<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
  xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
  xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
  >

<channel>
  <title>Green Options &#187; global warming</title>
  <link>http://greenoptions.com/tag/global-warming</link>
  <description>Posts tagged 'global warming'</description>
  <pubDate>Tue, 24 Nov 2009 22:12:21 +0000</pubDate>
  <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
  <language>en</language>
  <item>
    <title>Gene Banks to Preserve World&#8217;s Crops from Climate Change</title>
    <link>http://ecoworldly.com/2009/11/24/4978/</link>
    <comments>http://ecoworldly.com/2009/11/24/4978/#comments</comments>
    <pubDate>Tue, 24 Nov 2009 22:12:21 +0000</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Michael Ricciardi</dc:creator>
    
		<category><![CDATA[4270]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[About Economy]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[About Society]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[In Global]]></category>

    <guid isPermaLink="false">http://ecoworldly.com/2009/11/24/4978/</guid>
    <description><![CDATA[<h5 style="text-align: center"><a href="http://ecoworldly.com/files/2009/11/svalbard_global_seed_vault.jpg"><img class="aligncenter size-medium wp-image-4979" src="http://go635254.s3.amazonaws.com/ecoworldly/files/2009/11/svalbard_global_seed_vault-402x500.jpg" alt="Svalbard Gene Vault" width="402" height="500" /></a></h5>
<h5 style="text-align: center">Design of the Svalbard seed vault as of early 2007</h5>

<p><strong>In 1992, the Global Biodiversity Convention (GBC) was adopted in Rio de Janeiro, and which placed the biodiversity issue center stage&#8211;calling for the world-wide preservation of biodiversity and its equitable and sustainable use. The convention was established in response to both the increasing rate of plant extinction (through habitat loss), fears by poorer nations of &#8220;biopiracy&#8221;, and the increasing agricultural use of land for high-value crops, to the exclusion of lesser-value ones&#8211;a practice that diminishes crop biodiversity. These lesser-value crops are typically grown by independent and small farms in less economically advanced countries. Many of these so-called &#8220;orphan crops&#8221; risk becoming extinct. Further, many species of plant or tree that fall outside the conventional definition of agriculture&#8211;such as the sea-water tolerant mangrove tree&#8211;are being ignored, to the possible peril of future agriculture.</strong></p>
<p>Recent warming trends pose the greatest threat to preserving global &#8220;agrobiodiversity&#8221; due to its predicted alterations in temperature, precipitation, and sea level (thus the intrusion of saline water into fresh water ecosystems). Also, computer models show that global warming will increase the frequency and duration of flood and drought cycles. To protect civilization&#8217;s long-term food supply (and to protect against the social chaos of food shortages from consequent crop failures) from these potentially calamitous effects, scientists and agricultural policy experts, in cooperation with various governments, have begun establishing cryogenic gene banks to preserve the seeds of various, valuable crops for future agricultural use. The most notable example of this is the International Rice Research institute (IRRI) in the Philippines which stores over 100,000 strains of rice.</p>
<p><a href="http://ecoworldly.com/2009/11/24/4978/" class="more-link">Read more of this story &#187;</a></p>
]]></description>
    <wfw:commentRss>http://ecoworldly.com/2009/11/24/4978/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>1st High Seas Marine Protected Area in Southern Ocean &#8212; More Diverse than Galapagos Islands</title>
    <link>http://ecoworldly.com/2009/11/24/1st-high-seas-marine-protected-area-in-southern-ocean-more-diverse-than-galapagos-islands/</link>
    <comments>http://ecoworldly.com/2009/11/24/1st-high-seas-marine-protected-area-in-southern-ocean-more-diverse-than-galapagos-islands/#comments</comments>
    <pubDate>Tue, 24 Nov 2009 21:45:21 +0000</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Zachary Shahan</dc:creator>
    
		<category><![CDATA[About Animals]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[About Science]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[In Antarctica / The Arctic]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[In Global]]></category>

    <guid isPermaLink="false">http://ecoworldly.com/2009/11/24/1st-high-seas-marine-protected-area-in-southern-ocean-more-diverse-than-galapagos-islands/</guid>
    <description><![CDATA[<p><a href='http://ecoworldly.com/files/2009/11/southern-ocean-south-orkney-island.jpg'><img src="http://go635254.s3.amazonaws.com/ecoworldly/files/2009/11/southern-ocean-south-orkney-island.jpg" alt="" width="500" height="275" class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-4981" /></a></p>
<h3><strong>Fishing and refuse disposal are to be banned in the 1st high seas Marine Protected Area (MPA) in the Southern Ocean, an area of the ocean that contains more species than the Galapagos Islands.</strong></h3>
<p>This will allow scientists to monitor the effects of climate change in this region. This is only the first of possibly twelve such areas.</p>
<p><a href="http://ecoworldly.com/2009/11/24/1st-high-seas-marine-protected-area-in-southern-ocean-more-diverse-than-galapagos-islands/" class="more-link">Read more of this story &#187;</a></p>
]]></description>
    <wfw:commentRss>http://ecoworldly.com/2009/11/24/1st-high-seas-marine-protected-area-in-southern-ocean-more-diverse-than-galapagos-islands/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>Fossil Fuel CO2 Emissions Trends &#8212; 1990, 2000, 2008</title>
    <link>http://ecoworldly.com/2009/11/22/fossil-fuel-co2-emissions-trends-1990-2000-2008-global-carbon-budget-by-global-carbon-project/</link>
    <comments>http://ecoworldly.com/2009/11/22/fossil-fuel-co2-emissions-trends-1990-2000-2008-global-carbon-budget-by-global-carbon-project/#comments</comments>
    <pubDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 13:21:18 +0000</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Zachary Shahan</dc:creator>
    
