<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
  xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
  xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
  >

<channel>
  <title>Green Options &#187; gasses</title>
  <link>http://greenoptions.com/tag/gasses</link>
  <description>Posts tagged 'gasses'</description>
  <pubDate>Mon, 29 Sep 2008 19:53:52 +0000</pubDate>
  <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
  <language>en</language>
  <item>
    <title>Scientists Create Device to Remove Carbon Directly from the Air</title>
    <link>http://cleantechnica.com/2008/09/29/scientists-create-device-to-remove-carbon-directly-from-the-air/</link>
    <comments>http://cleantechnica.com/2008/09/29/scientists-create-device-to-remove-carbon-directly-from-the-air/#comments</comments>
    <pubDate>Mon, 29 Sep 2008 19:53:52 +0000</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Joshua S Hill</dc:creator>
    
		<category><![CDATA[carbon emissions]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[technology]]></category>

    <guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/2008/09/29/scientists-create-device-to-remove-carbon-directly-from-the-air/</guid>
    <description><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://cleantechnica.com/files/2008/09/air-capture-pix-small.jpg"><img style="margin: 0px 5px 5px 0px" height="240" alt="Air Capture pix small" src="http://go635254.s3.amazonaws.com/cleantechnica/files/2008/09/air-capture-pix-small-thumb.jpg" width="160" align="left" border="0"/></a> Scientists from the University of Calgary in Canada have created a method to efficiently capture carbon dioxide directly from the air around us. The device, which is built on near-commercial technology, was built by Uof C climate change scientists David Keith and his team.
<p>&#8220;At first thought, capturing CO2 from the air where it&#8217;s at a concentration of 0.04 per cent seems absurd, when we are just starting to do cost-effective capture at power plants where CO2 produced is at a concentration of more than 10 per cent,&#8221; says Keith, Canada Research Chair in Energy and Environment.
<p>&#8220;But the thermodynamics suggests that air capture might only be a bit harder than capturing CO2 from power plants. We are trying to turn that theory into engineering reality.&#8221; </p>
<p><a href="http://cleantechnica.com/2008/09/29/scientists-create-device-to-remove-carbon-directly-from-the-air/" class="more-link">Read more of this story &#187;</a></p>
]]></description>
    <wfw:commentRss>http://cleantechnica.com/2008/09/29/scientists-create-device-to-remove-carbon-directly-from-the-air/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>9 Good Reasons to Be Wary of  the Trains Passing Through Your Town</title>
    <link>http://maxlindberg.greenoptions.com/2007/09/17/9-good-reasons-to-be-wary-of-the-trains-passing-through-your-town/</link>
    <comments>http://maxlindberg.greenoptions.com/2007/09/17/9-good-reasons-to-be-wary-of-the-trains-passing-through-your-town/#comments</comments>
    <pubDate>Mon, 17 Sep 2007 13:44:35 +0000</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Max Lindberg</dc:creator>
    
		<category><![CDATA[anyhdrous ammonia]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[chlorine]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[conservation]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[diesel fuel]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[environment]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[food]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[gas]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[gasses]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[hydrochloric acid. methanol]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[poisonous gasses]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[rail safety]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[railroad safety]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[railroads]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[safety]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[sodium chlorate]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[sodium hydroxide]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[sulfuric acid]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[tank cars]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[trains]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[uranium]]></category>

