<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
  xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
  xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
  >

<channel>
  <title>Green Options &#187; FEMA</title>
  <link>http://greenoptions.com/tag/fema</link>
  <description>Posts tagged 'FEMA'</description>
  <pubDate>Fri, 27 Feb 2009 17:33:34 +0000</pubDate>
  <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
  <language>en</language>
  <item>
    <title>700 New Chemicals Introduced Each Year Not Tested for Toxicity</title>
    <link>http://ecochildsplay.com/2009/02/27/700-new-chemicals-introduced-each-year-not-tested-for-toxicity/</link>
    <comments>http://ecochildsplay.com/2009/02/27/700-new-chemicals-introduced-each-year-not-tested-for-toxicity/#comments</comments>
    <pubDate>Fri, 27 Feb 2009 17:33:34 +0000</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Jennifer Lance</dc:creator>
    
		<category><![CDATA[Health]]></category>

    <guid isPermaLink="false">http://ecochildsplay.com/2009/02/27/700-new-chemicals-introduced-each-year-not-tested-for-toxicity/</guid>
    <description><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://ecochildsplay.com/files/2009/02/toxic_chemical_vessel.jpg"><img class="alignright size-full wp-image-3221" src="http://go635254.s3.amazonaws.com/ecochildsplay/files/2009/02/toxic_chemical_vessel.jpg" alt="toxic chemicals are not tested under TSCA" width="200" height="74" /></a>Sometimes I feel like an idiot for trusting the American government to protect our children. I mean really, I should know better by now.  I had just assumed any new chemical introduced into the US market would be tested for toxicity:  NOT TRUE!</p>
<h3>The <a href="http://www.ens-newswire.com/ens/feb2009/2009-02-26-10.asp" target="_blank">Toxic Substances Control Act (TSCA)</a> does not require chemical companies to test the 700 new chemicals introduced into the US market annually for their toxicity.  This law is so bad the EPA has not even been able to ban the known carcinogen asbestos under TSCA after 10 years of trying!</h3>
<p><a href="http://ecochildsplay.com/2009/02/27/700-new-chemicals-introduced-each-year-not-tested-for-toxicity/" class="more-link">Read more of this story &#187;</a></p>
]]></description>
    <wfw:commentRss>http://ecochildsplay.com/2009/02/27/700-new-chemicals-introduced-each-year-not-tested-for-toxicity/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>How Prepared is Your Family?</title>
    <link>http://ecochildsplay.com/2008/09/12/how-prepared-is-your-family/</link>
    <comments>http://ecochildsplay.com/2008/09/12/how-prepared-is-your-family/#comments</comments>
    <pubDate>Fri, 12 Sep 2008 14:40:22 +0000</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Derek Markham</dc:creator>
    
		<category><![CDATA[Health]]></category>

    <guid isPermaLink="false">http://ecochildsplay.com/2008/09/12/how-prepared-is-your-family/</guid>
    <description><![CDATA[<h3><img class="alignright size-full wp-image-1594" src="http://go635254.s3.amazonaws.com/ecochildsplay/files/2008/09/evacuation250.jpg" alt="Emergency Evacuation" width="250" height="333" />Do you have an emergency preparedness kit for your family?</h3>
<p>Don&#8217;t get caught short in the event of a natural disaster! Floods, hurricanes, earthquakes, fires, or severe winter storms can put your family at risk if you aren&#8217;t prepared. Trying to cope with having no power or water can be a stressful time, but there are steps that you can take to be prepared.</p>
<p>September is <strong>National Emergency Preparedness Month</strong>, and FEMA recommends having a kit ready in case of a disaster or evacuation. Going to the store and shopping during an evacuation will probably not be an option, so start putting together your family&#8217;s emergency preparedness kit, starting with the basics:
<p><a href="http://ecochildsplay.com/2008/09/12/how-prepared-is-your-family/" class="more-link">Read more of this story &#187;</a></p>
]]></description>
    <wfw:commentRss>http://ecochildsplay.com/2008/09/12/how-prepared-is-your-family/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>Contaminants in Flood Waters Threaten Food Part I: Who is Watching?</title>
    <link>http://planetsave.com/blog/2008/06/23/contaminants-in-flood-waters-threaten-food-part-i-who-is-watching/</link>
    <comments>http://planetsave.com/blog/2008/06/23/contaminants-in-flood-waters-threaten-food-part-i-who-is-watching/#comments</comments>
    <pubDate>Mon, 23 Jun 2008 23:03:34 +0000</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Sarah Pressman Lovinger</dc:creator>
    
