</a>.</p>
<p><a href="http://ecoworldly.com/2009/10/07/cook-inlet-beluga-whale-population-decreases-to-321-new-noaa-survey/" class="more-link">Read more of this story &#187;</a></p>
]]></description>
    <wfw:commentRss>http://ecoworldly.com/2009/10/07/cook-inlet-beluga-whale-population-decreases-to-321-new-noaa-survey/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>Gray Wolves in Western Great Lakes Returned to Endangered Species List</title>
    <link>http://ecoworldly.com/2009/09/17/gray-wolves-in-western-great-lakes-returned-to-endangered-species-list/</link>
    <comments>http://ecoworldly.com/2009/09/17/gray-wolves-in-western-great-lakes-returned-to-endangered-species-list/#comments</comments>
    <pubDate>Thu, 17 Sep 2009 16:00:24 +0000</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Rhishja Larson</dc:creator>
    
		<category><![CDATA[About Animals]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[In The Americas]]></category>

    <guid isPermaLink="false">http://ecoworldly.com/2009/09/17/gray-wolves-in-western-great-lakes-returned-to-endangered-species-list/</guid>
    <description><![CDATA[<p><a rel="attachment wp-att-3988" href="http://ecoworldly.com/2009/09/17/gray-wolves-in-western-great-lakes-returned-to-endangered-species-list/snow-wolf/"><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-3988" src="http://go635254.s3.amazonaws.com/ecoworldly/files/2009/09/snow-wolf.jpg" alt="Wolf image for article about USFWS reinstating wolves to endangered species list in western Great Leakes region" width="500" height="408" /></a></p>
<h3>Endangered species protections have been reinstated for the gray wolf in the western Great Lakes region.</h3>
<p>The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service has <a href="http://www.fws.gov/midwest/News/release.cfm?rid=118" target="_blank">announced</a> that Endangered Species Act protections are reinstated for the gray wolf in the western Great Lakes region.</p>
<p>However, the status may only be temporary.</p>
<p><a href="http://ecoworldly.com/2009/09/17/gray-wolves-in-western-great-lakes-returned-to-endangered-species-list/" class="more-link">Read more of this story &#187;</a></p>
]]></description>
    <wfw:commentRss>http://ecoworldly.com/2009/09/17/gray-wolves-in-western-great-lakes-returned-to-endangered-species-list/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>Pacific Walrus Threatened by Global Warming, Oil Development: Feds Considering ESA Protections</title>
    <link>http://ecoworldly.com/2009/09/09/pacific-walrus-threatened-by-global-warming-oil-development-feds-considering-esa-protections/</link>
    <comments>http://ecoworldly.com/2009/09/09/pacific-walrus-threatened-by-global-warming-oil-development-feds-considering-esa-protections/#comments</comments>
    <pubDate>Wed, 09 Sep 2009 03:17:13 +0000</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Rhishja Larson</dc:creator>
    
		<category><![CDATA[About Animals]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[About Climate]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[In Antarctica / The Arctic]]></category>

