<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
  xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
  xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
  >

<channel>
  <title>Green Options &#187; Joe Biden</title>
  <link>http://greenoptions.com/tag/joe-biden</link>
  <description>Posts tagged 'Joe Biden'</description>
  <pubDate>Wed, 28 Oct 2009 19:30:42 +0000</pubDate>
  <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
  <language>en</language>
  <item>
    <title>Foot-In-Mouth Disease Reigns: Biden Reveals Fisker&#8217;s Future Business Plans</title>
    <link>http://gas2.org/2009/10/28/foot-in-mouth-disease-reigns-biden-reveals-fiskers-future-business-plans/</link>
    <comments>http://gas2.org/2009/10/28/foot-in-mouth-disease-reigns-biden-reveals-fiskers-future-business-plans/#comments</comments>
    <pubDate>Wed, 28 Oct 2009 19:30:42 +0000</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Nick Chambers</dc:creator>
    
		<category><![CDATA[Plug-in hybrid EVs]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>

    <guid isPermaLink="false">http://gas2.org/2009/10/28/foot-in-mouth-disease-reigns-biden-reveals-fiskers-future-business-plans/</guid>
    <description><![CDATA[<h3><img class="alignnone size-full wp-image-3946 alignleft" style="float: left" src="http://go635254.s3.amazonaws.com/gas2/files/2009/10/biden.jpg" alt="" width="240" height="367" />Swine Flu&#8217;s got nothing on our Vice President&#8217;s case of <a href="http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=foot%20in%20mouth%20disease" target="_blank">Foot-in-Mouth disease</a>.</h3>
<h3>If only there was a vaccine.</h3>
<p>Joe Biden is well-known for his goofball status of <a href="http://www.nydailynews.com/opinions/2009/05/01/2009-05-01_well_shut_his_mouth.html" target="_blank">saying exactly the wrong thing at exactly the wrong time</a> in, what we have to assume, is a genetic predisposition to unwittedness.</p>
<p>Take, for instance, <a href="http://gas2.org/2009/10/26/biden-to-announce-fisker-will-build-plug-ins-at-old-delaware-gm-plant/" target="_blank">yesterday&#8217;s announcement</a> that Fisker Automotive would be purchasing a shuttered Delaware GM plant for the future production of Fisker&#8217;s upcoming Project Nina plug-in hybrid—the more reasonably priced sister car of Fisker&#8217;s flagship $80,000 Karma.</p>
<p>During that announcement Biden—who&#8217;s home state is Delaware—waxed on about how the plant will bring jobs back to the area and is exactly what we need to get our manufacturing sector back on line. But he just couldn&#8217;t hold himself back at the end of his speech, saying &#8220;<span>imagine when this factory, when the floor we’re standing on right now is making 100,000 plug-in hybrid sedans, coupes and crossovers every single year.&#8221;</span></p>
<p><a href="http://gas2.org/2009/10/28/foot-in-mouth-disease-reigns-biden-reveals-fiskers-future-business-plans/" class="more-link">Read more of this story &#187;</a></p>
]]></description>
    <wfw:commentRss>http://gas2.org/2009/10/28/foot-in-mouth-disease-reigns-biden-reveals-fiskers-future-business-plans/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>Biden to Announce Fisker Will Build Plug-Ins at Old Delaware GM Plant</title>
    <link>http://gas2.org/2009/10/26/biden-to-announce-fisker-will-build-plug-ins-at-old-delaware-gm-plant/</link>
    <comments>http://gas2.org/2009/10/26/biden-to-announce-fisker-will-build-plug-ins-at-old-delaware-gm-plant/#comments</comments>
    <pubDate>Mon, 26 Oct 2009 19:23:48 +0000</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Nick Chambers</dc:creator>
    
		<category><![CDATA[Plug-in hybrid EVs]]></category>

    <guid isPermaLink="false">http://gas2.org/2009/10/26/biden-to-announce-fisker-will-build-plug-ins-at-old-delaware-gm-plant/</guid>
    <description><![CDATA[<p style="text-align: center"><img class="alignnone size-full wp-image-3610 aligncenter" src="http://go635254.s3.amazonaws.com/gas2/files/2009/09/fisker-karma006.jpg" alt="" width="500" height="333" /></p>

<p>Last week, <a href="http://gas2.org/2008/12/02/fisker-reveals-production-version-of-luxury-electric-car/" target="_blank">Fisker Automotive</a> co-founder and CEO, Henrik Fisker, <a href="http://www.google.com/hostednews/ap/article/ALeqM5j6ZzZOiZq-4Ngwz4bZyNB7iV-yrAD9BETERG1" target="_blank">said</a> that his company would very shortly be announcing where project Nina—the company&#8217;s upcoming $48,000 plug-in hybrid—would be built. The statement led to all sorts of rumors, but speculation had been growing that the chosen manufacturing spot was a closed GM plant in Delaware.</p>
<p><a href="http://gas2.org/2009/10/26/biden-to-announce-fisker-will-build-plug-ins-at-old-delaware-gm-plant/" class="more-link">Read more of this story &#187;</a></p>
]]></description>
    <wfw:commentRss>http://gas2.org/2009/10/26/biden-to-announce-fisker-will-build-plug-ins-at-old-delaware-gm-plant/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>Is Social Security &#8220;Windfall&#8221; Penalty Fair to Labor?</title>
    <link>http://inspiredeconomist.com/2009/09/07/is-social-security-windfall-penalty-fair-to-labor/</link>
    <comments>http://inspiredeconomist.com/2009/09/07/is-social-security-windfall-penalty-fair-to-labor/#comments</comments>
    <pubDate>Mon, 07 Sep 2009 20:24:27 +0000</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Fred Etcheverry</dc:creator>
    