		<category><![CDATA[About Climate]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[About Science]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[In Global]]></category>

    <guid isPermaLink="false">http://ecoworldly.com/2009/11/22/fossil-fuel-co2-emissions-trends-1990-2000-2008-global-carbon-budget-by-global-carbon-project/</guid>
    <description><![CDATA[<p><a href='http://ecoworldly.com/files/2009/11/power-plant-pollution-fossil-fuels-carbon-project.jpg'><img src="http://go635254.s3.amazonaws.com/ecoworldly/files/2009/11/power-plant-pollution-fossil-fuels-carbon-project.jpg" alt="" width="500" height="360" class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-4932" /></a></p>
<h3><strong>Overall, global CO2 emissions from fossil fuels increased 29% between 2000 and 2008 and 41% from 1990-2008, and the current concentration of CO2 in the atmosphere is now at its highest in at least 2 million years, according to a new study in the journal <em><a href="http://www.nature.com/ngeo/journal/vaop/ncurrent/abs/ngeo689.html">Nature Geoscience</a></em>.</strong></h3>

<p>The new report published this week by an international team of researchers who are part of the &#8220;Global Carbon Project&#8221; shows emissions trends through 2008 (including changes in emissions causes and in the amount of emissions remaining in the atmosphere) and brings up some major questions for the future as well. </p>
<p><a href="http://ecoworldly.com/2009/11/22/fossil-fuel-co2-emissions-trends-1990-2000-2008-global-carbon-budget-by-global-carbon-project/" class="more-link">Read more of this story &#187;</a></p>
]]></description>
    <wfw:commentRss>http://ecoworldly.com/2009/11/22/fossil-fuel-co2-emissions-trends-1990-2000-2008-global-carbon-budget-by-global-carbon-project/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>Oceans&#8217; Ability to Absorb Carbon &#38; Protect Against Climate Change Weakening</title>
    <link>http://ecoworldly.com/2009/11/20/oceans-ability-to-absorb-carbon-protect-against-climate-change-weakening/</link>
    <comments>http://ecoworldly.com/2009/11/20/oceans-ability-to-absorb-carbon-protect-against-climate-change-weakening/#comments</comments>
    <pubDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 23:23:03 +0000</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Zachary Shahan</dc:creator>
    
		<category><![CDATA[About Climate]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[About Science]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[In Global]]></category>

    <guid isPermaLink="false">http://ecoworldly.com/2009/11/20/oceans-ability-to-absorb-carbon-protect-against-climate-change-weakening/</guid>
    <description><![CDATA[<p><a href='http://ecoworldly.com/files/2009/11/ocean-carbon-absorption-climate-change.jpg'><img src="http://go635254.s3.amazonaws.com/ecoworldly/files/2009/11/ocean-carbon-absorption-climate-change.jpg" alt="" width="500" height="334" class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-4922" /></a></p>
<h3><strong>Oceans regulate our climate. They play a key role in keeping the world&#8217;s &#8220;homeostasis&#8221; in tact. However, their ability to absorb carbon &#38; keep the climate in balance is dwindling, a new report shows.</strong></h3>
<p>In a year-by-year study from 1765 to 2008, researchers found that the oceans are struggling to meet increasing emissions demands. They cannot take in as much carbon as they used to.</p>

<p>The study, published in the November 19 issue of the journal <em>Nature</em>, found that the percentage of fossil fuel emissions the ocean has been taking in since 2000 has decreased by as much as 10%.</p>
<p>This is the first study of its kind or breadth. One previous study had attempted to measure the oceans&#8217; industrial carbon absorption for one year &#8212; 1994. This does so for a period of 200+ years. </p>
<p><a href="http://ecoworldly.com/2009/11/20/oceans-ability-to-absorb-carbon-protect-against-climate-change-weakening/" class="more-link">Read more of this story &#187;</a></p>
]]></description>
    <wfw:commentRss>http://ecoworldly.com/2009/11/20/oceans-ability-to-absorb-carbon-protect-against-climate-change-weakening/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>Asia Light Years Ahead of the US in Clean Tech Investment &#8212; Financial and Economic Consequences</title>
    <link>http://cleantechnica.com/2009/11/20/asia-light-years-ahead-of-the-us-in-clean-tech-investment-financial-and-economic-consequences/</link>
    <comments>http://cleantechnica.com/2009/11/20/asia-light-years-ahead-of-the-us-in-clean-tech-investment-financial-and-economic-consequences/#comments</comments>
    <pubDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 11:50:06 +0000</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Zachary Shahan</dc:creator>
    
		<category><![CDATA[alternative energy]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[green jobs]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[policy]]></category>

    <guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/2009/11/20/asia-light-years-ahead-of-the-us-in-clean-tech-investment-financial-and-economic-consequences/</guid>
    <description><![CDATA[<p><a href='http://cleantechnica.com/files/2009/11/solar-panels-large-sun.jpg'><img src="http://go635254.s3.amazonaws.com/cleantechnica/files/2009/11/solar-panels-large-sun.jpg" alt="" width="500" height="333" class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-3992" /></a><br />
<strong>Asia is investing hundreds of billions of dollars more than the US in clean technology, according to a new report by two research institutions. In the future, the US may be importing trillions of dollars of needed clean technology (and losing countless jobs to Asia) as a result.</strong></p>

