<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
  xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
  xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
  >

<channel>
  <title>Green Options &#187; industrial agriculture</title>
  <link>http://greenoptions.com/tag/industrial-agriculture</link>
  <description>Posts tagged 'industrial agriculture'</description>
  <pubDate>Sun, 26 Jul 2009 17:17:19 +0000</pubDate>
  <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
  <language>en</language>
  <item>
    <title>No Love for Animals &#8212; 0.1% of European Union Budget!</title>
    <link>http://ecoworldly.com/2009/07/26/no-love-for-animals-01-of-european-union-budget/</link>
    <comments>http://ecoworldly.com/2009/07/26/no-love-for-animals-01-of-european-union-budget/#comments</comments>
    <pubDate>Sun, 26 Jul 2009 17:17:19 +0000</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Zachary Shahan</dc:creator>
    
		<category><![CDATA[About Animals]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[About Climate]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[About Environment]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[About Politics]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[About Science]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[In Europe]]></category>

    <guid isPermaLink="false">http://ecoworldly.com/2009/07/26/no-love-for-animals-01-of-european-union-budget/</guid>
    <description><![CDATA[<p><a href='http://ecoworldly.com/files/2009/07/bluegoat.jpg'><img src="http://go635254.s3.amazonaws.com/ecoworldly/files/2009/07/bluegoat.jpg" alt="" width="448" height="331" class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-3308" /></a><br />
<strong>The European Union got strongly admonished this month by the <a href="http://www.panda.org/about_our_earth/blue_planet/news/?170082/Tiny-fraction-of-EU-budget-safeguards-wildlife">World Wildlife Fund (WWF)</a> after the release of <a href="http://biodiversity.eionet.europa.eu/article17">a report</a> that is more than a decade late and comes to disheartening conclusions. The EU is giving only 0.1% of its budget to nature protection, with <em>drastic</em> consequences. Due to the miniscule investment in protecting wildlife, more than half of European habitats and species are under threat of extinction.</strong></p>
<p><a href="http://ecoworldly.com/2009/07/26/no-love-for-animals-01-of-european-union-budget/" class="more-link">Read more of this story &#187;</a></p>
]]></description>
    <wfw:commentRss>http://ecoworldly.com/2009/07/26/no-love-for-animals-01-of-european-union-budget/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>Pesticides Are Problematic for Older Kids, Too</title>
    <link>http://ecochildsplay.com/2009/07/22/pesticides-are-problematic-for-older-kids-too/</link>
    <comments>http://ecochildsplay.com/2009/07/22/pesticides-are-problematic-for-older-kids-too/#comments</comments>
    <pubDate>Wed, 22 Jul 2009 13:59:27 +0000</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Cate Nelson</dc:creator>
    
		<category><![CDATA[Gardening]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Health]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Other Environmental Topics]]></category>

    <guid isPermaLink="false">http://ecochildsplay.com/2009/07/22/pesticides-are-problematic-for-older-kids-too/</guid>
    <description><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://ecochildsplay.com/files/2009/07/pesticide-spraying.jpg"><img class="alignnone size-medium wp-image-4097" src="http://go635254.s3.amazonaws.com/ecochildsplay/files/2009/07/pesticide-spraying-300x284.jpg" alt="" width="300" height="284" /></a> We used to think that kids were <a href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16112327">susceptible to pesticides until age 2</a>. Now, researchers <span style="text-decoration: line-through">who are apparently trying to freak us out again</span> have discovered that the toxic affects of pesticides are pervasive until age 7.</p>
<p><strong>The kids are lacking a particular enzyme until they reach that birthday, one called paraoxonase. Adults have this enzyme, but the kiddos don’t. And this is crucial to help the body neutralize and eliminate specific <a href="http://ecolocalizer.com/2008/02/27/tackling-the-toxic-problem-of-pesticides/">pesticides</a>.</strong></p>
<p>So you may be <a href="http://sustainablog.org/2008/05/12/low-impact-living-twelve-tips-for-eco-friendly-lawn-care/">chem-free</a> at your house, but this is all the more reason to <a href="http://ecochildsplay.com/2009/02/02/save-money-while-buying-organic/">go organic</a> for any produce you can&#8212;and know what the farms near you use on their fields.</p>
<p><a href="http://ecochildsplay.com/2009/07/22/pesticides-are-problematic-for-older-kids-too/" class="more-link">Read more of this story &#187;</a></p>
]]></description>
    <wfw:commentRss>http://ecochildsplay.com/2009/07/22/pesticides-are-problematic-for-older-kids-too/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>Reports Show Less Water Used In Organic Farming</title>
    <link>http://ecoworldly.com/2008/11/13/reports-show-less-water-used-in-organic-farming/</link>
    <comments>http://ecoworldly.com/2008/11/13/reports-show-less-water-used-in-organic-farming/#comments</comments>
    <pubDate>Thu, 13 Nov 2008 23:52:11 +0000</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Nayelli Gonzalez</dc:creator>
    
