<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
  xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
  xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
  >

<channel>
  <title>Green Options &#187; fossil fuels</title>
  <link>http://greenoptions.com/tag/fossil-fuels</link>
  <description>Posts tagged 'fossil fuels'</description>
  <pubDate>Wed, 04 Nov 2009 21:46:34 +0000</pubDate>
  <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
  <language>en</language>
  <item>
    <title>Research Findings Throw Some Doubt Into Theory of Peak Oil</title>
    <link>http://gas2.org/2009/11/04/research-findings-throw-some-doubt-into-theory-of-peak-oil/</link>
    <comments>http://gas2.org/2009/11/04/research-findings-throw-some-doubt-into-theory-of-peak-oil/#comments</comments>
    <pubDate>Wed, 04 Nov 2009 21:46:34 +0000</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Nick Chambers</dc:creator>
    
		<category><![CDATA[Fossil fuels]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Oil]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Science]]></category>

    <guid isPermaLink="false">http://gas2.org/2009/11/04/research-findings-throw-some-doubt-into-theory-of-peak-oil/</guid>
    <description><![CDATA[<p style="text-align: center"><img class="alignnone size-full wp-image-4004 aligncenter" src="http://go635254.s3.amazonaws.com/gas2/files/2009/11/oil_pump.jpg" alt="" width="500" height="281" /></p>

<p>In 1877 Russian scientist Dimitri Mendeelev suggested that the large deposits of oil and gas we find under the surface of the Earth could be made without the decay of long-dead organisms in a process called abiotic synthesis of methane.</p>
<p>Since then the theory has been relegated to the back shelf due to a lack of evidence and the prevailing conventional wisdom that all deep oil and gas deposits arise from decaying prehistoric animal and plant material.</p>
<p>While it&#8217;s no doubt that the decay of dead animals and plants is one pathway to the creation of Earth&#8217;s oil and natural gas deposits (potentially the largest), <a href="http://www.eurekalert.org/pub_releases/2009-11/acs-nes110409.php" target="_blank">new research</a> done with high-tech equipment simulating the conditions of deep earth suggests that Mendeelev&#8217;s theory is correct.</p>
<p><a href="http://gas2.org/2009/11/04/research-findings-throw-some-doubt-into-theory-of-peak-oil/" class="more-link">Read more of this story &#187;</a></p>
]]></description>
    <wfw:commentRss>http://gas2.org/2009/11/04/research-findings-throw-some-doubt-into-theory-of-peak-oil/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>Hawaii Follows California with a Renewable Energy Feed-in Tariff</title>
    <link>http://cleantechnica.com/2009/10/30/hawaii-follows-california-with-a-renewable-energy-feed-in-tariff/</link>
    <comments>http://cleantechnica.com/2009/10/30/hawaii-follows-california-with-a-renewable-energy-feed-in-tariff/#comments</comments>
    <pubDate>Fri, 30 Oct 2009 22:43:46 +0000</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Zachary Shahan</dc:creator>
    
		<category><![CDATA[alternative energy]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[policy]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[solar energy]]></category>

    <guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/2009/10/30/hawaii-follows-california-with-a-renewable-energy-feed-in-tariff/</guid>
    <description><![CDATA[<p><a href='http://cleantechnica.com/files/2009/10/hawaii2.jpg'><img src="http://go635254.s3.amazonaws.com/cleantechnica/files/2009/10/hawaii2.jpg" alt="" width="500" height="331" class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-3838" /></a><br />
Earlier this month, <a href="http://cleantechnica.com/2009/10/14/new-california-bill-gives-more-money-to-small-scale-solar-projects/">Governor Schwarzenegger signed legislation</a> to buy solar power from relatively small private generators for rates above market value. Hawaii is next in line with this <a href="http://cleantechnica.com/2009/06/22/is-a-feed-in-tariff-a-good-fit-for-the-us/">European-style tariff</a> &#8212; the Hawaii Public Utilities Commission and <a href="http://www.fit-hawaii.com/?FIT_proceedings_in_Hawaii">Governor Lingle</a> just recently <strong>set a similar initiative for Hawaii</strong>.</p>
<p>Hawaii&#8217;s initiative will make it possible for homeowners and businesses to sell power they generate from small to medium-scale renewable energy projects (i.e. <a href="http://cleantechnica.com/2008/02/07/how-to-cheap-or-free-solar-panels/">solar panels</a>) to Hawaii&#8217;s main power producers at higher than market-value rates.</p>
<p><a href="http://cleantechnica.com/2009/10/30/hawaii-follows-california-with-a-renewable-energy-feed-in-tariff/" class="more-link">Read more of this story &#187;</a></p>
]]></description>
    <wfw:commentRss>http://cleantechnica.com/2009/10/30/hawaii-follows-california-with-a-renewable-energy-feed-in-tariff/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>Wind Turbines Don&#8217;t Kill Birds; Coal Plants Do</title>
    <link>http://cleantechnica.com/2009/10/28/wind-turbines-dont-kill-birds-coal-plants-do/</link>
    <comments>http://cleantechnica.com/2009/10/28/wind-turbines-dont-kill-birds-coal-plants-do/#comments</comments>
    <pubDate>Thu, 29 Oct 2009 01:38:41 +0000</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Susan Kraemer</dc:creator>
    
		<category><![CDATA[Climate Change]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Media]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[fossil fuels]]></category>