    <guid isPermaLink="false">http://maxlindberg.greenoptions.com/2007/09/17/9-good-reasons-to-be-wary-of-the-trains-passing-through-your-town/</guid>
    <description><![CDATA[<p>
<img src="/files/430/tankcar_0.jpg" alt="" width="451" height="190" align="middle" />
</p>
<p>
What&#8217;s riding the rails in your hometown?  A few hobos maybe, but also potentially deadly chemicals rumble through America&#8217;s communities daily.  My hometown paper, <a href="http://www.registermail.com/">The Galesburg <em>Register-Mail,</em></a><em> </em>printed a series of articles on the dangers nearly every train brings to a community.  And in Galesburg, IL, this is particularly important: approximately 1,000 cars travel through the city daily on two major railroads that cross town, the Burlington Northern and the Santa Fe, now known as BNSF, since the two merged.
</p>
<p>
How dangerous are some of those cars?  Well, they carry some nasty stuff:
</p>
<ul>
<li><strong>Anhydrous Ammonia:</strong>  This colorless gas may be fatal if inhaled, ingested or absorbed through the skin.  It could explode if exposed to heat, or burn, but it doesn&#8217;t ignite readily.</li>
<li><strong>Chlorine:</strong> It, too, can be fatal if inhaled or absorbed through the skin.  If a spill occurs during the daytime, people within at 1.5 mile radius must be evacuated; at night, more that 4.5 miles need to be evacuated.</li>
<li><strong>Diesel Fuel:</strong> Yep, it&#8217;s dangerous too: explosive when vapors are mixed with air, and it can burn eyes and skin.<!--break--></li>
<li><strong>Hydrochloric Acid:</strong> If a container is heated or contaminated with water, an explosion could occur.  Inhalation of vapors can kill, cause burns or severe injury.</li>
<li><strong>Methanol:</strong> Nasty stuff that&#8217;s flammable and explosive.  Again, inhalation, ingestion or absorption by the skin can be fatal.</li>
<li><strong>Sodium Chlorate:</strong> Same thing: possibly fatal if inhaled or ingested.  It can accelerate burning if involved with a fire, or it can explode.</li>
<li><strong>Sodium Hydroxide:</strong> It&#8217;s explosive but will not flame.  The usual warnings about inhalation, ingestion or being absorbed by the skin.</li>
<li><strong>Sulfuric Acid:</strong> It, too, is explosive, and will burn (but not ignite).  It can inflict severe burns on the skin, and is deadly to inhale or ingest.</li>
<li><strong>Uranium:</strong>  The article doesn&#8217;t cover uranium, but it too is being carried by railroads around the world in various forms, from the newly mined to spent rods.  Always dangerous, I just wanted to add it to the mix.</li>
</ul>
<p>
Any of these chemicals could, if spilled during a derailment, spread a fatal cloud over a community.  The chance of that happening, according to the article, is about the same as winning the lottery.  A spokesman for BNSF railway, Steve Forsberg, is quoted as saying that &#34;less than three-tenths of 1 percent of all rail shipments are materials that could be turned into a toxic cloud.&#34;
</p>
<p>
Do railroads have to carry these materials?  Yes, they are required by federal law to move them by the federal common carrier obligation.  Would they rather not?  Yes, the article says: it&#8217;s a &#34;bet the business&#34; public service.  But then, the rails are safer than transportation by truck, where the accident rate is many times more common.
</p>
<p>
Research is underway to make tank cars more reliable in case of an accident, such as staying upright and intact in case of derailment.  But don&#8217;t expect any progress soon as research has been delayed until the first of the year.
</p>
<p>
The solution, of course, is to &#34;go green&#34; by producing safer chemicals, but that appears a long way off.  Possibly the most dangerous chemicals are chlorine, which is still used to disinfect water, and anhydrous ammonia, a fertilizer base.
</p>
<p>
Accidents have occurred and will continue to do so.  One of the scarier happened a short time ago when a tank car filled with chlorine rolled 20 miles through Las Vegas, past hotels and resorts on the Strip until it was safely stopped.  I recall a tank car explosion in Kingman, AZ, back in the 70s that resulted in fatalities.  According to Patricia Abbatte, executive director of <a href="http://www.citizensforrailsafety.org/home.php">Citizens for Rail Safety</a>, &#34;The doomsday scenario is that one tank car of chlorine could kill up to 100,000 people in 30 minutes.&#34;
</p>
<p>
Until something better comes along, your friendly railroad will whistle it&#8217;s way through your community, past schools and homes carrying a deadly cargo.</p>
]]></description>
    <wfw:commentRss>http://maxlindberg.greenoptions.com/2007/09/17/9-good-reasons-to-be-wary-of-the-trains-passing-through-your-town/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
  </item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- 121 queries in 0.380 seconds. -->