		<category><![CDATA[In Global]]></category>

    <guid isPermaLink="false">http://ecoworldly.com/2008/11/13/reports-show-less-water-used-in-organic-farming/</guid>
    <description><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://ecoworldly.com/files/2008/11/irrigation.jpg"><img class="alignleft alignnone size-medium wp-image-1990" style="float: left" src="http://go635254.s3.amazonaws.com/ecoworldly/files/2008/11/irrigation-300x195.jpg" alt="" width="300" height="195" /></a></p>
<p><em>Note: This article is part of EcoWorldly&#8217;s <a href="http://ecoworldly.com/2008/11/11/happy-harvest-from-ecoworldly/">series</a> on food and agriculture around the world.  In the spirit of Thanksgiving, this week EcoWorldly writers are exploring environmental issues related to bringing food from the farm to your dinner plate.</em></p>
<p>Sellers of organic products all say the same thing: their products are better for our health and for the environment.  So if you&#8217;re planning on chowing on organic cranberries, yams and free-range turkeys this Thanksgiving, rest assured that your meal is good for you and Mother Earth on a different level.  Organic farming also uses less water than commercial farming methods.</p>
<p>Large quantities of water are used for farming around the world, and some environmentalists argue this has contributed to the global water crisis.  According to <a href="http://www.peopleandplanet.net/doc.php?id=346">PeopleandPlanet.net</a>, over two-thirds of the freshwater used by humans annually around the world is used for crop irrigation.  In Africa, for example, the Nile River loses <a href="http://www.peopleandplanet.net/doc.php?id=346">90 percent</a> of its water for irrigation purposes before it reaches the Mediterranean Sea.  In Asia, which contains two-thirds of the world’s irrigated land, <a href="http://www.peopleandplanet.net/doc.php?id=346">85 percent</a> of available water is used for irrigation.  And in California, 80 percent of the water withdrawn for state water projects is used for agriculture.  The remaining 20 percent is used for residential, commercial, institutional and industrial use, according to a <a href="http://www.pacinst.org/reports/more_with_less_delta/more_with_less.pdf">report</a> released by the environmental research and advocacy group <a href="http://www.pacinst.org/">Pacific Institute</a>.</p>
<p><a href="http://ecoworldly.com/2008/11/13/reports-show-less-water-used-in-organic-farming/" class="more-link">Read more of this story &#187;</a></p>
]]></description>
    <wfw:commentRss>http://ecoworldly.com/2008/11/13/reports-show-less-water-used-in-organic-farming/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>Edible Activism: Changing the World Through What We Eat</title>
    <link>http://planetsave.com/blog/2008/07/25/edible-activism-changing-the-world-through-what-we-eat/</link>
    <comments>http://planetsave.com/blog/2008/07/25/edible-activism-changing-the-world-through-what-we-eat/#comments</comments>
    <pubDate>Fri, 25 Jul 2008 21:44:20 +0000</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Megan Prusynski</dc:creator>
    
		<category><![CDATA[Culture]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Energy &amp; Fuel]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Health]]></category>