    <guid isPermaLink="false">http://ecoworldly.com/2009/09/09/pacific-walrus-threatened-by-global-warming-oil-development-feds-considering-esa-protections/</guid>
    <description><![CDATA[<p><a rel="attachment wp-att-3907" href="http://ecoworldly.com/2009/09/09/pacific-walrus-threatened-by-global-warming-oil-development-feds-considering-esa-protections/walrus-pair/"><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-3907" src="http://go635254.s3.amazonaws.com/ecoworldly/files/2009/09/walrus-pair.jpg" alt="Walrus image for global warming, endangered species protection article" width="500" height="308" /></a></p>
<h3>Finally, the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service is reviewing the status of the Pacific walrus to determine whether or not the marine mammal will receive Endangered Species Act protections.</h3>
<p>The <a href="http://www.biologicaldiversity.org/news/press_releases/2009/pacific-walrus-09-08-2009.html" target="_blank">Center for Biological Diversity</a> stated that the Pacific walrus (<em>Odobenus rosmarus divergens</em>) is facing a double threat to its ice habitat: Global warming and increased oil development.</p>
<p>A petition seeking protection for the Pacific walrus was submitted by the Center back in February 2008. After the USFWS failed to respond to the petition, the Center filed a lawsuit - prompting the USFWS to take action.</p>
<p><a href="http://ecoworldly.com/2009/09/09/pacific-walrus-threatened-by-global-warming-oil-development-feds-considering-esa-protections/" class="more-link">Read more of this story &#187;</a></p>
]]></description>
    <wfw:commentRss>http://ecoworldly.com/2009/09/09/pacific-walrus-threatened-by-global-warming-oil-development-feds-considering-esa-protections/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>4 Million Pounds of Space Junk Polluting Earth&#8217;s Orbit</title>
    <link>http://ecoworldly.com/2009/08/14/4-million-pounds-of-space-junk-polluting-earths-orbit/</link>
    <comments>http://ecoworldly.com/2009/08/14/4-million-pounds-of-space-junk-polluting-earths-orbit/#comments</comments>
    <pubDate>Fri, 14 Aug 2009 13:05:15 +0000</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Timothy B. Hurst</dc:creator>
    
		<category><![CDATA[About Science]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[About Technology]]></category>

    <guid isPermaLink="false">http://ecoworldly.com/2009/08/14/4-million-pounds-of-space-junk-polluting-earths-orbit/</guid>
    <description><![CDATA[<p style="text-align: center"><a href="http://cleantechnica.com/files/2009/05/bee-hive-leo_h1.jpg"><img class="alignnone size-full wp-image-2568 aligncenter" src="http://cleantechnica.com/files/2009/05/bee-hive-leo_h1.jpg" alt="space junk" width="500" height="317" /></a></p>
<h4><strong>Millions of nuts, bolts, pieces of metal and carbon, and whole spacecraft from thousands of missions and launches form an orbiting garbage dump spinning around the Earth at speeds up to 22,000 mph. </strong></h4>

<p>After the recent <a href="http://news.cnet.com/us-and-russian-satellites-collide/">collision between a Russian and U.S. satellite</a>, concern for the growing hazard of space junk is becoming even more acute within the international space community. In recent months, NASA and the European Space Agency have both diverted resources into monitoring space debris and researching ways of mitigating and—some day—removing it.</p>
<p><a href="http://ecoworldly.com/2009/08/14/4-million-pounds-of-space-junk-polluting-earths-orbit/" class="more-link">Read more of this story &#187;</a></p>
]]></description>
    <wfw:commentRss>http://ecoworldly.com/2009/08/14/4-million-pounds-of-space-junk-polluting-earths-orbit/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>Bush Delivers Five Final Blows to the Environment</title>
    <link>http://planetsave.com/blog/2009/01/07/bush-delivers-five-final-blows-to-the-environment/</link>
    <comments>http://planetsave.com/blog/2009/01/07/bush-delivers-five-final-blows-to-the-environment/#comments</comments>
    <pubDate>Wed, 07 Jan 2009 03:15:56 +0000</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Michael A. Weber</dc:creator>
    
		<category><![CDATA[Environmental Policies]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>