    <guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/2009/10/28/wind-turbines-dont-kill-birds-coal-plants-do/</guid>
    <description><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://ecoworldly.com/files/2009/10/turbine_desert.jpg"><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-4560" src="http://ecoworldly.com/files/2009/10/turbine_desert.jpg" alt="" width="500" height="363" /></a></p>
<p>A very detailed and complex study (pdf) <a href="http://www1.eere.energy.gov/windandhydro/pdfs/41869.pdf">Increasing Wind Energy&#8217;s Contribution to the US Electricity Supply</a> weighing the costs and benefits of increasing wind power to 20% by 2030 included some very interesting projections on bird extinction numbers expected from climate change.</p>
<p>While it may not be news to cleantechnica readers that climate change will kill more members of more species than wind turbines, it is interesting to see the actual figures comparing bird loss from climate change versus from wind turbines.</p>
<p>The study found at least 950 entire species of terrestrial birds that will be threatened with extinction as a result of climate change under several scenarios, even at the lower estimate of temperature gains, just counting species of non-sea birds in the higher latitudes; outside the tropics.</p>
<p><a href="http://cleantechnica.com/2009/10/28/wind-turbines-dont-kill-birds-coal-plants-do/" class="more-link">Read more of this story &#187;</a></p>
]]></description>
    <wfw:commentRss>http://cleantechnica.com/2009/10/28/wind-turbines-dont-kill-birds-coal-plants-do/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>First Polio, Now Mercury: World Unites Against Global Health Threat</title>
    <link>http://cleantechnica.com/2009/10/24/first-polio-now-mercury-world-unites-against-global-health-threat/</link>
    <comments>http://cleantechnica.com/2009/10/24/first-polio-now-mercury-world-unites-against-global-health-threat/#comments</comments>
    <pubDate>Sat, 24 Oct 2009 11:31:02 +0000</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Tina Casey</dc:creator>
    
		<category><![CDATA[fossil fuels]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[health]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[policy]]></category>

    <guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/2009/10/24/first-polio-now-mercury-world-unites-against-global-health-threat/</guid>
    <description><![CDATA[<p><a rel="attachment wp-att-3796" href="http://cleantechnica.com/2009/10/24/first-polio-now-mercury-world-unites-against-global-health-threat/new-global-push-to-reduce-mercury-emissions-under-way/"><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-3796" src="http://go635254.s3.amazonaws.com/cleantechnica/files/2009/10/new-global-push-to-reduce-mercury-emissions-under-way.jpg" alt="Mercury is a neurotoxin that makes its way into the food chain from coal power plant emissions and other sources." width="491" height="367" /></a></p>
<p><strong>Mercury</strong> pollution is next on the list of global health threats to face concentrated action with the goal of elimination.  According to <a title="pr newswire press release from zero mercury working group" href="http://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/zero-mercury-working-group-world-governments-move-towards-global-treaty-on-mercury-65783602.html" target="_blank">Zero Mercury Working Group</a>, yesterday the first significant steps toward a binding treaty to control mercury pollution were announced at a United Nations Environmental Program meeting in Bangkok, Thailand, in advance of negotiations that will take place in Stockholm next summer.</p>

<p>The global nature of <a title="zero mercury working group official website" href="http://www.zeromercury.org/about_us/zeroHgWG.html" target="_blank">mercury pollution</a> lies in its ability to travel long distances from its point of emission through the food chain.  In fish it accumulates in its most toxic form, methylmercury.  Zero Mercury hopes to achieve a treaty by 2013 that promotes more <strong>sustainable</strong> alternatives to mercury in products and industrial processes, with the broad goal of addressing all controllable emissions of mercury in the environment.</p>
<p><a href="http://cleantechnica.com/2009/10/24/first-polio-now-mercury-world-unites-against-global-health-threat/" class="more-link">Read more of this story &#187;</a></p>
]]></description>
    <wfw:commentRss>http://cleantechnica.com/2009/10/24/first-polio-now-mercury-world-unites-against-global-health-threat/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>$25 Billion for Imported Oil &#8212; In One Month!</title>
    <link>http://cleantechnica.com/2009/10/19/25-billion-for-imported-oil-in-one-month/</link>
    <comments>http://cleantechnica.com/2009/10/19/25-billion-for-imported-oil-in-one-month/#comments</comments>
    <pubDate>Mon, 19 Oct 2009 15:48:31 +0000</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Zachary Shahan</dc:creator>
    
		<category><![CDATA[alternative energy]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[alternative fuels]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[fossil fuels]]></category>

    <guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/2009/10/19/25-billion-for-imported-oil-in-one-month/</guid>
    <description><![CDATA[<p><a href='http://cleantechnica.com/files/2009/10/oil.jpg'><img src="http://go635254.s3.amazonaws.com/cleantechnica/files/2009/10/oil.jpg" alt="" width="500" height="360" class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-3761" /></a><br />
That is correct &#8212; not million but <strong>billion</strong>, not in one year but in <strong>one month</strong>! That is how much the US spent on imported oil in September 2009.</p>
<p>For those concerned about the US economy or national security risks, T. Boone Pickens and data from the US Department of Energy’s Energy Information Administration (EIA) show us that foreign oil imports should be at the top of our list. We rely very heavily on foreign oil and send a good chunk of our money to other countries to supply us with that oil &#8212; $25 billion last month alone!</p>
<p>Take a closer look.</p>
<p><a href="http://cleantechnica.com/2009/10/19/25-billion-for-imported-oil-in-one-month/" class="more-link">Read more of this story &#187;</a></p>
]]></description>
    <wfw:commentRss>http://cleantechnica.com/2009/10/19/25-billion-for-imported-oil-in-one-month/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>EPA Warning Could Mark Beginning of the End for Mountaintop Removal</title>
    <link>http://cleantechnica.com/2009/10/18/epa-warning-could-mark-beginning-of-the-end-for-mountaintop-removal/</link>
    <comments>http://cleantechnica.com/2009/10/18/epa-warning-could-mark-beginning-of-the-end-for-mountaintop-removal/#comments</comments>
    <pubDate>Sun, 18 Oct 2009 18:13:55 +0000</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Tina Casey</dc:creator>
    
		<category><![CDATA[fossil fuels]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[green jobs]]></category>