		<category><![CDATA[Jobs]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Opinion]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Policies]]></category>

    <guid isPermaLink="false">http://inspiredeconomist.com/2009/09/07/is-social-security-windfall-penalty-fair-to-labor/</guid>
    <description><![CDATA[<h3><a href="http://inspiredeconomist.com/files/2009/09/thumbnail1.jpg"><img class="alignleft size-medium wp-image-1636" src="http://go635254.s3.amazonaws.com/inspiredeconomist/files/2009/09/thumbnail1.jpg" alt="" width="152" height="160" /></a></h3>
<h3>The Texas American Federation of Teachers <a href="http://tx.aft.org/?action=article&#38;articleid=0556c200-9453-4962-8693-223e1be6d02c" target="_blank">(AFT)</a> cites the case of a widowed public school teacher that retired with a $900 monthly pension. She would have been eligible to receive $600 survivor benefits based on her husband&#8217;s Social Security contribution, but the windfall elimination provision (WEP) eliminated all of her survivor benefits. What is WEP?</h3>
<p>The Reagan administration believed that reducing taxes would boost the economy. According to this &#8220;supply side&#8221; economic theory, less tax meant more profits, which would be plowed back into in to the private sector creating jobs and goods. The theory didn&#8217;t work and the deficit soared.</p>
<p>The administration looked for &#8220;revenue enhancements&#8221; that wouldn&#8217;t look like taxes (at least not taxes on business) to buy time for its theory to work. Social Security became a target of this quest. Especially, Social Security benefits received by public employees.</p>
<p><a href="http://inspiredeconomist.com/2009/09/07/is-social-security-windfall-penalty-fair-to-labor/" class="more-link">Read more of this story &#187;</a></p>
]]></description>
    <wfw:commentRss>http://inspiredeconomist.com/2009/09/07/is-social-security-windfall-penalty-fair-to-labor/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>Environmental Defense Fund: Less Carbon, More Jobs in the New Green Economy</title>
    <link>http://sustainablog.org/2009/03/02/environmental-defense-fund-less-carbon-more-jobs-in-the-new-green-economy/</link>
    <comments>http://sustainablog.org/2009/03/02/environmental-defense-fund-less-carbon-more-jobs-in-the-new-green-economy/#comments</comments>
    <pubDate>Mon, 02 Mar 2009 19:39:54 +0000</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>edfblog</dc:creator>
    
		<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Climate change]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Energy &amp; Fuel]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Environmental Policies]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Green Building &amp; Construction]]></category>

    <guid isPermaLink="false">http://sustainablog.org/2009/03/02/environmental-defense-fund-less-carbon-more-jobs-in-the-new-green-economy/</guid>
    <description><![CDATA[<p><a title="link to Less Carbon, More Jobs" href="http://www.edf.org/page.cfm?tagID=33427" target="_blank"><img class="alignleft size-medium wp-image-4247" src="http://go635254.s3.amazonaws.com/sustainablog/files/2009/03/green_jobs_map_248.jpg" alt="Less Carbon, More Jobs" width="248" height="200" /></a></p>
<h4>One bright spot on the dark economic horizon is the number of companies across the U.S. poised for growth under a cap on carbon. EDF president Fred Krupp joined Vice President Joe Biden Friday in Philadelphia for the first meeting of <a href="http://www.whitehouse.gov/the_press_office/Middle-Class-Task-Force-Holds-First-Meeting-in-Philadelphia-Focus-is-on-Green-Jobs/">Biden’s task force on middle class jobs</a>.</h4>
<p>At the meeting we unveiled our <a href="http://www.edf.org/page.cfm?tagID=33427">new interactive map</a> highlighting more than 1,200 companies in coal country, the rust belt and other manufacturing regions. These companies all stand to benefit from the demand for clean energy technologies created by a cap on global warming pollution.</p>
<p><a href="http://sustainablog.org/2009/03/02/environmental-defense-fund-less-carbon-more-jobs-in-the-new-green-economy/" class="more-link">Read more of this story &#187;</a></p>
]]></description>
    <wfw:commentRss>http://sustainablog.org/2009/03/02/environmental-defense-fund-less-carbon-more-jobs-in-the-new-green-economy/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>Wolves in Green Fleece: Are “Clean Coal” Ads a Scam?</title>
    <link>http://inspiredeconomist.com/2009/01/12/wolves-in-green-fleece-are-%e2%80%9cclean-coal%e2%80%9d-ads-a-scam/</link>
    <comments>http://inspiredeconomist.com/2009/01/12/wolves-in-green-fleece-are-%e2%80%9cclean-coal%e2%80%9d-ads-a-scam/#comments</comments>
    <pubDate>Mon, 12 Jan 2009 19:00:27 +0000</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Fred Etcheverry</dc:creator>
    
		<category><![CDATA[Energy]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Opinion]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>