    <guid isPermaLink="false">http://planetsave.com/blog/2009/01/07/bush-delivers-five-final-blows-to-the-environment/</guid>
    <description><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://planetsave.com/files/2009/01/clearcut.jpg"><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-3697" src="http://go635254.s3.amazonaws.com/planetsave/files/2009/01/clearcut.jpg" alt="" width="500" height="319" /></a></p>
<p><strong>Though President Bush remains in office for only two more weeks, he has left a final trail of devastation to cement his legacy in place. From gutting the endangered species act to allowing toxic waste to flow freely, Bush is pushing 11<sup>th</sup> hour executive orders at a <a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2008/10/30/AR2008103004749.html">potentially record setting</a> pace. </strong></p>
<p>His list of last minute domestic atrocities is not limited to the environment, but many of his most egregious final offenses are those that spoil sensitive habitat and natural resources. This list is merely a sample of Bush&#8217;s midnight regulations, along with what is being done to stop him. Here are George Bush&#8217;s top five most disgraceful efforts to ruin our environment once more.</p>
<p><strong>5) </strong><strong>Actual pine woods to be replaced with a suburb named &#8220;Pine Woods&#8221;.</strong> Plum Creek Timber, the nation&#8217;s largest private landowner, has <a href="http://www.boston.com/bostonglobe/editorial_opinion/oped/articles/2009/01/06/bushs_one_last_blow_to_environment/">crafted a back door deal with the Bush administration</a> to allow them to pave over logging roads and develop the previously inaccessible land. Local forest agencies are furious about the back door deal, which is being finalized this week. It might not be too late to stop it, so call 1-800-832-1355 and tell <a href="http://www.fs.fed.us/">Forest Service</a> director (and former timber industry lobbyist) to stop opening up our forests for development.</p>
<p><a href="http://planetsave.com/blog/2009/01/07/bush-delivers-five-final-blows-to-the-environment/" class="more-link">Read more of this story &#187;</a></p>
]]></description>
    <wfw:commentRss>http://planetsave.com/blog/2009/01/07/bush-delivers-five-final-blows-to-the-environment/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>Scientists: Space Lasers Could Measure Atmospheric Carbon Dioxide</title>
    <link>http://cleantechnica.com/2008/12/08/scientists-space-lasers-could-measure-atmospheric-carbon-dioxide/</link>
    <comments>http://cleantechnica.com/2008/12/08/scientists-space-lasers-could-measure-atmospheric-carbon-dioxide/#comments</comments>
    <pubDate>Mon, 08 Dec 2008 20:31:07 +0000</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Ariel Schwartz</dc:creator>
    
		<category><![CDATA[carbon emissions]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[technology]]></category>

    <guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/2008/12/08/scientists-space-lasers-could-measure-atmospheric-carbon-dioxide/</guid>
    <description><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://cleantechnica.com/files/2008/12/081203133817-large.jpg"><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-1650" src="http://go635254.s3.amazonaws.com/cleantechnica/files/2008/12/081203133817-large.jpg" alt="lasers" width="500" height="364" /></a></p>
<p>Lasers: They&#8217;re more than just fun toys. The European Space Agency (ESA) recently <a href="http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2008/12/081203133817.htm">demonstrated </a>how lasers can accurately measure atmospheric CO2 levels. The A-SCOPE (Advanced Space Carbon and Climate Observation of Planet Earth) space mission is one of six being considered by the agency.</p>
<p><a href="http://cleantechnica.com/2008/12/08/scientists-space-lasers-could-measure-atmospheric-carbon-dioxide/" class="more-link">Read more of this story &#187;</a></p>
]]></description>
    <wfw:commentRss>http://cleantechnica.com/2008/12/08/scientists-space-lasers-could-measure-atmospheric-carbon-dioxide/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>US Endangered Species Could Lose Vital Protection</title>
    <link>http://redgreenandblue.org/2008/11/20/us-endangered-species-could-lose-vital-protection/</link>
    <comments>http://redgreenandblue.org/2008/11/20/us-endangered-species-could-lose-vital-protection/#comments</comments>
    <pubDate>Thu, 20 Nov 2008 21:15:43 +0000</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Andrew Williams</dc:creator>
    
		<category><![CDATA[Conservative]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Leader]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Policy]]></category>

    <guid isPermaLink="false">http://redgreenandblue.org/2008/11/20/us-endangered-species-could-lose-vital-protection/</guid>
    <description><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://redgreenandblue.org/files/2008/11/grizzly-chascar.jpg"><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-1662" src="http://go635254.s3.amazonaws.com/redgreenandblue/files/2008/11/grizzly-chascar.jpg" alt="" width="500" height="344" /></a></p>