    <guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/2009/10/18/epa-warning-could-mark-beginning-of-the-end-for-mountaintop-removal/</guid>
    <description><![CDATA[<p><a rel="attachment wp-att-3750" href="http://cleantechnica.com/2009/10/18/epa-warning-could-mark-beginning-of-the-end-for-mountaintop-removal/mountaintop-removal-a-controversial-coal-mining-practice/"><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-3750" src="http://go635254.s3.amazonaws.com/cleantechnica/files/2009/10/mountaintop-removal-a-controversial-coal-mining-practice.jpg" alt="The U.S. EPA has warned Mingo Coal that it may veto its application to expand mountaintop removal in West Virginia." width="500" height="375" /></a></p>
<p><strong>Mountaintop removal</strong>, the hyper-destructive practice of blowing up entire mountains to get at coal near the surface, is in for a rough ride.  Though in technological terms mountaintop removal is downright third-world compared to the <a title="new solar disk technology by SunCatcher" href="http://cleantechnica.com/2009/07/19/new-suncatcher-solar-dish-spells-relief-for-rust-belt/" target="_blank">high tech sustainable energy industry</a>, it&#8217;s still been going nonstop right here in the <strong>Appalachian</strong> mountains of our own northeastern U.S..  The result has been hundreds of mountains destroyed in one of North America&#8217;s richest ecosystems, hundreds of miles of streams buried, and an <a title="counties with mountaintop removal are among the weakest economices in their home states, and in the U.S." href="http://cleantechnica.com/2009/07/12/new-study-lifts-the-curtain-on-clean-coal/" target="_blank">economic and public health climate</a> that is among the worst in the nation.  Now all that is poised to end.  Earlier this year the <a title="U.S. EPS suspends mountaintop coal mining permits" href="http://planetsave.com/blog/2009/03/24/epa-stops-mountaintop-removal-waterways-still-not-safe/" target="_blank">U.S. EPA</a> suspended the mountaintop removal permitting process and <a title="Raw Story reports immanent revocation of Spruce No. 1 mine" href="http://rawstory.com/2009/10/epa-deny-permit-infamous-coal/" target="_blank">Raw Story</a> is now reporting that the first permit veto is immanent.</p>

<p>According to Raw reporter Joe Byrne, the Mingo Logan Coal Company was notified this past Friday by the EPA that the mountaintop removal permit in the pipeline for its Spruce No. 1 mine in West Virginia faces a veto due to &#8220;a high potential for downstream water quality excursions under current mining and valley fill practices.&#8221;  With financial backers like <a title="Bank of America divests from mountaintop removal" href="http://redgreenandblue.org/2008/12/05/bank-of-america-divests-from-mountaintop-removal/" target="_blank">Bank of America</a> cutting their ties with companies that practice mountaintop mining, the impending veto could be a harbinger of more to come.</p>
<p><a href="http://cleantechnica.com/2009/10/18/epa-warning-could-mark-beginning-of-the-end-for-mountaintop-removal/" class="more-link">Read more of this story &#187;</a></p>
]]></description>
    <wfw:commentRss>http://cleantechnica.com/2009/10/18/epa-warning-could-mark-beginning-of-the-end-for-mountaintop-removal/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>Landfill Biogas - The Rodney Dangerfield of Renewable Power</title>
    <link>http://cleantechnica.com/2009/10/17/landfill-biogas-the-rodney-dangerfield-of-renewable-power/</link>
    <comments>http://cleantechnica.com/2009/10/17/landfill-biogas-the-rodney-dangerfield-of-renewable-power/#comments</comments>
    <pubDate>Sun, 18 Oct 2009 02:54:04 +0000</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Susan Kraemer</dc:creator>
    
		<category><![CDATA[fossil fuels]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[waste reduction]]></category>

    <guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/2009/10/17/landfill-biogas-the-rodney-dangerfield-of-renewable-power/</guid>
    <description><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://cleantechnica.com/files/2009/10/landfill_biogas_company_grows_47_percent.jpg"><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-3741" src="http://go635254.s3.amazonaws.com/cleantechnica/files/2009/10/landfill_biogas_company_grows_47_percent.jpg" alt="" width="500" height="437" /></a></p>
<p>Some of the landfill gas at McCarty Road Landfill in Texas was captured for sale to a local utility, but the rest was just getting flared. Now, though, <a href="http://www.ameresco.com/" target="_blank">Ameresco Services</a> captures that excess and sends it four miles through an underground pipeline to Anheuser-Busch brewery to meet their goal of getting  <a href="http://cleantechnica.com/2008/07/30/anheuser-busch-unveils-massive-green-beer-plan/" target="_blank">15 percent of their needs by 2010</a> promised a few years ago.</p>
<p>How much business is there to be made in capturing and using waste energy? Well, the company that developed the energy recycling waste-to-power system that helps fuel the biopower plant at the brewery has got to be <strong>one of the few </strong>companies in this economy to enjoy <a href="http://www.metrowestdailynews.com/business/x366052173/Framingham-firm-specializes-in-energy-efficiency-projects" target="_blank"><strong>47% growth over the last 5 years!</strong></a></p>
<p><a href="http://cleantechnica.com/2009/10/17/landfill-biogas-the-rodney-dangerfield-of-renewable-power/" class="more-link">Read more of this story &#187;</a></p>
]]></description>
    <wfw:commentRss>http://cleantechnica.com/2009/10/17/landfill-biogas-the-rodney-dangerfield-of-renewable-power/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>Study: Electric Cars Produce 30% More Emissions Than Ethanol Cars</title>
    <link>http://gas2.org/2009/10/14/study-electric-cars-produce-30-more-emissions-than-ethanol-cars/</link>
    <comments>http://gas2.org/2009/10/14/study-electric-cars-produce-30-more-emissions-than-ethanol-cars/#comments</comments>
    <pubDate>Wed, 14 Oct 2009 22:02:27 +0000</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Nick Chambers</dc:creator>
    
		<category><![CDATA[Carbon Emissions]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Electric Cars (EVs)]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Ethanol]]></category>