    <guid isPermaLink="false">http://inspiredeconomist.com/2009/01/12/wolves-in-green-fleece-are-%e2%80%9cclean-coal%e2%80%9d-ads-a-scam/</guid>
    <description><![CDATA[<h3 style="text-align: center"><a href="None"><img class="size-full wp-image-1065 aligncenter" src="http://go635254.s3.amazonaws.com/inspiredeconomist/files/2009/01/164341428_3243f5001213.jpg" alt="Coal Plany" width="502" height="301" /></a></h3>
<h3>Corporate image ads are scattered around political news. They&#8217;re often masked as green tech, but their pitch more often advances corporate self-interest. We might dismiss them as hype, but they often succeed in pulling the wool over the public&#8217;s eyes.</h3>
<p>As the news reports a <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2008/12/27/us/27sludge.html?bl&#38;ex=1230613200&#38;en=dca39d677a5bac74%0A" target="_blank">fly ash (burned coal) spill </a>in Tennessee that may be the greatest environmental catastrophe, the coal industry continues to pitch &#8220;Clean Coal.&#8221; During the presidential campaigns, both Obama and McCain supported clean coal, as do most of the Democratic and Republican representatives.</p>
<p><a href="http://inspiredeconomist.com/2009/01/12/wolves-in-green-fleece-are-%e2%80%9cclean-coal%e2%80%9d-ads-a-scam/" class="more-link">Read more of this story &#187;</a></p>
]]></description>
    <wfw:commentRss>http://inspiredeconomist.com/2009/01/12/wolves-in-green-fleece-are-%e2%80%9cclean-coal%e2%80%9d-ads-a-scam/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>Begin to Focus Attention Here:  Barack Obama as President</title>
    <link>http://planetsave.com/blog/2008/10/27/begin-to-focus-your-attention-here-barack-obama-as-president/</link>
    <comments>http://planetsave.com/blog/2008/10/27/begin-to-focus-your-attention-here-barack-obama-as-president/#comments</comments>
    <pubDate>Mon, 27 Oct 2008 00:00:50 +0000</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Meg Hamill</dc:creator>
    
		<category><![CDATA[Planetsave]]></category>

    <guid isPermaLink="false">http://planetsave.com/blog/2008/10/27/begin-to-focus-your-attention-here-barack-obama-as-president/</guid>
    <description><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://planetsave.com/files/2008/10/400px-obama_portrait_2006.jpg"><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-3155" src="http://go635254.s3.amazonaws.com/planetsave/files/2008/10/400px-obama_portrait_2006.jpg" alt="" width="330" height="495" /></a>I got an e-mail today from an unknown author that is worth passing on.  Parts of it are copied here, alongside my own personal thoughts.</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t know how much you know about the <a href="http://www.law-of-attraction-info.com/">Law of Attraction</a> or if you&#8217;ve ever heard of it. But surely you&#8217;ve heard of the phrase, &#8216;What you resist, persists.&#8217; The more we don&#8217;t want something, the more it finds us. For example - the more we resist forming relationships with a certain type of person in our lives, the more we attract that same kind of relationship over and over again.  The more we resisted<a href="http://eatdrinkbetter.com/2008/04/30/say-what/"> President Bush,</a> the more he stayed in office.  I truly believe that the reason he won two terms as President is because everyone from all sides was so intently focused on him&#8211; <a href="http://redgreenandblue.org/2008/08/29/convention-conservation-can-democrats-win-the-west-finally/">Democrats</a> with negative energy and <a href="http://redgreenandblue.org/2008/09/03/republicans-work-to-reconcile-mccains-climate-change-position-with-their-oil-platform/">Republicans</a> with positive energy.
<p><a href="http://planetsave.com/blog/2008/10/27/begin-to-focus-your-attention-here-barack-obama-as-president/" class="more-link">Read more of this story &#187;</a></p>
]]></description>
    <wfw:commentRss>http://planetsave.com/blog/2008/10/27/begin-to-focus-your-attention-here-barack-obama-as-president/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>Election Countdown: Obama or McCain For A Green Economy?</title>
    <link>http://inspiredeconomist.com/2008/10/21/election-countdown-obama-or-mccain-for-a-green-economy/</link>
    <comments>http://inspiredeconomist.com/2008/10/21/election-countdown-obama-or-mccain-for-a-green-economy/#comments</comments>
    <pubDate>Wed, 22 Oct 2008 02:27:11 +0000</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Reenita Malhotra</dc:creator>
    
		<category><![CDATA[Opinion]]></category>

    <guid isPermaLink="false">http://inspiredeconomist.com/2008/10/21/election-countdown-obama-or-mccain-for-a-green-economy/</guid>
    <description><![CDATA[<p><strong>With fourteen days left until the U.S. presidential election, the heat is on. As much as all eyes are on the candidates, everybody&#8217;s pulse is on the <a href="http://inspiredeconomist.com/2008/10/16/gdp-vs-gpi-which-measures-the-economy-best/" target="_blank">economy</a>. People all over America are wondering <a href="http://redgreenandblue.org/2008/10/15/obama-vs-mccain-who-will-better-serve-the-us-economy/#comment-10975" target="_blank">who will better serve the U.S. Economy</a> and bring it to where it needs to be. What are the candidates saying?</strong><img class="alignleft" style="float: left" src="http://go635254.s3.amazonaws.com/inspiredeconomist/files/2008/10/images.jpg" alt="" width="98" height="74" /></p>
<p><strong>John McCain says that Barack Obama&#8217;s tax policy is not conducive to <a href="http://greenbuildingelements.com/2008/10/01/senate-bailout-plan-could-be-boon-for-alternative-energies-home-solar/" target="_blank">building</a> a strong economy. Obama says he wants to spread the wealth around.  Joe Biden calls it &#8220;patriotic&#8221; for the wealthy to pay taxes, <a title="Obama vs. McCain - Who Will Better Support Joe The Plumber" href="http://inspiredeconomist.com/2008/10/15/obama-vs-mccain-who-will-better-support-joe-the-plumber/">Joe The Plumber</a> calls that socialism.</strong>
<p><a href="http://inspiredeconomist.com/2008/10/21/election-countdown-obama-or-mccain-for-a-green-economy/" class="more-link">Read more of this story &#187;</a></p>
]]></description>
    <wfw:commentRss>http://inspiredeconomist.com/2008/10/21/election-countdown-obama-or-mccain-for-a-green-economy/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>Another Inconvenient Truth: Are We Too Divided to Close the Ideological Gap?</title>
    <link>http://sustainablog.org/2008/10/16/another-inconvenient-truth-are-we-too-divided-to-close-the-idealogoical-gap/</link>
    <comments>http://sustainablog.org/2008/10/16/another-inconvenient-truth-are-we-too-divided-to-close-the-idealogoical-gap/#comments</comments>
    <pubDate>Thu, 16 Oct 2008 11:28:16 +0000</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Adam Williams</dc:creator>
    