<p>In total, the report showed that China, Japan, and South Korea will invest about $509 billion in clean tech over the next 5 years, whereas the US (with our greenest President in decades, maybe ever) is only expected to invest $172 billion (about 3 times less) &#8212; this is assuming the climate and energy legislation in Congress passes. </p>
<p>If the US were to invest the same percentage of its Gross Domestic Product (GDP) as South Korea, it would invest almost $140 billion per year ($700 billion over this five year period)! Compared to China, the anticipated per-GDP investment ratio is 1:4 (US to China).</p>
<p>In 2008, Japan almost matched US R&#38;D spending on energy and achieved almost the same number of international clean energy patents despite having dramatically lower GDP.</p>
<p>The financial investment is not the only thing giving these countries a major advantage in this field, though.</p>
<p><a href="http://cleantechnica.com/2009/11/20/asia-light-years-ahead-of-the-us-in-clean-tech-investment-financial-and-economic-consequences/" class="more-link">Read more of this story &#187;</a></p>
]]></description>
    <wfw:commentRss>http://cleantechnica.com/2009/11/20/asia-light-years-ahead-of-the-us-in-clean-tech-investment-financial-and-economic-consequences/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>Reindeer Tragedy: Ice Collapses, Hundreds Die</title>
    <link>http://ecoworldly.com/2009/11/17/reindeer-tragedy-ice-collapses-hundreds-die/</link>
    <comments>http://ecoworldly.com/2009/11/17/reindeer-tragedy-ice-collapses-hundreds-die/#comments</comments>
    <pubDate>Tue, 17 Nov 2009 23:36:01 +0000</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Jace Shoemaker-Galloway</dc:creator>
    
		<category><![CDATA[About Animals]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[About Climate]]></category>

    <guid isPermaLink="false">http://ecoworldly.com/2009/11/17/reindeer-tragedy-ice-collapses-hundreds-die/</guid>
    <description><![CDATA[<p style="text-align: center"><a href="http://ecoworldly.com/files/2009/11/reindeer.jpg"><img class="aligncenter size-medium wp-image-4870" src="http://go635254.s3.amazonaws.com/ecoworldly/files/2009/11/reindeer-500x390.jpg" alt="Reindeer" width="445" height="377" /></a></p>
<p style="text-align: left"></p>
<p style="text-align: left">A trek across a frozen lake proved to be a deadly journey for hundreds of reindeer last week.  Sami herders in Sweden were leading 3,000 reindeer to “greener pastures” across a frequently-traveled route during their annual migration to their winter grazing grounds when tragedy struck.
<p><a href="http://ecoworldly.com/2009/11/17/reindeer-tragedy-ice-collapses-hundreds-die/" class="more-link">Read more of this story &#187;</a></p>
]]></description>
    <wfw:commentRss>http://ecoworldly.com/2009/11/17/reindeer-tragedy-ice-collapses-hundreds-die/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>Revenge of the Angry Mermaid</title>
    <link>http://sustainablog.org/2009/11/17/revenge-of-the-angry-mermaid/</link>
    <comments>http://sustainablog.org/2009/11/17/revenge-of-the-angry-mermaid/#comments</comments>
    <pubDate>Tue, 17 Nov 2009 19:39:15 +0000</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Tom Schueneman</dc:creator>
    
		<category><![CDATA[Action &amp; Activism]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Climate change]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[International]]></category>

    <guid isPermaLink="false">http://sustainablog.org/2009/11/17/revenge-of-the-angry-mermaid/</guid>
    <description><![CDATA[<p><img class="aligncenter size-medium wp-image-5108" src="http://go635254.s3.amazonaws.com/sustainablog/files/2009/11/little_mermaid-300x198.jpg" alt="" width="300" height="198" /></p>
<p>Copenhagen is a water town, and the iconic symbol of Denmark&#8217;s capital city is the Little Mermaid silently standing watch over the harbor. Next month the Little Mermaid welcomes the global community coming to negotiate at least the foundation of an international treaty at the <a href="http://en.cop15.dk/" target="_blank">COP15</a> climate conference to carry beyond the Kyoto Protocol expiring in 2012.</p>
<p>The Little Mermaid takes her role as a symbol of climate change seriously. And she&#8217;s angry. Angry because also coming to her town are thousands of lobbyists and business (as usual) representatives intent on holding back progress for a dangerously warming world, opting instead for short term profits over long term sustainability.</p>
<p>The Little Mermaid is now the <a href="http://www.angrymermaid.org/" target="_blank">Angry Mermaid</a>:</p>
<blockquote><p>&#8220;So the Angry Mermaid decided to launch an award – in her own name – to highlight how corporate lobbyists were scheming to sabotage action to save the climate. She asked people she knew if they could suggest which companies were doing the most to undermine climate action – and she decided to publish a shortlist and ask the public to vote.&#8221;</p></blockquote>
<p><a href="http://sustainablog.org/2009/11/17/revenge-of-the-angry-mermaid/" class="more-link">Read more of this story &#187;</a></p>
]]></description>
    <wfw:commentRss>http://sustainablog.org/2009/11/17/revenge-of-the-angry-mermaid/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>Economic Value of Ecosystems and Biodiversity &#8212; New Report</title>
    <link>http://ecoworldly.com/2009/11/13/economic-value-of-ecosystems-and-biodiversity-new-report/</link>
    <comments>http://ecoworldly.com/2009/11/13/economic-value-of-ecosystems-and-biodiversity-new-report/#comments</comments>
    <pubDate>Fri, 13 Nov 2009 19:02:23 +0000</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Zachary Shahan</dc:creator>
    
		<category><![CDATA[About Economy]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[About Environment]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[In Global]]></category>