    <guid isPermaLink="false">http://gas2.org/2009/10/14/study-electric-cars-produce-30-more-emissions-than-ethanol-cars/</guid>
    <description><![CDATA[<p style="text-align: center"><img class="alignnone size-full wp-image-1317 aligncenter" src="http://go635254.s3.amazonaws.com/gas2/files/2008/11/e85_flex_fuel.jpg" alt="" width="500" height="303" /></p>

<p>An analysis done by <a href="http://www.biofuelsdigest.com/blog2/2009/10/14/vehicles-running-e85-corn-ethanol-have-30-percent-lower-co2-emissions-than-the-all-electric-tesla-roadster-study-finds/" target="_blank">Biofuels Digest</a> has come to the very surprising conclusion that an electric car will produce 30% more carbon dioxide emissions over its lifetime than a car powered by E85 corn ethanol. Not only that, the study also found that the same electric car will produce 21% more carbon dioxide than even a gasoline powered car.</p>
<p>These claims assume that 100% of the electricity for the EV comes from coal-fired power plants and that a comparable car would get 35 mpg—both of which seem like unrealistic assumptions. So I dug around the internet today to try and come up with more realistic numbers.</p>
<p><a href="http://gas2.org/2009/10/14/study-electric-cars-produce-30-more-emissions-than-ethanol-cars/" class="more-link">Read more of this story &#187;</a></p>
]]></description>
    <wfw:commentRss>http://gas2.org/2009/10/14/study-electric-cars-produce-30-more-emissions-than-ethanol-cars/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>Ormat Supplies Recovered Energy Generation To DOE Oilfield Geothermal Test</title>
    <link>http://cleantechnica.com/2009/10/11/ormat-supplies-recovered-energy-generation-to-doe-oilfield/</link>
    <comments>http://cleantechnica.com/2009/10/11/ormat-supplies-recovered-energy-generation-to-doe-oilfield/#comments</comments>
    <pubDate>Sun, 11 Oct 2009 23:16:26 +0000</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Susan Kraemer</dc:creator>
    
		<category><![CDATA[alternative energy]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[fossil fuels]]></category>

    <guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/2009/10/11/ormat-supplies-recovered-energy-generation-to-doe-oilfield/</guid>
    <description><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://cleantechnica.com/files/2009/10/ormat_geothermal.jpg"><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-3662" src="http://go635254.s3.amazonaws.com/cleantechnica/files/2009/10/ormat_geothermal.jpg" alt="" width="500" height="373" /></a><br />
Recovered energy generation produces electricity from heat that would otherwise be thrown away. This &#8220;geothermal&#8221; energy technology would lower carbon emissions on oil fields and from cement makers, two of the three major carbon emitters to be covered by <a href="http://kerry.senate.gov/cleanenergyjobsandamericanpower/pdf/SectionbySectionSummary.pdf" target="_blank">CEJAPA</a> energy legislation. The potential is for 5,000 MW of electricity to be harvested, and CO2 reduced; just from oil drilling operations in this country.</p>

<p>I contacted Jim Nations at the Rocky Mountain Oilfield Testing Center, who was kind enough to give me some additional details on the tests that I wrote about last week. The DOE testing is being carried out on a 10,000 acre oil field with over 1,000 well bores to extract geothermal energy from the byproduct of oil drilling (hot water), using a 250 KW  <a href="http://www.ormat.com/news.php?did=137&#38;aid=685e6a781e2836f438f80bb85bed6a41" target="_blank">Ormat</a> recovered energy generator unit (pictured above).</p>
<p>The power system comprises a commercial standard design Ormat <a href="http://www.wapa.gov/es/pubs/esb/2009/aug/aug094.htm" target="_blank">Organic Rankine Cycle</a> power plant. The binary power unit uses produced hot water as the heating fluid for a heat exchanger in the <a href="http://www.ormat.com/businesses.php?did=26" target="_blank">Ormat Energy Converter</a>, where a secondary working fluid, an organic fluid with a low boiling point, is vaporized. That vapor is then used to spin a turbine coupled to a generator to produce electricity.</p>
<p>Jim&#8217;s answers, over the jump:</p>
<p><a href="http://cleantechnica.com/2009/10/11/ormat-supplies-recovered-energy-generation-to-doe-oilfield/" class="more-link">Read more of this story &#187;</a></p>
]]></description>
    <wfw:commentRss>http://cleantechnica.com/2009/10/11/ormat-supplies-recovered-energy-generation-to-doe-oilfield/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>90% of Coal Plant CO2 Captured in 12-Month Test</title>
    <link>http://cleantechnica.com/2009/10/09/90-of-coal-plant-co2-captured-in-12-month-test/</link>
    <comments>http://cleantechnica.com/2009/10/09/90-of-coal-plant-co2-captured-in-12-month-test/#comments</comments>
    <pubDate>Fri, 09 Oct 2009 23:35:09 +0000</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Susan Kraemer</dc:creator>
    
		<category><![CDATA[carbon emissions]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[fossil fuels]]></category>

    <guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/2009/10/09/90-of-coal-plant-co2-captured-in-12-month-test/</guid>
    <description><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://cleantechnica.com/files/2009/10/alstrom_co2_capture.jpg"><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-3648" src="http://go635254.s3.amazonaws.com/cleantechnica/files/2009/10/alstrom_co2_capture.jpg" alt="" width="500" height="423" /></a><br />
One year ago the French company Alstom <a href="http://www.alstom.com/pr_corp_v2/2008/corp/49200.EN.php?languageId=EN&#38;dir=/pr_corp_v2/2008/corp/&#38;idRubriqueCourante=23132">began a year-long US test</a> of capturing CO2 from the water+carbon-dioxide mix created using their chilled-ammonia technology, in the smokestack of the Pleasant Prairie Power Plant in Wisconsin.</p>
<p> This week the year&#8217;s results were announced. The years average CO2 capture rate was 90%, according to a joint announcement from the EPRI, We Energies and Alstom to the Society of Environmental Journalists.</p>
<p><a href="http://cleantechnica.com/2009/10/09/90-of-coal-plant-co2-captured-in-12-month-test/" class="more-link">Read more of this story &#187;</a></p>
]]></description>
    <wfw:commentRss>http://cleantechnica.com/2009/10/09/90-of-coal-plant-co2-captured-in-12-month-test/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>Why Wind Storage Worth Trillions</title>
    <link>http://cleantechnica.com/2009/10/05/why-wind-storage-worth-trillions/</link>
    <comments>http://cleantechnica.com/2009/10/05/why-wind-storage-worth-trillions/#comments</comments>
    <pubDate>Mon, 05 Oct 2009 14:55:18 +0000</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Susan Kraemer</dc:creator>
    