<p><strong>Endangered US animal and plant species are in danger of losing <a title="endangered" href="http://www.google.com/hostednews/ap/article/ALeqM5hXBV9U9SBb_hysHw0UpNdHvcmx4gD94ICH781" target="_blank">vital legal protection designed to prevent them from extinction</a>.</strong></p>
<p>The outgoing Bush administration is proposing to <strong><a title="esa" href="http://redgreenandblue.org/2008/08/18/the-proposed-neutering-of-our-endangered-species-act/" target="_self">rush through legislation</a></strong> that will remove the right of government experts to ensure that dams, highways and other big infrastructure projects don&#8217;t pose an unacceptable threat to fragile plants and animals under the Endangered Species Act (ESA). Crucially, the regulations must be approved by Friday if they are to come into effect before President-elect Obama&#8217;s swearing-in ceremony on January 20th.</p>
<p><a href="http://redgreenandblue.org/2008/11/20/us-endangered-species-could-lose-vital-protection/" class="more-link">Read more of this story &#187;</a></p>
]]></description>
    <wfw:commentRss>http://redgreenandblue.org/2008/11/20/us-endangered-species-could-lose-vital-protection/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>Palin Protests Federal Listing of Beluga Whales as Endangered</title>
    <link>http://redgreenandblue.org/2008/10/18/beluga-whales-as-listed-as-endangered-in-alaska-gov-palin-protests/</link>
    <comments>http://redgreenandblue.org/2008/10/18/beluga-whales-as-listed-as-endangered-in-alaska-gov-palin-protests/#comments</comments>
    <pubDate>Sun, 19 Oct 2008 03:50:24 +0000</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Timothy B. Hurst</dc:creator>
    
		<category><![CDATA[Center]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Climate Change]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Leader]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Other Politics]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Policy]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[US Election]]></category>

    <guid isPermaLink="false">http://redgreenandblue.org/2008/10/18/beluga-whales-as-listed-as-endangered-in-alaska-gov-palin-protests/</guid>
    <description><![CDATA[<h3 style="text-align: center">Again questions science behind an endangered species listing</h3>
<p style="text-align: center"><img class="alignnone size-full wp-image-1364 aligncenter" src="http://go635254.s3.amazonaws.com/redgreenandblue/files/2008/10/picture-56.png" alt="beluga whale" width="497" height="327" /></p>
<p>The beluga whales of Alaska&#8217;s Cook Inlet are endangered and require additional protection to survive, officials from the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) said Friday. The <a href="http://www.noaanews.noaa.gov/stories2008/20081017_belugawhale.html">ruling</a> contradicts Alaska Governor Sarah Palin&#8217;s administration who has questioned the science showing a decline in the distinctive white species.</p>
<p>It was the second wildlife-themed rebuke Gov. Palin received from Washington this year. The governor had previously <a href="http://redgreenandblue.org/2008/08/05/alaska-sues-to-end-the-polar-bears-life/">asked federal courts to overturn</a> an Interior Department decision declaring polar bears threatened under the Endangered Species Act.</p>
<p><a href="http://redgreenandblue.org/2008/10/18/beluga-whales-as-listed-as-endangered-in-alaska-gov-palin-protests/" class="more-link">Read more of this story &#187;</a></p>
]]></description>
    <wfw:commentRss>http://redgreenandblue.org/2008/10/18/beluga-whales-as-listed-as-endangered-in-alaska-gov-palin-protests/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>Wildlife Agencies Told Not to Care About Endangered Species</title>
    <link>http://redgreenandblue.org/2008/10/15/wildlife-agencies-told-not-to-care-about-endangered-species/</link>
    <comments>http://redgreenandblue.org/2008/10/15/wildlife-agencies-told-not-to-care-about-endangered-species/#comments</comments>
    <pubDate>Wed, 15 Oct 2008 19:42:23 +0000</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Amanda Peterka</dc:creator>
    
		<category><![CDATA[Climate Change]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Leader]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Liberal]]></category>