    <guid isPermaLink="false">http://ecoworldly.com/2009/11/13/economic-value-of-ecosystems-and-biodiversity-new-report/</guid>
    <description><![CDATA[<p><a href='http://ecoworldly.com/files/2009/11/rainforest-ii.jpg'><img src="http://go635254.s3.amazonaws.com/ecoworldly/files/2009/11/rainforest-ii.jpg" alt="" width="500" height="375" class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-4801" /></a></p>
<h3><strong>A new report, The Economics of Ecosystems and Biodiversity (TEEB), attempts to bring to the world&#8217;s attention the truly great economic value of ecosystems and biodiversity, as well as the benefits of taking these into account when making policies.</strong></h3>

<p>The value of the world&#8217;s natural ecosystems and biodiversity is something lacking in most economic analyses. Lack of value for what is truly priceless doesn&#8217;t just hurt the environment, however. It is also a sort of economic suicide. This new report, hosted by the United Nations Environment Programme and supported by key EU, UK, German, Swedish, Dutch, and Norwegian bodies, attempts to bring all of this to our attention more and <strong>show some positive case studies</strong> of how taking the environment into consideration can actually save us money.</p>
<p>As <a href="http://www.teebweb.org/LinkClick.aspx?fileticket=I4Y2nqqIiCg%3d&#38;tabid=924&#38;language=en-US">the report</a> says: &#8220;the failure of markets to adequately consider the value of ecosystem services is of concern not only to environment, development and climate change ministries but also to finance, economics and business ministries.&#8221;</p>
<p><a href="http://ecoworldly.com/2009/11/13/economic-value-of-ecosystems-and-biodiversity-new-report/" class="more-link">Read more of this story &#187;</a></p>
]]></description>
    <wfw:commentRss>http://ecoworldly.com/2009/11/13/economic-value-of-ecosystems-and-biodiversity-new-report/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>Greenland Ice Sheet Melting Faster than Ever</title>
    <link>http://ecoworldly.com/2009/11/13/greenland-ice-sheet-melting-faster-than-ever/</link>
    <comments>http://ecoworldly.com/2009/11/13/greenland-ice-sheet-melting-faster-than-ever/#comments</comments>
    <pubDate>Fri, 13 Nov 2009 14:48:12 +0000</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Zachary Shahan</dc:creator>
    
		<category><![CDATA[About Climate]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[In Antarctica / The Arctic]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[In Global]]></category>

    <guid isPermaLink="false">http://ecoworldly.com/2009/11/13/greenland-ice-sheet-melting-faster-than-ever/</guid>
    <description><![CDATA[<p><a href='http://ecoworldly.com/files/2009/11/greenland-ice.jpg'><img src="http://go635254.s3.amazonaws.com/ecoworldly/files/2009/11/greenland-ice.jpg" alt="" width="500" height="330" class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-4797" /></a></p>
<h3><strong>More data show that &#8216;Yes, <a href="http://ecoworldly.com/2009/10/29/2000-year-arctic-cooling-trend-reversed-itself-near-turn-of-20th-century/">climate change is happening</a>, ice is melting at alarming rates, and the time for action is now.&#8217;</strong></h3>
<p>Independent research using state-of-the-art modeling and satellite observations shows that melting of the Greenland ice sheet is <strong>speeding up</strong>.</p>

<p>Four months ago, new research showed that <a href="http://ecoworldly.com/2009/07/02/arctic-sea-ice-lowest-in-800-years/"><strong>Arctic sea ice was at its lowest point</strong></a> in about 800 years, another study a couple months ago showed <a href="http://ecoworldly.com/2009/09/25/lasers-from-space-show-ice-sheets-thinning-greenland-and-antarctica/"><strong>suprisingly fast melting in Greenland and Antarctica</strong></a>. Now, research from other scientists in Bristol (UK) published in <em>Science</em> confirms that <strong>ice sheets in Greenland are melting at an unprecedented rate</strong>. </p>
<p>There has been a lot of effort in the past few months to knock down climate change activists, say it isn&#8217;t happening. No wonder, of course, given that we are quickly approaching one of the most important meetings in the history of the human race &#8212; <strong>the climate change conference in Copenhagen</strong>. This new report shows again that whether we admit it or not, ice is melting, sea levels are bound to rise, climate change is happening, and the whole world will be changed as a result of it.</p>
<p><a href="http://ecoworldly.com/2009/11/13/greenland-ice-sheet-melting-faster-than-ever/" class="more-link">Read more of this story &#187;</a></p>
]]></description>
    <wfw:commentRss>http://ecoworldly.com/2009/11/13/greenland-ice-sheet-melting-faster-than-ever/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>M&#38;M&#8217;S® and MARS Going Green? New Solar Garden at Headquarters in New Jersey</title>
    <link>http://cleantechnica.com/2009/11/10/mms%c2%ae-and-mars-going-green-new-solar-garden-at-headquarters-in-new-jersey/</link>
    <comments>http://cleantechnica.com/2009/11/10/mms%c2%ae-and-mars-going-green-new-solar-garden-at-headquarters-in-new-jersey/#comments</comments>
    <pubDate>Tue, 10 Nov 2009 17:13:04 +0000</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Zachary Shahan</dc:creator>
    
		<category><![CDATA[alternative energy]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[business]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[solar energy]]></category>