		<category><![CDATA[business]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[fossil fuels]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[wind energy]]></category>

    <guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/2009/10/05/why-wind-storage-worth-trillions/</guid>
    <description><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://cleantechnica.com/files/2009/10/trillions_to_be-made.jpg"><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-3570" src="http://go635254.s3.amazonaws.com/cleantechnica/files/2009/10/trillions_to_be-made.jpg" alt="" width="500" height="327" /></a></p>
<h3>Coal power is not base-load electricity by itself. To enable coal to reliably deliver electric power, it took the creation of an entire other national infrastructure; the trans-continental railroad system.</h3>
<p>Without the unceasing rail-car-load delivery, every 12 hours, on the hour, hour after hour, day after day, week after week, year after year, of every next 12-hour-supply of fuel for the fire; the fire would go out, the water wouldn&#8217;t boil, the steam wouldn&#8217;t rise, the turbine wouldn&#8217;t turn; the next 12 hours of electricity wouldn&#8217;t be made. The fire must never go out.</p>
<p><strong>Coal plus railroad =</strong><strong> base-load power</strong><strong></strong>.</p>
<p>Even today, a century later, every 12 hours in this nation a trainload of coal from Wyoming or Pennsylvania or Ohio, <strong>must</strong> arrive at an electric power station near your city, to make your coal power for the next 12 hours. No trainload of coal; no coal power. What does that have to do with wind storage?</p>
<h3>Wind plus storage = base-load power.</h3>
<p><a href="http://cleantechnica.com/2009/10/05/why-wind-storage-worth-trillions/" class="more-link">Read more of this story &#187;</a></p>
]]></description>
    <wfw:commentRss>http://cleantechnica.com/2009/10/05/why-wind-storage-worth-trillions/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>DOE Introduces Big Oil to New Energy Source: Waste Heat Geothermal</title>
    <link>http://cleantechnica.com/2009/10/04/doe-introduces-big-oil-to-new-energy-source-waste-heat-geothermal/</link>
    <comments>http://cleantechnica.com/2009/10/04/doe-introduces-big-oil-to-new-energy-source-waste-heat-geothermal/#comments</comments>
    <pubDate>Sun, 04 Oct 2009 14:18:02 +0000</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Susan Kraemer</dc:creator>
    
		<category><![CDATA[carbon emissions]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[fossil fuels]]></category>

    <guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/2009/10/04/doe-introduces-big-oil-to-new-energy-source-waste-heat-geothermal/</guid>
    <description><![CDATA[<h3><a href="http://cleantechnica.com/files/2009/10/steven_chu_renewable_energy.jpg"><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-3575" src="http://go635254.s3.amazonaws.com/cleantechnica/files/2009/10/steven_chu_renewable_energy.jpg" alt="" width="500" height="369" /></a><br />
Every barrel of oil extracted in the US also produces ten barrels of hot fluids in addition to the oil. Why not use that potential energy in the waste heat?</h3>
<p>Rather than discard that &#8220;geothermal&#8221; resource created by the process of oil extraction, the DOE is going to show the traditional energy industry how to tap into those waste fluids to power equipment at the site.</p>
<p>The renewable energy division (EERE) of Steven Chu&#8217;s energetic new Department of Energy is buying the waste heat geothermal unit from <a href="http://www.ormat.com/" target="_blank">Ormat Technologies</a> to do the demo. Ormat makes both geothermal and <a href="http://www.ormat.com/businesses.php?did=26" target="_blank">combined heat and power</a> units.</p>
<p>The DOE&#8217;s <a href="http://www1.eere.energy.gov/geothermal/" target="_blank">Geothermal Technologies Program</a> at the Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) will collaborate with  Office of Fossil Energy to make low temperature geothermal power from waste drilling fluids using a waste heat geothermal unit.</p>
<p>The electricity produced would be used to power field production equipment, which would offset purchased electricity. Because this would reduce the fossil energy needed to extract each barrel of oil, this would reduce the pollution costs the traditional oil industry would be liable for under new legislation pending.</p>
<p>If the  <a href="http://kerry.senate.gov/cleanenergyjobsandamericanpower/pdf/SectionbySectionSummary.pdf" target="_blank">Clean Energy Jobs &#38; American Power Act</a> passes, there will be an incentive to reduce carbon pollution.</p>
<p><a href="http://cleantechnica.com/2009/10/04/doe-introduces-big-oil-to-new-energy-source-waste-heat-geothermal/" class="more-link">Read more of this story &#187;</a></p>
]]></description>
    <wfw:commentRss>http://cleantechnica.com/2009/10/04/doe-introduces-big-oil-to-new-energy-source-waste-heat-geothermal/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>Global Collapse, Human Survival &#38; the Planet&#8217;s Boundaries</title>
    <link>http://ecoworldly.com/2009/09/24/global-collapse-human-survival-the-planets-boundaries/</link>
    <comments>http://ecoworldly.com/2009/09/24/global-collapse-human-survival-the-planets-boundaries/#comments</comments>
    <pubDate>Thu, 24 Sep 2009 15:11:43 +0000</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Zachary Shahan</dc:creator>
    