		<category><![CDATA[Climate change]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Science]]></category>

    <guid isPermaLink="false">http://sustainablog.org/2008/10/16/another-inconvenient-truth-are-we-too-divided-to-close-the-idealogoical-gap/</guid>
    <description><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://sustainablog.org/files/2008/08/aninconvenienttruth.jpg"><img class="alignright size-full wp-image-3308" src="http://go635254.s3.amazonaws.com/sustainablog/files/2008/08/aninconvenienttruth.jpg" alt="" width="300" height="225" /></a>Some days my hope wavers that this polarized American society can get anywhere meaningful. The communication gap is so wide and prickly. That goes for environmental issues, political ones, cultural ones and any other kinds of ones. Sometimes it just seems hopeless to me. Or at least very fatiguing.</p>
<p>Consider my most recent sustainablog post &#8212; <a href="http://sustainablog.org/2008/10/12/nasa-maps-global-co2-patterns-produces-more-science-for-nonbelievers-to-dispute/" target="_blank">NASA Maps Global CO2 Patterns; Produces More Science for Nonbelievers to Dispute</a>.</p>
<p>I showed some exasperation in that post, too. I wondered how science, a system based on factual discovery as means of proving (or disproving) a hypothesis, is so controversial as it relates to environmental matters. I wondered &#8212; and continue to wonder &#8212; how two people can look at facts of science and pick and choose what to believe and then vehemently disagree with each other.
<p><a href="http://sustainablog.org/2008/10/16/another-inconvenient-truth-are-we-too-divided-to-close-the-idealogoical-gap/" class="more-link">Read more of this story &#187;</a></p>
]]></description>
    <wfw:commentRss>http://sustainablog.org/2008/10/16/another-inconvenient-truth-are-we-too-divided-to-close-the-idealogoical-gap/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>$700 Billion Bailout Includes Tax Credits For Renewable Energy Industries</title>
    <link>http://redgreenandblue.org/2008/10/04/700-billion-bailout-includes-tax-credits-for-renewable-energy-industries/</link>
    <comments>http://redgreenandblue.org/2008/10/04/700-billion-bailout-includes-tax-credits-for-renewable-energy-industries/#comments</comments>
    <pubDate>Sat, 04 Oct 2008 23:18:40 +0000</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Reenita Malhotra</dc:creator>
    
		<category><![CDATA[Center]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Climate Change]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Energy]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Leader]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Policy]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[US Election]]></category>

    <guid isPermaLink="false">http://redgreenandblue.org/2008/10/04/700-billion-bailout-includes-tax-credits-for-renewable-energy-industries/</guid>
    <description><![CDATA[<p><img class="alignleft size-medium wp-image-1232" src="http://go635254.s3.amazonaws.com/redgreenandblue/files/2008/10/images-3.jpg" alt="" width="127" height="79" />Given the hue and cry that has been unleashed in America with regard to the bailout, there is finally <a href="http://www.alternativeenergyhq.com/solar-power/bailout-bill-includes-solar-tax-credits" target="_blank">good news for the renewable energy industry</a>. The <a href="http://www.house.gov/apps/list/press/financialsvcs_dem/press092808.shtml" target="_blank">Emergency Economic Stabilization Act of 2008</a>, passed by the House of Representatives with a vote of 263 to 171, and signed into law by President George Bush immediately afterwards, extends investment and production  tax credits for the wind and solar industries. The extensions will be partly paid for by a change in the tax code for the oil and gas industry.</p>
<p><a href="http://redgreenandblue.org/search/?q=congress+renewable+energy"><strong>&#62;&#62;More on renewable energy tax credits in Congress</strong></a>
<p><a href="http://redgreenandblue.org/2008/10/04/700-billion-bailout-includes-tax-credits-for-renewable-energy-industries/" class="more-link">Read more of this story &#187;</a></p>
]]></description>
    <wfw:commentRss>http://redgreenandblue.org/2008/10/04/700-billion-bailout-includes-tax-credits-for-renewable-energy-industries/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>Sarah Palin on Climate Change: The Causes Don&#8217;t Matter</title>
    <link>http://redgreenandblue.org/2008/10/03/sarah-palin-on-climate-change-the-causes-dont-matter/</link>
    <comments>http://redgreenandblue.org/2008/10/03/sarah-palin-on-climate-change-the-causes-dont-matter/#comments</comments>
    <pubDate>Sat, 04 Oct 2008 01:15:29 +0000</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Timothy B. Hurst</dc:creator>
    