    <guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/2009/11/10/mms%c2%ae-and-mars-going-green-new-solar-garden-at-headquarters-in-new-jersey/</guid>
    <description><![CDATA[<p><a href='http://cleantechnica.com/files/2009/11/mm2.jpg'><img src="http://go635254.s3.amazonaws.com/cleantechnica/files/2009/11/mm2.jpg" alt="" width="500" height="332" class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-3926" /></a><br />
<strong>Candy giant MARS, parent company of M&#38;M&#8217;S®, DOVE®, MILKY WAY®, SNICKERS®, 3 MUSKETEERS®, and TWIX®, turned on a huge new solar array (a &#8220;solar garden&#8221;) at its headquarters in New Jersey today.</strong> No matter what you think of candy food like this, it is good to see such a company going solar. Popular with millions, billions perhaps, and about as mainstream as you can imagine, this is a good step for solar&#8217;s more widespread use across the country.</p>

<p>This facility is <strong>PSEG Solar Source</strong>&#8217;s first large-scale solar project. It is one of the largest solar projects in the state of New Jersey, which is already 2nd only to California in its amount of installed solar capacity. The MARS headquarters adjacent to the solar garden is the workplace of about 1,200 employees and is where M&#38;M&#8217;S® Brand Chocolate Candies are manufactured.</p>
<p><a href="http://cleantechnica.com/2009/11/10/mms%c2%ae-and-mars-going-green-new-solar-garden-at-headquarters-in-new-jersey/" class="more-link">Read more of this story &#187;</a></p>
]]></description>
    <wfw:commentRss>http://cleantechnica.com/2009/11/10/mms%c2%ae-and-mars-going-green-new-solar-garden-at-headquarters-in-new-jersey/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>Smart Plugs (TalkingPlugs) for Your Home</title>
    <link>http://cleantechnica.com/2009/11/09/smart-plugs-talkingplugs-for-your-home/</link>
    <comments>http://cleantechnica.com/2009/11/09/smart-plugs-talkingplugs-for-your-home/#comments</comments>
    <pubDate>Mon, 09 Nov 2009 23:54:46 +0000</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Zachary Shahan</dc:creator>
    
		<category><![CDATA[consumer technology]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[energy efficiency]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[products]]></category>

    <guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/2009/11/09/smart-plugs-talkingplugs-for-your-home/</guid>
    <description><![CDATA[<p><a href='http://cleantechnica.com/files/2009/11/socket.jpg'><img src="http://go635254.s3.amazonaws.com/cleantechnica/files/2009/11/socket.jpg" alt="" width="500" height="323" class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-3919" /></a><br />
<strong>Zerofootprint has created a new &#8220;TalkingPlug&#8221; that will help you to better monitor the energy usage of different appliances and electronics. How? By making your electrical sockets smarter.</strong></p>
<p><a href="http://www.zerofootprint.net/">Zerofootprint</a> already helps corporations and governments in evaluating and reducing their carbon emissions through various methods. It also helps households through innovative technologies such as this one. This new <strong>TalkingPlug</strong> is for corporations or households (<em>or anyone with electrical sockets</em>) and will have an initial price tag of about $50. The price may go down considerably if it can make the product on a larger scale.</p>
<p>How does it work? What are its advantages compared to <strong>Google&#8217;s PowerMeter</strong> and other similar up and coming technologies?</p>
<p><a href="http://cleantechnica.com/2009/11/09/smart-plugs-talkingplugs-for-your-home/" class="more-link">Read more of this story &#187;</a></p>
]]></description>
    <wfw:commentRss>http://cleantechnica.com/2009/11/09/smart-plugs-talkingplugs-for-your-home/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>New Zealand Environment Court Says No to Huge Wind Farm</title>
    <link>http://cleantechnica.com/2009/11/09/new-zealand-environment-court-says-no-to-huge-wind-farm/</link>
    <comments>http://cleantechnica.com/2009/11/09/new-zealand-environment-court-says-no-to-huge-wind-farm/#comments</comments>
    <pubDate>Mon, 09 Nov 2009 14:26:46 +0000</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Zachary Shahan</dc:creator>
    
		<category><![CDATA[Climate Change]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[alternative energy]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[wind energy]]></category>

    <guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/2009/11/09/new-zealand-environment-court-says-no-to-huge-wind-farm/</guid>
    <description><![CDATA[<p><a href='http://cleantechnica.com/files/2009/11/newz.jpg'><img src="http://go635254.s3.amazonaws.com/cleantechnica/files/2009/11/newz.jpg" alt="" width="500" height="333" class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-3915" /></a><br />
<strong>What would have been the Southern Hemisphere&#8217;s largest wind farm, a $2 billion NZD ($1.4 billion USD) and 630 MW wind farm in New Zealand, is not happening because New Zealand&#8217;s Environment Court says that it would ruin the surrounding landscape.</strong></p>
<p>This project would have powered <strong>over a million homes</strong> and made a huge dent in New Zealand&#8217;s greenhouse gas emissions. It is not happening now because of a group of NIMBY activists and the Environment Court&#8217;s ruling.</p>
<p>This is a huge blow, in itself, to <strong>renewable and wind energy proponents</strong>, but it also brings concerns for future wind energy projects.</p>
<p><a href="http://cleantechnica.com/2009/11/09/new-zealand-environment-court-says-no-to-huge-wind-farm/" class="more-link">Read more of this story &#187;</a></p>
]]></description>
    <wfw:commentRss>http://cleantechnica.com/2009/11/09/new-zealand-environment-court-says-no-to-huge-wind-farm/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>Maldives Goes from Underwater Meetings to Huge Wind Farm</title>
    <link>http://cleantechnica.com/2009/11/04/maldives-goes-from-underwater-meetings-to-huge-wind-farm/</link>
    <comments>http://cleantechnica.com/2009/11/04/maldives-goes-from-underwater-meetings-to-huge-wind-farm/#comments</comments>
    <pubDate>Wed, 04 Nov 2009 15:03:15 +0000</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Zachary Shahan</dc:creator>
    