    <guid isPermaLink="false">http://redgreenandblue.org/2008/10/15/wildlife-agencies-told-not-to-care-about-endangered-species/</guid>
    <description><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://redgreenandblue.org/files/2008/10/bush-wrong-way.jpg"><img class="aligncenter size-medium wp-image-1335" src="http://go635254.s3.amazonaws.com/redgreenandblue/files/2008/10/bush-wrong-way-300x110.jpg" alt="" width="300" height="110" /></a>Sarah Palin says <a href="http://redgreenandblue.org/2008/10/03/sarah-palin-on-climate-change-the-causes-dont-matter/">the causes don&#8217;t matter</a>. The Bush Administration admits they do, but says that since there&#8217;s no single source of greenhouse gases, wildlife agencies should ignore global warming.</p>
<p>Federal wildlife agencies have been told <a href="http://www.peer.org/news/news_id.php?row_id=1119" target="_blank">not to analyze</a> the effects of emissions on species or habitats. This means that if you have a power-plant near a habitat, the agencies aren&#8217;t supposed to look into its emissions in relation to global warming effects on the local species&#8230;even if the power plant is the only thing in the area, and <a href="http://www.miamiherald.com/news/politics/AP/story/726100.html" target="_blank">even if the species are part of the Endangered Species Act</a>.
<p><a href="http://redgreenandblue.org/2008/10/15/wildlife-agencies-told-not-to-care-about-endangered-species/" class="more-link">Read more of this story &#187;</a></p>
]]></description>
    <wfw:commentRss>http://redgreenandblue.org/2008/10/15/wildlife-agencies-told-not-to-care-about-endangered-species/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>The Proposed Neutering of Our Endangered Species Act</title>
    <link>http://redgreenandblue.org/2008/08/18/the-proposed-neutering-of-our-endangered-species-act/</link>
    <comments>http://redgreenandblue.org/2008/08/18/the-proposed-neutering-of-our-endangered-species-act/#comments</comments>
    <pubDate>Mon, 18 Aug 2008 16:33:03 +0000</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Jerry James Stone</dc:creator>
    
		<category><![CDATA[Leader]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Liberal]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Policy]]></category>