		<category><![CDATA[Climate Change]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Leader]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Liberal]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[US Election]]></category>

    <guid isPermaLink="false">http://redgreenandblue.org/2008/10/03/sarah-palin-on-climate-change-the-causes-dont-matter/</guid>
    <description><![CDATA[<h3>When asked about climate change at the vice-presidential debate, Gov. Sarah Palin said, &#8220;I don&#8217;t want to argue about the causes. What I want to argue about is, how are we going to get there to positively affect the impacts?&#8221;</h3>
<p><a href="http://redgreenandblue.org/files/2008/10/sarahpalincollege.jpg"><img class="alignleft alignnone size-full wp-image-1224" style="float: left;margin-left: 2px;margin-right: 2px" src="http://go635254.s3.amazonaws.com/redgreenandblue/files/2008/10/sarahpalincollege.jpg" alt="sarah palin and her many colleges" width="300" height="307" /></a>Generally speaking, if we don&#8217;t know what the cause of a given problem is, but we know there is indeed a problem, how do we devise a strategy capable of adequately addressing it? Or, in the words of Gov. Palin, &#8220;&#8230;how are we going to get there to positively affect the impact&#8221; (whatever that means).</p>
<p>In Thursday night&#8217;s much-ballyhooed vice-presidential debate, the issue of climate change received a bit of attention, but neither candidate was really pushed to develop their statements much beyond their original answers (Biden on his recent comment in a rope-line that the Obama-Biden ticket <a href="http://redgreenandblue.org/2008/09/23/biden-no-new-coal-plants-in-us-video/">didn&#8217;t support clean coal</a> and Palin on her <a href="http://redgreenandblue.org/2008/09/16/palin-changes-position-on-global-warming-then-denies-it/">waffling position on the causes of climate change</a>). But the format didn&#8217;t really allow for deeper exploration either.</p>
<p><a href="http://redgreenandblue.org/search/?q=vice-presidential+debate"><strong>&#62;&#62;More on the vice-presidential debate at RG&#38;B</strong></a>
<p><a href="http://redgreenandblue.org/2008/10/03/sarah-palin-on-climate-change-the-causes-dont-matter/" class="more-link">Read more of this story &#187;</a></p>
]]></description>
    <wfw:commentRss>http://redgreenandblue.org/2008/10/03/sarah-palin-on-climate-change-the-causes-dont-matter/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>Vice-Presidential Debate: Palin vs. Biden On Global Warming</title>
    <link>http://redgreenandblue.org/2008/10/02/vice-presidential-debate-palin-vs-biden-on-global-warming/</link>
    <comments>http://redgreenandblue.org/2008/10/02/vice-presidential-debate-palin-vs-biden-on-global-warming/#comments</comments>
    <pubDate>Fri, 03 Oct 2008 06:32:39 +0000</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Reenita Malhotra</dc:creator>
    
		<category><![CDATA[Center]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Climate Change]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Choice]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Energy]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[US Election]]></category>

    <guid isPermaLink="false">http://redgreenandblue.org/2008/10/02/vice-presidential-debate-palin-vs-biden-on-global-warming/</guid>
    <description><![CDATA[<p><img class="alignleft size-medium wp-image-1215" style="float: left" src="http://go635254.s3.amazonaws.com/redgreenandblue/files/2008/10/1002debate06_s_20081002225406-300x225.jpg" alt="" width="200" height="150" />In the <a title="Vice-Presidential Debate" href="http://blogs.wsj.com/washwire/2008/10/02/who-won-the-vice-presidential-debate/?mod=googlenews_wsj" target="_blank">Vice Presidential debate</a> earlier this evening, <strong>Sarah Palin</strong> and <strong>Joe Biden</strong> each had a strong point of view on global warming. <strong>Gwen Ifill</strong>, the moderator, specifically questioned Palin about her views on carbon emissions and Biden about his view on clean coal technology.</p>
<p>Here are some key excerpts from the debate:</p>
<p> </p>
<p><strong>Sarah Palin</strong></p>
<ul>
<li>She confirmed that <strong>John McCain</strong> wants to put a cap on carbon emissions.</li>
<li>She said that the nation had to become &#8220;<em>energy independent</em>,&#8221; conserving fuel and clean up the planet.</li>
<li>She talked of America&#8217;s cry for tapping into domestic energy sources, saying they support a <em>&#8220;drill, baby, drill</em>&#8221; attitude as a measure for becoming energy independent</li>
<li>She criticized Biden for an overheard comment he made on a rope line that appeared to contradict <strong>Barack Obama’s</strong> support of building clean coal plants.
<p><a href="http://redgreenandblue.org/2008/10/02/vice-presidential-debate-palin-vs-biden-on-global-warming/" class="more-link">Read more of this story &#187;</a></p>
]]></description>
    <wfw:commentRss>http://redgreenandblue.org/2008/10/02/vice-presidential-debate-palin-vs-biden-on-global-warming/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>Canadian Challenge: Canadian Election Debate, or American Vice-Presidential Debate?</title>
    <link>http://redgreenandblue.org/2008/10/02/canadian-challenge-canadian-election-debate-or-american-vice-presidential-debate/</link>
    <comments>http://redgreenandblue.org/2008/10/02/canadian-challenge-canadian-election-debate-or-american-vice-presidential-debate/#comments</comments>
    <pubDate>Thu, 02 Oct 2008 16:13:42 +0000</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Amiel Blajchman</dc:creator>
    
