<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
  xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
  xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
  >

<channel>
  <title>Green Options &#187; Islamic Relief</title>
  <link>http://greenoptions.com/tag/islamic-relief</link>
  <description>Posts tagged 'Islamic Relief'</description>
  <pubDate>Tue, 02 Dec 2008 13:38:54 +0000</pubDate>
  <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
  <language>en</language>
  <item>
    <title>Charity Wash? Facebook Supports Questionable Charities</title>
    <link>http://ecopreneurist.com/2008/12/02/charity-wash-facebook-supports-questionable-charities/</link>
    <comments>http://ecopreneurist.com/2008/12/02/charity-wash-facebook-supports-questionable-charities/#comments</comments>
    <pubDate>Tue, 02 Dec 2008 13:38:54 +0000</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Jennifer Kaplan</dc:creator>
    
		<category><![CDATA[Social entrepreneurs]]></category>

    <guid isPermaLink="false">http://ecopreneurist.com/2008/12/02/charity-wash-facebook-supports-questionable-charities/</guid>
    <description><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://ecopreneurist.com/files/2008/12/facebook_128.png"><img class="alignright size-medium wp-image-984" src="http://go635254.s3.amazonaws.com/ecopreneurist/files/2008/12/facebook_128.png" alt="" width="128" height="128" /></a></p>
<h3> Tis&#8217; the season to donate and if you&#8217;re so inclined there are lots of folks trying to help you do it.  Facebook has jumped into the game with an application to give <a href="http://apps.facebook.com/causes/giftings/new?m=8f032fc7">Facebook Charity Gifts</a>.  Through the app, you make a donation as a gift in a friend&#8217;s name and your friend receives a nifty icon on their Facebook page.  Sounds like a great proposition, right?  The problem is that <a href="http://www.facebook.com">Facebook</a> did not do its homework on all these nonprofits.</h3>
<p>A quick check on <a href="http://www.charitynavigator.org/index.cfm?bay=search.results&#38;overallrtg=4">Charity Navigator</a> reveals that only seven of the twenty-one nonprofits (33%) were given 4-star ratings: <a href="http://www.redcross.org">American National Red Cross</a>, <a href="http://www.one-economy.com">One Economy Corporation</a>, <a href="http://www.healthebay.org">Heal the Bay</a>,<a href="http://www.irw.org"> Islamic Relief</a>, <a href="http://www.mercycorps.org">MERCY CORPS</a>, <a href="http://www.hsus.org">Humane Society of The United States</a> and <a href="http://www.unicefusa.org">United States Fund for UNICEF</a>. One group earned 3-stars (&#8221;good&#8221;), two groups earned 2-stars (&#8221;fair&#8221;), two are hospitals (and not 501c3 charities)<em>[CORRECTION: the hospitals are both in fact 501c3s]</em> and seven groups were not even rated, including one group with no website <em>[CORRECTION: LOVEFUTBOL does have a very nice <a href="http://www.lovefutbol.org/">website</a>]</em>, no HQ and listed &#8220;c/o&#8221; someone who apparently lives around the corner from me. I should add that looking at the rating is not always enough.  As a reader named David pointed out in a comment to the post last week, notwithstanding its 4-star rating, UNICEF has its own questionable practices.</p>
<p><a href="http://ecopreneurist.com/2008/12/02/charity-wash-facebook-supports-questionable-charities/" class="more-link">Read more of this story &#187;</a></p>
]]></description>
    <wfw:commentRss>http://ecopreneurist.com/2008/12/02/charity-wash-facebook-supports-questionable-charities/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
  </item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- 95 queries in 0.344 seconds. -->