		<category><![CDATA[Climate Change]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[alternative energy]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[wind energy]]></category>

    <guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/2009/11/04/maldives-goes-from-underwater-meetings-to-huge-wind-farm/</guid>
    <description><![CDATA[<p><a href='http://cleantechnica.com/files/2009/11/maldives0.jpg'><img src="http://go635254.s3.amazonaws.com/cleantechnica/files/2009/11/maldives0.jpg" alt="" width="500" height="335" class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-3891" /></a><br />
<strong>Maldives, one of the most beautiful nations on earth, held the artistic, theatrical event of an <a href="http://ecoworldly.com/2009/10/10/maldives-government-ministers-meeting-under-water/">underwater government meeting</a> last month, to try to bring more attention to the threats of climate change.</strong> Now, they are getting more practical but still grabbing headlines &#8212; they are looking to build a wind farm that will generate 40% of the island nation&#8217;s electricity needs.</p>
<p>The wind farm plans were announced earlier this week. The project will include 30 turbines and is expected to provide the nation with 75 MW of power, powering the capital city, their international airport, and more!</p>
<p><a href="http://cleantechnica.com/2009/11/04/maldives-goes-from-underwater-meetings-to-huge-wind-farm/" class="more-link">Read more of this story &#187;</a></p>
]]></description>
    <wfw:commentRss>http://cleantechnica.com/2009/11/04/maldives-goes-from-underwater-meetings-to-huge-wind-farm/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>Climate Change Conference Calls on US for Reduction Targets</title>
    <link>http://sustainablog.org/2009/11/03/climate-change-conference-us-reduction-targets/</link>
    <comments>http://sustainablog.org/2009/11/03/climate-change-conference-us-reduction-targets/#comments</comments>
    <pubDate>Tue, 03 Nov 2009 17:35:48 +0000</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>SolveClimate</dc:creator>
    
		<category><![CDATA[Climate change]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Environmental Policies]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[International]]></category>

    <guid isPermaLink="false">http://sustainablog.org/2009/11/03/climate-change-conference-us-reduction-targets/</guid>
    <description><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://sustainablog.org/files/2009/11/clocks-tcktcktck.jpg"><img class="alignright size-full wp-image-5075" src="http://go635254.s3.amazonaws.com/sustainablog/files/2009/11/clocks-tcktcktck.jpg" alt="" width="300" height="217" /></a><em>This post was written by Stacy Feldman (reporting from Barcelona,  Spain), and <a href="http://solveclimate.com/blog/20091102/un-climate-chief-praises-china-says-us-must-deliver-concrete-2020-target">originally published</a> at <a href="http://solveclimate.com/">SolveClimate</a>. </em></p>
<p>The United States must deliver concrete mid-term greenhouse gas reduction targets by next month or it will destroy efforts to achieve a framework for a global climate change deal in Copenhagen, United Nations climate chief Yvo de Boer said Monday as a week of international talks on global warming began in Barcelona.</p>
<p>&#8220;I do not think the international community will accept an agreement that lacks clarity from the U.S. on targets,&#8221; de Boer said.</p>
<p>The Barcelona talks are the final five days of two years of global negotiations leading up to the crucial UN Climate Change Conference, from Dec. 7-18, in Copenhagen. De Boer&#8217;s worst fear now is that the Copenhagen conference will end with a lack of clarity on key issues and lead to a protracted political standoff.</p>
<p>&#8220;Negotiations must stop at Copenhagen. Otherwise negotiations will drag on when only the technical work should be going on,&#8221; he said.</p>
<p>A decision by the Obama administration to put a concrete 2020 target on the table could be the game changer for the world, he suggested.</p>

<p><a href="http://sustainablog.org/2009/11/03/climate-change-conference-us-reduction-targets/" class="more-link">Read more of this story &#187;</a></p>
]]></description>
    <wfw:commentRss>http://sustainablog.org/2009/11/03/climate-change-conference-us-reduction-targets/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>GOP Will Cry in the Corner During Kerry-Boxer Markup</title>
    <link>http://redgreenandblue.org/2009/10/31/gop-will-cry-in-the-corner-during-kerry-boxer-markup/</link>
    <comments>http://redgreenandblue.org/2009/10/31/gop-will-cry-in-the-corner-during-kerry-boxer-markup/#comments</comments>
    <pubDate>Sat, 31 Oct 2009 14:40:46 +0000</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Dave Levitan</dc:creator>
    
		<category><![CDATA[Leader]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Policy]]></category>

    <guid isPermaLink="false">http://redgreenandblue.org/2009/10/31/gop-will-cry-in-the-corner-during-kerry-boxer-markup/</guid>
    <description><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://redgreenandblue.org/files/2009/10/crying_in_the_corner.jpg"><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-3687" src="http://go635254.s3.amazonaws.com/redgreenandblue/files/2009/10/crying_in_the_corner.jpg" alt="" width="327" height="297" /></a></p>
<p>The spookiest news I&#8217;ve heard so far this Halloween is the <a href="http://www.politico.com/news/stories/1009/28951.html" target="_blank">report from Politico.com</a> that the seven Republican members of the Senate Environment and Public Works Committee will boycott next Tuesday&#8217;s planned markup of the Kerry-Boxer climate legislation. Ah yes, the &#8220;<a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZEKTSO1scaI" target="_blank">screw you guys, I&#8217;m going home</a>&#8221; tactic. How productive.
<p><a href="http://redgreenandblue.org/2009/10/31/gop-will-cry-in-the-corner-during-kerry-boxer-markup/" class="more-link">Read more of this story &#187;</a></p>
]]></description>
    <wfw:commentRss>http://redgreenandblue.org/2009/10/31/gop-will-cry-in-the-corner-during-kerry-boxer-markup/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>The Danger of Staring too Close at 350</title>
    <link>http://sustainablog.org/2009/10/30/the-danger-of-staring-too-close-at-350/</link>
    <comments>http://sustainablog.org/2009/10/30/the-danger-of-staring-too-close-at-350/#comments</comments>
    <pubDate>Fri, 30 Oct 2009 20:22:09 +0000</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Tom Schueneman</dc:creator>
    