		<category><![CDATA[About Environment]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[About Society]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[In Global]]></category>

    <guid isPermaLink="false">http://ecoworldly.com/2009/09/24/global-collapse-human-survival-the-planets-boundaries/</guid>
    <description><![CDATA[<p><a href='http://ecoworldly.com/files/2009/09/nature1.jpg'><img src="http://go635254.s3.amazonaws.com/ecoworldly/files/2009/09/nature1.jpg" alt="" width="334" height="500" class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-4062" /></a></p>
<h3><strong>A new study by nearly 30 of the world&#8217;s best scientists concludes that we have crossed three of the world&#8217;s nine thresholds. It is not only about climate change.</strong></h3>
<p><a href="http://ecoworldly.com/2009/09/24/global-collapse-human-survival-the-planets-boundaries/" class="more-link">Read more of this story &#187;</a></p>
]]></description>
    <wfw:commentRss>http://ecoworldly.com/2009/09/24/global-collapse-human-survival-the-planets-boundaries/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>Old King Coal&#8217;s New Nursery Rhyme (cartoon)</title>
    <link>http://redgreenandblue.org/2009/09/24/old-king-coals-new-nursery-rhyme/</link>
    <comments>http://redgreenandblue.org/2009/09/24/old-king-coals-new-nursery-rhyme/#comments</comments>
    <pubDate>Thu, 24 Sep 2009 12:13:40 +0000</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Joe Mohr</dc:creator>
    
		<category><![CDATA[Cartoons]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Leader]]></category>

    <guid isPermaLink="false">http://redgreenandblue.org/2009/09/24/old-king-coals-new-nursery-rhyme/</guid>
    <description><![CDATA[<p><strong>Mean Joe Green #74: Old King Coal&#8217;s New Nursery Rhyme.</strong><br />
Will we be able to move away from dirty fossil fuels to new clean energy sources in the near future? Not if Old King Coal has his way&#8230;<br />
<a href="http://redgreenandblue.org/files/2009/09/mjg074.jpg"><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-3620" src="http://go635254.s3.amazonaws.com/redgreenandblue/files/2009/09/mjg074.jpg" alt="" width="500" height="735" /></a></p>
<h3>Related Articles</h3>
<p><a href="http://redgreenandblue.org/2009/09/23/un-speeches-ramp-up-rhetoric-in-us-%e2%80%93-china-climate-change-arms-race/">UN Speeches Ramp Up Rhetoric in US – China Climate Change Arms Race</a><br />
<a href="http://www.grist.org/article/2009-09-22-fossil-fuel-subsidies-dwarf-clean-energy-subsidies-obama-wants/">Fossil fuel subsidies dwarf clean energy subsidies; Obama wants to eliminate them</a><br />
<a href="http://www.grist.org/article/2009-09-23-u.s.-pushes-g20-to-cut-fossil-fuel-subsidies/">U.S. pushes G20 to cut fossil-fuel subsidies</a><br />
<a href="http://www.treehugger.com/files/2009/07/ten-dirty-king-coal.php">Ten Dirty Things About Big King Coal</a><br />
<a href="http://www.treehugger.com/files/2009/06/bonnaroo-2009.php">Robert F. Kennedy, Jr. Talks Dirty Coal at Bonnaroo, and More (audio)</a></p>
<h3><a href="http://redgreenandblue.org/category/topics/cartoons-topics/">Mean Joe Green&#8217;s Cartoon Archive</a></h3>
<h3>Follow Mean Joe Green on Twitter <a href="http://twitter.com/GreenCartoons">@GreenCartoons</a></h3>
]]></description>
    <wfw:commentRss>http://redgreenandblue.org/2009/09/24/old-king-coals-new-nursery-rhyme/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>Coal Ditched for Natural Gas at US Power Plants</title>
    <link>http://cleantechnica.com/2009/09/22/coal-ditched-for-natural-gas-at-power-plants/</link>
    <comments>http://cleantechnica.com/2009/09/22/coal-ditched-for-natural-gas-at-power-plants/#comments</comments>
    <pubDate>Wed, 23 Sep 2009 01:56:07 +0000</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Susan Kraemer</dc:creator>
    
		<category><![CDATA[business]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[fossil fuels]]></category>

    <guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/2009/09/22/coal-ditched-for-natural-gas-at-power-plants/</guid>
    <description><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://cleantechnica.com/files/2009/09/wyoming_coal.jpg"><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-3468" src="http://go635254.s3.amazonaws.com/cleantechnica/files/2009/09/wyoming_coal.jpg" alt="" width="500" height="372" /></a><br />
Apparently many modern electric power plants that are coal powered can also use natural gas. So, when the price of natural gas came down in the US, more power stations <a href="http://seekingalpha.com/article/162361-fuel-substitution-power-plants-currently-switching-to-natural-gas?source=article_lb_articles">switched</a> to the cheaper fuel.</p>
<p>The result has been a sharp drop in coal use. Unused coal is piling up at power plants. About 175 million tons of coal inventory is now backed up. Inventory is up 26% over last year.</p>
<p>This national backlog is now beginning to back up into <a href="http://www.gillettenewsrecord.com/articles/2009/09/19/news/thursday/news02.txt">coal fields</a> too. Wyoming has a 6.5% drop in demand from utilities, especially in the Midwest. For the first time in 15 years, coal production has been slowed in Wyoming. And the future looks grim too.
<p><a href="http://cleantechnica.com/2009/09/22/coal-ditched-for-natural-gas-at-power-plants/" class="more-link">Read more of this story &#187;</a></p>
]]></description>
    <wfw:commentRss>http://cleantechnica.com/2009/09/22/coal-ditched-for-natural-gas-at-power-plants/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>Cap and Trade 101: How a &#8220;Cap&#8221; Ensures Carbon Reductions</title>
    <link>http://cleantechnica.com/2009/09/22/cap-and-trade-101-how-a-cap-ensures-carbon-reductions/</link>
    <comments>http://cleantechnica.com/2009/09/22/cap-and-trade-101-how-a-cap-ensures-carbon-reductions/#comments</comments>
    <pubDate>Tue, 22 Sep 2009 17:59:01 +0000</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Susan Kraemer</dc:creator>
    
