<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
  xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
  xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
  >

<channel>
  <title>Green Options &#187; film art</title>
  <link>http://greenoptions.com/tag/film-art</link>
  <description>Posts tagged 'film art'</description>
  <pubDate>Thu, 24 Jul 2008 10:43:14 +0000</pubDate>
  <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
  <language>en</language>
  <item>
    <title>An Inconvenient Truth: When Film Art and Climate Change Clashed in a Swindle</title>
    <link>http://ecoworldly.com/2008/07/24/an-inconvenient-truth-when-film-art-and-climate-change-clashed-in-a-swindle/</link>
    <comments>http://ecoworldly.com/2008/07/24/an-inconvenient-truth-when-film-art-and-climate-change-clashed-in-a-swindle/#comments</comments>
    <pubDate>Thu, 24 Jul 2008 10:43:14 +0000</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Sam Aola Ooko</dc:creator>
    
		<category><![CDATA[In Europe]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[In Global]]></category>

    <guid isPermaLink="false">http://ecoworldly.com/2008/07/24/an-inconvenient-truth-when-film-art-and-climate-change-clashed-in-a-swindle/</guid>
    <description><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://ecoworldly.com/files/2008/07/global-warming-swindle-image1.jpg"><img class="alignnone size-full wp-image-1355" src="http://go635254.s3.amazonaws.com/ecoworldly/files/2008/07/global-warming-swindle-image1.jpg" alt="Wag TV" width="150" height="210" /></a>The British Media regulator, Office of Communications or Ofcom has <a href="http://www.ofcom.org.uk/tv/obb/prog_cb/obb114/">affirmed</a> that <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Great_Global_Warming_Swindle">a documentary</a> on UK&#8217;s <a href="http://www.channel4.com/">Channel 4</a> last year debunking Al Gore&#8217;s <a href="http://www.climatecrisis.net/aboutthefilm/">An Inconvenient Truth</a> and the theory about human influence on climate change was out of touch with reality.</p>
<p>The watchdog this week ruled <a href="https://www.wagtv.com/product/The-Great-Global-Warming-Swindle-322.html">The Great Global Warming Swindle</a> unfairly portrays several scientists and the <a href="http://www.ipcc.ch/">Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change</a>, and that it broke rules in the Broadcasting Code.</p>
<p>Ofcom’s investigation found that the IPCC, the former government chief scientist, <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/David_King_(scientist)">Sir David King</a>, and <a href="http://puddle.mit.edu/~cwunsch/">Professor Carl</a> <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Carl_Wunsch">Wunsch</a>, were treated unfairly in the documentary that attempted to use a cast of the world&#8217;s top scientists to debunk the global warming theory.</p>
<p><a href="http://ecoworldly.com/2008/07/24/an-inconvenient-truth-when-film-art-and-climate-change-clashed-in-a-swindle/" class="more-link">Read more of this story &#187;</a></p>
]]></description>
    <wfw:commentRss>http://ecoworldly.com/2008/07/24/an-inconvenient-truth-when-film-art-and-climate-change-clashed-in-a-swindle/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
  </item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- 95 queries in 0.292 seconds. -->