		<category><![CDATA[Center]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Leader]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Other Politics]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[US Election]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[World]]></category>

    <guid isPermaLink="false">http://redgreenandblue.org/2008/10/02/canadian-challenge-canadian-election-debate-or-american-vice-presidential-debate/</guid>
    <description><![CDATA[<p><a title="Photo link" href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/ohiostate/2853751029/" target="_blank"><img class="alignleft size-medium wp-image-1196" src="http://go635254.s3.amazonaws.com/redgreenandblue/files/2008/10/double-flag-300x225.jpg" alt="Canada US Flags" width="300" height="225" /></a>Canadian political junkies are all busy programming their VCRs, Tivos, or getting all set up to Bittorrent tonight. Thanks to the vagaries of the <a title="Canada" href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Canada#Government_and_politics" target="_blank">Parliamentary process</a>, there is a Canadian election called for October 14th. And, similar to the Presidential debates that have been, and will be happening, the leaders of Canada’s five major parties:</p>
<ul>
<li><a title="Conservative Party" href="http://www.conservative.ca" target="_blank">Conservatives</a>,</li>
<li><a title="Liberal Party" href="http://www.liberal.ca" target="_blank">Liberals</a>,</li>
<li><a title="NDP" href="http://www.ndp.ca" target="_blank">NDP</a>,</li>
<li><a title="Bloc Quebecois" href="http://www.presentpourlequebec.org/accueil.aspx" target="_blank">Bloc Québécois</a>, and</li>
<li><a title="Green Party" href="http://www.greenparty.ca" target="_blank">Green</a></li>
</ul>
<p>are participating in back to back French and English language debates (you can read coverage of the <a title="Green Party participation in debates" href="http://redgreenandblue.org/2008/09/10/canadian-green-party-leader-in-the-debates/" target="_blank">debates</a> <a title="Canadian election debate" href="http://www.theglobeandmail.com/servlet/story/RTGAM.20081002.welxndionlead1002/BNStory/politics/home)" target="_blank">here</a>). For those readers who are wondering, Canada is officially bilingual, and therefore the major party leaders have a debate in each official language prior to the election.
<p><a href="http://redgreenandblue.org/2008/10/02/canadian-challenge-canadian-election-debate-or-american-vice-presidential-debate/" class="more-link">Read more of this story &#187;</a></p>
]]></description>
    <wfw:commentRss>http://redgreenandblue.org/2008/10/02/canadian-challenge-canadian-election-debate-or-american-vice-presidential-debate/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>Sarah Palin vs. Joe Biden - Who Won? [poll]</title>
    <link>http://redgreenandblue.org/2008/10/01/sarah-palin-vs-joe-biden-who-won/</link>
    <comments>http://redgreenandblue.org/2008/10/01/sarah-palin-vs-joe-biden-who-won/#comments</comments>
    <pubDate>Thu, 02 Oct 2008 05:35:42 +0000</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Jerry James Stone</dc:creator>
    
		<category><![CDATA[Center]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[US Election]]></category>

    <guid isPermaLink="false">http://redgreenandblue.org/2008/10/01/sarah-palin-vs-joe-biden-who-won/</guid>
    <description><![CDATA[<h3>Sen. Joe Biden from Delaware and Gov. Sarah Palin of Alaska square off in the Vice Presidential Debate, 9:00 p.m. Eastern. Join us after the debate to tell us who won and why?</h3>
<h2><strong><a href="http://answers.polldaddy.com/poll/968544/">Click Here to Answer the RG&#38;B Poll Question: Who Won Thursday&#8217;s Vice-Presidential Debate?</a></strong></h2>
<h2><span style="font-size:9px"> <a href="http://www.polldaddy.com"> </a></span></h2>
<p><a class="alignleft" href="http://redgreenandblue.org/files/2008/10/biden-and-palin-debating.jpg"><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-1182" src="http://go635254.s3.amazonaws.com/redgreenandblue/files/2008/10/biden-and-palin-debating.jpg" alt="Joe Biden and Sarah Palin go head-to-head at vice-presidential debate" width="434" height="348" /></a></p>
<p>Image source: <a href="http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Image:BidenService.jpg" target="_blank">Biden</a> and <a href="http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Image:Palin_speaking_missouri_cropedit.jpg" target="_blank">Palin</a> via Wikipedia</p>
]]></description>
    <wfw:commentRss>http://redgreenandblue.org/2008/10/01/sarah-palin-vs-joe-biden-who-won/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>Energy Might Be the Explosive Topic of the Biden-Palin Debate</title>
    <link>http://redgreenandblue.org/2008/10/01/energy-might-be-the-explosive-topic-of-the-biden-palin-debate/</link>
    <comments>http://redgreenandblue.org/2008/10/01/energy-might-be-the-explosive-topic-of-the-biden-palin-debate/#comments</comments>
    <pubDate>Thu, 02 Oct 2008 04:18:41 +0000</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Levi Novey</dc:creator>
    
		<category><![CDATA[Center]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Choice]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[US Election]]></category>