		<category><![CDATA[carbon emissions]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[fossil fuels]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[politics]]></category>

    <guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/2009/09/22/cap-and-trade-101-how-a-cap-ensures-carbon-reductions/</guid>
    <description><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://cleantechnica.com/files/2009/09/european_cap_and_trade.jpg"><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-3448" src="http://go635254.s3.amazonaws.com/cleantechnica/files/2009/09/european_cap_and_trade.jpg" alt="" width="500" height="372" /></a><br />
Now that Cap and Trade is a possibility, there is a rising clamor for a carbon tax instead, from conservative thinktanks like the <a href="http://www.aei.org/article/26624" target="_blank">American Enterprise Institute,</a> outlets like <a title="A carbon tax is the surest way to fix prices, while cap-and-trade is the surest way to meet environmental goals" href="http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2009/apr/07/carbon-tax-touted-as-simpler/" target="_blank">The Washington Times</a> and even directly from <a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB123146091530566335.html" target="_blank">Exxon</a> itself. Yet when first introduced by Al Gore, in 1993, the carbon tax was anathema to the fossil industry. What makes a carbon tax now less of a threat than Cap and Trade? It&#8217;s the Cap.</p>
<p><strong>The key difference between Cap and Trade and a carbon tax is that a carbon tax controls just the <em>cost</em> of pollution - only a cap limits the <em>quantity</em>.</strong></p>
<h4>The &#8220;Cap&#8221; <em>limits</em> emissions by fossil companies</h4>
<p>The Cap in Cap and Trade is the only mechanism for ensuring a total <strong>limit</strong> to carbon emissions. A Cap is set for the fossil industries as a whole. The Cap on emissions at point-of-entry sources (oil pipelines, coal fields and coal-fired power stations) in the current Cap and Trade bill limits total carbon.</p>
<p><a href="http://cleantechnica.com/2009/09/22/cap-and-trade-101-how-a-cap-ensures-carbon-reductions/" class="more-link">Read more of this story &#187;</a></p>
]]></description>
    <wfw:commentRss>http://cleantechnica.com/2009/09/22/cap-and-trade-101-how-a-cap-ensures-carbon-reductions/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>Americans Cut Energy Use - By Moving West</title>
    <link>http://cleantechnica.com/2009/09/21/americans-cut-energy-use-by-moving-west/</link>
    <comments>http://cleantechnica.com/2009/09/21/americans-cut-energy-use-by-moving-west/#comments</comments>
    <pubDate>Mon, 21 Sep 2009 18:55:31 +0000</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Susan Kraemer</dc:creator>
    
		<category><![CDATA[Climate Change]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[energy efficiency]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[fossil fuels]]></category>

    <guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/2009/09/21/americans-cut-energy-use-by-moving-west/</guid>
    <description><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://cleantechnica.com/files/2009/09/moving_southwest.jpg"><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-3441" src="http://go635254.s3.amazonaws.com/cleantechnica/files/2009/09/moving_southwest.jpg" alt="" width="500" height="527" /></a></p>
<p>As a nation, we have been moving away from regions of the US with extremes of hot or cold, and towards the West and Southwest for about the last fifty years.</p>
<p>A new study has found that as a result, our average (per person) use of energy for heating and cooling has diminished, resulting in a reduction in combined energy demand over the last fifty years.</p>
<p><a href="http://cleantechnica.com/2009/09/21/americans-cut-energy-use-by-moving-west/" class="more-link">Read more of this story &#187;</a></p>
]]></description>
    <wfw:commentRss>http://cleantechnica.com/2009/09/21/americans-cut-energy-use-by-moving-west/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>Waxman-Markey Cap and Trade Will Pay For Itself, CBO Finds</title>
    <link>http://cleantechnica.com/2009/09/10/waxman-markey-cap-and-trade-will-pay-for-itself-cbo-finds/</link>
    <comments>http://cleantechnica.com/2009/09/10/waxman-markey-cap-and-trade-will-pay-for-itself-cbo-finds/#comments</comments>
    <pubDate>Thu, 10 Sep 2009 04:25:24 +0000</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Susan Kraemer</dc:creator>
    
		<category><![CDATA[alternative energy]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[carbon emissions]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[fossil fuels]]></category>

    <guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/2009/09/10/waxman-markey-cap-and-trade-will-pay-for-itself-cbo-finds/</guid>
    <description><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://cleantechnica.com/files/2009/09/industry.jpg"><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-3321" src="http://go635254.s3.amazonaws.com/cleantechnica/files/2009/09/industry.jpg" alt="" width="500" height="376" /></a><br />
The Waxman-Markey Climate Bill uses Cap and Trade to get our current 6 billion tons of CO2 a year down to just over 5 billion tons a year by 2020 (20% by 2020) and continuing down further by 2050.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.cbo.gov/ftpdocs/102xx/doc10262/hr2454.pdf" target="_blank">The Congressional Budget Office</a> has estimated that the auction proceeds of the current Cap and Trade bill would increase Federal revenues by about $846 billion by 2019.</p>
<p>That would more than fund the $821 billion in renewable energy spending that it will take (per the CBO) to reduce the national carbon footprint by almost a billion tons a year on deadline, and would leave $25 billion in the bank for additional renewable energy projects.</p>
<p>This revenue would fund programs that reduce carbon emissions and that cut the cost to individuals and businesses. Some examples over the jump:</p>
<p><a href="http://cleantechnica.com/2009/09/10/waxman-markey-cap-and-trade-will-pay-for-itself-cbo-finds/" class="more-link">Read more of this story &#187;</a></p>
]]></description>
    <wfw:commentRss>http://cleantechnica.com/2009/09/10/waxman-markey-cap-and-trade-will-pay-for-itself-cbo-finds/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>Mining Hydrothermal Vents For Renewable Electricity, Drinking Water + Valuable Minerals</title>
    <link>http://cleantechnica.com/2009/09/04/mining-hydrothermal-vents-for-renewable-electricity-drinking-water-valuable-minerals/</link>
    <comments>http://cleantechnica.com/2009/09/04/mining-hydrothermal-vents-for-renewable-electricity-drinking-water-valuable-minerals/#comments</comments>
    <pubDate>Fri, 04 Sep 2009 20:55:02 +0000</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Susan Kraemer</dc:creator>
    
