<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
  xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
  xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
  >

<channel>
  <title>Green Options &#187; farm subsidies</title>
  <link>http://greenoptions.com/tag/farm-subsidies</link>
  <description>Posts tagged 'farm subsidies'</description>
  <pubDate>Sat, 20 Oct 2007 13:41:14 +0000</pubDate>
  <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
  <language>en</language>
  <item>
    <title>Ethanol Incentives Contribute to Gulf of Mexico Dead Zone</title>
    <link>http://claytonbodiecornell.greenoptions.com/2007/10/20/ethanol-incentives-contribute-to-gulf-of-mexico-dead-zone/</link>
    <comments>http://claytonbodiecornell.greenoptions.com/2007/10/20/ethanol-incentives-contribute-to-gulf-of-mexico-dead-zone/#comments</comments>
    <pubDate>Sat, 20 Oct 2007 13:41:14 +0000</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Clayton B. Cornell</dc:creator>
    
    <guid isPermaLink="false">http://claytonbodiecornell.greenoptions.com/2007/10/20/ethanol-incentives-contribute-to-gulf-of-mexico-dead-zone/</guid>
    <description><![CDATA[<p>
<img src="/files/32/ethanolpump.jpg" alt="" width="227" height="350" align="right" />It looks like ethanol subsidies may impede efforts to reduce the size of the Dead Zone in the Gulf of Mexico.  A draft report from the EPA Science Advisory Board says that ethanol subsidies could lead to a dramatic increase in nutrient loading in the Mississippi river basin, due to diverting cropland to corn production.
</p>
<blockquote>
<p>
	Recent energy policies, combined with pre-existing crop subsidies, tax policies, global market conditions and trade barriers all provide economic incentives for conversion of retired and other cropland to corn production for use in ethanol production. Such conversions could lead to corn production on an additional 16 million acres&#8230;
	</p>
</blockquote>
<p>
The Dead Zone, an area in which there isn&#8217;t enough dissolved oxygen to support aquatic life, has been measured in the Gulf of Mexico since 1985.  It&#8217;s caused by agricultural runoff overenriching the waters at the end of the Mississippi River - the downstream effect of millions of acres of intensely fertilized crops.  Nitrogen and phosphorous, intended for corn but ending up in the river, make their way to the Gulf causing excessive phytoplankton production.  In the process, all available oxygen is used up (hypoxia), and marine life has to move out or suffocate. </p>
<p>It turns out that the greater Mississippi-Atchafalaya River Basin (MARB) drains a grand total of 40% of the contiguous United States.  The cumulative effect of all this runnoff creates a Dead Zone approximatly 20,500 sq. km. - roughly the size of the state of New Jersey.</p>
<p>To address this issue, the Science Advisory board recommends a 45% reduction in nitrogen and phosphorous fluxes from farmland.  Unfortunately, recent trends pushing corn-based biofuels are not exactly aligned with this strategy:<br />
<!--break-->
</p>
<blockquote><p>
	Certain aspects of the nation’s current agricultural and energy policies are at odds with the goals of hypoxia reduction and improving water quality. . .[A]n emerging national strategy on renewable fuels has granted economic incentives to corn-based ethanol production.</p>
<p>	Without some change to the current structure of economic incentives favoring corn-based ethanol, N[itrogen] loadings to the MARB from increased corn production could increase dramatically in coming years, rather than decreasing, as needed&#8230;
</p></blockquote>
<p>
The alternative is cellulosic ethanol and avoiding corn-based fuels altogether:
</p>
<blockquote><p>
	Alternatively, the use of perennial crops and other feedstocks for cellulosic ethanol requires a more complex refining process that produces more net energy and results in lower fertilization and thus less nutrient runoff than corn-based ethanol.
</p></blockquote>
<p>
The Dead Zone in the Gulf of Mexico is a symptom our farming practices, and converting cropland to grow fuel will only exacerbate the problem.  This is just another  chapter in the corn-based ethanol saga.  The EPA&#8217;s Science Advisory Board will vote on approval of the draft report in December.</p>
<p>Green Car Congress: <a href="http://www.greencarcongress.com/2007/10/epa-science-adv.html">EPA Science Advisory Board Suggests Revisions to Ethanol Incentives Necessary to Reduce Gulf of Mexico “Dead Zone” </a><br />
<a href="http://www.epa.gov/sab/pdf/8-30-07_hap_draft.pdf">Science Advisory Board (SAB) Hypoxia Panel Draft Advisory Report </a>
</p>
<p><a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/kosherpickle/201168636/"><br />
Photo Credit</a></p>
]]></description>
    <wfw:commentRss>http://claytonbodiecornell.greenoptions.com/2007/10/20/ethanol-incentives-contribute-to-gulf-of-mexico-dead-zone/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>Red, Green and Blue: The Farm Bill</title>
    <link>http://shirleysilukgregory.greenoptions.com/2007/05/10/red-green-and-blue-the-farm-bill/</link>
    <comments>http://shirleysilukgregory.greenoptions.com/2007/05/10/red-green-and-blue-the-farm-bill/#comments</comments>
    <pubDate>Thu, 10 May 2007 13:01:44 +0000</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Shirley Siluk Gregory</dc:creator>
    
    <guid isPermaLink="false">http://shirleysilukgregory.greenoptions.com/2007/05/10/red-green-and-blue-the-farm-bill/</guid>
    <description><![CDATA[<p><img src="/files/images/farming_0.JPG" border="0" width="445" height="298" /> </p>
<p><em>Editor&#39;s note: In today&#39;s Red, Green and Blue, our political commentators </em><a href="http://www.greenoptions/user/jimmy_hogan"><em>Jimmy Hogan</em></a><em> and </em><a href="/user/shirley_siluk_gregory"><em>Shirley Siluk Gregory</em></a><em> weigh in on the U.S. Farm Bill and its related subsidies, due for reauthorization this year.</em> </p>
<p><strong>Shirley:</strong> If Congress is serious about solving the host of problems it claims it wants to fix &#8212; rising obesity and diet-related illnesses, polluted stormwater runoff and environmental degradation, food insecurity and overdependence on fossil fuels &#8212; it should look no further than the Farm Bill, which is due for reauthorization this year.</p>
<p>As it&#39;s crafted right now, the Farm Bill (which, as Michael Pollan writes, should more properly be termed the Food Bill) does little to promote small-scale or sustainable farming. But it&#39;s very good at driving chemical-dependent industrial agriculture that floods the market with cheap corn and other commodity crops. The results are an overwhelming supply of corn syrup and corn syrup-derived junk foods that are cheaper than healthy foods, and a system that undercuts family farmers both at home and abroad while helping Big Ag companies like Archer Daniels Midland, Monsanto and Tyson reap ever-growing profits and market share. </p>
<p>For the sake of food security, there&#39;s certainly a good case to be made for farm subsidies of the right kind, but that&#39;s not what we have right now.<!--break--></p>
]]></description>
    <wfw:commentRss>http://shirleysilukgregory.greenoptions.com/2007/05/10/red-green-and-blue-the-farm-bill/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
  </item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- 62 queries in 0.414 seconds. -->