    <guid isPermaLink="false">http://redgreenandblue.org/2008/10/01/energy-might-be-the-explosive-topic-of-the-biden-palin-debate/</guid>
    <description><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://redgreenandblue.org/files/2008/10/biden-and-palin-debating.jpg"><img class="alignleft size-full wp-image-1182" src="http://go635254.s3.amazonaws.com/redgreenandblue/files/2008/10/biden-and-palin-debating.jpg" alt="Biden and Palin Speaking" width="302" height="243" /></a><strong>With the economy tanking, several wars being fought abroad, climate change producing devastating hurricanes, and <a href="http://redgreenandblue.org/2008/10/01/imagine-a-700-billion-bailout-for-the-environment/" target="_self">strengthened calls</a> for a <a href="http://redgreenandblue.org/2008/10/01/why-van-jones-should-be-obamas-secretary-of-prosperity/" target="_self">sustainable economy</a>, energy has become one of the strong links that binds all of these issues. In anticipation of tomorrow night&#8217;s vice-presidential debate, it&#8217;s probably a safe bet to put your money on energy as one of the topics that&#8217;s likely to fire up the discussion.</strong></p>
<p><strong> Here&#8217;s why:</strong>
<p><a href="http://redgreenandblue.org/2008/10/01/energy-might-be-the-explosive-topic-of-the-biden-palin-debate/" class="more-link">Read more of this story &#187;</a></p>
]]></description>
    <wfw:commentRss>http://redgreenandblue.org/2008/10/01/energy-might-be-the-explosive-topic-of-the-biden-palin-debate/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>Clinton Praises Obama in Florida While Biden Gets Ignored (VIDEO)</title>
    <link>http://redgreenandblue.org/2008/10/01/clinton-praises-obama-in-florida-while-biden-gets-ignored-video/</link>
    <comments>http://redgreenandblue.org/2008/10/01/clinton-praises-obama-in-florida-while-biden-gets-ignored-video/#comments</comments>
    <pubDate>Wed, 01 Oct 2008 23:03:18 +0000</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Jerry James Stone</dc:creator>
    
		<category><![CDATA[Liberal]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[US Election]]></category>

    <guid isPermaLink="false">http://redgreenandblue.org/2008/10/01/clinton-praises-obama-in-florida-while-biden-gets-ignored-video/</guid>
    <description><![CDATA[<p style="text-align: center">This post contains additional media. <a href="http://redgreenandblue.org/2008/10/01/clinton-praises-obama-in-florida-while-biden-gets-ignored-video/">Click here to view the full post</a>.</p>
<p style="text-align: center">Video source: <a href="http://www.npr.org/blogs/politics/2008/10/bill_clinton_turns_it_on.html">NPR</a></p>
]]></description>
    <wfw:commentRss>http://redgreenandblue.org/2008/10/01/clinton-praises-obama-in-florida-while-biden-gets-ignored-video/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>ZapRoot: Plastic Trees and Sarah Palin</title>
    <link>http://cleantechnica.com/2008/09/25/zaproot-plastic-trees-and-sarah-palin/</link>
    <comments>http://cleantechnica.com/2008/09/25/zaproot-plastic-trees-and-sarah-palin/#comments</comments>
    <pubDate>Thu, 25 Sep 2008 23:53:07 +0000</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Jeff McIntire-Strasburg</dc:creator>
    
		<category><![CDATA[carbon emissions]]></category>

    <guid isPermaLink="false">http://cleantechnica.com/2008/09/25/zaproot-plastic-trees-and-sarah-palin/</guid>
    <description><![CDATA[This post contains additional media. <a href="http://cleantechnica.com/2008/09/25/zaproot-plastic-trees-and-sarah-palin/">Click here to view the full post</a>.
<p>From our friends at <a href="http://zaproot.com/">ZapRoot</a> this week: Arizona tests artificial CO2 filtering trees. Sarah Palin loves oil. We help you find ways to get rid of your junk mail.</p>
<p><a href="http://cleantechnica.com/2008/09/25/zaproot-plastic-trees-and-sarah-palin/" class="more-link">Read more of this story &#187;</a></p>
]]></description>
    <wfw:commentRss>http://cleantechnica.com/2008/09/25/zaproot-plastic-trees-and-sarah-palin/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>Biden: No New Coal Plants in U.S. [video]</title>
    <link>http://redgreenandblue.org/2008/09/23/biden-no-new-coal-plants-in-us-video/</link>
    <comments>http://redgreenandblue.org/2008/09/23/biden-no-new-coal-plants-in-us-video/#comments</comments>
    <pubDate>Tue, 23 Sep 2008 22:21:35 +0000</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Timothy B. Hurst</dc:creator>
    
		<category><![CDATA[Center]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Climate Change]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Energy]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[US Election]]></category>

    <guid isPermaLink="false">http://redgreenandblue.org/2008/09/23/biden-no-new-coal-plants-in-us-video/</guid>
    <description><![CDATA[<p>While at a campaign stop in Maumee, OH, Democratic vice-presidential hopeful Sen. Joe Biden said there should be no new coal plants in the United States, clean or otherwise. Biden also stressed the need to get China on board. Watch for yourself:</p>
This post contains additional media. <a href="http://redgreenandblue.org/2008/09/23/biden-no-new-coal-plants-in-us-video/">Click here to view the full post</a>.
]]></description>
    <wfw:commentRss>http://redgreenandblue.org/2008/09/23/biden-no-new-coal-plants-in-us-video/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>ZapRoot: The World&#8217;s Best Bike Thief</title>
    <link>http://ecoworldly.com/2008/09/10/zaproot-the-worlds-best-bike-thief/</link>
    <comments>http://ecoworldly.com/2008/09/10/zaproot-the-worlds-best-bike-thief/#comments</comments>
    <pubDate>Wed, 10 Sep 2008 20:26:00 +0000</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Jeff McIntire-Strasburg</dc:creator>
    