		<category><![CDATA[Climate Change]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[alternative energy]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[fossil fuels]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[wind energy]]></category>

    <guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/2009/09/04/mining-hydrothermal-vents-for-renewable-electricity-drinking-water-valuable-minerals/</guid>
    <description><![CDATA[<p class="style1">Only after I snoozed my way through high school science class did science become more compelling than science fiction.</p>
<p>Back then, there was just no compelling reason to pay attention. Just a browzy fly buzzing in a smelly boring lab full of long agreed-upon dull principles that were really neither here nor there. In those days there were no colliding continents or hydrothermal vents or extremophile lifeforms. We looked to sci-fi for that.</p>
<p>Who knew that our planet would soon be busting at the seams with 7 billion of us. That our fossil fuel use would threaten our survival with climate changes &#8212; on a level unseen on the planet since Cyanobacteria made it safe it for oxygen-breathers 4 billion years ago.</p>
<p><a href="http://cleantechnica.com/files/2009/09/hydrothermal_vent_mine1.jpg"><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-3303" src="http://go635254.s3.amazonaws.com/cleantechnica/files/2009/09/hydrothermal_vent_mine1.jpg" alt="" width="500" height="444" /><br />
</a> Or that we would <em>not only</em> discover vast strange heat sources under the ocean but that we&#8217;d actually <strong>consider <em>mining</em> these hydrothermal vents for renewable energy: </strong>That was the sort of story you&#8217;d only find in science fiction back then.</p>
<p>But yet, here we are.  This is not science fiction<strong>:</strong>
<p><a href="http://cleantechnica.com/2009/09/04/mining-hydrothermal-vents-for-renewable-electricity-drinking-water-valuable-minerals/" class="more-link">Read more of this story &#187;</a></p>
]]></description>
    <wfw:commentRss>http://cleantechnica.com/2009/09/04/mining-hydrothermal-vents-for-renewable-electricity-drinking-water-valuable-minerals/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>My Small Town Could Become The Solar Energy Capitol</title>
    <link>http://ecochildsplay.com/2009/08/30/my-small-town-could-become-the-solar-energy-capitol/</link>
    <comments>http://ecochildsplay.com/2009/08/30/my-small-town-could-become-the-solar-energy-capitol/#comments</comments>
    <pubDate>Sun, 30 Aug 2009 23:03:24 +0000</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Leslie Quigley</dc:creator>
    
		<category><![CDATA[Community]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Green Home and Green Cleaning]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Other Environmental Topics]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Science]]></category>

    <guid isPermaLink="false">http://ecochildsplay.com/2009/08/30/my-small-town-could-become-the-solar-energy-capitol/</guid>
    <description><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://ecochildsplay.com/files/2009/08/430145323_1494325325_0.jpeg"><img class="alignnone size-medium wp-image-4456" src="http://go635254.s3.amazonaws.com/ecochildsplay/files/2009/08/430145323_1494325325_0-300x226.jpg" alt="" width="300" height="226" /></a></p>
<h4>According to the title of an article published in The City of Lancaster&#8217;s <a href="http://www.cityoflancasterca.org/">Outlook</a> (Fall 2009) magazine &#8220;The Future Looks Bright for <a href="http://ecochildsplay.com/2008/09/25/the-coolest-eco-friendly-night-lights-solar-sun-and-moon-jars/">Solar</a> Power in Lancaster&#8221;.</h4>
<p>My small town,  all 475,000 of us, are at the forefront of solar energy!<span> On August 5, 2009, <a href="http://www.esolar.com/"><span>eSolar</span></a> unveiled the 5 MW (mega watt) demonstration plant known as Sierra <span>SunTower</span>. </span>The <a href="http://ecochildsplay.com/2009/08/17/a-review-of-sneaky-green-uses-for-everyday-things-by-cy-tymony/">solar power</a> plant has<a href="http://www.esolar.com/"><span> </span></a>24,000 mirrors and two giant tower house boilers. The boilers create what&#8217;s known as &#8220;thermal solar&#8221; which is said to be more cost-effective than the standard photovoltaic approach used in solar cells. The process creates steam to drive the turbine generators. <span>The project was completed in 14 month time frame and has already begun to distribute power to Southern California Edison. </span></p>
<p><span><span>eSolar&#8217;s</span> site says &#8220;</span><a href="http://www.esolar.com/our_projects/"><span>Sierra <span>SunTower</span></span></a> will supply 5 MW of clean, <a href="http://ecochildsplay.com/2009/02/06/alternative-energy-education-fuel-cells-hydropower-and-global-warming-science-kits/">renewable energy </a>to the grid. This full-scale power plant, the only one of its kind in the U.S., produces electricity for Southern California Edison (SCE) and will power up to 4,000 homes.&#8221;</p>
<p><a href="http://www.esolar.com/sierra_fact_sheet.pdf"></a>
<p><a href="http://ecochildsplay.com/2009/08/30/my-small-town-could-become-the-solar-energy-capitol/" class="more-link">Read more of this story &#187;</a></p>
]]></description>
    <wfw:commentRss>http://ecochildsplay.com/2009/08/30/my-small-town-could-become-the-solar-energy-capitol/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
  </item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- 702 queries in 1.417 seconds. -->