		<category><![CDATA[Action &amp; Activism]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Climate change]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

    <guid isPermaLink="false">http://sustainablog.org/2009/10/30/the-danger-of-staring-too-close-at-350/</guid>
    <description><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://sustainablog.org/files/2009/10/350_fire_dance.jpg"><img class="aligncenter size-medium wp-image-5067" src="http://go635254.s3.amazonaws.com/sustainablog/files/2009/10/350_fire_dance-300x200.jpg" alt="" width="300" height="200" /></a></p>
<p>The <a href="http://www.mnn.com/lifestyle/ecollywood/blogs/after-the-international-day-of-climate-action" target="_self">International Day of Climate Action</a> last Saturday saw the power of grassroots activism leveraged by new media and social networking. Through an online and viral campaign, <a href="http://www.billmckibben.com/" target="_self">Bill Mckibben&#8217;s</a> climate action group <a href="http://www.350.org/" target="_self"><em>350.org</em></a> inspired an international response of more than 5,200 events in 181 countries. Hailed as the &#8220;most widespread day of environmental action in the planet&#8217;s history,&#8221; the action focused on a single number: 350. That&#8217;s the level in parts-per-million (ppm) many scientists now say is the safe level of CO2 in the atmosphere to avoid the worst consequences of climate change.</p>
<p>Focusing on that single number represents both the genius and the possible Achilles heal of the such a grassroots effort.</p>
<p><a href="http://sustainablog.org/2009/10/30/the-danger-of-staring-too-close-at-350/" class="more-link">Read more of this story &#187;</a></p>
]]></description>
    <wfw:commentRss>http://sustainablog.org/2009/10/30/the-danger-of-staring-too-close-at-350/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>SuperFreakonomics Redux: Even Congress is Riled Up</title>
    <link>http://redgreenandblue.org/2009/10/30/superfreakonomics-redux-even-congress-is-riled-up/</link>
    <comments>http://redgreenandblue.org/2009/10/30/superfreakonomics-redux-even-congress-is-riled-up/#comments</comments>
    <pubDate>Fri, 30 Oct 2009 16:15:26 +0000</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Dave Levitan</dc:creator>
    
		<category><![CDATA[Climate Change]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Leader]]></category>

    <guid isPermaLink="false">http://redgreenandblue.org/2009/10/30/superfreakonomics-redux-even-congress-is-riled-up/</guid>
    <description><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://redgreenandblue.org/files/2009/10/jay2.jpg"><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-3682" src="http://go635254.s3.amazonaws.com/redgreenandblue/files/2009/10/jay2.jpg" alt="" width="348" height="328" /></a>Last week I <a href="http://redgreenandblue.org/2009/10/18/the-superfreakonomics-dust-up-who-cares/" target="_self">wrote in this space</a> that when faced with a problem (global warming, carbon dioxide emissions) that so clearly requires huge top-down action from governments the world over, what two contrarians write in a book doesn&#8217;t exactly bother me that much. It <a href="http://climateprogress.org/2009/10/12/superfreakonomics-errors-levitt-caldeira-myhrvold/" target="_blank">bothers Joe Romm</a> at Climate Progress, clearly, and now, well, I&#8217;ve got even less company, because <a href="http://climateprogress.org/2009/10/30/rep-jay-inslee-slams-superfreakonomics-people-are-still-trying-to-write-books-to-deceive-the-american-public-on-climate-science/#more-13443" target="_blank">members of Congress are pissed off</a> too.
<p><a href="http://redgreenandblue.org/2009/10/30/superfreakonomics-redux-even-congress-is-riled-up/" class="more-link">Read more of this story &#187;</a></p>
]]></description>
    <wfw:commentRss>http://redgreenandblue.org/2009/10/30/superfreakonomics-redux-even-congress-is-riled-up/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>Scientists Behaving Badly</title>
    <link>http://sustainablog.org/2009/10/30/scientists-behaving-badly/</link>
    <comments>http://sustainablog.org/2009/10/30/scientists-behaving-badly/#comments</comments>
    <pubDate>Fri, 30 Oct 2009 06:27:21 +0000</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Steve Savage</dc:creator>
    
		<category><![CDATA[Climate change]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Environmental &amp; Climate Science]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Science]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>

    <guid isPermaLink="false">http://sustainablog.org/2009/10/30/scientists-behaving-badly/</guid>
    <description><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://sustainablog.org/files/2009/10/lab-coats.jpg"><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-5064" src="http://go635254.s3.amazonaws.com/sustainablog/files/2009/10/lab-coats.jpg" alt="Lab coats" width="500" height="333" /></a></p>