		<category><![CDATA[In The Americas]]></category>

    <guid isPermaLink="false">http://ecoworldly.com/2008/09/10/zaproot-the-worlds-best-bike-thief/</guid>
    <description><![CDATA[This post contains additional media. <a href="http://ecoworldly.com/2008/09/10/zaproot-the-worlds-best-bike-thief/">Click here to view the full post</a>.
<p>This week from our friends at <a href="http://zaproot.com/">ZapRoot</a>: The most notorious bicycle thief is caught in Canada.  Find out how Green is Joe Biden?  Check out a new batch of Alternative Autos.</p>
<p><a href="http://ecoworldly.com/2008/09/10/zaproot-the-worlds-best-bike-thief/" class="more-link">Read more of this story &#187;</a></p>
]]></description>
    <wfw:commentRss>http://ecoworldly.com/2008/09/10/zaproot-the-worlds-best-bike-thief/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>Green Biz Leaders Push for Obama Win</title>
    <link>http://ecolocalizer.com/2008/09/04/green-biz-leaders-push-for-obama-win/</link>
    <comments>http://ecolocalizer.com/2008/09/04/green-biz-leaders-push-for-obama-win/#comments</comments>
    <pubDate>Thu, 04 Sep 2008 14:49:56 +0000</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Shirley Siluk Gregory</dc:creator>
    
		<category><![CDATA[Alaska]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[California]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Durham]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[EcoLocalizer]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[North Carolina]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[San Francisco]]></category>

    <guid isPermaLink="false">http://ecolocalizer.com/2008/09/04/green-biz-leaders-push-for-obama-win/</guid>
    <description><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://ecolocalizer.com/files/2008/09/barack_obama.jpg"><img class="alignnone size-medium wp-image-618" src="http://go635254.s3.amazonaws.com/ecolocalizer/files/2008/09/barack_obama.jpg" alt="realjameso16 at Wikimedia Commons under a Creative Commons license.)" width="133" height="198" /></a>Barack Obama is the U.S.&#8217;s best hope for developing a clean-energy future, according to a new group formed to promote and raise funds for the Democratic presidential nominee.</p>
<p>Cleantech &#38; Green Business Leaders for Obama (Cleantech for Obama, or CT4O) kicked off its campaign in San Francisco this week. The organization plans to hold fund-raising events across the country to collect at least $1 million to support Obama&#8217;s campaign.</p>
<p>Some of the group&#8217;s coming events include a Sept. 7 &#8220;Barbecue for Barack&#8221; in Durham, North Carolina, and an Oct. 11 &#8220;Baracktoberfest&#8221; in San Francisco.</p>
<p><a href="http://ecolocalizer.com/2008/09/04/green-biz-leaders-push-for-obama-win/" class="more-link">Read more of this story &#187;</a></p>
]]></description>
    <wfw:commentRss>http://ecolocalizer.com/2008/09/04/green-biz-leaders-push-for-obama-win/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>Biden Says Obama Will Make Alternative Energy a National Priority</title>
    <link>http://redgreenandblue.org/2008/08/28/biden-says-obama-will-make-alternative-energy-a-national-priority/</link>
    <comments>http://redgreenandblue.org/2008/08/28/biden-says-obama-will-make-alternative-energy-a-national-priority/#comments</comments>
    <pubDate>Thu, 28 Aug 2008 15:13:09 +0000</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Andrew Williams</dc:creator>
    
		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Choice]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Liberal]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[US Election]]></category>

    <guid isPermaLink="false">http://redgreenandblue.org/2008/08/28/biden-says-obama-will-make-alternative-energy-a-national-priority/</guid>
    <description><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://redgreenandblue.org/files/2008/08/biden.jpg"><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-819" src="http://go635254.s3.amazonaws.com/redgreenandblue/files/2008/08/biden.jpg" alt="" width="500" height="300" /></a>In his much anticipated <a title="Biden speech" href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2008/aug/28/uselections2008.joebiden?gusrc=rss&#38;feed=worldnews" target="_blank">speech at the Democratic Convention in Denver</a>, Vice Presidential candidate Joe Biden has confirmed that, if elected, Barack Obama will give priority to bold policies on alternative energy.</p>
<p>In a clear reference to the Republican voting record on <a title="retc" href="http://redgreenandblue.org/2008/07/28/lets-try-this-again-senate-to-vote-on-renewables/" target="_self">renewable energy tax credits</a>, and <a title="mccain" href="http://redgreenandblue.org/2008/08/19/mccain-meets-with-pickens-says-of-course-he-supports-renewable-energy-tax-credits/" target="_self">McCain&#8217;s personal views on the issue</a>, he said, &#8220;Even today, as oil companies post the biggest profits in history—a half trillion dollars in the last five years—he wants to give them another $4bn in tax breaks. But he voted time and again against incentives for renewable energy: solar, wind, bio-fuels. That&#8217;s not change; that&#8217;s more of the same.&#8221;</p>
<p><a href="http://redgreenandblue.org/2008/08/28/biden-says-obama-will-make-alternative-energy-a-national-priority/" class="more-link">Read more of this story &#187;</a></p>
]]></description>
    <wfw:commentRss>http://redgreenandblue.org/2008/08/28/biden-says-obama-will-make-alternative-energy-a-national-priority/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
  </item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- 695 queries in 1.793 seconds. -->