    <guid isPermaLink="false">http://planetsave.com/blog/2008/07/25/edible-activism-changing-the-world-through-what-we-eat/</guid>
    <description><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://planetsave.com/files/2008/07/picking_broccoli.jpg"><img class="alignleft size-full wp-image-2736" src="http://go635254.s3.amazonaws.com/planetsave/files/2008/07/picking_broccoli.jpg" alt="" width="300" height="300" /></a>For as often as we do eat, it seems as if most of us don&#8217;t think too much about what we&#8217;re putting into our bodies. With food production so far removed from our every day lives, it&#8217;s easy to ignore where our food comes from and what it&#8217;s impact may be. But what we put on our plates has a larger footprint than what we drive. According to the <a title="FAO" href="http://www.fao.org/ag/magazine/0612sp1.htm">Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations</a>,</p>
<blockquote><p>&#8220;Livestock production is one of the major causes of the world&#8217;s most pressing environmental problems, including global warming, land degradation, air and water pollution, and loss of biodiversity. Using a methodology that considers the entire commodity chain, it estimates that livestock are responsible for 18 percent of greenhouse gas emissions, a bigger share than that of transport.&#8221;</p></blockquote>
<p>The things we choose to eat can obviously have an enormous impact on the planet and everything on it, including ourselves. Naturally then, our diet choices can say a lot about our ethics and beliefs. They can even be a political statement and a form of activism. I think that every choice we make has the potential to change the world, and certainly what I choose to eat has an impact.
<p><a href="http://planetsave.com/blog/2008/07/25/edible-activism-changing-the-world-through-what-we-eat/" class="more-link">Read more of this story &#187;</a></p>
]]></description>
    <wfw:commentRss>http://planetsave.com/blog/2008/07/25/edible-activism-changing-the-world-through-what-we-eat/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>Where Issues Intertwine: Why Animals Matter</title>
    <link>http://planetsave.com/blog/2008/05/30/where-issues-intertwine-why-animals-matter/</link>
    <comments>http://planetsave.com/blog/2008/05/30/where-issues-intertwine-why-animals-matter/#comments</comments>
    <pubDate>Fri, 30 May 2008 08:58:30 +0000</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Megan Prusynski</dc:creator>
    
		<category><![CDATA[Nature &amp; Conservation]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Video &amp; Media]]></category>

    <guid isPermaLink="false">http://planetsave.com/blog/2008/05/30/where-issues-intertwine-why-animals-matter/</guid>
    <description><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://go635254.s3.amazonaws.com/planetsave/files/2008/05/why_animals_matter.jpg" alt="Why Animals Matter book" align="left" />I&#8217;ve always thought that many of the issues I am concerned about—the environment, human rights, peace, overconsumption, animal welfare—are all really one big issue. Everywhere I look I see countless connections between many social, political, and environmental issues. I may be involved in many separate causes, but they overlap so often that I feel that I&#8217;m really just part of one big movement. Which is why when someone asks me why I&#8217;m vegetarian, I am so overwhelmed with reasons that I don&#8217;t know where to even start explaining. The top ones are the environment, animal rights, and health, but no matter what you call them, they&#8217;re all one big issue to me.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m not the only one who has noticed this overlap, of course. And rarely have I encountered such a thorough examination of the connections between animal welfare and just about every other issue that concerns me than in the book <a href="http://www.whyanimalsmatter.com/" title="Why Animals Matter"><em>Why Animals Matter</em></a> by Erin E. Williams and Margo DeMello.
<p><a href="http://planetsave.com/blog/2008/05/30/where-issues-intertwine-why-animals-matter/" class="more-link">Read more of this story &#187;</a></p>
]]></description>
    <wfw:commentRss>http://planetsave.com/blog/2008/05/30/where-issues-intertwine-why-animals-matter/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>If Things Fall Apart, What Will You Eat?</title>
    <link>http://eatdrinkbetter.com/2008/03/21/if-things-fall-apart-what-will-you-eat/</link>
    <comments>http://eatdrinkbetter.com/2008/03/21/if-things-fall-apart-what-will-you-eat/#comments</comments>
    <pubDate>Fri, 21 Mar 2008 20:56:02 +0000</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Carla Wise</dc:creator>
    
		<category><![CDATA[Eat.Drink.Better]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[food safety]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[local food]]></category>