		<category><![CDATA[Action &amp; Activism]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Water]]></category>

    <guid isPermaLink="false">http://planetsave.com/blog/2008/06/23/contaminants-in-flood-waters-threaten-food-part-i-who-is-watching/</guid>
    <description><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://planetsave.com/files/2008/06/floodedfarm1.jpg"><img class="alignleft size-full wp-image-2614" src="http://go635254.s3.amazonaws.com/planetsave/files/2008/06/floodedfarm1.jpg" alt="" width="414" height="138" /></a>Farming near a river bed is a great idea until it floods.  Soil near riverbeds tends to be more fertile, producing more abundant crops.  But when the river beds flood and drench contiguous farm land, the water can drag unwanted contaminants to the farmland, exposing health risks to anyone eating the crops from the flooded land.  What kinds of contaminants?  Anything in the flooded water: machine oil, sewage, garbage, medical waste, manure.</p>
<p><a href="http://planetsave.com/blog/2008/06/23/contaminants-in-flood-waters-threaten-food-part-i-who-is-watching/" class="more-link">Read more of this story &#187;</a></p>
]]></description>
    <wfw:commentRss>http://planetsave.com/blog/2008/06/23/contaminants-in-flood-waters-threaten-food-part-i-who-is-watching/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>Year Three in Rebuilding New Orleans: Taking More Green Steps, One by One</title>
    <link>http://ecolocalizer.com/2008/06/02/year-three-in-rebuilding-new-orleans-taking-more-green-steps-one-by-one/</link>
    <comments>http://ecolocalizer.com/2008/06/02/year-three-in-rebuilding-new-orleans-taking-more-green-steps-one-by-one/#comments</comments>
    <pubDate>Mon, 02 Jun 2008 15:58:59 +0000</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Shirley Siluk Gregory</dc:creator>
    
		<category><![CDATA[Louisiana]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[New Orleans]]></category>

    <guid isPermaLink="false">http://ecolocalizer.com/2008/06/02/year-three-in-rebuilding-new-orleans-taking-more-green-steps-one-by-one/</guid>
    <description><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://go635254.s3.amazonaws.com/ecolocalizer/files/2008/06/katrina-fridge.jpg" alt="A discarded fridge sits outside a New Orleans home after Hurricane Katrina and the levee failures. (Image credit: Infrogmation at Wikimedia Commons under a GNU Free Documentation license.)" />The post-Katrina rebuilding effort in New Orleans has a long way to go, but some residents, activists and volunteers are celebrating one small but noteworthy step after another toward a more sustainable city.</p>
<p>Their efforts take on a special poignancy with the start of yet another hurricane season (it officially began on June 1, though the tropical system Arthur formed a day early around the Yucatan Peninsula). With lingering La Niña conditions and water temperatures in parts of the Gulf of Mexico already a degree or two above average, there&#8217;s reason to be concerned.</p>
<p><a href="http://ecolocalizer.com/2008/06/02/year-three-in-rebuilding-new-orleans-taking-more-green-steps-one-by-one/" class="more-link">Read more of this story &#187;</a></p>
]]></description>
    <wfw:commentRss>http://ecolocalizer.com/2008/06/02/year-three-in-rebuilding-new-orleans-taking-more-green-steps-one-by-one/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
  </item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- 197 queries in 0.643 seconds. -->