    <guid isPermaLink="false">http://redgreenandblue.org/2008/08/18/the-proposed-neutering-of-our-endangered-species-act/</guid>
    <description><![CDATA[<p><img class="alignleft" style="float: left;margin-left: 10px;margin-right: 10px" src="http://static.flickr.com/64/207836370_501760ba77.jpg" alt="" width="305" height="305" />On Monday, the Bush administration proposed a policy that threatens to weaken the Endangered Species Act (ESA) to the point of extinction. <a href="http://redgreenandblue.org/2008/04/01/bush-administration-seeks-endangered-species-protection-for-elusive-climate-skeptics/">This comes as no surprise</a>. Like the war in Iraq, removing the fetters of environmental protection has been <a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2008/03/22/AR2008032202204.html">an administrational goal since 2001</a>. Unlike the war in Iraq, this time Bush and his cronies could very well succeed.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.ewire.com/display.cfm/Wire_ID/4943">Targeting the ESA&#8217;s consultation process</a>, the policy changes boil down to this: <strong>only when a federal agency feels their intended actions could bring about harm must they consult an outside agency like the Fish and Wildlife Service</strong>. Currently,  all of these decisions are subject to an independent scientific review.</p>
<p>If the ambiguity of that policy makes you uncomfortable then please raise your hand because it scares the crap out of me.</p>
<p>First off, our current administration has been, if anything, consistent in its attempt to <a href="http://www.wiredprnews.com/2008/08/17/white-house-disregards-law_20080817595.html">sidestep environmental policy over the past seven years</a>. Consider this, Bush&#8217;s administration has only added about 60 species to the endangered species list. That is about 10-percent of what was listed under the Clinton administration, and only about 3-percent of what the Reagan administration listed. Even George Bush&#8217;s dad added around 200 species to the list!</p>
<p>Wait, it gets better. This whole process is incredibly <a href="http://www.nwf.org/news/story.cfm?pageId=B2D18EDB-F1F6-7B10-31D1A0AE6C49B57B">sneaky</a>. These suggested changes are not even subject to Congressional approval. Outside of that, the Interior Department is only allowing comments on the proposal for 30 days, and in an attempt to reduce public outcry <a href="http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/blogs/green/detail?&#38;entry_id=29177">they are not accepting any comments via email</a> - snail mail only!</p>
<p>If this sounds sketch, it should. With the proposed changes, for example, agencies won&#8217;t even be required to assess how their projects will contribute to global warming, or the effect of those emissions on species and habitat. And that&#8217;s just the tip of the iceberg. Of course, we won&#8217;t have many of those around if these changes are allowed.</p>
<p>Fact is, this proposal is obscene and another wicked example of the Bush administration circumventing the law. And don&#8217;t let them fool you&#8230;the consequences are grand, such that <a href="http://climateprogress.org/2008/08/11/global-warming-unleashes-worlds-largest-land-predators-on-humans/">we ourselves might might make the endangered list</a>.</p>
<h3>Take Action:</h3>
<p><span style="color: #ff0000"><strong><a href="http://www.nrdconline.org/campaign/protect_endangered_wildlife">Comment Online via the NRDC</a></strong></span></p>
<h3>Related Posts:</h3>
<p><strong><a title="Why Animals Matter" rel="bookmark" href="http://planetsave.com/blog/2008/05/30/where-issues-intertwine-why-animals-matter/">Where Issues Intertwine: Why Animals Matter</a><br />
<a title="Should All Arctic Species be Listed as Endangered?" rel="bookmark" href="http://planetsave.com/blog/2008/06/01/should-all-arctic-species-be-listed-as-endangered/">Should All Arctic Species be Listed as Endangered?</a><br />
<a title="Alaska Sues to End the Polar Bear" rel="bookmark" href="../2008/08/05/alaska-sues-to-end-the-polar-bears-life/">Alaska Sues to End the Polar Bear</a></strong></p>
<p><strong>Image source: <a href="http://www.flickr.com/groups/voices/">Voices</a> at <a href="http://www.flickr.com/" target="_top">Flickr</a></strong></p>
]]></description>
    <wfw:commentRss>http://redgreenandblue.org/2008/08/18/the-proposed-neutering-of-our-endangered-species-act/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>Should All Arctic Species be Listed as Endangered?</title>
    <link>http://planetsave.com/blog/2008/06/01/should-all-arctic-species-be-listed-as-endangered/</link>
    <comments>http://planetsave.com/blog/2008/06/01/should-all-arctic-species-be-listed-as-endangered/#comments</comments>
    <pubDate>Sun, 01 Jun 2008 17:18:39 +0000</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Joshua S Hill</dc:creator>
    
		<category><![CDATA[Nature &amp; Conservation]]></category>

    <guid isPermaLink="false">http://planetsave.com/blog/2008/06/01/should-all-arctic-species-be-listed-as-endangered/</guid>
    <description><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://planetsave.com/files/2008/06/181272591-198afe2cf7.jpg"><img height="180" alt="181272591_198afe2cf7" src="http://go635254.s3.amazonaws.com/planetsave/files/2008/06/181272591-198afe2cf7-thumb.jpg" width="240" align="left"/></a> It has only been a fortnight or so since the polar bear was finally listed as an endangered species under the US Endangered Species Act, and already conservationists have supplied some more names for the ESA; ringed, bearded and spotted seals.  </p>
<p>The Center for Biological Conservation was the group who filed a petition on February 17, 2005, asking that the polar bear be listed under the ESA. They have followed the landmark decision approving this petition by adding the three seals for consideration as species under threat. The “landmark” aspect of these decisions is that the polar bear was the first animal to be recognized as threatened as a direct result of climate change.  </p>
<p>&#8220;While the polar bear may be the first Arctic species listed under the Endangered Species Act due to global warming, it will, unfortunately, not be the last,&#8221; says Shaye Wolf, a biologist with the Center for Biological Diversity.</p>
<p><a href="http://planetsave.com/blog/2008/06/01/should-all-arctic-species-be-listed-as-endangered/" class="more-link">Read more of this story &#187;</a></p>
]]></description>
    <wfw:commentRss>http://planetsave.com/blog/2008/06/01/should-all-arctic-species-be-listed-as-endangered/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
  </item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- 405 queries in 1.172 seconds. -->