    <guid isPermaLink="false">http://eatdrinkbetter.com/2008/03/21/if-things-fall-apart-what-will-you-eat/</guid>
    <description><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://go635254.s3.amazonaws.com/eatdrinkbetter/files/2008/03/350832607_19acf85029_m.jpg" alt="350832607_19acf85029_m.jpg" align="left" />Maybe we really have reached our limits.  <a href="http://www.davidkorten.org">David Korten</a>, author, lecturer, and founder of <a href="http://www.yesmagazine.org">Yes</a> magazine, believes we have.   He believes that climate change, peak oil, and the meltdown of the U.S. dollar are all symptoms of the impending fall of our modern, globalized way of life.  And he has a point.  The stock market is crashing, gas and food prices are skyrocketing, and our economy is faltering.  Of course, if you are an optimist, you might say, well, we will survive, as we have before.  Except for one thing: what will we eat?</p>
<p>When I take stock, I realize I can do without most of the things I buy.  Yesterday I bought gas, printer cartridges, and mad libs for my daughter.  Food was the only necessity I spent money on.  But if David Korten is onto something, access to most of that food is in danger.</p>
<p>Consider: by most estimates, 98% of the food consumed by Americans comes from the industrial food system.
<p><a href="http://eatdrinkbetter.com/2008/03/21/if-things-fall-apart-what-will-you-eat/" class="more-link">Read more of this story &#187;</a></p>
]]></description>
    <wfw:commentRss>http://eatdrinkbetter.com/2008/03/21/if-things-fall-apart-what-will-you-eat/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>A Minnesota Farmer Takes on Farm Subsidies, and Creates a Stir</title>
    <link>http://eatdrinkbetter.com/2008/03/06/a-minnesota-farmer-takes-on-farm-subsidies-and-creates-a-stir/</link>
    <comments>http://eatdrinkbetter.com/2008/03/06/a-minnesota-farmer-takes-on-farm-subsidies-and-creates-a-stir/#comments</comments>
    <pubDate>Thu, 06 Mar 2008 22:07:46 +0000</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Carla Wise</dc:creator>
    
		<category><![CDATA[agriculture]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[local food]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[organics]]></category>

    <guid isPermaLink="false">http://eatdrinkbetter.com/2008/03/06/a-minnesota-farmer-takes-on-farm-subsidies-and-creates-a-stir/</guid>
    <description><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://go635254.s3.amazonaws.com/eatdrinkbetter/files/2008/03/vegetables.jpg" alt="vegetables.jpg" align="left" />Jack Hedin is a Minnesota organic farmer who grows food for local markets.  He wants to expand his operation to help meet the growing demand for his produce.    The way he sees it, the federal government is standing directly in his way, and he&#8217;s upset about it.   So he sent an <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2008/03/01/opinion/01hedin.html?ex=1205298000&#38;en=3e157aac557a11db&#38;ei=5070&#38;emc=eta1">Op-Ed</a> to the <em>New York Times</em>, which  they published last week.  I imagine he was hoping to get people talking about our farm subsidy program and its impact on American food and farming.  Judging from my email inbox, he succeeded in spades.</p>
<p>Here&#8217;s a summary of Jack Hedin&#8217;s story.  He farms 100 acres in southern Minnesota, and has found that demand for his organic produce is so strong that he can&#8217;t meet it on his land.  So last year, he rented 25 acres from two nearby corn farmers, and planted fruits and vegetables on the extra land.   It wasn&#8217;t long before his landlords ran into trouble with the commodity farm program.   This program subsidizes commodity crops, paying farmers who grow corn, wheat, soybeans, rice, cotton, and several others.</p>
<p>While the program was set up to guarantee farmers who grow commodity crops a certain income, it turns out that it also penalizes farmers who then switch to growing fruits and vegetables on &#8220;commodity base&#8221; acres.  This is what happened to the farmers who had rented him the 25 acres.  They found themselves out of compliance with the commodity farm program, and would be penalized not only for the subsidy that year for that acreage, but also for the market value of the &#8220;illicit&#8221; crops.
<p><a href="http://eatdrinkbetter.com/2008/03/06/a-minnesota-farmer-takes-on-farm-subsidies-and-creates-a-stir/" class="more-link">Read more of this story &#187;</a></p>
]]></description>
    <wfw:commentRss>http://eatdrinkbetter.com/2008/03/06/a-minnesota-farmer-takes-on-farm-subsidies-and-creates-a-stir/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
  </item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- 296 queries in 0.813 seconds. -->