<p>The discussions following my two last posts about <a title="Post about the Pew study" href="http://sustainablog.org/2009/10/25/disturbing-trends-in-what-americans-believe-about-climate-change/#comment-95025" target="_blank">climate change opinion shifts</a> and about an <a title="Post about anti-science drift" href="http://sustainablog.org/2009/10/28/the-bizarre-modern-coalition-of-anti-science-forces/" target="_blank">anti-science coalition</a> have made it clear that one of the reasons people distrust science is that &#8220;Science&#8221; fails to speak with one voice.  There are definitely forces from the outside of Science that erode trust, but there are also internal issues.</p>
<p>The problem is that Science will not ever &#8220;speak with one voice.&#8221;  Scientists often have different opinions about a given topic.  Often that simply represents a healthy part of the scientific process.  When I hear someone say, &#8220;scientists don&#8217;t even agree about this!&#8221; I want to say, &#8220;you don&#8217;t know many scientists, do you!&#8221;  We are trained to questions assumptions and scrutinize analytical methods.  We are taught how to spot artifacts and how to come up with alternate hypotheses.  Some scientists get a little aggressive about this (there is usually at least one curmudgeon in every department).</p>
<p>There are definitely some topics that are so complex that it is impossible to be 100% sure about conclusions.  There are questions that are not amenable to running a controlled experiment.  These are all factors that make a topic like climate change so controversial.  These are legitimate reasons for the lack of a single &#8220;answer from science.&#8221;</p>
<p>All the above said, there are plenty of examples of scientific disagreements that arise from what can only, honestly be called <strong>bad scienc</strong><strong>e.</strong> Doing science well is non-trivial.  It requires a good deal of mental rigor and comprehensive information acquisition.  If we scientists are honest we all have to admit that we can fall short of the ideal &#8220;scientific method&#8221; at times.  Trust in &#8220;Science&#8221; ultimately means trusting &#8220;Scientists&#8221; and thats sometimes where the trouble starts.  There are 5 main ways that I can think of that scientsts can &#8220;behave badly.&#8221;  Maybe you can add some more.</p>
<p><a href="http://sustainablog.org/2009/10/30/scientists-behaving-badly/" class="more-link">Read more of this story &#187;</a></p>
]]></description>
    <wfw:commentRss>http://sustainablog.org/2009/10/30/scientists-behaving-badly/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>Senate Climate Bill Goes After Only 2% of American Businesses</title>
    <link>http://redgreenandblue.org/2009/10/28/senate-climate-bill-goes-after-only-2-of-american-businesses/</link>
    <comments>http://redgreenandblue.org/2009/10/28/senate-climate-bill-goes-after-only-2-of-american-businesses/#comments</comments>
    <pubDate>Wed, 28 Oct 2009 15:17:11 +0000</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Timothy B. Hurst</dc:creator>
    
		<category><![CDATA[Climate Change]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Choice]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Energy]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[U.S.]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[World]]></category>

    <guid isPermaLink="false">http://redgreenandblue.org/2009/10/28/senate-climate-bill-goes-after-only-2-of-american-businesses/</guid>
    <description><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://redgreenandblue.org/files/2009/10/4024864398_f78031c035.jpg"></a></p>
<p style="text-align: center"><img class="alignnone size-full wp-image-3679 aligncenter" src="http://go635254.s3.amazonaws.com/redgreenandblue/files/2009/10/4024864398_f78031c035.jpg" alt="" width="500" height="351" /></p>
<h3>Agriculture, transportation and small businesses exempt from Boxer-Kerry</h3>
<p>Only 2% of companies are covered by the Clean Energy Jobs and American Power Act, but that 2% represents 70% of US emissions, says Senator John Kerry (D-Mass.), the bill&#8217;s co-sponsor.
<p><a href="http://redgreenandblue.org/2009/10/28/senate-climate-bill-goes-after-only-2-of-american-businesses/" class="more-link">Read more of this story &#187;</a></p>
]]></description>
    <wfw:commentRss>http://redgreenandblue.org/2009/10/28/senate-climate-bill-goes-after-only-2-of-american-businesses/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>Is Global Scale Biofuels Production Good or Bad for Climate Change?</title>
    <link>http://cleantechnica.com/2009/10/28/is-global-scale-biofuels-production-good-or-bad-for-climate-change/</link>
    <comments>http://cleantechnica.com/2009/10/28/is-global-scale-biofuels-production-good-or-bad-for-climate-change/#comments</comments>
    <pubDate>Wed, 28 Oct 2009 15:07:24 +0000</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Zachary Shahan</dc:creator>
    
		<category><![CDATA[Climate Change]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[alternative fuels]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[global warming]]></category>

    <guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/2009/10/28/is-global-scale-biofuels-production-good-or-bad-for-climate-change/</guid>
    <description><![CDATA[<p><a href='http://cleantechnica.com/files/2009/10/biofuel.jpg'><img src="http://go635254.s3.amazonaws.com/cleantechnica/files/2009/10/biofuel.jpg" alt="" width="500" height="375" class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-3831" /></a><br />
There has been a lot of discussion over the last few years about biofuels and whether or not they are actually green, especially when produced on a large, global level.</p>

<p>A new study led by Marine Biological Laboratory (MBL) senior scientist Jerry Melillo says <strong>no, they aren&#8217;t green</strong> (when it comes to climate change). However, there are still many important factors to keep in mind before claiming this is the end of a long and <a href="http://gas2.org/2008/07/17/opinion-biofuels-food-prices-and-global-warming-roundup/comment-page-1/">complicated</a> discussion.</p>
<p><a href="http://cleantechnica.com/2009/10/28/is-global-scale-biofuels-production-good-or-bad-for-climate-change/" class="more-link">Read more of this story &#187;</a></p>
]]></description>
    <wfw:commentRss>http://cleantechnica.com/2009/10/28/is-global-scale-biofuels-production-good-or-bad-for-climate-change/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
  </item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- 694 queries in 2.316 seconds. -->